Crosstalk between phosphorylation and O‐GlcNAcylation: friend or foe

A wide variety of protein post‐translational modifications (PTMs) decorate cellular proteins, regulating their structure, interactions and ultimately their function. The density of co‐occurring PTMs on proteins can be very high, where multiple PTMs can positively or negatively influence each other&#...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The FEBS journal 2018-09, Vol.285 (17), p.3152-3167
Hauptverfasser: Laarse, Saar A. M., Leney, Aneika C., Heck, Albert J. R.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 3167
container_issue 17
container_start_page 3152
container_title The FEBS journal
container_volume 285
creator Laarse, Saar A. M.
Leney, Aneika C.
Heck, Albert J. R.
description A wide variety of protein post‐translational modifications (PTMs) decorate cellular proteins, regulating their structure, interactions and ultimately their function. The density of co‐occurring PTMs on proteins can be very high, where multiple PTMs can positively or negatively influence each other's actions, termed PTM crosstalk. In this review, we highlight recent progress in the area of PTM crosstalk, whereby we focus on crosstalk between protein phosphorylation and O‐GlcNAcylation. These two PTMs largely target identical (i.e., Ser and Thr) amino acids in proteins. Phosphorylation/O‐GlcNAcylation crosstalk comes in many flavors, for instance by competition for the same site/residue (reciprocal crosstalk), as well as by modifications influencing each other in proximity or even distal on the protein sequence. PTM crosstalk is observed on the writers of these modifications (i.e., kinases and O‐GlcNAc transferase), on the erasers (i.e., phosphatases and O‐GlcNAcase), and on the readers and the substrates. We describe examples of all these different flavors of crosstalk, and additionally the methods that are emerging to better investigate in particular phosphorylation/O‐GlcNAcylation crosstalk. Proteins can be modified by multiple, different post‐translational modifications (PTMs), which act to regulate protein structure and function. When the presence of one PTM affects another, this is termed PTM crosstalk. In this review, we highlight recent progress in the area of PTM crosstalk, focusing in particular on the crosstalk that exists between protein phosphorylation and an intracellular form of glycosylation, termed O‐GlcNAcylation.
doi_str_mv 10.1111/febs.14491
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2033380223</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2099842175</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-p3171-d3cca2c6f6046626c538a9100c6bc4b7d564b5a52755d5b1648c604ecb8ce9c53</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdkM1Kw0AQgBdRbK1efAAJePGSuv_JequlrUKxBxW8LZvNBlPTbN1NKL35CD6jT-L2xx4cGGaY-RiGD4BLBPsoxG1hMt9HlAp0BLoooTimnKXHh56-dcCZ93MICaNCnIIOFglKGEm6YDx01vtGVR9RZpqVMXW0fLc-pFtXqiltHak6j2Y_X9-TSj8N9H56FxWuNGFjXVRYcw5OClV5c7GvPfA6Hr0MH-LpbPI4HEzjJUEJinOitcKaFxxSzjHXjKRKIAg1zzTNkpxxmjHFcMJYzjLEaaoDanSWaiMC3QM3u7tLZz9b4xu5KL02VaVqY1svMSSEpBBjEtDrf-jctq4O3wVKiJTijYIeuNpTbbYwuVy6cqHcWv4ZCgDaAauyMuvDHkG5cS837uXWvRyP7p-3HfkF_3p2XQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2099842175</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Crosstalk between phosphorylation and O‐GlcNAcylation: friend or foe</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><source>Wiley Free Content</source><source>Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry</source><creator>Laarse, Saar A. M. ; Leney, Aneika C. ; Heck, Albert J. R.</creator><creatorcontrib>Laarse, Saar A. M. ; Leney, Aneika C. ; Heck, Albert J. R.</creatorcontrib><description>A wide variety of protein post‐translational modifications (PTMs) decorate cellular proteins, regulating their structure, interactions and ultimately their function. The density of co‐occurring PTMs on proteins can be very high, where multiple PTMs can positively or negatively influence each other's actions, termed PTM crosstalk. In this review, we highlight recent progress in the area of PTM crosstalk, whereby we focus on crosstalk between protein phosphorylation and O‐GlcNAcylation. These two PTMs largely target identical (i.e., Ser and Thr) amino acids in proteins. Phosphorylation/O‐GlcNAcylation crosstalk comes in many flavors, for instance by competition for the same site/residue (reciprocal crosstalk), as well as by modifications influencing each other in proximity or even distal on the protein sequence. PTM crosstalk is observed on the writers of these modifications (i.e., kinases and O‐GlcNAc transferase), on the erasers (i.e., phosphatases and O‐GlcNAcase), and on the readers and the substrates. We describe examples of all these different flavors of crosstalk, and additionally the methods that are emerging to better investigate in particular phosphorylation/O‐GlcNAcylation crosstalk. Proteins can be modified by multiple, different post‐translational modifications (PTMs), which act to regulate protein structure and function. When the presence of one PTM affects another, this is termed PTM crosstalk. In this review, we highlight recent progress in the area of PTM crosstalk, focusing in particular on the crosstalk that exists between protein phosphorylation and an intracellular form of glycosylation, termed O‐GlcNAcylation.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1742-464X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1742-4658</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/febs.14491</identifier><identifier>PMID: 29717537</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Amino acid sequence ; Amino acids ; Animals ; Cellular structure ; Crosstalk ; Flavors ; Glycosylation ; Humans ; interplay ; Kinases ; mass spectrometry ; O-GlcNAcylation ; Phosphorylation ; post‐translational modifications ; prediction ; Protein Processing, Post-Translational ; Proteins ; Proteins - chemistry ; Proteins - metabolism ; proteomics ; Signal Transduction ; signaling ; Substrates</subject><ispartof>The FEBS journal, 2018-09, Vol.285 (17), p.3152-3167</ispartof><rights>2018 Federation of European Biochemical Societies</rights><rights>2018 Federation of European Biochemical Societies.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2018 Federation of European Biochemical Societies</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><orcidid>0000-0002-2405-4404</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Ffebs.14491$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Ffebs.14491$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1417,1433,27923,27924,45573,45574,46408,46832</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29717537$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Laarse, Saar A. M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Leney, Aneika C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Heck, Albert J. R.</creatorcontrib><title>Crosstalk between phosphorylation and O‐GlcNAcylation: friend or foe</title><title>The FEBS journal</title><addtitle>FEBS J</addtitle><description>A wide variety of protein post‐translational modifications (PTMs) decorate cellular proteins, regulating their structure, interactions and ultimately their function. The density of co‐occurring PTMs on proteins can be very high, where multiple PTMs can positively or negatively influence each other's actions, termed PTM crosstalk. In this review, we highlight recent progress in the area of PTM crosstalk, whereby we focus on crosstalk between protein phosphorylation and O‐GlcNAcylation. These two PTMs largely target identical (i.e., Ser and Thr) amino acids in proteins. Phosphorylation/O‐GlcNAcylation crosstalk comes in many flavors, for instance by competition for the same site/residue (reciprocal crosstalk), as well as by modifications influencing each other in proximity or even distal on the protein sequence. PTM crosstalk is observed on the writers of these modifications (i.e., kinases and O‐GlcNAc transferase), on the erasers (i.e., phosphatases and O‐GlcNAcase), and on the readers and the substrates. We describe examples of all these different flavors of crosstalk, and additionally the methods that are emerging to better investigate in particular phosphorylation/O‐GlcNAcylation crosstalk. Proteins can be modified by multiple, different post‐translational modifications (PTMs), which act to regulate protein structure and function. When the presence of one PTM affects another, this is termed PTM crosstalk. In this review, we highlight recent progress in the area of PTM crosstalk, focusing in particular on the crosstalk that exists between protein phosphorylation and an intracellular form of glycosylation, termed O‐GlcNAcylation.</description><subject>Amino acid sequence</subject><subject>Amino acids</subject><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Cellular structure</subject><subject>Crosstalk</subject><subject>Flavors</subject><subject>Glycosylation</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>interplay</subject><subject>Kinases</subject><subject>mass spectrometry</subject><subject>O-GlcNAcylation</subject><subject>Phosphorylation</subject><subject>post‐translational modifications</subject><subject>prediction</subject><subject>Protein Processing, Post-Translational</subject><subject>Proteins</subject><subject>Proteins - chemistry</subject><subject>Proteins - metabolism</subject><subject>proteomics</subject><subject>Signal Transduction</subject><subject>signaling</subject><subject>Substrates</subject><issn>1742-464X</issn><issn>1742-4658</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNpdkM1Kw0AQgBdRbK1efAAJePGSuv_JequlrUKxBxW8LZvNBlPTbN1NKL35CD6jT-L2xx4cGGaY-RiGD4BLBPsoxG1hMt9HlAp0BLoooTimnKXHh56-dcCZ93MICaNCnIIOFglKGEm6YDx01vtGVR9RZpqVMXW0fLc-pFtXqiltHak6j2Y_X9-TSj8N9H56FxWuNGFjXVRYcw5OClV5c7GvPfA6Hr0MH-LpbPI4HEzjJUEJinOitcKaFxxSzjHXjKRKIAg1zzTNkpxxmjHFcMJYzjLEaaoDanSWaiMC3QM3u7tLZz9b4xu5KL02VaVqY1svMSSEpBBjEtDrf-jctq4O3wVKiJTijYIeuNpTbbYwuVy6cqHcWv4ZCgDaAauyMuvDHkG5cS837uXWvRyP7p-3HfkF_3p2XQ</recordid><startdate>201809</startdate><enddate>201809</enddate><creator>Laarse, Saar A. M.</creator><creator>Leney, Aneika C.</creator><creator>Heck, Albert J. R.</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7QP</scope><scope>7QR</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>7TM</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2405-4404</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>201809</creationdate><title>Crosstalk between phosphorylation and O‐GlcNAcylation: friend or foe</title><author>Laarse, Saar A. M. ; Leney, Aneika C. ; Heck, Albert J. R.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-p3171-d3cca2c6f6046626c538a9100c6bc4b7d564b5a52755d5b1648c604ecb8ce9c53</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Amino acid sequence</topic><topic>Amino acids</topic><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Cellular structure</topic><topic>Crosstalk</topic><topic>Flavors</topic><topic>Glycosylation</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>interplay</topic><topic>Kinases</topic><topic>mass spectrometry</topic><topic>O-GlcNAcylation</topic><topic>Phosphorylation</topic><topic>post‐translational modifications</topic><topic>prediction</topic><topic>Protein Processing, Post-Translational</topic><topic>Proteins</topic><topic>Proteins - chemistry</topic><topic>Proteins - metabolism</topic><topic>proteomics</topic><topic>Signal Transduction</topic><topic>signaling</topic><topic>Substrates</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Laarse, Saar A. M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Leney, Aneika C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Heck, Albert J. R.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Calcium &amp; Calcified Tissue Abstracts</collection><collection>Chemoreception Abstracts</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>Nucleic Acids Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>The FEBS journal</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Laarse, Saar A. M.</au><au>Leney, Aneika C.</au><au>Heck, Albert J. R.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Crosstalk between phosphorylation and O‐GlcNAcylation: friend or foe</atitle><jtitle>The FEBS journal</jtitle><addtitle>FEBS J</addtitle><date>2018-09</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>285</volume><issue>17</issue><spage>3152</spage><epage>3167</epage><pages>3152-3167</pages><issn>1742-464X</issn><eissn>1742-4658</eissn><abstract>A wide variety of protein post‐translational modifications (PTMs) decorate cellular proteins, regulating their structure, interactions and ultimately their function. The density of co‐occurring PTMs on proteins can be very high, where multiple PTMs can positively or negatively influence each other's actions, termed PTM crosstalk. In this review, we highlight recent progress in the area of PTM crosstalk, whereby we focus on crosstalk between protein phosphorylation and O‐GlcNAcylation. These two PTMs largely target identical (i.e., Ser and Thr) amino acids in proteins. Phosphorylation/O‐GlcNAcylation crosstalk comes in many flavors, for instance by competition for the same site/residue (reciprocal crosstalk), as well as by modifications influencing each other in proximity or even distal on the protein sequence. PTM crosstalk is observed on the writers of these modifications (i.e., kinases and O‐GlcNAc transferase), on the erasers (i.e., phosphatases and O‐GlcNAcase), and on the readers and the substrates. We describe examples of all these different flavors of crosstalk, and additionally the methods that are emerging to better investigate in particular phosphorylation/O‐GlcNAcylation crosstalk. Proteins can be modified by multiple, different post‐translational modifications (PTMs), which act to regulate protein structure and function. When the presence of one PTM affects another, this is termed PTM crosstalk. In this review, we highlight recent progress in the area of PTM crosstalk, focusing in particular on the crosstalk that exists between protein phosphorylation and an intracellular form of glycosylation, termed O‐GlcNAcylation.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><pmid>29717537</pmid><doi>10.1111/febs.14491</doi><tpages>16</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2405-4404</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1742-464X
ispartof The FEBS journal, 2018-09, Vol.285 (17), p.3152-3167
issn 1742-464X
1742-4658
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2033380223
source MEDLINE; Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete; Wiley Free Content; Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry
subjects Amino acid sequence
Amino acids
Animals
Cellular structure
Crosstalk
Flavors
Glycosylation
Humans
interplay
Kinases
mass spectrometry
O-GlcNAcylation
Phosphorylation
post‐translational modifications
prediction
Protein Processing, Post-Translational
Proteins
Proteins - chemistry
Proteins - metabolism
proteomics
Signal Transduction
signaling
Substrates
title Crosstalk between phosphorylation and O‐GlcNAcylation: friend or foe
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-09T03%3A44%3A54IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Crosstalk%20between%20phosphorylation%20and%20O%E2%80%90GlcNAcylation:%20friend%20or%20foe&rft.jtitle=The%20FEBS%20journal&rft.au=Laarse,%20Saar%20A.%20M.&rft.date=2018-09&rft.volume=285&rft.issue=17&rft.spage=3152&rft.epage=3167&rft.pages=3152-3167&rft.issn=1742-464X&rft.eissn=1742-4658&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/febs.14491&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2099842175%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2099842175&rft_id=info:pmid/29717537&rfr_iscdi=true