Survival and Cause-Specific Mortality of Male Mule Deer Under Different Hunting Regulations in the Bridger Mountains, Montana

We selected 2 adjacent populations of mule deer (Odocoileus hemionus hemionus) in the Bridger Mountains, Montana, USA, to measure effects on survival rates and causes of mortality of 2 hunting regulations designed to enhance representation of mature males. We compared male survival between the West...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The Journal of wildlife management 2007-05, Vol.71 (3), p.816-827
Hauptverfasser: PAC, DAVID F, WHITE, GARY C
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 827
container_issue 3
container_start_page 816
container_title The Journal of wildlife management
container_volume 71
creator PAC, DAVID F
WHITE, GARY C
description We selected 2 adjacent populations of mule deer (Odocoileus hemionus hemionus) in the Bridger Mountains, Montana, USA, to measure effects on survival rates and causes of mortality of 2 hunting regulations designed to enhance representation of mature males. We compared male survival between the West Slope and South 16 Mile populations considering both hunting and nonhunting sources of mortality with respect to age (fawn, yearling, and mature), month (Jun–May), and year (1990–1995). Harvest rates of mature males were greater than for yearlings, demonstrating hunter preferences. We found no differences in yearling monthly survival rates between October and November or between areas or years. In contrast, we found survival of mature males differed between October and November and across years and study areas. During these months, survival rates of mature males averaged 0.602 on the West Slope under the 2-point regulation and 0.762 on South 16 Mile under the outfitted hunt. Monthly survival during summer also differed by age class, but not area, with estimates of 0.963 for yearling males, and corresponding mature male survival estimates of 0.991, demonstrating greater yearling summer mortality. Winter survival rates of yearlings and matures were similar for both areas with a monthly estimate of 0.986. We found differences in spring monthly survival estimates for the 2 areas, mainly for matures. Yearling male monthly survival estimates were 0.959 and 0.958 for the 2 areas, whereas corresponding mature male estimates during spring were 0.991 and 0.936 on the West Slope and South 16 Mile, respectively. Fawn survival rates varied from 0.101 to 0.770 among years and between areas overwinter. Cumulative effects of nonhunting mortality among all age classes reduced the effectiveness of 2 hunting regulations designed to enhance survival of males to age classes ≥4 years associated with maximum antler development despite accomplishing reductions in harvest rates. Low and variable fawn survival and relatively high nonhunting-related losses of yearling and mature males might be typical of many populations in the Northern Rocky Mountains. Deer managers should avoid populations coexisting with a diversity of large predators in environments with strong year effects when considering opportunities for implementing harvest regulations to improve representation of mature males.
doi_str_mv 10.2193/2005-713
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_20381653</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>4495258</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>4495258</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-b5037-ca1d0c87f3578ac5b2a0921a1edaf69736a384c0814153799762c4060eb396683</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp10Utv1DAQAOAIgcRSkPgBSFgcEAcCfsSvI2xhC92AYFm1N2s2cRYvqb3YSWEP_HdcBbUSUi_jsfxpNOMpiscEv6JEs9cUY15Kwu4Us3yVJVVE3i1mGFNa8oqc3y8epLTDmBGixKz4sxrjpbuEHoFv0RzGZMvV3jaucw2qQxygd8MBhQ7V0FtUjzkcWxvR2rc5Hruus9H6AZ2MfnB-i77a7djD4IJPyHk0fLfobXTtNuM6ZAPOp5c5zZmHh8W9DvpkH_07j4r1-3ff5ifl8vPiw_zNstxwnGdogLS4UbJjXCpo-IYC1pQAsS10QksmgKmqwYpUhDOptRS0qbDAdsO0EIodFc-nuvsYfo42DebCpcb2PXgbxmQoZooIzjJ89h_chTH63JuhrKKkopXO6MWEmhhSirYz--guIB4MweZqCeZqCSYvIdNyor9cbw-3OvPxrF4oLrN_MvldGkK89lWlOeXqppxLg_19_QzxhxGSSW7OPi0MP_1yfrok2pDsn06-g2BgG10y6xXFhGGsqNBE3_zMxoXg7e2T_AXcsbMO</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>234214249</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Survival and Cause-Specific Mortality of Male Mule Deer Under Different Hunting Regulations in the Bridger Mountains, Montana</title><source>Wiley Journals</source><source>JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing</source><creator>PAC, DAVID F ; WHITE, GARY C</creator><creatorcontrib>PAC, DAVID F ; WHITE, GARY C</creatorcontrib><description>We selected 2 adjacent populations of mule deer (Odocoileus hemionus hemionus) in the Bridger Mountains, Montana, USA, to measure effects on survival rates and causes of mortality of 2 hunting regulations designed to enhance representation of mature males. We compared male survival between the West Slope and South 16 Mile populations considering both hunting and nonhunting sources of mortality with respect to age (fawn, yearling, and mature), month (Jun–May), and year (1990–1995). Harvest rates of mature males were greater than for yearlings, demonstrating hunter preferences. We found no differences in yearling monthly survival rates between October and November or between areas or years. In contrast, we found survival of mature males differed between October and November and across years and study areas. During these months, survival rates of mature males averaged 0.602 on the West Slope under the 2-point regulation and 0.762 on South 16 Mile under the outfitted hunt. Monthly survival during summer also differed by age class, but not area, with estimates of 0.963 for yearling males, and corresponding mature male survival estimates of 0.991, demonstrating greater yearling summer mortality. Winter survival rates of yearlings and matures were similar for both areas with a monthly estimate of 0.986. We found differences in spring monthly survival estimates for the 2 areas, mainly for matures. Yearling male monthly survival estimates were 0.959 and 0.958 for the 2 areas, whereas corresponding mature male estimates during spring were 0.991 and 0.936 on the West Slope and South 16 Mile, respectively. Fawn survival rates varied from 0.101 to 0.770 among years and between areas overwinter. Cumulative effects of nonhunting mortality among all age classes reduced the effectiveness of 2 hunting regulations designed to enhance survival of males to age classes ≥4 years associated with maximum antler development despite accomplishing reductions in harvest rates. Low and variable fawn survival and relatively high nonhunting-related losses of yearling and mature males might be typical of many populations in the Northern Rocky Mountains. Deer managers should avoid populations coexisting with a diversity of large predators in environments with strong year effects when considering opportunities for implementing harvest regulations to improve representation of mature males.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0022-541X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1937-2817</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.2193/2005-713</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JWMAA9</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford, UK: The Wildlife Society</publisher><subject>adult animals ; Animal behavior ; Data analysis ; Deer ; Deer hunting ; Fawns ; Federal funding ; Females ; fish and wildlife law ; forests ; game animals ; harvest ; hunting regulations ; male mule deer ; Males ; Montana ; Mortality ; Mountains ; Mule deer ; nonhunting mortality ; Odocoileus hemionus ; Odocoileus hemionus hemionus ; population ; population dynamics ; predation ; Predators ; Program MARK ; Public lands ; radio frequency identification ; radiocollars ; Regulation ; Research s ; seasonal variation ; Sloping terrain ; sport hunting ; Spring ; Summer ; Survival ; Survival rates ; wild animals ; wildlife habitats ; Wildlife management ; Winter ; Yearlings</subject><ispartof>The Journal of wildlife management, 2007-05, Vol.71 (3), p.816-827</ispartof><rights>Copyright 2007 The Wildlife Society</rights><rights>2007 The Wildlife Society</rights><rights>Copyright Alliance Communications Group, A Division of Allen Press, Inc. May 2007</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-b5037-ca1d0c87f3578ac5b2a0921a1edaf69736a384c0814153799762c4060eb396683</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-b5037-ca1d0c87f3578ac5b2a0921a1edaf69736a384c0814153799762c4060eb396683</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/4495258$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/4495258$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,803,1417,27924,27925,45574,45575,58017,58250</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>PAC, DAVID F</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>WHITE, GARY C</creatorcontrib><title>Survival and Cause-Specific Mortality of Male Mule Deer Under Different Hunting Regulations in the Bridger Mountains, Montana</title><title>The Journal of wildlife management</title><description>We selected 2 adjacent populations of mule deer (Odocoileus hemionus hemionus) in the Bridger Mountains, Montana, USA, to measure effects on survival rates and causes of mortality of 2 hunting regulations designed to enhance representation of mature males. We compared male survival between the West Slope and South 16 Mile populations considering both hunting and nonhunting sources of mortality with respect to age (fawn, yearling, and mature), month (Jun–May), and year (1990–1995). Harvest rates of mature males were greater than for yearlings, demonstrating hunter preferences. We found no differences in yearling monthly survival rates between October and November or between areas or years. In contrast, we found survival of mature males differed between October and November and across years and study areas. During these months, survival rates of mature males averaged 0.602 on the West Slope under the 2-point regulation and 0.762 on South 16 Mile under the outfitted hunt. Monthly survival during summer also differed by age class, but not area, with estimates of 0.963 for yearling males, and corresponding mature male survival estimates of 0.991, demonstrating greater yearling summer mortality. Winter survival rates of yearlings and matures were similar for both areas with a monthly estimate of 0.986. We found differences in spring monthly survival estimates for the 2 areas, mainly for matures. Yearling male monthly survival estimates were 0.959 and 0.958 for the 2 areas, whereas corresponding mature male estimates during spring were 0.991 and 0.936 on the West Slope and South 16 Mile, respectively. Fawn survival rates varied from 0.101 to 0.770 among years and between areas overwinter. Cumulative effects of nonhunting mortality among all age classes reduced the effectiveness of 2 hunting regulations designed to enhance survival of males to age classes ≥4 years associated with maximum antler development despite accomplishing reductions in harvest rates. Low and variable fawn survival and relatively high nonhunting-related losses of yearling and mature males might be typical of many populations in the Northern Rocky Mountains. Deer managers should avoid populations coexisting with a diversity of large predators in environments with strong year effects when considering opportunities for implementing harvest regulations to improve representation of mature males.</description><subject>adult animals</subject><subject>Animal behavior</subject><subject>Data analysis</subject><subject>Deer</subject><subject>Deer hunting</subject><subject>Fawns</subject><subject>Federal funding</subject><subject>Females</subject><subject>fish and wildlife law</subject><subject>forests</subject><subject>game animals</subject><subject>harvest</subject><subject>hunting regulations</subject><subject>male mule deer</subject><subject>Males</subject><subject>Montana</subject><subject>Mortality</subject><subject>Mountains</subject><subject>Mule deer</subject><subject>nonhunting mortality</subject><subject>Odocoileus hemionus</subject><subject>Odocoileus hemionus hemionus</subject><subject>population</subject><subject>population dynamics</subject><subject>predation</subject><subject>Predators</subject><subject>Program MARK</subject><subject>Public lands</subject><subject>radio frequency identification</subject><subject>radiocollars</subject><subject>Regulation</subject><subject>Research s</subject><subject>seasonal variation</subject><subject>Sloping terrain</subject><subject>sport hunting</subject><subject>Spring</subject><subject>Summer</subject><subject>Survival</subject><subject>Survival rates</subject><subject>wild animals</subject><subject>wildlife habitats</subject><subject>Wildlife management</subject><subject>Winter</subject><subject>Yearlings</subject><issn>0022-541X</issn><issn>1937-2817</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2007</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNp10Utv1DAQAOAIgcRSkPgBSFgcEAcCfsSvI2xhC92AYFm1N2s2cRYvqb3YSWEP_HdcBbUSUi_jsfxpNOMpiscEv6JEs9cUY15Kwu4Us3yVJVVE3i1mGFNa8oqc3y8epLTDmBGixKz4sxrjpbuEHoFv0RzGZMvV3jaucw2qQxygd8MBhQ7V0FtUjzkcWxvR2rc5Hruus9H6AZ2MfnB-i77a7djD4IJPyHk0fLfobXTtNuM6ZAPOp5c5zZmHh8W9DvpkH_07j4r1-3ff5ifl8vPiw_zNstxwnGdogLS4UbJjXCpo-IYC1pQAsS10QksmgKmqwYpUhDOptRS0qbDAdsO0EIodFc-nuvsYfo42DebCpcb2PXgbxmQoZooIzjJ89h_chTH63JuhrKKkopXO6MWEmhhSirYz--guIB4MweZqCeZqCSYvIdNyor9cbw-3OvPxrF4oLrN_MvldGkK89lWlOeXqppxLg_19_QzxhxGSSW7OPi0MP_1yfrok2pDsn06-g2BgG10y6xXFhGGsqNBE3_zMxoXg7e2T_AXcsbMO</recordid><startdate>200705</startdate><enddate>200705</enddate><creator>PAC, DAVID F</creator><creator>WHITE, GARY C</creator><general>The Wildlife Society</general><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>FBQ</scope><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>7U6</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88A</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>BKSAR</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PADUT</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PCBAR</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>R05</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200705</creationdate><title>Survival and Cause-Specific Mortality of Male Mule Deer Under Different Hunting Regulations in the Bridger Mountains, Montana</title><author>PAC, DAVID F ; WHITE, GARY C</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-b5037-ca1d0c87f3578ac5b2a0921a1edaf69736a384c0814153799762c4060eb396683</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2007</creationdate><topic>adult animals</topic><topic>Animal behavior</topic><topic>Data analysis</topic><topic>Deer</topic><topic>Deer hunting</topic><topic>Fawns</topic><topic>Federal funding</topic><topic>Females</topic><topic>fish and wildlife law</topic><topic>forests</topic><topic>game animals</topic><topic>harvest</topic><topic>hunting regulations</topic><topic>male mule deer</topic><topic>Males</topic><topic>Montana</topic><topic>Mortality</topic><topic>Mountains</topic><topic>Mule deer</topic><topic>nonhunting mortality</topic><topic>Odocoileus hemionus</topic><topic>Odocoileus hemionus hemionus</topic><topic>population</topic><topic>population dynamics</topic><topic>predation</topic><topic>Predators</topic><topic>Program MARK</topic><topic>Public lands</topic><topic>radio frequency identification</topic><topic>radiocollars</topic><topic>Regulation</topic><topic>Research s</topic><topic>seasonal variation</topic><topic>Sloping terrain</topic><topic>sport hunting</topic><topic>Spring</topic><topic>Summer</topic><topic>Survival</topic><topic>Survival rates</topic><topic>wild animals</topic><topic>wildlife habitats</topic><topic>Wildlife management</topic><topic>Winter</topic><topic>Yearlings</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>PAC, DAVID F</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>WHITE, GARY C</creatorcontrib><collection>AGRIS</collection><collection>Istex</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Sustainability Science Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Biology Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Agricultural &amp; Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric &amp; Aquatic Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Research Library China</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric &amp; Aquatic Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>University of Michigan</collection><jtitle>The Journal of wildlife management</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>PAC, DAVID F</au><au>WHITE, GARY C</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Survival and Cause-Specific Mortality of Male Mule Deer Under Different Hunting Regulations in the Bridger Mountains, Montana</atitle><jtitle>The Journal of wildlife management</jtitle><date>2007-05</date><risdate>2007</risdate><volume>71</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>816</spage><epage>827</epage><pages>816-827</pages><issn>0022-541X</issn><eissn>1937-2817</eissn><coden>JWMAA9</coden><abstract>We selected 2 adjacent populations of mule deer (Odocoileus hemionus hemionus) in the Bridger Mountains, Montana, USA, to measure effects on survival rates and causes of mortality of 2 hunting regulations designed to enhance representation of mature males. We compared male survival between the West Slope and South 16 Mile populations considering both hunting and nonhunting sources of mortality with respect to age (fawn, yearling, and mature), month (Jun–May), and year (1990–1995). Harvest rates of mature males were greater than for yearlings, demonstrating hunter preferences. We found no differences in yearling monthly survival rates between October and November or between areas or years. In contrast, we found survival of mature males differed between October and November and across years and study areas. During these months, survival rates of mature males averaged 0.602 on the West Slope under the 2-point regulation and 0.762 on South 16 Mile under the outfitted hunt. Monthly survival during summer also differed by age class, but not area, with estimates of 0.963 for yearling males, and corresponding mature male survival estimates of 0.991, demonstrating greater yearling summer mortality. Winter survival rates of yearlings and matures were similar for both areas with a monthly estimate of 0.986. We found differences in spring monthly survival estimates for the 2 areas, mainly for matures. Yearling male monthly survival estimates were 0.959 and 0.958 for the 2 areas, whereas corresponding mature male estimates during spring were 0.991 and 0.936 on the West Slope and South 16 Mile, respectively. Fawn survival rates varied from 0.101 to 0.770 among years and between areas overwinter. Cumulative effects of nonhunting mortality among all age classes reduced the effectiveness of 2 hunting regulations designed to enhance survival of males to age classes ≥4 years associated with maximum antler development despite accomplishing reductions in harvest rates. Low and variable fawn survival and relatively high nonhunting-related losses of yearling and mature males might be typical of many populations in the Northern Rocky Mountains. Deer managers should avoid populations coexisting with a diversity of large predators in environments with strong year effects when considering opportunities for implementing harvest regulations to improve representation of mature males.</abstract><cop>Oxford, UK</cop><pub>The Wildlife Society</pub><doi>10.2193/2005-713</doi><tpages>12</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0022-541X
ispartof The Journal of wildlife management, 2007-05, Vol.71 (3), p.816-827
issn 0022-541X
1937-2817
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_20381653
source Wiley Journals; JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing
subjects adult animals
Animal behavior
Data analysis
Deer
Deer hunting
Fawns
Federal funding
Females
fish and wildlife law
forests
game animals
harvest
hunting regulations
male mule deer
Males
Montana
Mortality
Mountains
Mule deer
nonhunting mortality
Odocoileus hemionus
Odocoileus hemionus hemionus
population
population dynamics
predation
Predators
Program MARK
Public lands
radio frequency identification
radiocollars
Regulation
Research s
seasonal variation
Sloping terrain
sport hunting
Spring
Summer
Survival
Survival rates
wild animals
wildlife habitats
Wildlife management
Winter
Yearlings
title Survival and Cause-Specific Mortality of Male Mule Deer Under Different Hunting Regulations in the Bridger Mountains, Montana
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-05T00%3A05%3A02IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Survival%20and%20Cause-Specific%20Mortality%20of%20Male%20Mule%20Deer%20Under%20Different%20Hunting%20Regulations%20in%20the%20Bridger%20Mountains,%20Montana&rft.jtitle=The%20Journal%20of%20wildlife%20management&rft.au=PAC,%20DAVID%20F&rft.date=2007-05&rft.volume=71&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=816&rft.epage=827&rft.pages=816-827&rft.issn=0022-541X&rft.eissn=1937-2817&rft.coden=JWMAA9&rft_id=info:doi/10.2193/2005-713&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E4495258%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=234214249&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=4495258&rfr_iscdi=true