Compliance with a structured bedside handover protocol: An observational, multicentred study

Bedside handover is the delivery of the nurse-to-nurse shift handover at the patient’s bedside. The method is increasingly used in nursing, but the evidence concerning the implementation process and compliance to the method is limited. To determine the compliance with a structured bedside handover p...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:International journal of nursing studies 2018-08, Vol.84, p.12-18
Hauptverfasser: Malfait, S., Eeckloo, K., Van Biesen, W., Deryckere, M., Lust, E., Van Hecke, A.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 18
container_issue
container_start_page 12
container_title International journal of nursing studies
container_volume 84
creator Malfait, S.
Eeckloo, K.
Van Biesen, W.
Deryckere, M.
Lust, E.
Van Hecke, A.
description Bedside handover is the delivery of the nurse-to-nurse shift handover at the patient’s bedside. The method is increasingly used in nursing, but the evidence concerning the implementation process and compliance to the method is limited. To determine the compliance with a structured bedside handover protocol following ISBARR and if there were differences in compliance between wards. A multicentred observational study with unannounced and non-participatory observations (n = 638) one month after the implementation of a structured bedside handover protocol. Observations of individual patient handovers between nurses from the morning shift and the afternoon shift in 12 nursing wards in seven hospitals in Flanders, Belgium. A tailored and structured bedside handover protocol following ISBARR was developed, and nurses were trained accordingly. One month after implementation, a minimum of 50 observations were performed with a checklist, in each participating ward. To enhance reliability, 20% of the observations were conducted by two researchers, and inter-rater agreement was calculated. Data were analysed using descriptive statistics, one-way ANOVAs and multilevel analysis. Average compliance rates to the structured content protocol during bedside handovers were high (83.63%; SD 11.44%), and length of stay, the type of ward and the nursing care model were influencing contextual factors. Items that were most often omitted included identification of the patient (46.27%), the introduction of nurses (36.51%), hand hygiene (35.89%), actively involving the patient (34.44%), and using the call light (21.37%). Items concerning the exchange of clinical information (e.g., test results, reason for admittance, diagnoses) were omitted less (8.09%–1.45%). Absence of the patients (27.29%) and staffing issues (26.70%) accounted for more than half of the non-executed bedside handovers. On average, a bedside handover took 146 s per patient. When the bedside handover was delivered, compliance to the structured content was high, indicating that the execution of a bedside handover is a feasible step for nurses. The compliance rate was influenced by the patient’s length of stay, the nursing care model and the type of ward, but their influence was limited. Future implementation projects on bedside handover should focus sufficiently on standard hospital procedures and patient involvement. According to the nurses, there was however a high number of situations where bedside handovers could
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2018.04.011
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2035246934</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0020748918300968</els_id><sourcerecordid>2091251591</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c396t-3409543c499d0ef00317e46e999cb16f0259f40e33ad6e0262751329a226bd023</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkEtr3DAUhUVpaKZp_0IwdNNF7V49bI-6ahj6gkA2KXRRELJ0TWRsa6rHhPz7aJiki266upvvnHv4CLmk0FCg3cepcdOaQ0y5YUC3DYgGKH1BNnTb81pI-usl2QAwqHuxlefkdYwTQCFh-4qcM9kz2bb9hvze-WU_O70arO5duqt0FVPIJuWAthrQRmexutOr9QcM1T745I2fP1VXa-WHiOGgk_Ornj9US56TM7imY7IMsw9vyNmo54hvn-4F-fn1y-3ue3198-3H7uq6Nlx2qeYCZCu4EVJawBGA0x5Fh1JKM9BuBNbKUQByrm2HwDrWt5QzqRnrBguMX5D3p94y70_GmNTiosF51iv6HBUD3jLRSS4K-u4fdPI5lP1HSlLW0lbSQnUnygQfY8BR7YNbdHhQFNTRv5rUs3919K9AqOK_BC-f6vOwoP0bexZegM8nAIuPg8OgonFY7FsX0CRlvfvfj0fDhpoB</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2091251591</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Compliance with a structured bedside handover protocol: An observational, multicentred study</title><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete</source><source>Applied Social Sciences Index &amp; Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><creator>Malfait, S. ; Eeckloo, K. ; Van Biesen, W. ; Deryckere, M. ; Lust, E. ; Van Hecke, A.</creator><creatorcontrib>Malfait, S. ; Eeckloo, K. ; Van Biesen, W. ; Deryckere, M. ; Lust, E. ; Van Hecke, A.</creatorcontrib><description>Bedside handover is the delivery of the nurse-to-nurse shift handover at the patient’s bedside. The method is increasingly used in nursing, but the evidence concerning the implementation process and compliance to the method is limited. To determine the compliance with a structured bedside handover protocol following ISBARR and if there were differences in compliance between wards. A multicentred observational study with unannounced and non-participatory observations (n = 638) one month after the implementation of a structured bedside handover protocol. Observations of individual patient handovers between nurses from the morning shift and the afternoon shift in 12 nursing wards in seven hospitals in Flanders, Belgium. A tailored and structured bedside handover protocol following ISBARR was developed, and nurses were trained accordingly. One month after implementation, a minimum of 50 observations were performed with a checklist, in each participating ward. To enhance reliability, 20% of the observations were conducted by two researchers, and inter-rater agreement was calculated. Data were analysed using descriptive statistics, one-way ANOVAs and multilevel analysis. Average compliance rates to the structured content protocol during bedside handovers were high (83.63%; SD 11.44%), and length of stay, the type of ward and the nursing care model were influencing contextual factors. Items that were most often omitted included identification of the patient (46.27%), the introduction of nurses (36.51%), hand hygiene (35.89%), actively involving the patient (34.44%), and using the call light (21.37%). Items concerning the exchange of clinical information (e.g., test results, reason for admittance, diagnoses) were omitted less (8.09%–1.45%). Absence of the patients (27.29%) and staffing issues (26.70%) accounted for more than half of the non-executed bedside handovers. On average, a bedside handover took 146 s per patient. When the bedside handover was delivered, compliance to the structured content was high, indicating that the execution of a bedside handover is a feasible step for nurses. The compliance rate was influenced by the patient’s length of stay, the nursing care model and the type of ward, but their influence was limited. Future implementation projects on bedside handover should focus sufficiently on standard hospital procedures and patient involvement. According to the nurses, there was however a high number of situations where bedside handovers could not be delivered, perhaps indicating a reluctance in practice to use bedside handovers.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0020-7489</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-491X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2018.04.011</identifier><identifier>PMID: 29729557</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Averages ; Bedside handover ; Clinical information ; Compliance ; Continuity of care ; Handover ; Handover duration ; Hospitals ; Hygiene ; Implementation ; Intervention compliance ; Length of stay ; Multilevel analysis ; Nurses ; Nursing ; Nursing care ; Observations ; Patient participation ; Professional identity ; Protocol ; Reliability ; Staffing</subject><ispartof>International journal of nursing studies, 2018-08, Vol.84, p.12-18</ispartof><rights>2018 Elsevier Ltd</rights><rights>Copyright © 2018 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.</rights><rights>Copyright Elsevier Science Ltd. Aug 2018</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c396t-3409543c499d0ef00317e46e999cb16f0259f40e33ad6e0262751329a226bd023</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c396t-3409543c499d0ef00317e46e999cb16f0259f40e33ad6e0262751329a226bd023</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-2263-0260 ; 0000-0001-7287-6034 ; 0000-0003-3576-7159</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2018.04.011$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>315,782,786,3552,27931,27932,31006,46002</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29729557$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Malfait, S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Eeckloo, K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Van Biesen, W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Deryckere, M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lust, E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Van Hecke, A.</creatorcontrib><title>Compliance with a structured bedside handover protocol: An observational, multicentred study</title><title>International journal of nursing studies</title><addtitle>Int J Nurs Stud</addtitle><description>Bedside handover is the delivery of the nurse-to-nurse shift handover at the patient’s bedside. The method is increasingly used in nursing, but the evidence concerning the implementation process and compliance to the method is limited. To determine the compliance with a structured bedside handover protocol following ISBARR and if there were differences in compliance between wards. A multicentred observational study with unannounced and non-participatory observations (n = 638) one month after the implementation of a structured bedside handover protocol. Observations of individual patient handovers between nurses from the morning shift and the afternoon shift in 12 nursing wards in seven hospitals in Flanders, Belgium. A tailored and structured bedside handover protocol following ISBARR was developed, and nurses were trained accordingly. One month after implementation, a minimum of 50 observations were performed with a checklist, in each participating ward. To enhance reliability, 20% of the observations were conducted by two researchers, and inter-rater agreement was calculated. Data were analysed using descriptive statistics, one-way ANOVAs and multilevel analysis. Average compliance rates to the structured content protocol during bedside handovers were high (83.63%; SD 11.44%), and length of stay, the type of ward and the nursing care model were influencing contextual factors. Items that were most often omitted included identification of the patient (46.27%), the introduction of nurses (36.51%), hand hygiene (35.89%), actively involving the patient (34.44%), and using the call light (21.37%). Items concerning the exchange of clinical information (e.g., test results, reason for admittance, diagnoses) were omitted less (8.09%–1.45%). Absence of the patients (27.29%) and staffing issues (26.70%) accounted for more than half of the non-executed bedside handovers. On average, a bedside handover took 146 s per patient. When the bedside handover was delivered, compliance to the structured content was high, indicating that the execution of a bedside handover is a feasible step for nurses. The compliance rate was influenced by the patient’s length of stay, the nursing care model and the type of ward, but their influence was limited. Future implementation projects on bedside handover should focus sufficiently on standard hospital procedures and patient involvement. According to the nurses, there was however a high number of situations where bedside handovers could not be delivered, perhaps indicating a reluctance in practice to use bedside handovers.</description><subject>Averages</subject><subject>Bedside handover</subject><subject>Clinical information</subject><subject>Compliance</subject><subject>Continuity of care</subject><subject>Handover</subject><subject>Handover duration</subject><subject>Hospitals</subject><subject>Hygiene</subject><subject>Implementation</subject><subject>Intervention compliance</subject><subject>Length of stay</subject><subject>Multilevel analysis</subject><subject>Nurses</subject><subject>Nursing</subject><subject>Nursing care</subject><subject>Observations</subject><subject>Patient participation</subject><subject>Professional identity</subject><subject>Protocol</subject><subject>Reliability</subject><subject>Staffing</subject><issn>0020-7489</issn><issn>1873-491X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkEtr3DAUhUVpaKZp_0IwdNNF7V49bI-6ahj6gkA2KXRRELJ0TWRsa6rHhPz7aJiki266upvvnHv4CLmk0FCg3cepcdOaQ0y5YUC3DYgGKH1BNnTb81pI-usl2QAwqHuxlefkdYwTQCFh-4qcM9kz2bb9hvze-WU_O70arO5duqt0FVPIJuWAthrQRmexutOr9QcM1T745I2fP1VXa-WHiOGgk_Ornj9US56TM7imY7IMsw9vyNmo54hvn-4F-fn1y-3ue3198-3H7uq6Nlx2qeYCZCu4EVJawBGA0x5Fh1JKM9BuBNbKUQByrm2HwDrWt5QzqRnrBguMX5D3p94y70_GmNTiosF51iv6HBUD3jLRSS4K-u4fdPI5lP1HSlLW0lbSQnUnygQfY8BR7YNbdHhQFNTRv5rUs3919K9AqOK_BC-f6vOwoP0bexZegM8nAIuPg8OgonFY7FsX0CRlvfvfj0fDhpoB</recordid><startdate>20180801</startdate><enddate>20180801</enddate><creator>Malfait, S.</creator><creator>Eeckloo, K.</creator><creator>Van Biesen, W.</creator><creator>Deryckere, M.</creator><creator>Lust, E.</creator><creator>Van Hecke, A.</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Elsevier Limited</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QJ</scope><scope>ASE</scope><scope>FPQ</scope><scope>K6X</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2263-0260</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7287-6034</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3576-7159</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20180801</creationdate><title>Compliance with a structured bedside handover protocol: An observational, multicentred study</title><author>Malfait, S. ; Eeckloo, K. ; Van Biesen, W. ; Deryckere, M. ; Lust, E. ; Van Hecke, A.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c396t-3409543c499d0ef00317e46e999cb16f0259f40e33ad6e0262751329a226bd023</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Averages</topic><topic>Bedside handover</topic><topic>Clinical information</topic><topic>Compliance</topic><topic>Continuity of care</topic><topic>Handover</topic><topic>Handover duration</topic><topic>Hospitals</topic><topic>Hygiene</topic><topic>Implementation</topic><topic>Intervention compliance</topic><topic>Length of stay</topic><topic>Multilevel analysis</topic><topic>Nurses</topic><topic>Nursing</topic><topic>Nursing care</topic><topic>Observations</topic><topic>Patient participation</topic><topic>Professional identity</topic><topic>Protocol</topic><topic>Reliability</topic><topic>Staffing</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Malfait, S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Eeckloo, K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Van Biesen, W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Deryckere, M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lust, E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Van Hecke, A.</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index &amp; Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><collection>British Nursing Index</collection><collection>British Nursing Index (BNI) (1985 to Present)</collection><collection>British Nursing Index</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>International journal of nursing studies</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Malfait, S.</au><au>Eeckloo, K.</au><au>Van Biesen, W.</au><au>Deryckere, M.</au><au>Lust, E.</au><au>Van Hecke, A.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Compliance with a structured bedside handover protocol: An observational, multicentred study</atitle><jtitle>International journal of nursing studies</jtitle><addtitle>Int J Nurs Stud</addtitle><date>2018-08-01</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>84</volume><spage>12</spage><epage>18</epage><pages>12-18</pages><issn>0020-7489</issn><eissn>1873-491X</eissn><abstract>Bedside handover is the delivery of the nurse-to-nurse shift handover at the patient’s bedside. The method is increasingly used in nursing, but the evidence concerning the implementation process and compliance to the method is limited. To determine the compliance with a structured bedside handover protocol following ISBARR and if there were differences in compliance between wards. A multicentred observational study with unannounced and non-participatory observations (n = 638) one month after the implementation of a structured bedside handover protocol. Observations of individual patient handovers between nurses from the morning shift and the afternoon shift in 12 nursing wards in seven hospitals in Flanders, Belgium. A tailored and structured bedside handover protocol following ISBARR was developed, and nurses were trained accordingly. One month after implementation, a minimum of 50 observations were performed with a checklist, in each participating ward. To enhance reliability, 20% of the observations were conducted by two researchers, and inter-rater agreement was calculated. Data were analysed using descriptive statistics, one-way ANOVAs and multilevel analysis. Average compliance rates to the structured content protocol during bedside handovers were high (83.63%; SD 11.44%), and length of stay, the type of ward and the nursing care model were influencing contextual factors. Items that were most often omitted included identification of the patient (46.27%), the introduction of nurses (36.51%), hand hygiene (35.89%), actively involving the patient (34.44%), and using the call light (21.37%). Items concerning the exchange of clinical information (e.g., test results, reason for admittance, diagnoses) were omitted less (8.09%–1.45%). Absence of the patients (27.29%) and staffing issues (26.70%) accounted for more than half of the non-executed bedside handovers. On average, a bedside handover took 146 s per patient. When the bedside handover was delivered, compliance to the structured content was high, indicating that the execution of a bedside handover is a feasible step for nurses. The compliance rate was influenced by the patient’s length of stay, the nursing care model and the type of ward, but their influence was limited. Future implementation projects on bedside handover should focus sufficiently on standard hospital procedures and patient involvement. According to the nurses, there was however a high number of situations where bedside handovers could not be delivered, perhaps indicating a reluctance in practice to use bedside handovers.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>29729557</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2018.04.011</doi><tpages>7</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2263-0260</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7287-6034</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3576-7159</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0020-7489
ispartof International journal of nursing studies, 2018-08, Vol.84, p.12-18
issn 0020-7489
1873-491X
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2035246934
source Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete; Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)
subjects Averages
Bedside handover
Clinical information
Compliance
Continuity of care
Handover
Handover duration
Hospitals
Hygiene
Implementation
Intervention compliance
Length of stay
Multilevel analysis
Nurses
Nursing
Nursing care
Observations
Patient participation
Professional identity
Protocol
Reliability
Staffing
title Compliance with a structured bedside handover protocol: An observational, multicentred study
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-04T05%3A19%3A40IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Compliance%20with%20a%20structured%20bedside%20handover%20protocol:%20An%20observational,%20multicentred%20study&rft.jtitle=International%20journal%20of%20nursing%20studies&rft.au=Malfait,%20S.&rft.date=2018-08-01&rft.volume=84&rft.spage=12&rft.epage=18&rft.pages=12-18&rft.issn=0020-7489&rft.eissn=1873-491X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2018.04.011&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2091251591%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2091251591&rft_id=info:pmid/29729557&rft_els_id=S0020748918300968&rfr_iscdi=true