Field applications of the second‐generation Environmental Sample Processor (ESP) for remote detection of harmful algae: 2006‐2007

We assess the application of the second‐generation Environmental Sample Processor (ESP) for the detection of harmful algal bloom (HAB) species in field and laboratory settings using two molecular probe techniques: a sandwich hybridization assay (SHA) and fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH). Dur...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Limnology and oceanography, methods methods, 2008-12, Vol.6 (12), p.667-679
Hauptverfasser: Greenfield, Dianne I., Marin, Roman, Doucette, Gregory J., Mikulski, Christina, Jones, Kelly, Jensen, Scott, Roman, Brent, Alvarado, Nilo, Feldman, Jason, Scholin, Chris
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 679
container_issue 12
container_start_page 667
container_title Limnology and oceanography, methods
container_volume 6
creator Greenfield, Dianne I.
Marin, Roman
Doucette, Gregory J.
Mikulski, Christina
Jones, Kelly
Jensen, Scott
Roman, Brent
Alvarado, Nilo
Feldman, Jason
Scholin, Chris
description We assess the application of the second‐generation Environmental Sample Processor (ESP) for the detection of harmful algal bloom (HAB) species in field and laboratory settings using two molecular probe techniques: a sandwich hybridization assay (SHA) and fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH). During spring 2006, the first time this new instrument was deployed, the ESP successfully automated application of DNA probe arrays for various HAB species and other planktonic taxa, but non‐specific background binding on the SHA probe array support made results interpretation problematic. Following 2006, the DNA array support membrane that we were using was replaced with a different membrane, and the SHA chemistry was adjusted. The sensitivity and dynamic range of these modifications were assessed using 96‐well plate and ESP array SHA formats for several HAB species found commonly in Monterey Bay over a range of concentrations; responses were significantly correlated (p < 0.01). Modified arrays were deployed in 2007. Compared to 2006, probe arrays showed improved signal:noise, and remote detection of various HAB species was demonstrated. We confirmed that the ESP and affiliated assays can detect HAB populations at levels below those posing human health concerns, and results can be related to prevailing environmental conditions in near real‐time.
doi_str_mv 10.4319/lom.2008.6.667
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_20396176</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1780521772</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4587-c00aed25615abaf96faf3bb5e84c5a030eb30529d5083faa094ff7f704a7a1913</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkT1PwzAQhiMEEp8rsycEQ4OdxHbChlD5kIqoVJitq3OGICcOdgpiY2HnN_JLcCkDE0x3p3ve9056k2Sf0bTIWXVsXZtmlJapSIWQa8kW4wUb8ZKL9V_9ZrIdwiOlWVVIuZW8nzdoawJ9bxsNQ-O6QJwhwwOSgNp19efbxz126L93ZNw9N951LXYDWDKDtrdIpt5pDMF5cjieTY-IiZ3H1g1IahxQfyuj6QP41iwsAXsPeELiryK6xyJ3kw0DNuDeT91J7s7Ht2eXo8nNxdXZ6WSkC17KkaYUsM64YBzmYCphwOTzOcey0BxoTnGeU55VNadlbgBoVRgjjaQFSGAVy3eSg5Vv793TAsOg2iZotBY6dIugMppXgkkRwcM_QSbLeIhJmUU0XaHauxA8GtX7pgX_qhhVy2BUDEYtg1FCxWCioFwJXhqLr__QanJznS9HsZR-AeB_lKA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1780521772</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Field applications of the second‐generation Environmental Sample Processor (ESP) for remote detection of harmful algae: 2006‐2007</title><source>Wiley Free Content</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><creator>Greenfield, Dianne I. ; Marin, Roman ; Doucette, Gregory J. ; Mikulski, Christina ; Jones, Kelly ; Jensen, Scott ; Roman, Brent ; Alvarado, Nilo ; Feldman, Jason ; Scholin, Chris</creator><creatorcontrib>Greenfield, Dianne I. ; Marin, Roman ; Doucette, Gregory J. ; Mikulski, Christina ; Jones, Kelly ; Jensen, Scott ; Roman, Brent ; Alvarado, Nilo ; Feldman, Jason ; Scholin, Chris</creatorcontrib><description>We assess the application of the second‐generation Environmental Sample Processor (ESP) for the detection of harmful algal bloom (HAB) species in field and laboratory settings using two molecular probe techniques: a sandwich hybridization assay (SHA) and fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH). During spring 2006, the first time this new instrument was deployed, the ESP successfully automated application of DNA probe arrays for various HAB species and other planktonic taxa, but non‐specific background binding on the SHA probe array support made results interpretation problematic. Following 2006, the DNA array support membrane that we were using was replaced with a different membrane, and the SHA chemistry was adjusted. The sensitivity and dynamic range of these modifications were assessed using 96‐well plate and ESP array SHA formats for several HAB species found commonly in Monterey Bay over a range of concentrations; responses were significantly correlated (p &lt; 0.01). Modified arrays were deployed in 2007. Compared to 2006, probe arrays showed improved signal:noise, and remote detection of various HAB species was demonstrated. We confirmed that the ESP and affiliated assays can detect HAB populations at levels below those posing human health concerns, and results can be related to prevailing environmental conditions in near real‐time.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1541-5856</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1541-5856</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.4319/lom.2008.6.667</identifier><language>eng</language><subject>Marine</subject><ispartof>Limnology and oceanography, methods, 2008-12, Vol.6 (12), p.667-679</ispartof><rights>2008, by the Association for the Sciences of Limnology and Oceanography, Inc.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4587-c00aed25615abaf96faf3bb5e84c5a030eb30529d5083faa094ff7f704a7a1913</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.4319%2Flom.2008.6.667$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.4319%2Flom.2008.6.667$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1433,27924,27925,46409,46833</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Greenfield, Dianne I.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Marin, Roman</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Doucette, Gregory J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mikulski, Christina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jones, Kelly</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jensen, Scott</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Roman, Brent</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Alvarado, Nilo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Feldman, Jason</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Scholin, Chris</creatorcontrib><title>Field applications of the second‐generation Environmental Sample Processor (ESP) for remote detection of harmful algae: 2006‐2007</title><title>Limnology and oceanography, methods</title><description>We assess the application of the second‐generation Environmental Sample Processor (ESP) for the detection of harmful algal bloom (HAB) species in field and laboratory settings using two molecular probe techniques: a sandwich hybridization assay (SHA) and fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH). During spring 2006, the first time this new instrument was deployed, the ESP successfully automated application of DNA probe arrays for various HAB species and other planktonic taxa, but non‐specific background binding on the SHA probe array support made results interpretation problematic. Following 2006, the DNA array support membrane that we were using was replaced with a different membrane, and the SHA chemistry was adjusted. The sensitivity and dynamic range of these modifications were assessed using 96‐well plate and ESP array SHA formats for several HAB species found commonly in Monterey Bay over a range of concentrations; responses were significantly correlated (p &lt; 0.01). Modified arrays were deployed in 2007. Compared to 2006, probe arrays showed improved signal:noise, and remote detection of various HAB species was demonstrated. We confirmed that the ESP and affiliated assays can detect HAB populations at levels below those posing human health concerns, and results can be related to prevailing environmental conditions in near real‐time.</description><subject>Marine</subject><issn>1541-5856</issn><issn>1541-5856</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2008</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkT1PwzAQhiMEEp8rsycEQ4OdxHbChlD5kIqoVJitq3OGICcOdgpiY2HnN_JLcCkDE0x3p3ve9056k2Sf0bTIWXVsXZtmlJapSIWQa8kW4wUb8ZKL9V_9ZrIdwiOlWVVIuZW8nzdoawJ9bxsNQ-O6QJwhwwOSgNp19efbxz126L93ZNw9N951LXYDWDKDtrdIpt5pDMF5cjieTY-IiZ3H1g1IahxQfyuj6QP41iwsAXsPeELiryK6xyJ3kw0DNuDeT91J7s7Ht2eXo8nNxdXZ6WSkC17KkaYUsM64YBzmYCphwOTzOcey0BxoTnGeU55VNadlbgBoVRgjjaQFSGAVy3eSg5Vv793TAsOg2iZotBY6dIugMppXgkkRwcM_QSbLeIhJmUU0XaHauxA8GtX7pgX_qhhVy2BUDEYtg1FCxWCioFwJXhqLr__QanJznS9HsZR-AeB_lKA</recordid><startdate>200812</startdate><enddate>200812</enddate><creator>Greenfield, Dianne I.</creator><creator>Marin, Roman</creator><creator>Doucette, Gregory J.</creator><creator>Mikulski, Christina</creator><creator>Jones, Kelly</creator><creator>Jensen, Scott</creator><creator>Roman, Brent</creator><creator>Alvarado, Nilo</creator><creator>Feldman, Jason</creator><creator>Scholin, Chris</creator><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QH</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>H95</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7TN</scope><scope>H97</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200812</creationdate><title>Field applications of the second‐generation Environmental Sample Processor (ESP) for remote detection of harmful algae: 2006‐2007</title><author>Greenfield, Dianne I. ; Marin, Roman ; Doucette, Gregory J. ; Mikulski, Christina ; Jones, Kelly ; Jensen, Scott ; Roman, Brent ; Alvarado, Nilo ; Feldman, Jason ; Scholin, Chris</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4587-c00aed25615abaf96faf3bb5e84c5a030eb30529d5083faa094ff7f704a7a1913</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2008</creationdate><topic>Marine</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Greenfield, Dianne I.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Marin, Roman</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Doucette, Gregory J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mikulski, Christina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jones, Kelly</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jensen, Scott</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Roman, Brent</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Alvarado, Nilo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Feldman, Jason</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Scholin, Chris</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Aqualine</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 1: Biological Sciences &amp; Living Resources</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Oceanic Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 3: Aquatic Pollution &amp; Environmental Quality</collection><jtitle>Limnology and oceanography, methods</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Greenfield, Dianne I.</au><au>Marin, Roman</au><au>Doucette, Gregory J.</au><au>Mikulski, Christina</au><au>Jones, Kelly</au><au>Jensen, Scott</au><au>Roman, Brent</au><au>Alvarado, Nilo</au><au>Feldman, Jason</au><au>Scholin, Chris</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Field applications of the second‐generation Environmental Sample Processor (ESP) for remote detection of harmful algae: 2006‐2007</atitle><jtitle>Limnology and oceanography, methods</jtitle><date>2008-12</date><risdate>2008</risdate><volume>6</volume><issue>12</issue><spage>667</spage><epage>679</epage><pages>667-679</pages><issn>1541-5856</issn><eissn>1541-5856</eissn><abstract>We assess the application of the second‐generation Environmental Sample Processor (ESP) for the detection of harmful algal bloom (HAB) species in field and laboratory settings using two molecular probe techniques: a sandwich hybridization assay (SHA) and fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH). During spring 2006, the first time this new instrument was deployed, the ESP successfully automated application of DNA probe arrays for various HAB species and other planktonic taxa, but non‐specific background binding on the SHA probe array support made results interpretation problematic. Following 2006, the DNA array support membrane that we were using was replaced with a different membrane, and the SHA chemistry was adjusted. The sensitivity and dynamic range of these modifications were assessed using 96‐well plate and ESP array SHA formats for several HAB species found commonly in Monterey Bay over a range of concentrations; responses were significantly correlated (p &lt; 0.01). Modified arrays were deployed in 2007. Compared to 2006, probe arrays showed improved signal:noise, and remote detection of various HAB species was demonstrated. We confirmed that the ESP and affiliated assays can detect HAB populations at levels below those posing human health concerns, and results can be related to prevailing environmental conditions in near real‐time.</abstract><doi>10.4319/lom.2008.6.667</doi><tpages>13</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1541-5856
ispartof Limnology and oceanography, methods, 2008-12, Vol.6 (12), p.667-679
issn 1541-5856
1541-5856
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_20396176
source Wiley Free Content; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals
subjects Marine
title Field applications of the second‐generation Environmental Sample Processor (ESP) for remote detection of harmful algae: 2006‐2007
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-07T02%3A46%3A45IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Field%20applications%20of%20the%20second%E2%80%90generation%20Environmental%20Sample%20Processor%20(ESP)%20for%20remote%20detection%20of%20harmful%20algae:%202006%E2%80%902007&rft.jtitle=Limnology%20and%20oceanography,%20methods&rft.au=Greenfield,%20Dianne%20I.&rft.date=2008-12&rft.volume=6&rft.issue=12&rft.spage=667&rft.epage=679&rft.pages=667-679&rft.issn=1541-5856&rft.eissn=1541-5856&rft_id=info:doi/10.4319/lom.2008.6.667&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1780521772%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1780521772&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true