How much water is required for coal power generation: An analysis of gray and blue water footprints

Although water resource shortage is closely connected with coal-based electricity generation, relevant water footprint analyses remain limited. This study aims to address this limitation by conducting a water footprint analysis of coal-based electricity generation in China for the first time to info...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The Science of the total environment 2018-09, Vol.636, p.547-557
Hauptverfasser: Ma, Xiaotian, Yang, Donglu, Shen, Xiaoxu, Zhai, Yijie, Zhang, Ruirui, Hong, Jinglan
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 557
container_issue
container_start_page 547
container_title The Science of the total environment
container_volume 636
creator Ma, Xiaotian
Yang, Donglu
Shen, Xiaoxu
Zhai, Yijie
Zhang, Ruirui
Hong, Jinglan
description Although water resource shortage is closely connected with coal-based electricity generation, relevant water footprint analyses remain limited. This study aims to address this limitation by conducting a water footprint analysis of coal-based electricity generation in China for the first time to inform decision-makers about how freshwater consumption and wastewater discharge can be reduced. In China, 1 kWh of electricity supply obtained 1.78 × 10−3 m3 of gray water footprint in 2015, and the value is 1.3 times the blue water footprint score of 1.35 × 10−3 m3/kWh. Although water footprint of 1 kWh of electricity supply decreased, the national total gray water footprint increased significantly from 2006 to 2015 with increase in power generating capacity. An opposite trend was observed for blue water footprint. Indirect processes dominated the influence of gray water footprint, whereas direct freshwater consumption contributed 63.6% to blue water footprint. Ameliorating key processes, including transportation, direct freshwater consumption, direct air emissions, and coal washing could thus bring substantial environmental benefits. Moreover, phosphorus, mercury, hexavalent chromium, arsenic, COD, and BOD5 were key substances of gray water footprint. Results indicated that the combination of railway and water transportation should be prioritized. The targeted transition toward high coal washing rate and pithead power plant development provides a possibility to relieve environmental burdens, but constraints on water resources in coal production sites have to be considered. [Display omitted] •A water footprint analysis of coal power generation in China is conducted.•The water footprint of coal power generation is 3.2 × 10−3 m3/kWh in 2015.•National gray water footprint in China exceeded blue water footprint since 2013.•Transport, freshwater consumption, and direct air emission are key processes.•Control of phosphorus and heavy metals should be strengthened.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.04.309
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2033372661</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0048969718314876</els_id><sourcerecordid>2033372661</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c371t-6a85b00564bb731b4b49094bdaa986518a8dd4d111285ec37ac4210d660d64943</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkE9v4yAQxVHV1Tbt7ldoOe7FLmNjDHuLqv6TKvWye0YYxq0jx6SAG-Xblyhpr0VCSMN7b2Z-hFwBK4GBuF6V0Q7JJ5zey4qBLBkva6ZOyAJkqwpglTglC8a4LJRQ7Rk5j3HF8mkl_CRnlWqhEY1aEPvgt3Q921e6NQkDHSIN-DYPAR3tfaDWm5Fu_DZ_veCEwaTBT3_pcqJmMuMuZr3v6Uswu1xwtBtnPCb13qdNGKYUf5EfvRkj_j6-F-T_3e2_m4fi6fn-8Wb5VNi6hVQII5uOsUbwrmtr6HjHFVO8c8YoKRqQRjrHHQBUssHsMZZXwJwQ-XLF6wvy55C7Cf5txpj0eogWx9FM6OeoK1bXdVsJAVnaHqQ2-BgD9jqPujZhp4HpPWG90l-E9Z6wZlxnwtl5eWwyd2t0X75PpFmwPAgwr_o-YNgH4WTRZag2aeeHb5t8AFI9kXY</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2033372661</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>How much water is required for coal power generation: An analysis of gray and blue water footprints</title><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Ma, Xiaotian ; Yang, Donglu ; Shen, Xiaoxu ; Zhai, Yijie ; Zhang, Ruirui ; Hong, Jinglan</creator><creatorcontrib>Ma, Xiaotian ; Yang, Donglu ; Shen, Xiaoxu ; Zhai, Yijie ; Zhang, Ruirui ; Hong, Jinglan</creatorcontrib><description>Although water resource shortage is closely connected with coal-based electricity generation, relevant water footprint analyses remain limited. This study aims to address this limitation by conducting a water footprint analysis of coal-based electricity generation in China for the first time to inform decision-makers about how freshwater consumption and wastewater discharge can be reduced. In China, 1 kWh of electricity supply obtained 1.78 × 10−3 m3 of gray water footprint in 2015, and the value is 1.3 times the blue water footprint score of 1.35 × 10−3 m3/kWh. Although water footprint of 1 kWh of electricity supply decreased, the national total gray water footprint increased significantly from 2006 to 2015 with increase in power generating capacity. An opposite trend was observed for blue water footprint. Indirect processes dominated the influence of gray water footprint, whereas direct freshwater consumption contributed 63.6% to blue water footprint. Ameliorating key processes, including transportation, direct freshwater consumption, direct air emissions, and coal washing could thus bring substantial environmental benefits. Moreover, phosphorus, mercury, hexavalent chromium, arsenic, COD, and BOD5 were key substances of gray water footprint. Results indicated that the combination of railway and water transportation should be prioritized. The targeted transition toward high coal washing rate and pithead power plant development provides a possibility to relieve environmental burdens, but constraints on water resources in coal production sites have to be considered. [Display omitted] •A water footprint analysis of coal power generation in China is conducted.•The water footprint of coal power generation is 3.2 × 10−3 m3/kWh in 2015.•National gray water footprint in China exceeded blue water footprint since 2013.•Transport, freshwater consumption, and direct air emission are key processes.•Control of phosphorus and heavy metals should be strengthened.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0048-9697</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1879-1026</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.04.309</identifier><identifier>PMID: 29715659</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Netherlands: Elsevier B.V</publisher><subject>Coal-based electricity ; Life cycle assessment ; Time course ; Transportation ; Water footprint</subject><ispartof>The Science of the total environment, 2018-09, Vol.636, p.547-557</ispartof><rights>2018 Elsevier B.V.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2018 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c371t-6a85b00564bb731b4b49094bdaa986518a8dd4d111285ec37ac4210d660d64943</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c371t-6a85b00564bb731b4b49094bdaa986518a8dd4d111285ec37ac4210d660d64943</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.04.309$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3536,27903,27904,45974</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29715659$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Ma, Xiaotian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yang, Donglu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shen, Xiaoxu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhai, Yijie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhang, Ruirui</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hong, Jinglan</creatorcontrib><title>How much water is required for coal power generation: An analysis of gray and blue water footprints</title><title>The Science of the total environment</title><addtitle>Sci Total Environ</addtitle><description>Although water resource shortage is closely connected with coal-based electricity generation, relevant water footprint analyses remain limited. This study aims to address this limitation by conducting a water footprint analysis of coal-based electricity generation in China for the first time to inform decision-makers about how freshwater consumption and wastewater discharge can be reduced. In China, 1 kWh of electricity supply obtained 1.78 × 10−3 m3 of gray water footprint in 2015, and the value is 1.3 times the blue water footprint score of 1.35 × 10−3 m3/kWh. Although water footprint of 1 kWh of electricity supply decreased, the national total gray water footprint increased significantly from 2006 to 2015 with increase in power generating capacity. An opposite trend was observed for blue water footprint. Indirect processes dominated the influence of gray water footprint, whereas direct freshwater consumption contributed 63.6% to blue water footprint. Ameliorating key processes, including transportation, direct freshwater consumption, direct air emissions, and coal washing could thus bring substantial environmental benefits. Moreover, phosphorus, mercury, hexavalent chromium, arsenic, COD, and BOD5 were key substances of gray water footprint. Results indicated that the combination of railway and water transportation should be prioritized. The targeted transition toward high coal washing rate and pithead power plant development provides a possibility to relieve environmental burdens, but constraints on water resources in coal production sites have to be considered. [Display omitted] •A water footprint analysis of coal power generation in China is conducted.•The water footprint of coal power generation is 3.2 × 10−3 m3/kWh in 2015.•National gray water footprint in China exceeded blue water footprint since 2013.•Transport, freshwater consumption, and direct air emission are key processes.•Control of phosphorus and heavy metals should be strengthened.</description><subject>Coal-based electricity</subject><subject>Life cycle assessment</subject><subject>Time course</subject><subject>Transportation</subject><subject>Water footprint</subject><issn>0048-9697</issn><issn>1879-1026</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkE9v4yAQxVHV1Tbt7ldoOe7FLmNjDHuLqv6TKvWye0YYxq0jx6SAG-Xblyhpr0VCSMN7b2Z-hFwBK4GBuF6V0Q7JJ5zey4qBLBkva6ZOyAJkqwpglTglC8a4LJRQ7Rk5j3HF8mkl_CRnlWqhEY1aEPvgt3Q921e6NQkDHSIN-DYPAR3tfaDWm5Fu_DZ_veCEwaTBT3_pcqJmMuMuZr3v6Uswu1xwtBtnPCb13qdNGKYUf5EfvRkj_j6-F-T_3e2_m4fi6fn-8Wb5VNi6hVQII5uOsUbwrmtr6HjHFVO8c8YoKRqQRjrHHQBUssHsMZZXwJwQ-XLF6wvy55C7Cf5txpj0eogWx9FM6OeoK1bXdVsJAVnaHqQ2-BgD9jqPujZhp4HpPWG90l-E9Z6wZlxnwtl5eWwyd2t0X75PpFmwPAgwr_o-YNgH4WTRZag2aeeHb5t8AFI9kXY</recordid><startdate>20180915</startdate><enddate>20180915</enddate><creator>Ma, Xiaotian</creator><creator>Yang, Donglu</creator><creator>Shen, Xiaoxu</creator><creator>Zhai, Yijie</creator><creator>Zhang, Ruirui</creator><creator>Hong, Jinglan</creator><general>Elsevier B.V</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20180915</creationdate><title>How much water is required for coal power generation: An analysis of gray and blue water footprints</title><author>Ma, Xiaotian ; Yang, Donglu ; Shen, Xiaoxu ; Zhai, Yijie ; Zhang, Ruirui ; Hong, Jinglan</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c371t-6a85b00564bb731b4b49094bdaa986518a8dd4d111285ec37ac4210d660d64943</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Coal-based electricity</topic><topic>Life cycle assessment</topic><topic>Time course</topic><topic>Transportation</topic><topic>Water footprint</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Ma, Xiaotian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yang, Donglu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shen, Xiaoxu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhai, Yijie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhang, Ruirui</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hong, Jinglan</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>The Science of the total environment</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Ma, Xiaotian</au><au>Yang, Donglu</au><au>Shen, Xiaoxu</au><au>Zhai, Yijie</au><au>Zhang, Ruirui</au><au>Hong, Jinglan</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>How much water is required for coal power generation: An analysis of gray and blue water footprints</atitle><jtitle>The Science of the total environment</jtitle><addtitle>Sci Total Environ</addtitle><date>2018-09-15</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>636</volume><spage>547</spage><epage>557</epage><pages>547-557</pages><issn>0048-9697</issn><eissn>1879-1026</eissn><abstract>Although water resource shortage is closely connected with coal-based electricity generation, relevant water footprint analyses remain limited. This study aims to address this limitation by conducting a water footprint analysis of coal-based electricity generation in China for the first time to inform decision-makers about how freshwater consumption and wastewater discharge can be reduced. In China, 1 kWh of electricity supply obtained 1.78 × 10−3 m3 of gray water footprint in 2015, and the value is 1.3 times the blue water footprint score of 1.35 × 10−3 m3/kWh. Although water footprint of 1 kWh of electricity supply decreased, the national total gray water footprint increased significantly from 2006 to 2015 with increase in power generating capacity. An opposite trend was observed for blue water footprint. Indirect processes dominated the influence of gray water footprint, whereas direct freshwater consumption contributed 63.6% to blue water footprint. Ameliorating key processes, including transportation, direct freshwater consumption, direct air emissions, and coal washing could thus bring substantial environmental benefits. Moreover, phosphorus, mercury, hexavalent chromium, arsenic, COD, and BOD5 were key substances of gray water footprint. Results indicated that the combination of railway and water transportation should be prioritized. The targeted transition toward high coal washing rate and pithead power plant development provides a possibility to relieve environmental burdens, but constraints on water resources in coal production sites have to be considered. [Display omitted] •A water footprint analysis of coal power generation in China is conducted.•The water footprint of coal power generation is 3.2 × 10−3 m3/kWh in 2015.•National gray water footprint in China exceeded blue water footprint since 2013.•Transport, freshwater consumption, and direct air emission are key processes.•Control of phosphorus and heavy metals should be strengthened.</abstract><cop>Netherlands</cop><pub>Elsevier B.V</pub><pmid>29715659</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.04.309</doi><tpages>11</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0048-9697
ispartof The Science of the total environment, 2018-09, Vol.636, p.547-557
issn 0048-9697
1879-1026
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2033372661
source Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals
subjects Coal-based electricity
Life cycle assessment
Time course
Transportation
Water footprint
title How much water is required for coal power generation: An analysis of gray and blue water footprints
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-21T19%3A19%3A32IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=How%20much%20water%20is%20required%20for%20coal%20power%20generation:%20An%20analysis%20of%20gray%20and%20blue%20water%20footprints&rft.jtitle=The%20Science%20of%20the%20total%20environment&rft.au=Ma,%20Xiaotian&rft.date=2018-09-15&rft.volume=636&rft.spage=547&rft.epage=557&rft.pages=547-557&rft.issn=0048-9697&rft.eissn=1879-1026&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.04.309&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2033372661%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2033372661&rft_id=info:pmid/29715659&rft_els_id=S0048969718314876&rfr_iscdi=true