How to improve success rates of endoscopic management for buried bumper syndrome

Abstract Background Buried bumper syndrome (BBS) is a rare complication of percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy. Complete BBS without visible parts of the inner bumper is a challenge for endoscopic treatment. Methods and Aims Data base analysis of all procedures performed at our tertiary university e...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:QJM : An International Journal of Medicine 2018-07, Vol.111 (7), p.467-472
Hauptverfasser: Casper, M, Lammert, F
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 472
container_issue 7
container_start_page 467
container_title QJM : An International Journal of Medicine
container_volume 111
creator Casper, M
Lammert, F
description Abstract Background Buried bumper syndrome (BBS) is a rare complication of percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy. Complete BBS without visible parts of the inner bumper is a challenge for endoscopic treatment. Methods and Aims Data base analysis of all procedures performed at our tertiary university endoscopy center between 2000 and 2015 was conducted. Our aim was to improve the success rates of endoscopic treatment using a standardized approach and a pull-modification of the papillotome-based extraction technique in a prospective cohort. Results Retrospectively, 55 patients were identified (37 men; age 54 ± 16 years). The prospective series comprised 11 patients (8 men; age 63 ± 27 years). Patients with partial BBS were effectively treated by endoscopy in both cohorts (24/25 and 4/4 patients, respectively). For complete BBS (Cyrany grade 3), success rates of endoscopic therapy differed significantly between the cohorts (P = 0.017). In the retrospective cohort, only 38% of patients (9/24 patients) were successfully treated. In the prospective cohort, all six patients (deep-type in five cases) were managed without complications. Patients with extra-gastric tubes underwent primary surgery in both cohorts (six and one patients, respectively). Conclusion A structured approach improved success rates of endoscopic treatment. All patients with an internal bumper verified to lie within the gastric wall can be treated by an experienced investigator using a papillotome-based technique.
doi_str_mv 10.1093/qjmed/hcy081
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2026409078</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><oup_id>10.1093/qjmed/hcy081</oup_id><sourcerecordid>2026409078</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c361t-7c6352a138c0d303bc3230bcacda915912d869c7e36aa13ed09310356d6838d53</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kDFPwzAQRi0EolDYmJE3GAg924mTjKgCilQJBpgjx75AqjpO7QTUf09K2pXpO52ePt09Qq4Y3DPIxWyzsmhmX3oLGTsiZyyWEHGRi-PDnPJkQs5DWAFAnMbZKZnwXEqATJ6Rt4X7oZ2jtW29-0Yaeq0xBOpVh4G6imJjXNCurTW1qlGfaLHpaOU8LXtfoxnCtuhp2DbGO4sX5KRS64CX-5ySj6fH9_kiWr4-v8wflpEWknVRqqVIuGIi02AEiFILLqDUShuVsyRn3GQy1ykKqQYKzfAqA5FIIzORmURMye3YO9y96TF0ha2DxvVaNej6UHDgMoYc0mxA70ZUexeCx6pofW2V3xYMip3D4s9hMToc8Ot9c1_u1gf4IG0AbkbA9e3_Vb8wynvh</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2026409078</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>How to improve success rates of endoscopic management for buried bumper syndrome</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><source>EZB Electronic Journals Library</source><source>Oxford Academic</source><creator>Casper, M ; Lammert, F</creator><creatorcontrib>Casper, M ; Lammert, F</creatorcontrib><description>Abstract Background Buried bumper syndrome (BBS) is a rare complication of percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy. Complete BBS without visible parts of the inner bumper is a challenge for endoscopic treatment. Methods and Aims Data base analysis of all procedures performed at our tertiary university endoscopy center between 2000 and 2015 was conducted. Our aim was to improve the success rates of endoscopic treatment using a standardized approach and a pull-modification of the papillotome-based extraction technique in a prospective cohort. Results Retrospectively, 55 patients were identified (37 men; age 54 ± 16 years). The prospective series comprised 11 patients (8 men; age 63 ± 27 years). Patients with partial BBS were effectively treated by endoscopy in both cohorts (24/25 and 4/4 patients, respectively). For complete BBS (Cyrany grade 3), success rates of endoscopic therapy differed significantly between the cohorts (P = 0.017). In the retrospective cohort, only 38% of patients (9/24 patients) were successfully treated. In the prospective cohort, all six patients (deep-type in five cases) were managed without complications. Patients with extra-gastric tubes underwent primary surgery in both cohorts (six and one patients, respectively). Conclusion A structured approach improved success rates of endoscopic treatment. All patients with an internal bumper verified to lie within the gastric wall can be treated by an experienced investigator using a papillotome-based technique.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1460-2725</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1460-2393</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1093/qjmed/hcy081</identifier><identifier>PMID: 29660086</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Oxford University Press</publisher><subject>Adolescent ; Adult ; Aged ; Catheters, Indwelling - adverse effects ; Child ; Child, Preschool ; Device Removal ; Enteral Nutrition - adverse effects ; Enteral Nutrition - instrumentation ; Enteral Nutrition - methods ; Equipment Design ; Equipment Failure ; Female ; Foreign-Body Migration - etiology ; Foreign-Body Migration - therapy ; Gastroscopy - adverse effects ; Gastroscopy - instrumentation ; Gastrostomy - adverse effects ; Gastrostomy - instrumentation ; Gastrostomy - methods ; Germany ; Humans ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Prospective Studies ; Retrospective Studies ; Young Adult</subject><ispartof>QJM : An International Journal of Medicine, 2018-07, Vol.111 (7), p.467-472</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2018. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Association of Physicians. All rights reserved. For permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com 2018</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c361t-7c6352a138c0d303bc3230bcacda915912d869c7e36aa13ed09310356d6838d53</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c361t-7c6352a138c0d303bc3230bcacda915912d869c7e36aa13ed09310356d6838d53</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1578,27903,27904</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29660086$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Casper, M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lammert, F</creatorcontrib><title>How to improve success rates of endoscopic management for buried bumper syndrome</title><title>QJM : An International Journal of Medicine</title><addtitle>QJM</addtitle><description>Abstract Background Buried bumper syndrome (BBS) is a rare complication of percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy. Complete BBS without visible parts of the inner bumper is a challenge for endoscopic treatment. Methods and Aims Data base analysis of all procedures performed at our tertiary university endoscopy center between 2000 and 2015 was conducted. Our aim was to improve the success rates of endoscopic treatment using a standardized approach and a pull-modification of the papillotome-based extraction technique in a prospective cohort. Results Retrospectively, 55 patients were identified (37 men; age 54 ± 16 years). The prospective series comprised 11 patients (8 men; age 63 ± 27 years). Patients with partial BBS were effectively treated by endoscopy in both cohorts (24/25 and 4/4 patients, respectively). For complete BBS (Cyrany grade 3), success rates of endoscopic therapy differed significantly between the cohorts (P = 0.017). In the retrospective cohort, only 38% of patients (9/24 patients) were successfully treated. In the prospective cohort, all six patients (deep-type in five cases) were managed without complications. Patients with extra-gastric tubes underwent primary surgery in both cohorts (six and one patients, respectively). Conclusion A structured approach improved success rates of endoscopic treatment. All patients with an internal bumper verified to lie within the gastric wall can be treated by an experienced investigator using a papillotome-based technique.</description><subject>Adolescent</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Catheters, Indwelling - adverse effects</subject><subject>Child</subject><subject>Child, Preschool</subject><subject>Device Removal</subject><subject>Enteral Nutrition - adverse effects</subject><subject>Enteral Nutrition - instrumentation</subject><subject>Enteral Nutrition - methods</subject><subject>Equipment Design</subject><subject>Equipment Failure</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Foreign-Body Migration - etiology</subject><subject>Foreign-Body Migration - therapy</subject><subject>Gastroscopy - adverse effects</subject><subject>Gastroscopy - instrumentation</subject><subject>Gastrostomy - adverse effects</subject><subject>Gastrostomy - instrumentation</subject><subject>Gastrostomy - methods</subject><subject>Germany</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Prospective Studies</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><subject>Young Adult</subject><issn>1460-2725</issn><issn>1460-2393</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kDFPwzAQRi0EolDYmJE3GAg924mTjKgCilQJBpgjx75AqjpO7QTUf09K2pXpO52ePt09Qq4Y3DPIxWyzsmhmX3oLGTsiZyyWEHGRi-PDnPJkQs5DWAFAnMbZKZnwXEqATJ6Rt4X7oZ2jtW29-0Yaeq0xBOpVh4G6imJjXNCurTW1qlGfaLHpaOU8LXtfoxnCtuhp2DbGO4sX5KRS64CX-5ySj6fH9_kiWr4-v8wflpEWknVRqqVIuGIi02AEiFILLqDUShuVsyRn3GQy1ykKqQYKzfAqA5FIIzORmURMye3YO9y96TF0ha2DxvVaNej6UHDgMoYc0mxA70ZUexeCx6pofW2V3xYMip3D4s9hMToc8Ot9c1_u1gf4IG0AbkbA9e3_Vb8wynvh</recordid><startdate>20180701</startdate><enddate>20180701</enddate><creator>Casper, M</creator><creator>Lammert, F</creator><general>Oxford University Press</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20180701</creationdate><title>How to improve success rates of endoscopic management for buried bumper syndrome</title><author>Casper, M ; Lammert, F</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c361t-7c6352a138c0d303bc3230bcacda915912d869c7e36aa13ed09310356d6838d53</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Adolescent</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Catheters, Indwelling - adverse effects</topic><topic>Child</topic><topic>Child, Preschool</topic><topic>Device Removal</topic><topic>Enteral Nutrition - adverse effects</topic><topic>Enteral Nutrition - instrumentation</topic><topic>Enteral Nutrition - methods</topic><topic>Equipment Design</topic><topic>Equipment Failure</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Foreign-Body Migration - etiology</topic><topic>Foreign-Body Migration - therapy</topic><topic>Gastroscopy - adverse effects</topic><topic>Gastroscopy - instrumentation</topic><topic>Gastrostomy - adverse effects</topic><topic>Gastrostomy - instrumentation</topic><topic>Gastrostomy - methods</topic><topic>Germany</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Prospective Studies</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><topic>Young Adult</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Casper, M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lammert, F</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>QJM : An International Journal of Medicine</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Casper, M</au><au>Lammert, F</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>How to improve success rates of endoscopic management for buried bumper syndrome</atitle><jtitle>QJM : An International Journal of Medicine</jtitle><addtitle>QJM</addtitle><date>2018-07-01</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>111</volume><issue>7</issue><spage>467</spage><epage>472</epage><pages>467-472</pages><issn>1460-2725</issn><eissn>1460-2393</eissn><abstract>Abstract Background Buried bumper syndrome (BBS) is a rare complication of percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy. Complete BBS without visible parts of the inner bumper is a challenge for endoscopic treatment. Methods and Aims Data base analysis of all procedures performed at our tertiary university endoscopy center between 2000 and 2015 was conducted. Our aim was to improve the success rates of endoscopic treatment using a standardized approach and a pull-modification of the papillotome-based extraction technique in a prospective cohort. Results Retrospectively, 55 patients were identified (37 men; age 54 ± 16 years). The prospective series comprised 11 patients (8 men; age 63 ± 27 years). Patients with partial BBS were effectively treated by endoscopy in both cohorts (24/25 and 4/4 patients, respectively). For complete BBS (Cyrany grade 3), success rates of endoscopic therapy differed significantly between the cohorts (P = 0.017). In the retrospective cohort, only 38% of patients (9/24 patients) were successfully treated. In the prospective cohort, all six patients (deep-type in five cases) were managed without complications. Patients with extra-gastric tubes underwent primary surgery in both cohorts (six and one patients, respectively). Conclusion A structured approach improved success rates of endoscopic treatment. All patients with an internal bumper verified to lie within the gastric wall can be treated by an experienced investigator using a papillotome-based technique.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Oxford University Press</pub><pmid>29660086</pmid><doi>10.1093/qjmed/hcy081</doi><tpages>6</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1460-2725
ispartof QJM : An International Journal of Medicine, 2018-07, Vol.111 (7), p.467-472
issn 1460-2725
1460-2393
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2026409078
source MEDLINE; Alma/SFX Local Collection; EZB Electronic Journals Library; Oxford Academic
subjects Adolescent
Adult
Aged
Catheters, Indwelling - adverse effects
Child
Child, Preschool
Device Removal
Enteral Nutrition - adverse effects
Enteral Nutrition - instrumentation
Enteral Nutrition - methods
Equipment Design
Equipment Failure
Female
Foreign-Body Migration - etiology
Foreign-Body Migration - therapy
Gastroscopy - adverse effects
Gastroscopy - instrumentation
Gastrostomy - adverse effects
Gastrostomy - instrumentation
Gastrostomy - methods
Germany
Humans
Male
Middle Aged
Prospective Studies
Retrospective Studies
Young Adult
title How to improve success rates of endoscopic management for buried bumper syndrome
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-24T20%3A46%3A01IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=How%20to%20improve%20success%20rates%20of%20endoscopic%20management%20for%20buried%20bumper%20syndrome&rft.jtitle=QJM%20:%20An%20International%20Journal%20of%20Medicine&rft.au=Casper,%20M&rft.date=2018-07-01&rft.volume=111&rft.issue=7&rft.spage=467&rft.epage=472&rft.pages=467-472&rft.issn=1460-2725&rft.eissn=1460-2393&rft_id=info:doi/10.1093/qjmed/hcy081&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2026409078%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2026409078&rft_id=info:pmid/29660086&rft_oup_id=10.1093/qjmed/hcy081&rfr_iscdi=true