Light experience and the development of behavioural lateralization in chicks

Chicks searching for food grains against a background of unfamiliar pebbles usually peck pebbles less when using the right eye (RE), or both eyes, than when using the left eye (LE), provided that the embryo's RE has been exposed to light (Li), as is normal. When pecking is fast this right/left...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Behavioural brain research 2007-02, Vol.177 (1), p.61-69
Hauptverfasser: Rogers, L.J., Andrew, R.J., Johnston, A.N.B.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 69
container_issue 1
container_start_page 61
container_title Behavioural brain research
container_volume 177
creator Rogers, L.J.
Andrew, R.J.
Johnston, A.N.B.
description Chicks searching for food grains against a background of unfamiliar pebbles usually peck pebbles less when using the right eye (RE), or both eyes, than when using the left eye (LE), provided that the embryo's RE has been exposed to light (Li), as is normal. When pecking is fast this right/left difference is mainly due to a heightened ability of RE chicks to inhibit premature pecks (and inappropriate responses in general). Dark incubation (Da) abolishes this ability in RE chicks, and RE and LE chicks show similar frequent pebble pecks. We show now that, under conditions that cause cautious pecking, both Li and Da chicks show a new effect: in both cases LE chicks peck pebbles more than RE chicks, probably because of the novelty of pebbles. Interest in novelty in LE chicks is known to be unaffected by light in incubation. Age-dependent effects are also important. RE and LE chicks, which had either the LE or RE exposed to light before hatching, were tested on days 3, 5, 8 or 12 post-hatching, under conditions giving normal fast pecking. Artificial exposure of the embryo's LE to light reversed the lateralization: in general, chicks using the light-exposed eye performed well at all ages. Irrespective of which eye system had heightened ability to inhibit pebble pecks, RE performance differed from usual on 2 days, whereas LE chicks showed no age-dependent changes. Changes confined to the RE system, therefore, affect behaviour independently of lateralization of the ability to inhibit inappropriate response.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.bbr.2006.11.002
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_20255410</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0166432806005961</els_id><sourcerecordid>20255410</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1730-12dd2e84ce3d4288ebb812d0b945447658e5f247de7ee2ca5e9b6750af251fc23</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kD1PwzAURS0EEqXwA9g8sSU8O3aSiglVfEmVWGC2HPuFuKRxsNMK-PW4lJnpSk_3XOkdQi4Z5AxYeb3OmybkHKDMGcsB-BGZsbriWSXF4pjMUqfMRMHrU3IW4xoABEg2I6uVe-smip8jBoeDQaoHS6cOqcUd9n7c4DBR39IGO71zfht0T3s9YUr3rSfnB-oGajpn3uM5OWl1H_HiL-fk9f7uZfmYrZ4fnpa3q8ywqoCMcWs51sJgYQWva2yaOt2gWQgpRFXKGmXLRWWxQuRGS1w0ZSVBt1yy1vBiTq4Ou2PwH1uMk9q4aLDv9YB-GxUHLqVgkIrsUDTBxxiwVWNwGx2-FAO196bWKnlTe2-KMZW8JebmwGD6YOcwqGh-zVgX0EzKevcP_QP6LnYf</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>20255410</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Light experience and the development of behavioural lateralization in chicks</title><source>Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)</source><creator>Rogers, L.J. ; Andrew, R.J. ; Johnston, A.N.B.</creator><creatorcontrib>Rogers, L.J. ; Andrew, R.J. ; Johnston, A.N.B.</creatorcontrib><description>Chicks searching for food grains against a background of unfamiliar pebbles usually peck pebbles less when using the right eye (RE), or both eyes, than when using the left eye (LE), provided that the embryo's RE has been exposed to light (Li), as is normal. When pecking is fast this right/left difference is mainly due to a heightened ability of RE chicks to inhibit premature pecks (and inappropriate responses in general). Dark incubation (Da) abolishes this ability in RE chicks, and RE and LE chicks show similar frequent pebble pecks. We show now that, under conditions that cause cautious pecking, both Li and Da chicks show a new effect: in both cases LE chicks peck pebbles more than RE chicks, probably because of the novelty of pebbles. Interest in novelty in LE chicks is known to be unaffected by light in incubation. Age-dependent effects are also important. RE and LE chicks, which had either the LE or RE exposed to light before hatching, were tested on days 3, 5, 8 or 12 post-hatching, under conditions giving normal fast pecking. Artificial exposure of the embryo's LE to light reversed the lateralization: in general, chicks using the light-exposed eye performed well at all ages. Irrespective of which eye system had heightened ability to inhibit pebble pecks, RE performance differed from usual on 2 days, whereas LE chicks showed no age-dependent changes. Changes confined to the RE system, therefore, affect behaviour independently of lateralization of the ability to inhibit inappropriate response.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0166-4328</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1872-7549</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.bbr.2006.11.002</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Elsevier B.V</publisher><subject>Chicks ; Development ; Embryo ; Incubation in darkness ; Lateralization ; Light exposure ; Pebble-floor task ; Visual pathways</subject><ispartof>Behavioural brain research, 2007-02, Vol.177 (1), p.61-69</ispartof><rights>2006 Elsevier B.V.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1730-12dd2e84ce3d4288ebb812d0b945447658e5f247de7ee2ca5e9b6750af251fc23</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1730-12dd2e84ce3d4288ebb812d0b945447658e5f247de7ee2ca5e9b6750af251fc23</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bbr.2006.11.002$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>315,782,786,3554,27933,27934,46004</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Rogers, L.J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Andrew, R.J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Johnston, A.N.B.</creatorcontrib><title>Light experience and the development of behavioural lateralization in chicks</title><title>Behavioural brain research</title><description>Chicks searching for food grains against a background of unfamiliar pebbles usually peck pebbles less when using the right eye (RE), or both eyes, than when using the left eye (LE), provided that the embryo's RE has been exposed to light (Li), as is normal. When pecking is fast this right/left difference is mainly due to a heightened ability of RE chicks to inhibit premature pecks (and inappropriate responses in general). Dark incubation (Da) abolishes this ability in RE chicks, and RE and LE chicks show similar frequent pebble pecks. We show now that, under conditions that cause cautious pecking, both Li and Da chicks show a new effect: in both cases LE chicks peck pebbles more than RE chicks, probably because of the novelty of pebbles. Interest in novelty in LE chicks is known to be unaffected by light in incubation. Age-dependent effects are also important. RE and LE chicks, which had either the LE or RE exposed to light before hatching, were tested on days 3, 5, 8 or 12 post-hatching, under conditions giving normal fast pecking. Artificial exposure of the embryo's LE to light reversed the lateralization: in general, chicks using the light-exposed eye performed well at all ages. Irrespective of which eye system had heightened ability to inhibit pebble pecks, RE performance differed from usual on 2 days, whereas LE chicks showed no age-dependent changes. Changes confined to the RE system, therefore, affect behaviour independently of lateralization of the ability to inhibit inappropriate response.</description><subject>Chicks</subject><subject>Development</subject><subject>Embryo</subject><subject>Incubation in darkness</subject><subject>Lateralization</subject><subject>Light exposure</subject><subject>Pebble-floor task</subject><subject>Visual pathways</subject><issn>0166-4328</issn><issn>1872-7549</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2007</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kD1PwzAURS0EEqXwA9g8sSU8O3aSiglVfEmVWGC2HPuFuKRxsNMK-PW4lJnpSk_3XOkdQi4Z5AxYeb3OmybkHKDMGcsB-BGZsbriWSXF4pjMUqfMRMHrU3IW4xoABEg2I6uVe-smip8jBoeDQaoHS6cOqcUd9n7c4DBR39IGO71zfht0T3s9YUr3rSfnB-oGajpn3uM5OWl1H_HiL-fk9f7uZfmYrZ4fnpa3q8ywqoCMcWs51sJgYQWva2yaOt2gWQgpRFXKGmXLRWWxQuRGS1w0ZSVBt1yy1vBiTq4Ou2PwH1uMk9q4aLDv9YB-GxUHLqVgkIrsUDTBxxiwVWNwGx2-FAO196bWKnlTe2-KMZW8JebmwGD6YOcwqGh-zVgX0EzKevcP_QP6LnYf</recordid><startdate>20070212</startdate><enddate>20070212</enddate><creator>Rogers, L.J.</creator><creator>Andrew, R.J.</creator><creator>Johnston, A.N.B.</creator><general>Elsevier B.V</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7TK</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20070212</creationdate><title>Light experience and the development of behavioural lateralization in chicks</title><author>Rogers, L.J. ; Andrew, R.J. ; Johnston, A.N.B.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c1730-12dd2e84ce3d4288ebb812d0b945447658e5f247de7ee2ca5e9b6750af251fc23</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2007</creationdate><topic>Chicks</topic><topic>Development</topic><topic>Embryo</topic><topic>Incubation in darkness</topic><topic>Lateralization</topic><topic>Light exposure</topic><topic>Pebble-floor task</topic><topic>Visual pathways</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Rogers, L.J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Andrew, R.J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Johnston, A.N.B.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Behavioural brain research</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Rogers, L.J.</au><au>Andrew, R.J.</au><au>Johnston, A.N.B.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Light experience and the development of behavioural lateralization in chicks</atitle><jtitle>Behavioural brain research</jtitle><date>2007-02-12</date><risdate>2007</risdate><volume>177</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>61</spage><epage>69</epage><pages>61-69</pages><issn>0166-4328</issn><eissn>1872-7549</eissn><abstract>Chicks searching for food grains against a background of unfamiliar pebbles usually peck pebbles less when using the right eye (RE), or both eyes, than when using the left eye (LE), provided that the embryo's RE has been exposed to light (Li), as is normal. When pecking is fast this right/left difference is mainly due to a heightened ability of RE chicks to inhibit premature pecks (and inappropriate responses in general). Dark incubation (Da) abolishes this ability in RE chicks, and RE and LE chicks show similar frequent pebble pecks. We show now that, under conditions that cause cautious pecking, both Li and Da chicks show a new effect: in both cases LE chicks peck pebbles more than RE chicks, probably because of the novelty of pebbles. Interest in novelty in LE chicks is known to be unaffected by light in incubation. Age-dependent effects are also important. RE and LE chicks, which had either the LE or RE exposed to light before hatching, were tested on days 3, 5, 8 or 12 post-hatching, under conditions giving normal fast pecking. Artificial exposure of the embryo's LE to light reversed the lateralization: in general, chicks using the light-exposed eye performed well at all ages. Irrespective of which eye system had heightened ability to inhibit pebble pecks, RE performance differed from usual on 2 days, whereas LE chicks showed no age-dependent changes. Changes confined to the RE system, therefore, affect behaviour independently of lateralization of the ability to inhibit inappropriate response.</abstract><pub>Elsevier B.V</pub><doi>10.1016/j.bbr.2006.11.002</doi><tpages>9</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0166-4328
ispartof Behavioural brain research, 2007-02, Vol.177 (1), p.61-69
issn 0166-4328
1872-7549
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_20255410
source Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)
subjects Chicks
Development
Embryo
Incubation in darkness
Lateralization
Light exposure
Pebble-floor task
Visual pathways
title Light experience and the development of behavioural lateralization in chicks
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-11-30T04%3A36%3A01IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Light%20experience%20and%20the%20development%20of%20behavioural%20lateralization%20in%20chicks&rft.jtitle=Behavioural%20brain%20research&rft.au=Rogers,%20L.J.&rft.date=2007-02-12&rft.volume=177&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=61&rft.epage=69&rft.pages=61-69&rft.issn=0166-4328&rft.eissn=1872-7549&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.bbr.2006.11.002&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E20255410%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=20255410&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=S0166432806005961&rfr_iscdi=true