Proximal Versus Distal Continuous Adductor Canal Blocks: Does Varying Perineural Catheter Location Influence Analgesia? A Randomized, Subject-Masked, Controlled Clinical Trial

BACKGROUND:A continuous adductor canal block provides analgesia after surgical procedures of the knee. Recent neuroanatomic descriptions of the thigh and knee led us to speculate that local anesthetic deposited in the distal thigh close to the adductor hiatus would provide superior analgesia compare...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Anesthesia and analgesia 2018-07, Vol.127 (1), p.240-246
Hauptverfasser: Sztain, Jacklynn F., Khatibi, Bahareh, Monahan, Amanda M., Said, Engy T., Abramson, Wendy B., Gabriel, Rodney A., Finneran, John J., Bellars, Richard H., Nguyen, Patrick L., Ball, Scott T., Gonzales, Francis B., Ahmed, Sonya S., Donohue, Michael C., Padwal, Jennifer A., Ilfeld, Brian M.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 246
container_issue 1
container_start_page 240
container_title Anesthesia and analgesia
container_volume 127
creator Sztain, Jacklynn F.
Khatibi, Bahareh
Monahan, Amanda M.
Said, Engy T.
Abramson, Wendy B.
Gabriel, Rodney A.
Finneran, John J.
Bellars, Richard H.
Nguyen, Patrick L.
Ball, Scott T.
Gonzales, Francis B.
Ahmed, Sonya S.
Donohue, Michael C.
Padwal, Jennifer A.
Ilfeld, Brian M.
description BACKGROUND:A continuous adductor canal block provides analgesia after surgical procedures of the knee. Recent neuroanatomic descriptions of the thigh and knee led us to speculate that local anesthetic deposited in the distal thigh close to the adductor hiatus would provide superior analgesia compared to a more proximal catheter location. We therefore tested the hypothesis that during a continuous adductor canal nerve block, postoperative analgesia would be improved by placing the perineural catheter tip 2–3 cm cephalad to where the femoral artery descends posteriorly to the adductor hiatus (distal location) compared to a more proximal location at the midpoint between the anterior superior iliac spine and the superior border of the patella (proximal location). METHODS:Preoperatively, subjects undergoing total knee arthroplasty received an ultrasound-guided perineural catheter inserted either in the proximal or distal location within the adductor canal in a randomized, subject-masked fashion. Subjects received a single injection of lidocaine 2% via the catheter preoperatively, followed by an infusion of ropivacaine 0.2% (8 mL/h basal, 4 mL bolus, 30 minutes lockout) for the study duration. After joint closure, the surgeon infiltrated the entire joint using 30 mL of ropivacaine (0.5%), ketorolac (30 mg), epinephrine (5 μg/mL), and tranexamic acid (2 g). The primary end point was the median level of pain as measured on a numeric rating scale (NRS) during the time period of 8:00 AM to 12:00 PM the day after surgery. RESULTS:For the primary end point, the NRS of subjects with a catheter inserted at the proximal location (n = 24) was a median (10th, 25th–75th, 90th quartiles) of 0.5 (0.0, 0.0–3.2, 5.0) vs 3.0 (0.0, 2.0–5.4, 7.8) for subjects with a catheter inserted in the distal location (n = 26; P = .011). Median and maximum NRSs were lower in the proximal group at all other time points, but these differences did not reach statistical significance. There were no clinically relevant or statistically significant differences between the treatment groups for any other secondary end point, including opioid consumption and ambulation distance. CONCLUSIONS:For continuous adductor canal blocks accompanied by intraoperative periarticular local anesthetic infiltration, analgesia the day after knee arthroplasty is improved with a catheter inserted at the level of the midpoint between the anterior superior iliac spine and the superior border of the patella compared with a
doi_str_mv 10.1213/ANE.0000000000003422
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2038273767</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2038273767</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4472-7d50e67fb3df7795b46f4987b7887a72e08352201140beef732e291d873639973</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFUcFu1DAUtBCILoU_QMhHDqR17CS2uaCQtrTSFioovUZO8tJ112sXO1ZbfopfxGELQj2AJcua55l5em8QepmTvZzmbL_-eLhH_jqsoPQRWuQlrTJeSvEYLeZqRqWUO-hZCFcJ5kRUT9EOlbwklSwX6MeZd7d6owy-AB9iwAc6TAk1zk7aRpcq9TDEfnIeN8qmn_fG9evwFh84CPhC-TttL_EZeG0h-lmpphVM4PHS9WrSzuITO5oItgdcJ4NLCFq9wzX-rOzgNvo7DG_wl9hdQT9lpyqsZzy3984YGHBjtNV9Mj73Wpnn6MmoTIAX9-8u-np0eN4cZ8tPH06aepn1RcFpxoeSQMXHjg0j57LsimospOAdF4IrToEIVlJK8rwgHcDIGQUq80FwVjEpOdtFr7e-1959ixCmdqNDD8YoC2kpLSVMUM54NVOLLbX3LgQPY3vt00b9XZuTdo6qTVG1D6NKslf3HWK3geGP6Hc2iSC2hBtn0j7D2sQb8O0KlJlW__Mu_iH9xSuZzNL8gvAEsnQLwn4Ch3OwXw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2038273767</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Proximal Versus Distal Continuous Adductor Canal Blocks: Does Varying Perineural Catheter Location Influence Analgesia? A Randomized, Subject-Masked, Controlled Clinical Trial</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Journals@Ovid LWW Legacy Archive</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><creator>Sztain, Jacklynn F. ; Khatibi, Bahareh ; Monahan, Amanda M. ; Said, Engy T. ; Abramson, Wendy B. ; Gabriel, Rodney A. ; Finneran, John J. ; Bellars, Richard H. ; Nguyen, Patrick L. ; Ball, Scott T. ; Gonzales, Francis B. ; Ahmed, Sonya S. ; Donohue, Michael C. ; Padwal, Jennifer A. ; Ilfeld, Brian M.</creator><creatorcontrib>Sztain, Jacklynn F. ; Khatibi, Bahareh ; Monahan, Amanda M. ; Said, Engy T. ; Abramson, Wendy B. ; Gabriel, Rodney A. ; Finneran, John J. ; Bellars, Richard H. ; Nguyen, Patrick L. ; Ball, Scott T. ; Gonzales, Francis B. ; Ahmed, Sonya S. ; Donohue, Michael C. ; Padwal, Jennifer A. ; Ilfeld, Brian M.</creatorcontrib><description>BACKGROUND:A continuous adductor canal block provides analgesia after surgical procedures of the knee. Recent neuroanatomic descriptions of the thigh and knee led us to speculate that local anesthetic deposited in the distal thigh close to the adductor hiatus would provide superior analgesia compared to a more proximal catheter location. We therefore tested the hypothesis that during a continuous adductor canal nerve block, postoperative analgesia would be improved by placing the perineural catheter tip 2–3 cm cephalad to where the femoral artery descends posteriorly to the adductor hiatus (distal location) compared to a more proximal location at the midpoint between the anterior superior iliac spine and the superior border of the patella (proximal location). METHODS:Preoperatively, subjects undergoing total knee arthroplasty received an ultrasound-guided perineural catheter inserted either in the proximal or distal location within the adductor canal in a randomized, subject-masked fashion. Subjects received a single injection of lidocaine 2% via the catheter preoperatively, followed by an infusion of ropivacaine 0.2% (8 mL/h basal, 4 mL bolus, 30 minutes lockout) for the study duration. After joint closure, the surgeon infiltrated the entire joint using 30 mL of ropivacaine (0.5%), ketorolac (30 mg), epinephrine (5 μg/mL), and tranexamic acid (2 g). The primary end point was the median level of pain as measured on a numeric rating scale (NRS) during the time period of 8:00 AM to 12:00 PM the day after surgery. RESULTS:For the primary end point, the NRS of subjects with a catheter inserted at the proximal location (n = 24) was a median (10th, 25th–75th, 90th quartiles) of 0.5 (0.0, 0.0–3.2, 5.0) vs 3.0 (0.0, 2.0–5.4, 7.8) for subjects with a catheter inserted in the distal location (n = 26; P = .011). Median and maximum NRSs were lower in the proximal group at all other time points, but these differences did not reach statistical significance. There were no clinically relevant or statistically significant differences between the treatment groups for any other secondary end point, including opioid consumption and ambulation distance. CONCLUSIONS:For continuous adductor canal blocks accompanied by intraoperative periarticular local anesthetic infiltration, analgesia the day after knee arthroplasty is improved with a catheter inserted at the level of the midpoint between the anterior superior iliac spine and the superior border of the patella compared with a more distal insertion closer to the adductor hiatus.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0003-2999</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1526-7598</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000003422</identifier><identifier>PMID: 29750695</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: International Anesthesia Research Society</publisher><subject>Aged ; Anesthetics, Local - administration &amp; dosage ; Anesthetics, Local - adverse effects ; Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee - adverse effects ; California ; Catheters, Indwelling ; Equipment Design ; Female ; Humans ; Lidocaine - administration &amp; dosage ; Lidocaine - adverse effects ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Nerve Block - adverse effects ; Nerve Block - instrumentation ; Nerve Block - methods ; Pain Measurement ; Pain, Postoperative - diagnosis ; Pain, Postoperative - etiology ; Pain, Postoperative - prevention &amp; control ; Ropivacaine - administration &amp; dosage ; Ropivacaine - adverse effects ; Time Factors ; Treatment Outcome</subject><ispartof>Anesthesia and analgesia, 2018-07, Vol.127 (1), p.240-246</ispartof><rights>International Anesthesia Research Society</rights><rights>2018 International Anesthesia Research Society</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4472-7d50e67fb3df7795b46f4987b7887a72e08352201140beef732e291d873639973</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4472-7d50e67fb3df7795b46f4987b7887a72e08352201140beef732e291d873639973</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttp://ovidsp.ovid.com/ovidweb.cgi?T=JS&amp;NEWS=n&amp;CSC=Y&amp;PAGE=fulltext&amp;D=ovft&amp;AN=00000539-201807000-00040$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwolterskluwer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,4595,27905,27906,65212</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29750695$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Sztain, Jacklynn F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Khatibi, Bahareh</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Monahan, Amanda M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Said, Engy T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Abramson, Wendy B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gabriel, Rodney A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Finneran, John J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bellars, Richard H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nguyen, Patrick L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ball, Scott T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gonzales, Francis B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ahmed, Sonya S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Donohue, Michael C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Padwal, Jennifer A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ilfeld, Brian M.</creatorcontrib><title>Proximal Versus Distal Continuous Adductor Canal Blocks: Does Varying Perineural Catheter Location Influence Analgesia? A Randomized, Subject-Masked, Controlled Clinical Trial</title><title>Anesthesia and analgesia</title><addtitle>Anesth Analg</addtitle><description>BACKGROUND:A continuous adductor canal block provides analgesia after surgical procedures of the knee. Recent neuroanatomic descriptions of the thigh and knee led us to speculate that local anesthetic deposited in the distal thigh close to the adductor hiatus would provide superior analgesia compared to a more proximal catheter location. We therefore tested the hypothesis that during a continuous adductor canal nerve block, postoperative analgesia would be improved by placing the perineural catheter tip 2–3 cm cephalad to where the femoral artery descends posteriorly to the adductor hiatus (distal location) compared to a more proximal location at the midpoint between the anterior superior iliac spine and the superior border of the patella (proximal location). METHODS:Preoperatively, subjects undergoing total knee arthroplasty received an ultrasound-guided perineural catheter inserted either in the proximal or distal location within the adductor canal in a randomized, subject-masked fashion. Subjects received a single injection of lidocaine 2% via the catheter preoperatively, followed by an infusion of ropivacaine 0.2% (8 mL/h basal, 4 mL bolus, 30 minutes lockout) for the study duration. After joint closure, the surgeon infiltrated the entire joint using 30 mL of ropivacaine (0.5%), ketorolac (30 mg), epinephrine (5 μg/mL), and tranexamic acid (2 g). The primary end point was the median level of pain as measured on a numeric rating scale (NRS) during the time period of 8:00 AM to 12:00 PM the day after surgery. RESULTS:For the primary end point, the NRS of subjects with a catheter inserted at the proximal location (n = 24) was a median (10th, 25th–75th, 90th quartiles) of 0.5 (0.0, 0.0–3.2, 5.0) vs 3.0 (0.0, 2.0–5.4, 7.8) for subjects with a catheter inserted in the distal location (n = 26; P = .011). Median and maximum NRSs were lower in the proximal group at all other time points, but these differences did not reach statistical significance. There were no clinically relevant or statistically significant differences between the treatment groups for any other secondary end point, including opioid consumption and ambulation distance. CONCLUSIONS:For continuous adductor canal blocks accompanied by intraoperative periarticular local anesthetic infiltration, analgesia the day after knee arthroplasty is improved with a catheter inserted at the level of the midpoint between the anterior superior iliac spine and the superior border of the patella compared with a more distal insertion closer to the adductor hiatus.</description><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Anesthetics, Local - administration &amp; dosage</subject><subject>Anesthetics, Local - adverse effects</subject><subject>Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee - adverse effects</subject><subject>California</subject><subject>Catheters, Indwelling</subject><subject>Equipment Design</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Lidocaine - administration &amp; dosage</subject><subject>Lidocaine - adverse effects</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Nerve Block - adverse effects</subject><subject>Nerve Block - instrumentation</subject><subject>Nerve Block - methods</subject><subject>Pain Measurement</subject><subject>Pain, Postoperative - diagnosis</subject><subject>Pain, Postoperative - etiology</subject><subject>Pain, Postoperative - prevention &amp; control</subject><subject>Ropivacaine - administration &amp; dosage</subject><subject>Ropivacaine - adverse effects</subject><subject>Time Factors</subject><subject>Treatment Outcome</subject><issn>0003-2999</issn><issn>1526-7598</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFUcFu1DAUtBCILoU_QMhHDqR17CS2uaCQtrTSFioovUZO8tJ112sXO1ZbfopfxGELQj2AJcua55l5em8QepmTvZzmbL_-eLhH_jqsoPQRWuQlrTJeSvEYLeZqRqWUO-hZCFcJ5kRUT9EOlbwklSwX6MeZd7d6owy-AB9iwAc6TAk1zk7aRpcq9TDEfnIeN8qmn_fG9evwFh84CPhC-TttL_EZeG0h-lmpphVM4PHS9WrSzuITO5oItgdcJ4NLCFq9wzX-rOzgNvo7DG_wl9hdQT9lpyqsZzy3984YGHBjtNV9Mj73Wpnn6MmoTIAX9-8u-np0eN4cZ8tPH06aepn1RcFpxoeSQMXHjg0j57LsimospOAdF4IrToEIVlJK8rwgHcDIGQUq80FwVjEpOdtFr7e-1959ixCmdqNDD8YoC2kpLSVMUM54NVOLLbX3LgQPY3vt00b9XZuTdo6qTVG1D6NKslf3HWK3geGP6Hc2iSC2hBtn0j7D2sQb8O0KlJlW__Mu_iH9xSuZzNL8gvAEsnQLwn4Ch3OwXw</recordid><startdate>20180701</startdate><enddate>20180701</enddate><creator>Sztain, Jacklynn F.</creator><creator>Khatibi, Bahareh</creator><creator>Monahan, Amanda M.</creator><creator>Said, Engy T.</creator><creator>Abramson, Wendy B.</creator><creator>Gabriel, Rodney A.</creator><creator>Finneran, John J.</creator><creator>Bellars, Richard H.</creator><creator>Nguyen, Patrick L.</creator><creator>Ball, Scott T.</creator><creator>Gonzales, Francis B.</creator><creator>Ahmed, Sonya S.</creator><creator>Donohue, Michael C.</creator><creator>Padwal, Jennifer A.</creator><creator>Ilfeld, Brian M.</creator><general>International Anesthesia Research Society</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20180701</creationdate><title>Proximal Versus Distal Continuous Adductor Canal Blocks: Does Varying Perineural Catheter Location Influence Analgesia? A Randomized, Subject-Masked, Controlled Clinical Trial</title><author>Sztain, Jacklynn F. ; Khatibi, Bahareh ; Monahan, Amanda M. ; Said, Engy T. ; Abramson, Wendy B. ; Gabriel, Rodney A. ; Finneran, John J. ; Bellars, Richard H. ; Nguyen, Patrick L. ; Ball, Scott T. ; Gonzales, Francis B. ; Ahmed, Sonya S. ; Donohue, Michael C. ; Padwal, Jennifer A. ; Ilfeld, Brian M.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4472-7d50e67fb3df7795b46f4987b7887a72e08352201140beef732e291d873639973</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Anesthetics, Local - administration &amp; dosage</topic><topic>Anesthetics, Local - adverse effects</topic><topic>Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee - adverse effects</topic><topic>California</topic><topic>Catheters, Indwelling</topic><topic>Equipment Design</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Lidocaine - administration &amp; dosage</topic><topic>Lidocaine - adverse effects</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Nerve Block - adverse effects</topic><topic>Nerve Block - instrumentation</topic><topic>Nerve Block - methods</topic><topic>Pain Measurement</topic><topic>Pain, Postoperative - diagnosis</topic><topic>Pain, Postoperative - etiology</topic><topic>Pain, Postoperative - prevention &amp; control</topic><topic>Ropivacaine - administration &amp; dosage</topic><topic>Ropivacaine - adverse effects</topic><topic>Time Factors</topic><topic>Treatment Outcome</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Sztain, Jacklynn F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Khatibi, Bahareh</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Monahan, Amanda M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Said, Engy T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Abramson, Wendy B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gabriel, Rodney A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Finneran, John J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bellars, Richard H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nguyen, Patrick L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ball, Scott T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gonzales, Francis B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ahmed, Sonya S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Donohue, Michael C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Padwal, Jennifer A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ilfeld, Brian M.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Anesthesia and analgesia</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Sztain, Jacklynn F.</au><au>Khatibi, Bahareh</au><au>Monahan, Amanda M.</au><au>Said, Engy T.</au><au>Abramson, Wendy B.</au><au>Gabriel, Rodney A.</au><au>Finneran, John J.</au><au>Bellars, Richard H.</au><au>Nguyen, Patrick L.</au><au>Ball, Scott T.</au><au>Gonzales, Francis B.</au><au>Ahmed, Sonya S.</au><au>Donohue, Michael C.</au><au>Padwal, Jennifer A.</au><au>Ilfeld, Brian M.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Proximal Versus Distal Continuous Adductor Canal Blocks: Does Varying Perineural Catheter Location Influence Analgesia? A Randomized, Subject-Masked, Controlled Clinical Trial</atitle><jtitle>Anesthesia and analgesia</jtitle><addtitle>Anesth Analg</addtitle><date>2018-07-01</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>127</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>240</spage><epage>246</epage><pages>240-246</pages><issn>0003-2999</issn><eissn>1526-7598</eissn><abstract>BACKGROUND:A continuous adductor canal block provides analgesia after surgical procedures of the knee. Recent neuroanatomic descriptions of the thigh and knee led us to speculate that local anesthetic deposited in the distal thigh close to the adductor hiatus would provide superior analgesia compared to a more proximal catheter location. We therefore tested the hypothesis that during a continuous adductor canal nerve block, postoperative analgesia would be improved by placing the perineural catheter tip 2–3 cm cephalad to where the femoral artery descends posteriorly to the adductor hiatus (distal location) compared to a more proximal location at the midpoint between the anterior superior iliac spine and the superior border of the patella (proximal location). METHODS:Preoperatively, subjects undergoing total knee arthroplasty received an ultrasound-guided perineural catheter inserted either in the proximal or distal location within the adductor canal in a randomized, subject-masked fashion. Subjects received a single injection of lidocaine 2% via the catheter preoperatively, followed by an infusion of ropivacaine 0.2% (8 mL/h basal, 4 mL bolus, 30 minutes lockout) for the study duration. After joint closure, the surgeon infiltrated the entire joint using 30 mL of ropivacaine (0.5%), ketorolac (30 mg), epinephrine (5 μg/mL), and tranexamic acid (2 g). The primary end point was the median level of pain as measured on a numeric rating scale (NRS) during the time period of 8:00 AM to 12:00 PM the day after surgery. RESULTS:For the primary end point, the NRS of subjects with a catheter inserted at the proximal location (n = 24) was a median (10th, 25th–75th, 90th quartiles) of 0.5 (0.0, 0.0–3.2, 5.0) vs 3.0 (0.0, 2.0–5.4, 7.8) for subjects with a catheter inserted in the distal location (n = 26; P = .011). Median and maximum NRSs were lower in the proximal group at all other time points, but these differences did not reach statistical significance. There were no clinically relevant or statistically significant differences between the treatment groups for any other secondary end point, including opioid consumption and ambulation distance. CONCLUSIONS:For continuous adductor canal blocks accompanied by intraoperative periarticular local anesthetic infiltration, analgesia the day after knee arthroplasty is improved with a catheter inserted at the level of the midpoint between the anterior superior iliac spine and the superior border of the patella compared with a more distal insertion closer to the adductor hiatus.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>International Anesthesia Research Society</pub><pmid>29750695</pmid><doi>10.1213/ANE.0000000000003422</doi><tpages>7</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0003-2999
ispartof Anesthesia and analgesia, 2018-07, Vol.127 (1), p.240-246
issn 0003-2999
1526-7598
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2038273767
source MEDLINE; Journals@Ovid LWW Legacy Archive; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals
subjects Aged
Anesthetics, Local - administration & dosage
Anesthetics, Local - adverse effects
Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee - adverse effects
California
Catheters, Indwelling
Equipment Design
Female
Humans
Lidocaine - administration & dosage
Lidocaine - adverse effects
Male
Middle Aged
Nerve Block - adverse effects
Nerve Block - instrumentation
Nerve Block - methods
Pain Measurement
Pain, Postoperative - diagnosis
Pain, Postoperative - etiology
Pain, Postoperative - prevention & control
Ropivacaine - administration & dosage
Ropivacaine - adverse effects
Time Factors
Treatment Outcome
title Proximal Versus Distal Continuous Adductor Canal Blocks: Does Varying Perineural Catheter Location Influence Analgesia? A Randomized, Subject-Masked, Controlled Clinical Trial
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-20T13%3A09%3A26IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Proximal%20Versus%20Distal%20Continuous%20Adductor%20Canal%20Blocks:%20Does%20Varying%20Perineural%20Catheter%20Location%20Influence%20Analgesia?%20A%20Randomized,%20Subject-Masked,%20Controlled%20Clinical%20Trial&rft.jtitle=Anesthesia%20and%20analgesia&rft.au=Sztain,%20Jacklynn%20F.&rft.date=2018-07-01&rft.volume=127&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=240&rft.epage=246&rft.pages=240-246&rft.issn=0003-2999&rft.eissn=1526-7598&rft_id=info:doi/10.1213/ANE.0000000000003422&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2038273767%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2038273767&rft_id=info:pmid/29750695&rfr_iscdi=true