Fourth International Workgroup on Genotoxicity testing: Results of the in vivo Comet assay workgroup

As part of the Fourth International Workshop on Genotoxicity Testing (IWGT), held 9–10 September 2005 in San Francisco, California, an expert working group on the Comet assay was convened to review and discuss some of the procedures and methods recommended in previous documents. Particular attention...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Mutation research 2007-02, Vol.627 (1), p.31-35
Hauptverfasser: Burlinson, Brian, Tice, Raymond R., Speit, Günter, Agurell, Eva, Brendler-Schwaab, Susanne Y., Collins, Andrew R., Escobar, Patricia, Honma, Masamitsu, Kumaravel, Tirukalikundram S., Nakajima, Madoka, Sasaki, Yu F., Thybaud, Veronique, Uno, Yoshifumi, Vasquez, Marie, Hartmann, Andreas
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 35
container_issue 1
container_start_page 31
container_title Mutation research
container_volume 627
creator Burlinson, Brian
Tice, Raymond R.
Speit, Günter
Agurell, Eva
Brendler-Schwaab, Susanne Y.
Collins, Andrew R.
Escobar, Patricia
Honma, Masamitsu
Kumaravel, Tirukalikundram S.
Nakajima, Madoka
Sasaki, Yu F.
Thybaud, Veronique
Uno, Yoshifumi
Vasquez, Marie
Hartmann, Andreas
description As part of the Fourth International Workshop on Genotoxicity Testing (IWGT), held 9–10 September 2005 in San Francisco, California, an expert working group on the Comet assay was convened to review and discuss some of the procedures and methods recommended in previous documents. Particular attention was directed at the in vivo rodent, alkaline (pH >13) version of the assay. The aim was to review those protocol areas which were unclear or which required more detail in order to produce a standardized protocol with maximum acceptability by international regulatory agencies. The areas covered were: number of dose levels required, cell isolation techniques, measures of cytotoxicity, scoring of comets (i.e., manually or by image analysis), and the need for historical negative/positive control data. It was decided that a single limit dose was not sufficient although the required number of dose levels was not stipulated. The method of isolating cells was thought not to have a qualitative effect on the assay but more data were needed before a conclusion could be drawn. Concurrent measures of cytotoxicity were required with histopathological examination of tissues for necrosis or apoptosis as the “Gold Standard”. As for analysing the comets, the consensus was that image analysis was preferred but not required. Finally, the minimal number of studies required to generate a historical positive or negative control database was not defined; rather the emphasis was placed on demonstrating the stability of the negative/positive control data. It was also agreed that a minimum reporting standard would be developed which would be consistent with OECD in vivo genotoxicity test method guidelines.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.mrgentox.2006.08.011
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_20253171</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S1383571806003688</els_id><sourcerecordid>20253171</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c463t-9db875172c6b0dbc0e7e8e332f28c6e3f535fbbfc4600a5d77be482726e397913</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkE1r3DAQhkVJyVfzF4JOvdkZSbEl55SwNB8QCJSEHoUtjzfa2tJWkrfdf1-F3ZBjTiOYZ-bVPIScMygZsPpiVU5hiS75fyUHqEtQJTD2hRwzJZtCVA0_yG-hRFFJpo7ISYwrAA4C1CE5YpIxVTfymPS3fg7plT64hMG1yXrXjvSXD7-Xwc9r6h29Q-dzjjU2bWnCmKxbXtGfGOcxReoHml6RWkc3duPpwk-YaBtju6V_37d8I1-Hdox4tq-n5OX2x_Pivnh8untY3DwW5rIWqWj6TsmKSW7qDvrOAEpUKAQfuDI1iqES1dB1Q6YB2qqXssNLxSXPvUY2TJyS77u96-D_zPmnerLR4Di2Dv0cNQdeiXx7BusdaIKPMeCg18FObdhqBvrNr17pd7_6za8GpbPfPHi-T5i7CfuPsb3QDFzvAMx3biwGHY1FZ7C3AU3SvbefZfwHOOSR5g</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>20253171</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Fourth International Workgroup on Genotoxicity testing: Results of the in vivo Comet assay workgroup</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Burlinson, Brian ; Tice, Raymond R. ; Speit, Günter ; Agurell, Eva ; Brendler-Schwaab, Susanne Y. ; Collins, Andrew R. ; Escobar, Patricia ; Honma, Masamitsu ; Kumaravel, Tirukalikundram S. ; Nakajima, Madoka ; Sasaki, Yu F. ; Thybaud, Veronique ; Uno, Yoshifumi ; Vasquez, Marie ; Hartmann, Andreas</creator><creatorcontrib>Burlinson, Brian ; Tice, Raymond R. ; Speit, Günter ; Agurell, Eva ; Brendler-Schwaab, Susanne Y. ; Collins, Andrew R. ; Escobar, Patricia ; Honma, Masamitsu ; Kumaravel, Tirukalikundram S. ; Nakajima, Madoka ; Sasaki, Yu F. ; Thybaud, Veronique ; Uno, Yoshifumi ; Vasquez, Marie ; Hartmann, Andreas ; In Vivo Comet Assay Workgroup, part of the Fourth International Workgroup on Genotoxicity Testing</creatorcontrib><description>As part of the Fourth International Workshop on Genotoxicity Testing (IWGT), held 9–10 September 2005 in San Francisco, California, an expert working group on the Comet assay was convened to review and discuss some of the procedures and methods recommended in previous documents. Particular attention was directed at the in vivo rodent, alkaline (pH &gt;13) version of the assay. The aim was to review those protocol areas which were unclear or which required more detail in order to produce a standardized protocol with maximum acceptability by international regulatory agencies. The areas covered were: number of dose levels required, cell isolation techniques, measures of cytotoxicity, scoring of comets (i.e., manually or by image analysis), and the need for historical negative/positive control data. It was decided that a single limit dose was not sufficient although the required number of dose levels was not stipulated. The method of isolating cells was thought not to have a qualitative effect on the assay but more data were needed before a conclusion could be drawn. Concurrent measures of cytotoxicity were required with histopathological examination of tissues for necrosis or apoptosis as the “Gold Standard”. As for analysing the comets, the consensus was that image analysis was preferred but not required. Finally, the minimal number of studies required to generate a historical positive or negative control database was not defined; rather the emphasis was placed on demonstrating the stability of the negative/positive control data. It was also agreed that a minimum reporting standard would be developed which would be consistent with OECD in vivo genotoxicity test method guidelines.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1383-5718</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 0027-5107</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1879-3592</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.mrgentox.2006.08.011</identifier><identifier>PMID: 17118697</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Netherlands: Elsevier B.V</publisher><subject>Alkaline electrophoresis ; Animals ; Cell Separation - methods ; Comet assay ; Comet Assay - methods ; DNA damage ; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug ; Genotoxicity ; Image Processing, Computer-Assisted ; Rodentia ; Single cell gel assay</subject><ispartof>Mutation research, 2007-02, Vol.627 (1), p.31-35</ispartof><rights>2006 Elsevier B.V.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c463t-9db875172c6b0dbc0e7e8e332f28c6e3f535fbbfc4600a5d77be482726e397913</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c463t-9db875172c6b0dbc0e7e8e332f28c6e3f535fbbfc4600a5d77be482726e397913</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1383571806003688$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,27901,27902,65306</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17118697$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Burlinson, Brian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tice, Raymond R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Speit, Günter</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Agurell, Eva</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brendler-Schwaab, Susanne Y.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Collins, Andrew R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Escobar, Patricia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Honma, Masamitsu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kumaravel, Tirukalikundram S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nakajima, Madoka</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sasaki, Yu F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Thybaud, Veronique</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Uno, Yoshifumi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vasquez, Marie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hartmann, Andreas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>In Vivo Comet Assay Workgroup, part of the Fourth International Workgroup on Genotoxicity Testing</creatorcontrib><title>Fourth International Workgroup on Genotoxicity testing: Results of the in vivo Comet assay workgroup</title><title>Mutation research</title><addtitle>Mutat Res</addtitle><description>As part of the Fourth International Workshop on Genotoxicity Testing (IWGT), held 9–10 September 2005 in San Francisco, California, an expert working group on the Comet assay was convened to review and discuss some of the procedures and methods recommended in previous documents. Particular attention was directed at the in vivo rodent, alkaline (pH &gt;13) version of the assay. The aim was to review those protocol areas which were unclear or which required more detail in order to produce a standardized protocol with maximum acceptability by international regulatory agencies. The areas covered were: number of dose levels required, cell isolation techniques, measures of cytotoxicity, scoring of comets (i.e., manually or by image analysis), and the need for historical negative/positive control data. It was decided that a single limit dose was not sufficient although the required number of dose levels was not stipulated. The method of isolating cells was thought not to have a qualitative effect on the assay but more data were needed before a conclusion could be drawn. Concurrent measures of cytotoxicity were required with histopathological examination of tissues for necrosis or apoptosis as the “Gold Standard”. As for analysing the comets, the consensus was that image analysis was preferred but not required. Finally, the minimal number of studies required to generate a historical positive or negative control database was not defined; rather the emphasis was placed on demonstrating the stability of the negative/positive control data. It was also agreed that a minimum reporting standard would be developed which would be consistent with OECD in vivo genotoxicity test method guidelines.</description><subject>Alkaline electrophoresis</subject><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Cell Separation - methods</subject><subject>Comet assay</subject><subject>Comet Assay - methods</subject><subject>DNA damage</subject><subject>Dose-Response Relationship, Drug</subject><subject>Genotoxicity</subject><subject>Image Processing, Computer-Assisted</subject><subject>Rodentia</subject><subject>Single cell gel assay</subject><issn>1383-5718</issn><issn>0027-5107</issn><issn>1879-3592</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2007</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkE1r3DAQhkVJyVfzF4JOvdkZSbEl55SwNB8QCJSEHoUtjzfa2tJWkrfdf1-F3ZBjTiOYZ-bVPIScMygZsPpiVU5hiS75fyUHqEtQJTD2hRwzJZtCVA0_yG-hRFFJpo7ISYwrAA4C1CE5YpIxVTfymPS3fg7plT64hMG1yXrXjvSXD7-Xwc9r6h29Q-dzjjU2bWnCmKxbXtGfGOcxReoHml6RWkc3duPpwk-YaBtju6V_37d8I1-Hdox4tq-n5OX2x_Pivnh8untY3DwW5rIWqWj6TsmKSW7qDvrOAEpUKAQfuDI1iqES1dB1Q6YB2qqXssNLxSXPvUY2TJyS77u96-D_zPmnerLR4Di2Dv0cNQdeiXx7BusdaIKPMeCg18FObdhqBvrNr17pd7_6za8GpbPfPHi-T5i7CfuPsb3QDFzvAMx3biwGHY1FZ7C3AU3SvbefZfwHOOSR5g</recordid><startdate>20070203</startdate><enddate>20070203</enddate><creator>Burlinson, Brian</creator><creator>Tice, Raymond R.</creator><creator>Speit, Günter</creator><creator>Agurell, Eva</creator><creator>Brendler-Schwaab, Susanne Y.</creator><creator>Collins, Andrew R.</creator><creator>Escobar, Patricia</creator><creator>Honma, Masamitsu</creator><creator>Kumaravel, Tirukalikundram S.</creator><creator>Nakajima, Madoka</creator><creator>Sasaki, Yu F.</creator><creator>Thybaud, Veronique</creator><creator>Uno, Yoshifumi</creator><creator>Vasquez, Marie</creator><creator>Hartmann, Andreas</creator><general>Elsevier B.V</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7U7</scope><scope>C1K</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20070203</creationdate><title>Fourth International Workgroup on Genotoxicity testing: Results of the in vivo Comet assay workgroup</title><author>Burlinson, Brian ; Tice, Raymond R. ; Speit, Günter ; Agurell, Eva ; Brendler-Schwaab, Susanne Y. ; Collins, Andrew R. ; Escobar, Patricia ; Honma, Masamitsu ; Kumaravel, Tirukalikundram S. ; Nakajima, Madoka ; Sasaki, Yu F. ; Thybaud, Veronique ; Uno, Yoshifumi ; Vasquez, Marie ; Hartmann, Andreas</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c463t-9db875172c6b0dbc0e7e8e332f28c6e3f535fbbfc4600a5d77be482726e397913</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2007</creationdate><topic>Alkaline electrophoresis</topic><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Cell Separation - methods</topic><topic>Comet assay</topic><topic>Comet Assay - methods</topic><topic>DNA damage</topic><topic>Dose-Response Relationship, Drug</topic><topic>Genotoxicity</topic><topic>Image Processing, Computer-Assisted</topic><topic>Rodentia</topic><topic>Single cell gel assay</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Burlinson, Brian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tice, Raymond R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Speit, Günter</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Agurell, Eva</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brendler-Schwaab, Susanne Y.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Collins, Andrew R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Escobar, Patricia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Honma, Masamitsu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kumaravel, Tirukalikundram S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nakajima, Madoka</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sasaki, Yu F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Thybaud, Veronique</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Uno, Yoshifumi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vasquez, Marie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hartmann, Andreas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>In Vivo Comet Assay Workgroup, part of the Fourth International Workgroup on Genotoxicity Testing</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Toxicology Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><jtitle>Mutation research</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Burlinson, Brian</au><au>Tice, Raymond R.</au><au>Speit, Günter</au><au>Agurell, Eva</au><au>Brendler-Schwaab, Susanne Y.</au><au>Collins, Andrew R.</au><au>Escobar, Patricia</au><au>Honma, Masamitsu</au><au>Kumaravel, Tirukalikundram S.</au><au>Nakajima, Madoka</au><au>Sasaki, Yu F.</au><au>Thybaud, Veronique</au><au>Uno, Yoshifumi</au><au>Vasquez, Marie</au><au>Hartmann, Andreas</au><aucorp>In Vivo Comet Assay Workgroup, part of the Fourth International Workgroup on Genotoxicity Testing</aucorp><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Fourth International Workgroup on Genotoxicity testing: Results of the in vivo Comet assay workgroup</atitle><jtitle>Mutation research</jtitle><addtitle>Mutat Res</addtitle><date>2007-02-03</date><risdate>2007</risdate><volume>627</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>31</spage><epage>35</epage><pages>31-35</pages><issn>1383-5718</issn><issn>0027-5107</issn><eissn>1879-3592</eissn><abstract>As part of the Fourth International Workshop on Genotoxicity Testing (IWGT), held 9–10 September 2005 in San Francisco, California, an expert working group on the Comet assay was convened to review and discuss some of the procedures and methods recommended in previous documents. Particular attention was directed at the in vivo rodent, alkaline (pH &gt;13) version of the assay. The aim was to review those protocol areas which were unclear or which required more detail in order to produce a standardized protocol with maximum acceptability by international regulatory agencies. The areas covered were: number of dose levels required, cell isolation techniques, measures of cytotoxicity, scoring of comets (i.e., manually or by image analysis), and the need for historical negative/positive control data. It was decided that a single limit dose was not sufficient although the required number of dose levels was not stipulated. The method of isolating cells was thought not to have a qualitative effect on the assay but more data were needed before a conclusion could be drawn. Concurrent measures of cytotoxicity were required with histopathological examination of tissues for necrosis or apoptosis as the “Gold Standard”. As for analysing the comets, the consensus was that image analysis was preferred but not required. Finally, the minimal number of studies required to generate a historical positive or negative control database was not defined; rather the emphasis was placed on demonstrating the stability of the negative/positive control data. It was also agreed that a minimum reporting standard would be developed which would be consistent with OECD in vivo genotoxicity test method guidelines.</abstract><cop>Netherlands</cop><pub>Elsevier B.V</pub><pmid>17118697</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.mrgentox.2006.08.011</doi><tpages>5</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1383-5718
ispartof Mutation research, 2007-02, Vol.627 (1), p.31-35
issn 1383-5718
0027-5107
1879-3592
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_20253171
source MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals
subjects Alkaline electrophoresis
Animals
Cell Separation - methods
Comet assay
Comet Assay - methods
DNA damage
Dose-Response Relationship, Drug
Genotoxicity
Image Processing, Computer-Assisted
Rodentia
Single cell gel assay
title Fourth International Workgroup on Genotoxicity testing: Results of the in vivo Comet assay workgroup
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-01T16%3A04%3A49IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Fourth%20International%20Workgroup%20on%20Genotoxicity%20testing:%20Results%20of%20the%20in%20vivo%20Comet%20assay%20workgroup&rft.jtitle=Mutation%20research&rft.au=Burlinson,%20Brian&rft.aucorp=In%20Vivo%20Comet%20Assay%20Workgroup,%20part%20of%20the%20Fourth%20International%20Workgroup%20on%20Genotoxicity%20Testing&rft.date=2007-02-03&rft.volume=627&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=31&rft.epage=35&rft.pages=31-35&rft.issn=1383-5718&rft.eissn=1879-3592&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.mrgentox.2006.08.011&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E20253171%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=20253171&rft_id=info:pmid/17118697&rft_els_id=S1383571806003688&rfr_iscdi=true