Effects of prefrontal tDCS on executive function: Methodological considerations revealed by meta-analysis

A meta-analysis of studies using single-session transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) to target the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) was undertaken to examine the effect of stimulation on executive function (EF) in healthy samples. 27 studies were included in analyses, yielding 71 eff...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Neuropsychologia 2018-08, Vol.117, p.156-166
Hauptverfasser: Imburgio, Michael J., Orr, Joseph M.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 166
container_issue
container_start_page 156
container_title Neuropsychologia
container_volume 117
creator Imburgio, Michael J.
Orr, Joseph M.
description A meta-analysis of studies using single-session transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) to target the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) was undertaken to examine the effect of stimulation on executive function (EF) in healthy samples. 27 studies were included in analyses, yielding 71 effect sizes. The most relevant measure for each task was determined a priori and used to calculate Hedge's g. Methodological characteristics of each study were examined individually as potential moderators of effect size. Stimulation effects on three domains of EF (inhibition of prepotent responses, mental set shifting, and information updating and monitoring) were analyzed separately. In line with previous work, the current study found no significant effect of anodal unilateral tDCS, cathodal unilateral tDCS, or bilateral tDCS on EF. Further moderator and subgroup analyses were only carried out for anodal unilateral montages due to the small number of studies using other montages. Subgroup analyses revealed a significant effect of anodal unilateral tDCS on updating tasks, but not on inhibition or set-shifting tasks. Cathode location significantly moderated the effect of anodal unilateral tDCS. Extracranial cathodes yielded a significant effect on EF while cranial cathodes yielded no effect. Anode size also significantly moderated effect of anodal unilateral tDCS, with smaller anodes being more effective than larger anodes. In summary, anodal DLPFC stimulation is more effective at improving updating ability than inhibition and set-shifting ability, but anodal stimulation can significantly improve general executive function when extracranial cathodes or small anodes are used. Future meta-analyses may examine how stimulation's effects on specific behavioral tasks, rather than broader domains, might be affected by methodological moderators. •Anodal DLPFC tDCS increased performance on updating tasks.•Anodal DLPFC tDCS increased global EF performance when anodes were smaller than 25 cm2.•Anodal DLPFC tDCS increased global EF performance when extracranial cathodes were used.•Overall, DLPFC tDCS did not affect global EF performance.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2018.04.022
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2035244541</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0028393218301623</els_id><sourcerecordid>2035244541</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c514t-f1a2074113d50e80edb430e45a7cee4252a98aca43e4c6ed493b4e257e53b3c3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkE1vEzEQhi1ERdPCX0A-IS67jL-yGw5IKLS0UisO9G557VnqaGMH2xuRf49DCgdOPc1hnpl35iHkHYOWAVt-2LQB5xR3-WAf4xR_eNNyYH0LsgXOX5AF6zvRCMXkS7IA4H0jVoKfk4ucNwAgFe9fkXO-6ni35MsF8VfjiLZkGke6SzimGIqZaPmy_k5joPgL7Vz8Huk4B1t8DB_pPZbH6P6E24raGLJ3mMyxm2nCPZoJHR0OdIvFNCaY6ZB9fk3ORjNlfPNUL8nD9dXD-qa5-_b1dv35rrH16NKMzHDoJGPCKcAe0A1SAEplOosoueJm1RtrpEBpl-jkSgwSuepQiUFYcUnen9buUvw5Yy5667PFaTIB45w1B6G4lEqyin46oTbFnOvzepf81qSDZqCPtvVG_29bH21rkLrargvePmXNwxbdv_G_eitwcwKwPrz3mHS2HoNF51O1rl30z836DScKnes</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2035244541</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Effects of prefrontal tDCS on executive function: Methodological considerations revealed by meta-analysis</title><source>Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)</source><creator>Imburgio, Michael J. ; Orr, Joseph M.</creator><creatorcontrib>Imburgio, Michael J. ; Orr, Joseph M.</creatorcontrib><description>A meta-analysis of studies using single-session transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) to target the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) was undertaken to examine the effect of stimulation on executive function (EF) in healthy samples. 27 studies were included in analyses, yielding 71 effect sizes. The most relevant measure for each task was determined a priori and used to calculate Hedge's g. Methodological characteristics of each study were examined individually as potential moderators of effect size. Stimulation effects on three domains of EF (inhibition of prepotent responses, mental set shifting, and information updating and monitoring) were analyzed separately. In line with previous work, the current study found no significant effect of anodal unilateral tDCS, cathodal unilateral tDCS, or bilateral tDCS on EF. Further moderator and subgroup analyses were only carried out for anodal unilateral montages due to the small number of studies using other montages. Subgroup analyses revealed a significant effect of anodal unilateral tDCS on updating tasks, but not on inhibition or set-shifting tasks. Cathode location significantly moderated the effect of anodal unilateral tDCS. Extracranial cathodes yielded a significant effect on EF while cranial cathodes yielded no effect. Anode size also significantly moderated effect of anodal unilateral tDCS, with smaller anodes being more effective than larger anodes. In summary, anodal DLPFC stimulation is more effective at improving updating ability than inhibition and set-shifting ability, but anodal stimulation can significantly improve general executive function when extracranial cathodes or small anodes are used. Future meta-analyses may examine how stimulation's effects on specific behavioral tasks, rather than broader domains, might be affected by methodological moderators. •Anodal DLPFC tDCS increased performance on updating tasks.•Anodal DLPFC tDCS increased global EF performance when anodes were smaller than 25 cm2.•Anodal DLPFC tDCS increased global EF performance when extracranial cathodes were used.•Overall, DLPFC tDCS did not affect global EF performance.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0028-3932</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-3514</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2018.04.022</identifier><identifier>PMID: 29727626</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>DLPFC ; Executive Function ; Meta-analysis ; TDCS</subject><ispartof>Neuropsychologia, 2018-08, Vol.117, p.156-166</ispartof><rights>2018 Elsevier Ltd</rights><rights>Copyright © 2018 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c514t-f1a2074113d50e80edb430e45a7cee4252a98aca43e4c6ed493b4e257e53b3c3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c514t-f1a2074113d50e80edb430e45a7cee4252a98aca43e4c6ed493b4e257e53b3c3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2018.04.022$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3550,27924,27925,45995</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29727626$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Imburgio, Michael J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Orr, Joseph M.</creatorcontrib><title>Effects of prefrontal tDCS on executive function: Methodological considerations revealed by meta-analysis</title><title>Neuropsychologia</title><addtitle>Neuropsychologia</addtitle><description>A meta-analysis of studies using single-session transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) to target the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) was undertaken to examine the effect of stimulation on executive function (EF) in healthy samples. 27 studies were included in analyses, yielding 71 effect sizes. The most relevant measure for each task was determined a priori and used to calculate Hedge's g. Methodological characteristics of each study were examined individually as potential moderators of effect size. Stimulation effects on three domains of EF (inhibition of prepotent responses, mental set shifting, and information updating and monitoring) were analyzed separately. In line with previous work, the current study found no significant effect of anodal unilateral tDCS, cathodal unilateral tDCS, or bilateral tDCS on EF. Further moderator and subgroup analyses were only carried out for anodal unilateral montages due to the small number of studies using other montages. Subgroup analyses revealed a significant effect of anodal unilateral tDCS on updating tasks, but not on inhibition or set-shifting tasks. Cathode location significantly moderated the effect of anodal unilateral tDCS. Extracranial cathodes yielded a significant effect on EF while cranial cathodes yielded no effect. Anode size also significantly moderated effect of anodal unilateral tDCS, with smaller anodes being more effective than larger anodes. In summary, anodal DLPFC stimulation is more effective at improving updating ability than inhibition and set-shifting ability, but anodal stimulation can significantly improve general executive function when extracranial cathodes or small anodes are used. Future meta-analyses may examine how stimulation's effects on specific behavioral tasks, rather than broader domains, might be affected by methodological moderators. •Anodal DLPFC tDCS increased performance on updating tasks.•Anodal DLPFC tDCS increased global EF performance when anodes were smaller than 25 cm2.•Anodal DLPFC tDCS increased global EF performance when extracranial cathodes were used.•Overall, DLPFC tDCS did not affect global EF performance.</description><subject>DLPFC</subject><subject>Executive Function</subject><subject>Meta-analysis</subject><subject>TDCS</subject><issn>0028-3932</issn><issn>1873-3514</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqNkE1vEzEQhi1ERdPCX0A-IS67jL-yGw5IKLS0UisO9G557VnqaGMH2xuRf49DCgdOPc1hnpl35iHkHYOWAVt-2LQB5xR3-WAf4xR_eNNyYH0LsgXOX5AF6zvRCMXkS7IA4H0jVoKfk4ucNwAgFe9fkXO-6ni35MsF8VfjiLZkGke6SzimGIqZaPmy_k5joPgL7Vz8Huk4B1t8DB_pPZbH6P6E24raGLJ3mMyxm2nCPZoJHR0OdIvFNCaY6ZB9fk3ORjNlfPNUL8nD9dXD-qa5-_b1dv35rrH16NKMzHDoJGPCKcAe0A1SAEplOosoueJm1RtrpEBpl-jkSgwSuepQiUFYcUnen9buUvw5Yy5667PFaTIB45w1B6G4lEqyin46oTbFnOvzepf81qSDZqCPtvVG_29bH21rkLrargvePmXNwxbdv_G_eitwcwKwPrz3mHS2HoNF51O1rl30z836DScKnes</recordid><startdate>201808</startdate><enddate>201808</enddate><creator>Imburgio, Michael J.</creator><creator>Orr, Joseph M.</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201808</creationdate><title>Effects of prefrontal tDCS on executive function: Methodological considerations revealed by meta-analysis</title><author>Imburgio, Michael J. ; Orr, Joseph M.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c514t-f1a2074113d50e80edb430e45a7cee4252a98aca43e4c6ed493b4e257e53b3c3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>DLPFC</topic><topic>Executive Function</topic><topic>Meta-analysis</topic><topic>TDCS</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Imburgio, Michael J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Orr, Joseph M.</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Neuropsychologia</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Imburgio, Michael J.</au><au>Orr, Joseph M.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Effects of prefrontal tDCS on executive function: Methodological considerations revealed by meta-analysis</atitle><jtitle>Neuropsychologia</jtitle><addtitle>Neuropsychologia</addtitle><date>2018-08</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>117</volume><spage>156</spage><epage>166</epage><pages>156-166</pages><issn>0028-3932</issn><eissn>1873-3514</eissn><abstract>A meta-analysis of studies using single-session transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) to target the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) was undertaken to examine the effect of stimulation on executive function (EF) in healthy samples. 27 studies were included in analyses, yielding 71 effect sizes. The most relevant measure for each task was determined a priori and used to calculate Hedge's g. Methodological characteristics of each study were examined individually as potential moderators of effect size. Stimulation effects on three domains of EF (inhibition of prepotent responses, mental set shifting, and information updating and monitoring) were analyzed separately. In line with previous work, the current study found no significant effect of anodal unilateral tDCS, cathodal unilateral tDCS, or bilateral tDCS on EF. Further moderator and subgroup analyses were only carried out for anodal unilateral montages due to the small number of studies using other montages. Subgroup analyses revealed a significant effect of anodal unilateral tDCS on updating tasks, but not on inhibition or set-shifting tasks. Cathode location significantly moderated the effect of anodal unilateral tDCS. Extracranial cathodes yielded a significant effect on EF while cranial cathodes yielded no effect. Anode size also significantly moderated effect of anodal unilateral tDCS, with smaller anodes being more effective than larger anodes. In summary, anodal DLPFC stimulation is more effective at improving updating ability than inhibition and set-shifting ability, but anodal stimulation can significantly improve general executive function when extracranial cathodes or small anodes are used. Future meta-analyses may examine how stimulation's effects on specific behavioral tasks, rather than broader domains, might be affected by methodological moderators. •Anodal DLPFC tDCS increased performance on updating tasks.•Anodal DLPFC tDCS increased global EF performance when anodes were smaller than 25 cm2.•Anodal DLPFC tDCS increased global EF performance when extracranial cathodes were used.•Overall, DLPFC tDCS did not affect global EF performance.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>29727626</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2018.04.022</doi><tpages>11</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0028-3932
ispartof Neuropsychologia, 2018-08, Vol.117, p.156-166
issn 0028-3932
1873-3514
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2035244541
source Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)
subjects DLPFC
Executive Function
Meta-analysis
TDCS
title Effects of prefrontal tDCS on executive function: Methodological considerations revealed by meta-analysis
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-28T22%3A43%3A45IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Effects%20of%20prefrontal%20tDCS%20on%20executive%20function:%20Methodological%20considerations%20revealed%20by%20meta-analysis&rft.jtitle=Neuropsychologia&rft.au=Imburgio,%20Michael%20J.&rft.date=2018-08&rft.volume=117&rft.spage=156&rft.epage=166&rft.pages=156-166&rft.issn=0028-3932&rft.eissn=1873-3514&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2018.04.022&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2035244541%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2035244541&rft_id=info:pmid/29727626&rft_els_id=S0028393218301623&rfr_iscdi=true