Improved detection using negative elevation angles for mountaintop WSR-88Ds. Part III Simulations of shallow convective activity over and around lake ontario

During the winter, lake-effect snowstorms that form over Lake Ontario represent a significant weather hazard for the populace around the lake. These storms, which typically are only 2 km deep, frequently can produce narrow swaths (20–50 km wide) of heavy snowfall (2–5 cm h−1 or more) that extend 50–...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Weather and forecasting 2007-08, Vol.22 (4), p.839-852
Hauptverfasser: BROWN, Rodger A, NIZIOL, Thomas A, DONALDSON, Norman R, JOE, Paul I, WOOD, Vincent T
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 852
container_issue 4
container_start_page 839
container_title Weather and forecasting
container_volume 22
creator BROWN, Rodger A
NIZIOL, Thomas A
DONALDSON, Norman R
JOE, Paul I
WOOD, Vincent T
description During the winter, lake-effect snowstorms that form over Lake Ontario represent a significant weather hazard for the populace around the lake. These storms, which typically are only 2 km deep, frequently can produce narrow swaths (20–50 km wide) of heavy snowfall (2–5 cm h−1 or more) that extend 50–75 km inland over populated areas. Subtle changes in the low-altitude flow direction can mean the difference between accumulations that last for 1–2 h and accumulations that last 24 h or more at a given location. Therefore, it is vital that radars surrounding the lake are able to detect the presence and strength of these shallow storms. Starting in 2002, the Canadian operational radars on the northern side of the lake at King City, Ontario, and Franktown, Ontario, began using elevation angles of as low as −0.1° and 0.0°, respectively, during the winter to more accurately estimate snowfall rates at the surface. Meanwhile, Weather Surveillance Radars-1988 Doppler in New York State on the southern and eastern sides of the lake—Buffalo (KBUF), Binghamton (KBGM), and Montague (KTYX)—all operate at 0.5° and above. KTYX is located on a plateau that overlooks the lake from the east at a height of 0.5 km. With its upward-pointing radar beams, KTYX’s detection of shallow lake-effect snowstorms is limited to the eastern quarter of the lake and surrounding terrain. The purpose of this paper is to show—through simulations—the dramatic increase in snowstorm coverage that would be possible if KTYX were able to scan downward toward the lake’s surface. Furthermore, if KBUF and KBGM were to scan as low as 0.2°, detection of at least the upper portions of lake-effect storms over Lake Ontario and all of the surrounding land area by the five radars would be complete. Overlake coverage in the lower half (0–1 km) of the typical lake-effect snowstorm would increase from about 40% to about 85%, resulting in better estimates of snowfall rates in landfalling snowbands over a much broader area.
doi_str_mv 10.1175/WAF1019.1
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_20349954</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1326666431</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c352t-2b4c6bdd1e551f2abf8800dd6feb7a8df5e4edc5284a0677a658853c573e79213</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdkU9v1DAQxSMEEkvhwDewkEDqIYv_xIlzrAqFSJWoWlCP0aw9WVwce7Gdrfph-K5425WQOM1h3vu90byqesvomrFOfrw9u2CU9Wv2rFoxyWlNG9E8r1ZUKV4rJtuX1auU7iilXPJ-Vf0Z5l0MezTEYEadbfBkSdZvicctZLtHgg738LgAv3WYyBQimcPiM1ifw47c3lzXSn1Ka3IFMZNhGMiNnRf3aEokTCT9BOfCPdHB7w8hhQqHYfMDKeGxkA2BWJiGOPiFJBR4tOF19WICl_DNcZ5UPy4-fz__Wl9--zKcn13WWkiea75pdLsxhqGUbOKwmZSi1Jh2wk0HykwSGzRactUAbbsOWqmUFFp2ArueM3FSfXjill_8XjDlcbZJo3PgMSxp5FQ0fS-bInz3n_AuLNGX20bWt0JIKfoiOn0S6RhSijiNu2hniA8jo-OhpfHY0nhIfn8EQtLgpghe2_TP0JeeqKTiL2Kkk_Q</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>196335539</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Improved detection using negative elevation angles for mountaintop WSR-88Ds. Part III Simulations of shallow convective activity over and around lake ontario</title><source>Free E-Journal (出版社公開部分のみ)</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><source>AMS Journals (Meteorology)</source><creator>BROWN, Rodger A ; NIZIOL, Thomas A ; DONALDSON, Norman R ; JOE, Paul I ; WOOD, Vincent T</creator><creatorcontrib>BROWN, Rodger A ; NIZIOL, Thomas A ; DONALDSON, Norman R ; JOE, Paul I ; WOOD, Vincent T</creatorcontrib><description>During the winter, lake-effect snowstorms that form over Lake Ontario represent a significant weather hazard for the populace around the lake. These storms, which typically are only 2 km deep, frequently can produce narrow swaths (20–50 km wide) of heavy snowfall (2–5 cm h−1 or more) that extend 50–75 km inland over populated areas. Subtle changes in the low-altitude flow direction can mean the difference between accumulations that last for 1–2 h and accumulations that last 24 h or more at a given location. Therefore, it is vital that radars surrounding the lake are able to detect the presence and strength of these shallow storms. Starting in 2002, the Canadian operational radars on the northern side of the lake at King City, Ontario, and Franktown, Ontario, began using elevation angles of as low as −0.1° and 0.0°, respectively, during the winter to more accurately estimate snowfall rates at the surface. Meanwhile, Weather Surveillance Radars-1988 Doppler in New York State on the southern and eastern sides of the lake—Buffalo (KBUF), Binghamton (KBGM), and Montague (KTYX)—all operate at 0.5° and above. KTYX is located on a plateau that overlooks the lake from the east at a height of 0.5 km. With its upward-pointing radar beams, KTYX’s detection of shallow lake-effect snowstorms is limited to the eastern quarter of the lake and surrounding terrain. The purpose of this paper is to show—through simulations—the dramatic increase in snowstorm coverage that would be possible if KTYX were able to scan downward toward the lake’s surface. Furthermore, if KBUF and KBGM were to scan as low as 0.2°, detection of at least the upper portions of lake-effect storms over Lake Ontario and all of the surrounding land area by the five radars would be complete. Overlake coverage in the lower half (0–1 km) of the typical lake-effect snowstorm would increase from about 40% to about 85%, resulting in better estimates of snowfall rates in landfalling snowbands over a much broader area.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0882-8156</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1520-0434</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1175/WAF1019.1</identifier><identifier>CODEN: WEFOE3</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Boston, MA: American Meteorological Society</publisher><subject>Doppler radar ; Earth, ocean, space ; Elevation ; Exact sciences and technology ; External geophysics ; Lakes ; Meteorology ; Outdoor activities ; States ; Storms ; Weather analysis and prediction ; Weather hazards ; Winter</subject><ispartof>Weather and forecasting, 2007-08, Vol.22 (4), p.839-852</ispartof><rights>2007 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright American Meteorological Society Aug 2007</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c352t-2b4c6bdd1e551f2abf8800dd6feb7a8df5e4edc5284a0677a658853c573e79213</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c352t-2b4c6bdd1e551f2abf8800dd6feb7a8df5e4edc5284a0677a658853c573e79213</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3679,27922,27923</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=19025050$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>BROWN, Rodger A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>NIZIOL, Thomas A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>DONALDSON, Norman R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>JOE, Paul I</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>WOOD, Vincent T</creatorcontrib><title>Improved detection using negative elevation angles for mountaintop WSR-88Ds. Part III Simulations of shallow convective activity over and around lake ontario</title><title>Weather and forecasting</title><description>During the winter, lake-effect snowstorms that form over Lake Ontario represent a significant weather hazard for the populace around the lake. These storms, which typically are only 2 km deep, frequently can produce narrow swaths (20–50 km wide) of heavy snowfall (2–5 cm h−1 or more) that extend 50–75 km inland over populated areas. Subtle changes in the low-altitude flow direction can mean the difference between accumulations that last for 1–2 h and accumulations that last 24 h or more at a given location. Therefore, it is vital that radars surrounding the lake are able to detect the presence and strength of these shallow storms. Starting in 2002, the Canadian operational radars on the northern side of the lake at King City, Ontario, and Franktown, Ontario, began using elevation angles of as low as −0.1° and 0.0°, respectively, during the winter to more accurately estimate snowfall rates at the surface. Meanwhile, Weather Surveillance Radars-1988 Doppler in New York State on the southern and eastern sides of the lake—Buffalo (KBUF), Binghamton (KBGM), and Montague (KTYX)—all operate at 0.5° and above. KTYX is located on a plateau that overlooks the lake from the east at a height of 0.5 km. With its upward-pointing radar beams, KTYX’s detection of shallow lake-effect snowstorms is limited to the eastern quarter of the lake and surrounding terrain. The purpose of this paper is to show—through simulations—the dramatic increase in snowstorm coverage that would be possible if KTYX were able to scan downward toward the lake’s surface. Furthermore, if KBUF and KBGM were to scan as low as 0.2°, detection of at least the upper portions of lake-effect storms over Lake Ontario and all of the surrounding land area by the five radars would be complete. Overlake coverage in the lower half (0–1 km) of the typical lake-effect snowstorm would increase from about 40% to about 85%, resulting in better estimates of snowfall rates in landfalling snowbands over a much broader area.</description><subject>Doppler radar</subject><subject>Earth, ocean, space</subject><subject>Elevation</subject><subject>Exact sciences and technology</subject><subject>External geophysics</subject><subject>Lakes</subject><subject>Meteorology</subject><subject>Outdoor activities</subject><subject>States</subject><subject>Storms</subject><subject>Weather analysis and prediction</subject><subject>Weather hazards</subject><subject>Winter</subject><issn>0882-8156</issn><issn>1520-0434</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2007</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNpdkU9v1DAQxSMEEkvhwDewkEDqIYv_xIlzrAqFSJWoWlCP0aw9WVwce7Gdrfph-K5425WQOM1h3vu90byqesvomrFOfrw9u2CU9Wv2rFoxyWlNG9E8r1ZUKV4rJtuX1auU7iilXPJ-Vf0Z5l0MezTEYEadbfBkSdZvicctZLtHgg738LgAv3WYyBQimcPiM1ifw47c3lzXSn1Ka3IFMZNhGMiNnRf3aEokTCT9BOfCPdHB7w8hhQqHYfMDKeGxkA2BWJiGOPiFJBR4tOF19WICl_DNcZ5UPy4-fz__Wl9--zKcn13WWkiea75pdLsxhqGUbOKwmZSi1Jh2wk0HykwSGzRactUAbbsOWqmUFFp2ArueM3FSfXjill_8XjDlcbZJo3PgMSxp5FQ0fS-bInz3n_AuLNGX20bWt0JIKfoiOn0S6RhSijiNu2hniA8jo-OhpfHY0nhIfn8EQtLgpghe2_TP0JeeqKTiL2Kkk_Q</recordid><startdate>20070801</startdate><enddate>20070801</enddate><creator>BROWN, Rodger A</creator><creator>NIZIOL, Thomas A</creator><creator>DONALDSON, Norman R</creator><creator>JOE, Paul I</creator><creator>WOOD, Vincent T</creator><general>American Meteorological Society</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QH</scope><scope>7RQ</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7TN</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88F</scope><scope>8AF</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>BKSAR</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>H96</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>M1Q</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PCBAR</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>S0X</scope><scope>U9A</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20070801</creationdate><title>Improved detection using negative elevation angles for mountaintop WSR-88Ds. Part III Simulations of shallow convective activity over and around lake ontario</title><author>BROWN, Rodger A ; NIZIOL, Thomas A ; DONALDSON, Norman R ; JOE, Paul I ; WOOD, Vincent T</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c352t-2b4c6bdd1e551f2abf8800dd6feb7a8df5e4edc5284a0677a658853c573e79213</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2007</creationdate><topic>Doppler radar</topic><topic>Earth, ocean, space</topic><topic>Elevation</topic><topic>Exact sciences and technology</topic><topic>External geophysics</topic><topic>Lakes</topic><topic>Meteorology</topic><topic>Outdoor activities</topic><topic>States</topic><topic>Storms</topic><topic>Weather analysis and prediction</topic><topic>Weather hazards</topic><topic>Winter</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>BROWN, Rodger A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>NIZIOL, Thomas A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>DONALDSON, Norman R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>JOE, Paul I</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>WOOD, Vincent T</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Aqualine</collection><collection>ProQuest Career &amp; Technical Education Database</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Oceanic Abstracts</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Military Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>STEM Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural &amp; Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>eLibrary</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric &amp; Aquatic Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 2: Ocean Technology, Policy &amp; Non-Living Resources</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>ProQuest Military Database</collection><collection>ProQuest research library</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric &amp; Aquatic Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>SIRS Editorial</collection><jtitle>Weather and forecasting</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>BROWN, Rodger A</au><au>NIZIOL, Thomas A</au><au>DONALDSON, Norman R</au><au>JOE, Paul I</au><au>WOOD, Vincent T</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Improved detection using negative elevation angles for mountaintop WSR-88Ds. Part III Simulations of shallow convective activity over and around lake ontario</atitle><jtitle>Weather and forecasting</jtitle><date>2007-08-01</date><risdate>2007</risdate><volume>22</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>839</spage><epage>852</epage><pages>839-852</pages><issn>0882-8156</issn><eissn>1520-0434</eissn><coden>WEFOE3</coden><abstract>During the winter, lake-effect snowstorms that form over Lake Ontario represent a significant weather hazard for the populace around the lake. These storms, which typically are only 2 km deep, frequently can produce narrow swaths (20–50 km wide) of heavy snowfall (2–5 cm h−1 or more) that extend 50–75 km inland over populated areas. Subtle changes in the low-altitude flow direction can mean the difference between accumulations that last for 1–2 h and accumulations that last 24 h or more at a given location. Therefore, it is vital that radars surrounding the lake are able to detect the presence and strength of these shallow storms. Starting in 2002, the Canadian operational radars on the northern side of the lake at King City, Ontario, and Franktown, Ontario, began using elevation angles of as low as −0.1° and 0.0°, respectively, during the winter to more accurately estimate snowfall rates at the surface. Meanwhile, Weather Surveillance Radars-1988 Doppler in New York State on the southern and eastern sides of the lake—Buffalo (KBUF), Binghamton (KBGM), and Montague (KTYX)—all operate at 0.5° and above. KTYX is located on a plateau that overlooks the lake from the east at a height of 0.5 km. With its upward-pointing radar beams, KTYX’s detection of shallow lake-effect snowstorms is limited to the eastern quarter of the lake and surrounding terrain. The purpose of this paper is to show—through simulations—the dramatic increase in snowstorm coverage that would be possible if KTYX were able to scan downward toward the lake’s surface. Furthermore, if KBUF and KBGM were to scan as low as 0.2°, detection of at least the upper portions of lake-effect storms over Lake Ontario and all of the surrounding land area by the five radars would be complete. Overlake coverage in the lower half (0–1 km) of the typical lake-effect snowstorm would increase from about 40% to about 85%, resulting in better estimates of snowfall rates in landfalling snowbands over a much broader area.</abstract><cop>Boston, MA</cop><pub>American Meteorological Society</pub><doi>10.1175/WAF1019.1</doi><tpages>14</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0882-8156
ispartof Weather and forecasting, 2007-08, Vol.22 (4), p.839-852
issn 0882-8156
1520-0434
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_20349954
source Free E-Journal (出版社公開部分のみ); Alma/SFX Local Collection; AMS Journals (Meteorology)
subjects Doppler radar
Earth, ocean, space
Elevation
Exact sciences and technology
External geophysics
Lakes
Meteorology
Outdoor activities
States
Storms
Weather analysis and prediction
Weather hazards
Winter
title Improved detection using negative elevation angles for mountaintop WSR-88Ds. Part III Simulations of shallow convective activity over and around lake ontario
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-14T14%3A46%3A49IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Improved%20detection%20using%20negative%20elevation%20angles%20for%20mountaintop%20WSR-88Ds.%20Part%20III%20Simulations%20of%20shallow%20convective%20activity%20over%20and%20around%20lake%20ontario&rft.jtitle=Weather%20and%20forecasting&rft.au=BROWN,%20Rodger%20A&rft.date=2007-08-01&rft.volume=22&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=839&rft.epage=852&rft.pages=839-852&rft.issn=0882-8156&rft.eissn=1520-0434&rft.coden=WEFOE3&rft_id=info:doi/10.1175/WAF1019.1&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1326666431%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=196335539&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true