Adverse events and satisfaction with use of intranasal midazolam for emergency department procedures in children

Procedural sedation is commonly performed in the emergency department (ED). Having safe and fast means of providing sedation and anxiolysis to children is important for the child's tolerance of the procedure, parent satisfaction and efficient patient flow in the ED. To evaluate fasting times as...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The American journal of emergency medicine 2019-01, Vol.37 (1), p.85-88
Hauptverfasser: Malia, Laurie, Laurich, V. Matt, Sturm, Jesse J.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 88
container_issue 1
container_start_page 85
container_title The American journal of emergency medicine
container_volume 37
creator Malia, Laurie
Laurich, V. Matt
Sturm, Jesse J.
description Procedural sedation is commonly performed in the emergency department (ED). Having safe and fast means of providing sedation and anxiolysis to children is important for the child's tolerance of the procedure, parent satisfaction and efficient patient flow in the ED. To evaluate fasting times associated with the administration of intranasal midazolam (INM) and associated complications. Secondary objectives included assessing provider and caregiver satisfaction scores. A prospective observational study was conducted in children presenting to an urban pediatric emergency department who received INM for anxiolysis for a procedure or imaging. Data collected included last solid and liquid intake, procedure performed, sedation depth, adverse events and parent and provider satisfaction. 112 patients were enrolled. The mean age was 3.8 years. There were no adverse events experienced by any patients. Laceration repair was the most common reason for INM use. The median depth of sedation was 2.0 (cooperative/tranquil). The median liquid NPO time was 172.5 min and the median NPO time for solids was 194.0 min. 29.8% were NPO for liquids ≤2 h and 62.5% were NPO for solids ≤2 h. Parent and provider satisfaction was high: 90.4% of parents' and 88.4% of providers' satisfaction scores were a 4 or 5 on a 5 point Likert scale. Our data suggest that short NPO of both solids and liquids are safe for the use of INM. Additionally, parent and provider satisfaction scores were high with the use of INM.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.ajem.2018.04.063
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2035707543</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0735675718303589</els_id><sourcerecordid>2035707543</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c428t-9cdbe7f8662e6619c6972179c64636f89b3b817c8f6459918658642b10c1de303</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kU1v1DAQhi0EokvhD3BAlrj0ktTfdiQuVUUpUiUucLYce0IdJc5iJ4vaX49XWzhw6Gkuz_toZl6E3lPSUkLV5di6EeaWEWpaIlqi-Au0o5KzxlBNX6Id0Vw2Skt9ht6UMhJCqZDiNTpjneaEdHyH9lfhALkAhgOktWCXAi5ujWVwfo1Lwr_jeo-3CiwDjmnNLrniJjzH4B6Xyc14WDKGGfJPSP4BB9i7vM7Vhfd58RC2DKUGsb-PU8iQ3qJXg5sKvHua5-jHzefv17fN3bcvX6-v7hovmFmbzoce9GCUYqAU7bzqNKO6TqG4GkzX875e6c2ghOw6apQ0SrCeEk8DcMLP0cXJW9f4tUFZ7RyLh2lyCZatWEa41ERLwSv68T90XLac6naWUW5kx7k5CtmJ8nkpJcNg9znOLj9YSuyxDzvaYx_22IclwtY-aujDk3rrZwj_In8LqMCnEwD1F4cI2RYf6ychxAx-tWGJz_n_ACeanAI</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2138593380</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Adverse events and satisfaction with use of intranasal midazolam for emergency department procedures in children</title><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><source>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</source><creator>Malia, Laurie ; Laurich, V. Matt ; Sturm, Jesse J.</creator><creatorcontrib>Malia, Laurie ; Laurich, V. Matt ; Sturm, Jesse J.</creatorcontrib><description>Procedural sedation is commonly performed in the emergency department (ED). Having safe and fast means of providing sedation and anxiolysis to children is important for the child's tolerance of the procedure, parent satisfaction and efficient patient flow in the ED. To evaluate fasting times associated with the administration of intranasal midazolam (INM) and associated complications. Secondary objectives included assessing provider and caregiver satisfaction scores. A prospective observational study was conducted in children presenting to an urban pediatric emergency department who received INM for anxiolysis for a procedure or imaging. Data collected included last solid and liquid intake, procedure performed, sedation depth, adverse events and parent and provider satisfaction. 112 patients were enrolled. The mean age was 3.8 years. There were no adverse events experienced by any patients. Laceration repair was the most common reason for INM use. The median depth of sedation was 2.0 (cooperative/tranquil). The median liquid NPO time was 172.5 min and the median NPO time for solids was 194.0 min. 29.8% were NPO for liquids ≤2 h and 62.5% were NPO for solids ≤2 h. Parent and provider satisfaction was high: 90.4% of parents' and 88.4% of providers' satisfaction scores were a 4 or 5 on a 5 point Likert scale. Our data suggest that short NPO of both solids and liquids are safe for the use of INM. Additionally, parent and provider satisfaction scores were high with the use of INM.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0735-6757</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1532-8171</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.ajem.2018.04.063</identifier><identifier>PMID: 29730093</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Anesthesia ; Anxiolysis ; Caregivers ; Children ; Childrens health ; Drug dosages ; Emergency medical care ; Emergency medical services ; Emergency procedures ; Fasting ; Hypoxia ; Intranasal midazolam ; Likert scale ; Medical records ; Midazolam ; Observational studies ; Patients ; Pediatrics ; Physical restraints ; Physicians ; Quality of care ; Satisfaction ; Solids</subject><ispartof>The American journal of emergency medicine, 2019-01, Vol.37 (1), p.85-88</ispartof><rights>2018</rights><rights>Copyright © 2018. Published by Elsevier Inc.</rights><rights>Copyright Elsevier Limited Jan 2019</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c428t-9cdbe7f8662e6619c6972179c64636f89b3b817c8f6459918658642b10c1de303</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c428t-9cdbe7f8662e6619c6972179c64636f89b3b817c8f6459918658642b10c1de303</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2138593380?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,3537,27905,27906,45976,64364,64366,64368,72218</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29730093$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Malia, Laurie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Laurich, V. Matt</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sturm, Jesse J.</creatorcontrib><title>Adverse events and satisfaction with use of intranasal midazolam for emergency department procedures in children</title><title>The American journal of emergency medicine</title><addtitle>Am J Emerg Med</addtitle><description>Procedural sedation is commonly performed in the emergency department (ED). Having safe and fast means of providing sedation and anxiolysis to children is important for the child's tolerance of the procedure, parent satisfaction and efficient patient flow in the ED. To evaluate fasting times associated with the administration of intranasal midazolam (INM) and associated complications. Secondary objectives included assessing provider and caregiver satisfaction scores. A prospective observational study was conducted in children presenting to an urban pediatric emergency department who received INM for anxiolysis for a procedure or imaging. Data collected included last solid and liquid intake, procedure performed, sedation depth, adverse events and parent and provider satisfaction. 112 patients were enrolled. The mean age was 3.8 years. There were no adverse events experienced by any patients. Laceration repair was the most common reason for INM use. The median depth of sedation was 2.0 (cooperative/tranquil). The median liquid NPO time was 172.5 min and the median NPO time for solids was 194.0 min. 29.8% were NPO for liquids ≤2 h and 62.5% were NPO for solids ≤2 h. Parent and provider satisfaction was high: 90.4% of parents' and 88.4% of providers' satisfaction scores were a 4 or 5 on a 5 point Likert scale. Our data suggest that short NPO of both solids and liquids are safe for the use of INM. Additionally, parent and provider satisfaction scores were high with the use of INM.</description><subject>Anesthesia</subject><subject>Anxiolysis</subject><subject>Caregivers</subject><subject>Children</subject><subject>Childrens health</subject><subject>Drug dosages</subject><subject>Emergency medical care</subject><subject>Emergency medical services</subject><subject>Emergency procedures</subject><subject>Fasting</subject><subject>Hypoxia</subject><subject>Intranasal midazolam</subject><subject>Likert scale</subject><subject>Medical records</subject><subject>Midazolam</subject><subject>Observational studies</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>Pediatrics</subject><subject>Physical restraints</subject><subject>Physicians</subject><subject>Quality of care</subject><subject>Satisfaction</subject><subject>Solids</subject><issn>0735-6757</issn><issn>1532-8171</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kU1v1DAQhi0EokvhD3BAlrj0ktTfdiQuVUUpUiUucLYce0IdJc5iJ4vaX49XWzhw6Gkuz_toZl6E3lPSUkLV5di6EeaWEWpaIlqi-Au0o5KzxlBNX6Id0Vw2Skt9ht6UMhJCqZDiNTpjneaEdHyH9lfhALkAhgOktWCXAi5ujWVwfo1Lwr_jeo-3CiwDjmnNLrniJjzH4B6Xyc14WDKGGfJPSP4BB9i7vM7Vhfd58RC2DKUGsb-PU8iQ3qJXg5sKvHua5-jHzefv17fN3bcvX6-v7hovmFmbzoce9GCUYqAU7bzqNKO6TqG4GkzX875e6c2ghOw6apQ0SrCeEk8DcMLP0cXJW9f4tUFZ7RyLh2lyCZatWEa41ERLwSv68T90XLac6naWUW5kx7k5CtmJ8nkpJcNg9znOLj9YSuyxDzvaYx_22IclwtY-aujDk3rrZwj_In8LqMCnEwD1F4cI2RYf6ychxAx-tWGJz_n_ACeanAI</recordid><startdate>20190101</startdate><enddate>20190101</enddate><creator>Malia, Laurie</creator><creator>Laurich, V. Matt</creator><creator>Sturm, Jesse J.</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><general>Elsevier Limited</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20190101</creationdate><title>Adverse events and satisfaction with use of intranasal midazolam for emergency department procedures in children</title><author>Malia, Laurie ; Laurich, V. Matt ; Sturm, Jesse J.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c428t-9cdbe7f8662e6619c6972179c64636f89b3b817c8f6459918658642b10c1de303</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Anesthesia</topic><topic>Anxiolysis</topic><topic>Caregivers</topic><topic>Children</topic><topic>Childrens health</topic><topic>Drug dosages</topic><topic>Emergency medical care</topic><topic>Emergency medical services</topic><topic>Emergency procedures</topic><topic>Fasting</topic><topic>Hypoxia</topic><topic>Intranasal midazolam</topic><topic>Likert scale</topic><topic>Medical records</topic><topic>Midazolam</topic><topic>Observational studies</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>Pediatrics</topic><topic>Physical restraints</topic><topic>Physicians</topic><topic>Quality of care</topic><topic>Satisfaction</topic><topic>Solids</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Malia, Laurie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Laurich, V. Matt</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sturm, Jesse J.</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>The American journal of emergency medicine</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Malia, Laurie</au><au>Laurich, V. Matt</au><au>Sturm, Jesse J.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Adverse events and satisfaction with use of intranasal midazolam for emergency department procedures in children</atitle><jtitle>The American journal of emergency medicine</jtitle><addtitle>Am J Emerg Med</addtitle><date>2019-01-01</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>37</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>85</spage><epage>88</epage><pages>85-88</pages><issn>0735-6757</issn><eissn>1532-8171</eissn><abstract>Procedural sedation is commonly performed in the emergency department (ED). Having safe and fast means of providing sedation and anxiolysis to children is important for the child's tolerance of the procedure, parent satisfaction and efficient patient flow in the ED. To evaluate fasting times associated with the administration of intranasal midazolam (INM) and associated complications. Secondary objectives included assessing provider and caregiver satisfaction scores. A prospective observational study was conducted in children presenting to an urban pediatric emergency department who received INM for anxiolysis for a procedure or imaging. Data collected included last solid and liquid intake, procedure performed, sedation depth, adverse events and parent and provider satisfaction. 112 patients were enrolled. The mean age was 3.8 years. There were no adverse events experienced by any patients. Laceration repair was the most common reason for INM use. The median depth of sedation was 2.0 (cooperative/tranquil). The median liquid NPO time was 172.5 min and the median NPO time for solids was 194.0 min. 29.8% were NPO for liquids ≤2 h and 62.5% were NPO for solids ≤2 h. Parent and provider satisfaction was high: 90.4% of parents' and 88.4% of providers' satisfaction scores were a 4 or 5 on a 5 point Likert scale. Our data suggest that short NPO of both solids and liquids are safe for the use of INM. Additionally, parent and provider satisfaction scores were high with the use of INM.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>29730093</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.ajem.2018.04.063</doi><tpages>4</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0735-6757
ispartof The American journal of emergency medicine, 2019-01, Vol.37 (1), p.85-88
issn 0735-6757
1532-8171
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2035707543
source Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals; ProQuest Central UK/Ireland
subjects Anesthesia
Anxiolysis
Caregivers
Children
Childrens health
Drug dosages
Emergency medical care
Emergency medical services
Emergency procedures
Fasting
Hypoxia
Intranasal midazolam
Likert scale
Medical records
Midazolam
Observational studies
Patients
Pediatrics
Physical restraints
Physicians
Quality of care
Satisfaction
Solids
title Adverse events and satisfaction with use of intranasal midazolam for emergency department procedures in children
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-18T06%3A33%3A43IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Adverse%20events%20and%20satisfaction%20with%20use%20of%20intranasal%20midazolam%20for%20emergency%20department%20procedures%20in%20children&rft.jtitle=The%20American%20journal%20of%20emergency%20medicine&rft.au=Malia,%20Laurie&rft.date=2019-01-01&rft.volume=37&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=85&rft.epage=88&rft.pages=85-88&rft.issn=0735-6757&rft.eissn=1532-8171&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.ajem.2018.04.063&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2035707543%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2138593380&rft_id=info:pmid/29730093&rft_els_id=S0735675718303589&rfr_iscdi=true