Forensic facial comparison in South Africa: State of the science

•Forensic facial comparison is frequently used in South Africa and worldwide.•Here we outline the scope of practice and training in South Africa.•We propose new levels for assessment of agreement.•The reliability of facial comparisons should be addressed in future research. Forensic facial compariso...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Forensic science international 2018-06, Vol.287, p.190-194
Hauptverfasser: Steyn, M., Pretorius, M., Briers, N., Bacci, N., Johnson, A., Houlton, T.M.R.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 194
container_issue
container_start_page 190
container_title Forensic science international
container_volume 287
creator Steyn, M.
Pretorius, M.
Briers, N.
Bacci, N.
Johnson, A.
Houlton, T.M.R.
description •Forensic facial comparison is frequently used in South Africa and worldwide.•Here we outline the scope of practice and training in South Africa.•We propose new levels for assessment of agreement.•The reliability of facial comparisons should be addressed in future research. Forensic facial comparison (FFC) is a scientific technique used to link suspects to a crime scene based on the analysis of photos or video recordings from that scene. While basic guidelines on practice and training are provided by the Facial Identification Scientific Working Group, details of how these are applied across the world are scarce. FFC is frequently used in South Africa, with more than 700 comparisons conducted in the last two years alone. In this paper the standards of practice are outlined, with new proposed levels of agreement/conclusions. We outline three levels of training that were established, with training in facial anatomy, terminology, principles of image comparison, image science, facial recognition and computer skills being aimed at developing general competency. Training in generating court charts and understanding court case proceedings are being specifically developed for the South African context. Various shortcomings still exist, specifically with regard to knowledge of the reliability of the technique. These need to be addressed in future research.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.forsciint.2018.04.006
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2032398354</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0379073818301610</els_id><sourcerecordid>2033240741</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c399t-10bb744cb3269301bc7dd1ca3905f8968f06934e22d5be1da8863379ba3e24ab3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkE1rGzEQhkVJqR23f6EV5NLLbkcfuyvlFBOatGDowe1ZaLWzWMZeOdJuIP8-MnZ8yKWngeGZeV8eQr4xKBmw-se27ENMzvthLDkwVYIsAeoPZM5Uw4uaK3FF5iAaXUAj1Ixcp7QFgKri9Scy47rWSrNqTu4eQsQheUd767zdURf2Bxt9CgP1A12HadzQZR-9s7d0PdoRaejpuEGa03Fw-Jl87O0u4ZfzXJB_Dz__3v8qVn8ef98vV4UTWo8Fg7ZtpHSt4LUWwFrXdB1zVmioeqVr1UPeS-S8q1pknVWqFrl-awVyaVuxIN9Pfw8xPE2YRrP3yeFuZwcMUzIcBBdaiUpm9OYdug1THHK7IyW4hEayTDUnysWQUsTeHKLf2_hiGJijZLM1F8nmKNmANFlyvvx6_j-1e-wud29WM7A8AZiFPHuM5iyr8xHdaLrg_xvyCl9IkBA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2033240741</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Forensic facial comparison in South Africa: State of the science</title><source>ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present)</source><source>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</source><creator>Steyn, M. ; Pretorius, M. ; Briers, N. ; Bacci, N. ; Johnson, A. ; Houlton, T.M.R.</creator><creatorcontrib>Steyn, M. ; Pretorius, M. ; Briers, N. ; Bacci, N. ; Johnson, A. ; Houlton, T.M.R.</creatorcontrib><description>•Forensic facial comparison is frequently used in South Africa and worldwide.•Here we outline the scope of practice and training in South Africa.•We propose new levels for assessment of agreement.•The reliability of facial comparisons should be addressed in future research. Forensic facial comparison (FFC) is a scientific technique used to link suspects to a crime scene based on the analysis of photos or video recordings from that scene. While basic guidelines on practice and training are provided by the Facial Identification Scientific Working Group, details of how these are applied across the world are scarce. FFC is frequently used in South Africa, with more than 700 comparisons conducted in the last two years alone. In this paper the standards of practice are outlined, with new proposed levels of agreement/conclusions. We outline three levels of training that were established, with training in facial anatomy, terminology, principles of image comparison, image science, facial recognition and computer skills being aimed at developing general competency. Training in generating court charts and understanding court case proceedings are being specifically developed for the South African context. Various shortcomings still exist, specifically with regard to knowledge of the reliability of the technique. These need to be addressed in future research.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0379-0738</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1872-6283</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.forsciint.2018.04.006</identifier><identifier>PMID: 29698915</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Ireland: Elsevier B.V</publisher><subject>Access control ; Automation ; Cameras ; CCTV ; Closed circuit television ; Crime ; Face recognition ; FISWG ; Forensic engineering ; Forensic science ; Forensic sciences ; Identification ; Image analysis ; Morphology ; Object recognition ; Pattern recognition ; Peer review ; Photo comparison ; Quality ; Recording equipment ; Training</subject><ispartof>Forensic science international, 2018-06, Vol.287, p.190-194</ispartof><rights>2018 Elsevier B.V.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2018 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.</rights><rights>Copyright Elsevier Limited Jun 2018</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c399t-10bb744cb3269301bc7dd1ca3905f8968f06934e22d5be1da8863379ba3e24ab3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c399t-10bb744cb3269301bc7dd1ca3905f8968f06934e22d5be1da8863379ba3e24ab3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-8544-6049 ; 0000-0002-0215-9723 ; 0000-0001-6858-7598 ; 0000-0003-1215-0869</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2033240741?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3548,27922,27923,45993,64383,64385,64387,72239</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29698915$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Steyn, M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pretorius, M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Briers, N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bacci, N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Johnson, A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Houlton, T.M.R.</creatorcontrib><title>Forensic facial comparison in South Africa: State of the science</title><title>Forensic science international</title><addtitle>Forensic Sci Int</addtitle><description>•Forensic facial comparison is frequently used in South Africa and worldwide.•Here we outline the scope of practice and training in South Africa.•We propose new levels for assessment of agreement.•The reliability of facial comparisons should be addressed in future research. Forensic facial comparison (FFC) is a scientific technique used to link suspects to a crime scene based on the analysis of photos or video recordings from that scene. While basic guidelines on practice and training are provided by the Facial Identification Scientific Working Group, details of how these are applied across the world are scarce. FFC is frequently used in South Africa, with more than 700 comparisons conducted in the last two years alone. In this paper the standards of practice are outlined, with new proposed levels of agreement/conclusions. We outline three levels of training that were established, with training in facial anatomy, terminology, principles of image comparison, image science, facial recognition and computer skills being aimed at developing general competency. Training in generating court charts and understanding court case proceedings are being specifically developed for the South African context. Various shortcomings still exist, specifically with regard to knowledge of the reliability of the technique. These need to be addressed in future research.</description><subject>Access control</subject><subject>Automation</subject><subject>Cameras</subject><subject>CCTV</subject><subject>Closed circuit television</subject><subject>Crime</subject><subject>Face recognition</subject><subject>FISWG</subject><subject>Forensic engineering</subject><subject>Forensic science</subject><subject>Forensic sciences</subject><subject>Identification</subject><subject>Image analysis</subject><subject>Morphology</subject><subject>Object recognition</subject><subject>Pattern recognition</subject><subject>Peer review</subject><subject>Photo comparison</subject><subject>Quality</subject><subject>Recording equipment</subject><subject>Training</subject><issn>0379-0738</issn><issn>1872-6283</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkE1rGzEQhkVJqR23f6EV5NLLbkcfuyvlFBOatGDowe1ZaLWzWMZeOdJuIP8-MnZ8yKWngeGZeV8eQr4xKBmw-se27ENMzvthLDkwVYIsAeoPZM5Uw4uaK3FF5iAaXUAj1Ixcp7QFgKri9Scy47rWSrNqTu4eQsQheUd767zdURf2Bxt9CgP1A12HadzQZR-9s7d0PdoRaejpuEGa03Fw-Jl87O0u4ZfzXJB_Dz__3v8qVn8ef98vV4UTWo8Fg7ZtpHSt4LUWwFrXdB1zVmioeqVr1UPeS-S8q1pknVWqFrl-awVyaVuxIN9Pfw8xPE2YRrP3yeFuZwcMUzIcBBdaiUpm9OYdug1THHK7IyW4hEayTDUnysWQUsTeHKLf2_hiGJijZLM1F8nmKNmANFlyvvx6_j-1e-wud29WM7A8AZiFPHuM5iyr8xHdaLrg_xvyCl9IkBA</recordid><startdate>20180601</startdate><enddate>20180601</enddate><creator>Steyn, M.</creator><creator>Pretorius, M.</creator><creator>Briers, N.</creator><creator>Bacci, N.</creator><creator>Johnson, A.</creator><creator>Houlton, T.M.R.</creator><general>Elsevier B.V</general><general>Elsevier Limited</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QP</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7U7</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8544-6049</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0215-9723</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6858-7598</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1215-0869</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20180601</creationdate><title>Forensic facial comparison in South Africa: State of the science</title><author>Steyn, M. ; Pretorius, M. ; Briers, N. ; Bacci, N. ; Johnson, A. ; Houlton, T.M.R.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c399t-10bb744cb3269301bc7dd1ca3905f8968f06934e22d5be1da8863379ba3e24ab3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Access control</topic><topic>Automation</topic><topic>Cameras</topic><topic>CCTV</topic><topic>Closed circuit television</topic><topic>Crime</topic><topic>Face recognition</topic><topic>FISWG</topic><topic>Forensic engineering</topic><topic>Forensic science</topic><topic>Forensic sciences</topic><topic>Identification</topic><topic>Image analysis</topic><topic>Morphology</topic><topic>Object recognition</topic><topic>Pattern recognition</topic><topic>Peer review</topic><topic>Photo comparison</topic><topic>Quality</topic><topic>Recording equipment</topic><topic>Training</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Steyn, M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pretorius, M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Briers, N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bacci, N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Johnson, A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Houlton, T.M.R.</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Calcium &amp; Calcified Tissue Abstracts</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Toxicology Abstracts</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Forensic science international</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Steyn, M.</au><au>Pretorius, M.</au><au>Briers, N.</au><au>Bacci, N.</au><au>Johnson, A.</au><au>Houlton, T.M.R.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Forensic facial comparison in South Africa: State of the science</atitle><jtitle>Forensic science international</jtitle><addtitle>Forensic Sci Int</addtitle><date>2018-06-01</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>287</volume><spage>190</spage><epage>194</epage><pages>190-194</pages><issn>0379-0738</issn><eissn>1872-6283</eissn><abstract>•Forensic facial comparison is frequently used in South Africa and worldwide.•Here we outline the scope of practice and training in South Africa.•We propose new levels for assessment of agreement.•The reliability of facial comparisons should be addressed in future research. Forensic facial comparison (FFC) is a scientific technique used to link suspects to a crime scene based on the analysis of photos or video recordings from that scene. While basic guidelines on practice and training are provided by the Facial Identification Scientific Working Group, details of how these are applied across the world are scarce. FFC is frequently used in South Africa, with more than 700 comparisons conducted in the last two years alone. In this paper the standards of practice are outlined, with new proposed levels of agreement/conclusions. We outline three levels of training that were established, with training in facial anatomy, terminology, principles of image comparison, image science, facial recognition and computer skills being aimed at developing general competency. Training in generating court charts and understanding court case proceedings are being specifically developed for the South African context. Various shortcomings still exist, specifically with regard to knowledge of the reliability of the technique. These need to be addressed in future research.</abstract><cop>Ireland</cop><pub>Elsevier B.V</pub><pmid>29698915</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.forsciint.2018.04.006</doi><tpages>5</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8544-6049</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0215-9723</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6858-7598</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1215-0869</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0379-0738
ispartof Forensic science international, 2018-06, Vol.287, p.190-194
issn 0379-0738
1872-6283
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2032398354
source ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present); ProQuest Central UK/Ireland
subjects Access control
Automation
Cameras
CCTV
Closed circuit television
Crime
Face recognition
FISWG
Forensic engineering
Forensic science
Forensic sciences
Identification
Image analysis
Morphology
Object recognition
Pattern recognition
Peer review
Photo comparison
Quality
Recording equipment
Training
title Forensic facial comparison in South Africa: State of the science
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-14T05%3A29%3A05IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Forensic%20facial%20comparison%20in%20South%20Africa:%20State%20of%20the%20science&rft.jtitle=Forensic%20science%20international&rft.au=Steyn,%20M.&rft.date=2018-06-01&rft.volume=287&rft.spage=190&rft.epage=194&rft.pages=190-194&rft.issn=0379-0738&rft.eissn=1872-6283&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.forsciint.2018.04.006&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2033240741%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2033240741&rft_id=info:pmid/29698915&rft_els_id=S0379073818301610&rfr_iscdi=true