Reuse of Woodpecker Cavities in The Breeding and Non-Breeding Seasons in Old Burn Habitats in The Black Hills, South Dakota

Recently, greater attention has been given to the potential keystone interaction between cavity excavators and the community of animals that use cavities. However, most research has focused on avian use of cavities in the breeding season, with little attention given to other cavity using guilds or c...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The American midland naturalist 2008-10, Vol.160 (2), p.413-429
Hauptverfasser: Gentry, Dale J, Vierling, Kerri T
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 429
container_issue 2
container_start_page 413
container_title The American midland naturalist
container_volume 160
creator Gentry, Dale J
Vierling, Kerri T
description Recently, greater attention has been given to the potential keystone interaction between cavity excavators and the community of animals that use cavities. However, most research has focused on avian use of cavities in the breeding season, with little attention given to other cavity using guilds or cavity use during the non-breeding season. Furthermore, most breeding season studies were in unburned forests containing a mix of conifer and deciduous trees with much less attention given to cavity rich post-burn habitats. The objective of this study was to examine cavity use during the breeding and non-breeding seasons in old-burned ponderosa pine forests in the Black Hills, South Dakota. One hundred seventy nine active cavity nests of nine cavity nesting species were monitored between 2002–2005. We examined the contents of each cavity during the breeding season and twice during each non-breeding season (fall, winter, spring) each year. Additionally, we conducted vegetative surveys to determine the microhabitat variables that might influence the occupancy of cavities in the breeding season. Binomial logistic regression with AIC model selection criteria were used to model breeding season cavity reuse for the three most common cavity excavator species, Lewis's Woodpeckers (Melanerpes lewis), Red-headed Woodpeckers (M. erythrocephalus) and Northern Flickers (Colaptes auratus). All three species reused old cavities most recently used by conspecifics for breeding; snag density (dbh > 23 cm) and cavity height consistently influenced reuse of cavities for all three species. In the non-breeding season the cavities of these same three species were all commonly used, but Northern Flicker cavities contained the greatest diversity of secondary cavity users. We speculate that Northern Flicker cavities may have been used more frequently in the non-breeding season because of their lower cavity height compared to other similar sized cavities.
doi_str_mv 10.1674/0003-0031(2008)160[413:ROWCIT]2.0.CO;2
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>gale_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_20292353</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A188422204</galeid><jstor_id>20491400</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>A188422204</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-b539t-fcd7e5925f6241a13e80cf6ed96db540b3ceb979115a303173bffd0d2268ec843</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqdUl2L1DAUDaLgOPoThOCDuGBrvtpp9Gm36zoDiwMzI_sgEtL2djYznWZsUlH886ZWRlb2SUIIuTnn3HvIQSimJKbpTLwhhPAobPqKEZKd0ZR8FpS_XS1v8sXmC4tJnC_fsQdoQiXPIsF49hBNTqTH6Ilzu3CVQooJ-rmC3gG2Nb6xtjpCuYcO5_qb8QYcNi3e3AK-6AAq026xbiv80bbRqbAG7Wz7G7hsKnzRdy2e68J47f-yG13u8dw0jXuN17b3t_hS763XT9GjWjcOnv05p-jT1ftNPo-ulx8W-fl1VCRc-qguqxkkkiV1ygTVlENGyjqFSqZVkQhS8BIKOZOUJpoHhzNe1HVFKsbSDMpM8Cl6OeoeO_u1B-fVwbgSmka3YHunGGGS8YQH4It_gDsbHIXZFONCcpYE_SmKRtBWN6BMW1vf6XILLXS6sS3UJpTPaZYJxhgZusf34MOq4GDKewlndwgB4-G73-reObVYr-5ir0Zs2VnnOqjVsTMH3f1QlKghLWr4eDV8vBrSEmpEhbSoMS2KKaLyZXA3Rc9HoZ3ztjuphB6SCjK4vhzfC2PDzP_b5hc0DNC1</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>234932530</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Reuse of Woodpecker Cavities in The Breeding and Non-Breeding Seasons in Old Burn Habitats in The Black Hills, South Dakota</title><source>Jstor Complete Legacy</source><source>BioOne Complete</source><creator>Gentry, Dale J ; Vierling, Kerri T</creator><creatorcontrib>Gentry, Dale J ; Vierling, Kerri T</creatorcontrib><description>Recently, greater attention has been given to the potential keystone interaction between cavity excavators and the community of animals that use cavities. However, most research has focused on avian use of cavities in the breeding season, with little attention given to other cavity using guilds or cavity use during the non-breeding season. Furthermore, most breeding season studies were in unburned forests containing a mix of conifer and deciduous trees with much less attention given to cavity rich post-burn habitats. The objective of this study was to examine cavity use during the breeding and non-breeding seasons in old-burned ponderosa pine forests in the Black Hills, South Dakota. One hundred seventy nine active cavity nests of nine cavity nesting species were monitored between 2002–2005. We examined the contents of each cavity during the breeding season and twice during each non-breeding season (fall, winter, spring) each year. Additionally, we conducted vegetative surveys to determine the microhabitat variables that might influence the occupancy of cavities in the breeding season. Binomial logistic regression with AIC model selection criteria were used to model breeding season cavity reuse for the three most common cavity excavator species, Lewis's Woodpeckers (Melanerpes lewis), Red-headed Woodpeckers (M. erythrocephalus) and Northern Flickers (Colaptes auratus). All three species reused old cavities most recently used by conspecifics for breeding; snag density (dbh &gt; 23 cm) and cavity height consistently influenced reuse of cavities for all three species. In the non-breeding season the cavities of these same three species were all commonly used, but Northern Flicker cavities contained the greatest diversity of secondary cavity users. We speculate that Northern Flicker cavities may have been used more frequently in the non-breeding season because of their lower cavity height compared to other similar sized cavities.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0003-0031</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1938-4238</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1674/0003-0031(2008)160[413:ROWCIT]2.0.CO;2</identifier><identifier>CODEN: AMNAAF</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>The University of Notre Dame, P.O. Box 369, Notre Dame, IN 46556-0369: American Midland Naturalist</publisher><subject>Animal nesting ; Animal reproduction ; Bird nesting ; Birds ; Breeding ; Breeding seasons ; Colaptes auratus ; Coniferous forests ; Environmental aspects ; Evaluation ; Forest habitats ; Habitat (Ecology) ; Influence ; Melanerpes lewis ; Pinus ponderosa ; s ; Sexual cycle ; Tree cavities ; Trees ; Wildlife habitats ; Woodpeckers</subject><ispartof>The American midland naturalist, 2008-10, Vol.160 (2), p.413-429</ispartof><rights>2008, American Midland Naturalist</rights><rights>Copyright 2008 American Midland Naturalist</rights><rights>COPYRIGHT 2008 University of Notre Dame, Department of Biological Sciences</rights><rights>Copyright American Midland Naturalist Oct 2008</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-b539t-fcd7e5925f6241a13e80cf6ed96db540b3ceb979115a303173bffd0d2268ec843</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-b539t-fcd7e5925f6241a13e80cf6ed96db540b3ceb979115a303173bffd0d2268ec843</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://bioone.org/doi/pdf/10.1674/0003-0031(2008)160[413:ROWCIT]2.0.CO;2$$EPDF$$P50$$Gbioone$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/20491400$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,799,26955,27901,27902,52338,57992,58225</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Gentry, Dale J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vierling, Kerri T</creatorcontrib><title>Reuse of Woodpecker Cavities in The Breeding and Non-Breeding Seasons in Old Burn Habitats in The Black Hills, South Dakota</title><title>The American midland naturalist</title><description>Recently, greater attention has been given to the potential keystone interaction between cavity excavators and the community of animals that use cavities. However, most research has focused on avian use of cavities in the breeding season, with little attention given to other cavity using guilds or cavity use during the non-breeding season. Furthermore, most breeding season studies were in unburned forests containing a mix of conifer and deciduous trees with much less attention given to cavity rich post-burn habitats. The objective of this study was to examine cavity use during the breeding and non-breeding seasons in old-burned ponderosa pine forests in the Black Hills, South Dakota. One hundred seventy nine active cavity nests of nine cavity nesting species were monitored between 2002–2005. We examined the contents of each cavity during the breeding season and twice during each non-breeding season (fall, winter, spring) each year. Additionally, we conducted vegetative surveys to determine the microhabitat variables that might influence the occupancy of cavities in the breeding season. Binomial logistic regression with AIC model selection criteria were used to model breeding season cavity reuse for the three most common cavity excavator species, Lewis's Woodpeckers (Melanerpes lewis), Red-headed Woodpeckers (M. erythrocephalus) and Northern Flickers (Colaptes auratus). All three species reused old cavities most recently used by conspecifics for breeding; snag density (dbh &gt; 23 cm) and cavity height consistently influenced reuse of cavities for all three species. In the non-breeding season the cavities of these same three species were all commonly used, but Northern Flicker cavities contained the greatest diversity of secondary cavity users. We speculate that Northern Flicker cavities may have been used more frequently in the non-breeding season because of their lower cavity height compared to other similar sized cavities.</description><subject>Animal nesting</subject><subject>Animal reproduction</subject><subject>Bird nesting</subject><subject>Birds</subject><subject>Breeding</subject><subject>Breeding seasons</subject><subject>Colaptes auratus</subject><subject>Coniferous forests</subject><subject>Environmental aspects</subject><subject>Evaluation</subject><subject>Forest habitats</subject><subject>Habitat (Ecology)</subject><subject>Influence</subject><subject>Melanerpes lewis</subject><subject>Pinus ponderosa</subject><subject>s</subject><subject>Sexual cycle</subject><subject>Tree cavities</subject><subject>Trees</subject><subject>Wildlife habitats</subject><subject>Woodpeckers</subject><issn>0003-0031</issn><issn>1938-4238</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2008</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>BEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNqdUl2L1DAUDaLgOPoThOCDuGBrvtpp9Gm36zoDiwMzI_sgEtL2djYznWZsUlH886ZWRlb2SUIIuTnn3HvIQSimJKbpTLwhhPAobPqKEZKd0ZR8FpS_XS1v8sXmC4tJnC_fsQdoQiXPIsF49hBNTqTH6Ilzu3CVQooJ-rmC3gG2Nb6xtjpCuYcO5_qb8QYcNi3e3AK-6AAq026xbiv80bbRqbAG7Wz7G7hsKnzRdy2e68J47f-yG13u8dw0jXuN17b3t_hS763XT9GjWjcOnv05p-jT1ftNPo-ulx8W-fl1VCRc-qguqxkkkiV1ygTVlENGyjqFSqZVkQhS8BIKOZOUJpoHhzNe1HVFKsbSDMpM8Cl6OeoeO_u1B-fVwbgSmka3YHunGGGS8YQH4It_gDsbHIXZFONCcpYE_SmKRtBWN6BMW1vf6XILLXS6sS3UJpTPaZYJxhgZusf34MOq4GDKewlndwgB4-G73-reObVYr-5ir0Zs2VnnOqjVsTMH3f1QlKghLWr4eDV8vBrSEmpEhbSoMS2KKaLyZXA3Rc9HoZ3ztjuphB6SCjK4vhzfC2PDzP_b5hc0DNC1</recordid><startdate>200810</startdate><enddate>200810</enddate><creator>Gentry, Dale J</creator><creator>Vierling, Kerri T</creator><general>American Midland Naturalist</general><general>University of Notre Dame</general><general>University of Notre Dame, Department of Biological Sciences</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>ISR</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>4T-</scope><scope>4U-</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88A</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8AF</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>BKSAR</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PADUT</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PCBAR</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>S0X</scope><scope>SOI</scope><scope>7U6</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200810</creationdate><title>Reuse of Woodpecker Cavities in The Breeding and Non-Breeding Seasons in Old Burn Habitats in The Black Hills, South Dakota</title><author>Gentry, Dale J ; Vierling, Kerri T</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-b539t-fcd7e5925f6241a13e80cf6ed96db540b3ceb979115a303173bffd0d2268ec843</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2008</creationdate><topic>Animal nesting</topic><topic>Animal reproduction</topic><topic>Bird nesting</topic><topic>Birds</topic><topic>Breeding</topic><topic>Breeding seasons</topic><topic>Colaptes auratus</topic><topic>Coniferous forests</topic><topic>Environmental aspects</topic><topic>Evaluation</topic><topic>Forest habitats</topic><topic>Habitat (Ecology)</topic><topic>Influence</topic><topic>Melanerpes lewis</topic><topic>Pinus ponderosa</topic><topic>s</topic><topic>Sexual cycle</topic><topic>Tree cavities</topic><topic>Trees</topic><topic>Wildlife habitats</topic><topic>Woodpeckers</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Gentry, Dale J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vierling, Kerri T</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Science</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Docstoc</collection><collection>University Readers</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Biology Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>STEM Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Agricultural &amp; Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>eLibrary</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric &amp; Aquatic Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Research Library China</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric &amp; Aquatic Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>SIRS Editorial</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Sustainability Science Abstracts</collection><jtitle>The American midland naturalist</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Gentry, Dale J</au><au>Vierling, Kerri T</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Reuse of Woodpecker Cavities in The Breeding and Non-Breeding Seasons in Old Burn Habitats in The Black Hills, South Dakota</atitle><jtitle>The American midland naturalist</jtitle><date>2008-10</date><risdate>2008</risdate><volume>160</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>413</spage><epage>429</epage><pages>413-429</pages><issn>0003-0031</issn><eissn>1938-4238</eissn><coden>AMNAAF</coden><abstract>Recently, greater attention has been given to the potential keystone interaction between cavity excavators and the community of animals that use cavities. However, most research has focused on avian use of cavities in the breeding season, with little attention given to other cavity using guilds or cavity use during the non-breeding season. Furthermore, most breeding season studies were in unburned forests containing a mix of conifer and deciduous trees with much less attention given to cavity rich post-burn habitats. The objective of this study was to examine cavity use during the breeding and non-breeding seasons in old-burned ponderosa pine forests in the Black Hills, South Dakota. One hundred seventy nine active cavity nests of nine cavity nesting species were monitored between 2002–2005. We examined the contents of each cavity during the breeding season and twice during each non-breeding season (fall, winter, spring) each year. Additionally, we conducted vegetative surveys to determine the microhabitat variables that might influence the occupancy of cavities in the breeding season. Binomial logistic regression with AIC model selection criteria were used to model breeding season cavity reuse for the three most common cavity excavator species, Lewis's Woodpeckers (Melanerpes lewis), Red-headed Woodpeckers (M. erythrocephalus) and Northern Flickers (Colaptes auratus). All three species reused old cavities most recently used by conspecifics for breeding; snag density (dbh &gt; 23 cm) and cavity height consistently influenced reuse of cavities for all three species. In the non-breeding season the cavities of these same three species were all commonly used, but Northern Flicker cavities contained the greatest diversity of secondary cavity users. We speculate that Northern Flicker cavities may have been used more frequently in the non-breeding season because of their lower cavity height compared to other similar sized cavities.</abstract><cop>The University of Notre Dame, P.O. Box 369, Notre Dame, IN 46556-0369</cop><pub>American Midland Naturalist</pub><doi>10.1674/0003-0031(2008)160[413:ROWCIT]2.0.CO;2</doi><tpages>17</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0003-0031
ispartof The American midland naturalist, 2008-10, Vol.160 (2), p.413-429
issn 0003-0031
1938-4238
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_20292353
source Jstor Complete Legacy; BioOne Complete
subjects Animal nesting
Animal reproduction
Bird nesting
Birds
Breeding
Breeding seasons
Colaptes auratus
Coniferous forests
Environmental aspects
Evaluation
Forest habitats
Habitat (Ecology)
Influence
Melanerpes lewis
Pinus ponderosa
s
Sexual cycle
Tree cavities
Trees
Wildlife habitats
Woodpeckers
title Reuse of Woodpecker Cavities in The Breeding and Non-Breeding Seasons in Old Burn Habitats in The Black Hills, South Dakota
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-10T10%3A26%3A00IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Reuse%20of%20Woodpecker%20Cavities%20in%20The%20Breeding%20and%20Non-Breeding%20Seasons%20in%20Old%20Burn%20Habitats%20in%20The%20Black%20Hills,%20South%20Dakota&rft.jtitle=The%20American%20midland%20naturalist&rft.au=Gentry,%20Dale%20J&rft.date=2008-10&rft.volume=160&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=413&rft.epage=429&rft.pages=413-429&rft.issn=0003-0031&rft.eissn=1938-4238&rft.coden=AMNAAF&rft_id=info:doi/10.1674/0003-0031(2008)160%5B413:ROWCIT%5D2.0.CO;2&rft_dat=%3Cgale_proqu%3EA188422204%3C/gale_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=234932530&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_galeid=A188422204&rft_jstor_id=20491400&rfr_iscdi=true