Female Preferences for Aposematic Signal Components in a Polymorphic Poison Frog
Aposematic signals may be subject to conflicting selective pressures from predators and conspecifics. We studied female preferences for different components of aposematic coloration in the polymorphic poison frog Oophaga pumilio across several phenotypically distinct populations. This frog shows str...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Evolution 2008-09, Vol.62 (9), p.2334-2345 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 2345 |
---|---|
container_issue | 9 |
container_start_page | 2334 |
container_title | Evolution |
container_volume | 62 |
creator | Maan, Martine E. Cummings, Molly E. |
description | Aposematic signals may be subject to conflicting selective pressures from predators and conspecifics. We studied female preferences for different components of aposematic coloration in the polymorphic poison frog Oophaga pumilio across several phenotypically distinct populations. This frog shows striking diversity in color and pattern between geographically isolated populations in western Panama. Results indicate that male dorsal color is the most important determiner of female preferences. We did not find consistent evidence for effects of other signal components, such as spotting pattern or ventral color. Females in two populations showed assortative preferences mediated by male dorsal coloration. In a third population we found incomplete color-assortative preference behavior, with females exhibiting strong discrimination toward one novel color but not another. These results hint at a possible interaction between sexual and natural selection: female tolerance of unfamiliar coloration patterns could facilitate the establishment of novel phenotypes that are favored by other selective pressures (e.g., predator biases). Furthermore, our study suggests that specific components of the aposematic signal (i.e., dorsal color, ventral color, and spotting pattern) are affected differently by natural and sexual selection. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1111/j.1558-5646.2008.00454.x |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_20263077</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>25150836</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>25150836</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-b5974-c8a83404e3956bf846e0a64591c8d2beac7231a861b2fe95f42b3781eb6502d73</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkc1u1DAUhS0EokPhEUAWC3YJ_o8jsWlHnVKptINoYWk5mZuSkMTBzoiZt8dpRoPEqt7Y0vnO0b3HCGFKUhrPxyalUupEKqFSRohOCRFSpLtnaHEUnqMFIVQkXDNygl6F0BBCcknzl-iEakWVVHqB1ivobAt47aECD30JAVfO47PBhaiMdYm_1Q-9bfHSdYProR8Drnts8dq1-8754WdE1q4Orscr7x5eoxeVbQO8Odyn6H51cbf8nFzfXl4tz66TQuaZSEptNRdEAM-lKiotFBCrhMxpqTesAFtmjFMb5yxYBbmsBCt4pikUShK2yfgp-jDnDt793kIYTVeHEtrW9uC2wTDCFCfZBL7_D2zc1seNIsMyInKtJ0jPUOldCLELM_i6s35vKDFT5aYxU7NmatZMlZvHys0uWt8d8rdFB5t_xkPHEfg0A3_qFvZPDjYX32_jI9rfzvYmjM4f7UxSSTRXUU9mvQ4j7I669b-MyngmzY-bSyNuzpeSf_lqpnHUzBe1i__59EX_ApfXtsQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>227049887</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Female Preferences for Aposematic Signal Components in a Polymorphic Poison Frog</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><source>BioOne Complete</source><source>Jstor Complete Legacy</source><source>Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current)</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><creator>Maan, Martine E. ; Cummings, Molly E.</creator><contributor>Mappes, J</contributor><creatorcontrib>Maan, Martine E. ; Cummings, Molly E. ; Mappes, J</creatorcontrib><description>Aposematic signals may be subject to conflicting selective pressures from predators and conspecifics. We studied female preferences for different components of aposematic coloration in the polymorphic poison frog Oophaga pumilio across several phenotypically distinct populations. This frog shows striking diversity in color and pattern between geographically isolated populations in western Panama. Results indicate that male dorsal color is the most important determiner of female preferences. We did not find consistent evidence for effects of other signal components, such as spotting pattern or ventral color. Females in two populations showed assortative preferences mediated by male dorsal coloration. In a third population we found incomplete color-assortative preference behavior, with females exhibiting strong discrimination toward one novel color but not another. These results hint at a possible interaction between sexual and natural selection: female tolerance of unfamiliar coloration patterns could facilitate the establishment of novel phenotypes that are favored by other selective pressures (e.g., predator biases). Furthermore, our study suggests that specific components of the aposematic signal (i.e., dorsal color, ventral color, and spotting pattern) are affected differently by natural and sexual selection.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0014-3820</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1558-5646</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/j.1558-5646.2008.00454.x</identifier><identifier>PMID: 18616568</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Malden, USA: Blackwell Publishing Inc</publisher><subject>Animals ; Anura ; Anura - genetics ; Bocas del Toro Archipelago ; Color ; Colors ; Costa Rica ; Dendrobatidae ; divergence ; Evolution ; Female ; Female animals ; Frogs ; Genotype & phenotype ; Geography ; Male ; Male animals ; Mating behavior ; Mating Preference, Animal ; Oophaga pumilio ; ORIGINAL ARTICLES ; Poisons ; Predation ; Predators ; Selection, Genetic ; Sex Characteristics ; Sexual selection ; Skin Pigmentation ; Spectral reflectance ; Studies ; warning coloration</subject><ispartof>Evolution, 2008-09, Vol.62 (9), p.2334-2345</ispartof><rights>2008 The Author(s). Journal compilation © 2008 The Society for the Study of Evolution</rights><rights>Copyright 2008 The Society for the Study of Evolution</rights><rights>Copyright Society for the Study of Evolution Sep 2008</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-b5974-c8a83404e3956bf846e0a64591c8d2beac7231a861b2fe95f42b3781eb6502d73</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-b5974-c8a83404e3956bf846e0a64591c8d2beac7231a861b2fe95f42b3781eb6502d73</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://bioone.org/doi/pdf/10.1111/j.1558-5646.2008.00454.x$$EPDF$$P50$$Gbioone$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/25150836$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,800,1412,26959,27905,27906,45555,45556,52344,57998,58231</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18616568$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><contributor>Mappes, J</contributor><creatorcontrib>Maan, Martine E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cummings, Molly E.</creatorcontrib><title>Female Preferences for Aposematic Signal Components in a Polymorphic Poison Frog</title><title>Evolution</title><addtitle>Evolution</addtitle><description>Aposematic signals may be subject to conflicting selective pressures from predators and conspecifics. We studied female preferences for different components of aposematic coloration in the polymorphic poison frog Oophaga pumilio across several phenotypically distinct populations. This frog shows striking diversity in color and pattern between geographically isolated populations in western Panama. Results indicate that male dorsal color is the most important determiner of female preferences. We did not find consistent evidence for effects of other signal components, such as spotting pattern or ventral color. Females in two populations showed assortative preferences mediated by male dorsal coloration. In a third population we found incomplete color-assortative preference behavior, with females exhibiting strong discrimination toward one novel color but not another. These results hint at a possible interaction between sexual and natural selection: female tolerance of unfamiliar coloration patterns could facilitate the establishment of novel phenotypes that are favored by other selective pressures (e.g., predator biases). Furthermore, our study suggests that specific components of the aposematic signal (i.e., dorsal color, ventral color, and spotting pattern) are affected differently by natural and sexual selection.</description><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Anura</subject><subject>Anura - genetics</subject><subject>Bocas del Toro Archipelago</subject><subject>Color</subject><subject>Colors</subject><subject>Costa Rica</subject><subject>Dendrobatidae</subject><subject>divergence</subject><subject>Evolution</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Female animals</subject><subject>Frogs</subject><subject>Genotype & phenotype</subject><subject>Geography</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Male animals</subject><subject>Mating behavior</subject><subject>Mating Preference, Animal</subject><subject>Oophaga pumilio</subject><subject>ORIGINAL ARTICLES</subject><subject>Poisons</subject><subject>Predation</subject><subject>Predators</subject><subject>Selection, Genetic</subject><subject>Sex Characteristics</subject><subject>Sexual selection</subject><subject>Skin Pigmentation</subject><subject>Spectral reflectance</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>warning coloration</subject><issn>0014-3820</issn><issn>1558-5646</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2008</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkc1u1DAUhS0EokPhEUAWC3YJ_o8jsWlHnVKptINoYWk5mZuSkMTBzoiZt8dpRoPEqt7Y0vnO0b3HCGFKUhrPxyalUupEKqFSRohOCRFSpLtnaHEUnqMFIVQkXDNygl6F0BBCcknzl-iEakWVVHqB1ivobAt47aECD30JAVfO47PBhaiMdYm_1Q-9bfHSdYProR8Drnts8dq1-8754WdE1q4Orscr7x5eoxeVbQO8Odyn6H51cbf8nFzfXl4tz66TQuaZSEptNRdEAM-lKiotFBCrhMxpqTesAFtmjFMb5yxYBbmsBCt4pikUShK2yfgp-jDnDt793kIYTVeHEtrW9uC2wTDCFCfZBL7_D2zc1seNIsMyInKtJ0jPUOldCLELM_i6s35vKDFT5aYxU7NmatZMlZvHys0uWt8d8rdFB5t_xkPHEfg0A3_qFvZPDjYX32_jI9rfzvYmjM4f7UxSSTRXUU9mvQ4j7I669b-MyngmzY-bSyNuzpeSf_lqpnHUzBe1i__59EX_ApfXtsQ</recordid><startdate>200809</startdate><enddate>200809</enddate><creator>Maan, Martine E.</creator><creator>Cummings, Molly E.</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Inc</general><general>Blackwell Publishing, Inc</general><general>Oxford University Press</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7QP</scope><scope>7QR</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>7TM</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>H95</scope><scope>L.G</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200809</creationdate><title>Female Preferences for Aposematic Signal Components in a Polymorphic Poison Frog</title><author>Maan, Martine E. ; Cummings, Molly E.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-b5974-c8a83404e3956bf846e0a64591c8d2beac7231a861b2fe95f42b3781eb6502d73</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2008</creationdate><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Anura</topic><topic>Anura - genetics</topic><topic>Bocas del Toro Archipelago</topic><topic>Color</topic><topic>Colors</topic><topic>Costa Rica</topic><topic>Dendrobatidae</topic><topic>divergence</topic><topic>Evolution</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Female animals</topic><topic>Frogs</topic><topic>Genotype & phenotype</topic><topic>Geography</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Male animals</topic><topic>Mating behavior</topic><topic>Mating Preference, Animal</topic><topic>Oophaga pumilio</topic><topic>ORIGINAL ARTICLES</topic><topic>Poisons</topic><topic>Predation</topic><topic>Predators</topic><topic>Selection, Genetic</topic><topic>Sex Characteristics</topic><topic>Sexual selection</topic><topic>Skin Pigmentation</topic><topic>Spectral reflectance</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>warning coloration</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Maan, Martine E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cummings, Molly E.</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Calcium & Calcified Tissue Abstracts</collection><collection>Chemoreception Abstracts</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>Nucleic Acids Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 1: Biological Sciences & Living Resources</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><jtitle>Evolution</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Maan, Martine E.</au><au>Cummings, Molly E.</au><au>Mappes, J</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Female Preferences for Aposematic Signal Components in a Polymorphic Poison Frog</atitle><jtitle>Evolution</jtitle><addtitle>Evolution</addtitle><date>2008-09</date><risdate>2008</risdate><volume>62</volume><issue>9</issue><spage>2334</spage><epage>2345</epage><pages>2334-2345</pages><issn>0014-3820</issn><eissn>1558-5646</eissn><abstract>Aposematic signals may be subject to conflicting selective pressures from predators and conspecifics. We studied female preferences for different components of aposematic coloration in the polymorphic poison frog Oophaga pumilio across several phenotypically distinct populations. This frog shows striking diversity in color and pattern between geographically isolated populations in western Panama. Results indicate that male dorsal color is the most important determiner of female preferences. We did not find consistent evidence for effects of other signal components, such as spotting pattern or ventral color. Females in two populations showed assortative preferences mediated by male dorsal coloration. In a third population we found incomplete color-assortative preference behavior, with females exhibiting strong discrimination toward one novel color but not another. These results hint at a possible interaction between sexual and natural selection: female tolerance of unfamiliar coloration patterns could facilitate the establishment of novel phenotypes that are favored by other selective pressures (e.g., predator biases). Furthermore, our study suggests that specific components of the aposematic signal (i.e., dorsal color, ventral color, and spotting pattern) are affected differently by natural and sexual selection.</abstract><cop>Malden, USA</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Inc</pub><pmid>18616568</pmid><doi>10.1111/j.1558-5646.2008.00454.x</doi><tpages>12</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0014-3820 |
ispartof | Evolution, 2008-09, Vol.62 (9), p.2334-2345 |
issn | 0014-3820 1558-5646 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_20263077 |
source | MEDLINE; Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete; BioOne Complete; Jstor Complete Legacy; Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current); EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals |
subjects | Animals Anura Anura - genetics Bocas del Toro Archipelago Color Colors Costa Rica Dendrobatidae divergence Evolution Female Female animals Frogs Genotype & phenotype Geography Male Male animals Mating behavior Mating Preference, Animal Oophaga pumilio ORIGINAL ARTICLES Poisons Predation Predators Selection, Genetic Sex Characteristics Sexual selection Skin Pigmentation Spectral reflectance Studies warning coloration |
title | Female Preferences for Aposematic Signal Components in a Polymorphic Poison Frog |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-20T07%3A46%3A45IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Female%20Preferences%20for%20Aposematic%20Signal%20Components%20in%20a%20Polymorphic%20Poison%20Frog&rft.jtitle=Evolution&rft.au=Maan,%20Martine%20E.&rft.date=2008-09&rft.volume=62&rft.issue=9&rft.spage=2334&rft.epage=2345&rft.pages=2334-2345&rft.issn=0014-3820&rft.eissn=1558-5646&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/j.1558-5646.2008.00454.x&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E25150836%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=227049887&rft_id=info:pmid/18616568&rft_jstor_id=25150836&rfr_iscdi=true |