Evaluation of the serum ionic fluoride concentration as a biomarker of bone metabolism post-spinal fusion surgery

Bone union after spinal fusion surgery with instrumentation has been determined only with imaging studies. We evaluated the usefulness of the serum ionic fluoride (SIF) concentration as a biomarker of the bone union status. We enrolled 25 patients who underwent spinal surgery in our institution, and...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Clinica chimica acta 2018-09, Vol.484, p.132-135
Hauptverfasser: Oikawa, Ryosuke, Fujita, Yuji, Murakami, Hideki, Endo, Hirooki, Yamabe, Daisuke, Chiba, Yusuke, Abe, Yuichiro, Doita, Minoru
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 135
container_issue
container_start_page 132
container_title Clinica chimica acta
container_volume 484
creator Oikawa, Ryosuke
Fujita, Yuji
Murakami, Hideki
Endo, Hirooki
Yamabe, Daisuke
Chiba, Yusuke
Abe, Yuichiro
Doita, Minoru
description Bone union after spinal fusion surgery with instrumentation has been determined only with imaging studies. We evaluated the usefulness of the serum ionic fluoride (SIF) concentration as a biomarker of the bone union status. We enrolled 25 patients who underwent spinal surgery in our institution, and we divided patients into three groups with and without instrumentation (G1, G2, and G3). We collected the fasting serum level preoperatively and on day 1 (D1), week 1 (D7), week 2 (D14), month 1 (D30), month 3 (D90), and month 6 (D180) postoperatively, and measured SIF concentrations using the flow injection method with an ion-selective electrode. Although preoperative SIF concentrations were similar among the 3 groups, postoperative SIF concentrations were different among the groups. SIF concentrations in groups with instrumentation (G2 and G3) increased between D14 and D90 postoperatively and decreased at D180 postoperatively. SIF concentrations in the group without instrumentation (G1) decreased between D30 and D180 postoperatively. An SIF concentration that is higher postoperatively than preoperatively may indicate unstable bone union, whereas a lower SIF concentration postoperatively than preoperatively may indicate stable bone union. We concluded that the SIF concentration may be useful for diagnosing bone union. •Usefulness of the SIF level as a biomarker of the bone union status is unclear.•The SIF concentration may be useful for diagnosing bone union.•A higher SIF level postoperatively than preoperatively may indicate unstable union.•A lower SIF level postoperatively than preoperatively may indicate stable union.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.cca.2018.05.021
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2042750768</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0009898118302304</els_id><sourcerecordid>2042750768</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c419t-5186d609fa0d8826601328912e5c246f7505ec1e952f639640b17e647dfcd5133</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kE1P3DAQhq2KqizQH8Cl8rGXhLHjOLZ6qhBfEhKXcrYcZ1y8TeLFTpD493i1lCOn0Yye95XmIeScQc2AyYtt7ZytOTBVQ1sDZ1_IhqmuqRqh-RHZAICulFbsmJzkvC2rAMm-kWOuO8WVEBvyfPVix9UuIc40ero8Ic2Y1omWQ3DUj2tMYUDq4uxwXtKBtJla2oc42fQP0z7YxxnphIvt4xjyRHcxL1XehdmO1K95H8pr-ovp9Yx89XbM-P19npLH66s_l7fV_cPN3eXv-8oJppeqZUoOErS3MCjFpQTWcKUZx9ZxIX3XQouOoW65l42WAnrWoRTd4N3QsqY5JT8PvbsUn1fMi5lCdjiOdsa4ZsNB8FLSSVVQdkBdijkn9GaXQvnt1TAwe9Nma4ppszdtoDXFdMn8eK9f-wmHj8R_tQX4dQCwPPkSMJnsAhaLQ0joFjPE8En9G-8hju8</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2042750768</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Evaluation of the serum ionic fluoride concentration as a biomarker of bone metabolism post-spinal fusion surgery</title><source>Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)</source><creator>Oikawa, Ryosuke ; Fujita, Yuji ; Murakami, Hideki ; Endo, Hirooki ; Yamabe, Daisuke ; Chiba, Yusuke ; Abe, Yuichiro ; Doita, Minoru</creator><creatorcontrib>Oikawa, Ryosuke ; Fujita, Yuji ; Murakami, Hideki ; Endo, Hirooki ; Yamabe, Daisuke ; Chiba, Yusuke ; Abe, Yuichiro ; Doita, Minoru</creatorcontrib><description>Bone union after spinal fusion surgery with instrumentation has been determined only with imaging studies. We evaluated the usefulness of the serum ionic fluoride (SIF) concentration as a biomarker of the bone union status. We enrolled 25 patients who underwent spinal surgery in our institution, and we divided patients into three groups with and without instrumentation (G1, G2, and G3). We collected the fasting serum level preoperatively and on day 1 (D1), week 1 (D7), week 2 (D14), month 1 (D30), month 3 (D90), and month 6 (D180) postoperatively, and measured SIF concentrations using the flow injection method with an ion-selective electrode. Although preoperative SIF concentrations were similar among the 3 groups, postoperative SIF concentrations were different among the groups. SIF concentrations in groups with instrumentation (G2 and G3) increased between D14 and D90 postoperatively and decreased at D180 postoperatively. SIF concentrations in the group without instrumentation (G1) decreased between D30 and D180 postoperatively. An SIF concentration that is higher postoperatively than preoperatively may indicate unstable bone union, whereas a lower SIF concentration postoperatively than preoperatively may indicate stable bone union. We concluded that the SIF concentration may be useful for diagnosing bone union. •Usefulness of the SIF level as a biomarker of the bone union status is unclear.•The SIF concentration may be useful for diagnosing bone union.•A higher SIF level postoperatively than preoperatively may indicate unstable union.•A lower SIF level postoperatively than preoperatively may indicate stable union.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0009-8981</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-3492</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.cca.2018.05.021</identifier><identifier>PMID: 29782844</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Netherlands: Elsevier B.V</publisher><subject>Biomarker ; Bone metabolism ; Ionic fluoride concentration ; Post-spinal fusion ; Spinal fusion surgery ; Spine</subject><ispartof>Clinica chimica acta, 2018-09, Vol.484, p.132-135</ispartof><rights>2018 Elsevier B.V.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2018 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c419t-5186d609fa0d8826601328912e5c246f7505ec1e952f639640b17e647dfcd5133</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c419t-5186d609fa0d8826601328912e5c246f7505ec1e952f639640b17e647dfcd5133</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cca.2018.05.021$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3550,27924,27925,45995</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29782844$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Oikawa, Ryosuke</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fujita, Yuji</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Murakami, Hideki</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Endo, Hirooki</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yamabe, Daisuke</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chiba, Yusuke</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Abe, Yuichiro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Doita, Minoru</creatorcontrib><title>Evaluation of the serum ionic fluoride concentration as a biomarker of bone metabolism post-spinal fusion surgery</title><title>Clinica chimica acta</title><addtitle>Clin Chim Acta</addtitle><description>Bone union after spinal fusion surgery with instrumentation has been determined only with imaging studies. We evaluated the usefulness of the serum ionic fluoride (SIF) concentration as a biomarker of the bone union status. We enrolled 25 patients who underwent spinal surgery in our institution, and we divided patients into three groups with and without instrumentation (G1, G2, and G3). We collected the fasting serum level preoperatively and on day 1 (D1), week 1 (D7), week 2 (D14), month 1 (D30), month 3 (D90), and month 6 (D180) postoperatively, and measured SIF concentrations using the flow injection method with an ion-selective electrode. Although preoperative SIF concentrations were similar among the 3 groups, postoperative SIF concentrations were different among the groups. SIF concentrations in groups with instrumentation (G2 and G3) increased between D14 and D90 postoperatively and decreased at D180 postoperatively. SIF concentrations in the group without instrumentation (G1) decreased between D30 and D180 postoperatively. An SIF concentration that is higher postoperatively than preoperatively may indicate unstable bone union, whereas a lower SIF concentration postoperatively than preoperatively may indicate stable bone union. We concluded that the SIF concentration may be useful for diagnosing bone union. •Usefulness of the SIF level as a biomarker of the bone union status is unclear.•The SIF concentration may be useful for diagnosing bone union.•A higher SIF level postoperatively than preoperatively may indicate unstable union.•A lower SIF level postoperatively than preoperatively may indicate stable union.</description><subject>Biomarker</subject><subject>Bone metabolism</subject><subject>Ionic fluoride concentration</subject><subject>Post-spinal fusion</subject><subject>Spinal fusion surgery</subject><subject>Spine</subject><issn>0009-8981</issn><issn>1873-3492</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kE1P3DAQhq2KqizQH8Cl8rGXhLHjOLZ6qhBfEhKXcrYcZ1y8TeLFTpD493i1lCOn0Yye95XmIeScQc2AyYtt7ZytOTBVQ1sDZ1_IhqmuqRqh-RHZAICulFbsmJzkvC2rAMm-kWOuO8WVEBvyfPVix9UuIc40ero8Ic2Y1omWQ3DUj2tMYUDq4uxwXtKBtJla2oc42fQP0z7YxxnphIvt4xjyRHcxL1XehdmO1K95H8pr-ovp9Yx89XbM-P19npLH66s_l7fV_cPN3eXv-8oJppeqZUoOErS3MCjFpQTWcKUZx9ZxIX3XQouOoW65l42WAnrWoRTd4N3QsqY5JT8PvbsUn1fMi5lCdjiOdsa4ZsNB8FLSSVVQdkBdijkn9GaXQvnt1TAwe9Nma4ppszdtoDXFdMn8eK9f-wmHj8R_tQX4dQCwPPkSMJnsAhaLQ0joFjPE8En9G-8hju8</recordid><startdate>20180901</startdate><enddate>20180901</enddate><creator>Oikawa, Ryosuke</creator><creator>Fujita, Yuji</creator><creator>Murakami, Hideki</creator><creator>Endo, Hirooki</creator><creator>Yamabe, Daisuke</creator><creator>Chiba, Yusuke</creator><creator>Abe, Yuichiro</creator><creator>Doita, Minoru</creator><general>Elsevier B.V</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20180901</creationdate><title>Evaluation of the serum ionic fluoride concentration as a biomarker of bone metabolism post-spinal fusion surgery</title><author>Oikawa, Ryosuke ; Fujita, Yuji ; Murakami, Hideki ; Endo, Hirooki ; Yamabe, Daisuke ; Chiba, Yusuke ; Abe, Yuichiro ; Doita, Minoru</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c419t-5186d609fa0d8826601328912e5c246f7505ec1e952f639640b17e647dfcd5133</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Biomarker</topic><topic>Bone metabolism</topic><topic>Ionic fluoride concentration</topic><topic>Post-spinal fusion</topic><topic>Spinal fusion surgery</topic><topic>Spine</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Oikawa, Ryosuke</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fujita, Yuji</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Murakami, Hideki</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Endo, Hirooki</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yamabe, Daisuke</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chiba, Yusuke</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Abe, Yuichiro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Doita, Minoru</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Clinica chimica acta</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Oikawa, Ryosuke</au><au>Fujita, Yuji</au><au>Murakami, Hideki</au><au>Endo, Hirooki</au><au>Yamabe, Daisuke</au><au>Chiba, Yusuke</au><au>Abe, Yuichiro</au><au>Doita, Minoru</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Evaluation of the serum ionic fluoride concentration as a biomarker of bone metabolism post-spinal fusion surgery</atitle><jtitle>Clinica chimica acta</jtitle><addtitle>Clin Chim Acta</addtitle><date>2018-09-01</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>484</volume><spage>132</spage><epage>135</epage><pages>132-135</pages><issn>0009-8981</issn><eissn>1873-3492</eissn><abstract>Bone union after spinal fusion surgery with instrumentation has been determined only with imaging studies. We evaluated the usefulness of the serum ionic fluoride (SIF) concentration as a biomarker of the bone union status. We enrolled 25 patients who underwent spinal surgery in our institution, and we divided patients into three groups with and without instrumentation (G1, G2, and G3). We collected the fasting serum level preoperatively and on day 1 (D1), week 1 (D7), week 2 (D14), month 1 (D30), month 3 (D90), and month 6 (D180) postoperatively, and measured SIF concentrations using the flow injection method with an ion-selective electrode. Although preoperative SIF concentrations were similar among the 3 groups, postoperative SIF concentrations were different among the groups. SIF concentrations in groups with instrumentation (G2 and G3) increased between D14 and D90 postoperatively and decreased at D180 postoperatively. SIF concentrations in the group without instrumentation (G1) decreased between D30 and D180 postoperatively. An SIF concentration that is higher postoperatively than preoperatively may indicate unstable bone union, whereas a lower SIF concentration postoperatively than preoperatively may indicate stable bone union. We concluded that the SIF concentration may be useful for diagnosing bone union. •Usefulness of the SIF level as a biomarker of the bone union status is unclear.•The SIF concentration may be useful for diagnosing bone union.•A higher SIF level postoperatively than preoperatively may indicate unstable union.•A lower SIF level postoperatively than preoperatively may indicate stable union.</abstract><cop>Netherlands</cop><pub>Elsevier B.V</pub><pmid>29782844</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.cca.2018.05.021</doi><tpages>4</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0009-8981
ispartof Clinica chimica acta, 2018-09, Vol.484, p.132-135
issn 0009-8981
1873-3492
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2042750768
source Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)
subjects Biomarker
Bone metabolism
Ionic fluoride concentration
Post-spinal fusion
Spinal fusion surgery
Spine
title Evaluation of the serum ionic fluoride concentration as a biomarker of bone metabolism post-spinal fusion surgery
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-18T18%3A21%3A41IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Evaluation%20of%20the%20serum%20ionic%20fluoride%20concentration%20as%20a%20biomarker%20of%20bone%20metabolism%20post-spinal%20fusion%20surgery&rft.jtitle=Clinica%20chimica%20acta&rft.au=Oikawa,%20Ryosuke&rft.date=2018-09-01&rft.volume=484&rft.spage=132&rft.epage=135&rft.pages=132-135&rft.issn=0009-8981&rft.eissn=1873-3492&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.cca.2018.05.021&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2042750768%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2042750768&rft_id=info:pmid/29782844&rft_els_id=S0009898118302304&rfr_iscdi=true