The opportunity cost of time modulates cognitive effort

A spate of recent work demonstrates that humans seek to avoid the expenditure of cognitive effort, much like physical effort or economic resources. Less is clear, however, about the circumstances dictating how and when people decide to expend cognitive effort. Here we adopt a popular theory of oppor...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Neuropsychologia 2019-02, Vol.123, p.92-105
Hauptverfasser: Otto, A. Ross, Daw, Nathaniel D.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 105
container_issue
container_start_page 92
container_title Neuropsychologia
container_volume 123
creator Otto, A. Ross
Daw, Nathaniel D.
description A spate of recent work demonstrates that humans seek to avoid the expenditure of cognitive effort, much like physical effort or economic resources. Less is clear, however, about the circumstances dictating how and when people decide to expend cognitive effort. Here we adopt a popular theory of opportunity costs and response vigor and to elucidate this question. This account, grounded in Reinforcement Learning, formalizes a trade-off between two costs: the harder work assumed necessary to emit faster actions and the opportunity cost inherent in acting more slowly (i.e., the delay that results to the next reward and subsequent rewards). Recent work reveals that the opportunity cost of time—operationalized as the average reward rate per unit time, theorized to be signaled by tonic dopamine levels, modulates the speed with which a person responds in a simple discrimination tasks. We extend this framework to cognitive effort in a diverse range of cognitive tasks, for which 1) the amount of cognitive effort demanded from the task varies from trial to trial and 2) the putative expenditure of cognitive effort holds measureable consequences in terms of accuracy and response time. In the domains of cognitive control, perceptual decision-making, and task-switching, we found that subjects tuned their level of effort exertion in accordance with the experienced average reward rate: when the opportunity cost of time was high, subjects made more errors and responded more quickly, which we interpret as a withdrawal of cognitive effort. That is, expenditure of cognitive effort appeared to be modulated by the opportunity cost of time. Further, and consistent with our account, the strength of this modulation was predicted by individual differences in efficacy of cognitive control. Taken together, our results elucidate the circumstances dictating how and when people expend cognitive effort. •People overall tend to avoid the expenditure of cognitive effort.•Little is known about when and why people decide to withhold cognitive effort.•Theories of response vigor suggest that the cost of time dictates level of effort.•In 3 cognitive task domains, this cost drives down cognitive effort investment.•Individual differences in cognitive control predict the strength of this modulation.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2018.05.006
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2038272284</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0028393218302021</els_id><sourcerecordid>2038272284</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c448t-dcdc8965ab36d0029b1b18c60ffdecdf8d7461fb176ad1f013a71fab27f6937b3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkEtL7TAQgIMoeq76F6QrcdM6Sdom3QgiPi4IbnQd0mSiObQnNWmF8--NHL2Lu3I1MPPN6yPknEJFgbaX62qDSwxT2pq3MIRXrysGVFbQVADtHllRKXjJG1rvkxUAkyXvODsif1JaA0DdMHlIjlgnGuikWBHx_IZFmKYQ52Xj521hQpqL4IrZj1iMwS6DnjHl9Gsu-w8s0LkMn5ADp4eEp9_xmLzc3T7fPJSPT_d_b64fS1PXci6tsUZ2baN73tp8TtfTnkrTgnMWjXXSirqlrqei1ZY6oFwL6nTPhGs7Lnp-TC52c6cY3hdMsxp9MjgMeoNhSYoBl0wwJuuMXu1QE0NKEZ2aoh913CoK6kueWqv_5akveQoaleXlAWffu5Z-RPuv_cdWBh52AOaPPzxGlYzHjUHrI5pZ2eB_u-sTftOMXw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2038272284</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The opportunity cost of time modulates cognitive effort</title><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Otto, A. Ross ; Daw, Nathaniel D.</creator><creatorcontrib>Otto, A. Ross ; Daw, Nathaniel D.</creatorcontrib><description>A spate of recent work demonstrates that humans seek to avoid the expenditure of cognitive effort, much like physical effort or economic resources. Less is clear, however, about the circumstances dictating how and when people decide to expend cognitive effort. Here we adopt a popular theory of opportunity costs and response vigor and to elucidate this question. This account, grounded in Reinforcement Learning, formalizes a trade-off between two costs: the harder work assumed necessary to emit faster actions and the opportunity cost inherent in acting more slowly (i.e., the delay that results to the next reward and subsequent rewards). Recent work reveals that the opportunity cost of time—operationalized as the average reward rate per unit time, theorized to be signaled by tonic dopamine levels, modulates the speed with which a person responds in a simple discrimination tasks. We extend this framework to cognitive effort in a diverse range of cognitive tasks, for which 1) the amount of cognitive effort demanded from the task varies from trial to trial and 2) the putative expenditure of cognitive effort holds measureable consequences in terms of accuracy and response time. In the domains of cognitive control, perceptual decision-making, and task-switching, we found that subjects tuned their level of effort exertion in accordance with the experienced average reward rate: when the opportunity cost of time was high, subjects made more errors and responded more quickly, which we interpret as a withdrawal of cognitive effort. That is, expenditure of cognitive effort appeared to be modulated by the opportunity cost of time. Further, and consistent with our account, the strength of this modulation was predicted by individual differences in efficacy of cognitive control. Taken together, our results elucidate the circumstances dictating how and when people expend cognitive effort. •People overall tend to avoid the expenditure of cognitive effort.•Little is known about when and why people decide to withhold cognitive effort.•Theories of response vigor suggest that the cost of time dictates level of effort.•In 3 cognitive task domains, this cost drives down cognitive effort investment.•Individual differences in cognitive control predict the strength of this modulation.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0028-3932</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-3514</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2018.05.006</identifier><identifier>PMID: 29750987</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Cognitive control ; Cognitive effort ; Decision-making</subject><ispartof>Neuropsychologia, 2019-02, Vol.123, p.92-105</ispartof><rights>2018 Elsevier Ltd</rights><rights>Copyright © 2018 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c448t-dcdc8965ab36d0029b1b18c60ffdecdf8d7461fb176ad1f013a71fab27f6937b3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c448t-dcdc8965ab36d0029b1b18c60ffdecdf8d7461fb176ad1f013a71fab27f6937b3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0028393218302021$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,27901,27902,65306</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29750987$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Otto, A. Ross</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Daw, Nathaniel D.</creatorcontrib><title>The opportunity cost of time modulates cognitive effort</title><title>Neuropsychologia</title><addtitle>Neuropsychologia</addtitle><description>A spate of recent work demonstrates that humans seek to avoid the expenditure of cognitive effort, much like physical effort or economic resources. Less is clear, however, about the circumstances dictating how and when people decide to expend cognitive effort. Here we adopt a popular theory of opportunity costs and response vigor and to elucidate this question. This account, grounded in Reinforcement Learning, formalizes a trade-off between two costs: the harder work assumed necessary to emit faster actions and the opportunity cost inherent in acting more slowly (i.e., the delay that results to the next reward and subsequent rewards). Recent work reveals that the opportunity cost of time—operationalized as the average reward rate per unit time, theorized to be signaled by tonic dopamine levels, modulates the speed with which a person responds in a simple discrimination tasks. We extend this framework to cognitive effort in a diverse range of cognitive tasks, for which 1) the amount of cognitive effort demanded from the task varies from trial to trial and 2) the putative expenditure of cognitive effort holds measureable consequences in terms of accuracy and response time. In the domains of cognitive control, perceptual decision-making, and task-switching, we found that subjects tuned their level of effort exertion in accordance with the experienced average reward rate: when the opportunity cost of time was high, subjects made more errors and responded more quickly, which we interpret as a withdrawal of cognitive effort. That is, expenditure of cognitive effort appeared to be modulated by the opportunity cost of time. Further, and consistent with our account, the strength of this modulation was predicted by individual differences in efficacy of cognitive control. Taken together, our results elucidate the circumstances dictating how and when people expend cognitive effort. •People overall tend to avoid the expenditure of cognitive effort.•Little is known about when and why people decide to withhold cognitive effort.•Theories of response vigor suggest that the cost of time dictates level of effort.•In 3 cognitive task domains, this cost drives down cognitive effort investment.•Individual differences in cognitive control predict the strength of this modulation.</description><subject>Cognitive control</subject><subject>Cognitive effort</subject><subject>Decision-making</subject><issn>0028-3932</issn><issn>1873-3514</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqNkEtL7TAQgIMoeq76F6QrcdM6Sdom3QgiPi4IbnQd0mSiObQnNWmF8--NHL2Lu3I1MPPN6yPknEJFgbaX62qDSwxT2pq3MIRXrysGVFbQVADtHllRKXjJG1rvkxUAkyXvODsif1JaA0DdMHlIjlgnGuikWBHx_IZFmKYQ52Xj521hQpqL4IrZj1iMwS6DnjHl9Gsu-w8s0LkMn5ADp4eEp9_xmLzc3T7fPJSPT_d_b64fS1PXci6tsUZ2baN73tp8TtfTnkrTgnMWjXXSirqlrqei1ZY6oFwL6nTPhGs7Lnp-TC52c6cY3hdMsxp9MjgMeoNhSYoBl0wwJuuMXu1QE0NKEZ2aoh913CoK6kueWqv_5akveQoaleXlAWffu5Z-RPuv_cdWBh52AOaPPzxGlYzHjUHrI5pZ2eB_u-sTftOMXw</recordid><startdate>20190204</startdate><enddate>20190204</enddate><creator>Otto, A. Ross</creator><creator>Daw, Nathaniel D.</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20190204</creationdate><title>The opportunity cost of time modulates cognitive effort</title><author>Otto, A. Ross ; Daw, Nathaniel D.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c448t-dcdc8965ab36d0029b1b18c60ffdecdf8d7461fb176ad1f013a71fab27f6937b3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Cognitive control</topic><topic>Cognitive effort</topic><topic>Decision-making</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Otto, A. Ross</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Daw, Nathaniel D.</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Neuropsychologia</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Otto, A. Ross</au><au>Daw, Nathaniel D.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The opportunity cost of time modulates cognitive effort</atitle><jtitle>Neuropsychologia</jtitle><addtitle>Neuropsychologia</addtitle><date>2019-02-04</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>123</volume><spage>92</spage><epage>105</epage><pages>92-105</pages><issn>0028-3932</issn><eissn>1873-3514</eissn><abstract>A spate of recent work demonstrates that humans seek to avoid the expenditure of cognitive effort, much like physical effort or economic resources. Less is clear, however, about the circumstances dictating how and when people decide to expend cognitive effort. Here we adopt a popular theory of opportunity costs and response vigor and to elucidate this question. This account, grounded in Reinforcement Learning, formalizes a trade-off between two costs: the harder work assumed necessary to emit faster actions and the opportunity cost inherent in acting more slowly (i.e., the delay that results to the next reward and subsequent rewards). Recent work reveals that the opportunity cost of time—operationalized as the average reward rate per unit time, theorized to be signaled by tonic dopamine levels, modulates the speed with which a person responds in a simple discrimination tasks. We extend this framework to cognitive effort in a diverse range of cognitive tasks, for which 1) the amount of cognitive effort demanded from the task varies from trial to trial and 2) the putative expenditure of cognitive effort holds measureable consequences in terms of accuracy and response time. In the domains of cognitive control, perceptual decision-making, and task-switching, we found that subjects tuned their level of effort exertion in accordance with the experienced average reward rate: when the opportunity cost of time was high, subjects made more errors and responded more quickly, which we interpret as a withdrawal of cognitive effort. That is, expenditure of cognitive effort appeared to be modulated by the opportunity cost of time. Further, and consistent with our account, the strength of this modulation was predicted by individual differences in efficacy of cognitive control. Taken together, our results elucidate the circumstances dictating how and when people expend cognitive effort. •People overall tend to avoid the expenditure of cognitive effort.•Little is known about when and why people decide to withhold cognitive effort.•Theories of response vigor suggest that the cost of time dictates level of effort.•In 3 cognitive task domains, this cost drives down cognitive effort investment.•Individual differences in cognitive control predict the strength of this modulation.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>29750987</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2018.05.006</doi><tpages>14</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0028-3932
ispartof Neuropsychologia, 2019-02, Vol.123, p.92-105
issn 0028-3932
1873-3514
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2038272284
source Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals
subjects Cognitive control
Cognitive effort
Decision-making
title The opportunity cost of time modulates cognitive effort
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-06T20%3A55%3A43IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20opportunity%20cost%20of%20time%20modulates%20cognitive%20effort&rft.jtitle=Neuropsychologia&rft.au=Otto,%20A.%20Ross&rft.date=2019-02-04&rft.volume=123&rft.spage=92&rft.epage=105&rft.pages=92-105&rft.issn=0028-3932&rft.eissn=1873-3514&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2018.05.006&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2038272284%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2038272284&rft_id=info:pmid/29750987&rft_els_id=S0028393218302021&rfr_iscdi=true