Land Application of Sugar Beet By-products: Effects on Runoff and Percolating Water Quality

Water quality concerns, including greater potential for nutrient transport to surface waters resulting in eutrophication and nutrient leaching to ground water, exist when agricultural or food processing industry wastes and by-products are land applied. Plot- and field-scale studies were conducted to...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of environmental quality 2009-01, Vol.38 (1), p.329-336
Hauptverfasser: Kumar, Kuldip, Rosen, Carl J, Gupta, Satish C, McNearney, Matthew
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 336
container_issue 1
container_start_page 329
container_title Journal of environmental quality
container_volume 38
creator Kumar, Kuldip
Rosen, Carl J
Gupta, Satish C
McNearney, Matthew
description Water quality concerns, including greater potential for nutrient transport to surface waters resulting in eutrophication and nutrient leaching to ground water, exist when agricultural or food processing industry wastes and by-products are land applied. Plot- and field-scale studies were conducted to evaluate the effects of sugar beet by-products on NO3-N and P losses and biochemical oxygen demand (BOD) in runoff and NO3-N concentrations in percolating waters. In the runoff plot study, treatments in the first year included two rates (224 and 448 Mg ha-1 fresh weight) of pulp and spoiled beets and a nonfertilized control. In the second year, no by-products were applied on the treated plots, the control treatment was fertilized with N fertilizer, and an additional treatment was added as a nonfertilized control in buffer areas. Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) was grown in the year of by-product application and sugar beet (Beta vulgaris L.) in the following year. In the percolation field study, the treatments were the control, pulp (224 Mg ha-1), and spoiled beets (224 Mg ha-1). Results from the runoff plot showed that both by-products caused immobilization of soil inorganic N and thus reduced NO3-N losses in runoff and soil waters during the first growing season. There was some risk of NO3-N exceeding the drinking water limit of 10 mg L-1, especially between the period of wheat harvest and soil freezing in fall when pulp was applied at 448 Mg ha-1. The field-scale study showed that by-product application at 224 Mg ha-1 did not result in increased ground water NO3-N concentrations. Application of spoiled beets at both rates caused significantly higher BODs in runoff in the first year of application. The concentrations of total and soluble reactive P (SRP) were also higher from both rates of spoiled beet application and from the higher application rate of pulp during the 2-yr study period. These high BODs and total P and SRP concentrations in runoff waters from land application of sugar beet by-product suggest that application rates should not be higher than 224 Mg ha-1. Best management practices that prevent runoff from entering surface waters directly from these fields are warranted.
doi_str_mv 10.2134/jeq2008.0006
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_20286635</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2044339601</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4536-812a6189428caab326db6edc965fe7ba0d7fee58a31a86a8e2cc721d3db09f263</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kEtr3DAUhUVpSKZJdl23oouu6lQPW5azS8I0DwaaR0MXXYhr-Wrw4LEmkk2Zfx8NYwh00cXVvYjvHA6HkI-cnQku8-8rfBGM6TPGmHpHZryQZSbS857MGMvTnYviiHyIccUYF6xUh-SIVzznWsgZ-bOAvqEXm03XWhha31Pv6NO4hEAvEQd6uc02wTejHeI5nTuH6aCJehx77xzdie8xWN8lcb-kv2HAQB9G6Nphe0IOHHQRT6d9TJ5_zH9d3WSLn9e3VxeLzOaFVJnmAhTXVS60BailUE2tsLGVKhyWNbCmdIiFBslBK9AorC0Fb2RTs8oJJY_J171vSvoyYhzMuo0Wuw569GM0ggmtlCwS-OUfcOXH0KdsRuZlqqdQZYK-7SEbfIwBndmEdg1hazgzu8bN1LjZNZ7wT5PnWK-xeYOnihNQ7YG_bYfb_5qZu_mD2E36mMw_77UOvIFlaKN5fhKMyxS14kpx-QpXE5Ui</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>347001567</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Land Application of Sugar Beet By-products: Effects on Runoff and Percolating Water Quality</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><creator>Kumar, Kuldip ; Rosen, Carl J ; Gupta, Satish C ; McNearney, Matthew</creator><creatorcontrib>Kumar, Kuldip ; Rosen, Carl J ; Gupta, Satish C ; McNearney, Matthew</creatorcontrib><description>Water quality concerns, including greater potential for nutrient transport to surface waters resulting in eutrophication and nutrient leaching to ground water, exist when agricultural or food processing industry wastes and by-products are land applied. Plot- and field-scale studies were conducted to evaluate the effects of sugar beet by-products on NO3-N and P losses and biochemical oxygen demand (BOD) in runoff and NO3-N concentrations in percolating waters. In the runoff plot study, treatments in the first year included two rates (224 and 448 Mg ha-1 fresh weight) of pulp and spoiled beets and a nonfertilized control. In the second year, no by-products were applied on the treated plots, the control treatment was fertilized with N fertilizer, and an additional treatment was added as a nonfertilized control in buffer areas. Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) was grown in the year of by-product application and sugar beet (Beta vulgaris L.) in the following year. In the percolation field study, the treatments were the control, pulp (224 Mg ha-1), and spoiled beets (224 Mg ha-1). Results from the runoff plot showed that both by-products caused immobilization of soil inorganic N and thus reduced NO3-N losses in runoff and soil waters during the first growing season. There was some risk of NO3-N exceeding the drinking water limit of 10 mg L-1, especially between the period of wheat harvest and soil freezing in fall when pulp was applied at 448 Mg ha-1. The field-scale study showed that by-product application at 224 Mg ha-1 did not result in increased ground water NO3-N concentrations. Application of spoiled beets at both rates caused significantly higher BODs in runoff in the first year of application. The concentrations of total and soluble reactive P (SRP) were also higher from both rates of spoiled beet application and from the higher application rate of pulp during the 2-yr study period. These high BODs and total P and SRP concentrations in runoff waters from land application of sugar beet by-product suggest that application rates should not be higher than 224 Mg ha-1. Best management practices that prevent runoff from entering surface waters directly from these fields are warranted.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0047-2425</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1537-2537</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.2134/jeq2008.0006</identifier><identifier>PMID: 19141823</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JEVQAA</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Madison: American Society of Agronomy, Crop Science Society of America, Soil Science Society</publisher><subject>agricultural runoff ; application rate ; autumn ; beet pulp ; best management practices ; Beta vulgaris ; Biochemical oxygen demand ; Byproducts ; cropping sequence ; Drinking water ; Eutrophication ; Fertilizers - analysis ; Food processing industry ; food processing wastes ; Food waste ; Freezing ; Garbage ; Groundwater ; Growing season ; immobilization in soil ; Industrial wastes ; land application ; Leaching ; losses from soil ; nitrate nitrogen ; Nitrates - analysis ; nitrogen ; Nitrogen - analysis ; Nutrient transport ; Percolating water ; phosphorus ; Phosphorus - analysis ; Runoff ; Runoff plot ; soil water ; Soils ; Studies ; Sugar ; sugar beet ; Surface water ; Triticum aestivum ; waste utilization ; Water - analysis ; Water - standards ; Water Pollutants, Chemical - analysis ; water pollution ; Water Pollution, Chemical - analysis ; Water quality ; water quality standards ; Wheat</subject><ispartof>Journal of environmental quality, 2009-01, Vol.38 (1), p.329-336</ispartof><rights>American Society of Agronomy, Crop Science Society of America, and Soil Science Society of America</rights><rights>Copyright American Society of Agronomy Jan/Feb 2009</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4536-812a6189428caab326db6edc965fe7ba0d7fee58a31a86a8e2cc721d3db09f263</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4536-812a6189428caab326db6edc965fe7ba0d7fee58a31a86a8e2cc721d3db09f263</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.2134%2Fjeq2008.0006$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.2134%2Fjeq2008.0006$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,27903,27904,45553,45554</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19141823$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Kumar, Kuldip</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rosen, Carl J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gupta, Satish C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McNearney, Matthew</creatorcontrib><title>Land Application of Sugar Beet By-products: Effects on Runoff and Percolating Water Quality</title><title>Journal of environmental quality</title><addtitle>J Environ Qual</addtitle><description>Water quality concerns, including greater potential for nutrient transport to surface waters resulting in eutrophication and nutrient leaching to ground water, exist when agricultural or food processing industry wastes and by-products are land applied. Plot- and field-scale studies were conducted to evaluate the effects of sugar beet by-products on NO3-N and P losses and biochemical oxygen demand (BOD) in runoff and NO3-N concentrations in percolating waters. In the runoff plot study, treatments in the first year included two rates (224 and 448 Mg ha-1 fresh weight) of pulp and spoiled beets and a nonfertilized control. In the second year, no by-products were applied on the treated plots, the control treatment was fertilized with N fertilizer, and an additional treatment was added as a nonfertilized control in buffer areas. Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) was grown in the year of by-product application and sugar beet (Beta vulgaris L.) in the following year. In the percolation field study, the treatments were the control, pulp (224 Mg ha-1), and spoiled beets (224 Mg ha-1). Results from the runoff plot showed that both by-products caused immobilization of soil inorganic N and thus reduced NO3-N losses in runoff and soil waters during the first growing season. There was some risk of NO3-N exceeding the drinking water limit of 10 mg L-1, especially between the period of wheat harvest and soil freezing in fall when pulp was applied at 448 Mg ha-1. The field-scale study showed that by-product application at 224 Mg ha-1 did not result in increased ground water NO3-N concentrations. Application of spoiled beets at both rates caused significantly higher BODs in runoff in the first year of application. The concentrations of total and soluble reactive P (SRP) were also higher from both rates of spoiled beet application and from the higher application rate of pulp during the 2-yr study period. These high BODs and total P and SRP concentrations in runoff waters from land application of sugar beet by-product suggest that application rates should not be higher than 224 Mg ha-1. Best management practices that prevent runoff from entering surface waters directly from these fields are warranted.</description><subject>agricultural runoff</subject><subject>application rate</subject><subject>autumn</subject><subject>beet pulp</subject><subject>best management practices</subject><subject>Beta vulgaris</subject><subject>Biochemical oxygen demand</subject><subject>Byproducts</subject><subject>cropping sequence</subject><subject>Drinking water</subject><subject>Eutrophication</subject><subject>Fertilizers - analysis</subject><subject>Food processing industry</subject><subject>food processing wastes</subject><subject>Food waste</subject><subject>Freezing</subject><subject>Garbage</subject><subject>Groundwater</subject><subject>Growing season</subject><subject>immobilization in soil</subject><subject>Industrial wastes</subject><subject>land application</subject><subject>Leaching</subject><subject>losses from soil</subject><subject>nitrate nitrogen</subject><subject>Nitrates - analysis</subject><subject>nitrogen</subject><subject>Nitrogen - analysis</subject><subject>Nutrient transport</subject><subject>Percolating water</subject><subject>phosphorus</subject><subject>Phosphorus - analysis</subject><subject>Runoff</subject><subject>Runoff plot</subject><subject>soil water</subject><subject>Soils</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Sugar</subject><subject>sugar beet</subject><subject>Surface water</subject><subject>Triticum aestivum</subject><subject>waste utilization</subject><subject>Water - analysis</subject><subject>Water - standards</subject><subject>Water Pollutants, Chemical - analysis</subject><subject>water pollution</subject><subject>Water Pollution, Chemical - analysis</subject><subject>Water quality</subject><subject>water quality standards</subject><subject>Wheat</subject><issn>0047-2425</issn><issn>1537-2537</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2009</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kEtr3DAUhUVpSKZJdl23oouu6lQPW5azS8I0DwaaR0MXXYhr-Wrw4LEmkk2Zfx8NYwh00cXVvYjvHA6HkI-cnQku8-8rfBGM6TPGmHpHZryQZSbS857MGMvTnYviiHyIccUYF6xUh-SIVzznWsgZ-bOAvqEXm03XWhha31Pv6NO4hEAvEQd6uc02wTejHeI5nTuH6aCJehx77xzdie8xWN8lcb-kv2HAQB9G6Nphe0IOHHQRT6d9TJ5_zH9d3WSLn9e3VxeLzOaFVJnmAhTXVS60BailUE2tsLGVKhyWNbCmdIiFBslBK9AorC0Fb2RTs8oJJY_J171vSvoyYhzMuo0Wuw569GM0ggmtlCwS-OUfcOXH0KdsRuZlqqdQZYK-7SEbfIwBndmEdg1hazgzu8bN1LjZNZ7wT5PnWK-xeYOnihNQ7YG_bYfb_5qZu_mD2E36mMw_77UOvIFlaKN5fhKMyxS14kpx-QpXE5Ui</recordid><startdate>200901</startdate><enddate>200901</enddate><creator>Kumar, Kuldip</creator><creator>Rosen, Carl J</creator><creator>Gupta, Satish C</creator><creator>McNearney, Matthew</creator><general>American Society of Agronomy, Crop Science Society of America, Soil Science Society</general><general>American Society of Agronomy</general><scope>FBQ</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8AF</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>S0X</scope><scope>SOI</scope><scope>7QH</scope><scope>7TV</scope><scope>7U1</scope><scope>7U2</scope><scope>7U6</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>H97</scope><scope>L.G</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200901</creationdate><title>Land Application of Sugar Beet By-products: Effects on Runoff and Percolating Water Quality</title><author>Kumar, Kuldip ; Rosen, Carl J ; Gupta, Satish C ; McNearney, Matthew</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4536-812a6189428caab326db6edc965fe7ba0d7fee58a31a86a8e2cc721d3db09f263</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2009</creationdate><topic>agricultural runoff</topic><topic>application rate</topic><topic>autumn</topic><topic>beet pulp</topic><topic>best management practices</topic><topic>Beta vulgaris</topic><topic>Biochemical oxygen demand</topic><topic>Byproducts</topic><topic>cropping sequence</topic><topic>Drinking water</topic><topic>Eutrophication</topic><topic>Fertilizers - analysis</topic><topic>Food processing industry</topic><topic>food processing wastes</topic><topic>Food waste</topic><topic>Freezing</topic><topic>Garbage</topic><topic>Groundwater</topic><topic>Growing season</topic><topic>immobilization in soil</topic><topic>Industrial wastes</topic><topic>land application</topic><topic>Leaching</topic><topic>losses from soil</topic><topic>nitrate nitrogen</topic><topic>Nitrates - analysis</topic><topic>nitrogen</topic><topic>Nitrogen - analysis</topic><topic>Nutrient transport</topic><topic>Percolating water</topic><topic>phosphorus</topic><topic>Phosphorus - analysis</topic><topic>Runoff</topic><topic>Runoff plot</topic><topic>soil water</topic><topic>Soils</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Sugar</topic><topic>sugar beet</topic><topic>Surface water</topic><topic>Triticum aestivum</topic><topic>waste utilization</topic><topic>Water - analysis</topic><topic>Water - standards</topic><topic>Water Pollutants, Chemical - analysis</topic><topic>water pollution</topic><topic>Water Pollution, Chemical - analysis</topic><topic>Water quality</topic><topic>water quality standards</topic><topic>Wheat</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Kumar, Kuldip</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rosen, Carl J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gupta, Satish C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McNearney, Matthew</creatorcontrib><collection>AGRIS</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>STEM Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Materials Science &amp; Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Agricultural &amp; Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>eLibrary</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Database</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>SIRS Editorial</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Aqualine</collection><collection>Pollution Abstracts</collection><collection>Risk Abstracts</collection><collection>Safety Science and Risk</collection><collection>Sustainability Science Abstracts</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 3: Aquatic Pollution &amp; Environmental Quality</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><jtitle>Journal of environmental quality</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Kumar, Kuldip</au><au>Rosen, Carl J</au><au>Gupta, Satish C</au><au>McNearney, Matthew</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Land Application of Sugar Beet By-products: Effects on Runoff and Percolating Water Quality</atitle><jtitle>Journal of environmental quality</jtitle><addtitle>J Environ Qual</addtitle><date>2009-01</date><risdate>2009</risdate><volume>38</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>329</spage><epage>336</epage><pages>329-336</pages><issn>0047-2425</issn><eissn>1537-2537</eissn><coden>JEVQAA</coden><abstract>Water quality concerns, including greater potential for nutrient transport to surface waters resulting in eutrophication and nutrient leaching to ground water, exist when agricultural or food processing industry wastes and by-products are land applied. Plot- and field-scale studies were conducted to evaluate the effects of sugar beet by-products on NO3-N and P losses and biochemical oxygen demand (BOD) in runoff and NO3-N concentrations in percolating waters. In the runoff plot study, treatments in the first year included two rates (224 and 448 Mg ha-1 fresh weight) of pulp and spoiled beets and a nonfertilized control. In the second year, no by-products were applied on the treated plots, the control treatment was fertilized with N fertilizer, and an additional treatment was added as a nonfertilized control in buffer areas. Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) was grown in the year of by-product application and sugar beet (Beta vulgaris L.) in the following year. In the percolation field study, the treatments were the control, pulp (224 Mg ha-1), and spoiled beets (224 Mg ha-1). Results from the runoff plot showed that both by-products caused immobilization of soil inorganic N and thus reduced NO3-N losses in runoff and soil waters during the first growing season. There was some risk of NO3-N exceeding the drinking water limit of 10 mg L-1, especially between the period of wheat harvest and soil freezing in fall when pulp was applied at 448 Mg ha-1. The field-scale study showed that by-product application at 224 Mg ha-1 did not result in increased ground water NO3-N concentrations. Application of spoiled beets at both rates caused significantly higher BODs in runoff in the first year of application. The concentrations of total and soluble reactive P (SRP) were also higher from both rates of spoiled beet application and from the higher application rate of pulp during the 2-yr study period. These high BODs and total P and SRP concentrations in runoff waters from land application of sugar beet by-product suggest that application rates should not be higher than 224 Mg ha-1. Best management practices that prevent runoff from entering surface waters directly from these fields are warranted.</abstract><cop>Madison</cop><pub>American Society of Agronomy, Crop Science Society of America, Soil Science Society</pub><pmid>19141823</pmid><doi>10.2134/jeq2008.0006</doi><tpages>8</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0047-2425
ispartof Journal of environmental quality, 2009-01, Vol.38 (1), p.329-336
issn 0047-2425
1537-2537
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_20286635
source MEDLINE; Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete
subjects agricultural runoff
application rate
autumn
beet pulp
best management practices
Beta vulgaris
Biochemical oxygen demand
Byproducts
cropping sequence
Drinking water
Eutrophication
Fertilizers - analysis
Food processing industry
food processing wastes
Food waste
Freezing
Garbage
Groundwater
Growing season
immobilization in soil
Industrial wastes
land application
Leaching
losses from soil
nitrate nitrogen
Nitrates - analysis
nitrogen
Nitrogen - analysis
Nutrient transport
Percolating water
phosphorus
Phosphorus - analysis
Runoff
Runoff plot
soil water
Soils
Studies
Sugar
sugar beet
Surface water
Triticum aestivum
waste utilization
Water - analysis
Water - standards
Water Pollutants, Chemical - analysis
water pollution
Water Pollution, Chemical - analysis
Water quality
water quality standards
Wheat
title Land Application of Sugar Beet By-products: Effects on Runoff and Percolating Water Quality
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-25T18%3A02%3A35IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Land%20Application%20of%20Sugar%20Beet%20By-products:%20Effects%20on%20Runoff%20and%20Percolating%20Water%20Quality&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20environmental%20quality&rft.au=Kumar,%20Kuldip&rft.date=2009-01&rft.volume=38&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=329&rft.epage=336&rft.pages=329-336&rft.issn=0047-2425&rft.eissn=1537-2537&rft.coden=JEVQAA&rft_id=info:doi/10.2134/jeq2008.0006&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2044339601%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=347001567&rft_id=info:pmid/19141823&rfr_iscdi=true