A Retrospective Cohort Study of QuickDASH Scores for Three Hand Therapy Acute Upper Limb Conditions

Abstract Introduction The QuickDASH is a valid and reliable outcome measure widely used to assess the function and pain in arm, shoulder, and hand disabilities. A recent study introduced a QuickDASH 80% cut point test to gauge patients at risk of poor outcomes. However, the utility of this test has...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Military medicine 2018-03, Vol.183 (suppl_1), p.522-529
Hauptverfasser: Smith-Forbes, V, Howell, Dana M, Willoughby, Jason, Pitts, Donald G, Uhl, Tim L
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 529
container_issue suppl_1
container_start_page 522
container_title Military medicine
container_volume 183
creator Smith-Forbes, V
Howell, Dana M
Willoughby, Jason
Pitts, Donald G
Uhl, Tim L
description Abstract Introduction The QuickDASH is a valid and reliable outcome measure widely used to assess the function and pain in arm, shoulder, and hand disabilities. A recent study introduced a QuickDASH 80% cut point test to gauge patients at risk of poor outcomes. However, the utility of this test has not been validated. Purpose To determine typical QuickDASH scores for three upper limb conditions and to test the sensitivity and specificity of the QuickDASH 80% cut point test in predicting patients at risk of poor outcomes. Methods This is a retrospective study with a total of 406 patient records for whom QuickDASH scores were examined. The sensitivity and specificity of the QuickDASH 80% cut point test was investigated for three acute upper limb conditions seen in hand therapy: surgical distal radius fracture, nonsurgical lateral epicondylitis, and carpal tunnel release. Results Typical scores were determined for three upper limb conditions. The QuickDASH 80% cut point test per upper limb condition returned poor sensitivity between 28.57% and 41.67%. Conclusion The results did not support the QuickDASH 80% cut point test as a predictor of final outcome in these three patient populations. Patients with the worse initial 20% scores were not correctly classified as worse 20% final scores. This study provides summary data from three upper limb conditions to provide clinicians with comparison data to establish goals and educate patients.
doi_str_mv 10.1093/milmed/usx199
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2024015824</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><oup_id>10.1093/milmed/usx199</oup_id><sourcerecordid>2049979297</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c421t-bb4cc794d33c23486f91d5c6b79784514388950ee358827a2d4d70e206335923</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkU1r20AQhpfQ0jhJj7mGhV56UTL7JWmOxmnigCE0dqE3Ia1GRKmlVXe1pf73kXFCoIfmtMPOw8vMPIydC7gUgOqqa7cd1Vcx_BWIR2wmUEGSCvXzA5sByDTRkJljdhLCE4DQmItP7FhiqoxBM2N2zh9o9C4MZMf2D_GFe3R-5Osx1jvuGv49tvbX9Xy95GvrPAXeOM83j56IL8u-nkry5bDjcxtH4j-GgTxftV01BfV1O7auD2fsY1NuA31-eU_Z5ubbZrFMVve3d4v5KrFaijGpKm1thrpWykql87RBURubVhlmuTZCqzxHA0TK5LnMSlnrOgOSkCplUKpT9vUQO3j3O1IYi64NlrbbsicXQyFBahAml3pCv_yDPrno-2m4YuoC4J79LwUaMUOJ2UQlB8pOVwyemmLwbVf6XSGg2CsqDoqKg6KJv3hJjdX--5V-dfK2h4vDO1nP7W6ZWQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2049979297</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>A Retrospective Cohort Study of QuickDASH Scores for Three Hand Therapy Acute Upper Limb Conditions</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Oxford Academic Journals (OUP)</source><source>EZB Electronic Journals Library</source><creator>Smith-Forbes, V ; Howell, Dana M ; Willoughby, Jason ; Pitts, Donald G ; Uhl, Tim L</creator><creatorcontrib>Smith-Forbes, V ; Howell, Dana M ; Willoughby, Jason ; Pitts, Donald G ; Uhl, Tim L</creatorcontrib><description>Abstract Introduction The QuickDASH is a valid and reliable outcome measure widely used to assess the function and pain in arm, shoulder, and hand disabilities. A recent study introduced a QuickDASH 80% cut point test to gauge patients at risk of poor outcomes. However, the utility of this test has not been validated. Purpose To determine typical QuickDASH scores for three upper limb conditions and to test the sensitivity and specificity of the QuickDASH 80% cut point test in predicting patients at risk of poor outcomes. Methods This is a retrospective study with a total of 406 patient records for whom QuickDASH scores were examined. The sensitivity and specificity of the QuickDASH 80% cut point test was investigated for three acute upper limb conditions seen in hand therapy: surgical distal radius fracture, nonsurgical lateral epicondylitis, and carpal tunnel release. Results Typical scores were determined for three upper limb conditions. The QuickDASH 80% cut point test per upper limb condition returned poor sensitivity between 28.57% and 41.67%. Conclusion The results did not support the QuickDASH 80% cut point test as a predictor of final outcome in these three patient populations. Patients with the worse initial 20% scores were not correctly classified as worse 20% final scores. This study provides summary data from three upper limb conditions to provide clinicians with comparison data to establish goals and educate patients.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0026-4075</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1930-613X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1093/milmed/usx199</identifier><identifier>PMID: 29635595</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Oxford University Press</publisher><subject>Adolescent ; Adult ; Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Cohort analysis ; Cohort Studies ; Disability ; Female ; Fractures ; Hand - physiology ; Hand - physiopathology ; Humans ; Male ; Manipulative therapy ; Middle Aged ; Occupational Therapy - classification ; Occupational Therapy - methods ; Pain ; Patients ; Physical Functional Performance ; Quantitative psychology ; Rehabilitation ; Retrospective Studies ; Severity of Illness Index ; Shoulder ; Surgeons ; Surveys and Questionnaires ; Systematic review ; Upper Extremity - injuries ; Upper Extremity - physiopathology</subject><ispartof>Military medicine, 2018-03, Vol.183 (suppl_1), p.522-529</ispartof><rights>Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Association of Military Surgeons of the United States 2018. This work is written by (a) US Government employee(s) and is in the public domain in the US. 2018</rights><rights>Copyright Association of Military Surgeons of the United States Mar/Apr 2018</rights><rights>Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Association of Military Surgeons of the United States 2018. This work is written by (a) US Government employee(s) and is in the public domain in the US.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c421t-bb4cc794d33c23486f91d5c6b79784514388950ee358827a2d4d70e206335923</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c421t-bb4cc794d33c23486f91d5c6b79784514388950ee358827a2d4d70e206335923</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1584,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29635595$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Smith-Forbes, V</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Howell, Dana M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Willoughby, Jason</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pitts, Donald G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Uhl, Tim L</creatorcontrib><title>A Retrospective Cohort Study of QuickDASH Scores for Three Hand Therapy Acute Upper Limb Conditions</title><title>Military medicine</title><addtitle>Mil Med</addtitle><description>Abstract Introduction The QuickDASH is a valid and reliable outcome measure widely used to assess the function and pain in arm, shoulder, and hand disabilities. A recent study introduced a QuickDASH 80% cut point test to gauge patients at risk of poor outcomes. However, the utility of this test has not been validated. Purpose To determine typical QuickDASH scores for three upper limb conditions and to test the sensitivity and specificity of the QuickDASH 80% cut point test in predicting patients at risk of poor outcomes. Methods This is a retrospective study with a total of 406 patient records for whom QuickDASH scores were examined. The sensitivity and specificity of the QuickDASH 80% cut point test was investigated for three acute upper limb conditions seen in hand therapy: surgical distal radius fracture, nonsurgical lateral epicondylitis, and carpal tunnel release. Results Typical scores were determined for three upper limb conditions. The QuickDASH 80% cut point test per upper limb condition returned poor sensitivity between 28.57% and 41.67%. Conclusion The results did not support the QuickDASH 80% cut point test as a predictor of final outcome in these three patient populations. Patients with the worse initial 20% scores were not correctly classified as worse 20% final scores. This study provides summary data from three upper limb conditions to provide clinicians with comparison data to establish goals and educate patients.</description><subject>Adolescent</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Aged, 80 and over</subject><subject>Cohort analysis</subject><subject>Cohort Studies</subject><subject>Disability</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Fractures</subject><subject>Hand - physiology</subject><subject>Hand - physiopathology</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Manipulative therapy</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Occupational Therapy - classification</subject><subject>Occupational Therapy - methods</subject><subject>Pain</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>Physical Functional Performance</subject><subject>Quantitative psychology</subject><subject>Rehabilitation</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><subject>Severity of Illness Index</subject><subject>Shoulder</subject><subject>Surgeons</subject><subject>Surveys and Questionnaires</subject><subject>Systematic review</subject><subject>Upper Extremity - injuries</subject><subject>Upper Extremity - physiopathology</subject><issn>0026-4075</issn><issn>1930-613X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkU1r20AQhpfQ0jhJj7mGhV56UTL7JWmOxmnigCE0dqE3Ia1GRKmlVXe1pf73kXFCoIfmtMPOw8vMPIydC7gUgOqqa7cd1Vcx_BWIR2wmUEGSCvXzA5sByDTRkJljdhLCE4DQmItP7FhiqoxBM2N2zh9o9C4MZMf2D_GFe3R-5Osx1jvuGv49tvbX9Xy95GvrPAXeOM83j56IL8u-nkry5bDjcxtH4j-GgTxftV01BfV1O7auD2fsY1NuA31-eU_Z5ubbZrFMVve3d4v5KrFaijGpKm1thrpWykql87RBURubVhlmuTZCqzxHA0TK5LnMSlnrOgOSkCplUKpT9vUQO3j3O1IYi64NlrbbsicXQyFBahAml3pCv_yDPrno-2m4YuoC4J79LwUaMUOJ2UQlB8pOVwyemmLwbVf6XSGg2CsqDoqKg6KJv3hJjdX--5V-dfK2h4vDO1nP7W6ZWQ</recordid><startdate>20180301</startdate><enddate>20180301</enddate><creator>Smith-Forbes, V</creator><creator>Howell, Dana M</creator><creator>Willoughby, Jason</creator><creator>Pitts, Donald G</creator><creator>Uhl, Tim L</creator><general>Oxford University Press</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>4T-</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88F</scope><scope>88G</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8AF</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9-</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>M0R</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M1Q</scope><scope>M2M</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>S0X</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20180301</creationdate><title>A Retrospective Cohort Study of QuickDASH Scores for Three Hand Therapy Acute Upper Limb Conditions</title><author>Smith-Forbes, V ; Howell, Dana M ; Willoughby, Jason ; Pitts, Donald G ; Uhl, Tim L</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c421t-bb4cc794d33c23486f91d5c6b79784514388950ee358827a2d4d70e206335923</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Adolescent</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Aged, 80 and over</topic><topic>Cohort analysis</topic><topic>Cohort Studies</topic><topic>Disability</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Fractures</topic><topic>Hand - physiology</topic><topic>Hand - physiopathology</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Manipulative therapy</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Occupational Therapy - classification</topic><topic>Occupational Therapy - methods</topic><topic>Pain</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>Physical Functional Performance</topic><topic>Quantitative psychology</topic><topic>Rehabilitation</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><topic>Severity of Illness Index</topic><topic>Shoulder</topic><topic>Surgeons</topic><topic>Surveys and Questionnaires</topic><topic>Systematic review</topic><topic>Upper Extremity - injuries</topic><topic>Upper Extremity - physiopathology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Smith-Forbes, V</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Howell, Dana M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Willoughby, Jason</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pitts, Donald G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Uhl, Tim L</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Docstoc</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database (ProQuest)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Proquest)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Military Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Psychology Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>STEM Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Public Health Database</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>eLibrary</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3)</collection><collection>Consumer Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Consumer Health Database</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Military Database (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3)</collection><collection>Psychology Database (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ProQuest Science Journals</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>SIRS Editorial</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Military medicine</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Smith-Forbes, V</au><au>Howell, Dana M</au><au>Willoughby, Jason</au><au>Pitts, Donald G</au><au>Uhl, Tim L</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>A Retrospective Cohort Study of QuickDASH Scores for Three Hand Therapy Acute Upper Limb Conditions</atitle><jtitle>Military medicine</jtitle><addtitle>Mil Med</addtitle><date>2018-03-01</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>183</volume><issue>suppl_1</issue><spage>522</spage><epage>529</epage><pages>522-529</pages><issn>0026-4075</issn><eissn>1930-613X</eissn><abstract>Abstract Introduction The QuickDASH is a valid and reliable outcome measure widely used to assess the function and pain in arm, shoulder, and hand disabilities. A recent study introduced a QuickDASH 80% cut point test to gauge patients at risk of poor outcomes. However, the utility of this test has not been validated. Purpose To determine typical QuickDASH scores for three upper limb conditions and to test the sensitivity and specificity of the QuickDASH 80% cut point test in predicting patients at risk of poor outcomes. Methods This is a retrospective study with a total of 406 patient records for whom QuickDASH scores were examined. The sensitivity and specificity of the QuickDASH 80% cut point test was investigated for three acute upper limb conditions seen in hand therapy: surgical distal radius fracture, nonsurgical lateral epicondylitis, and carpal tunnel release. Results Typical scores were determined for three upper limb conditions. The QuickDASH 80% cut point test per upper limb condition returned poor sensitivity between 28.57% and 41.67%. Conclusion The results did not support the QuickDASH 80% cut point test as a predictor of final outcome in these three patient populations. Patients with the worse initial 20% scores were not correctly classified as worse 20% final scores. This study provides summary data from three upper limb conditions to provide clinicians with comparison data to establish goals and educate patients.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Oxford University Press</pub><pmid>29635595</pmid><doi>10.1093/milmed/usx199</doi><tpages>8</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0026-4075
ispartof Military medicine, 2018-03, Vol.183 (suppl_1), p.522-529
issn 0026-4075
1930-613X
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2024015824
source MEDLINE; Oxford Academic Journals (OUP); EZB Electronic Journals Library
subjects Adolescent
Adult
Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Cohort analysis
Cohort Studies
Disability
Female
Fractures
Hand - physiology
Hand - physiopathology
Humans
Male
Manipulative therapy
Middle Aged
Occupational Therapy - classification
Occupational Therapy - methods
Pain
Patients
Physical Functional Performance
Quantitative psychology
Rehabilitation
Retrospective Studies
Severity of Illness Index
Shoulder
Surgeons
Surveys and Questionnaires
Systematic review
Upper Extremity - injuries
Upper Extremity - physiopathology
title A Retrospective Cohort Study of QuickDASH Scores for Three Hand Therapy Acute Upper Limb Conditions
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-07T16%3A22%3A13IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20Retrospective%20Cohort%20Study%20of%20QuickDASH%20Scores%20for%20Three%20Hand%20Therapy%20Acute%20Upper%20Limb%20Conditions&rft.jtitle=Military%20medicine&rft.au=Smith-Forbes,%20V&rft.date=2018-03-01&rft.volume=183&rft.issue=suppl_1&rft.spage=522&rft.epage=529&rft.pages=522-529&rft.issn=0026-4075&rft.eissn=1930-613X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1093/milmed/usx199&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2049979297%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2049979297&rft_id=info:pmid/29635595&rft_oup_id=10.1093/milmed/usx199&rfr_iscdi=true