A Retrospective Cohort Study of QuickDASH Scores for Three Hand Therapy Acute Upper Limb Conditions
Abstract Introduction The QuickDASH is a valid and reliable outcome measure widely used to assess the function and pain in arm, shoulder, and hand disabilities. A recent study introduced a QuickDASH 80% cut point test to gauge patients at risk of poor outcomes. However, the utility of this test has...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Military medicine 2018-03, Vol.183 (suppl_1), p.522-529 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 529 |
---|---|
container_issue | suppl_1 |
container_start_page | 522 |
container_title | Military medicine |
container_volume | 183 |
creator | Smith-Forbes, V Howell, Dana M Willoughby, Jason Pitts, Donald G Uhl, Tim L |
description | Abstract
Introduction
The QuickDASH is a valid and reliable outcome measure widely used to assess the function and pain in arm, shoulder, and hand disabilities. A recent study introduced a QuickDASH 80% cut point test to gauge patients at risk of poor outcomes. However, the utility of this test has not been validated.
Purpose
To determine typical QuickDASH scores for three upper limb conditions and to test the sensitivity and specificity of the QuickDASH 80% cut point test in predicting patients at risk of poor outcomes.
Methods
This is a retrospective study with a total of 406 patient records for whom QuickDASH scores were examined. The sensitivity and specificity of the QuickDASH 80% cut point test was investigated for three acute upper limb conditions seen in hand therapy: surgical distal radius fracture, nonsurgical lateral epicondylitis, and carpal tunnel release.
Results
Typical scores were determined for three upper limb conditions. The QuickDASH 80% cut point test per upper limb condition returned poor sensitivity between 28.57% and 41.67%.
Conclusion
The results did not support the QuickDASH 80% cut point test as a predictor of final outcome in these three patient populations. Patients with the worse initial 20% scores were not correctly classified as worse 20% final scores. This study provides summary data from three upper limb conditions to provide clinicians with comparison data to establish goals and educate patients. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1093/milmed/usx199 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2024015824</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><oup_id>10.1093/milmed/usx199</oup_id><sourcerecordid>2049979297</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c421t-bb4cc794d33c23486f91d5c6b79784514388950ee358827a2d4d70e206335923</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkU1r20AQhpfQ0jhJj7mGhV56UTL7JWmOxmnigCE0dqE3Ia1GRKmlVXe1pf73kXFCoIfmtMPOw8vMPIydC7gUgOqqa7cd1Vcx_BWIR2wmUEGSCvXzA5sByDTRkJljdhLCE4DQmItP7FhiqoxBM2N2zh9o9C4MZMf2D_GFe3R-5Osx1jvuGv49tvbX9Xy95GvrPAXeOM83j56IL8u-nkry5bDjcxtH4j-GgTxftV01BfV1O7auD2fsY1NuA31-eU_Z5ubbZrFMVve3d4v5KrFaijGpKm1thrpWykql87RBURubVhlmuTZCqzxHA0TK5LnMSlnrOgOSkCplUKpT9vUQO3j3O1IYi64NlrbbsicXQyFBahAml3pCv_yDPrno-2m4YuoC4J79LwUaMUOJ2UQlB8pOVwyemmLwbVf6XSGg2CsqDoqKg6KJv3hJjdX--5V-dfK2h4vDO1nP7W6ZWQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2049979297</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>A Retrospective Cohort Study of QuickDASH Scores for Three Hand Therapy Acute Upper Limb Conditions</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Oxford Academic Journals (OUP)</source><source>EZB Electronic Journals Library</source><creator>Smith-Forbes, V ; Howell, Dana M ; Willoughby, Jason ; Pitts, Donald G ; Uhl, Tim L</creator><creatorcontrib>Smith-Forbes, V ; Howell, Dana M ; Willoughby, Jason ; Pitts, Donald G ; Uhl, Tim L</creatorcontrib><description>Abstract
Introduction
The QuickDASH is a valid and reliable outcome measure widely used to assess the function and pain in arm, shoulder, and hand disabilities. A recent study introduced a QuickDASH 80% cut point test to gauge patients at risk of poor outcomes. However, the utility of this test has not been validated.
Purpose
To determine typical QuickDASH scores for three upper limb conditions and to test the sensitivity and specificity of the QuickDASH 80% cut point test in predicting patients at risk of poor outcomes.
Methods
This is a retrospective study with a total of 406 patient records for whom QuickDASH scores were examined. The sensitivity and specificity of the QuickDASH 80% cut point test was investigated for three acute upper limb conditions seen in hand therapy: surgical distal radius fracture, nonsurgical lateral epicondylitis, and carpal tunnel release.
Results
Typical scores were determined for three upper limb conditions. The QuickDASH 80% cut point test per upper limb condition returned poor sensitivity between 28.57% and 41.67%.
Conclusion
The results did not support the QuickDASH 80% cut point test as a predictor of final outcome in these three patient populations. Patients with the worse initial 20% scores were not correctly classified as worse 20% final scores. This study provides summary data from three upper limb conditions to provide clinicians with comparison data to establish goals and educate patients.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0026-4075</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1930-613X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1093/milmed/usx199</identifier><identifier>PMID: 29635595</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Oxford University Press</publisher><subject>Adolescent ; Adult ; Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Cohort analysis ; Cohort Studies ; Disability ; Female ; Fractures ; Hand - physiology ; Hand - physiopathology ; Humans ; Male ; Manipulative therapy ; Middle Aged ; Occupational Therapy - classification ; Occupational Therapy - methods ; Pain ; Patients ; Physical Functional Performance ; Quantitative psychology ; Rehabilitation ; Retrospective Studies ; Severity of Illness Index ; Shoulder ; Surgeons ; Surveys and Questionnaires ; Systematic review ; Upper Extremity - injuries ; Upper Extremity - physiopathology</subject><ispartof>Military medicine, 2018-03, Vol.183 (suppl_1), p.522-529</ispartof><rights>Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Association of Military Surgeons of the United States 2018. This work is written by (a) US Government employee(s) and is in the public domain in the US. 2018</rights><rights>Copyright Association of Military Surgeons of the United States Mar/Apr 2018</rights><rights>Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Association of Military Surgeons of the United States 2018. This work is written by (a) US Government employee(s) and is in the public domain in the US.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c421t-bb4cc794d33c23486f91d5c6b79784514388950ee358827a2d4d70e206335923</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c421t-bb4cc794d33c23486f91d5c6b79784514388950ee358827a2d4d70e206335923</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1584,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29635595$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Smith-Forbes, V</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Howell, Dana M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Willoughby, Jason</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pitts, Donald G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Uhl, Tim L</creatorcontrib><title>A Retrospective Cohort Study of QuickDASH Scores for Three Hand Therapy Acute Upper Limb Conditions</title><title>Military medicine</title><addtitle>Mil Med</addtitle><description>Abstract
Introduction
The QuickDASH is a valid and reliable outcome measure widely used to assess the function and pain in arm, shoulder, and hand disabilities. A recent study introduced a QuickDASH 80% cut point test to gauge patients at risk of poor outcomes. However, the utility of this test has not been validated.
Purpose
To determine typical QuickDASH scores for three upper limb conditions and to test the sensitivity and specificity of the QuickDASH 80% cut point test in predicting patients at risk of poor outcomes.
Methods
This is a retrospective study with a total of 406 patient records for whom QuickDASH scores were examined. The sensitivity and specificity of the QuickDASH 80% cut point test was investigated for three acute upper limb conditions seen in hand therapy: surgical distal radius fracture, nonsurgical lateral epicondylitis, and carpal tunnel release.
Results
Typical scores were determined for three upper limb conditions. The QuickDASH 80% cut point test per upper limb condition returned poor sensitivity between 28.57% and 41.67%.
Conclusion
The results did not support the QuickDASH 80% cut point test as a predictor of final outcome in these three patient populations. Patients with the worse initial 20% scores were not correctly classified as worse 20% final scores. This study provides summary data from three upper limb conditions to provide clinicians with comparison data to establish goals and educate patients.</description><subject>Adolescent</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Aged, 80 and over</subject><subject>Cohort analysis</subject><subject>Cohort Studies</subject><subject>Disability</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Fractures</subject><subject>Hand - physiology</subject><subject>Hand - physiopathology</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Manipulative therapy</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Occupational Therapy - classification</subject><subject>Occupational Therapy - methods</subject><subject>Pain</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>Physical Functional Performance</subject><subject>Quantitative psychology</subject><subject>Rehabilitation</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><subject>Severity of Illness Index</subject><subject>Shoulder</subject><subject>Surgeons</subject><subject>Surveys and Questionnaires</subject><subject>Systematic review</subject><subject>Upper Extremity - injuries</subject><subject>Upper Extremity - physiopathology</subject><issn>0026-4075</issn><issn>1930-613X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkU1r20AQhpfQ0jhJj7mGhV56UTL7JWmOxmnigCE0dqE3Ia1GRKmlVXe1pf73kXFCoIfmtMPOw8vMPIydC7gUgOqqa7cd1Vcx_BWIR2wmUEGSCvXzA5sByDTRkJljdhLCE4DQmItP7FhiqoxBM2N2zh9o9C4MZMf2D_GFe3R-5Osx1jvuGv49tvbX9Xy95GvrPAXeOM83j56IL8u-nkry5bDjcxtH4j-GgTxftV01BfV1O7auD2fsY1NuA31-eU_Z5ubbZrFMVve3d4v5KrFaijGpKm1thrpWykql87RBURubVhlmuTZCqzxHA0TK5LnMSlnrOgOSkCplUKpT9vUQO3j3O1IYi64NlrbbsicXQyFBahAml3pCv_yDPrno-2m4YuoC4J79LwUaMUOJ2UQlB8pOVwyemmLwbVf6XSGg2CsqDoqKg6KJv3hJjdX--5V-dfK2h4vDO1nP7W6ZWQ</recordid><startdate>20180301</startdate><enddate>20180301</enddate><creator>Smith-Forbes, V</creator><creator>Howell, Dana M</creator><creator>Willoughby, Jason</creator><creator>Pitts, Donald G</creator><creator>Uhl, Tim L</creator><general>Oxford University Press</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>4T-</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88F</scope><scope>88G</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8AF</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9-</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>M0R</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M1Q</scope><scope>M2M</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>S0X</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20180301</creationdate><title>A Retrospective Cohort Study of QuickDASH Scores for Three Hand Therapy Acute Upper Limb Conditions</title><author>Smith-Forbes, V ; Howell, Dana M ; Willoughby, Jason ; Pitts, Donald G ; Uhl, Tim L</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c421t-bb4cc794d33c23486f91d5c6b79784514388950ee358827a2d4d70e206335923</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Adolescent</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Aged, 80 and over</topic><topic>Cohort analysis</topic><topic>Cohort Studies</topic><topic>Disability</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Fractures</topic><topic>Hand - physiology</topic><topic>Hand - physiopathology</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Manipulative therapy</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Occupational Therapy - classification</topic><topic>Occupational Therapy - methods</topic><topic>Pain</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>Physical Functional Performance</topic><topic>Quantitative psychology</topic><topic>Rehabilitation</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><topic>Severity of Illness Index</topic><topic>Shoulder</topic><topic>Surgeons</topic><topic>Surveys and Questionnaires</topic><topic>Systematic review</topic><topic>Upper Extremity - injuries</topic><topic>Upper Extremity - physiopathology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Smith-Forbes, V</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Howell, Dana M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Willoughby, Jason</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pitts, Donald G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Uhl, Tim L</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Docstoc</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (ProQuest)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Proquest)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Military Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Psychology Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>STEM Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Public Health Database</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>eLibrary</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3)</collection><collection>Consumer Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Consumer Health Database</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Military Database (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3)</collection><collection>Psychology Database (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ProQuest Science Journals</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>SIRS Editorial</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Military medicine</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Smith-Forbes, V</au><au>Howell, Dana M</au><au>Willoughby, Jason</au><au>Pitts, Donald G</au><au>Uhl, Tim L</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>A Retrospective Cohort Study of QuickDASH Scores for Three Hand Therapy Acute Upper Limb Conditions</atitle><jtitle>Military medicine</jtitle><addtitle>Mil Med</addtitle><date>2018-03-01</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>183</volume><issue>suppl_1</issue><spage>522</spage><epage>529</epage><pages>522-529</pages><issn>0026-4075</issn><eissn>1930-613X</eissn><abstract>Abstract
Introduction
The QuickDASH is a valid and reliable outcome measure widely used to assess the function and pain in arm, shoulder, and hand disabilities. A recent study introduced a QuickDASH 80% cut point test to gauge patients at risk of poor outcomes. However, the utility of this test has not been validated.
Purpose
To determine typical QuickDASH scores for three upper limb conditions and to test the sensitivity and specificity of the QuickDASH 80% cut point test in predicting patients at risk of poor outcomes.
Methods
This is a retrospective study with a total of 406 patient records for whom QuickDASH scores were examined. The sensitivity and specificity of the QuickDASH 80% cut point test was investigated for three acute upper limb conditions seen in hand therapy: surgical distal radius fracture, nonsurgical lateral epicondylitis, and carpal tunnel release.
Results
Typical scores were determined for three upper limb conditions. The QuickDASH 80% cut point test per upper limb condition returned poor sensitivity between 28.57% and 41.67%.
Conclusion
The results did not support the QuickDASH 80% cut point test as a predictor of final outcome in these three patient populations. Patients with the worse initial 20% scores were not correctly classified as worse 20% final scores. This study provides summary data from three upper limb conditions to provide clinicians with comparison data to establish goals and educate patients.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Oxford University Press</pub><pmid>29635595</pmid><doi>10.1093/milmed/usx199</doi><tpages>8</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0026-4075 |
ispartof | Military medicine, 2018-03, Vol.183 (suppl_1), p.522-529 |
issn | 0026-4075 1930-613X |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2024015824 |
source | MEDLINE; Oxford Academic Journals (OUP); EZB Electronic Journals Library |
subjects | Adolescent Adult Aged Aged, 80 and over Cohort analysis Cohort Studies Disability Female Fractures Hand - physiology Hand - physiopathology Humans Male Manipulative therapy Middle Aged Occupational Therapy - classification Occupational Therapy - methods Pain Patients Physical Functional Performance Quantitative psychology Rehabilitation Retrospective Studies Severity of Illness Index Shoulder Surgeons Surveys and Questionnaires Systematic review Upper Extremity - injuries Upper Extremity - physiopathology |
title | A Retrospective Cohort Study of QuickDASH Scores for Three Hand Therapy Acute Upper Limb Conditions |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-07T16%3A22%3A13IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20Retrospective%20Cohort%20Study%20of%20QuickDASH%20Scores%20for%20Three%20Hand%20Therapy%20Acute%20Upper%20Limb%20Conditions&rft.jtitle=Military%20medicine&rft.au=Smith-Forbes,%20V&rft.date=2018-03-01&rft.volume=183&rft.issue=suppl_1&rft.spage=522&rft.epage=529&rft.pages=522-529&rft.issn=0026-4075&rft.eissn=1930-613X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1093/milmed/usx199&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2049979297%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2049979297&rft_id=info:pmid/29635595&rft_oup_id=10.1093/milmed/usx199&rfr_iscdi=true |