Regional assessment of plant invasions across different habitat types
Questions: 1. Which habitats have the highest degree of invasion? 2. Do native species-rich communities have also a high degree of invasion? 3. Do the patterns of association between native and alien species richness vary between habitats. Location: Catalonia region (NE Spain). Methods: We conducted...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of vegetation science 2007-02, Vol.18 (1), p.35-42 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 42 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 35 |
container_title | Journal of vegetation science |
container_volume | 18 |
creator | Montserrat, Vilà Joan, Pino Xavier, Font |
description | Questions: 1. Which habitats have the highest degree of invasion? 2. Do native species-rich communities have also a high degree of invasion? 3. Do the patterns of association between native and alien species richness vary between habitats. Location: Catalonia region (NE Spain). Methods: We conducted a large regional analysis of 15 655 phytosociological relevés to detect differences in the degree of invasion between European Nature Information System (EUNIS) habitats representative of temperate and Mediterranean European areas. Results: Alien species were present in less than 17 % of the relevés and represented less than 2% of the total number of species per habitat. The EUNIS habitats with the highest alien species richness were arable land and gardens followed by anthropogenic forb-rich habitats, riverine and lakeshore scrubs, southern riparian galleries and thickets and trampled areas. In contrast, the following habitats had never any alien species: surface running waters, raised and blanket bogs, valley mires, poor fens and transition mires, base-rich fens, alpine and sub-alpine grasslands, sub-alpine moist or wet tall-herb and fern habitats, alpine and sub-alpine scrub habitats and spiny Mediterranean heaths. There was a unimodal relationship between the mean native and mean alien species richness per EUNIS habitat with a high number of aliens in habitats with intermediate number of native species and a low number of aliens at both extremes of the native species gradient. Within EUNIS habitats, the relationship was positive, negative or non-significant depending on the habitat type without any clear pattern related to the number of native species. Alien species richness was not related to plot size, neither between habitats nor within habitats. Conclusions: The analysis emphasised that the habitats with a higher degree of invasion were the most disturbed ones and that in general habitats rich in native species did not harbour less invaders than habitats poor in native species. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1658/1100-9233(2007)18[35:RAOPIA]2.0.CO;2 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_20376841</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A165939651</galeid><jstor_id>4499196</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>A165939651</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-b4622-187b7fe7a07f3919139a0926210c61b9a325e61733c9c777299dbcb2add2a62e3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqdkdFrFDEQxhdRaK3-BwUXBLHQPZPJbrLRp-u1aqFwUu2TyDC7m5wpe5sz2Rb63zfbVUHwqeQhw8xvPobvy7JjzhZcVvU7zhkrNAjxFhhTR7z-Lqr3l8v1l_PlD1iwxWr9AZ5k-4kti8SKp6n-s7KXPY_xmjGutOT72dml2Tg_UJ9TjCbGrRnG3Nt811Mq3HBLMY1jTm3wMeads9aEiflJjRtpzMe7nYkvsmeW-mhe_v4PsquPZ99Wn4uL9afz1fKiaEoJUPBaNcoaRUxZobnmQhPTIIGzVvJGk4DKSK6EaHWrlAKtu6ZtgLoOSIIRB9mbWXcX_K8bE0fcutiaPh1r_E1EYELJuuQJfD2DG-oNusH6MVA7wbhMtmihZTVRi_9Q6XVm61o_GOtS_5-F03nhwY1gLO6C21K4Q85wigYnn3HyGadokNcoKpyjQUCGqzVCkjmcZa7j6MNfjbLUyRSZxq_msSWPtAku4tVXYFwkxRoqoRJxMhON8-nMx11xD5LlqUk</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>20376841</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Regional assessment of plant invasions across different habitat types</title><source>JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing</source><source>Wiley Online Library All Journals</source><creator>Montserrat, Vilà ; Joan, Pino ; Xavier, Font</creator><contributor>Bruelheide, H</contributor><creatorcontrib>Montserrat, Vilà ; Joan, Pino ; Xavier, Font ; Bruelheide, H</creatorcontrib><description>Questions: 1. Which habitats have the highest degree of invasion? 2. Do native species-rich communities have also a high degree of invasion? 3. Do the patterns of association between native and alien species richness vary between habitats. Location: Catalonia region (NE Spain). Methods: We conducted a large regional analysis of 15 655 phytosociological relevés to detect differences in the degree of invasion between European Nature Information System (EUNIS) habitats representative of temperate and Mediterranean European areas. Results: Alien species were present in less than 17 % of the relevés and represented less than 2% of the total number of species per habitat. The EUNIS habitats with the highest alien species richness were arable land and gardens followed by anthropogenic forb-rich habitats, riverine and lakeshore scrubs, southern riparian galleries and thickets and trampled areas. In contrast, the following habitats had never any alien species: surface running waters, raised and blanket bogs, valley mires, poor fens and transition mires, base-rich fens, alpine and sub-alpine grasslands, sub-alpine moist or wet tall-herb and fern habitats, alpine and sub-alpine scrub habitats and spiny Mediterranean heaths. There was a unimodal relationship between the mean native and mean alien species richness per EUNIS habitat with a high number of aliens in habitats with intermediate number of native species and a low number of aliens at both extremes of the native species gradient. Within EUNIS habitats, the relationship was positive, negative or non-significant depending on the habitat type without any clear pattern related to the number of native species. Alien species richness was not related to plot size, neither between habitats nor within habitats. Conclusions: The analysis emphasised that the habitats with a higher degree of invasion were the most disturbed ones and that in general habitats rich in native species did not harbour less invaders than habitats poor in native species.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1100-9233</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1654-1103</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1104-7402</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1658/1100-9233(2007)18[35:RAOPIA]2.0.CO;2</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Opulus Press Uppsala</publisher><subject>Alien plant ; Analysis ; Aquatic habitats ; Biological invasions ; Ecological invasion ; Environmental aspects ; EUNIS ; Habitat conservation ; Habitats ; indigenous species ; Influence ; Introduced species ; Invasive species ; Mediterranean climate ; Mediterranean community ; Native species ; Plant introduction ; Plant invasions ; Plants ; Relevé ; Riverine habitats ; s ; species diversity ; Species richness ; temperate zones ; Vegetation dynamics ; Vegetation type ; vegetation types</subject><ispartof>Journal of vegetation science, 2007-02, Vol.18 (1), p.35-42</ispartof><rights>2007 Opulus Press Uppsala.</rights><rights>Copyright 2006 IAVS; Opulus Press Uppsala</rights><rights>COPYRIGHT 2007 Opulus Press AB</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-b4622-187b7fe7a07f3919139a0926210c61b9a325e61733c9c777299dbcb2add2a62e3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-b4622-187b7fe7a07f3919139a0926210c61b9a325e61733c9c777299dbcb2add2a62e3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/4499196$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/4499196$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,799,27901,27902,57992,58225</link.rule.ids></links><search><contributor>Bruelheide, H</contributor><creatorcontrib>Montserrat, Vilà</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Joan, Pino</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Xavier, Font</creatorcontrib><title>Regional assessment of plant invasions across different habitat types</title><title>Journal of vegetation science</title><description>Questions: 1. Which habitats have the highest degree of invasion? 2. Do native species-rich communities have also a high degree of invasion? 3. Do the patterns of association between native and alien species richness vary between habitats. Location: Catalonia region (NE Spain). Methods: We conducted a large regional analysis of 15 655 phytosociological relevés to detect differences in the degree of invasion between European Nature Information System (EUNIS) habitats representative of temperate and Mediterranean European areas. Results: Alien species were present in less than 17 % of the relevés and represented less than 2% of the total number of species per habitat. The EUNIS habitats with the highest alien species richness were arable land and gardens followed by anthropogenic forb-rich habitats, riverine and lakeshore scrubs, southern riparian galleries and thickets and trampled areas. In contrast, the following habitats had never any alien species: surface running waters, raised and blanket bogs, valley mires, poor fens and transition mires, base-rich fens, alpine and sub-alpine grasslands, sub-alpine moist or wet tall-herb and fern habitats, alpine and sub-alpine scrub habitats and spiny Mediterranean heaths. There was a unimodal relationship between the mean native and mean alien species richness per EUNIS habitat with a high number of aliens in habitats with intermediate number of native species and a low number of aliens at both extremes of the native species gradient. Within EUNIS habitats, the relationship was positive, negative or non-significant depending on the habitat type without any clear pattern related to the number of native species. Alien species richness was not related to plot size, neither between habitats nor within habitats. Conclusions: The analysis emphasised that the habitats with a higher degree of invasion were the most disturbed ones and that in general habitats rich in native species did not harbour less invaders than habitats poor in native species.</description><subject>Alien plant</subject><subject>Analysis</subject><subject>Aquatic habitats</subject><subject>Biological invasions</subject><subject>Ecological invasion</subject><subject>Environmental aspects</subject><subject>EUNIS</subject><subject>Habitat conservation</subject><subject>Habitats</subject><subject>indigenous species</subject><subject>Influence</subject><subject>Introduced species</subject><subject>Invasive species</subject><subject>Mediterranean climate</subject><subject>Mediterranean community</subject><subject>Native species</subject><subject>Plant introduction</subject><subject>Plant invasions</subject><subject>Plants</subject><subject>Relevé</subject><subject>Riverine habitats</subject><subject>s</subject><subject>species diversity</subject><subject>Species richness</subject><subject>temperate zones</subject><subject>Vegetation dynamics</subject><subject>Vegetation type</subject><subject>vegetation types</subject><issn>1100-9233</issn><issn>1654-1103</issn><issn>1104-7402</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2007</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqdkdFrFDEQxhdRaK3-BwUXBLHQPZPJbrLRp-u1aqFwUu2TyDC7m5wpe5sz2Rb63zfbVUHwqeQhw8xvPobvy7JjzhZcVvU7zhkrNAjxFhhTR7z-Lqr3l8v1l_PlD1iwxWr9AZ5k-4kti8SKp6n-s7KXPY_xmjGutOT72dml2Tg_UJ9TjCbGrRnG3Nt811Mq3HBLMY1jTm3wMeads9aEiflJjRtpzMe7nYkvsmeW-mhe_v4PsquPZ99Wn4uL9afz1fKiaEoJUPBaNcoaRUxZobnmQhPTIIGzVvJGk4DKSK6EaHWrlAKtu6ZtgLoOSIIRB9mbWXcX_K8bE0fcutiaPh1r_E1EYELJuuQJfD2DG-oNusH6MVA7wbhMtmihZTVRi_9Q6XVm61o_GOtS_5-F03nhwY1gLO6C21K4Q85wigYnn3HyGadokNcoKpyjQUCGqzVCkjmcZa7j6MNfjbLUyRSZxq_msSWPtAku4tVXYFwkxRoqoRJxMhON8-nMx11xD5LlqUk</recordid><startdate>200702</startdate><enddate>200702</enddate><creator>Montserrat, Vilà</creator><creator>Joan, Pino</creator><creator>Xavier, Font</creator><general>Opulus Press Uppsala</general><general>Opulus Press</general><general>Opulus Press AB</general><scope>FBQ</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>C1K</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200702</creationdate><title>Regional assessment of plant invasions across different habitat types</title><author>Montserrat, Vilà ; Joan, Pino ; Xavier, Font</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-b4622-187b7fe7a07f3919139a0926210c61b9a325e61733c9c777299dbcb2add2a62e3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2007</creationdate><topic>Alien plant</topic><topic>Analysis</topic><topic>Aquatic habitats</topic><topic>Biological invasions</topic><topic>Ecological invasion</topic><topic>Environmental aspects</topic><topic>EUNIS</topic><topic>Habitat conservation</topic><topic>Habitats</topic><topic>indigenous species</topic><topic>Influence</topic><topic>Introduced species</topic><topic>Invasive species</topic><topic>Mediterranean climate</topic><topic>Mediterranean community</topic><topic>Native species</topic><topic>Plant introduction</topic><topic>Plant invasions</topic><topic>Plants</topic><topic>Relevé</topic><topic>Riverine habitats</topic><topic>s</topic><topic>species diversity</topic><topic>Species richness</topic><topic>temperate zones</topic><topic>Vegetation dynamics</topic><topic>Vegetation type</topic><topic>vegetation types</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Montserrat, Vilà</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Joan, Pino</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Xavier, Font</creatorcontrib><collection>AGRIS</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><jtitle>Journal of vegetation science</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Montserrat, Vilà</au><au>Joan, Pino</au><au>Xavier, Font</au><au>Bruelheide, H</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Regional assessment of plant invasions across different habitat types</atitle><jtitle>Journal of vegetation science</jtitle><date>2007-02</date><risdate>2007</risdate><volume>18</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>35</spage><epage>42</epage><pages>35-42</pages><issn>1100-9233</issn><eissn>1654-1103</eissn><eissn>1104-7402</eissn><abstract>Questions: 1. Which habitats have the highest degree of invasion? 2. Do native species-rich communities have also a high degree of invasion? 3. Do the patterns of association between native and alien species richness vary between habitats. Location: Catalonia region (NE Spain). Methods: We conducted a large regional analysis of 15 655 phytosociological relevés to detect differences in the degree of invasion between European Nature Information System (EUNIS) habitats representative of temperate and Mediterranean European areas. Results: Alien species were present in less than 17 % of the relevés and represented less than 2% of the total number of species per habitat. The EUNIS habitats with the highest alien species richness were arable land and gardens followed by anthropogenic forb-rich habitats, riverine and lakeshore scrubs, southern riparian galleries and thickets and trampled areas. In contrast, the following habitats had never any alien species: surface running waters, raised and blanket bogs, valley mires, poor fens and transition mires, base-rich fens, alpine and sub-alpine grasslands, sub-alpine moist or wet tall-herb and fern habitats, alpine and sub-alpine scrub habitats and spiny Mediterranean heaths. There was a unimodal relationship between the mean native and mean alien species richness per EUNIS habitat with a high number of aliens in habitats with intermediate number of native species and a low number of aliens at both extremes of the native species gradient. Within EUNIS habitats, the relationship was positive, negative or non-significant depending on the habitat type without any clear pattern related to the number of native species. Alien species richness was not related to plot size, neither between habitats nor within habitats. Conclusions: The analysis emphasised that the habitats with a higher degree of invasion were the most disturbed ones and that in general habitats rich in native species did not harbour less invaders than habitats poor in native species.</abstract><pub>Opulus Press Uppsala</pub><doi>10.1658/1100-9233(2007)18[35:RAOPIA]2.0.CO;2</doi><tpages>8</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1100-9233 |
ispartof | Journal of vegetation science, 2007-02, Vol.18 (1), p.35-42 |
issn | 1100-9233 1654-1103 1104-7402 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_20376841 |
source | JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing; Wiley Online Library All Journals |
subjects | Alien plant Analysis Aquatic habitats Biological invasions Ecological invasion Environmental aspects EUNIS Habitat conservation Habitats indigenous species Influence Introduced species Invasive species Mediterranean climate Mediterranean community Native species Plant introduction Plant invasions Plants Relevé Riverine habitats s species diversity Species richness temperate zones Vegetation dynamics Vegetation type vegetation types |
title | Regional assessment of plant invasions across different habitat types |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-20T17%3A10%3A27IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Regional%20assessment%20of%20plant%20invasions%20across%20different%20habitat%20types&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20vegetation%20science&rft.au=Montserrat,%20Vil%C3%A0&rft.date=2007-02&rft.volume=18&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=35&rft.epage=42&rft.pages=35-42&rft.issn=1100-9233&rft.eissn=1654-1103&rft_id=info:doi/10.1658/1100-9233(2007)18%5B35:RAOPIA%5D2.0.CO;2&rft_dat=%3Cgale_proqu%3EA165939651%3C/gale_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=20376841&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_galeid=A165939651&rft_jstor_id=4499196&rfr_iscdi=true |