Potential benefits of iridoid glycoside sequestration in Longitarsus melanocephalus (Coleoptera, Chrysomelidae)
Whenever potentially noxious plant compounds are taken up and recycled by herbivorous insects, a protective function of these sequestered compounds is assumed. The flea beetle Longitarsus melanocephalus sequesters iridoid glycosides from its host plant up to a concentration of 2% DW, yet so far it r...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Basic and applied ecology 2009-01, Vol.10 (1), p.27-33 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 33 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 27 |
container_title | Basic and applied ecology |
container_volume | 10 |
creator | Baden, C.U. Dobler, S. |
description | Whenever potentially noxious plant compounds are taken up and recycled by herbivorous insects, a protective function of these sequestered compounds is assumed. The flea beetle
Longitarsus melanocephalus sequesters iridoid glycosides from its host plant up to a concentration of 2% DW, yet so far it remained unknown whether the insects gain protection from natural enemies by sequestering plant compounds at these comparatively low concentrations. Here we tested whether iridoid glycosides might deter or inhibit various soil and litter-dwelling potential enemies and pathogens. In choice experiments presenting
L. melanocephalus pupae together with
Tribolium castaneum pupae, the predator
Lithobius forficatus was deterred by the iridoid glycoside containing pupae, while
Forficula auricularia as well as the nematode
Heterorhabditis bacteriophora were not deterred.
L. forficatus also avoided artificial baits doted with 2% iridoid glycosides while
F. auricularia showed no aversion to iridoid glycosides at these concentrations and
H. bacteriophora did not suffer any toxic effect. Of the pathogens tested, the entomopathogenic fungi
Beauveria bassiana and
Metarhizium anisopliae were not inhibited in their growth by iridoid glycosides ranging up to 2%. However, an inhibitory effect could be observed against the entomopathogenic bacterium
Bacillus thuringiensis, even at the relatively small concentrations that are common in
L. melanocephalus. The antibacterial effect might thus be another important selective value of iridoid glycoside sequestration in this species.
Immer wenn potentiell abschreckende, pflanzliche Stoffe von Insekten eingelagert werden, liegt die Vermutung nahe, dass sie diese Stoffe zu ihrem eigenen Schutz gebrauchen. Der Flohkäfer
Longitarsus melanocephalus lagert bis zu 2% seines Trockengewichts an Iridoidglykosiden ein, welche er aus seiner Futterpflanze
Plantago lanceolata aufnimmt. Bisher ist jedoch unklar, ob er durch diese vergleichsweise geringen Konzentrationen irgendeinen Schutz erlangt oder nicht. Um dies zu klären, haben wir einige boden- oder streubewohnende potentielle Feinde und Pathogene daraufhin getestet, ob sie durch Iridoidglykoside gehemmt oder abgeschreckt werden. In Futterwahlversuchen wurden den Prädatoren
Lithobius forficatus und
Forficula auricularia, sowie den entomopathogenen Nematoden
Heterorhabditis bacteriophora Puppen von
L. melanocephalus und
Tribolium castaneum angeboten. Während
L. forficatus die iridoidglykosidhaltigen |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.baae.2007.12.003 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_20244712</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S1439179107001491</els_id><sourcerecordid>20244712</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c386t-9d939e54622d10444175b88ff957cf403000ecbadd56b275a70a706c5a6e3dff3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkU1r3DAQhn1oINs0fyCX6lQS6DqjD9tr6CWYpiksNNDkLGRptKvFa20kbWD_feW45wQEg-CZmZdniuKKQkmB1re7slcKSwbQlJSVAPxTsaCCt0vatPS8-BzjDoAK4KtF4R99wjE5NZAeR7QuReItccEZ7wzZDCftozNIIr4cMaagkvMjcSNZ-3HjkgrxGMkeBzV6jYetGvL3uvMD-kPCoL6TbhtO0WfCGYU3X4ozq4aIl__rRfF8__Ope1iu__z63d2tl5qv6rRsTctbrETNmKEghKBN1a9W1rZVo22ODgCoe2VMVfesqVQD-dW6UjVyYy2_KL7Ncw_BvwWXexc1Djkn-mOUDJgQDWUfgpOn7K3NIJtBHXyMAa08BLdX4SQpyEm83MlJvJzES8pkFp-bvs5NVnmpNsFF-fyXAeWZFy3j0_4fM4HZxqvDIKN2OGo0LqBOMp_hvQX_AGOamSk</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>14031799</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Potential benefits of iridoid glycoside sequestration in Longitarsus melanocephalus (Coleoptera, Chrysomelidae)</title><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete - AutoHoldings</source><creator>Baden, C.U. ; Dobler, S.</creator><creatorcontrib>Baden, C.U. ; Dobler, S.</creatorcontrib><description>Whenever potentially noxious plant compounds are taken up and recycled by herbivorous insects, a protective function of these sequestered compounds is assumed. The flea beetle
Longitarsus melanocephalus sequesters iridoid glycosides from its host plant up to a concentration of 2% DW, yet so far it remained unknown whether the insects gain protection from natural enemies by sequestering plant compounds at these comparatively low concentrations. Here we tested whether iridoid glycosides might deter or inhibit various soil and litter-dwelling potential enemies and pathogens. In choice experiments presenting
L. melanocephalus pupae together with
Tribolium castaneum pupae, the predator
Lithobius forficatus was deterred by the iridoid glycoside containing pupae, while
Forficula auricularia as well as the nematode
Heterorhabditis bacteriophora were not deterred.
L. forficatus also avoided artificial baits doted with 2% iridoid glycosides while
F. auricularia showed no aversion to iridoid glycosides at these concentrations and
H. bacteriophora did not suffer any toxic effect. Of the pathogens tested, the entomopathogenic fungi
Beauveria bassiana and
Metarhizium anisopliae were not inhibited in their growth by iridoid glycosides ranging up to 2%. However, an inhibitory effect could be observed against the entomopathogenic bacterium
Bacillus thuringiensis, even at the relatively small concentrations that are common in
L. melanocephalus. The antibacterial effect might thus be another important selective value of iridoid glycoside sequestration in this species.
Immer wenn potentiell abschreckende, pflanzliche Stoffe von Insekten eingelagert werden, liegt die Vermutung nahe, dass sie diese Stoffe zu ihrem eigenen Schutz gebrauchen. Der Flohkäfer
Longitarsus melanocephalus lagert bis zu 2% seines Trockengewichts an Iridoidglykosiden ein, welche er aus seiner Futterpflanze
Plantago lanceolata aufnimmt. Bisher ist jedoch unklar, ob er durch diese vergleichsweise geringen Konzentrationen irgendeinen Schutz erlangt oder nicht. Um dies zu klären, haben wir einige boden- oder streubewohnende potentielle Feinde und Pathogene daraufhin getestet, ob sie durch Iridoidglykoside gehemmt oder abgeschreckt werden. In Futterwahlversuchen wurden den Prädatoren
Lithobius forficatus und
Forficula auricularia, sowie den entomopathogenen Nematoden
Heterorhabditis bacteriophora Puppen von
L. melanocephalus und
Tribolium castaneum angeboten. Während
L. forficatus die iridoidglykosidhaltigen Puppen vermied, liess sich bei den beiden anderen Testorganismen keine abschreckende Wirkung feststellen. Auch bei Versuchen mit Kunstfutter (2% Iridoidglykosidgehalt) gab es bei
L. forficatus eine abschreckende Wirkung, während bei
F. auricularia keine festzustellen war und diese Konzentration für
H. bacteriophora keine toxische Wirkung besa
β. Von den getesteten Pathogenen zeigten die entomopathogenen Pilze
Beauveria bassiana und
Metarhizium anisopliae keine Hemmung durch Konzentrationen von bis zu 2% Iridoidglykosiden. Dagegen wurde aber das entomopathogene Bakterium
Bacillus thuringiensis bereits durch die Konzentrationen, wie sie in
L. melanocephalus zu finden sind, wirksam gehemmt. Da
Bacillus thuringiensis nur ein Beispiel von vielen entomopathogenen Bodenbakterien ist, könnte der antimikrobielle Effekt ein weiterer wesentlicher selektiver Vorteil der Einlagerung von Iridoidglykosiden für
L. melanocephalus sein.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1439-1791</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.baae.2007.12.003</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Elsevier GmbH</publisher><subject>antibacterial properties ; Aucubin ; Auricularia ; Bacillus thuringiensis ; Beauveria bassiana ; Catalpol ; chemical constituents of plants ; Chemical defence ; Chrysomelidae ; Coleoptera ; entomopathogenic bacteria ; entomopathogenic fungi ; Entomopathogens ; Forficula auricularia ; Heterorhabditis bacteriophora ; host plants ; insect ecology ; Iridoid glycosides ; Lithobius forficatus ; Longitarsus ; Longitarsus melanocephalus ; Metarhizium anisopliae ; microbial growth ; Nematoda ; phytophagous insects ; plant-insect relations ; Sequestration ; Tribolium castaneum</subject><ispartof>Basic and applied ecology, 2009-01, Vol.10 (1), p.27-33</ispartof><rights>2007 Gesellschaft für Ökologie</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c386t-9d939e54622d10444175b88ff957cf403000ecbadd56b275a70a706c5a6e3dff3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c386t-9d939e54622d10444175b88ff957cf403000ecbadd56b275a70a706c5a6e3dff3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.baae.2007.12.003$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,778,782,3539,27907,27908,45978</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Baden, C.U.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dobler, S.</creatorcontrib><title>Potential benefits of iridoid glycoside sequestration in Longitarsus melanocephalus (Coleoptera, Chrysomelidae)</title><title>Basic and applied ecology</title><description>Whenever potentially noxious plant compounds are taken up and recycled by herbivorous insects, a protective function of these sequestered compounds is assumed. The flea beetle
Longitarsus melanocephalus sequesters iridoid glycosides from its host plant up to a concentration of 2% DW, yet so far it remained unknown whether the insects gain protection from natural enemies by sequestering plant compounds at these comparatively low concentrations. Here we tested whether iridoid glycosides might deter or inhibit various soil and litter-dwelling potential enemies and pathogens. In choice experiments presenting
L. melanocephalus pupae together with
Tribolium castaneum pupae, the predator
Lithobius forficatus was deterred by the iridoid glycoside containing pupae, while
Forficula auricularia as well as the nematode
Heterorhabditis bacteriophora were not deterred.
L. forficatus also avoided artificial baits doted with 2% iridoid glycosides while
F. auricularia showed no aversion to iridoid glycosides at these concentrations and
H. bacteriophora did not suffer any toxic effect. Of the pathogens tested, the entomopathogenic fungi
Beauveria bassiana and
Metarhizium anisopliae were not inhibited in their growth by iridoid glycosides ranging up to 2%. However, an inhibitory effect could be observed against the entomopathogenic bacterium
Bacillus thuringiensis, even at the relatively small concentrations that are common in
L. melanocephalus. The antibacterial effect might thus be another important selective value of iridoid glycoside sequestration in this species.
Immer wenn potentiell abschreckende, pflanzliche Stoffe von Insekten eingelagert werden, liegt die Vermutung nahe, dass sie diese Stoffe zu ihrem eigenen Schutz gebrauchen. Der Flohkäfer
Longitarsus melanocephalus lagert bis zu 2% seines Trockengewichts an Iridoidglykosiden ein, welche er aus seiner Futterpflanze
Plantago lanceolata aufnimmt. Bisher ist jedoch unklar, ob er durch diese vergleichsweise geringen Konzentrationen irgendeinen Schutz erlangt oder nicht. Um dies zu klären, haben wir einige boden- oder streubewohnende potentielle Feinde und Pathogene daraufhin getestet, ob sie durch Iridoidglykoside gehemmt oder abgeschreckt werden. In Futterwahlversuchen wurden den Prädatoren
Lithobius forficatus und
Forficula auricularia, sowie den entomopathogenen Nematoden
Heterorhabditis bacteriophora Puppen von
L. melanocephalus und
Tribolium castaneum angeboten. Während
L. forficatus die iridoidglykosidhaltigen Puppen vermied, liess sich bei den beiden anderen Testorganismen keine abschreckende Wirkung feststellen. Auch bei Versuchen mit Kunstfutter (2% Iridoidglykosidgehalt) gab es bei
L. forficatus eine abschreckende Wirkung, während bei
F. auricularia keine festzustellen war und diese Konzentration für
H. bacteriophora keine toxische Wirkung besa
β. Von den getesteten Pathogenen zeigten die entomopathogenen Pilze
Beauveria bassiana und
Metarhizium anisopliae keine Hemmung durch Konzentrationen von bis zu 2% Iridoidglykosiden. Dagegen wurde aber das entomopathogene Bakterium
Bacillus thuringiensis bereits durch die Konzentrationen, wie sie in
L. melanocephalus zu finden sind, wirksam gehemmt. Da
Bacillus thuringiensis nur ein Beispiel von vielen entomopathogenen Bodenbakterien ist, könnte der antimikrobielle Effekt ein weiterer wesentlicher selektiver Vorteil der Einlagerung von Iridoidglykosiden für
L. melanocephalus sein.</description><subject>antibacterial properties</subject><subject>Aucubin</subject><subject>Auricularia</subject><subject>Bacillus thuringiensis</subject><subject>Beauveria bassiana</subject><subject>Catalpol</subject><subject>chemical constituents of plants</subject><subject>Chemical defence</subject><subject>Chrysomelidae</subject><subject>Coleoptera</subject><subject>entomopathogenic bacteria</subject><subject>entomopathogenic fungi</subject><subject>Entomopathogens</subject><subject>Forficula auricularia</subject><subject>Heterorhabditis bacteriophora</subject><subject>host plants</subject><subject>insect ecology</subject><subject>Iridoid glycosides</subject><subject>Lithobius forficatus</subject><subject>Longitarsus</subject><subject>Longitarsus melanocephalus</subject><subject>Metarhizium anisopliae</subject><subject>microbial growth</subject><subject>Nematoda</subject><subject>phytophagous insects</subject><subject>plant-insect relations</subject><subject>Sequestration</subject><subject>Tribolium castaneum</subject><issn>1439-1791</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2009</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkU1r3DAQhn1oINs0fyCX6lQS6DqjD9tr6CWYpiksNNDkLGRptKvFa20kbWD_feW45wQEg-CZmZdniuKKQkmB1re7slcKSwbQlJSVAPxTsaCCt0vatPS8-BzjDoAK4KtF4R99wjE5NZAeR7QuReItccEZ7wzZDCftozNIIr4cMaagkvMjcSNZ-3HjkgrxGMkeBzV6jYetGvL3uvMD-kPCoL6TbhtO0WfCGYU3X4ozq4aIl__rRfF8__Ope1iu__z63d2tl5qv6rRsTctbrETNmKEghKBN1a9W1rZVo22ODgCoe2VMVfesqVQD-dW6UjVyYy2_KL7Ncw_BvwWXexc1Djkn-mOUDJgQDWUfgpOn7K3NIJtBHXyMAa08BLdX4SQpyEm83MlJvJzES8pkFp-bvs5NVnmpNsFF-fyXAeWZFy3j0_4fM4HZxqvDIKN2OGo0LqBOMp_hvQX_AGOamSk</recordid><startdate>20090101</startdate><enddate>20090101</enddate><creator>Baden, C.U.</creator><creator>Dobler, S.</creator><general>Elsevier GmbH</general><scope>FBQ</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>SOI</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>P64</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20090101</creationdate><title>Potential benefits of iridoid glycoside sequestration in Longitarsus melanocephalus (Coleoptera, Chrysomelidae)</title><author>Baden, C.U. ; Dobler, S.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c386t-9d939e54622d10444175b88ff957cf403000ecbadd56b275a70a706c5a6e3dff3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2009</creationdate><topic>antibacterial properties</topic><topic>Aucubin</topic><topic>Auricularia</topic><topic>Bacillus thuringiensis</topic><topic>Beauveria bassiana</topic><topic>Catalpol</topic><topic>chemical constituents of plants</topic><topic>Chemical defence</topic><topic>Chrysomelidae</topic><topic>Coleoptera</topic><topic>entomopathogenic bacteria</topic><topic>entomopathogenic fungi</topic><topic>Entomopathogens</topic><topic>Forficula auricularia</topic><topic>Heterorhabditis bacteriophora</topic><topic>host plants</topic><topic>insect ecology</topic><topic>Iridoid glycosides</topic><topic>Lithobius forficatus</topic><topic>Longitarsus</topic><topic>Longitarsus melanocephalus</topic><topic>Metarhizium anisopliae</topic><topic>microbial growth</topic><topic>Nematoda</topic><topic>phytophagous insects</topic><topic>plant-insect relations</topic><topic>Sequestration</topic><topic>Tribolium castaneum</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Baden, C.U.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dobler, S.</creatorcontrib><collection>AGRIS</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Basic and applied ecology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Baden, C.U.</au><au>Dobler, S.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Potential benefits of iridoid glycoside sequestration in Longitarsus melanocephalus (Coleoptera, Chrysomelidae)</atitle><jtitle>Basic and applied ecology</jtitle><date>2009-01-01</date><risdate>2009</risdate><volume>10</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>27</spage><epage>33</epage><pages>27-33</pages><issn>1439-1791</issn><abstract>Whenever potentially noxious plant compounds are taken up and recycled by herbivorous insects, a protective function of these sequestered compounds is assumed. The flea beetle
Longitarsus melanocephalus sequesters iridoid glycosides from its host plant up to a concentration of 2% DW, yet so far it remained unknown whether the insects gain protection from natural enemies by sequestering plant compounds at these comparatively low concentrations. Here we tested whether iridoid glycosides might deter or inhibit various soil and litter-dwelling potential enemies and pathogens. In choice experiments presenting
L. melanocephalus pupae together with
Tribolium castaneum pupae, the predator
Lithobius forficatus was deterred by the iridoid glycoside containing pupae, while
Forficula auricularia as well as the nematode
Heterorhabditis bacteriophora were not deterred.
L. forficatus also avoided artificial baits doted with 2% iridoid glycosides while
F. auricularia showed no aversion to iridoid glycosides at these concentrations and
H. bacteriophora did not suffer any toxic effect. Of the pathogens tested, the entomopathogenic fungi
Beauveria bassiana and
Metarhizium anisopliae were not inhibited in their growth by iridoid glycosides ranging up to 2%. However, an inhibitory effect could be observed against the entomopathogenic bacterium
Bacillus thuringiensis, even at the relatively small concentrations that are common in
L. melanocephalus. The antibacterial effect might thus be another important selective value of iridoid glycoside sequestration in this species.
Immer wenn potentiell abschreckende, pflanzliche Stoffe von Insekten eingelagert werden, liegt die Vermutung nahe, dass sie diese Stoffe zu ihrem eigenen Schutz gebrauchen. Der Flohkäfer
Longitarsus melanocephalus lagert bis zu 2% seines Trockengewichts an Iridoidglykosiden ein, welche er aus seiner Futterpflanze
Plantago lanceolata aufnimmt. Bisher ist jedoch unklar, ob er durch diese vergleichsweise geringen Konzentrationen irgendeinen Schutz erlangt oder nicht. Um dies zu klären, haben wir einige boden- oder streubewohnende potentielle Feinde und Pathogene daraufhin getestet, ob sie durch Iridoidglykoside gehemmt oder abgeschreckt werden. In Futterwahlversuchen wurden den Prädatoren
Lithobius forficatus und
Forficula auricularia, sowie den entomopathogenen Nematoden
Heterorhabditis bacteriophora Puppen von
L. melanocephalus und
Tribolium castaneum angeboten. Während
L. forficatus die iridoidglykosidhaltigen Puppen vermied, liess sich bei den beiden anderen Testorganismen keine abschreckende Wirkung feststellen. Auch bei Versuchen mit Kunstfutter (2% Iridoidglykosidgehalt) gab es bei
L. forficatus eine abschreckende Wirkung, während bei
F. auricularia keine festzustellen war und diese Konzentration für
H. bacteriophora keine toxische Wirkung besa
β. Von den getesteten Pathogenen zeigten die entomopathogenen Pilze
Beauveria bassiana und
Metarhizium anisopliae keine Hemmung durch Konzentrationen von bis zu 2% Iridoidglykosiden. Dagegen wurde aber das entomopathogene Bakterium
Bacillus thuringiensis bereits durch die Konzentrationen, wie sie in
L. melanocephalus zu finden sind, wirksam gehemmt. Da
Bacillus thuringiensis nur ein Beispiel von vielen entomopathogenen Bodenbakterien ist, könnte der antimikrobielle Effekt ein weiterer wesentlicher selektiver Vorteil der Einlagerung von Iridoidglykosiden für
L. melanocephalus sein.</abstract><pub>Elsevier GmbH</pub><doi>10.1016/j.baae.2007.12.003</doi><tpages>7</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1439-1791 |
ispartof | Basic and applied ecology, 2009-01, Vol.10 (1), p.27-33 |
issn | 1439-1791 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_20244712 |
source | Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete - AutoHoldings |
subjects | antibacterial properties Aucubin Auricularia Bacillus thuringiensis Beauveria bassiana Catalpol chemical constituents of plants Chemical defence Chrysomelidae Coleoptera entomopathogenic bacteria entomopathogenic fungi Entomopathogens Forficula auricularia Heterorhabditis bacteriophora host plants insect ecology Iridoid glycosides Lithobius forficatus Longitarsus Longitarsus melanocephalus Metarhizium anisopliae microbial growth Nematoda phytophagous insects plant-insect relations Sequestration Tribolium castaneum |
title | Potential benefits of iridoid glycoside sequestration in Longitarsus melanocephalus (Coleoptera, Chrysomelidae) |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-16T13%3A13%3A20IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Potential%20benefits%20of%20iridoid%20glycoside%20sequestration%20in%20Longitarsus%20melanocephalus%20(Coleoptera,%20Chrysomelidae)&rft.jtitle=Basic%20and%20applied%20ecology&rft.au=Baden,%20C.U.&rft.date=2009-01-01&rft.volume=10&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=27&rft.epage=33&rft.pages=27-33&rft.issn=1439-1791&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.baae.2007.12.003&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E20244712%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=14031799&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=S1439179107001491&rfr_iscdi=true |