Toward harmonization of clinical molecular diagnostic reports: findings of an international survey
The International Organization for Standardization (ISO) 15189 standard provides recommendations for the postexamination reporting phase to enhance quality in clinical laboratories. The purpose of this study was to encourage a broad discussion on current reporting practices for molecular diagnostic...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Clinical chemistry and laboratory medicine 2019-01, Vol.57 (1), p.78-88 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 88 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 78 |
container_title | Clinical chemistry and laboratory medicine |
container_volume | 57 |
creator | Payne, Deborah A. Baluchova, Katarina Russomando, Graciela Ahmad-Nejad, Parviz Mamotte, Cyril Rousseau, Francois van Schaik, Ron H.N. Marriott, Kristin Maekawa, Masato Chan, K.C. Allen |
description | The International Organization for Standardization (ISO) 15189 standard provides recommendations for the postexamination reporting phase to enhance quality in clinical laboratories. The purpose of this study was to encourage a broad discussion on current reporting practices for molecular diagnostic tests by conducting a global survey of such practices.
The International Federation of Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine's Committee for Molecular Diagnostics (IFCC C-MD) surveyed laboratories on selected ISO 15189 recommendations and topics. The survey addressed the following aspects: (1) laboratory demographics, (2) report format, (3) result reporting/layout, (4) comments in report and (5) interpretation and clinical decision-making information. Additionally, participants indicated categories needing standardization.
Sixteen responses from laboratories located in Asia, Europe, the Middle East, North America and South America were received. Several categories yielded 100% agreement between laboratories, whereas other categories had less than or equal to 50% concordance. Participants scored "nomenclature" and "description of methodologies" as the two most frequently cited aspects needing standardization.
The postexamination phase requires extensive and consistent communication between the laboratory, the healthcare provider and the end user. Surveyed laboratories were most likely to follow explicit ISO 15189 recommendations vs. recommendations when the term(s) "where appropriate or where applicable" was used. Interpretation and reporting of critical values varied among participants. Although the outcome of this study may not fully represent the practices of all molecular testing laboratories in countries around the world, the survey identified and specified several recommendations that are requirements for harmonized reporting in molecular diagnostics. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1515/cclm-2017-1080 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2035247306</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2035247306</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c534t-a6af71fe86600254ec70ffca86e8496848cdb71bea8d8ee753f113808c9f1f9c3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNptkE1v1DAQhi1ERUvhyhFF4sIlrSf-DJxQ1QJSpV7KOfI648WVYy92QrX8epxuAQn1NHN43ndGDyFvgJ6BAHFubZjajoJqgWr6jJwAZ6rljMHzh523UnZwTF6WckcpCMHVC3Lc9arrgfUnZHOb7k0em-8mTyn6X2b2KTbJNTb46K0JzZQC2iWY3IzebGMqs7dNxl3Kc_nQOB9HH7dljZjY-Dhjjg8lNVqW_BP3r8iRM6Hg68d5Sr5dXd5efGmvbz5_vfh03VrB-NwaaZwCh1pKSjvB0SrqnDVaoua91FzbcaNgg0aPGlEJ5gCYptr2Dlxv2Sl5f-jd5fRjwTIPky8WQzAR01KGjjLRccWorOi7_9C7tNS_Q6VAaso6zqBSZwfK5lRKRjfssp9M3g9Ah9X-sNofVvvDar8G3j7WLpsJx7_4H90V-HgA7k2ookbc5mVfl3_nn24WCpRmvwE-DJVv</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2168032431</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Toward harmonization of clinical molecular diagnostic reports: findings of an international survey</title><source>De Gruyter journals</source><creator>Payne, Deborah A. ; Baluchova, Katarina ; Russomando, Graciela ; Ahmad-Nejad, Parviz ; Mamotte, Cyril ; Rousseau, Francois ; van Schaik, Ron H.N. ; Marriott, Kristin ; Maekawa, Masato ; Chan, K.C. Allen</creator><creatorcontrib>Payne, Deborah A. ; Baluchova, Katarina ; Russomando, Graciela ; Ahmad-Nejad, Parviz ; Mamotte, Cyril ; Rousseau, Francois ; van Schaik, Ron H.N. ; Marriott, Kristin ; Maekawa, Masato ; Chan, K.C. Allen ; IFCC Committee on Molecular Diagnostics</creatorcontrib><description>The International Organization for Standardization (ISO) 15189 standard provides recommendations for the postexamination reporting phase to enhance quality in clinical laboratories. The purpose of this study was to encourage a broad discussion on current reporting practices for molecular diagnostic tests by conducting a global survey of such practices.
The International Federation of Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine's Committee for Molecular Diagnostics (IFCC C-MD) surveyed laboratories on selected ISO 15189 recommendations and topics. The survey addressed the following aspects: (1) laboratory demographics, (2) report format, (3) result reporting/layout, (4) comments in report and (5) interpretation and clinical decision-making information. Additionally, participants indicated categories needing standardization.
Sixteen responses from laboratories located in Asia, Europe, the Middle East, North America and South America were received. Several categories yielded 100% agreement between laboratories, whereas other categories had less than or equal to 50% concordance. Participants scored "nomenclature" and "description of methodologies" as the two most frequently cited aspects needing standardization.
The postexamination phase requires extensive and consistent communication between the laboratory, the healthcare provider and the end user. Surveyed laboratories were most likely to follow explicit ISO 15189 recommendations vs. recommendations when the term(s) "where appropriate or where applicable" was used. Interpretation and reporting of critical values varied among participants. Although the outcome of this study may not fully represent the practices of all molecular testing laboratories in countries around the world, the survey identified and specified several recommendations that are requirements for harmonized reporting in molecular diagnostics.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1434-6621</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1437-4331</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1515/cclm-2017-1080</identifier><identifier>PMID: 29729139</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Germany: De Gruyter</publisher><subject>Categories ; clinical genomics ; Decision making ; Demographics ; Demography ; Diagnostic systems ; Health care ; infectious diseases ; inherited diseases ; ISO 15189 ; Laboratories ; molecular pathology ; Nomenclature ; noninvasive prenatal testing ; oncology ; Organic chemistry ; pharmacogenomics ; precision medicine diagnostics ; Standardization ; Testing laboratories ; transplantation</subject><ispartof>Clinical chemistry and laboratory medicine, 2019-01, Vol.57 (1), p.78-88</ispartof><rights>2019 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c534t-a6af71fe86600254ec70ffca86e8496848cdb71bea8d8ee753f113808c9f1f9c3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c534t-a6af71fe86600254ec70ffca86e8496848cdb71bea8d8ee753f113808c9f1f9c3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.degruyter.com/document/doi/10.1515/cclm-2017-1080/pdf$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwalterdegruyter$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.degruyter.com/document/doi/10.1515/cclm-2017-1080/html$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwalterdegruyter$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902,66497,68281</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29729139$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Payne, Deborah A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Baluchova, Katarina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Russomando, Graciela</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ahmad-Nejad, Parviz</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mamotte, Cyril</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rousseau, Francois</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>van Schaik, Ron H.N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Marriott, Kristin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Maekawa, Masato</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chan, K.C. Allen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>IFCC Committee on Molecular Diagnostics</creatorcontrib><title>Toward harmonization of clinical molecular diagnostic reports: findings of an international survey</title><title>Clinical chemistry and laboratory medicine</title><addtitle>Clin Chem Lab Med</addtitle><description>The International Organization for Standardization (ISO) 15189 standard provides recommendations for the postexamination reporting phase to enhance quality in clinical laboratories. The purpose of this study was to encourage a broad discussion on current reporting practices for molecular diagnostic tests by conducting a global survey of such practices.
The International Federation of Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine's Committee for Molecular Diagnostics (IFCC C-MD) surveyed laboratories on selected ISO 15189 recommendations and topics. The survey addressed the following aspects: (1) laboratory demographics, (2) report format, (3) result reporting/layout, (4) comments in report and (5) interpretation and clinical decision-making information. Additionally, participants indicated categories needing standardization.
Sixteen responses from laboratories located in Asia, Europe, the Middle East, North America and South America were received. Several categories yielded 100% agreement between laboratories, whereas other categories had less than or equal to 50% concordance. Participants scored "nomenclature" and "description of methodologies" as the two most frequently cited aspects needing standardization.
The postexamination phase requires extensive and consistent communication between the laboratory, the healthcare provider and the end user. Surveyed laboratories were most likely to follow explicit ISO 15189 recommendations vs. recommendations when the term(s) "where appropriate or where applicable" was used. Interpretation and reporting of critical values varied among participants. Although the outcome of this study may not fully represent the practices of all molecular testing laboratories in countries around the world, the survey identified and specified several recommendations that are requirements for harmonized reporting in molecular diagnostics.</description><subject>Categories</subject><subject>clinical genomics</subject><subject>Decision making</subject><subject>Demographics</subject><subject>Demography</subject><subject>Diagnostic systems</subject><subject>Health care</subject><subject>infectious diseases</subject><subject>inherited diseases</subject><subject>ISO 15189</subject><subject>Laboratories</subject><subject>molecular pathology</subject><subject>Nomenclature</subject><subject>noninvasive prenatal testing</subject><subject>oncology</subject><subject>Organic chemistry</subject><subject>pharmacogenomics</subject><subject>precision medicine diagnostics</subject><subject>Standardization</subject><subject>Testing laboratories</subject><subject>transplantation</subject><issn>1434-6621</issn><issn>1437-4331</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNptkE1v1DAQhi1ERUvhyhFF4sIlrSf-DJxQ1QJSpV7KOfI648WVYy92QrX8epxuAQn1NHN43ndGDyFvgJ6BAHFubZjajoJqgWr6jJwAZ6rljMHzh523UnZwTF6WckcpCMHVC3Lc9arrgfUnZHOb7k0em-8mTyn6X2b2KTbJNTb46K0JzZQC2iWY3IzebGMqs7dNxl3Kc_nQOB9HH7dljZjY-Dhjjg8lNVqW_BP3r8iRM6Hg68d5Sr5dXd5efGmvbz5_vfh03VrB-NwaaZwCh1pKSjvB0SrqnDVaoua91FzbcaNgg0aPGlEJ5gCYptr2Dlxv2Sl5f-jd5fRjwTIPky8WQzAR01KGjjLRccWorOi7_9C7tNS_Q6VAaso6zqBSZwfK5lRKRjfssp9M3g9Ah9X-sNofVvvDar8G3j7WLpsJx7_4H90V-HgA7k2ookbc5mVfl3_nn24WCpRmvwE-DJVv</recordid><startdate>20190101</startdate><enddate>20190101</enddate><creator>Payne, Deborah A.</creator><creator>Baluchova, Katarina</creator><creator>Russomando, Graciela</creator><creator>Ahmad-Nejad, Parviz</creator><creator>Mamotte, Cyril</creator><creator>Rousseau, Francois</creator><creator>van Schaik, Ron H.N.</creator><creator>Marriott, Kristin</creator><creator>Maekawa, Masato</creator><creator>Chan, K.C. Allen</creator><general>De Gruyter</general><general>Walter De Gruyter & Company</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>7U7</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20190101</creationdate><title>Toward harmonization of clinical molecular diagnostic reports: findings of an international survey</title><author>Payne, Deborah A. ; Baluchova, Katarina ; Russomando, Graciela ; Ahmad-Nejad, Parviz ; Mamotte, Cyril ; Rousseau, Francois ; van Schaik, Ron H.N. ; Marriott, Kristin ; Maekawa, Masato ; Chan, K.C. Allen</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c534t-a6af71fe86600254ec70ffca86e8496848cdb71bea8d8ee753f113808c9f1f9c3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Categories</topic><topic>clinical genomics</topic><topic>Decision making</topic><topic>Demographics</topic><topic>Demography</topic><topic>Diagnostic systems</topic><topic>Health care</topic><topic>infectious diseases</topic><topic>inherited diseases</topic><topic>ISO 15189</topic><topic>Laboratories</topic><topic>molecular pathology</topic><topic>Nomenclature</topic><topic>noninvasive prenatal testing</topic><topic>oncology</topic><topic>Organic chemistry</topic><topic>pharmacogenomics</topic><topic>precision medicine diagnostics</topic><topic>Standardization</topic><topic>Testing laboratories</topic><topic>transplantation</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Payne, Deborah A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Baluchova, Katarina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Russomando, Graciela</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ahmad-Nejad, Parviz</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mamotte, Cyril</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rousseau, Francois</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>van Schaik, Ron H.N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Marriott, Kristin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Maekawa, Masato</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chan, K.C. Allen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>IFCC Committee on Molecular Diagnostics</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>Toxicology Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Clinical chemistry and laboratory medicine</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Payne, Deborah A.</au><au>Baluchova, Katarina</au><au>Russomando, Graciela</au><au>Ahmad-Nejad, Parviz</au><au>Mamotte, Cyril</au><au>Rousseau, Francois</au><au>van Schaik, Ron H.N.</au><au>Marriott, Kristin</au><au>Maekawa, Masato</au><au>Chan, K.C. Allen</au><aucorp>IFCC Committee on Molecular Diagnostics</aucorp><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Toward harmonization of clinical molecular diagnostic reports: findings of an international survey</atitle><jtitle>Clinical chemistry and laboratory medicine</jtitle><addtitle>Clin Chem Lab Med</addtitle><date>2019-01-01</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>57</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>78</spage><epage>88</epage><pages>78-88</pages><issn>1434-6621</issn><eissn>1437-4331</eissn><abstract>The International Organization for Standardization (ISO) 15189 standard provides recommendations for the postexamination reporting phase to enhance quality in clinical laboratories. The purpose of this study was to encourage a broad discussion on current reporting practices for molecular diagnostic tests by conducting a global survey of such practices.
The International Federation of Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine's Committee for Molecular Diagnostics (IFCC C-MD) surveyed laboratories on selected ISO 15189 recommendations and topics. The survey addressed the following aspects: (1) laboratory demographics, (2) report format, (3) result reporting/layout, (4) comments in report and (5) interpretation and clinical decision-making information. Additionally, participants indicated categories needing standardization.
Sixteen responses from laboratories located in Asia, Europe, the Middle East, North America and South America were received. Several categories yielded 100% agreement between laboratories, whereas other categories had less than or equal to 50% concordance. Participants scored "nomenclature" and "description of methodologies" as the two most frequently cited aspects needing standardization.
The postexamination phase requires extensive and consistent communication between the laboratory, the healthcare provider and the end user. Surveyed laboratories were most likely to follow explicit ISO 15189 recommendations vs. recommendations when the term(s) "where appropriate or where applicable" was used. Interpretation and reporting of critical values varied among participants. Although the outcome of this study may not fully represent the practices of all molecular testing laboratories in countries around the world, the survey identified and specified several recommendations that are requirements for harmonized reporting in molecular diagnostics.</abstract><cop>Germany</cop><pub>De Gruyter</pub><pmid>29729139</pmid><doi>10.1515/cclm-2017-1080</doi><tpages>11</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1434-6621 |
ispartof | Clinical chemistry and laboratory medicine, 2019-01, Vol.57 (1), p.78-88 |
issn | 1434-6621 1437-4331 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2035247306 |
source | De Gruyter journals |
subjects | Categories clinical genomics Decision making Demographics Demography Diagnostic systems Health care infectious diseases inherited diseases ISO 15189 Laboratories molecular pathology Nomenclature noninvasive prenatal testing oncology Organic chemistry pharmacogenomics precision medicine diagnostics Standardization Testing laboratories transplantation |
title | Toward harmonization of clinical molecular diagnostic reports: findings of an international survey |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-29T00%3A38%3A00IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Toward%20harmonization%20of%20clinical%20molecular%20diagnostic%20reports:%20findings%20of%20an%20international%20survey&rft.jtitle=Clinical%20chemistry%20and%20laboratory%20medicine&rft.au=Payne,%20Deborah%20A.&rft.aucorp=IFCC%20Committee%20on%20Molecular%20Diagnostics&rft.date=2019-01-01&rft.volume=57&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=78&rft.epage=88&rft.pages=78-88&rft.issn=1434-6621&rft.eissn=1437-4331&rft_id=info:doi/10.1515/cclm-2017-1080&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2035247306%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2168032431&rft_id=info:pmid/29729139&rfr_iscdi=true |