Potential Effects of Striped Bass Predation on Juvenile Fish in the Hudson River
This study addressed the question whether the increase in the abundance of striped bass Morone saxatilis in the Hudson River that began after 1990 and the associated increase in predatory demand could have been responsible for the observed declines in the abundance of juvenile river herring (i.e., b...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Transactions of the American Fisheries Society (1900) 2008-11, Vol.137 (6), p.1591-1605 |
---|---|
1. Verfasser: | |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 1605 |
---|---|
container_issue | 6 |
container_start_page | 1591 |
container_title | Transactions of the American Fisheries Society (1900) |
container_volume | 137 |
creator | Heimbuch, Douglas G. |
description | This study addressed the question whether the increase in the abundance of striped bass Morone saxatilis in the Hudson River that began after 1990 and the associated increase in predatory demand could have been responsible for the observed declines in the abundance of juvenile river herring (i.e., blueback herring Alosa aestivalis and alewife A. pseudoharengus), Atlantic tomcod Microgadus tomcod, and white perch Morone americana as well as the apparent decline in the survival of juvenile striped bass in the Hudson River. The seasonal (August through October) predatory demand of Hudson River striped bass (ages 1‐13) was estimated to have increased from an average of 3.4 million kg/year for the period 1982‐1990 to an average of 15.0 million kg/year for the period 1991‐2004. Since 1990, the average abundance of juvenile fish in the Hudson River has declined—60% for river herring, 69% for Atlantic tomcod, and 59% for white perch—and juvenile striped bass survival has declined 87%. These declines could be explained by the increase in striped bass predatory demand if (1) 3.3% of the seasonal predatory demand of age‐1 to age‐13 striped bass was satisfied by consumption of juveniles of the four taxa or (2) 11.1% of the seasonal predatory demand of age‐1 and age‐2 Hudson River striped bass was satisfied by consumption of juveniles of the four taxa. Historical information on the fraction of the Hudson River striped bass stock that inhabits the Hudson River from August through October, combined with the dietary preferences of Hudson River striped bass, appear to be consistent with these levels of consumption. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1577/T07-236.1 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_20261127</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>20261127</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3401-79147e16a03ebb3be443cbded47d3a4f10b62edc654ee3358205417d548cb0743</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kMFKAzEQhoMoWKsH3yAnwcO2mU2y2R5raa1SsNh6DtnNLI1sd2uyW-nbG6lXYWAY_o-B_yPkHtgIpFLjLVNJyrMRXJABSJEneSYnl2TAGEuTXOTqmtyE8BlPqbJ8QNbrtsOmc6am86rCsgu0reim8-6Alj6ZEOjaozWdaxsa57U_YuNqpAsXdtQ1tNshXfY2xOzdHdHfkqvK1AHv_vaQfCzm29kyWb09v8ymq6TkgkGiJiAUQmYYx6LgBQrBy8KiFcpyIypgRZaiLTMpEDmXecqkAGVjpbJgSvAheTj_Pfj2q8fQ6b0LJda1abDtg05ZmgGkKoKPZ7D0bQgeK33wbm_8SQPTv850dKajMw2RHZ_Z71jx9D-ot9PFBuQE-A8azmvx</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>20261127</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Potential Effects of Striped Bass Predation on Juvenile Fish in the Hudson River</title><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><creator>Heimbuch, Douglas G.</creator><creatorcontrib>Heimbuch, Douglas G.</creatorcontrib><description>This study addressed the question whether the increase in the abundance of striped bass Morone saxatilis in the Hudson River that began after 1990 and the associated increase in predatory demand could have been responsible for the observed declines in the abundance of juvenile river herring (i.e., blueback herring Alosa aestivalis and alewife A. pseudoharengus), Atlantic tomcod Microgadus tomcod, and white perch Morone americana as well as the apparent decline in the survival of juvenile striped bass in the Hudson River. The seasonal (August through October) predatory demand of Hudson River striped bass (ages 1‐13) was estimated to have increased from an average of 3.4 million kg/year for the period 1982‐1990 to an average of 15.0 million kg/year for the period 1991‐2004. Since 1990, the average abundance of juvenile fish in the Hudson River has declined—60% for river herring, 69% for Atlantic tomcod, and 59% for white perch—and juvenile striped bass survival has declined 87%. These declines could be explained by the increase in striped bass predatory demand if (1) 3.3% of the seasonal predatory demand of age‐1 to age‐13 striped bass was satisfied by consumption of juveniles of the four taxa or (2) 11.1% of the seasonal predatory demand of age‐1 and age‐2 Hudson River striped bass was satisfied by consumption of juveniles of the four taxa. Historical information on the fraction of the Hudson River striped bass stock that inhabits the Hudson River from August through October, combined with the dietary preferences of Hudson River striped bass, appear to be consistent with these levels of consumption.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0002-8487</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1548-8659</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1577/T07-236.1</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Taylor & Francis Group</publisher><subject>Alosa aestivalis ; Freshwater ; Marine ; Microgadus tomcod ; Morone americana ; Morone saxatilis</subject><ispartof>Transactions of the American Fisheries Society (1900), 2008-11, Vol.137 (6), p.1591-1605</ispartof><rights>2008 American Fisheries Society</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3401-79147e16a03ebb3be443cbded47d3a4f10b62edc654ee3358205417d548cb0743</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3401-79147e16a03ebb3be443cbded47d3a4f10b62edc654ee3358205417d548cb0743</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1577%2FT07-236.1$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1577%2FT07-236.1$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,27901,27902,45550,45551</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Heimbuch, Douglas G.</creatorcontrib><title>Potential Effects of Striped Bass Predation on Juvenile Fish in the Hudson River</title><title>Transactions of the American Fisheries Society (1900)</title><description>This study addressed the question whether the increase in the abundance of striped bass Morone saxatilis in the Hudson River that began after 1990 and the associated increase in predatory demand could have been responsible for the observed declines in the abundance of juvenile river herring (i.e., blueback herring Alosa aestivalis and alewife A. pseudoharengus), Atlantic tomcod Microgadus tomcod, and white perch Morone americana as well as the apparent decline in the survival of juvenile striped bass in the Hudson River. The seasonal (August through October) predatory demand of Hudson River striped bass (ages 1‐13) was estimated to have increased from an average of 3.4 million kg/year for the period 1982‐1990 to an average of 15.0 million kg/year for the period 1991‐2004. Since 1990, the average abundance of juvenile fish in the Hudson River has declined—60% for river herring, 69% for Atlantic tomcod, and 59% for white perch—and juvenile striped bass survival has declined 87%. These declines could be explained by the increase in striped bass predatory demand if (1) 3.3% of the seasonal predatory demand of age‐1 to age‐13 striped bass was satisfied by consumption of juveniles of the four taxa or (2) 11.1% of the seasonal predatory demand of age‐1 and age‐2 Hudson River striped bass was satisfied by consumption of juveniles of the four taxa. Historical information on the fraction of the Hudson River striped bass stock that inhabits the Hudson River from August through October, combined with the dietary preferences of Hudson River striped bass, appear to be consistent with these levels of consumption.</description><subject>Alosa aestivalis</subject><subject>Freshwater</subject><subject>Marine</subject><subject>Microgadus tomcod</subject><subject>Morone americana</subject><subject>Morone saxatilis</subject><issn>0002-8487</issn><issn>1548-8659</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2008</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1kMFKAzEQhoMoWKsH3yAnwcO2mU2y2R5raa1SsNh6DtnNLI1sd2uyW-nbG6lXYWAY_o-B_yPkHtgIpFLjLVNJyrMRXJABSJEneSYnl2TAGEuTXOTqmtyE8BlPqbJ8QNbrtsOmc6am86rCsgu0reim8-6Alj6ZEOjaozWdaxsa57U_YuNqpAsXdtQ1tNshXfY2xOzdHdHfkqvK1AHv_vaQfCzm29kyWb09v8ymq6TkgkGiJiAUQmYYx6LgBQrBy8KiFcpyIypgRZaiLTMpEDmXecqkAGVjpbJgSvAheTj_Pfj2q8fQ6b0LJda1abDtg05ZmgGkKoKPZ7D0bQgeK33wbm_8SQPTv850dKajMw2RHZ_Z71jx9D-ot9PFBuQE-A8azmvx</recordid><startdate>200811</startdate><enddate>200811</enddate><creator>Heimbuch, Douglas G.</creator><general>Taylor & Francis Group</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7U6</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>H95</scope><scope>L.G</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200811</creationdate><title>Potential Effects of Striped Bass Predation on Juvenile Fish in the Hudson River</title><author>Heimbuch, Douglas G.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3401-79147e16a03ebb3be443cbded47d3a4f10b62edc654ee3358205417d548cb0743</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2008</creationdate><topic>Alosa aestivalis</topic><topic>Freshwater</topic><topic>Marine</topic><topic>Microgadus tomcod</topic><topic>Morone americana</topic><topic>Morone saxatilis</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Heimbuch, Douglas G.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Sustainability Science Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 1: Biological Sciences & Living Resources</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><jtitle>Transactions of the American Fisheries Society (1900)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Heimbuch, Douglas G.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Potential Effects of Striped Bass Predation on Juvenile Fish in the Hudson River</atitle><jtitle>Transactions of the American Fisheries Society (1900)</jtitle><date>2008-11</date><risdate>2008</risdate><volume>137</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>1591</spage><epage>1605</epage><pages>1591-1605</pages><issn>0002-8487</issn><eissn>1548-8659</eissn><abstract>This study addressed the question whether the increase in the abundance of striped bass Morone saxatilis in the Hudson River that began after 1990 and the associated increase in predatory demand could have been responsible for the observed declines in the abundance of juvenile river herring (i.e., blueback herring Alosa aestivalis and alewife A. pseudoharengus), Atlantic tomcod Microgadus tomcod, and white perch Morone americana as well as the apparent decline in the survival of juvenile striped bass in the Hudson River. The seasonal (August through October) predatory demand of Hudson River striped bass (ages 1‐13) was estimated to have increased from an average of 3.4 million kg/year for the period 1982‐1990 to an average of 15.0 million kg/year for the period 1991‐2004. Since 1990, the average abundance of juvenile fish in the Hudson River has declined—60% for river herring, 69% for Atlantic tomcod, and 59% for white perch—and juvenile striped bass survival has declined 87%. These declines could be explained by the increase in striped bass predatory demand if (1) 3.3% of the seasonal predatory demand of age‐1 to age‐13 striped bass was satisfied by consumption of juveniles of the four taxa or (2) 11.1% of the seasonal predatory demand of age‐1 and age‐2 Hudson River striped bass was satisfied by consumption of juveniles of the four taxa. Historical information on the fraction of the Hudson River striped bass stock that inhabits the Hudson River from August through October, combined with the dietary preferences of Hudson River striped bass, appear to be consistent with these levels of consumption.</abstract><pub>Taylor & Francis Group</pub><doi>10.1577/T07-236.1</doi><tpages>15</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0002-8487 |
ispartof | Transactions of the American Fisheries Society (1900), 2008-11, Vol.137 (6), p.1591-1605 |
issn | 0002-8487 1548-8659 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_20261127 |
source | Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete |
subjects | Alosa aestivalis Freshwater Marine Microgadus tomcod Morone americana Morone saxatilis |
title | Potential Effects of Striped Bass Predation on Juvenile Fish in the Hudson River |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-02T17%3A58%3A07IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Potential%20Effects%20of%20Striped%20Bass%20Predation%20on%20Juvenile%20Fish%20in%20the%20Hudson%20River&rft.jtitle=Transactions%20of%20the%20American%20Fisheries%20Society%20(1900)&rft.au=Heimbuch,%20Douglas%20G.&rft.date=2008-11&rft.volume=137&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=1591&rft.epage=1605&rft.pages=1591-1605&rft.issn=0002-8487&rft.eissn=1548-8659&rft_id=info:doi/10.1577/T07-236.1&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E20261127%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=20261127&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |