A survey of health professionals’ views on acceptable gestational age and termination of pregnancy for fetal anomaly

Termination of pregnancy for fetal anomaly is legal in the UK with no upper limit, if two doctors, in good faith, agree “there is a substantial risk that if the child were born it would suffer from such physical or mental abnormalities as to be seriously handicapped”. This is Clause E of the Human F...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:European journal of medical genetics 2018-09, Vol.61 (9), p.493-498
Hauptverfasser: Crowe, Lisa, Graham, Ruth H., Robson, Stephen C., Rankin, Judith
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 498
container_issue 9
container_start_page 493
container_title European journal of medical genetics
container_volume 61
creator Crowe, Lisa
Graham, Ruth H.
Robson, Stephen C.
Rankin, Judith
description Termination of pregnancy for fetal anomaly is legal in the UK with no upper limit, if two doctors, in good faith, agree “there is a substantial risk that if the child were born it would suffer from such physical or mental abnormalities as to be seriously handicapped”. This is Clause E of the Human Fertlisation and Embryology Act. The most commonly sighted Clause is C, which states “the pregnancy has not exceeded its twenty-fourth week and that the continuance of the pregnancy would involve risk, greater than if the pregnancy were terminated, of injury to the physical or mental health of the pregnant woman”. This study aimed to investigate health professionals’ views on gestational age and acceptable termination of pregnancy for fetal anomaly (TOPFA). We undertook a questionnaire survey of UK health professionals working in fetal medicine, obstetrics and gynaecology and neonatology. A study pack consisting of a self-completion questionnaire, an invitation letter, participant information sheet, and a stamped addressed return envelope, were sent to health professionals. We used four fetal anomalies as case study examples in the questionnaire: isolated cleft lip, hypoplastic left heart, spina bifida and trisomy 21. These anomalies were chosen as they differed in terms of the type of anomaly, the type of impairment, and the perceived severity. Forty-one study packs were returned. For anomalies deemed less serious, later gestational ages were an important consideration when deciding acceptable TOPFA. The prognosis of an anomaly was considered an important factor in deciding whether a TOPFA was acceptable alongside gestational age. Clause C of the current UK legislation, which allows a legal termination prior to 24 weeks gestational age if continuing with the pregnancy would impact the mental health of the mother, was deemed a reasonable option for termination when parents are requesting a TOPFA. For each case study example, health professionals responded that TOPFA at ‘25 weeks and over’ was acceptable (cleft lip n = 1; hypoplastic left heart n = 19; spina bifida n = 13 and Trisomy 21 n = 10). Professionals also distinguished between their personal and professional views. These findings offer new insight into how gestational age considerations influence professionals’ conceptualisation of acceptable TOPFA.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.ejmg.2018.05.011
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2042231168</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S1769721218301782</els_id><sourcerecordid>2042231168</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c400t-a054714e4181d7bbaecc983d29c02b8ac90480a4f4bceff7825efb6192e635803</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kMtu1DAUQC1ERUvhB1ggL9kkXDtObEtsqqo8pErdtGvLca6nGSX2YGcGzY7f4Pf4EpxOYcnKlnXuke8h5B2DmgHrPm5r3M6bmgNTNbQ1MPaCXDAlVQVK6JflLjtdSc74OXmd8xagUYzrV-Scayml0uqCHK5o3qcDHmn09BHttDzSXYoecx5jsFP-_fMXPYz4I9MYqHUOd4vtJ6QbzItdnhhqN0htGOiCaR7D0-uq2yXcBBvckfqYqMdlRUOc7XR8Q858kePb5_OSPHy-ub_-Wt3effl2fXVbOQGwVBZaIZlAwRQbZN9bdE6rZuDaAe-VdRqEAiu86B16LxVv0fcd0xy7plXQXJIPJ2_Z6fu-fNnMY3Y4TTZg3GfDQXDeMNapgvIT6lLMOaE3uzTONh0NA7P2Nluz9jZrbwOtKb3L0Ptn_76fcfg38jdwAT6dACxblo7JZDdicDiMCd1ihjj-z_8H4o-Ubg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2042231168</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>A survey of health professionals’ views on acceptable gestational age and termination of pregnancy for fetal anomaly</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)</source><creator>Crowe, Lisa ; Graham, Ruth H. ; Robson, Stephen C. ; Rankin, Judith</creator><creatorcontrib>Crowe, Lisa ; Graham, Ruth H. ; Robson, Stephen C. ; Rankin, Judith</creatorcontrib><description>Termination of pregnancy for fetal anomaly is legal in the UK with no upper limit, if two doctors, in good faith, agree “there is a substantial risk that if the child were born it would suffer from such physical or mental abnormalities as to be seriously handicapped”. This is Clause E of the Human Fertlisation and Embryology Act. The most commonly sighted Clause is C, which states “the pregnancy has not exceeded its twenty-fourth week and that the continuance of the pregnancy would involve risk, greater than if the pregnancy were terminated, of injury to the physical or mental health of the pregnant woman”. This study aimed to investigate health professionals’ views on gestational age and acceptable termination of pregnancy for fetal anomaly (TOPFA). We undertook a questionnaire survey of UK health professionals working in fetal medicine, obstetrics and gynaecology and neonatology. A study pack consisting of a self-completion questionnaire, an invitation letter, participant information sheet, and a stamped addressed return envelope, were sent to health professionals. We used four fetal anomalies as case study examples in the questionnaire: isolated cleft lip, hypoplastic left heart, spina bifida and trisomy 21. These anomalies were chosen as they differed in terms of the type of anomaly, the type of impairment, and the perceived severity. Forty-one study packs were returned. For anomalies deemed less serious, later gestational ages were an important consideration when deciding acceptable TOPFA. The prognosis of an anomaly was considered an important factor in deciding whether a TOPFA was acceptable alongside gestational age. Clause C of the current UK legislation, which allows a legal termination prior to 24 weeks gestational age if continuing with the pregnancy would impact the mental health of the mother, was deemed a reasonable option for termination when parents are requesting a TOPFA. For each case study example, health professionals responded that TOPFA at ‘25 weeks and over’ was acceptable (cleft lip n = 1; hypoplastic left heart n = 19; spina bifida n = 13 and Trisomy 21 n = 10). Professionals also distinguished between their personal and professional views. These findings offer new insight into how gestational age considerations influence professionals’ conceptualisation of acceptable TOPFA.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1769-7212</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1878-0849</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.ejmg.2018.05.011</identifier><identifier>PMID: 29777898</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Netherlands: Elsevier Masson SAS</publisher><subject>Abortion, Induced - ethics ; Abortion, Induced - standards ; Attitude ; Congenital Abnormalities - psychology ; Congenital Abnormalities - surgery ; Female ; Fetal Diseases - psychology ; Fetal Diseases - surgery ; Gestational Age ; Health Personnel - ethics ; Health Personnel - psychology ; Health professionals ; Humans ; Male ; Pregnancy ; Termination of pregnancy ; Termination of pregnancy for fetal anomaly ; United Kingdom</subject><ispartof>European journal of medical genetics, 2018-09, Vol.61 (9), p.493-498</ispartof><rights>2018 Elsevier Masson SAS</rights><rights>Copyright © 2018 Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c400t-a054714e4181d7bbaecc983d29c02b8ac90480a4f4bceff7825efb6192e635803</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c400t-a054714e4181d7bbaecc983d29c02b8ac90480a4f4bceff7825efb6192e635803</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ejmg.2018.05.011$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3550,27924,27925,45995</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29777898$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Crowe, Lisa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Graham, Ruth H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Robson, Stephen C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rankin, Judith</creatorcontrib><title>A survey of health professionals’ views on acceptable gestational age and termination of pregnancy for fetal anomaly</title><title>European journal of medical genetics</title><addtitle>Eur J Med Genet</addtitle><description>Termination of pregnancy for fetal anomaly is legal in the UK with no upper limit, if two doctors, in good faith, agree “there is a substantial risk that if the child were born it would suffer from such physical or mental abnormalities as to be seriously handicapped”. This is Clause E of the Human Fertlisation and Embryology Act. The most commonly sighted Clause is C, which states “the pregnancy has not exceeded its twenty-fourth week and that the continuance of the pregnancy would involve risk, greater than if the pregnancy were terminated, of injury to the physical or mental health of the pregnant woman”. This study aimed to investigate health professionals’ views on gestational age and acceptable termination of pregnancy for fetal anomaly (TOPFA). We undertook a questionnaire survey of UK health professionals working in fetal medicine, obstetrics and gynaecology and neonatology. A study pack consisting of a self-completion questionnaire, an invitation letter, participant information sheet, and a stamped addressed return envelope, were sent to health professionals. We used four fetal anomalies as case study examples in the questionnaire: isolated cleft lip, hypoplastic left heart, spina bifida and trisomy 21. These anomalies were chosen as they differed in terms of the type of anomaly, the type of impairment, and the perceived severity. Forty-one study packs were returned. For anomalies deemed less serious, later gestational ages were an important consideration when deciding acceptable TOPFA. The prognosis of an anomaly was considered an important factor in deciding whether a TOPFA was acceptable alongside gestational age. Clause C of the current UK legislation, which allows a legal termination prior to 24 weeks gestational age if continuing with the pregnancy would impact the mental health of the mother, was deemed a reasonable option for termination when parents are requesting a TOPFA. For each case study example, health professionals responded that TOPFA at ‘25 weeks and over’ was acceptable (cleft lip n = 1; hypoplastic left heart n = 19; spina bifida n = 13 and Trisomy 21 n = 10). Professionals also distinguished between their personal and professional views. These findings offer new insight into how gestational age considerations influence professionals’ conceptualisation of acceptable TOPFA.</description><subject>Abortion, Induced - ethics</subject><subject>Abortion, Induced - standards</subject><subject>Attitude</subject><subject>Congenital Abnormalities - psychology</subject><subject>Congenital Abnormalities - surgery</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Fetal Diseases - psychology</subject><subject>Fetal Diseases - surgery</subject><subject>Gestational Age</subject><subject>Health Personnel - ethics</subject><subject>Health Personnel - psychology</subject><subject>Health professionals</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Pregnancy</subject><subject>Termination of pregnancy</subject><subject>Termination of pregnancy for fetal anomaly</subject><subject>United Kingdom</subject><issn>1769-7212</issn><issn>1878-0849</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kMtu1DAUQC1ERUvhB1ggL9kkXDtObEtsqqo8pErdtGvLca6nGSX2YGcGzY7f4Pf4EpxOYcnKlnXuke8h5B2DmgHrPm5r3M6bmgNTNbQ1MPaCXDAlVQVK6JflLjtdSc74OXmd8xagUYzrV-Scayml0uqCHK5o3qcDHmn09BHttDzSXYoecx5jsFP-_fMXPYz4I9MYqHUOd4vtJ6QbzItdnhhqN0htGOiCaR7D0-uq2yXcBBvckfqYqMdlRUOc7XR8Q858kePb5_OSPHy-ub_-Wt3effl2fXVbOQGwVBZaIZlAwRQbZN9bdE6rZuDaAe-VdRqEAiu86B16LxVv0fcd0xy7plXQXJIPJ2_Z6fu-fNnMY3Y4TTZg3GfDQXDeMNapgvIT6lLMOaE3uzTONh0NA7P2Nluz9jZrbwOtKb3L0Ptn_76fcfg38jdwAT6dACxblo7JZDdicDiMCd1ihjj-z_8H4o-Ubg</recordid><startdate>201809</startdate><enddate>201809</enddate><creator>Crowe, Lisa</creator><creator>Graham, Ruth H.</creator><creator>Robson, Stephen C.</creator><creator>Rankin, Judith</creator><general>Elsevier Masson SAS</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201809</creationdate><title>A survey of health professionals’ views on acceptable gestational age and termination of pregnancy for fetal anomaly</title><author>Crowe, Lisa ; Graham, Ruth H. ; Robson, Stephen C. ; Rankin, Judith</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c400t-a054714e4181d7bbaecc983d29c02b8ac90480a4f4bceff7825efb6192e635803</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Abortion, Induced - ethics</topic><topic>Abortion, Induced - standards</topic><topic>Attitude</topic><topic>Congenital Abnormalities - psychology</topic><topic>Congenital Abnormalities - surgery</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Fetal Diseases - psychology</topic><topic>Fetal Diseases - surgery</topic><topic>Gestational Age</topic><topic>Health Personnel - ethics</topic><topic>Health Personnel - psychology</topic><topic>Health professionals</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Pregnancy</topic><topic>Termination of pregnancy</topic><topic>Termination of pregnancy for fetal anomaly</topic><topic>United Kingdom</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Crowe, Lisa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Graham, Ruth H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Robson, Stephen C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rankin, Judith</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>European journal of medical genetics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Crowe, Lisa</au><au>Graham, Ruth H.</au><au>Robson, Stephen C.</au><au>Rankin, Judith</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>A survey of health professionals’ views on acceptable gestational age and termination of pregnancy for fetal anomaly</atitle><jtitle>European journal of medical genetics</jtitle><addtitle>Eur J Med Genet</addtitle><date>2018-09</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>61</volume><issue>9</issue><spage>493</spage><epage>498</epage><pages>493-498</pages><issn>1769-7212</issn><eissn>1878-0849</eissn><abstract>Termination of pregnancy for fetal anomaly is legal in the UK with no upper limit, if two doctors, in good faith, agree “there is a substantial risk that if the child were born it would suffer from such physical or mental abnormalities as to be seriously handicapped”. This is Clause E of the Human Fertlisation and Embryology Act. The most commonly sighted Clause is C, which states “the pregnancy has not exceeded its twenty-fourth week and that the continuance of the pregnancy would involve risk, greater than if the pregnancy were terminated, of injury to the physical or mental health of the pregnant woman”. This study aimed to investigate health professionals’ views on gestational age and acceptable termination of pregnancy for fetal anomaly (TOPFA). We undertook a questionnaire survey of UK health professionals working in fetal medicine, obstetrics and gynaecology and neonatology. A study pack consisting of a self-completion questionnaire, an invitation letter, participant information sheet, and a stamped addressed return envelope, were sent to health professionals. We used four fetal anomalies as case study examples in the questionnaire: isolated cleft lip, hypoplastic left heart, spina bifida and trisomy 21. These anomalies were chosen as they differed in terms of the type of anomaly, the type of impairment, and the perceived severity. Forty-one study packs were returned. For anomalies deemed less serious, later gestational ages were an important consideration when deciding acceptable TOPFA. The prognosis of an anomaly was considered an important factor in deciding whether a TOPFA was acceptable alongside gestational age. Clause C of the current UK legislation, which allows a legal termination prior to 24 weeks gestational age if continuing with the pregnancy would impact the mental health of the mother, was deemed a reasonable option for termination when parents are requesting a TOPFA. For each case study example, health professionals responded that TOPFA at ‘25 weeks and over’ was acceptable (cleft lip n = 1; hypoplastic left heart n = 19; spina bifida n = 13 and Trisomy 21 n = 10). Professionals also distinguished between their personal and professional views. These findings offer new insight into how gestational age considerations influence professionals’ conceptualisation of acceptable TOPFA.</abstract><cop>Netherlands</cop><pub>Elsevier Masson SAS</pub><pmid>29777898</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.ejmg.2018.05.011</doi><tpages>6</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1769-7212
ispartof European journal of medical genetics, 2018-09, Vol.61 (9), p.493-498
issn 1769-7212
1878-0849
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2042231168
source MEDLINE; Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)
subjects Abortion, Induced - ethics
Abortion, Induced - standards
Attitude
Congenital Abnormalities - psychology
Congenital Abnormalities - surgery
Female
Fetal Diseases - psychology
Fetal Diseases - surgery
Gestational Age
Health Personnel - ethics
Health Personnel - psychology
Health professionals
Humans
Male
Pregnancy
Termination of pregnancy
Termination of pregnancy for fetal anomaly
United Kingdom
title A survey of health professionals’ views on acceptable gestational age and termination of pregnancy for fetal anomaly
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-29T08%3A54%3A46IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20survey%20of%20health%20professionals%E2%80%99%20views%20on%20acceptable%20gestational%20age%20and%20termination%20of%20pregnancy%20for%20fetal%20anomaly&rft.jtitle=European%20journal%20of%20medical%20genetics&rft.au=Crowe,%20Lisa&rft.date=2018-09&rft.volume=61&rft.issue=9&rft.spage=493&rft.epage=498&rft.pages=493-498&rft.issn=1769-7212&rft.eissn=1878-0849&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.ejmg.2018.05.011&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2042231168%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2042231168&rft_id=info:pmid/29777898&rft_els_id=S1769721218301782&rfr_iscdi=true