Evaporation and canopy conductance of citrus orchards

Evaporation of citrus orchards has been widely studied, but differences in methodologies and management conditions have led to conflicting results, mainly due to differences in ground cover and soil evaporation. In this work the contribution of transpiration and soil evaporation has been studied in...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Agricultural water management 2009-04, Vol.96 (4), p.565-573
Hauptverfasser: Villalobos, F.J., Testi, L., Moreno-Perez, M.F.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Evaporation of citrus orchards has been widely studied, but differences in methodologies and management conditions have led to conflicting results, mainly due to differences in ground cover and soil evaporation. In this work the contribution of transpiration and soil evaporation has been studied in a drip-irrigated, clean cultivated mandarin ( Citrus reticulata Blanco) orchard on a sandy soil in Southern Spain. Evapotranspiration (ET) was measured using eddy covariance while soil evaporation was determined with microlysimeters, during August 2000 and May 2001. Average ET was 2.6 mm day −1 in August and 2.1 mm day −1 in May. The crop coefficient ( K c) was 0.44 and 0.43 in 2000 and 2001, respectively. The coefficient of transpiration ( K p) was 0.30 in 2000 and 0.25 in 2001. The daily bulk canopy conductance ( g c) ranged from 1.2 to 2.2 (average 1.8) mm s −1 in 2000 and from 1.2 to 2.7 (average 1.9) mm s −1 in 2001. A model of daily canopy conductance as a function of intercepted radiation was derived and applied to calculate the transpiration of orchards with different values of ground cover (GC). The ratio of transpiration over reference ET of mandarin orchards is linearly related to ground cover ( K p = 0.7 GC). Calculated crop coefficients agree with values suggested by FAO for mature orchards (around 0.65) but are substantially lower than FAO values for young plantations.
ISSN:0378-3774
1873-2283
DOI:10.1016/j.agwat.2008.09.016