Forensic facial comparison in South Africa: State of the science
•Forensic facial comparison is frequently used in South Africa and worldwide.•Here we outline the scope of practice and training in South Africa.•We propose new levels for assessment of agreement.•The reliability of facial comparisons should be addressed in future research. Forensic facial compariso...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Forensic science international 2018-06, Vol.287, p.190-194 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 194 |
---|---|
container_issue | |
container_start_page | 190 |
container_title | Forensic science international |
container_volume | 287 |
creator | Steyn, M. Pretorius, M. Briers, N. Bacci, N. Johnson, A. Houlton, T.M.R. |
description | •Forensic facial comparison is frequently used in South Africa and worldwide.•Here we outline the scope of practice and training in South Africa.•We propose new levels for assessment of agreement.•The reliability of facial comparisons should be addressed in future research.
Forensic facial comparison (FFC) is a scientific technique used to link suspects to a crime scene based on the analysis of photos or video recordings from that scene. While basic guidelines on practice and training are provided by the Facial Identification Scientific Working Group, details of how these are applied across the world are scarce. FFC is frequently used in South Africa, with more than 700 comparisons conducted in the last two years alone. In this paper the standards of practice are outlined, with new proposed levels of agreement/conclusions. We outline three levels of training that were established, with training in facial anatomy, terminology, principles of image comparison, image science, facial recognition and computer skills being aimed at developing general competency. Training in generating court charts and understanding court case proceedings are being specifically developed for the South African context. Various shortcomings still exist, specifically with regard to knowledge of the reliability of the technique. These need to be addressed in future research. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.forsciint.2018.04.006 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2032398354</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0379073818301610</els_id><sourcerecordid>2033240741</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c399t-10bb744cb3269301bc7dd1ca3905f8968f06934e22d5be1da8863379ba3e24ab3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkE1rGzEQhkVJqR23f6EV5NLLbkcfuyvlFBOatGDowe1ZaLWzWMZeOdJuIP8-MnZ8yKWngeGZeV8eQr4xKBmw-se27ENMzvthLDkwVYIsAeoPZM5Uw4uaK3FF5iAaXUAj1Ixcp7QFgKri9Scy47rWSrNqTu4eQsQheUd767zdURf2Bxt9CgP1A12HadzQZR-9s7d0PdoRaejpuEGa03Fw-Jl87O0u4ZfzXJB_Dz__3v8qVn8ef98vV4UTWo8Fg7ZtpHSt4LUWwFrXdB1zVmioeqVr1UPeS-S8q1pknVWqFrl-awVyaVuxIN9Pfw8xPE2YRrP3yeFuZwcMUzIcBBdaiUpm9OYdug1THHK7IyW4hEayTDUnysWQUsTeHKLf2_hiGJijZLM1F8nmKNmANFlyvvx6_j-1e-wud29WM7A8AZiFPHuM5iyr8xHdaLrg_xvyCl9IkBA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2033240741</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Forensic facial comparison in South Africa: State of the science</title><source>ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present)</source><source>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</source><creator>Steyn, M. ; Pretorius, M. ; Briers, N. ; Bacci, N. ; Johnson, A. ; Houlton, T.M.R.</creator><creatorcontrib>Steyn, M. ; Pretorius, M. ; Briers, N. ; Bacci, N. ; Johnson, A. ; Houlton, T.M.R.</creatorcontrib><description>•Forensic facial comparison is frequently used in South Africa and worldwide.•Here we outline the scope of practice and training in South Africa.•We propose new levels for assessment of agreement.•The reliability of facial comparisons should be addressed in future research.
Forensic facial comparison (FFC) is a scientific technique used to link suspects to a crime scene based on the analysis of photos or video recordings from that scene. While basic guidelines on practice and training are provided by the Facial Identification Scientific Working Group, details of how these are applied across the world are scarce. FFC is frequently used in South Africa, with more than 700 comparisons conducted in the last two years alone. In this paper the standards of practice are outlined, with new proposed levels of agreement/conclusions. We outline three levels of training that were established, with training in facial anatomy, terminology, principles of image comparison, image science, facial recognition and computer skills being aimed at developing general competency. Training in generating court charts and understanding court case proceedings are being specifically developed for the South African context. Various shortcomings still exist, specifically with regard to knowledge of the reliability of the technique. These need to be addressed in future research.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0379-0738</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1872-6283</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.forsciint.2018.04.006</identifier><identifier>PMID: 29698915</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Ireland: Elsevier B.V</publisher><subject>Access control ; Automation ; Cameras ; CCTV ; Closed circuit television ; Crime ; Face recognition ; FISWG ; Forensic engineering ; Forensic science ; Forensic sciences ; Identification ; Image analysis ; Morphology ; Object recognition ; Pattern recognition ; Peer review ; Photo comparison ; Quality ; Recording equipment ; Training</subject><ispartof>Forensic science international, 2018-06, Vol.287, p.190-194</ispartof><rights>2018 Elsevier B.V.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2018 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.</rights><rights>Copyright Elsevier Limited Jun 2018</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c399t-10bb744cb3269301bc7dd1ca3905f8968f06934e22d5be1da8863379ba3e24ab3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c399t-10bb744cb3269301bc7dd1ca3905f8968f06934e22d5be1da8863379ba3e24ab3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-8544-6049 ; 0000-0002-0215-9723 ; 0000-0001-6858-7598 ; 0000-0003-1215-0869</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2033240741?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3548,27922,27923,45993,64383,64385,64387,72239</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29698915$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Steyn, M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pretorius, M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Briers, N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bacci, N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Johnson, A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Houlton, T.M.R.</creatorcontrib><title>Forensic facial comparison in South Africa: State of the science</title><title>Forensic science international</title><addtitle>Forensic Sci Int</addtitle><description>•Forensic facial comparison is frequently used in South Africa and worldwide.•Here we outline the scope of practice and training in South Africa.•We propose new levels for assessment of agreement.•The reliability of facial comparisons should be addressed in future research.
Forensic facial comparison (FFC) is a scientific technique used to link suspects to a crime scene based on the analysis of photos or video recordings from that scene. While basic guidelines on practice and training are provided by the Facial Identification Scientific Working Group, details of how these are applied across the world are scarce. FFC is frequently used in South Africa, with more than 700 comparisons conducted in the last two years alone. In this paper the standards of practice are outlined, with new proposed levels of agreement/conclusions. We outline three levels of training that were established, with training in facial anatomy, terminology, principles of image comparison, image science, facial recognition and computer skills being aimed at developing general competency. Training in generating court charts and understanding court case proceedings are being specifically developed for the South African context. Various shortcomings still exist, specifically with regard to knowledge of the reliability of the technique. These need to be addressed in future research.</description><subject>Access control</subject><subject>Automation</subject><subject>Cameras</subject><subject>CCTV</subject><subject>Closed circuit television</subject><subject>Crime</subject><subject>Face recognition</subject><subject>FISWG</subject><subject>Forensic engineering</subject><subject>Forensic science</subject><subject>Forensic sciences</subject><subject>Identification</subject><subject>Image analysis</subject><subject>Morphology</subject><subject>Object recognition</subject><subject>Pattern recognition</subject><subject>Peer review</subject><subject>Photo comparison</subject><subject>Quality</subject><subject>Recording equipment</subject><subject>Training</subject><issn>0379-0738</issn><issn>1872-6283</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkE1rGzEQhkVJqR23f6EV5NLLbkcfuyvlFBOatGDowe1ZaLWzWMZeOdJuIP8-MnZ8yKWngeGZeV8eQr4xKBmw-se27ENMzvthLDkwVYIsAeoPZM5Uw4uaK3FF5iAaXUAj1Ixcp7QFgKri9Scy47rWSrNqTu4eQsQheUd767zdURf2Bxt9CgP1A12HadzQZR-9s7d0PdoRaejpuEGa03Fw-Jl87O0u4ZfzXJB_Dz__3v8qVn8ef98vV4UTWo8Fg7ZtpHSt4LUWwFrXdB1zVmioeqVr1UPeS-S8q1pknVWqFrl-awVyaVuxIN9Pfw8xPE2YRrP3yeFuZwcMUzIcBBdaiUpm9OYdug1THHK7IyW4hEayTDUnysWQUsTeHKLf2_hiGJijZLM1F8nmKNmANFlyvvx6_j-1e-wud29WM7A8AZiFPHuM5iyr8xHdaLrg_xvyCl9IkBA</recordid><startdate>20180601</startdate><enddate>20180601</enddate><creator>Steyn, M.</creator><creator>Pretorius, M.</creator><creator>Briers, N.</creator><creator>Bacci, N.</creator><creator>Johnson, A.</creator><creator>Houlton, T.M.R.</creator><general>Elsevier B.V</general><general>Elsevier Limited</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QP</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7U7</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8544-6049</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0215-9723</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6858-7598</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1215-0869</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20180601</creationdate><title>Forensic facial comparison in South Africa: State of the science</title><author>Steyn, M. ; Pretorius, M. ; Briers, N. ; Bacci, N. ; Johnson, A. ; Houlton, T.M.R.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c399t-10bb744cb3269301bc7dd1ca3905f8968f06934e22d5be1da8863379ba3e24ab3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Access control</topic><topic>Automation</topic><topic>Cameras</topic><topic>CCTV</topic><topic>Closed circuit television</topic><topic>Crime</topic><topic>Face recognition</topic><topic>FISWG</topic><topic>Forensic engineering</topic><topic>Forensic science</topic><topic>Forensic sciences</topic><topic>Identification</topic><topic>Image analysis</topic><topic>Morphology</topic><topic>Object recognition</topic><topic>Pattern recognition</topic><topic>Peer review</topic><topic>Photo comparison</topic><topic>Quality</topic><topic>Recording equipment</topic><topic>Training</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Steyn, M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pretorius, M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Briers, N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bacci, N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Johnson, A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Houlton, T.M.R.</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Calcium & Calcified Tissue Abstracts</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Toxicology Abstracts</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Forensic science international</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Steyn, M.</au><au>Pretorius, M.</au><au>Briers, N.</au><au>Bacci, N.</au><au>Johnson, A.</au><au>Houlton, T.M.R.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Forensic facial comparison in South Africa: State of the science</atitle><jtitle>Forensic science international</jtitle><addtitle>Forensic Sci Int</addtitle><date>2018-06-01</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>287</volume><spage>190</spage><epage>194</epage><pages>190-194</pages><issn>0379-0738</issn><eissn>1872-6283</eissn><abstract>•Forensic facial comparison is frequently used in South Africa and worldwide.•Here we outline the scope of practice and training in South Africa.•We propose new levels for assessment of agreement.•The reliability of facial comparisons should be addressed in future research.
Forensic facial comparison (FFC) is a scientific technique used to link suspects to a crime scene based on the analysis of photos or video recordings from that scene. While basic guidelines on practice and training are provided by the Facial Identification Scientific Working Group, details of how these are applied across the world are scarce. FFC is frequently used in South Africa, with more than 700 comparisons conducted in the last two years alone. In this paper the standards of practice are outlined, with new proposed levels of agreement/conclusions. We outline three levels of training that were established, with training in facial anatomy, terminology, principles of image comparison, image science, facial recognition and computer skills being aimed at developing general competency. Training in generating court charts and understanding court case proceedings are being specifically developed for the South African context. Various shortcomings still exist, specifically with regard to knowledge of the reliability of the technique. These need to be addressed in future research.</abstract><cop>Ireland</cop><pub>Elsevier B.V</pub><pmid>29698915</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.forsciint.2018.04.006</doi><tpages>5</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8544-6049</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0215-9723</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6858-7598</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1215-0869</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0379-0738 |
ispartof | Forensic science international, 2018-06, Vol.287, p.190-194 |
issn | 0379-0738 1872-6283 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2032398354 |
source | ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present); ProQuest Central UK/Ireland |
subjects | Access control Automation Cameras CCTV Closed circuit television Crime Face recognition FISWG Forensic engineering Forensic science Forensic sciences Identification Image analysis Morphology Object recognition Pattern recognition Peer review Photo comparison Quality Recording equipment Training |
title | Forensic facial comparison in South Africa: State of the science |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-14T05%3A29%3A05IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Forensic%20facial%20comparison%20in%20South%20Africa:%20State%20of%20the%20science&rft.jtitle=Forensic%20science%20international&rft.au=Steyn,%20M.&rft.date=2018-06-01&rft.volume=287&rft.spage=190&rft.epage=194&rft.pages=190-194&rft.issn=0379-0738&rft.eissn=1872-6283&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.forsciint.2018.04.006&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2033240741%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2033240741&rft_id=info:pmid/29698915&rft_els_id=S0379073818301610&rfr_iscdi=true |