Inbreeding levels and prey abundance interact to determine fecundity in natural populations of two species of wolf spider
Long-term effective population size is expected, and has been shown, to correlate positively with various measures of population fitness. Here we examine the interacting effects of population size (as a surrogate for genetic factors) and prey consumption rates (as a surrogate for environmental quali...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Conservation genetics 2007-09, Vol.8 (5), p.1061-1071 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 1071 |
---|---|
container_issue | 5 |
container_start_page | 1061 |
container_title | Conservation genetics |
container_volume | 8 |
creator | Reed, David H Nicholas, Amy C Stratton, Gail E |
description | Long-term effective population size is expected, and has been shown, to correlate positively with various measures of population fitness. Here we examine the interacting effects of population size (as a surrogate for genetic factors) and prey consumption rates (as a surrogate for environmental quality) on fecundity in two sympatric species of wolf spider, Rabidosa punctulata and Rabidosa rabida. Population size was estimated in each of seven genetically isolated populations in each of 3 years using mark-recapture methods. Fecundity was estimated as the mean number of live offspring produced by ~15 females sampled from each population of each species each year for 3 years. Prey consumption rates were estimated by sampling ~300 spiders per population per year and assaying the proportion of spiders with prey. Larger populations have higher fecundity and more genetic diversity than smaller populations. Variation among populations in fecundity for a given year could be attributed most strongly to differences in population size, with variation in prey consumption rates and the interaction between population size and prey consumption playing smaller but still important roles. During the most stressful environmental conditions, the smallest populations of both species experienced disproportionately low-fecundity rates, more than doubling the estimated number of lethal equivalents during those years. The evidence presented in this paper for inbreeding-environment interactions at the population level and further evidence for a log-linear relationship between population size and fitness have important implications for conservation. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s10592-006-9260-4 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_20345279</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2145928351</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c327t-b2c2adbc637cf5caee298116592a127f985ae343c172ac23305ef044922329923</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdkcFu2zAMQI1iBZql_YCeJuywmzuJsq3oOBTrViBAD2vPAiNThQJH8iR5Rf6-yrLTTiTBR4LEa5pbwe8E5-prFrzX0HI-tBoG3nYXzUr0ClqtpPpwyoeh5QOIq-ZjznvOxQBKrJrjY9glotGHVzbRH5oywzCyOdGR4W4JIwZLzIdCCW1hJbKRan7wgZgjWwFfjrXPApYl4cTmOC8TFh9DZtGx8hZZnsl6-lu-xcnV2o-UrptLh1Omm39x3bw8fH--_9lun3483n_btlaCKu0OLOC4s4NU1vUWiUBvhBjqtyhAOb3pkWQnrVCAFqTkPTnedRpAgtYg182X8945xd8L5WIOPluaJgwUl2yAy64HpSv4-T9wH5cU6m1G9VJ3Qm1UhcQZsinmnMiZOfkDpqMR3JxMmLMJU02YkwnT1ZlP5xmH0eBr8tm8_AIuZMU1VEHyHVzshiY</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>753941787</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Inbreeding levels and prey abundance interact to determine fecundity in natural populations of two species of wolf spider</title><source>SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings</source><creator>Reed, David H ; Nicholas, Amy C ; Stratton, Gail E</creator><creatorcontrib>Reed, David H ; Nicholas, Amy C ; Stratton, Gail E</creatorcontrib><description>Long-term effective population size is expected, and has been shown, to correlate positively with various measures of population fitness. Here we examine the interacting effects of population size (as a surrogate for genetic factors) and prey consumption rates (as a surrogate for environmental quality) on fecundity in two sympatric species of wolf spider, Rabidosa punctulata and Rabidosa rabida. Population size was estimated in each of seven genetically isolated populations in each of 3 years using mark-recapture methods. Fecundity was estimated as the mean number of live offspring produced by ~15 females sampled from each population of each species each year for 3 years. Prey consumption rates were estimated by sampling ~300 spiders per population per year and assaying the proportion of spiders with prey. Larger populations have higher fecundity and more genetic diversity than smaller populations. Variation among populations in fecundity for a given year could be attributed most strongly to differences in population size, with variation in prey consumption rates and the interaction between population size and prey consumption playing smaller but still important roles. During the most stressful environmental conditions, the smallest populations of both species experienced disproportionately low-fecundity rates, more than doubling the estimated number of lethal equivalents during those years. The evidence presented in this paper for inbreeding-environment interactions at the population level and further evidence for a log-linear relationship between population size and fitness have important implications for conservation.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1566-0621</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1572-9737</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s10592-006-9260-4</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Dordrecht: Dordrecht : Kluwer Academic Publishers</publisher><subject>Araneae ; Environmental conditions ; Environmental quality ; extinction ; Fecundity ; Fitness ; Genetic diversity ; Genetic factors ; Genetic stochasticity ; genetic variation ; Inbreeding ; Lycosidae ; Natural populations ; Offspring ; Population number ; population size ; Prey ; Prey consumption ; Spiders</subject><ispartof>Conservation genetics, 2007-09, Vol.8 (5), p.1061-1071</ispartof><rights>Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2007</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c327t-b2c2adbc637cf5caee298116592a127f985ae343c172ac23305ef044922329923</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c327t-b2c2adbc637cf5caee298116592a127f985ae343c172ac23305ef044922329923</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Reed, David H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nicholas, Amy C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stratton, Gail E</creatorcontrib><title>Inbreeding levels and prey abundance interact to determine fecundity in natural populations of two species of wolf spider</title><title>Conservation genetics</title><description>Long-term effective population size is expected, and has been shown, to correlate positively with various measures of population fitness. Here we examine the interacting effects of population size (as a surrogate for genetic factors) and prey consumption rates (as a surrogate for environmental quality) on fecundity in two sympatric species of wolf spider, Rabidosa punctulata and Rabidosa rabida. Population size was estimated in each of seven genetically isolated populations in each of 3 years using mark-recapture methods. Fecundity was estimated as the mean number of live offspring produced by ~15 females sampled from each population of each species each year for 3 years. Prey consumption rates were estimated by sampling ~300 spiders per population per year and assaying the proportion of spiders with prey. Larger populations have higher fecundity and more genetic diversity than smaller populations. Variation among populations in fecundity for a given year could be attributed most strongly to differences in population size, with variation in prey consumption rates and the interaction between population size and prey consumption playing smaller but still important roles. During the most stressful environmental conditions, the smallest populations of both species experienced disproportionately low-fecundity rates, more than doubling the estimated number of lethal equivalents during those years. The evidence presented in this paper for inbreeding-environment interactions at the population level and further evidence for a log-linear relationship between population size and fitness have important implications for conservation.</description><subject>Araneae</subject><subject>Environmental conditions</subject><subject>Environmental quality</subject><subject>extinction</subject><subject>Fecundity</subject><subject>Fitness</subject><subject>Genetic diversity</subject><subject>Genetic factors</subject><subject>Genetic stochasticity</subject><subject>genetic variation</subject><subject>Inbreeding</subject><subject>Lycosidae</subject><subject>Natural populations</subject><subject>Offspring</subject><subject>Population number</subject><subject>population size</subject><subject>Prey</subject><subject>Prey consumption</subject><subject>Spiders</subject><issn>1566-0621</issn><issn>1572-9737</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2007</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNpdkcFu2zAMQI1iBZql_YCeJuywmzuJsq3oOBTrViBAD2vPAiNThQJH8iR5Rf6-yrLTTiTBR4LEa5pbwe8E5-prFrzX0HI-tBoG3nYXzUr0ClqtpPpwyoeh5QOIq-ZjznvOxQBKrJrjY9glotGHVzbRH5oywzCyOdGR4W4JIwZLzIdCCW1hJbKRan7wgZgjWwFfjrXPApYl4cTmOC8TFh9DZtGx8hZZnsl6-lu-xcnV2o-UrptLh1Omm39x3bw8fH--_9lun3483n_btlaCKu0OLOC4s4NU1vUWiUBvhBjqtyhAOb3pkWQnrVCAFqTkPTnedRpAgtYg182X8945xd8L5WIOPluaJgwUl2yAy64HpSv4-T9wH5cU6m1G9VJ3Qm1UhcQZsinmnMiZOfkDpqMR3JxMmLMJU02YkwnT1ZlP5xmH0eBr8tm8_AIuZMU1VEHyHVzshiY</recordid><startdate>200709</startdate><enddate>200709</enddate><creator>Reed, David H</creator><creator>Nicholas, Amy C</creator><creator>Stratton, Gail E</creator><general>Dordrecht : Kluwer Academic Publishers</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>FBQ</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88A</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>RC3</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200709</creationdate><title>Inbreeding levels and prey abundance interact to determine fecundity in natural populations of two species of wolf spider</title><author>Reed, David H ; Nicholas, Amy C ; Stratton, Gail E</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c327t-b2c2adbc637cf5caee298116592a127f985ae343c172ac23305ef044922329923</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2007</creationdate><topic>Araneae</topic><topic>Environmental conditions</topic><topic>Environmental quality</topic><topic>extinction</topic><topic>Fecundity</topic><topic>Fitness</topic><topic>Genetic diversity</topic><topic>Genetic factors</topic><topic>Genetic stochasticity</topic><topic>genetic variation</topic><topic>Inbreeding</topic><topic>Lycosidae</topic><topic>Natural populations</topic><topic>Offspring</topic><topic>Population number</topic><topic>population size</topic><topic>Prey</topic><topic>Prey consumption</topic><topic>Spiders</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Reed, David H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nicholas, Amy C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stratton, Gail E</creatorcontrib><collection>AGRIS</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Biology Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Conservation genetics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Reed, David H</au><au>Nicholas, Amy C</au><au>Stratton, Gail E</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Inbreeding levels and prey abundance interact to determine fecundity in natural populations of two species of wolf spider</atitle><jtitle>Conservation genetics</jtitle><date>2007-09</date><risdate>2007</risdate><volume>8</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>1061</spage><epage>1071</epage><pages>1061-1071</pages><issn>1566-0621</issn><eissn>1572-9737</eissn><abstract>Long-term effective population size is expected, and has been shown, to correlate positively with various measures of population fitness. Here we examine the interacting effects of population size (as a surrogate for genetic factors) and prey consumption rates (as a surrogate for environmental quality) on fecundity in two sympatric species of wolf spider, Rabidosa punctulata and Rabidosa rabida. Population size was estimated in each of seven genetically isolated populations in each of 3 years using mark-recapture methods. Fecundity was estimated as the mean number of live offspring produced by ~15 females sampled from each population of each species each year for 3 years. Prey consumption rates were estimated by sampling ~300 spiders per population per year and assaying the proportion of spiders with prey. Larger populations have higher fecundity and more genetic diversity than smaller populations. Variation among populations in fecundity for a given year could be attributed most strongly to differences in population size, with variation in prey consumption rates and the interaction between population size and prey consumption playing smaller but still important roles. During the most stressful environmental conditions, the smallest populations of both species experienced disproportionately low-fecundity rates, more than doubling the estimated number of lethal equivalents during those years. The evidence presented in this paper for inbreeding-environment interactions at the population level and further evidence for a log-linear relationship between population size and fitness have important implications for conservation.</abstract><cop>Dordrecht</cop><pub>Dordrecht : Kluwer Academic Publishers</pub><doi>10.1007/s10592-006-9260-4</doi><tpages>11</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1566-0621 |
ispartof | Conservation genetics, 2007-09, Vol.8 (5), p.1061-1071 |
issn | 1566-0621 1572-9737 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_20345279 |
source | SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings |
subjects | Araneae Environmental conditions Environmental quality extinction Fecundity Fitness Genetic diversity Genetic factors Genetic stochasticity genetic variation Inbreeding Lycosidae Natural populations Offspring Population number population size Prey Prey consumption Spiders |
title | Inbreeding levels and prey abundance interact to determine fecundity in natural populations of two species of wolf spider |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-28T20%3A26%3A55IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Inbreeding%20levels%20and%20prey%20abundance%20interact%20to%20determine%20fecundity%20in%20natural%20populations%20of%20two%20species%20of%20wolf%20spider&rft.jtitle=Conservation%20genetics&rft.au=Reed,%20David%20H&rft.date=2007-09&rft.volume=8&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=1061&rft.epage=1071&rft.pages=1061-1071&rft.issn=1566-0621&rft.eissn=1572-9737&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s10592-006-9260-4&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2145928351%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=753941787&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |