Establishing the competences of clinical reasoning for nursing students in Taiwan: From the nurse educators' perspectives
Clinical reasoning is an essential core competence for nurses. Maintaining quality of care and safety of patients results from cultivation of student's clinical reasoning competency. However, the concept of clinical reasoning in nursing students is complex and its meaning and process needs furt...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Nurse education today 2018-07, Vol.66, p.110-116 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 116 |
---|---|
container_issue | |
container_start_page | 110 |
container_title | Nurse education today |
container_volume | 66 |
creator | Huang, Hui-Man Huang, Chu-Yu Lee-Hsieh, Jane Cheng, Su-Fen |
description | Clinical reasoning is an essential core competence for nurses. Maintaining quality of care and safety of patients results from cultivation of student's clinical reasoning competency. However, the concept of clinical reasoning in nursing students is complex and its meaning and process needs further clarification.
The objectives were to explore the meaning of clinical reasoning competency in Taiwanese nursing students and to operationalize the concept in order to structure a framework illustrating the process of clinical reasoning.
Thirteen seasoned nursing experts who had more than ten years of experience in nursing education or clinical practice participated in the interviews. The interviews were conducted in settings that the participants perceived as convenient, quiet and free of disturbance.
Semi-structured interviews were conducted. The interviews were audio-recorded and field notes were taken. The data were analyzed using Waltz et al.'s (2010) method of content analysis.
The data revealed four domains and 11 competency indicators. The four domains include: awareness of clinical cues, confirmation of clinical problems, determination and implementation of actions, and evaluation and self-reflection. Each domain comprises of 2–4 indicators of clinical reasoning competency. In addition, this study established a framework for cultivation of clinical reasoning competency in nursing students.
The indicators of clinical reasoning competency in nursing students are interwoven, interactive and interdependent to form a dynamic process. The findings of this study may facilitate evaluation of nursing students' clinical reasoning competency and development of instruments to assess clinical reasoning in nursing students. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.nedt.2018.04.007 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2032403766</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0260691718301667</els_id><sourcerecordid>2088758705</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c450t-48edcaee7732c8c1e989bde899a1ffda54196de708b674a6a8aec90bc66fa49c3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kc1u1TAQRiMEopfCC7BAlljAJmHsJP5BbFDVAlIlNmVtOfaE-iqxg-0U9e1JuIUFC1Yzi_N9Gs2pqpcUGgqUvzs2AV1pGFDZQNcAiEfVgfYtq5lQ7ePqAIxDzRUVZ9WznI8AIAVrn1ZnTAlgXasO1f1lLmaYfL714Tspt0hsnBcsGCxmEkdiJx-8NRNJaHIMOzXGRMKa8r7nsjoMJRMfyI3xP014T65SnH9X7RASdKs1Jab8hiyY8oK2-DvMz6sno5kyvniY59W3q8ubi8_19ddPXy4-Xte266HUnURnDaIQLbPSUlRSDQ6lUoaOozN9RxV3KEAOXHSGG2nQKhgs56PplG3Pq7en3iXFHyvmomefLU6TCRjXrBm0rINWcL6hr_9Bj3FNYbtuo6QUvRTQbxQ7UTbFnBOOekl-NuleU9C7GH3Uuxi9i9HQ6U3MFnr1UL0OM7q_kT8mNuDDCcDtF3cek87W7xacT9vHtIv-f_2_ALgdoZg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2088758705</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Establishing the competences of clinical reasoning for nursing students in Taiwan: From the nurse educators' perspectives</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><source>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><creator>Huang, Hui-Man ; Huang, Chu-Yu ; Lee-Hsieh, Jane ; Cheng, Su-Fen</creator><creatorcontrib>Huang, Hui-Man ; Huang, Chu-Yu ; Lee-Hsieh, Jane ; Cheng, Su-Fen</creatorcontrib><description>Clinical reasoning is an essential core competence for nurses. Maintaining quality of care and safety of patients results from cultivation of student's clinical reasoning competency. However, the concept of clinical reasoning in nursing students is complex and its meaning and process needs further clarification.
The objectives were to explore the meaning of clinical reasoning competency in Taiwanese nursing students and to operationalize the concept in order to structure a framework illustrating the process of clinical reasoning.
Thirteen seasoned nursing experts who had more than ten years of experience in nursing education or clinical practice participated in the interviews. The interviews were conducted in settings that the participants perceived as convenient, quiet and free of disturbance.
Semi-structured interviews were conducted. The interviews were audio-recorded and field notes were taken. The data were analyzed using Waltz et al.'s (2010) method of content analysis.
The data revealed four domains and 11 competency indicators. The four domains include: awareness of clinical cues, confirmation of clinical problems, determination and implementation of actions, and evaluation and self-reflection. Each domain comprises of 2–4 indicators of clinical reasoning competency. In addition, this study established a framework for cultivation of clinical reasoning competency in nursing students.
The indicators of clinical reasoning competency in nursing students are interwoven, interactive and interdependent to form a dynamic process. The findings of this study may facilitate evaluation of nursing students' clinical reasoning competency and development of instruments to assess clinical reasoning in nursing students.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0260-6917</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1532-2793</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.nedt.2018.04.007</identifier><identifier>PMID: 29702439</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Scotland: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Adult ; Clinical Competence ; Clinical cue ; Clinical decision making ; Clinical medicine ; Clinical nursing ; Clinical reasoning ; Competence ; Content analysis ; Cues ; Cultivation ; Curriculum ; Education, Nursing, Baccalaureate ; Experts ; Faculty, Nursing - psychology ; Female ; Humans ; Interviews ; Interviews as Topic ; Meaning ; Medical education ; Middle Aged ; Nurse educator ; Nurse tutors ; Nursing ; Nursing competence ; Nursing education ; Nursing Students ; Patient safety ; Patients ; Problem Solving ; Professional practice ; Qualitative Research ; Quality of care ; Selfreflection ; Semi Structured Interviews ; Students, Nursing ; Taiwan</subject><ispartof>Nurse education today, 2018-07, Vol.66, p.110-116</ispartof><rights>2018 Elsevier Ltd</rights><rights>Copyright © 2018 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.</rights><rights>Copyright Elsevier Science Ltd. Jul 2018</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c450t-48edcaee7732c8c1e989bde899a1ffda54196de708b674a6a8aec90bc66fa49c3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c450t-48edcaee7732c8c1e989bde899a1ffda54196de708b674a6a8aec90bc66fa49c3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2018.04.007$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,3538,27906,27907,30981,45977</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29702439$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Huang, Hui-Man</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Huang, Chu-Yu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lee-Hsieh, Jane</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cheng, Su-Fen</creatorcontrib><title>Establishing the competences of clinical reasoning for nursing students in Taiwan: From the nurse educators' perspectives</title><title>Nurse education today</title><addtitle>Nurse Educ Today</addtitle><description>Clinical reasoning is an essential core competence for nurses. Maintaining quality of care and safety of patients results from cultivation of student's clinical reasoning competency. However, the concept of clinical reasoning in nursing students is complex and its meaning and process needs further clarification.
The objectives were to explore the meaning of clinical reasoning competency in Taiwanese nursing students and to operationalize the concept in order to structure a framework illustrating the process of clinical reasoning.
Thirteen seasoned nursing experts who had more than ten years of experience in nursing education or clinical practice participated in the interviews. The interviews were conducted in settings that the participants perceived as convenient, quiet and free of disturbance.
Semi-structured interviews were conducted. The interviews were audio-recorded and field notes were taken. The data were analyzed using Waltz et al.'s (2010) method of content analysis.
The data revealed four domains and 11 competency indicators. The four domains include: awareness of clinical cues, confirmation of clinical problems, determination and implementation of actions, and evaluation and self-reflection. Each domain comprises of 2–4 indicators of clinical reasoning competency. In addition, this study established a framework for cultivation of clinical reasoning competency in nursing students.
The indicators of clinical reasoning competency in nursing students are interwoven, interactive and interdependent to form a dynamic process. The findings of this study may facilitate evaluation of nursing students' clinical reasoning competency and development of instruments to assess clinical reasoning in nursing students.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Clinical Competence</subject><subject>Clinical cue</subject><subject>Clinical decision making</subject><subject>Clinical medicine</subject><subject>Clinical nursing</subject><subject>Clinical reasoning</subject><subject>Competence</subject><subject>Content analysis</subject><subject>Cues</subject><subject>Cultivation</subject><subject>Curriculum</subject><subject>Education, Nursing, Baccalaureate</subject><subject>Experts</subject><subject>Faculty, Nursing - psychology</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Interviews</subject><subject>Interviews as Topic</subject><subject>Meaning</subject><subject>Medical education</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Nurse educator</subject><subject>Nurse tutors</subject><subject>Nursing</subject><subject>Nursing competence</subject><subject>Nursing education</subject><subject>Nursing Students</subject><subject>Patient safety</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>Problem Solving</subject><subject>Professional practice</subject><subject>Qualitative Research</subject><subject>Quality of care</subject><subject>Selfreflection</subject><subject>Semi Structured Interviews</subject><subject>Students, Nursing</subject><subject>Taiwan</subject><issn>0260-6917</issn><issn>1532-2793</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kc1u1TAQRiMEopfCC7BAlljAJmHsJP5BbFDVAlIlNmVtOfaE-iqxg-0U9e1JuIUFC1Yzi_N9Gs2pqpcUGgqUvzs2AV1pGFDZQNcAiEfVgfYtq5lQ7ePqAIxDzRUVZ9WznI8AIAVrn1ZnTAlgXasO1f1lLmaYfL714Tspt0hsnBcsGCxmEkdiJx-8NRNJaHIMOzXGRMKa8r7nsjoMJRMfyI3xP014T65SnH9X7RASdKs1Jab8hiyY8oK2-DvMz6sno5kyvniY59W3q8ubi8_19ddPXy4-Xte266HUnURnDaIQLbPSUlRSDQ6lUoaOozN9RxV3KEAOXHSGG2nQKhgs56PplG3Pq7en3iXFHyvmomefLU6TCRjXrBm0rINWcL6hr_9Bj3FNYbtuo6QUvRTQbxQ7UTbFnBOOekl-NuleU9C7GH3Uuxi9i9HQ6U3MFnr1UL0OM7q_kT8mNuDDCcDtF3cek87W7xacT9vHtIv-f_2_ALgdoZg</recordid><startdate>201807</startdate><enddate>201807</enddate><creator>Huang, Hui-Man</creator><creator>Huang, Chu-Yu</creator><creator>Lee-Hsieh, Jane</creator><creator>Cheng, Su-Fen</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Elsevier Science Ltd</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QJ</scope><scope>ASE</scope><scope>FPQ</scope><scope>K6X</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201807</creationdate><title>Establishing the competences of clinical reasoning for nursing students in Taiwan: From the nurse educators' perspectives</title><author>Huang, Hui-Man ; Huang, Chu-Yu ; Lee-Hsieh, Jane ; Cheng, Su-Fen</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c450t-48edcaee7732c8c1e989bde899a1ffda54196de708b674a6a8aec90bc66fa49c3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Clinical Competence</topic><topic>Clinical cue</topic><topic>Clinical decision making</topic><topic>Clinical medicine</topic><topic>Clinical nursing</topic><topic>Clinical reasoning</topic><topic>Competence</topic><topic>Content analysis</topic><topic>Cues</topic><topic>Cultivation</topic><topic>Curriculum</topic><topic>Education, Nursing, Baccalaureate</topic><topic>Experts</topic><topic>Faculty, Nursing - psychology</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Interviews</topic><topic>Interviews as Topic</topic><topic>Meaning</topic><topic>Medical education</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Nurse educator</topic><topic>Nurse tutors</topic><topic>Nursing</topic><topic>Nursing competence</topic><topic>Nursing education</topic><topic>Nursing Students</topic><topic>Patient safety</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>Problem Solving</topic><topic>Professional practice</topic><topic>Qualitative Research</topic><topic>Quality of care</topic><topic>Selfreflection</topic><topic>Semi Structured Interviews</topic><topic>Students, Nursing</topic><topic>Taiwan</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Huang, Hui-Man</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Huang, Chu-Yu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lee-Hsieh, Jane</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cheng, Su-Fen</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><collection>British Nursing Index</collection><collection>British Nursing Index (BNI) (1985 to Present)</collection><collection>British Nursing Index</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Nurse education today</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Huang, Hui-Man</au><au>Huang, Chu-Yu</au><au>Lee-Hsieh, Jane</au><au>Cheng, Su-Fen</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Establishing the competences of clinical reasoning for nursing students in Taiwan: From the nurse educators' perspectives</atitle><jtitle>Nurse education today</jtitle><addtitle>Nurse Educ Today</addtitle><date>2018-07</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>66</volume><spage>110</spage><epage>116</epage><pages>110-116</pages><issn>0260-6917</issn><eissn>1532-2793</eissn><abstract>Clinical reasoning is an essential core competence for nurses. Maintaining quality of care and safety of patients results from cultivation of student's clinical reasoning competency. However, the concept of clinical reasoning in nursing students is complex and its meaning and process needs further clarification.
The objectives were to explore the meaning of clinical reasoning competency in Taiwanese nursing students and to operationalize the concept in order to structure a framework illustrating the process of clinical reasoning.
Thirteen seasoned nursing experts who had more than ten years of experience in nursing education or clinical practice participated in the interviews. The interviews were conducted in settings that the participants perceived as convenient, quiet and free of disturbance.
Semi-structured interviews were conducted. The interviews were audio-recorded and field notes were taken. The data were analyzed using Waltz et al.'s (2010) method of content analysis.
The data revealed four domains and 11 competency indicators. The four domains include: awareness of clinical cues, confirmation of clinical problems, determination and implementation of actions, and evaluation and self-reflection. Each domain comprises of 2–4 indicators of clinical reasoning competency. In addition, this study established a framework for cultivation of clinical reasoning competency in nursing students.
The indicators of clinical reasoning competency in nursing students are interwoven, interactive and interdependent to form a dynamic process. The findings of this study may facilitate evaluation of nursing students' clinical reasoning competency and development of instruments to assess clinical reasoning in nursing students.</abstract><cop>Scotland</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>29702439</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.nedt.2018.04.007</doi><tpages>7</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0260-6917 |
ispartof | Nurse education today, 2018-07, Vol.66, p.110-116 |
issn | 0260-6917 1532-2793 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2032403766 |
source | MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals; Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA) |
subjects | Adult Clinical Competence Clinical cue Clinical decision making Clinical medicine Clinical nursing Clinical reasoning Competence Content analysis Cues Cultivation Curriculum Education, Nursing, Baccalaureate Experts Faculty, Nursing - psychology Female Humans Interviews Interviews as Topic Meaning Medical education Middle Aged Nurse educator Nurse tutors Nursing Nursing competence Nursing education Nursing Students Patient safety Patients Problem Solving Professional practice Qualitative Research Quality of care Selfreflection Semi Structured Interviews Students, Nursing Taiwan |
title | Establishing the competences of clinical reasoning for nursing students in Taiwan: From the nurse educators' perspectives |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-17T11%3A13%3A15IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Establishing%20the%20competences%20of%20clinical%20reasoning%20for%20nursing%20students%20in%20Taiwan:%20From%20the%20nurse%20educators'%20perspectives&rft.jtitle=Nurse%20education%20today&rft.au=Huang,%20Hui-Man&rft.date=2018-07&rft.volume=66&rft.spage=110&rft.epage=116&rft.pages=110-116&rft.issn=0260-6917&rft.eissn=1532-2793&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.nedt.2018.04.007&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2088758705%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2088758705&rft_id=info:pmid/29702439&rft_els_id=S0260691718301667&rfr_iscdi=true |