Cattle Gain and Crop Yield for a Dryland Wheat‐Sorghum‐Fallow Rotation

Increasing pumping costs and declining well capacities in the U.S. Southern High Plains have led to greater reliance on less productive and inherently riskier dryland cropping systems. Dryland wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) and grain sorghum [Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench] are typically grown in a 3‐yr...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Agronomy journal 2009-01, Vol.101 (1), p.150-158
Hauptverfasser: Baumhardt, R. L., Schwartz, R. C., Greene, L. W., MacDonald, J. C.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 158
container_issue 1
container_start_page 150
container_title Agronomy journal
container_volume 101
creator Baumhardt, R. L.
Schwartz, R. C.
Greene, L. W.
MacDonald, J. C.
description Increasing pumping costs and declining well capacities in the U.S. Southern High Plains have led to greater reliance on less productive and inherently riskier dryland cropping systems. Dryland wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) and grain sorghum [Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench] are typically grown in a 3‐yr wheat‐sorghum‐fallow (WSF) rotation that may be intensified by integrating cattle (Bos taurus) grazing. Suitability of grazing dryland crops in the WSF rotation has not been evaluated. Our objectives were to quantify (i) cattle gain during limited grazing of dryland wheat and sorghum stover, and (ii) grazing effects on the growth and yield of the grazed wheat and subsequent sorghum crop. We established, concurrently, all WSF rotation phases in duplicate ungrazed and grazed plots in three replicated paddocks on a gently sloping Pullman silty clay loam (fine, mixed, superactive, thermic Torrertic Paleustoll) at the USDA‐ARS, Conservation and Production Research Laboratory, Bushland, TX (35°11′ N, 102°5′ W). Cattle gain, fallow soil water storage, and the growth and yield of wheat and subsequent grain sorghum were compared from 2000 to 2007 within a randomized complete block. Dryland wheat was grazed an average of 31 d during 7 of 8 test years by cattle stocked at 1.7 Mg ha−1 and produced a mean gain of 123 kg ha−1. Wheat grain yield averaged 1.72 Mg ha−1 without grazing and was not different from the 1.57 Mg ha−1 grain yield with grazing. Grazing decreased wheat straw yield, but subsequent soil water storage was unaffected. Sorghum grain yields of 2.26 Mg ha−1 in ungrazed plots were not different from grazed plots averaging 2.20 Mg ha−1. Overall productivity of the WSF cropping system was increased using limited grazing of dryland wheat forage and sorghum stover with no significant reduction in wheat or sorghum grain yields.
doi_str_mv 10.2134/agronj2008.0098
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_20317950</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>20317950</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4208-c421c0147302886f33a92db57d8dd8b4d76c5a2c4b337125fb31492e2071473a3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkM1KAzEUhYMoWKtrt4Ogu2lvfuZvJaXaaikWqiKuQmYm005JJzWZUrrzEXxGn8SMLQpu3Nxcku-ce3MQOsfQIZiyrpgZXS0IQNwBSOID1MKMBj6ELDhELQAgPk5CcoxOrF0AYJww3EKjvqhrJb2hKCtPVLnXN3rlvZZS5V6hjSe8G7NVzcPLXIr68_3jUZvZfL103UAopTfeVNeiLnV1io4Koaw8259t9Dy4ferf-ePJ8L7fG_sZIxA3FWeAWUSBxHFYUCoSkqdBlMd5Hqcsj8IsECRjKaURJkGRUswSIglEjUjQNrra-a6MfltLW_NlaTOp3JZSry0nQHGUBODAiz_gQq9N5Xbj7vMBjR3noO4Oyoy21siCr0y5FGbLMfAmWP4bLG-CdYrLva2wmVCFEVVW2h8ZwZhEhFLHXe-4Tank9j9b3huOSG84nTyMmrvvSV9IkIvd</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>194538317</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Cattle Gain and Crop Yield for a Dryland Wheat‐Sorghum‐Fallow Rotation</title><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><creator>Baumhardt, R. L. ; Schwartz, R. C. ; Greene, L. W. ; MacDonald, J. C.</creator><creatorcontrib>Baumhardt, R. L. ; Schwartz, R. C. ; Greene, L. W. ; MacDonald, J. C.</creatorcontrib><description>Increasing pumping costs and declining well capacities in the U.S. Southern High Plains have led to greater reliance on less productive and inherently riskier dryland cropping systems. Dryland wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) and grain sorghum [Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench] are typically grown in a 3‐yr wheat‐sorghum‐fallow (WSF) rotation that may be intensified by integrating cattle (Bos taurus) grazing. Suitability of grazing dryland crops in the WSF rotation has not been evaluated. Our objectives were to quantify (i) cattle gain during limited grazing of dryland wheat and sorghum stover, and (ii) grazing effects on the growth and yield of the grazed wheat and subsequent sorghum crop. We established, concurrently, all WSF rotation phases in duplicate ungrazed and grazed plots in three replicated paddocks on a gently sloping Pullman silty clay loam (fine, mixed, superactive, thermic Torrertic Paleustoll) at the USDA‐ARS, Conservation and Production Research Laboratory, Bushland, TX (35°11′ N, 102°5′ W). Cattle gain, fallow soil water storage, and the growth and yield of wheat and subsequent grain sorghum were compared from 2000 to 2007 within a randomized complete block. Dryland wheat was grazed an average of 31 d during 7 of 8 test years by cattle stocked at 1.7 Mg ha−1 and produced a mean gain of 123 kg ha−1. Wheat grain yield averaged 1.72 Mg ha−1 without grazing and was not different from the 1.57 Mg ha−1 grain yield with grazing. Grazing decreased wheat straw yield, but subsequent soil water storage was unaffected. Sorghum grain yields of 2.26 Mg ha−1 in ungrazed plots were not different from grazed plots averaging 2.20 Mg ha−1. Overall productivity of the WSF cropping system was increased using limited grazing of dryland wheat forage and sorghum stover with no significant reduction in wheat or sorghum grain yields.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0002-1962</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1435-0645</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.2134/agronj2008.0098</identifier><identifier>CODEN: AGJOAT</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Madison: American Society of Agronomy</publisher><subject>Agronomy. Soil science and plant productions ; Animal productions ; Arid zones ; Biological and medical sciences ; Bos taurus ; Crop yield ; Cropping systems. Cultivation. Soil tillage ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; General agronomy. Plant production ; Generalities. Cropping systems and patterns ; Sorghum ; Sorghum bicolor ; Terrestrial animal productions ; Triticum aestivum ; Vertebrates</subject><ispartof>Agronomy journal, 2009-01, Vol.101 (1), p.150-158</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2009 by the American Society of Agronomy</rights><rights>2009 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright American Society of Agronomy Jan/Feb 2009</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4208-c421c0147302886f33a92db57d8dd8b4d76c5a2c4b337125fb31492e2071473a3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4208-c421c0147302886f33a92db57d8dd8b4d76c5a2c4b337125fb31492e2071473a3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.2134%2Fagronj2008.0098$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.2134%2Fagronj2008.0098$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,27901,27902,45550,45551</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=21127233$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Baumhardt, R. L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schwartz, R. C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Greene, L. W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>MacDonald, J. C.</creatorcontrib><title>Cattle Gain and Crop Yield for a Dryland Wheat‐Sorghum‐Fallow Rotation</title><title>Agronomy journal</title><description>Increasing pumping costs and declining well capacities in the U.S. Southern High Plains have led to greater reliance on less productive and inherently riskier dryland cropping systems. Dryland wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) and grain sorghum [Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench] are typically grown in a 3‐yr wheat‐sorghum‐fallow (WSF) rotation that may be intensified by integrating cattle (Bos taurus) grazing. Suitability of grazing dryland crops in the WSF rotation has not been evaluated. Our objectives were to quantify (i) cattle gain during limited grazing of dryland wheat and sorghum stover, and (ii) grazing effects on the growth and yield of the grazed wheat and subsequent sorghum crop. We established, concurrently, all WSF rotation phases in duplicate ungrazed and grazed plots in three replicated paddocks on a gently sloping Pullman silty clay loam (fine, mixed, superactive, thermic Torrertic Paleustoll) at the USDA‐ARS, Conservation and Production Research Laboratory, Bushland, TX (35°11′ N, 102°5′ W). Cattle gain, fallow soil water storage, and the growth and yield of wheat and subsequent grain sorghum were compared from 2000 to 2007 within a randomized complete block. Dryland wheat was grazed an average of 31 d during 7 of 8 test years by cattle stocked at 1.7 Mg ha−1 and produced a mean gain of 123 kg ha−1. Wheat grain yield averaged 1.72 Mg ha−1 without grazing and was not different from the 1.57 Mg ha−1 grain yield with grazing. Grazing decreased wheat straw yield, but subsequent soil water storage was unaffected. Sorghum grain yields of 2.26 Mg ha−1 in ungrazed plots were not different from grazed plots averaging 2.20 Mg ha−1. Overall productivity of the WSF cropping system was increased using limited grazing of dryland wheat forage and sorghum stover with no significant reduction in wheat or sorghum grain yields.</description><subject>Agronomy. Soil science and plant productions</subject><subject>Animal productions</subject><subject>Arid zones</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Bos taurus</subject><subject>Crop yield</subject><subject>Cropping systems. Cultivation. Soil tillage</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>General agronomy. Plant production</subject><subject>Generalities. Cropping systems and patterns</subject><subject>Sorghum</subject><subject>Sorghum bicolor</subject><subject>Terrestrial animal productions</subject><subject>Triticum aestivum</subject><subject>Vertebrates</subject><issn>0002-1962</issn><issn>1435-0645</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2009</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>BEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkM1KAzEUhYMoWKtrt4Ogu2lvfuZvJaXaaikWqiKuQmYm005JJzWZUrrzEXxGn8SMLQpu3Nxcku-ce3MQOsfQIZiyrpgZXS0IQNwBSOID1MKMBj6ELDhELQAgPk5CcoxOrF0AYJww3EKjvqhrJb2hKCtPVLnXN3rlvZZS5V6hjSe8G7NVzcPLXIr68_3jUZvZfL103UAopTfeVNeiLnV1io4Koaw8259t9Dy4ferf-ePJ8L7fG_sZIxA3FWeAWUSBxHFYUCoSkqdBlMd5Hqcsj8IsECRjKaURJkGRUswSIglEjUjQNrra-a6MfltLW_NlaTOp3JZSry0nQHGUBODAiz_gQq9N5Xbj7vMBjR3noO4Oyoy21siCr0y5FGbLMfAmWP4bLG-CdYrLva2wmVCFEVVW2h8ZwZhEhFLHXe-4Tank9j9b3huOSG84nTyMmrvvSV9IkIvd</recordid><startdate>200901</startdate><enddate>200901</enddate><creator>Baumhardt, R. L.</creator><creator>Schwartz, R. C.</creator><creator>Greene, L. W.</creator><creator>MacDonald, J. C.</creator><general>American Society of Agronomy</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>S0X</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7U6</scope><scope>C1K</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200901</creationdate><title>Cattle Gain and Crop Yield for a Dryland Wheat‐Sorghum‐Fallow Rotation</title><author>Baumhardt, R. L. ; Schwartz, R. C. ; Greene, L. W. ; MacDonald, J. C.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4208-c421c0147302886f33a92db57d8dd8b4d76c5a2c4b337125fb31492e2071473a3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2009</creationdate><topic>Agronomy. Soil science and plant productions</topic><topic>Animal productions</topic><topic>Arid zones</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Bos taurus</topic><topic>Crop yield</topic><topic>Cropping systems. Cultivation. Soil tillage</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>General agronomy. Plant production</topic><topic>Generalities. Cropping systems and patterns</topic><topic>Sorghum</topic><topic>Sorghum bicolor</topic><topic>Terrestrial animal productions</topic><topic>Triticum aestivum</topic><topic>Vertebrates</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Baumhardt, R. L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schwartz, R. C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Greene, L. W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>MacDonald, J. C.</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Materials Science &amp; Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Agricultural &amp; Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>eLibrary</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>SIRS Editorial</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Sustainability Science Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><jtitle>Agronomy journal</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Baumhardt, R. L.</au><au>Schwartz, R. C.</au><au>Greene, L. W.</au><au>MacDonald, J. C.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Cattle Gain and Crop Yield for a Dryland Wheat‐Sorghum‐Fallow Rotation</atitle><jtitle>Agronomy journal</jtitle><date>2009-01</date><risdate>2009</risdate><volume>101</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>150</spage><epage>158</epage><pages>150-158</pages><issn>0002-1962</issn><eissn>1435-0645</eissn><coden>AGJOAT</coden><abstract>Increasing pumping costs and declining well capacities in the U.S. Southern High Plains have led to greater reliance on less productive and inherently riskier dryland cropping systems. Dryland wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) and grain sorghum [Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench] are typically grown in a 3‐yr wheat‐sorghum‐fallow (WSF) rotation that may be intensified by integrating cattle (Bos taurus) grazing. Suitability of grazing dryland crops in the WSF rotation has not been evaluated. Our objectives were to quantify (i) cattle gain during limited grazing of dryland wheat and sorghum stover, and (ii) grazing effects on the growth and yield of the grazed wheat and subsequent sorghum crop. We established, concurrently, all WSF rotation phases in duplicate ungrazed and grazed plots in three replicated paddocks on a gently sloping Pullman silty clay loam (fine, mixed, superactive, thermic Torrertic Paleustoll) at the USDA‐ARS, Conservation and Production Research Laboratory, Bushland, TX (35°11′ N, 102°5′ W). Cattle gain, fallow soil water storage, and the growth and yield of wheat and subsequent grain sorghum were compared from 2000 to 2007 within a randomized complete block. Dryland wheat was grazed an average of 31 d during 7 of 8 test years by cattle stocked at 1.7 Mg ha−1 and produced a mean gain of 123 kg ha−1. Wheat grain yield averaged 1.72 Mg ha−1 without grazing and was not different from the 1.57 Mg ha−1 grain yield with grazing. Grazing decreased wheat straw yield, but subsequent soil water storage was unaffected. Sorghum grain yields of 2.26 Mg ha−1 in ungrazed plots were not different from grazed plots averaging 2.20 Mg ha−1. Overall productivity of the WSF cropping system was increased using limited grazing of dryland wheat forage and sorghum stover with no significant reduction in wheat or sorghum grain yields.</abstract><cop>Madison</cop><pub>American Society of Agronomy</pub><doi>10.2134/agronj2008.0098</doi><tpages>9</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0002-1962
ispartof Agronomy journal, 2009-01, Vol.101 (1), p.150-158
issn 0002-1962
1435-0645
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_20317950
source Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete
subjects Agronomy. Soil science and plant productions
Animal productions
Arid zones
Biological and medical sciences
Bos taurus
Crop yield
Cropping systems. Cultivation. Soil tillage
Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology
General agronomy. Plant production
Generalities. Cropping systems and patterns
Sorghum
Sorghum bicolor
Terrestrial animal productions
Triticum aestivum
Vertebrates
title Cattle Gain and Crop Yield for a Dryland Wheat‐Sorghum‐Fallow Rotation
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-12T13%3A44%3A01IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Cattle%20Gain%20and%20Crop%20Yield%20for%20a%20Dryland%20Wheat%E2%80%90Sorghum%E2%80%90Fallow%20Rotation&rft.jtitle=Agronomy%20journal&rft.au=Baumhardt,%20R.%20L.&rft.date=2009-01&rft.volume=101&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=150&rft.epage=158&rft.pages=150-158&rft.issn=0002-1962&rft.eissn=1435-0645&rft.coden=AGJOAT&rft_id=info:doi/10.2134/agronj2008.0098&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E20317950%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=194538317&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true