Cauliflower-like Neoplasm of Duodenal Papilla in a Liver Transplant Recipient: What Should We Think and Do? A Case Report

With the continuous improvement of liver transplantation technology, the survival rate of liver transplantation has been improved, but recurrent or de novo malignancy remains one of the major factors affecting the long-term survival of liver transplant recipients. A 45-year-old Chinese man had a pla...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Transplantation proceedings 2018-04, Vol.50 (3), p.925-929
Hauptverfasser: Wan, D.-L., Li, M.-X., Bao, L., Zhang, L.-L., Zhang, L., Chen, Q.-Y., Lin, S.-Z.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 929
container_issue 3
container_start_page 925
container_title Transplantation proceedings
container_volume 50
creator Wan, D.-L.
Li, M.-X.
Bao, L.
Zhang, L.-L.
Zhang, L.
Chen, Q.-Y.
Lin, S.-Z.
description With the continuous improvement of liver transplantation technology, the survival rate of liver transplantation has been improved, but recurrent or de novo malignancy remains one of the major factors affecting the long-term survival of liver transplant recipients. A 45-year-old Chinese man had a plastic biliary stent placed on account of biliary anastomotic stenosis after 3 years of piggyback liver transplantation. He came to our hospital because of recurrent fever and jaundice for 2 weeks, and his carcinoembryonic antigen-199 had increased. The patient's duodenal papillary was cauliflower-like at endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography to replace the biliary stent. He was initially suspected of having duodenal papillary carcinoma after liver transplantation. However, the pathology from endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography and endoscopic ultrasound-guided biopsy showed inflammation. While awaiting the result of biopsy, his CA-199 decreased significantly after anti-infection and symptomatic treatment. The patient was diagnosed with biliary anastomotic stenosis and duodenal papillitis. He was discharged uneventfully; to date, there is no evidence of malignant tumor. We report this case to provide helpful information to clinicians about the management of the duodenal papilla cauliflower-like neoplasm after liver transplantation, which should be considered as inflammatory first. Perhaps our view can avoid the risk of bringing an excessive medical treatment and unnecessary economic burden to patients and their families. •A cauliflower-like neoplasm in duodenal papilla after liver transplantation is not always malignant.•The possibility of inflammation should be considered.•Morphology or iconography is not a substitute for pathology.•Retransplantation or Whipple surgery should be cautioned.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.transproceed.2018.01.016
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2026421401</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0041134518300484</els_id><sourcerecordid>2026421401</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c323t-627168ccb249657aeafddf1c4be7b8bc10eeccc07283ead6522045e55556fb733</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkN9rFDEQgIMo9qz-CzL45Mue-bXZbV-k3GkrHCp60seQTWa5XHObbbJb6X9v6rXgo8PAEPJNJvMR8o7RJaNMfdgvp2SGPKZoEd2SU9YuKSupnpEFaxtRccXFc7KgVLKKCVmfkFc572k5cylekhN-phSTSi7I_crMwfch_sZUBX-D8BXjGEw-QOxhPUeHgwnw3Yw-BAN-AAMbf4cJtn__EMwwwQ-0fvQ4TOdwvTMT_NzFOTi4Rtju_HADZnCwjh_hAlYmY8HHmKbX5EVvQsY3j_WU_Pr8abu6qjbfLr-sLjaVFVxMleINU621HZdnqm4Mmt65nlnZYdO1nWUU0VpLG94KNE7VnFNZY11C9V0jxCl5f3y3-LqdMU_64LPFss2Acc6aU64kZ5Kygp4fUZtizgl7PSZ_MOleM6of1Ou9_le9flCvKSupSvPbxzlzdyh3T61PrguwPgJYtr3zmHS2RZpF5xPaSbvo_2fOH9xinGg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2026421401</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Cauliflower-like Neoplasm of Duodenal Papilla in a Liver Transplant Recipient: What Should We Think and Do? A Case Report</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present)</source><creator>Wan, D.-L. ; Li, M.-X. ; Bao, L. ; Zhang, L.-L. ; Zhang, L. ; Chen, Q.-Y. ; Lin, S.-Z.</creator><creatorcontrib>Wan, D.-L. ; Li, M.-X. ; Bao, L. ; Zhang, L.-L. ; Zhang, L. ; Chen, Q.-Y. ; Lin, S.-Z.</creatorcontrib><description>With the continuous improvement of liver transplantation technology, the survival rate of liver transplantation has been improved, but recurrent or de novo malignancy remains one of the major factors affecting the long-term survival of liver transplant recipients. A 45-year-old Chinese man had a plastic biliary stent placed on account of biliary anastomotic stenosis after 3 years of piggyback liver transplantation. He came to our hospital because of recurrent fever and jaundice for 2 weeks, and his carcinoembryonic antigen-199 had increased. The patient's duodenal papillary was cauliflower-like at endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography to replace the biliary stent. He was initially suspected of having duodenal papillary carcinoma after liver transplantation. However, the pathology from endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography and endoscopic ultrasound-guided biopsy showed inflammation. While awaiting the result of biopsy, his CA-199 decreased significantly after anti-infection and symptomatic treatment. The patient was diagnosed with biliary anastomotic stenosis and duodenal papillitis. He was discharged uneventfully; to date, there is no evidence of malignant tumor. We report this case to provide helpful information to clinicians about the management of the duodenal papilla cauliflower-like neoplasm after liver transplantation, which should be considered as inflammatory first. Perhaps our view can avoid the risk of bringing an excessive medical treatment and unnecessary economic burden to patients and their families. •A cauliflower-like neoplasm in duodenal papilla after liver transplantation is not always malignant.•The possibility of inflammation should be considered.•Morphology or iconography is not a substitute for pathology.•Retransplantation or Whipple surgery should be cautioned.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0041-1345</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-2623</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2018.01.016</identifier><identifier>PMID: 29661464</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Ampulla of Vater ; Anastomosis, Surgical - adverse effects ; Bile Ducts - surgery ; Cholangiopancreatography, Endoscopic Retrograde ; Cholestasis - etiology ; Common Bile Duct Neoplasms - etiology ; Humans ; Liver Transplantation - adverse effects ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Postoperative Complications - etiology ; Stents - adverse effects ; Transplant Recipients</subject><ispartof>Transplantation proceedings, 2018-04, Vol.50 (3), p.925-929</ispartof><rights>2018 Elsevier Inc.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2018 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c323t-627168ccb249657aeafddf1c4be7b8bc10eeccc07283ead6522045e55556fb733</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.transproceed.2018.01.016$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3549,27923,27924,45994</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29661464$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Wan, D.-L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Li, M.-X.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bao, L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhang, L.-L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhang, L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chen, Q.-Y.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lin, S.-Z.</creatorcontrib><title>Cauliflower-like Neoplasm of Duodenal Papilla in a Liver Transplant Recipient: What Should We Think and Do? A Case Report</title><title>Transplantation proceedings</title><addtitle>Transplant Proc</addtitle><description>With the continuous improvement of liver transplantation technology, the survival rate of liver transplantation has been improved, but recurrent or de novo malignancy remains one of the major factors affecting the long-term survival of liver transplant recipients. A 45-year-old Chinese man had a plastic biliary stent placed on account of biliary anastomotic stenosis after 3 years of piggyback liver transplantation. He came to our hospital because of recurrent fever and jaundice for 2 weeks, and his carcinoembryonic antigen-199 had increased. The patient's duodenal papillary was cauliflower-like at endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography to replace the biliary stent. He was initially suspected of having duodenal papillary carcinoma after liver transplantation. However, the pathology from endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography and endoscopic ultrasound-guided biopsy showed inflammation. While awaiting the result of biopsy, his CA-199 decreased significantly after anti-infection and symptomatic treatment. The patient was diagnosed with biliary anastomotic stenosis and duodenal papillitis. He was discharged uneventfully; to date, there is no evidence of malignant tumor. We report this case to provide helpful information to clinicians about the management of the duodenal papilla cauliflower-like neoplasm after liver transplantation, which should be considered as inflammatory first. Perhaps our view can avoid the risk of bringing an excessive medical treatment and unnecessary economic burden to patients and their families. •A cauliflower-like neoplasm in duodenal papilla after liver transplantation is not always malignant.•The possibility of inflammation should be considered.•Morphology or iconography is not a substitute for pathology.•Retransplantation or Whipple surgery should be cautioned.</description><subject>Ampulla of Vater</subject><subject>Anastomosis, Surgical - adverse effects</subject><subject>Bile Ducts - surgery</subject><subject>Cholangiopancreatography, Endoscopic Retrograde</subject><subject>Cholestasis - etiology</subject><subject>Common Bile Duct Neoplasms - etiology</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Liver Transplantation - adverse effects</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Postoperative Complications - etiology</subject><subject>Stents - adverse effects</subject><subject>Transplant Recipients</subject><issn>0041-1345</issn><issn>1873-2623</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkN9rFDEQgIMo9qz-CzL45Mue-bXZbV-k3GkrHCp60seQTWa5XHObbbJb6X9v6rXgo8PAEPJNJvMR8o7RJaNMfdgvp2SGPKZoEd2SU9YuKSupnpEFaxtRccXFc7KgVLKKCVmfkFc572k5cylekhN-phSTSi7I_crMwfch_sZUBX-D8BXjGEw-QOxhPUeHgwnw3Yw-BAN-AAMbf4cJtn__EMwwwQ-0fvQ4TOdwvTMT_NzFOTi4Rtju_HADZnCwjh_hAlYmY8HHmKbX5EVvQsY3j_WU_Pr8abu6qjbfLr-sLjaVFVxMleINU621HZdnqm4Mmt65nlnZYdO1nWUU0VpLG94KNE7VnFNZY11C9V0jxCl5f3y3-LqdMU_64LPFss2Acc6aU64kZ5Kygp4fUZtizgl7PSZ_MOleM6of1Ou9_le9flCvKSupSvPbxzlzdyh3T61PrguwPgJYtr3zmHS2RZpF5xPaSbvo_2fOH9xinGg</recordid><startdate>201804</startdate><enddate>201804</enddate><creator>Wan, D.-L.</creator><creator>Li, M.-X.</creator><creator>Bao, L.</creator><creator>Zhang, L.-L.</creator><creator>Zhang, L.</creator><creator>Chen, Q.-Y.</creator><creator>Lin, S.-Z.</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201804</creationdate><title>Cauliflower-like Neoplasm of Duodenal Papilla in a Liver Transplant Recipient: What Should We Think and Do? A Case Report</title><author>Wan, D.-L. ; Li, M.-X. ; Bao, L. ; Zhang, L.-L. ; Zhang, L. ; Chen, Q.-Y. ; Lin, S.-Z.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c323t-627168ccb249657aeafddf1c4be7b8bc10eeccc07283ead6522045e55556fb733</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Ampulla of Vater</topic><topic>Anastomosis, Surgical - adverse effects</topic><topic>Bile Ducts - surgery</topic><topic>Cholangiopancreatography, Endoscopic Retrograde</topic><topic>Cholestasis - etiology</topic><topic>Common Bile Duct Neoplasms - etiology</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Liver Transplantation - adverse effects</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Postoperative Complications - etiology</topic><topic>Stents - adverse effects</topic><topic>Transplant Recipients</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Wan, D.-L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Li, M.-X.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bao, L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhang, L.-L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhang, L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chen, Q.-Y.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lin, S.-Z.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Transplantation proceedings</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Wan, D.-L.</au><au>Li, M.-X.</au><au>Bao, L.</au><au>Zhang, L.-L.</au><au>Zhang, L.</au><au>Chen, Q.-Y.</au><au>Lin, S.-Z.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Cauliflower-like Neoplasm of Duodenal Papilla in a Liver Transplant Recipient: What Should We Think and Do? A Case Report</atitle><jtitle>Transplantation proceedings</jtitle><addtitle>Transplant Proc</addtitle><date>2018-04</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>50</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>925</spage><epage>929</epage><pages>925-929</pages><issn>0041-1345</issn><eissn>1873-2623</eissn><abstract>With the continuous improvement of liver transplantation technology, the survival rate of liver transplantation has been improved, but recurrent or de novo malignancy remains one of the major factors affecting the long-term survival of liver transplant recipients. A 45-year-old Chinese man had a plastic biliary stent placed on account of biliary anastomotic stenosis after 3 years of piggyback liver transplantation. He came to our hospital because of recurrent fever and jaundice for 2 weeks, and his carcinoembryonic antigen-199 had increased. The patient's duodenal papillary was cauliflower-like at endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography to replace the biliary stent. He was initially suspected of having duodenal papillary carcinoma after liver transplantation. However, the pathology from endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography and endoscopic ultrasound-guided biopsy showed inflammation. While awaiting the result of biopsy, his CA-199 decreased significantly after anti-infection and symptomatic treatment. The patient was diagnosed with biliary anastomotic stenosis and duodenal papillitis. He was discharged uneventfully; to date, there is no evidence of malignant tumor. We report this case to provide helpful information to clinicians about the management of the duodenal papilla cauliflower-like neoplasm after liver transplantation, which should be considered as inflammatory first. Perhaps our view can avoid the risk of bringing an excessive medical treatment and unnecessary economic burden to patients and their families. •A cauliflower-like neoplasm in duodenal papilla after liver transplantation is not always malignant.•The possibility of inflammation should be considered.•Morphology or iconography is not a substitute for pathology.•Retransplantation or Whipple surgery should be cautioned.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>29661464</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.transproceed.2018.01.016</doi><tpages>5</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0041-1345
ispartof Transplantation proceedings, 2018-04, Vol.50 (3), p.925-929
issn 0041-1345
1873-2623
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2026421401
source MEDLINE; ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present)
subjects Ampulla of Vater
Anastomosis, Surgical - adverse effects
Bile Ducts - surgery
Cholangiopancreatography, Endoscopic Retrograde
Cholestasis - etiology
Common Bile Duct Neoplasms - etiology
Humans
Liver Transplantation - adverse effects
Male
Middle Aged
Postoperative Complications - etiology
Stents - adverse effects
Transplant Recipients
title Cauliflower-like Neoplasm of Duodenal Papilla in a Liver Transplant Recipient: What Should We Think and Do? A Case Report
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-08T12%3A10%3A23IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Cauliflower-like%20Neoplasm%20of%20Duodenal%20Papilla%20in%20a%20Liver%20Transplant%20Recipient:%20What%20Should%20We%20Think%20and%20Do?%20A%20Case%20Report&rft.jtitle=Transplantation%20proceedings&rft.au=Wan,%20D.-L.&rft.date=2018-04&rft.volume=50&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=925&rft.epage=929&rft.pages=925-929&rft.issn=0041-1345&rft.eissn=1873-2623&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.transproceed.2018.01.016&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2026421401%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2026421401&rft_id=info:pmid/29661464&rft_els_id=S0041134518300484&rfr_iscdi=true