Electrodermal activity patterns in sleep stages and their utility for sleep versus wake classification

Summary As the prevalence of sleep disorders is increasing, new methods for ambulatory sleep measurement are required. This paper presents electrodermal activity in different sleep stages and a sleep detection algorithm based on electrodermal activity. We analysed electrodermal activity and polysomn...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of sleep research 2019-04, Vol.28 (2), p.e12694-n/a
Hauptverfasser: Herlan, Anne, Ottenbacher, Jörg, Schneider, Johannes, Riemann, Dieter, Feige, Bernd
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Summary As the prevalence of sleep disorders is increasing, new methods for ambulatory sleep measurement are required. This paper presents electrodermal activity in different sleep stages and a sleep detection algorithm based on electrodermal activity. We analysed electrodermal activity and polysomnographic data of 43 healthy subjects and 48 patients with sleep disorders. Electrodermal activity was measured using an ambulatory device worn at the wrist. Two parameters to describe electrodermal activity were defined based on previous literature: EDASEF (electrodermal activity‐smoothed feature) as parameter for skin conductance level; and EDAcounts (number of electrodermal activity‐peaks) as skin conductance responses. Analysis of variance indicated significant EDASEF differences between the sleep stages wake versus N1, wake versus N2, wake versus slow‐wave sleep, and wake versus rapid eye movement. The analysis of EDAcounts also showed significant differences, especially in the stages slow‐wave sleep versus rapid eye movement. Between healthy subjects and patients, a significant disparity of EDAcounts was revealed in stage N1. Furthermore, the variances of EDASEF and EDAcounts in N1, N2 slow‐wave sleep and rapid eye movement were higher in the patient group (p [F test] 
ISSN:0962-1105
1365-2869
DOI:10.1111/jsr.12694