Implementation of a generic liquid chromatographic method development workflow: Application to the analysis of phytocannabinoids and Cannabis sativa extracts

•A generic RPLC method development workflow was proposed.•Screening, optimization, virtual refinement and virtual robustness testing were done.•This workflow was applied to phytocannabinoids and Cannabis sativa extracts.•This whole procedure takes only around 4 days of work. A generic liquid chromat...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of pharmaceutical and biomedical analysis 2018-06, Vol.155, p.116-124
Hauptverfasser: Fekete, Szabolcs, Sadat-Noorbakhsh, Vida, Schelling, Cedric, Molnár, Imre, Guillarme, Davy, Rudaz, Serge, Veuthey, Jean-Luc
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 124
container_issue
container_start_page 116
container_title Journal of pharmaceutical and biomedical analysis
container_volume 155
creator Fekete, Szabolcs
Sadat-Noorbakhsh, Vida
Schelling, Cedric
Molnár, Imre
Guillarme, Davy
Rudaz, Serge
Veuthey, Jean-Luc
description •A generic RPLC method development workflow was proposed.•Screening, optimization, virtual refinement and virtual robustness testing were done.•This workflow was applied to phytocannabinoids and Cannabis sativa extracts.•This whole procedure takes only around 4 days of work. A generic liquid chromatographic method development workflow was developed and successfully applied to the analysis of phytocannabinoids and Cannabis sativa extracts. Our method development procedure consists in four steps: i)The screening of primary parameters (i.e. stationary phase nature, organic modifier nature and approximate mobile phase pH) was carried out with a generic gradient on a short narrow bore column, using a system able to accommodate numerous solvents/buffers and columns. Instead of complete peak tracking, the number of peaks which can be separated was considered as a response at this level, to save time.ii)The optimization of secondary parameters (i.e. gradient conditions, mobile phase temperature and pH within a narrow range) requires only 12 initial experiments and the use of HPLC modeling software for data treatment. It allows to find out the best retention and selectivity for the selected compounds. Peak tracking was performed with a single quadruple mass detector in single ion recording mode, and UV detection (in a broad wavelength range).iii)The refinement step allows to further adjust column efficiency, by tuning column length and mobile phase flow rate. This can also be done virtually using HPLC modeling software.iv)The robustness testing step was also evaluated from a virtual experimental design. Success rate and regression coefficients were estimated in about 1 min, without the need to perform any real experiment. At the end, this method development workflow was performed in less than 4 days and minimizes the costs of the method development in liquid chromatography.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.jpba.2018.03.059
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2023407944</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0731708518304540</els_id><sourcerecordid>2023407944</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c356t-7a7e30684e85e93f2ed54c0b880463eed611a2124401a03a114dcfe82147ca9d3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kU1v1DAQhi1ERbeFP8AB-cglwV_5QlyqFS2VKvUCEjdr1p40XpI4tb1b9sfwX5sohSOnkWbe95FGDyHvOcs54-Wnfb6fdpALxuucyZwVzSuy4XUlM1Gqn6_JhlWSZxWri3NyEeOeMVbwRr0h56IpRVWJekP-3A5TjwOOCZLzI_UtBfqAIwZnaO8eD85S0wU_QPIPAaZuXg-YOm-pxSP2flq69MmHX23vnz7Tq2nqnVlhydPUIYUR-lN0cYFP3Sl5A-MIOzd6Z-N8tXS7LiKNc_EIFH-nACbFt-SshT7iu5d5SX5cf_2-_Zbd3d_cbq_uMiOLMmUVVChZWSusC2xkK9AWyrBdXTNVSkRbcg6CC6UYByaBc2VNi7XgqjLQWHlJPq7cKfjHA8akBxcN9j2M6A9RCyakYlWj1BwVa9QEH2PAVk_BDRBOmjO9aNF7vWjRixbNpJ61zKUPL_zDbkD7r_LXwxz4sgZw_vLoMOhoHI4GrQtokrbe_Y__DL5Hop4</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2023407944</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Implementation of a generic liquid chromatographic method development workflow: Application to the analysis of phytocannabinoids and Cannabis sativa extracts</title><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Fekete, Szabolcs ; Sadat-Noorbakhsh, Vida ; Schelling, Cedric ; Molnár, Imre ; Guillarme, Davy ; Rudaz, Serge ; Veuthey, Jean-Luc</creator><creatorcontrib>Fekete, Szabolcs ; Sadat-Noorbakhsh, Vida ; Schelling, Cedric ; Molnár, Imre ; Guillarme, Davy ; Rudaz, Serge ; Veuthey, Jean-Luc</creatorcontrib><description>•A generic RPLC method development workflow was proposed.•Screening, optimization, virtual refinement and virtual robustness testing were done.•This workflow was applied to phytocannabinoids and Cannabis sativa extracts.•This whole procedure takes only around 4 days of work. A generic liquid chromatographic method development workflow was developed and successfully applied to the analysis of phytocannabinoids and Cannabis sativa extracts. Our method development procedure consists in four steps: i)The screening of primary parameters (i.e. stationary phase nature, organic modifier nature and approximate mobile phase pH) was carried out with a generic gradient on a short narrow bore column, using a system able to accommodate numerous solvents/buffers and columns. Instead of complete peak tracking, the number of peaks which can be separated was considered as a response at this level, to save time.ii)The optimization of secondary parameters (i.e. gradient conditions, mobile phase temperature and pH within a narrow range) requires only 12 initial experiments and the use of HPLC modeling software for data treatment. It allows to find out the best retention and selectivity for the selected compounds. Peak tracking was performed with a single quadruple mass detector in single ion recording mode, and UV detection (in a broad wavelength range).iii)The refinement step allows to further adjust column efficiency, by tuning column length and mobile phase flow rate. This can also be done virtually using HPLC modeling software.iv)The robustness testing step was also evaluated from a virtual experimental design. Success rate and regression coefficients were estimated in about 1 min, without the need to perform any real experiment. At the end, this method development workflow was performed in less than 4 days and minimizes the costs of the method development in liquid chromatography.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0731-7085</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-264X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.jpba.2018.03.059</identifier><identifier>PMID: 29627728</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Elsevier B.V</publisher><subject>Cannabinoids ; Cannabis ; DryLab ; Method development ; Robustness test ; UHPLC</subject><ispartof>Journal of pharmaceutical and biomedical analysis, 2018-06, Vol.155, p.116-124</ispartof><rights>2018 Elsevier B.V.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2018 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c356t-7a7e30684e85e93f2ed54c0b880463eed611a2124401a03a114dcfe82147ca9d3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c356t-7a7e30684e85e93f2ed54c0b880463eed611a2124401a03a114dcfe82147ca9d3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0731708518304540$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,27901,27902,65306</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29627728$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Fekete, Szabolcs</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sadat-Noorbakhsh, Vida</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schelling, Cedric</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Molnár, Imre</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Guillarme, Davy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rudaz, Serge</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Veuthey, Jean-Luc</creatorcontrib><title>Implementation of a generic liquid chromatographic method development workflow: Application to the analysis of phytocannabinoids and Cannabis sativa extracts</title><title>Journal of pharmaceutical and biomedical analysis</title><addtitle>J Pharm Biomed Anal</addtitle><description>•A generic RPLC method development workflow was proposed.•Screening, optimization, virtual refinement and virtual robustness testing were done.•This workflow was applied to phytocannabinoids and Cannabis sativa extracts.•This whole procedure takes only around 4 days of work. A generic liquid chromatographic method development workflow was developed and successfully applied to the analysis of phytocannabinoids and Cannabis sativa extracts. Our method development procedure consists in four steps: i)The screening of primary parameters (i.e. stationary phase nature, organic modifier nature and approximate mobile phase pH) was carried out with a generic gradient on a short narrow bore column, using a system able to accommodate numerous solvents/buffers and columns. Instead of complete peak tracking, the number of peaks which can be separated was considered as a response at this level, to save time.ii)The optimization of secondary parameters (i.e. gradient conditions, mobile phase temperature and pH within a narrow range) requires only 12 initial experiments and the use of HPLC modeling software for data treatment. It allows to find out the best retention and selectivity for the selected compounds. Peak tracking was performed with a single quadruple mass detector in single ion recording mode, and UV detection (in a broad wavelength range).iii)The refinement step allows to further adjust column efficiency, by tuning column length and mobile phase flow rate. This can also be done virtually using HPLC modeling software.iv)The robustness testing step was also evaluated from a virtual experimental design. Success rate and regression coefficients were estimated in about 1 min, without the need to perform any real experiment. At the end, this method development workflow was performed in less than 4 days and minimizes the costs of the method development in liquid chromatography.</description><subject>Cannabinoids</subject><subject>Cannabis</subject><subject>DryLab</subject><subject>Method development</subject><subject>Robustness test</subject><subject>UHPLC</subject><issn>0731-7085</issn><issn>1873-264X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kU1v1DAQhi1ERbeFP8AB-cglwV_5QlyqFS2VKvUCEjdr1p40XpI4tb1b9sfwX5sohSOnkWbe95FGDyHvOcs54-Wnfb6fdpALxuucyZwVzSuy4XUlM1Gqn6_JhlWSZxWri3NyEeOeMVbwRr0h56IpRVWJekP-3A5TjwOOCZLzI_UtBfqAIwZnaO8eD85S0wU_QPIPAaZuXg-YOm-pxSP2flq69MmHX23vnz7Tq2nqnVlhydPUIYUR-lN0cYFP3Sl5A-MIOzd6Z-N8tXS7LiKNc_EIFH-nACbFt-SshT7iu5d5SX5cf_2-_Zbd3d_cbq_uMiOLMmUVVChZWSusC2xkK9AWyrBdXTNVSkRbcg6CC6UYByaBc2VNi7XgqjLQWHlJPq7cKfjHA8akBxcN9j2M6A9RCyakYlWj1BwVa9QEH2PAVk_BDRBOmjO9aNF7vWjRixbNpJ61zKUPL_zDbkD7r_LXwxz4sgZw_vLoMOhoHI4GrQtokrbe_Y__DL5Hop4</recordid><startdate>20180605</startdate><enddate>20180605</enddate><creator>Fekete, Szabolcs</creator><creator>Sadat-Noorbakhsh, Vida</creator><creator>Schelling, Cedric</creator><creator>Molnár, Imre</creator><creator>Guillarme, Davy</creator><creator>Rudaz, Serge</creator><creator>Veuthey, Jean-Luc</creator><general>Elsevier B.V</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20180605</creationdate><title>Implementation of a generic liquid chromatographic method development workflow: Application to the analysis of phytocannabinoids and Cannabis sativa extracts</title><author>Fekete, Szabolcs ; Sadat-Noorbakhsh, Vida ; Schelling, Cedric ; Molnár, Imre ; Guillarme, Davy ; Rudaz, Serge ; Veuthey, Jean-Luc</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c356t-7a7e30684e85e93f2ed54c0b880463eed611a2124401a03a114dcfe82147ca9d3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Cannabinoids</topic><topic>Cannabis</topic><topic>DryLab</topic><topic>Method development</topic><topic>Robustness test</topic><topic>UHPLC</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Fekete, Szabolcs</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sadat-Noorbakhsh, Vida</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schelling, Cedric</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Molnár, Imre</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Guillarme, Davy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rudaz, Serge</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Veuthey, Jean-Luc</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of pharmaceutical and biomedical analysis</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Fekete, Szabolcs</au><au>Sadat-Noorbakhsh, Vida</au><au>Schelling, Cedric</au><au>Molnár, Imre</au><au>Guillarme, Davy</au><au>Rudaz, Serge</au><au>Veuthey, Jean-Luc</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Implementation of a generic liquid chromatographic method development workflow: Application to the analysis of phytocannabinoids and Cannabis sativa extracts</atitle><jtitle>Journal of pharmaceutical and biomedical analysis</jtitle><addtitle>J Pharm Biomed Anal</addtitle><date>2018-06-05</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>155</volume><spage>116</spage><epage>124</epage><pages>116-124</pages><issn>0731-7085</issn><eissn>1873-264X</eissn><abstract>•A generic RPLC method development workflow was proposed.•Screening, optimization, virtual refinement and virtual robustness testing were done.•This workflow was applied to phytocannabinoids and Cannabis sativa extracts.•This whole procedure takes only around 4 days of work. A generic liquid chromatographic method development workflow was developed and successfully applied to the analysis of phytocannabinoids and Cannabis sativa extracts. Our method development procedure consists in four steps: i)The screening of primary parameters (i.e. stationary phase nature, organic modifier nature and approximate mobile phase pH) was carried out with a generic gradient on a short narrow bore column, using a system able to accommodate numerous solvents/buffers and columns. Instead of complete peak tracking, the number of peaks which can be separated was considered as a response at this level, to save time.ii)The optimization of secondary parameters (i.e. gradient conditions, mobile phase temperature and pH within a narrow range) requires only 12 initial experiments and the use of HPLC modeling software for data treatment. It allows to find out the best retention and selectivity for the selected compounds. Peak tracking was performed with a single quadruple mass detector in single ion recording mode, and UV detection (in a broad wavelength range).iii)The refinement step allows to further adjust column efficiency, by tuning column length and mobile phase flow rate. This can also be done virtually using HPLC modeling software.iv)The robustness testing step was also evaluated from a virtual experimental design. Success rate and regression coefficients were estimated in about 1 min, without the need to perform any real experiment. At the end, this method development workflow was performed in less than 4 days and minimizes the costs of the method development in liquid chromatography.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Elsevier B.V</pub><pmid>29627728</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.jpba.2018.03.059</doi><tpages>9</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0731-7085
ispartof Journal of pharmaceutical and biomedical analysis, 2018-06, Vol.155, p.116-124
issn 0731-7085
1873-264X
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2023407944
source Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals
subjects Cannabinoids
Cannabis
DryLab
Method development
Robustness test
UHPLC
title Implementation of a generic liquid chromatographic method development workflow: Application to the analysis of phytocannabinoids and Cannabis sativa extracts
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-29T04%3A55%3A21IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Implementation%20of%20a%20generic%20liquid%20chromatographic%20method%20development%20workflow:%20Application%20to%20the%20analysis%20of%20phytocannabinoids%20and%20Cannabis%20sativa%20extracts&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20pharmaceutical%20and%20biomedical%20analysis&rft.au=Fekete,%20Szabolcs&rft.date=2018-06-05&rft.volume=155&rft.spage=116&rft.epage=124&rft.pages=116-124&rft.issn=0731-7085&rft.eissn=1873-264X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.jpba.2018.03.059&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2023407944%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2023407944&rft_id=info:pmid/29627728&rft_els_id=S0731708518304540&rfr_iscdi=true