Crosstalk between phosphorylation and O‐GlcNAcylation: friend or foe
A wide variety of protein post‐translational modifications (PTMs) decorate cellular proteins, regulating their structure, interactions and ultimately their function. The density of co‐occurring PTMs on proteins can be very high, where multiple PTMs can positively or negatively influence each other...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | The FEBS journal 2018-09, Vol.285 (17), p.3152-3167 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 3167 |
---|---|
container_issue | 17 |
container_start_page | 3152 |
container_title | The FEBS journal |
container_volume | 285 |
creator | Laarse, Saar A. M. Leney, Aneika C. Heck, Albert J. R. |
description | A wide variety of protein post‐translational modifications (PTMs) decorate cellular proteins, regulating their structure, interactions and ultimately their function. The density of co‐occurring PTMs on proteins can be very high, where multiple PTMs can positively or negatively influence each other's actions, termed PTM crosstalk. In this review, we highlight recent progress in the area of PTM crosstalk, whereby we focus on crosstalk between protein phosphorylation and O‐GlcNAcylation. These two PTMs largely target identical (i.e., Ser and Thr) amino acids in proteins. Phosphorylation/O‐GlcNAcylation crosstalk comes in many flavors, for instance by competition for the same site/residue (reciprocal crosstalk), as well as by modifications influencing each other in proximity or even distal on the protein sequence. PTM crosstalk is observed on the writers of these modifications (i.e., kinases and O‐GlcNAc transferase), on the erasers (i.e., phosphatases and O‐GlcNAcase), and on the readers and the substrates. We describe examples of all these different flavors of crosstalk, and additionally the methods that are emerging to better investigate in particular phosphorylation/O‐GlcNAcylation crosstalk.
Proteins can be modified by multiple, different post‐translational modifications (PTMs), which act to regulate protein structure and function. When the presence of one PTM affects another, this is termed PTM crosstalk. In this review, we highlight recent progress in the area of PTM crosstalk, focusing in particular on the crosstalk that exists between protein phosphorylation and an intracellular form of glycosylation, termed O‐GlcNAcylation. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1111/febs.14491 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2033380223</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2099842175</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-p3171-d3cca2c6f6046626c538a9100c6bc4b7d564b5a52755d5b1648c604ecb8ce9c53</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdkM1Kw0AQgBdRbK1efAAJePGSuv_JequlrUKxBxW8LZvNBlPTbN1NKL35CD6jT-L2xx4cGGaY-RiGD4BLBPsoxG1hMt9HlAp0BLoooTimnKXHh56-dcCZ93MICaNCnIIOFglKGEm6YDx01vtGVR9RZpqVMXW0fLc-pFtXqiltHak6j2Y_X9-TSj8N9H56FxWuNGFjXVRYcw5OClV5c7GvPfA6Hr0MH-LpbPI4HEzjJUEJinOitcKaFxxSzjHXjKRKIAg1zzTNkpxxmjHFcMJYzjLEaaoDanSWaiMC3QM3u7tLZz9b4xu5KL02VaVqY1svMSSEpBBjEtDrf-jctq4O3wVKiJTijYIeuNpTbbYwuVy6cqHcWv4ZCgDaAauyMuvDHkG5cS837uXWvRyP7p-3HfkF_3p2XQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2099842175</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Crosstalk between phosphorylation and O‐GlcNAcylation: friend or foe</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><source>Wiley Free Content</source><source>Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry</source><creator>Laarse, Saar A. M. ; Leney, Aneika C. ; Heck, Albert J. R.</creator><creatorcontrib>Laarse, Saar A. M. ; Leney, Aneika C. ; Heck, Albert J. R.</creatorcontrib><description>A wide variety of protein post‐translational modifications (PTMs) decorate cellular proteins, regulating their structure, interactions and ultimately their function. The density of co‐occurring PTMs on proteins can be very high, where multiple PTMs can positively or negatively influence each other's actions, termed PTM crosstalk. In this review, we highlight recent progress in the area of PTM crosstalk, whereby we focus on crosstalk between protein phosphorylation and O‐GlcNAcylation. These two PTMs largely target identical (i.e., Ser and Thr) amino acids in proteins. Phosphorylation/O‐GlcNAcylation crosstalk comes in many flavors, for instance by competition for the same site/residue (reciprocal crosstalk), as well as by modifications influencing each other in proximity or even distal on the protein sequence. PTM crosstalk is observed on the writers of these modifications (i.e., kinases and O‐GlcNAc transferase), on the erasers (i.e., phosphatases and O‐GlcNAcase), and on the readers and the substrates. We describe examples of all these different flavors of crosstalk, and additionally the methods that are emerging to better investigate in particular phosphorylation/O‐GlcNAcylation crosstalk.
Proteins can be modified by multiple, different post‐translational modifications (PTMs), which act to regulate protein structure and function. When the presence of one PTM affects another, this is termed PTM crosstalk. In this review, we highlight recent progress in the area of PTM crosstalk, focusing in particular on the crosstalk that exists between protein phosphorylation and an intracellular form of glycosylation, termed O‐GlcNAcylation.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1742-464X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1742-4658</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/febs.14491</identifier><identifier>PMID: 29717537</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Amino acid sequence ; Amino acids ; Animals ; Cellular structure ; Crosstalk ; Flavors ; Glycosylation ; Humans ; interplay ; Kinases ; mass spectrometry ; O-GlcNAcylation ; Phosphorylation ; post‐translational modifications ; prediction ; Protein Processing, Post-Translational ; Proteins ; Proteins - chemistry ; Proteins - metabolism ; proteomics ; Signal Transduction ; signaling ; Substrates</subject><ispartof>The FEBS journal, 2018-09, Vol.285 (17), p.3152-3167</ispartof><rights>2018 Federation of European Biochemical Societies</rights><rights>2018 Federation of European Biochemical Societies.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2018 Federation of European Biochemical Societies</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><orcidid>0000-0002-2405-4404</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Ffebs.14491$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Ffebs.14491$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1417,1433,27923,27924,45573,45574,46408,46832</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29717537$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Laarse, Saar A. M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Leney, Aneika C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Heck, Albert J. R.</creatorcontrib><title>Crosstalk between phosphorylation and O‐GlcNAcylation: friend or foe</title><title>The FEBS journal</title><addtitle>FEBS J</addtitle><description>A wide variety of protein post‐translational modifications (PTMs) decorate cellular proteins, regulating their structure, interactions and ultimately their function. The density of co‐occurring PTMs on proteins can be very high, where multiple PTMs can positively or negatively influence each other's actions, termed PTM crosstalk. In this review, we highlight recent progress in the area of PTM crosstalk, whereby we focus on crosstalk between protein phosphorylation and O‐GlcNAcylation. These two PTMs largely target identical (i.e., Ser and Thr) amino acids in proteins. Phosphorylation/O‐GlcNAcylation crosstalk comes in many flavors, for instance by competition for the same site/residue (reciprocal crosstalk), as well as by modifications influencing each other in proximity or even distal on the protein sequence. PTM crosstalk is observed on the writers of these modifications (i.e., kinases and O‐GlcNAc transferase), on the erasers (i.e., phosphatases and O‐GlcNAcase), and on the readers and the substrates. We describe examples of all these different flavors of crosstalk, and additionally the methods that are emerging to better investigate in particular phosphorylation/O‐GlcNAcylation crosstalk.
Proteins can be modified by multiple, different post‐translational modifications (PTMs), which act to regulate protein structure and function. When the presence of one PTM affects another, this is termed PTM crosstalk. In this review, we highlight recent progress in the area of PTM crosstalk, focusing in particular on the crosstalk that exists between protein phosphorylation and an intracellular form of glycosylation, termed O‐GlcNAcylation.</description><subject>Amino acid sequence</subject><subject>Amino acids</subject><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Cellular structure</subject><subject>Crosstalk</subject><subject>Flavors</subject><subject>Glycosylation</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>interplay</subject><subject>Kinases</subject><subject>mass spectrometry</subject><subject>O-GlcNAcylation</subject><subject>Phosphorylation</subject><subject>post‐translational modifications</subject><subject>prediction</subject><subject>Protein Processing, Post-Translational</subject><subject>Proteins</subject><subject>Proteins - chemistry</subject><subject>Proteins - metabolism</subject><subject>proteomics</subject><subject>Signal Transduction</subject><subject>signaling</subject><subject>Substrates</subject><issn>1742-464X</issn><issn>1742-4658</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNpdkM1Kw0AQgBdRbK1efAAJePGSuv_JequlrUKxBxW8LZvNBlPTbN1NKL35CD6jT-L2xx4cGGaY-RiGD4BLBPsoxG1hMt9HlAp0BLoooTimnKXHh56-dcCZ93MICaNCnIIOFglKGEm6YDx01vtGVR9RZpqVMXW0fLc-pFtXqiltHak6j2Y_X9-TSj8N9H56FxWuNGFjXVRYcw5OClV5c7GvPfA6Hr0MH-LpbPI4HEzjJUEJinOitcKaFxxSzjHXjKRKIAg1zzTNkpxxmjHFcMJYzjLEaaoDanSWaiMC3QM3u7tLZz9b4xu5KL02VaVqY1svMSSEpBBjEtDrf-jctq4O3wVKiJTijYIeuNpTbbYwuVy6cqHcWv4ZCgDaAauyMuvDHkG5cS837uXWvRyP7p-3HfkF_3p2XQ</recordid><startdate>201809</startdate><enddate>201809</enddate><creator>Laarse, Saar A. M.</creator><creator>Leney, Aneika C.</creator><creator>Heck, Albert J. R.</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7QP</scope><scope>7QR</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>7TM</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2405-4404</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>201809</creationdate><title>Crosstalk between phosphorylation and O‐GlcNAcylation: friend or foe</title><author>Laarse, Saar A. M. ; Leney, Aneika C. ; Heck, Albert J. R.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-p3171-d3cca2c6f6046626c538a9100c6bc4b7d564b5a52755d5b1648c604ecb8ce9c53</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Amino acid sequence</topic><topic>Amino acids</topic><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Cellular structure</topic><topic>Crosstalk</topic><topic>Flavors</topic><topic>Glycosylation</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>interplay</topic><topic>Kinases</topic><topic>mass spectrometry</topic><topic>O-GlcNAcylation</topic><topic>Phosphorylation</topic><topic>post‐translational modifications</topic><topic>prediction</topic><topic>Protein Processing, Post-Translational</topic><topic>Proteins</topic><topic>Proteins - chemistry</topic><topic>Proteins - metabolism</topic><topic>proteomics</topic><topic>Signal Transduction</topic><topic>signaling</topic><topic>Substrates</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Laarse, Saar A. M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Leney, Aneika C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Heck, Albert J. R.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Calcium & Calcified Tissue Abstracts</collection><collection>Chemoreception Abstracts</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>Nucleic Acids Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>The FEBS journal</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Laarse, Saar A. M.</au><au>Leney, Aneika C.</au><au>Heck, Albert J. R.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Crosstalk between phosphorylation and O‐GlcNAcylation: friend or foe</atitle><jtitle>The FEBS journal</jtitle><addtitle>FEBS J</addtitle><date>2018-09</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>285</volume><issue>17</issue><spage>3152</spage><epage>3167</epage><pages>3152-3167</pages><issn>1742-464X</issn><eissn>1742-4658</eissn><abstract>A wide variety of protein post‐translational modifications (PTMs) decorate cellular proteins, regulating their structure, interactions and ultimately their function. The density of co‐occurring PTMs on proteins can be very high, where multiple PTMs can positively or negatively influence each other's actions, termed PTM crosstalk. In this review, we highlight recent progress in the area of PTM crosstalk, whereby we focus on crosstalk between protein phosphorylation and O‐GlcNAcylation. These two PTMs largely target identical (i.e., Ser and Thr) amino acids in proteins. Phosphorylation/O‐GlcNAcylation crosstalk comes in many flavors, for instance by competition for the same site/residue (reciprocal crosstalk), as well as by modifications influencing each other in proximity or even distal on the protein sequence. PTM crosstalk is observed on the writers of these modifications (i.e., kinases and O‐GlcNAc transferase), on the erasers (i.e., phosphatases and O‐GlcNAcase), and on the readers and the substrates. We describe examples of all these different flavors of crosstalk, and additionally the methods that are emerging to better investigate in particular phosphorylation/O‐GlcNAcylation crosstalk.
Proteins can be modified by multiple, different post‐translational modifications (PTMs), which act to regulate protein structure and function. When the presence of one PTM affects another, this is termed PTM crosstalk. In this review, we highlight recent progress in the area of PTM crosstalk, focusing in particular on the crosstalk that exists between protein phosphorylation and an intracellular form of glycosylation, termed O‐GlcNAcylation.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><pmid>29717537</pmid><doi>10.1111/febs.14491</doi><tpages>16</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2405-4404</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1742-464X |
ispartof | The FEBS journal, 2018-09, Vol.285 (17), p.3152-3167 |
issn | 1742-464X 1742-4658 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2033380223 |
source | MEDLINE; Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete; Wiley Free Content; Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry |
subjects | Amino acid sequence Amino acids Animals Cellular structure Crosstalk Flavors Glycosylation Humans interplay Kinases mass spectrometry O-GlcNAcylation Phosphorylation post‐translational modifications prediction Protein Processing, Post-Translational Proteins Proteins - chemistry Proteins - metabolism proteomics Signal Transduction signaling Substrates |
title | Crosstalk between phosphorylation and O‐GlcNAcylation: friend or foe |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-09T03%3A44%3A54IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Crosstalk%20between%20phosphorylation%20and%20O%E2%80%90GlcNAcylation:%20friend%20or%20foe&rft.jtitle=The%20FEBS%20journal&rft.au=Laarse,%20Saar%20A.%20M.&rft.date=2018-09&rft.volume=285&rft.issue=17&rft.spage=3152&rft.epage=3167&rft.pages=3152-3167&rft.issn=1742-464X&rft.eissn=1742-4658&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/febs.14491&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2099842175%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2099842175&rft_id=info:pmid/29717537&rfr_iscdi=true |