Regional assessment of plant invasions across different habitat types

Questions: 1. Which habitats have the highest degree of invasion? 2. Do native species-rich communities have also a high degree of invasion? 3. Do the patterns of association between native and alien species richness vary between habitats. Location: Catalonia region (NE Spain). Methods: We conducted...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of vegetation science 2007-02, Vol.18 (1), p.35-42
Hauptverfasser: Montserrat, Vilà, Joan, Pino, Xavier, Font
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 42
container_issue 1
container_start_page 35
container_title Journal of vegetation science
container_volume 18
creator Montserrat, Vilà
Joan, Pino
Xavier, Font
description Questions: 1. Which habitats have the highest degree of invasion? 2. Do native species-rich communities have also a high degree of invasion? 3. Do the patterns of association between native and alien species richness vary between habitats. Location: Catalonia region (NE Spain). Methods: We conducted a large regional analysis of 15 655 phytosociological relevés to detect differences in the degree of invasion between European Nature Information System (EUNIS) habitats representative of temperate and Mediterranean European areas. Results: Alien species were present in less than 17 % of the relevés and represented less than 2% of the total number of species per habitat. The EUNIS habitats with the highest alien species richness were arable land and gardens followed by anthropogenic forb-rich habitats, riverine and lakeshore scrubs, southern riparian galleries and thickets and trampled areas. In contrast, the following habitats had never any alien species: surface running waters, raised and blanket bogs, valley mires, poor fens and transition mires, base-rich fens, alpine and sub-alpine grasslands, sub-alpine moist or wet tall-herb and fern habitats, alpine and sub-alpine scrub habitats and spiny Mediterranean heaths. There was a unimodal relationship between the mean native and mean alien species richness per EUNIS habitat with a high number of aliens in habitats with intermediate number of native species and a low number of aliens at both extremes of the native species gradient. Within EUNIS habitats, the relationship was positive, negative or non-significant depending on the habitat type without any clear pattern related to the number of native species. Alien species richness was not related to plot size, neither between habitats nor within habitats. Conclusions: The analysis emphasised that the habitats with a higher degree of invasion were the most disturbed ones and that in general habitats rich in native species did not harbour less invaders than habitats poor in native species.
doi_str_mv 10.1658/1100-9233(2007)18[35:RAOPIA]2.0.CO;2
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>gale_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_20376841</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A165939651</galeid><jstor_id>4499196</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>A165939651</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-b4622-187b7fe7a07f3919139a0926210c61b9a325e61733c9c777299dbcb2add2a62e3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqdkdFrFDEQxhdRaK3-BwUXBLHQPZPJbrLRp-u1aqFwUu2TyDC7m5wpe5sz2Rb63zfbVUHwqeQhw8xvPobvy7JjzhZcVvU7zhkrNAjxFhhTR7z-Lqr3l8v1l_PlD1iwxWr9AZ5k-4kti8SKp6n-s7KXPY_xmjGutOT72dml2Tg_UJ9TjCbGrRnG3Nt811Mq3HBLMY1jTm3wMeads9aEiflJjRtpzMe7nYkvsmeW-mhe_v4PsquPZ99Wn4uL9afz1fKiaEoJUPBaNcoaRUxZobnmQhPTIIGzVvJGk4DKSK6EaHWrlAKtu6ZtgLoOSIIRB9mbWXcX_K8bE0fcutiaPh1r_E1EYELJuuQJfD2DG-oNusH6MVA7wbhMtmihZTVRi_9Q6XVm61o_GOtS_5-F03nhwY1gLO6C21K4Q85wigYnn3HyGadokNcoKpyjQUCGqzVCkjmcZa7j6MNfjbLUyRSZxq_msSWPtAku4tVXYFwkxRoqoRJxMhON8-nMx11xD5LlqUk</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>20376841</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Regional assessment of plant invasions across different habitat types</title><source>JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing</source><source>Wiley Online Library All Journals</source><creator>Montserrat, Vilà ; Joan, Pino ; Xavier, Font</creator><contributor>Bruelheide, H</contributor><creatorcontrib>Montserrat, Vilà ; Joan, Pino ; Xavier, Font ; Bruelheide, H</creatorcontrib><description>Questions: 1. Which habitats have the highest degree of invasion? 2. Do native species-rich communities have also a high degree of invasion? 3. Do the patterns of association between native and alien species richness vary between habitats. Location: Catalonia region (NE Spain). Methods: We conducted a large regional analysis of 15 655 phytosociological relevés to detect differences in the degree of invasion between European Nature Information System (EUNIS) habitats representative of temperate and Mediterranean European areas. Results: Alien species were present in less than 17 % of the relevés and represented less than 2% of the total number of species per habitat. The EUNIS habitats with the highest alien species richness were arable land and gardens followed by anthropogenic forb-rich habitats, riverine and lakeshore scrubs, southern riparian galleries and thickets and trampled areas. In contrast, the following habitats had never any alien species: surface running waters, raised and blanket bogs, valley mires, poor fens and transition mires, base-rich fens, alpine and sub-alpine grasslands, sub-alpine moist or wet tall-herb and fern habitats, alpine and sub-alpine scrub habitats and spiny Mediterranean heaths. There was a unimodal relationship between the mean native and mean alien species richness per EUNIS habitat with a high number of aliens in habitats with intermediate number of native species and a low number of aliens at both extremes of the native species gradient. Within EUNIS habitats, the relationship was positive, negative or non-significant depending on the habitat type without any clear pattern related to the number of native species. Alien species richness was not related to plot size, neither between habitats nor within habitats. Conclusions: The analysis emphasised that the habitats with a higher degree of invasion were the most disturbed ones and that in general habitats rich in native species did not harbour less invaders than habitats poor in native species.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1100-9233</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1654-1103</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1104-7402</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1658/1100-9233(2007)18[35:RAOPIA]2.0.CO;2</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Opulus Press Uppsala</publisher><subject>Alien plant ; Analysis ; Aquatic habitats ; Biological invasions ; Ecological invasion ; Environmental aspects ; EUNIS ; Habitat conservation ; Habitats ; indigenous species ; Influence ; Introduced species ; Invasive species ; Mediterranean climate ; Mediterranean community ; Native species ; Plant introduction ; Plant invasions ; Plants ; Relevé ; Riverine habitats ; s ; species diversity ; Species richness ; temperate zones ; Vegetation dynamics ; Vegetation type ; vegetation types</subject><ispartof>Journal of vegetation science, 2007-02, Vol.18 (1), p.35-42</ispartof><rights>2007 Opulus Press Uppsala.</rights><rights>Copyright 2006 IAVS; Opulus Press Uppsala</rights><rights>COPYRIGHT 2007 Opulus Press AB</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-b4622-187b7fe7a07f3919139a0926210c61b9a325e61733c9c777299dbcb2add2a62e3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-b4622-187b7fe7a07f3919139a0926210c61b9a325e61733c9c777299dbcb2add2a62e3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/4499196$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/4499196$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,799,27901,27902,57992,58225</link.rule.ids></links><search><contributor>Bruelheide, H</contributor><creatorcontrib>Montserrat, Vilà</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Joan, Pino</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Xavier, Font</creatorcontrib><title>Regional assessment of plant invasions across different habitat types</title><title>Journal of vegetation science</title><description>Questions: 1. Which habitats have the highest degree of invasion? 2. Do native species-rich communities have also a high degree of invasion? 3. Do the patterns of association between native and alien species richness vary between habitats. Location: Catalonia region (NE Spain). Methods: We conducted a large regional analysis of 15 655 phytosociological relevés to detect differences in the degree of invasion between European Nature Information System (EUNIS) habitats representative of temperate and Mediterranean European areas. Results: Alien species were present in less than 17 % of the relevés and represented less than 2% of the total number of species per habitat. The EUNIS habitats with the highest alien species richness were arable land and gardens followed by anthropogenic forb-rich habitats, riverine and lakeshore scrubs, southern riparian galleries and thickets and trampled areas. In contrast, the following habitats had never any alien species: surface running waters, raised and blanket bogs, valley mires, poor fens and transition mires, base-rich fens, alpine and sub-alpine grasslands, sub-alpine moist or wet tall-herb and fern habitats, alpine and sub-alpine scrub habitats and spiny Mediterranean heaths. There was a unimodal relationship between the mean native and mean alien species richness per EUNIS habitat with a high number of aliens in habitats with intermediate number of native species and a low number of aliens at both extremes of the native species gradient. Within EUNIS habitats, the relationship was positive, negative or non-significant depending on the habitat type without any clear pattern related to the number of native species. Alien species richness was not related to plot size, neither between habitats nor within habitats. Conclusions: The analysis emphasised that the habitats with a higher degree of invasion were the most disturbed ones and that in general habitats rich in native species did not harbour less invaders than habitats poor in native species.</description><subject>Alien plant</subject><subject>Analysis</subject><subject>Aquatic habitats</subject><subject>Biological invasions</subject><subject>Ecological invasion</subject><subject>Environmental aspects</subject><subject>EUNIS</subject><subject>Habitat conservation</subject><subject>Habitats</subject><subject>indigenous species</subject><subject>Influence</subject><subject>Introduced species</subject><subject>Invasive species</subject><subject>Mediterranean climate</subject><subject>Mediterranean community</subject><subject>Native species</subject><subject>Plant introduction</subject><subject>Plant invasions</subject><subject>Plants</subject><subject>Relevé</subject><subject>Riverine habitats</subject><subject>s</subject><subject>species diversity</subject><subject>Species richness</subject><subject>temperate zones</subject><subject>Vegetation dynamics</subject><subject>Vegetation type</subject><subject>vegetation types</subject><issn>1100-9233</issn><issn>1654-1103</issn><issn>1104-7402</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2007</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqdkdFrFDEQxhdRaK3-BwUXBLHQPZPJbrLRp-u1aqFwUu2TyDC7m5wpe5sz2Rb63zfbVUHwqeQhw8xvPobvy7JjzhZcVvU7zhkrNAjxFhhTR7z-Lqr3l8v1l_PlD1iwxWr9AZ5k-4kti8SKp6n-s7KXPY_xmjGutOT72dml2Tg_UJ9TjCbGrRnG3Nt811Mq3HBLMY1jTm3wMeads9aEiflJjRtpzMe7nYkvsmeW-mhe_v4PsquPZ99Wn4uL9afz1fKiaEoJUPBaNcoaRUxZobnmQhPTIIGzVvJGk4DKSK6EaHWrlAKtu6ZtgLoOSIIRB9mbWXcX_K8bE0fcutiaPh1r_E1EYELJuuQJfD2DG-oNusH6MVA7wbhMtmihZTVRi_9Q6XVm61o_GOtS_5-F03nhwY1gLO6C21K4Q85wigYnn3HyGadokNcoKpyjQUCGqzVCkjmcZa7j6MNfjbLUyRSZxq_msSWPtAku4tVXYFwkxRoqoRJxMhON8-nMx11xD5LlqUk</recordid><startdate>200702</startdate><enddate>200702</enddate><creator>Montserrat, Vilà</creator><creator>Joan, Pino</creator><creator>Xavier, Font</creator><general>Opulus Press Uppsala</general><general>Opulus Press</general><general>Opulus Press AB</general><scope>FBQ</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>C1K</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200702</creationdate><title>Regional assessment of plant invasions across different habitat types</title><author>Montserrat, Vilà ; Joan, Pino ; Xavier, Font</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-b4622-187b7fe7a07f3919139a0926210c61b9a325e61733c9c777299dbcb2add2a62e3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2007</creationdate><topic>Alien plant</topic><topic>Analysis</topic><topic>Aquatic habitats</topic><topic>Biological invasions</topic><topic>Ecological invasion</topic><topic>Environmental aspects</topic><topic>EUNIS</topic><topic>Habitat conservation</topic><topic>Habitats</topic><topic>indigenous species</topic><topic>Influence</topic><topic>Introduced species</topic><topic>Invasive species</topic><topic>Mediterranean climate</topic><topic>Mediterranean community</topic><topic>Native species</topic><topic>Plant introduction</topic><topic>Plant invasions</topic><topic>Plants</topic><topic>Relevé</topic><topic>Riverine habitats</topic><topic>s</topic><topic>species diversity</topic><topic>Species richness</topic><topic>temperate zones</topic><topic>Vegetation dynamics</topic><topic>Vegetation type</topic><topic>vegetation types</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Montserrat, Vilà</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Joan, Pino</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Xavier, Font</creatorcontrib><collection>AGRIS</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><jtitle>Journal of vegetation science</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Montserrat, Vilà</au><au>Joan, Pino</au><au>Xavier, Font</au><au>Bruelheide, H</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Regional assessment of plant invasions across different habitat types</atitle><jtitle>Journal of vegetation science</jtitle><date>2007-02</date><risdate>2007</risdate><volume>18</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>35</spage><epage>42</epage><pages>35-42</pages><issn>1100-9233</issn><eissn>1654-1103</eissn><eissn>1104-7402</eissn><abstract>Questions: 1. Which habitats have the highest degree of invasion? 2. Do native species-rich communities have also a high degree of invasion? 3. Do the patterns of association between native and alien species richness vary between habitats. Location: Catalonia region (NE Spain). Methods: We conducted a large regional analysis of 15 655 phytosociological relevés to detect differences in the degree of invasion between European Nature Information System (EUNIS) habitats representative of temperate and Mediterranean European areas. Results: Alien species were present in less than 17 % of the relevés and represented less than 2% of the total number of species per habitat. The EUNIS habitats with the highest alien species richness were arable land and gardens followed by anthropogenic forb-rich habitats, riverine and lakeshore scrubs, southern riparian galleries and thickets and trampled areas. In contrast, the following habitats had never any alien species: surface running waters, raised and blanket bogs, valley mires, poor fens and transition mires, base-rich fens, alpine and sub-alpine grasslands, sub-alpine moist or wet tall-herb and fern habitats, alpine and sub-alpine scrub habitats and spiny Mediterranean heaths. There was a unimodal relationship between the mean native and mean alien species richness per EUNIS habitat with a high number of aliens in habitats with intermediate number of native species and a low number of aliens at both extremes of the native species gradient. Within EUNIS habitats, the relationship was positive, negative or non-significant depending on the habitat type without any clear pattern related to the number of native species. Alien species richness was not related to plot size, neither between habitats nor within habitats. Conclusions: The analysis emphasised that the habitats with a higher degree of invasion were the most disturbed ones and that in general habitats rich in native species did not harbour less invaders than habitats poor in native species.</abstract><pub>Opulus Press Uppsala</pub><doi>10.1658/1100-9233(2007)18[35:RAOPIA]2.0.CO;2</doi><tpages>8</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1100-9233
ispartof Journal of vegetation science, 2007-02, Vol.18 (1), p.35-42
issn 1100-9233
1654-1103
1104-7402
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_20376841
source JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing; Wiley Online Library All Journals
subjects Alien plant
Analysis
Aquatic habitats
Biological invasions
Ecological invasion
Environmental aspects
EUNIS
Habitat conservation
Habitats
indigenous species
Influence
Introduced species
Invasive species
Mediterranean climate
Mediterranean community
Native species
Plant introduction
Plant invasions
Plants
Relevé
Riverine habitats
s
species diversity
Species richness
temperate zones
Vegetation dynamics
Vegetation type
vegetation types
title Regional assessment of plant invasions across different habitat types
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-20T17%3A10%3A27IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Regional%20assessment%20of%20plant%20invasions%20across%20different%20habitat%20types&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20vegetation%20science&rft.au=Montserrat,%20Vil%C3%A0&rft.date=2007-02&rft.volume=18&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=35&rft.epage=42&rft.pages=35-42&rft.issn=1100-9233&rft.eissn=1654-1103&rft_id=info:doi/10.1658/1100-9233(2007)18%5B35:RAOPIA%5D2.0.CO;2&rft_dat=%3Cgale_proqu%3EA165939651%3C/gale_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=20376841&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_galeid=A165939651&rft_jstor_id=4499196&rfr_iscdi=true