Evaluation of the serum ionic fluoride concentration as a biomarker of bone metabolism post-spinal fusion surgery
Bone union after spinal fusion surgery with instrumentation has been determined only with imaging studies. We evaluated the usefulness of the serum ionic fluoride (SIF) concentration as a biomarker of the bone union status. We enrolled 25 patients who underwent spinal surgery in our institution, and...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Clinica chimica acta 2018-09, Vol.484, p.132-135 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 135 |
---|---|
container_issue | |
container_start_page | 132 |
container_title | Clinica chimica acta |
container_volume | 484 |
creator | Oikawa, Ryosuke Fujita, Yuji Murakami, Hideki Endo, Hirooki Yamabe, Daisuke Chiba, Yusuke Abe, Yuichiro Doita, Minoru |
description | Bone union after spinal fusion surgery with instrumentation has been determined only with imaging studies. We evaluated the usefulness of the serum ionic fluoride (SIF) concentration as a biomarker of the bone union status.
We enrolled 25 patients who underwent spinal surgery in our institution, and we divided patients into three groups with and without instrumentation (G1, G2, and G3). We collected the fasting serum level preoperatively and on day 1 (D1), week 1 (D7), week 2 (D14), month 1 (D30), month 3 (D90), and month 6 (D180) postoperatively, and measured SIF concentrations using the flow injection method with an ion-selective electrode.
Although preoperative SIF concentrations were similar among the 3 groups, postoperative SIF concentrations were different among the groups. SIF concentrations in groups with instrumentation (G2 and G3) increased between D14 and D90 postoperatively and decreased at D180 postoperatively. SIF concentrations in the group without instrumentation (G1) decreased between D30 and D180 postoperatively.
An SIF concentration that is higher postoperatively than preoperatively may indicate unstable bone union, whereas a lower SIF concentration postoperatively than preoperatively may indicate stable bone union. We concluded that the SIF concentration may be useful for diagnosing bone union.
•Usefulness of the SIF level as a biomarker of the bone union status is unclear.•The SIF concentration may be useful for diagnosing bone union.•A higher SIF level postoperatively than preoperatively may indicate unstable union.•A lower SIF level postoperatively than preoperatively may indicate stable union. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.cca.2018.05.021 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2042750768</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0009898118302304</els_id><sourcerecordid>2042750768</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c419t-5186d609fa0d8826601328912e5c246f7505ec1e952f639640b17e647dfcd5133</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kE1P3DAQhq2KqizQH8Cl8rGXhLHjOLZ6qhBfEhKXcrYcZ1y8TeLFTpD493i1lCOn0Yye95XmIeScQc2AyYtt7ZytOTBVQ1sDZ1_IhqmuqRqh-RHZAICulFbsmJzkvC2rAMm-kWOuO8WVEBvyfPVix9UuIc40ero8Ic2Y1omWQ3DUj2tMYUDq4uxwXtKBtJla2oc42fQP0z7YxxnphIvt4xjyRHcxL1XehdmO1K95H8pr-ovp9Yx89XbM-P19npLH66s_l7fV_cPN3eXv-8oJppeqZUoOErS3MCjFpQTWcKUZx9ZxIX3XQouOoW65l42WAnrWoRTd4N3QsqY5JT8PvbsUn1fMi5lCdjiOdsa4ZsNB8FLSSVVQdkBdijkn9GaXQvnt1TAwe9Nma4ppszdtoDXFdMn8eK9f-wmHj8R_tQX4dQCwPPkSMJnsAhaLQ0joFjPE8En9G-8hju8</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2042750768</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Evaluation of the serum ionic fluoride concentration as a biomarker of bone metabolism post-spinal fusion surgery</title><source>Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)</source><creator>Oikawa, Ryosuke ; Fujita, Yuji ; Murakami, Hideki ; Endo, Hirooki ; Yamabe, Daisuke ; Chiba, Yusuke ; Abe, Yuichiro ; Doita, Minoru</creator><creatorcontrib>Oikawa, Ryosuke ; Fujita, Yuji ; Murakami, Hideki ; Endo, Hirooki ; Yamabe, Daisuke ; Chiba, Yusuke ; Abe, Yuichiro ; Doita, Minoru</creatorcontrib><description>Bone union after spinal fusion surgery with instrumentation has been determined only with imaging studies. We evaluated the usefulness of the serum ionic fluoride (SIF) concentration as a biomarker of the bone union status.
We enrolled 25 patients who underwent spinal surgery in our institution, and we divided patients into three groups with and without instrumentation (G1, G2, and G3). We collected the fasting serum level preoperatively and on day 1 (D1), week 1 (D7), week 2 (D14), month 1 (D30), month 3 (D90), and month 6 (D180) postoperatively, and measured SIF concentrations using the flow injection method with an ion-selective electrode.
Although preoperative SIF concentrations were similar among the 3 groups, postoperative SIF concentrations were different among the groups. SIF concentrations in groups with instrumentation (G2 and G3) increased between D14 and D90 postoperatively and decreased at D180 postoperatively. SIF concentrations in the group without instrumentation (G1) decreased between D30 and D180 postoperatively.
An SIF concentration that is higher postoperatively than preoperatively may indicate unstable bone union, whereas a lower SIF concentration postoperatively than preoperatively may indicate stable bone union. We concluded that the SIF concentration may be useful for diagnosing bone union.
•Usefulness of the SIF level as a biomarker of the bone union status is unclear.•The SIF concentration may be useful for diagnosing bone union.•A higher SIF level postoperatively than preoperatively may indicate unstable union.•A lower SIF level postoperatively than preoperatively may indicate stable union.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0009-8981</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-3492</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.cca.2018.05.021</identifier><identifier>PMID: 29782844</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Netherlands: Elsevier B.V</publisher><subject>Biomarker ; Bone metabolism ; Ionic fluoride concentration ; Post-spinal fusion ; Spinal fusion surgery ; Spine</subject><ispartof>Clinica chimica acta, 2018-09, Vol.484, p.132-135</ispartof><rights>2018 Elsevier B.V.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2018 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c419t-5186d609fa0d8826601328912e5c246f7505ec1e952f639640b17e647dfcd5133</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c419t-5186d609fa0d8826601328912e5c246f7505ec1e952f639640b17e647dfcd5133</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cca.2018.05.021$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3550,27924,27925,45995</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29782844$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Oikawa, Ryosuke</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fujita, Yuji</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Murakami, Hideki</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Endo, Hirooki</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yamabe, Daisuke</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chiba, Yusuke</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Abe, Yuichiro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Doita, Minoru</creatorcontrib><title>Evaluation of the serum ionic fluoride concentration as a biomarker of bone metabolism post-spinal fusion surgery</title><title>Clinica chimica acta</title><addtitle>Clin Chim Acta</addtitle><description>Bone union after spinal fusion surgery with instrumentation has been determined only with imaging studies. We evaluated the usefulness of the serum ionic fluoride (SIF) concentration as a biomarker of the bone union status.
We enrolled 25 patients who underwent spinal surgery in our institution, and we divided patients into three groups with and without instrumentation (G1, G2, and G3). We collected the fasting serum level preoperatively and on day 1 (D1), week 1 (D7), week 2 (D14), month 1 (D30), month 3 (D90), and month 6 (D180) postoperatively, and measured SIF concentrations using the flow injection method with an ion-selective electrode.
Although preoperative SIF concentrations were similar among the 3 groups, postoperative SIF concentrations were different among the groups. SIF concentrations in groups with instrumentation (G2 and G3) increased between D14 and D90 postoperatively and decreased at D180 postoperatively. SIF concentrations in the group without instrumentation (G1) decreased between D30 and D180 postoperatively.
An SIF concentration that is higher postoperatively than preoperatively may indicate unstable bone union, whereas a lower SIF concentration postoperatively than preoperatively may indicate stable bone union. We concluded that the SIF concentration may be useful for diagnosing bone union.
•Usefulness of the SIF level as a biomarker of the bone union status is unclear.•The SIF concentration may be useful for diagnosing bone union.•A higher SIF level postoperatively than preoperatively may indicate unstable union.•A lower SIF level postoperatively than preoperatively may indicate stable union.</description><subject>Biomarker</subject><subject>Bone metabolism</subject><subject>Ionic fluoride concentration</subject><subject>Post-spinal fusion</subject><subject>Spinal fusion surgery</subject><subject>Spine</subject><issn>0009-8981</issn><issn>1873-3492</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kE1P3DAQhq2KqizQH8Cl8rGXhLHjOLZ6qhBfEhKXcrYcZ1y8TeLFTpD493i1lCOn0Yye95XmIeScQc2AyYtt7ZytOTBVQ1sDZ1_IhqmuqRqh-RHZAICulFbsmJzkvC2rAMm-kWOuO8WVEBvyfPVix9UuIc40ero8Ic2Y1omWQ3DUj2tMYUDq4uxwXtKBtJla2oc42fQP0z7YxxnphIvt4xjyRHcxL1XehdmO1K95H8pr-ovp9Yx89XbM-P19npLH66s_l7fV_cPN3eXv-8oJppeqZUoOErS3MCjFpQTWcKUZx9ZxIX3XQouOoW65l42WAnrWoRTd4N3QsqY5JT8PvbsUn1fMi5lCdjiOdsa4ZsNB8FLSSVVQdkBdijkn9GaXQvnt1TAwe9Nma4ppszdtoDXFdMn8eK9f-wmHj8R_tQX4dQCwPPkSMJnsAhaLQ0joFjPE8En9G-8hju8</recordid><startdate>20180901</startdate><enddate>20180901</enddate><creator>Oikawa, Ryosuke</creator><creator>Fujita, Yuji</creator><creator>Murakami, Hideki</creator><creator>Endo, Hirooki</creator><creator>Yamabe, Daisuke</creator><creator>Chiba, Yusuke</creator><creator>Abe, Yuichiro</creator><creator>Doita, Minoru</creator><general>Elsevier B.V</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20180901</creationdate><title>Evaluation of the serum ionic fluoride concentration as a biomarker of bone metabolism post-spinal fusion surgery</title><author>Oikawa, Ryosuke ; Fujita, Yuji ; Murakami, Hideki ; Endo, Hirooki ; Yamabe, Daisuke ; Chiba, Yusuke ; Abe, Yuichiro ; Doita, Minoru</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c419t-5186d609fa0d8826601328912e5c246f7505ec1e952f639640b17e647dfcd5133</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Biomarker</topic><topic>Bone metabolism</topic><topic>Ionic fluoride concentration</topic><topic>Post-spinal fusion</topic><topic>Spinal fusion surgery</topic><topic>Spine</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Oikawa, Ryosuke</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fujita, Yuji</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Murakami, Hideki</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Endo, Hirooki</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yamabe, Daisuke</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chiba, Yusuke</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Abe, Yuichiro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Doita, Minoru</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Clinica chimica acta</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Oikawa, Ryosuke</au><au>Fujita, Yuji</au><au>Murakami, Hideki</au><au>Endo, Hirooki</au><au>Yamabe, Daisuke</au><au>Chiba, Yusuke</au><au>Abe, Yuichiro</au><au>Doita, Minoru</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Evaluation of the serum ionic fluoride concentration as a biomarker of bone metabolism post-spinal fusion surgery</atitle><jtitle>Clinica chimica acta</jtitle><addtitle>Clin Chim Acta</addtitle><date>2018-09-01</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>484</volume><spage>132</spage><epage>135</epage><pages>132-135</pages><issn>0009-8981</issn><eissn>1873-3492</eissn><abstract>Bone union after spinal fusion surgery with instrumentation has been determined only with imaging studies. We evaluated the usefulness of the serum ionic fluoride (SIF) concentration as a biomarker of the bone union status.
We enrolled 25 patients who underwent spinal surgery in our institution, and we divided patients into three groups with and without instrumentation (G1, G2, and G3). We collected the fasting serum level preoperatively and on day 1 (D1), week 1 (D7), week 2 (D14), month 1 (D30), month 3 (D90), and month 6 (D180) postoperatively, and measured SIF concentrations using the flow injection method with an ion-selective electrode.
Although preoperative SIF concentrations were similar among the 3 groups, postoperative SIF concentrations were different among the groups. SIF concentrations in groups with instrumentation (G2 and G3) increased between D14 and D90 postoperatively and decreased at D180 postoperatively. SIF concentrations in the group without instrumentation (G1) decreased between D30 and D180 postoperatively.
An SIF concentration that is higher postoperatively than preoperatively may indicate unstable bone union, whereas a lower SIF concentration postoperatively than preoperatively may indicate stable bone union. We concluded that the SIF concentration may be useful for diagnosing bone union.
•Usefulness of the SIF level as a biomarker of the bone union status is unclear.•The SIF concentration may be useful for diagnosing bone union.•A higher SIF level postoperatively than preoperatively may indicate unstable union.•A lower SIF level postoperatively than preoperatively may indicate stable union.</abstract><cop>Netherlands</cop><pub>Elsevier B.V</pub><pmid>29782844</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.cca.2018.05.021</doi><tpages>4</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0009-8981 |
ispartof | Clinica chimica acta, 2018-09, Vol.484, p.132-135 |
issn | 0009-8981 1873-3492 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2042750768 |
source | Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier) |
subjects | Biomarker Bone metabolism Ionic fluoride concentration Post-spinal fusion Spinal fusion surgery Spine |
title | Evaluation of the serum ionic fluoride concentration as a biomarker of bone metabolism post-spinal fusion surgery |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-18T18%3A21%3A41IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Evaluation%20of%20the%20serum%20ionic%20fluoride%20concentration%20as%20a%20biomarker%20of%20bone%20metabolism%20post-spinal%20fusion%20surgery&rft.jtitle=Clinica%20chimica%20acta&rft.au=Oikawa,%20Ryosuke&rft.date=2018-09-01&rft.volume=484&rft.spage=132&rft.epage=135&rft.pages=132-135&rft.issn=0009-8981&rft.eissn=1873-3492&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.cca.2018.05.021&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2042750768%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2042750768&rft_id=info:pmid/29782844&rft_els_id=S0009898118302304&rfr_iscdi=true |