Four simple ways to increase power without increasing the sample size
Underpowered experiments have three problems: true effects are harder to detect, the true effects that are detected tend to have inflated effect sizes and as power decreases so does the probability that a statistically significant result represents a true effect. Many biology experiments are underpo...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Laboratory animals (London) 2018-12, Vol.52 (6), p.621-629 |
---|---|
1. Verfasser: | |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 629 |
---|---|
container_issue | 6 |
container_start_page | 621 |
container_title | Laboratory animals (London) |
container_volume | 52 |
creator | Lazic, Stanley E |
description | Underpowered experiments have three problems: true effects are harder to detect, the true effects that are detected tend to have inflated effect sizes and as power decreases so does the probability that a statistically significant result represents a true effect. Many biology experiments are underpowered and recent calls to change the traditional 0.05 significance threshold to a more stringent value of 0.005 will further reduce the power of the average experiment. Increasing power by increasing the sample size is often the only option considered, but more samples increases costs, makes the experiment harder to conduct and is contrary to the 3Rs principles for animal research. We show how the design of an experiment and some analytical decisions can have a surprisingly large effect on power. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1177/0023677218767478 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2023409215</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sage_id>10.1177_0023677218767478</sage_id><sourcerecordid>2023409215</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c337t-e436ee7d611027fb324992676615aef03e961dd1b8b42dc715a2bbaf5e9b78523</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1UM9LwzAUDqK4Or17khy9VJO0TdqjjE2FgRc9h6R93TLapiYtY_71Zm7zIAgPHu99P3jvQ-iWkgdKhXgkhCVcCEZzwUUq8jMUUZHlMQ3oOYr2cLzHJ-jK-00YaZqTSzRhBQ9FeYTmCzs67E3bN4C3aufxYLHpSgfKA-7tFhzemmFtx-G0Nt0KD2vAXv2IvPmCa3RRq8bDzbFP0cdi_j57iZdvz6-zp2VcJokYYkgTDiAqTilhotYJS4uCccE5zRTUJIFwVFVRneuUVaUIW6a1qjMotMgzlkzR_cG3d_ZzBD_I1vgSmkZ1YEcvWXg4JQWjWaCSA7V01nsHteydaZXbSUrkPjz5N7wguTu6j7qF6ldwSisQ4gPBqxXITUiuC9_-b_gN6up2Gw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2023409215</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Four simple ways to increase power without increasing the sample size</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>SAGE Complete A-Z List</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><creator>Lazic, Stanley E</creator><creatorcontrib>Lazic, Stanley E</creatorcontrib><description>Underpowered experiments have three problems: true effects are harder to detect, the true effects that are detected tend to have inflated effect sizes and as power decreases so does the probability that a statistically significant result represents a true effect. Many biology experiments are underpowered and recent calls to change the traditional 0.05 significance threshold to a more stringent value of 0.005 will further reduce the power of the average experiment. Increasing power by increasing the sample size is often the only option considered, but more samples increases costs, makes the experiment harder to conduct and is contrary to the 3Rs principles for animal research. We show how the design of an experiment and some analytical decisions can have a surprisingly large effect on power.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0023-6772</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1758-1117</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/0023677218767478</identifier><identifier>PMID: 29629616</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London, England: SAGE Publications</publisher><subject>Animal Experimentation ; Animals ; Biomedical Research - methods ; Models, Statistical ; Reproducibility of Results ; Sample Size</subject><ispartof>Laboratory animals (London), 2018-12, Vol.52 (6), p.621-629</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2018</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c337t-e436ee7d611027fb324992676615aef03e961dd1b8b42dc715a2bbaf5e9b78523</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c337t-e436ee7d611027fb324992676615aef03e961dd1b8b42dc715a2bbaf5e9b78523</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-3409-3407</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/0023677218767478$$EPDF$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0023677218767478$$EHTML$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,21818,27923,27924,43620,43621</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29629616$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Lazic, Stanley E</creatorcontrib><title>Four simple ways to increase power without increasing the sample size</title><title>Laboratory animals (London)</title><addtitle>Lab Anim</addtitle><description>Underpowered experiments have three problems: true effects are harder to detect, the true effects that are detected tend to have inflated effect sizes and as power decreases so does the probability that a statistically significant result represents a true effect. Many biology experiments are underpowered and recent calls to change the traditional 0.05 significance threshold to a more stringent value of 0.005 will further reduce the power of the average experiment. Increasing power by increasing the sample size is often the only option considered, but more samples increases costs, makes the experiment harder to conduct and is contrary to the 3Rs principles for animal research. We show how the design of an experiment and some analytical decisions can have a surprisingly large effect on power.</description><subject>Animal Experimentation</subject><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Biomedical Research - methods</subject><subject>Models, Statistical</subject><subject>Reproducibility of Results</subject><subject>Sample Size</subject><issn>0023-6772</issn><issn>1758-1117</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp1UM9LwzAUDqK4Or17khy9VJO0TdqjjE2FgRc9h6R93TLapiYtY_71Zm7zIAgPHu99P3jvQ-iWkgdKhXgkhCVcCEZzwUUq8jMUUZHlMQ3oOYr2cLzHJ-jK-00YaZqTSzRhBQ9FeYTmCzs67E3bN4C3aufxYLHpSgfKA-7tFhzemmFtx-G0Nt0KD2vAXv2IvPmCa3RRq8bDzbFP0cdi_j57iZdvz6-zp2VcJokYYkgTDiAqTilhotYJS4uCccE5zRTUJIFwVFVRneuUVaUIW6a1qjMotMgzlkzR_cG3d_ZzBD_I1vgSmkZ1YEcvWXg4JQWjWaCSA7V01nsHteydaZXbSUrkPjz5N7wguTu6j7qF6ldwSisQ4gPBqxXITUiuC9_-b_gN6up2Gw</recordid><startdate>201812</startdate><enddate>201812</enddate><creator>Lazic, Stanley E</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3409-3407</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>201812</creationdate><title>Four simple ways to increase power without increasing the sample size</title><author>Lazic, Stanley E</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c337t-e436ee7d611027fb324992676615aef03e961dd1b8b42dc715a2bbaf5e9b78523</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Animal Experimentation</topic><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Biomedical Research - methods</topic><topic>Models, Statistical</topic><topic>Reproducibility of Results</topic><topic>Sample Size</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Lazic, Stanley E</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Laboratory animals (London)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Lazic, Stanley E</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Four simple ways to increase power without increasing the sample size</atitle><jtitle>Laboratory animals (London)</jtitle><addtitle>Lab Anim</addtitle><date>2018-12</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>52</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>621</spage><epage>629</epage><pages>621-629</pages><issn>0023-6772</issn><eissn>1758-1117</eissn><abstract>Underpowered experiments have three problems: true effects are harder to detect, the true effects that are detected tend to have inflated effect sizes and as power decreases so does the probability that a statistically significant result represents a true effect. Many biology experiments are underpowered and recent calls to change the traditional 0.05 significance threshold to a more stringent value of 0.005 will further reduce the power of the average experiment. Increasing power by increasing the sample size is often the only option considered, but more samples increases costs, makes the experiment harder to conduct and is contrary to the 3Rs principles for animal research. We show how the design of an experiment and some analytical decisions can have a surprisingly large effect on power.</abstract><cop>London, England</cop><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><pmid>29629616</pmid><doi>10.1177/0023677218767478</doi><tpages>9</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3409-3407</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0023-6772 |
ispartof | Laboratory animals (London), 2018-12, Vol.52 (6), p.621-629 |
issn | 0023-6772 1758-1117 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2023409215 |
source | MEDLINE; SAGE Complete A-Z List; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals |
subjects | Animal Experimentation Animals Biomedical Research - methods Models, Statistical Reproducibility of Results Sample Size |
title | Four simple ways to increase power without increasing the sample size |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-09T03%3A12%3A28IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Four%20simple%20ways%20to%20increase%20power%20without%20increasing%20the%20sample%20size&rft.jtitle=Laboratory%20animals%20(London)&rft.au=Lazic,%20Stanley%20E&rft.date=2018-12&rft.volume=52&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=621&rft.epage=629&rft.pages=621-629&rft.issn=0023-6772&rft.eissn=1758-1117&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/0023677218767478&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2023409215%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2023409215&rft_id=info:pmid/29629616&rft_sage_id=10.1177_0023677218767478&rfr_iscdi=true |