Temporal response of soil biochemical properties in a pastoral soil after cultivation following high application rates of undigested sewage sludge
Soil biochemical properties were measured annually between 1995 and 1999 in soil from an 8-ha site that had received over 1,000 wet tonnes ha^sup -1^ undigested sewage sludge, 1-4 years earlier. Basal respiration generally declined with time and was usually greatest in the untreated control area. Th...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Biology and fertility of soils 2003-10, Vol.38 (6), p.377-385 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 385 |
---|---|
container_issue | 6 |
container_start_page | 377 |
container_title | Biology and fertility of soils |
container_volume | 38 |
creator | SPEIR, T. W VAN SCHAIK, A. P LLOYD-JONES, A. R KETTLES, H. A |
description | Soil biochemical properties were measured annually between 1995 and 1999 in soil from an 8-ha site that had received over 1,000 wet tonnes ha^sup -1^ undigested sewage sludge, 1-4 years earlier. Basal respiration generally declined with time and was usually greatest in the untreated control area. This trend was attributed to a similar trend in soil moisture content. In contrast, microbial biomass C increased with time and also generally increased with sludge treatment age. Microbial biomass C, and to a lesser extent sulphatase activity, accurately predicted the order of sludge application to the site. This was perceived as a function of time since tillage and pasture establishment, with activities increasing in parallel to the build up of C residues in the soil, and not an effect of sludge or its composition. Except immediately after sludge application, there was no effect on N mineralisation and nitrification. None of the biochemical properties was strongly correlated with heavy metal concentrations. Our results suggest that there was little effect on soil biochemical properties, either adverse or beneficial, of adding raw sewage sludge to this site. Although a companion study showed considerable mobility and plant uptake of heavy metals, this difference could mainly be attributed to a different sampling strategy and the effects of intensive liming of the site.[PUBLICATION ABSTRACT] |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s00374-003-0656-8 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_20234826</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>20234826</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c331t-e13f1e85c208cf132a45719e78f66b1e88be6b474c98fc86806b91ab1828a6d83</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdkc2O1DAQhCO0SMwuPAA3CwluAf8kdueIVvxJK3FZzpbjaWe88sTBnbDiNXhiPDMrIXFpH-rrctnVNK8Ffy84Nx-Ic2W6ts6W61638KzZiU7JlhsYrpodFwZaabR80VwTPXAuehDDrvlzj8clF5dYQVryTMhyYJRjYmPM_oDH6Ku4lLxgWSMSizNzbHG0nrfOpAsrFua3tMZfbo15ZiGnlB_jPLFDnA7MLUuqPmepuLW61Eu2eR8npBX3jPDRTcgobfsJXzbPg0uEr57Om-bH50_3t1_bu-9fvt1-vGu9UmJtUaggEHovOfgglHRdb8SABoLWY1VgRD12pvMDBA8auB4H4UYBEpzeg7pp3l186-N-bjWIPUbymJKbMW9kJZeqA6kr-OY_8CFvZa7ZrBZK9QC9qZC4QL5kooLBLiUeXfltBbeniuylIlunPVVkTwnePhk7qr8cipt9pH-LvRiUAqX-As-wlBc</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>613358857</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Temporal response of soil biochemical properties in a pastoral soil after cultivation following high application rates of undigested sewage sludge</title><source>SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings</source><creator>SPEIR, T. W ; VAN SCHAIK, A. P ; LLOYD-JONES, A. R ; KETTLES, H. A</creator><creatorcontrib>SPEIR, T. W ; VAN SCHAIK, A. P ; LLOYD-JONES, A. R ; KETTLES, H. A</creatorcontrib><description>Soil biochemical properties were measured annually between 1995 and 1999 in soil from an 8-ha site that had received over 1,000 wet tonnes ha^sup -1^ undigested sewage sludge, 1-4 years earlier. Basal respiration generally declined with time and was usually greatest in the untreated control area. This trend was attributed to a similar trend in soil moisture content. In contrast, microbial biomass C increased with time and also generally increased with sludge treatment age. Microbial biomass C, and to a lesser extent sulphatase activity, accurately predicted the order of sludge application to the site. This was perceived as a function of time since tillage and pasture establishment, with activities increasing in parallel to the build up of C residues in the soil, and not an effect of sludge or its composition. Except immediately after sludge application, there was no effect on N mineralisation and nitrification. None of the biochemical properties was strongly correlated with heavy metal concentrations. Our results suggest that there was little effect on soil biochemical properties, either adverse or beneficial, of adding raw sewage sludge to this site. Although a companion study showed considerable mobility and plant uptake of heavy metals, this difference could mainly be attributed to a different sampling strategy and the effects of intensive liming of the site.[PUBLICATION ABSTRACT]</description><identifier>ISSN: 0178-2762</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1432-0789</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s00374-003-0656-8</identifier><identifier>CODEN: BFSOEE</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Berlin: Springer</publisher><subject>Absorption ; Agronomy. Soil science and plant productions ; Biological and medical sciences ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; Heavy metals ; Metal concentrations ; Mineralization ; Moisture content ; Nitrification ; Pasture ; Sewage sludge ; Sludge ; Sludge treatment ; Soil moisture ; Soil science ; Soils</subject><ispartof>Biology and fertility of soils, 2003-10, Vol.38 (6), p.377-385</ispartof><rights>2004 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Springer-Verlag 2003</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c331t-e13f1e85c208cf132a45719e78f66b1e88be6b474c98fc86806b91ab1828a6d83</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27922,27923</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=15193383$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>SPEIR, T. W</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>VAN SCHAIK, A. P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>LLOYD-JONES, A. R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>KETTLES, H. A</creatorcontrib><title>Temporal response of soil biochemical properties in a pastoral soil after cultivation following high application rates of undigested sewage sludge</title><title>Biology and fertility of soils</title><description>Soil biochemical properties were measured annually between 1995 and 1999 in soil from an 8-ha site that had received over 1,000 wet tonnes ha^sup -1^ undigested sewage sludge, 1-4 years earlier. Basal respiration generally declined with time and was usually greatest in the untreated control area. This trend was attributed to a similar trend in soil moisture content. In contrast, microbial biomass C increased with time and also generally increased with sludge treatment age. Microbial biomass C, and to a lesser extent sulphatase activity, accurately predicted the order of sludge application to the site. This was perceived as a function of time since tillage and pasture establishment, with activities increasing in parallel to the build up of C residues in the soil, and not an effect of sludge or its composition. Except immediately after sludge application, there was no effect on N mineralisation and nitrification. None of the biochemical properties was strongly correlated with heavy metal concentrations. Our results suggest that there was little effect on soil biochemical properties, either adverse or beneficial, of adding raw sewage sludge to this site. Although a companion study showed considerable mobility and plant uptake of heavy metals, this difference could mainly be attributed to a different sampling strategy and the effects of intensive liming of the site.[PUBLICATION ABSTRACT]</description><subject>Absorption</subject><subject>Agronomy. Soil science and plant productions</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>Heavy metals</subject><subject>Metal concentrations</subject><subject>Mineralization</subject><subject>Moisture content</subject><subject>Nitrification</subject><subject>Pasture</subject><subject>Sewage sludge</subject><subject>Sludge</subject><subject>Sludge treatment</subject><subject>Soil moisture</subject><subject>Soil science</subject><subject>Soils</subject><issn>0178-2762</issn><issn>1432-0789</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2003</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNpdkc2O1DAQhCO0SMwuPAA3CwluAf8kdueIVvxJK3FZzpbjaWe88sTBnbDiNXhiPDMrIXFpH-rrctnVNK8Ffy84Nx-Ic2W6ts6W61638KzZiU7JlhsYrpodFwZaabR80VwTPXAuehDDrvlzj8clF5dYQVryTMhyYJRjYmPM_oDH6Ku4lLxgWSMSizNzbHG0nrfOpAsrFua3tMZfbo15ZiGnlB_jPLFDnA7MLUuqPmepuLW61Eu2eR8npBX3jPDRTcgobfsJXzbPg0uEr57Om-bH50_3t1_bu-9fvt1-vGu9UmJtUaggEHovOfgglHRdb8SABoLWY1VgRD12pvMDBA8auB4H4UYBEpzeg7pp3l186-N-bjWIPUbymJKbMW9kJZeqA6kr-OY_8CFvZa7ZrBZK9QC9qZC4QL5kooLBLiUeXfltBbeniuylIlunPVVkTwnePhk7qr8cipt9pH-LvRiUAqX-As-wlBc</recordid><startdate>20031001</startdate><enddate>20031001</enddate><creator>SPEIR, T. W</creator><creator>VAN SCHAIK, A. P</creator><creator>LLOYD-JONES, A. R</creator><creator>KETTLES, H. A</creator><general>Springer</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H95</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7QO</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20031001</creationdate><title>Temporal response of soil biochemical properties in a pastoral soil after cultivation following high application rates of undigested sewage sludge</title><author>SPEIR, T. W ; VAN SCHAIK, A. P ; LLOYD-JONES, A. R ; KETTLES, H. A</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c331t-e13f1e85c208cf132a45719e78f66b1e88be6b474c98fc86806b91ab1828a6d83</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2003</creationdate><topic>Absorption</topic><topic>Agronomy. Soil science and plant productions</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>Heavy metals</topic><topic>Metal concentrations</topic><topic>Mineralization</topic><topic>Moisture content</topic><topic>Nitrification</topic><topic>Pasture</topic><topic>Sewage sludge</topic><topic>Sludge</topic><topic>Sludge treatment</topic><topic>Soil moisture</topic><topic>Soil science</topic><topic>Soils</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>SPEIR, T. W</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>VAN SCHAIK, A. P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>LLOYD-JONES, A. R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>KETTLES, H. A</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 1: Biological Sciences & Living Resources</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Database</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Biology and fertility of soils</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>SPEIR, T. W</au><au>VAN SCHAIK, A. P</au><au>LLOYD-JONES, A. R</au><au>KETTLES, H. A</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Temporal response of soil biochemical properties in a pastoral soil after cultivation following high application rates of undigested sewage sludge</atitle><jtitle>Biology and fertility of soils</jtitle><date>2003-10-01</date><risdate>2003</risdate><volume>38</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>377</spage><epage>385</epage><pages>377-385</pages><issn>0178-2762</issn><eissn>1432-0789</eissn><coden>BFSOEE</coden><abstract>Soil biochemical properties were measured annually between 1995 and 1999 in soil from an 8-ha site that had received over 1,000 wet tonnes ha^sup -1^ undigested sewage sludge, 1-4 years earlier. Basal respiration generally declined with time and was usually greatest in the untreated control area. This trend was attributed to a similar trend in soil moisture content. In contrast, microbial biomass C increased with time and also generally increased with sludge treatment age. Microbial biomass C, and to a lesser extent sulphatase activity, accurately predicted the order of sludge application to the site. This was perceived as a function of time since tillage and pasture establishment, with activities increasing in parallel to the build up of C residues in the soil, and not an effect of sludge or its composition. Except immediately after sludge application, there was no effect on N mineralisation and nitrification. None of the biochemical properties was strongly correlated with heavy metal concentrations. Our results suggest that there was little effect on soil biochemical properties, either adverse or beneficial, of adding raw sewage sludge to this site. Although a companion study showed considerable mobility and plant uptake of heavy metals, this difference could mainly be attributed to a different sampling strategy and the effects of intensive liming of the site.[PUBLICATION ABSTRACT]</abstract><cop>Berlin</cop><pub>Springer</pub><doi>10.1007/s00374-003-0656-8</doi><tpages>9</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0178-2762 |
ispartof | Biology and fertility of soils, 2003-10, Vol.38 (6), p.377-385 |
issn | 0178-2762 1432-0789 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_20234826 |
source | SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings |
subjects | Absorption Agronomy. Soil science and plant productions Biological and medical sciences Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology Heavy metals Metal concentrations Mineralization Moisture content Nitrification Pasture Sewage sludge Sludge Sludge treatment Soil moisture Soil science Soils |
title | Temporal response of soil biochemical properties in a pastoral soil after cultivation following high application rates of undigested sewage sludge |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-14T12%3A21%3A57IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Temporal%20response%20of%20soil%20biochemical%20properties%20in%20a%20pastoral%20soil%20after%20cultivation%20following%20high%20application%20rates%20of%20undigested%20sewage%20sludge&rft.jtitle=Biology%20and%20fertility%20of%20soils&rft.au=SPEIR,%20T.%20W&rft.date=2003-10-01&rft.volume=38&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=377&rft.epage=385&rft.pages=377-385&rft.issn=0178-2762&rft.eissn=1432-0789&rft.coden=BFSOEE&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s00374-003-0656-8&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E20234826%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=613358857&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |