Toward harmonization of clinical molecular diagnostic reports: findings of an international survey

The International Organization for Standardization (ISO) 15189 standard provides recommendations for the postexamination reporting phase to enhance quality in clinical laboratories. The purpose of this study was to encourage a broad discussion on current reporting practices for molecular diagnostic...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Clinical chemistry and laboratory medicine 2019-01, Vol.57 (1), p.78-88
Hauptverfasser: Payne, Deborah A., Baluchova, Katarina, Russomando, Graciela, Ahmad-Nejad, Parviz, Mamotte, Cyril, Rousseau, Francois, van Schaik, Ron H.N., Marriott, Kristin, Maekawa, Masato, Chan, K.C. Allen
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 88
container_issue 1
container_start_page 78
container_title Clinical chemistry and laboratory medicine
container_volume 57
creator Payne, Deborah A.
Baluchova, Katarina
Russomando, Graciela
Ahmad-Nejad, Parviz
Mamotte, Cyril
Rousseau, Francois
van Schaik, Ron H.N.
Marriott, Kristin
Maekawa, Masato
Chan, K.C. Allen
description The International Organization for Standardization (ISO) 15189 standard provides recommendations for the postexamination reporting phase to enhance quality in clinical laboratories. The purpose of this study was to encourage a broad discussion on current reporting practices for molecular diagnostic tests by conducting a global survey of such practices. The International Federation of Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine's Committee for Molecular Diagnostics (IFCC C-MD) surveyed laboratories on selected ISO 15189 recommendations and topics. The survey addressed the following aspects: (1) laboratory demographics, (2) report format, (3) result reporting/layout, (4) comments in report and (5) interpretation and clinical decision-making information. Additionally, participants indicated categories needing standardization. Sixteen responses from laboratories located in Asia, Europe, the Middle East, North America and South America were received. Several categories yielded 100% agreement between laboratories, whereas other categories had less than or equal to 50% concordance. Participants scored "nomenclature" and "description of methodologies" as the two most frequently cited aspects needing standardization. The postexamination phase requires extensive and consistent communication between the laboratory, the healthcare provider and the end user. Surveyed laboratories were most likely to follow explicit ISO 15189 recommendations vs. recommendations when the term(s) "where appropriate or where applicable" was used. Interpretation and reporting of critical values varied among participants. Although the outcome of this study may not fully represent the practices of all molecular testing laboratories in countries around the world, the survey identified and specified several recommendations that are requirements for harmonized reporting in molecular diagnostics.
doi_str_mv 10.1515/cclm-2017-1080
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2035247306</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2035247306</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c534t-a6af71fe86600254ec70ffca86e8496848cdb71bea8d8ee753f113808c9f1f9c3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNptkE1v1DAQhi1ERUvhyhFF4sIlrSf-DJxQ1QJSpV7KOfI648WVYy92QrX8epxuAQn1NHN43ndGDyFvgJ6BAHFubZjajoJqgWr6jJwAZ6rljMHzh523UnZwTF6WckcpCMHVC3Lc9arrgfUnZHOb7k0em-8mTyn6X2b2KTbJNTb46K0JzZQC2iWY3IzebGMqs7dNxl3Kc_nQOB9HH7dljZjY-Dhjjg8lNVqW_BP3r8iRM6Hg68d5Sr5dXd5efGmvbz5_vfh03VrB-NwaaZwCh1pKSjvB0SrqnDVaoua91FzbcaNgg0aPGlEJ5gCYptr2Dlxv2Sl5f-jd5fRjwTIPky8WQzAR01KGjjLRccWorOi7_9C7tNS_Q6VAaso6zqBSZwfK5lRKRjfssp9M3g9Ah9X-sNofVvvDar8G3j7WLpsJx7_4H90V-HgA7k2ookbc5mVfl3_nn24WCpRmvwE-DJVv</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2168032431</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Toward harmonization of clinical molecular diagnostic reports: findings of an international survey</title><source>De Gruyter journals</source><creator>Payne, Deborah A. ; Baluchova, Katarina ; Russomando, Graciela ; Ahmad-Nejad, Parviz ; Mamotte, Cyril ; Rousseau, Francois ; van Schaik, Ron H.N. ; Marriott, Kristin ; Maekawa, Masato ; Chan, K.C. Allen</creator><creatorcontrib>Payne, Deborah A. ; Baluchova, Katarina ; Russomando, Graciela ; Ahmad-Nejad, Parviz ; Mamotte, Cyril ; Rousseau, Francois ; van Schaik, Ron H.N. ; Marriott, Kristin ; Maekawa, Masato ; Chan, K.C. Allen ; IFCC Committee on Molecular Diagnostics</creatorcontrib><description>The International Organization for Standardization (ISO) 15189 standard provides recommendations for the postexamination reporting phase to enhance quality in clinical laboratories. The purpose of this study was to encourage a broad discussion on current reporting practices for molecular diagnostic tests by conducting a global survey of such practices. The International Federation of Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine's Committee for Molecular Diagnostics (IFCC C-MD) surveyed laboratories on selected ISO 15189 recommendations and topics. The survey addressed the following aspects: (1) laboratory demographics, (2) report format, (3) result reporting/layout, (4) comments in report and (5) interpretation and clinical decision-making information. Additionally, participants indicated categories needing standardization. Sixteen responses from laboratories located in Asia, Europe, the Middle East, North America and South America were received. Several categories yielded 100% agreement between laboratories, whereas other categories had less than or equal to 50% concordance. Participants scored "nomenclature" and "description of methodologies" as the two most frequently cited aspects needing standardization. The postexamination phase requires extensive and consistent communication between the laboratory, the healthcare provider and the end user. Surveyed laboratories were most likely to follow explicit ISO 15189 recommendations vs. recommendations when the term(s) "where appropriate or where applicable" was used. Interpretation and reporting of critical values varied among participants. Although the outcome of this study may not fully represent the practices of all molecular testing laboratories in countries around the world, the survey identified and specified several recommendations that are requirements for harmonized reporting in molecular diagnostics.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1434-6621</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1437-4331</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1515/cclm-2017-1080</identifier><identifier>PMID: 29729139</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Germany: De Gruyter</publisher><subject>Categories ; clinical genomics ; Decision making ; Demographics ; Demography ; Diagnostic systems ; Health care ; infectious diseases ; inherited diseases ; ISO 15189 ; Laboratories ; molecular pathology ; Nomenclature ; noninvasive prenatal testing ; oncology ; Organic chemistry ; pharmacogenomics ; precision medicine diagnostics ; Standardization ; Testing laboratories ; transplantation</subject><ispartof>Clinical chemistry and laboratory medicine, 2019-01, Vol.57 (1), p.78-88</ispartof><rights>2019 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c534t-a6af71fe86600254ec70ffca86e8496848cdb71bea8d8ee753f113808c9f1f9c3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c534t-a6af71fe86600254ec70ffca86e8496848cdb71bea8d8ee753f113808c9f1f9c3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.degruyter.com/document/doi/10.1515/cclm-2017-1080/pdf$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwalterdegruyter$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.degruyter.com/document/doi/10.1515/cclm-2017-1080/html$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwalterdegruyter$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902,66497,68281</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29729139$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Payne, Deborah A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Baluchova, Katarina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Russomando, Graciela</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ahmad-Nejad, Parviz</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mamotte, Cyril</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rousseau, Francois</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>van Schaik, Ron H.N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Marriott, Kristin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Maekawa, Masato</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chan, K.C. Allen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>IFCC Committee on Molecular Diagnostics</creatorcontrib><title>Toward harmonization of clinical molecular diagnostic reports: findings of an international survey</title><title>Clinical chemistry and laboratory medicine</title><addtitle>Clin Chem Lab Med</addtitle><description>The International Organization for Standardization (ISO) 15189 standard provides recommendations for the postexamination reporting phase to enhance quality in clinical laboratories. The purpose of this study was to encourage a broad discussion on current reporting practices for molecular diagnostic tests by conducting a global survey of such practices. The International Federation of Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine's Committee for Molecular Diagnostics (IFCC C-MD) surveyed laboratories on selected ISO 15189 recommendations and topics. The survey addressed the following aspects: (1) laboratory demographics, (2) report format, (3) result reporting/layout, (4) comments in report and (5) interpretation and clinical decision-making information. Additionally, participants indicated categories needing standardization. Sixteen responses from laboratories located in Asia, Europe, the Middle East, North America and South America were received. Several categories yielded 100% agreement between laboratories, whereas other categories had less than or equal to 50% concordance. Participants scored "nomenclature" and "description of methodologies" as the two most frequently cited aspects needing standardization. The postexamination phase requires extensive and consistent communication between the laboratory, the healthcare provider and the end user. Surveyed laboratories were most likely to follow explicit ISO 15189 recommendations vs. recommendations when the term(s) "where appropriate or where applicable" was used. Interpretation and reporting of critical values varied among participants. Although the outcome of this study may not fully represent the practices of all molecular testing laboratories in countries around the world, the survey identified and specified several recommendations that are requirements for harmonized reporting in molecular diagnostics.</description><subject>Categories</subject><subject>clinical genomics</subject><subject>Decision making</subject><subject>Demographics</subject><subject>Demography</subject><subject>Diagnostic systems</subject><subject>Health care</subject><subject>infectious diseases</subject><subject>inherited diseases</subject><subject>ISO 15189</subject><subject>Laboratories</subject><subject>molecular pathology</subject><subject>Nomenclature</subject><subject>noninvasive prenatal testing</subject><subject>oncology</subject><subject>Organic chemistry</subject><subject>pharmacogenomics</subject><subject>precision medicine diagnostics</subject><subject>Standardization</subject><subject>Testing laboratories</subject><subject>transplantation</subject><issn>1434-6621</issn><issn>1437-4331</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNptkE1v1DAQhi1ERUvhyhFF4sIlrSf-DJxQ1QJSpV7KOfI648WVYy92QrX8epxuAQn1NHN43ndGDyFvgJ6BAHFubZjajoJqgWr6jJwAZ6rljMHzh523UnZwTF6WckcpCMHVC3Lc9arrgfUnZHOb7k0em-8mTyn6X2b2KTbJNTb46K0JzZQC2iWY3IzebGMqs7dNxl3Kc_nQOB9HH7dljZjY-Dhjjg8lNVqW_BP3r8iRM6Hg68d5Sr5dXd5efGmvbz5_vfh03VrB-NwaaZwCh1pKSjvB0SrqnDVaoua91FzbcaNgg0aPGlEJ5gCYptr2Dlxv2Sl5f-jd5fRjwTIPky8WQzAR01KGjjLRccWorOi7_9C7tNS_Q6VAaso6zqBSZwfK5lRKRjfssp9M3g9Ah9X-sNofVvvDar8G3j7WLpsJx7_4H90V-HgA7k2ookbc5mVfl3_nn24WCpRmvwE-DJVv</recordid><startdate>20190101</startdate><enddate>20190101</enddate><creator>Payne, Deborah A.</creator><creator>Baluchova, Katarina</creator><creator>Russomando, Graciela</creator><creator>Ahmad-Nejad, Parviz</creator><creator>Mamotte, Cyril</creator><creator>Rousseau, Francois</creator><creator>van Schaik, Ron H.N.</creator><creator>Marriott, Kristin</creator><creator>Maekawa, Masato</creator><creator>Chan, K.C. Allen</creator><general>De Gruyter</general><general>Walter De Gruyter &amp; Company</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>7U7</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20190101</creationdate><title>Toward harmonization of clinical molecular diagnostic reports: findings of an international survey</title><author>Payne, Deborah A. ; Baluchova, Katarina ; Russomando, Graciela ; Ahmad-Nejad, Parviz ; Mamotte, Cyril ; Rousseau, Francois ; van Schaik, Ron H.N. ; Marriott, Kristin ; Maekawa, Masato ; Chan, K.C. Allen</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c534t-a6af71fe86600254ec70ffca86e8496848cdb71bea8d8ee753f113808c9f1f9c3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Categories</topic><topic>clinical genomics</topic><topic>Decision making</topic><topic>Demographics</topic><topic>Demography</topic><topic>Diagnostic systems</topic><topic>Health care</topic><topic>infectious diseases</topic><topic>inherited diseases</topic><topic>ISO 15189</topic><topic>Laboratories</topic><topic>molecular pathology</topic><topic>Nomenclature</topic><topic>noninvasive prenatal testing</topic><topic>oncology</topic><topic>Organic chemistry</topic><topic>pharmacogenomics</topic><topic>precision medicine diagnostics</topic><topic>Standardization</topic><topic>Testing laboratories</topic><topic>transplantation</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Payne, Deborah A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Baluchova, Katarina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Russomando, Graciela</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ahmad-Nejad, Parviz</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mamotte, Cyril</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rousseau, Francois</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>van Schaik, Ron H.N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Marriott, Kristin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Maekawa, Masato</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chan, K.C. Allen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>IFCC Committee on Molecular Diagnostics</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>Toxicology Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Clinical chemistry and laboratory medicine</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Payne, Deborah A.</au><au>Baluchova, Katarina</au><au>Russomando, Graciela</au><au>Ahmad-Nejad, Parviz</au><au>Mamotte, Cyril</au><au>Rousseau, Francois</au><au>van Schaik, Ron H.N.</au><au>Marriott, Kristin</au><au>Maekawa, Masato</au><au>Chan, K.C. Allen</au><aucorp>IFCC Committee on Molecular Diagnostics</aucorp><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Toward harmonization of clinical molecular diagnostic reports: findings of an international survey</atitle><jtitle>Clinical chemistry and laboratory medicine</jtitle><addtitle>Clin Chem Lab Med</addtitle><date>2019-01-01</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>57</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>78</spage><epage>88</epage><pages>78-88</pages><issn>1434-6621</issn><eissn>1437-4331</eissn><abstract>The International Organization for Standardization (ISO) 15189 standard provides recommendations for the postexamination reporting phase to enhance quality in clinical laboratories. The purpose of this study was to encourage a broad discussion on current reporting practices for molecular diagnostic tests by conducting a global survey of such practices. The International Federation of Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine's Committee for Molecular Diagnostics (IFCC C-MD) surveyed laboratories on selected ISO 15189 recommendations and topics. The survey addressed the following aspects: (1) laboratory demographics, (2) report format, (3) result reporting/layout, (4) comments in report and (5) interpretation and clinical decision-making information. Additionally, participants indicated categories needing standardization. Sixteen responses from laboratories located in Asia, Europe, the Middle East, North America and South America were received. Several categories yielded 100% agreement between laboratories, whereas other categories had less than or equal to 50% concordance. Participants scored "nomenclature" and "description of methodologies" as the two most frequently cited aspects needing standardization. The postexamination phase requires extensive and consistent communication between the laboratory, the healthcare provider and the end user. Surveyed laboratories were most likely to follow explicit ISO 15189 recommendations vs. recommendations when the term(s) "where appropriate or where applicable" was used. Interpretation and reporting of critical values varied among participants. Although the outcome of this study may not fully represent the practices of all molecular testing laboratories in countries around the world, the survey identified and specified several recommendations that are requirements for harmonized reporting in molecular diagnostics.</abstract><cop>Germany</cop><pub>De Gruyter</pub><pmid>29729139</pmid><doi>10.1515/cclm-2017-1080</doi><tpages>11</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1434-6621
ispartof Clinical chemistry and laboratory medicine, 2019-01, Vol.57 (1), p.78-88
issn 1434-6621
1437-4331
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2035247306
source De Gruyter journals
subjects Categories
clinical genomics
Decision making
Demographics
Demography
Diagnostic systems
Health care
infectious diseases
inherited diseases
ISO 15189
Laboratories
molecular pathology
Nomenclature
noninvasive prenatal testing
oncology
Organic chemistry
pharmacogenomics
precision medicine diagnostics
Standardization
Testing laboratories
transplantation
title Toward harmonization of clinical molecular diagnostic reports: findings of an international survey
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-29T00%3A38%3A00IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Toward%20harmonization%20of%20clinical%20molecular%20diagnostic%20reports:%20findings%20of%20an%20international%20survey&rft.jtitle=Clinical%20chemistry%20and%20laboratory%20medicine&rft.au=Payne,%20Deborah%20A.&rft.aucorp=IFCC%20Committee%20on%20Molecular%20Diagnostics&rft.date=2019-01-01&rft.volume=57&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=78&rft.epage=88&rft.pages=78-88&rft.issn=1434-6621&rft.eissn=1437-4331&rft_id=info:doi/10.1515/cclm-2017-1080&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2035247306%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2168032431&rft_id=info:pmid/29729139&rfr_iscdi=true