In vitro evaluation of Saccharomyces cerevisiae cell wall fermentability using a dog model

Summary Six Saccharomyces cerevisiae cell wall samples were tested by the in vitro gas production technique using dog faeces as inoculum. In particular, the substrates resulted from three different production processes (alcoholic_A, bakers_BA and brewers_BR) and were characterized by two different c...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of animal physiology and animal nutrition 2018-04, Vol.102 (S1), p.24-30
Hauptverfasser: Musco, N., Calabrò, S., Roberti, F., Grazioli, R., Tudisco, R., Lombardi, P., Cutrignelli, M. I.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 30
container_issue S1
container_start_page 24
container_title Journal of animal physiology and animal nutrition
container_volume 102
creator Musco, N.
Calabrò, S.
Roberti, F.
Grazioli, R.
Tudisco, R.
Lombardi, P.
Cutrignelli, M. I.
description Summary Six Saccharomyces cerevisiae cell wall samples were tested by the in vitro gas production technique using dog faeces as inoculum. In particular, the substrates resulted from three different production processes (alcoholic_A, bakers_BA and brewers_BR) and were characterized by two different carbohydrates (mannans + glucans) concentrations nitrogen‐free extract (NFE high and low). Gas production of fermenting cultures was recorded for 72 hr to estimate the fermentation profiles. The organic matter degradability (OMD), fermentation liquor pH, short‐chain fatty acids (SCFA) and ammonia (NH3) productions were also measured. All substrates presented a high percentage of OMD (>92%) and moderate fermentability in terms of cumulative volume of gas related to incubated OM (OMCV >50 ml/g) and short‐chain fatty acids production (>25 mmol/g), proving their functional properties. Comparing the substrates, it seems evident that the production process affects the chemical composition of the yeast cell wall in terms of crude protein, ether extract and ash content. Consequently, the in vitro fermentation process was significantly different among substrates for volume of gas, SCFA and ammonia production. Regarding the fermentation rate profiles, the production process influenced mainly the curve shape, whereas the NFE concentration affected the quantity of gas produced per hour. In particular, both S. cerevisiae_BR showed very high percentage of OM degradability, gas and SCFA productions and a fast fermentation process due to their high content of fermentable carbohydrates. On the contrary, both S. cerevisiae_BA yeast cell walls appeared to be less degradable and fermentable, probably due to their high content of ether extract. Regarding both S. cerevisiae_A, the high protein content of these substrates could explain the contrasting in vitro results (high degradability with low gas and SCFA production).
doi_str_mv 10.1111/jpn.12864
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2022994668</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2022994668</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4544-87bb373f60139d343e1f26798cbabb36a56dd51779a713b8e4d09d4d503c5ef33</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp10E9PwyAYBnBiNG5OD34BQ-JFD51QKC1Hs_hnZlET9eKloeXtZGnLhHZm317m1IOJHIDAL0_ePAgdUzKmYV0slu2YxpngO2hIOZMRYVLsoiGRjEZxeBigA-8XhNA0IWIfDWIpYiYyOUSv0xavTOcshpWqe9UZ22Jb4SdVlm_K2WZdgsclOFgZbxSEa13jDxW2ClwDbacKU5tujXtv2jlWWNs5bqyG-hDtVar2cPR9jtDL9dXz5DaaPdxMJ5ezqOQJ51GWFgVLWSUIZVIzzoBWsUhlVhYq_AiVCK0TmqZSpZQVGXBNpOY6IaxMoGJshM62uUtn33vwXd4YvxlTtWB7n8ckjqXkQmSBnv6hC9u7Nkz3pUiSiEwEdb5VpbPeO6jypTONcuucknxTeB4Kz78KD_bkO7EvGtC_8qfhAC624MPUsP4_Kb97vN9GfgIYCImb</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2022055686</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>In vitro evaluation of Saccharomyces cerevisiae cell wall fermentability using a dog model</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Online Library All Journals</source><creator>Musco, N. ; Calabrò, S. ; Roberti, F. ; Grazioli, R. ; Tudisco, R. ; Lombardi, P. ; Cutrignelli, M. I.</creator><creatorcontrib>Musco, N. ; Calabrò, S. ; Roberti, F. ; Grazioli, R. ; Tudisco, R. ; Lombardi, P. ; Cutrignelli, M. I.</creatorcontrib><description>Summary Six Saccharomyces cerevisiae cell wall samples were tested by the in vitro gas production technique using dog faeces as inoculum. In particular, the substrates resulted from three different production processes (alcoholic_A, bakers_BA and brewers_BR) and were characterized by two different carbohydrates (mannans + glucans) concentrations nitrogen‐free extract (NFE high and low). Gas production of fermenting cultures was recorded for 72 hr to estimate the fermentation profiles. The organic matter degradability (OMD), fermentation liquor pH, short‐chain fatty acids (SCFA) and ammonia (NH3) productions were also measured. All substrates presented a high percentage of OMD (&gt;92%) and moderate fermentability in terms of cumulative volume of gas related to incubated OM (OMCV &gt;50 ml/g) and short‐chain fatty acids production (&gt;25 mmol/g), proving their functional properties. Comparing the substrates, it seems evident that the production process affects the chemical composition of the yeast cell wall in terms of crude protein, ether extract and ash content. Consequently, the in vitro fermentation process was significantly different among substrates for volume of gas, SCFA and ammonia production. Regarding the fermentation rate profiles, the production process influenced mainly the curve shape, whereas the NFE concentration affected the quantity of gas produced per hour. In particular, both S. cerevisiae_BR showed very high percentage of OM degradability, gas and SCFA productions and a fast fermentation process due to their high content of fermentable carbohydrates. On the contrary, both S. cerevisiae_BA yeast cell walls appeared to be less degradable and fermentable, probably due to their high content of ether extract. Regarding both S. cerevisiae_A, the high protein content of these substrates could explain the contrasting in vitro results (high degradability with low gas and SCFA production).</description><identifier>ISSN: 0931-2439</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1439-0396</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/jpn.12864</identifier><identifier>PMID: 29623689</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Germany: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</publisher><subject>Ammonia ; Animals ; Baking yeast ; Carbohydrates ; Cell Wall - physiology ; Cell walls ; Chains ; Degradability ; Degradation ; Dogs - physiology ; Fatty acids ; Feces - microbiology ; Fermentation ; Gas production ; Gastrointestinal Tract - physiology ; Glucans ; Inoculum ; Organic matter ; pre‐biotic ; Saccharomyces cerevisiae ; Saccharomyces cerevisiae - classification ; Saccharomyces cerevisiae - physiology ; short‐chain fatty acids ; Substrates ; Yeast</subject><ispartof>Journal of animal physiology and animal nutrition, 2018-04, Vol.102 (S1), p.24-30</ispartof><rights>2018 Blackwell Verlag GmbH</rights><rights>2018 Blackwell Verlag GmbH.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4544-87bb373f60139d343e1f26798cbabb36a56dd51779a713b8e4d09d4d503c5ef33</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4544-87bb373f60139d343e1f26798cbabb36a56dd51779a713b8e4d09d4d503c5ef33</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-0758-1472</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fjpn.12864$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fjpn.12864$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1417,27924,27925,45574,45575</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29623689$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Musco, N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Calabrò, S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Roberti, F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Grazioli, R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tudisco, R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lombardi, P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cutrignelli, M. I.</creatorcontrib><title>In vitro evaluation of Saccharomyces cerevisiae cell wall fermentability using a dog model</title><title>Journal of animal physiology and animal nutrition</title><addtitle>J Anim Physiol Anim Nutr (Berl)</addtitle><description>Summary Six Saccharomyces cerevisiae cell wall samples were tested by the in vitro gas production technique using dog faeces as inoculum. In particular, the substrates resulted from three different production processes (alcoholic_A, bakers_BA and brewers_BR) and were characterized by two different carbohydrates (mannans + glucans) concentrations nitrogen‐free extract (NFE high and low). Gas production of fermenting cultures was recorded for 72 hr to estimate the fermentation profiles. The organic matter degradability (OMD), fermentation liquor pH, short‐chain fatty acids (SCFA) and ammonia (NH3) productions were also measured. All substrates presented a high percentage of OMD (&gt;92%) and moderate fermentability in terms of cumulative volume of gas related to incubated OM (OMCV &gt;50 ml/g) and short‐chain fatty acids production (&gt;25 mmol/g), proving their functional properties. Comparing the substrates, it seems evident that the production process affects the chemical composition of the yeast cell wall in terms of crude protein, ether extract and ash content. Consequently, the in vitro fermentation process was significantly different among substrates for volume of gas, SCFA and ammonia production. Regarding the fermentation rate profiles, the production process influenced mainly the curve shape, whereas the NFE concentration affected the quantity of gas produced per hour. In particular, both S. cerevisiae_BR showed very high percentage of OM degradability, gas and SCFA productions and a fast fermentation process due to their high content of fermentable carbohydrates. On the contrary, both S. cerevisiae_BA yeast cell walls appeared to be less degradable and fermentable, probably due to their high content of ether extract. Regarding both S. cerevisiae_A, the high protein content of these substrates could explain the contrasting in vitro results (high degradability with low gas and SCFA production).</description><subject>Ammonia</subject><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Baking yeast</subject><subject>Carbohydrates</subject><subject>Cell Wall - physiology</subject><subject>Cell walls</subject><subject>Chains</subject><subject>Degradability</subject><subject>Degradation</subject><subject>Dogs - physiology</subject><subject>Fatty acids</subject><subject>Feces - microbiology</subject><subject>Fermentation</subject><subject>Gas production</subject><subject>Gastrointestinal Tract - physiology</subject><subject>Glucans</subject><subject>Inoculum</subject><subject>Organic matter</subject><subject>pre‐biotic</subject><subject>Saccharomyces cerevisiae</subject><subject>Saccharomyces cerevisiae - classification</subject><subject>Saccharomyces cerevisiae - physiology</subject><subject>short‐chain fatty acids</subject><subject>Substrates</subject><subject>Yeast</subject><issn>0931-2439</issn><issn>1439-0396</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp10E9PwyAYBnBiNG5OD34BQ-JFD51QKC1Hs_hnZlET9eKloeXtZGnLhHZm317m1IOJHIDAL0_ePAgdUzKmYV0slu2YxpngO2hIOZMRYVLsoiGRjEZxeBigA-8XhNA0IWIfDWIpYiYyOUSv0xavTOcshpWqe9UZ22Jb4SdVlm_K2WZdgsclOFgZbxSEa13jDxW2ClwDbacKU5tujXtv2jlWWNs5bqyG-hDtVar2cPR9jtDL9dXz5DaaPdxMJ5ezqOQJ51GWFgVLWSUIZVIzzoBWsUhlVhYq_AiVCK0TmqZSpZQVGXBNpOY6IaxMoGJshM62uUtn33vwXd4YvxlTtWB7n8ckjqXkQmSBnv6hC9u7Nkz3pUiSiEwEdb5VpbPeO6jypTONcuucknxTeB4Kz78KD_bkO7EvGtC_8qfhAC624MPUsP4_Kb97vN9GfgIYCImb</recordid><startdate>201804</startdate><enddate>201804</enddate><creator>Musco, N.</creator><creator>Calabrò, S.</creator><creator>Roberti, F.</creator><creator>Grazioli, R.</creator><creator>Tudisco, R.</creator><creator>Lombardi, P.</creator><creator>Cutrignelli, M. I.</creator><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0758-1472</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>201804</creationdate><title>In vitro evaluation of Saccharomyces cerevisiae cell wall fermentability using a dog model</title><author>Musco, N. ; Calabrò, S. ; Roberti, F. ; Grazioli, R. ; Tudisco, R. ; Lombardi, P. ; Cutrignelli, M. I.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4544-87bb373f60139d343e1f26798cbabb36a56dd51779a713b8e4d09d4d503c5ef33</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Ammonia</topic><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Baking yeast</topic><topic>Carbohydrates</topic><topic>Cell Wall - physiology</topic><topic>Cell walls</topic><topic>Chains</topic><topic>Degradability</topic><topic>Degradation</topic><topic>Dogs - physiology</topic><topic>Fatty acids</topic><topic>Feces - microbiology</topic><topic>Fermentation</topic><topic>Gas production</topic><topic>Gastrointestinal Tract - physiology</topic><topic>Glucans</topic><topic>Inoculum</topic><topic>Organic matter</topic><topic>pre‐biotic</topic><topic>Saccharomyces cerevisiae</topic><topic>Saccharomyces cerevisiae - classification</topic><topic>Saccharomyces cerevisiae - physiology</topic><topic>short‐chain fatty acids</topic><topic>Substrates</topic><topic>Yeast</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Musco, N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Calabrò, S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Roberti, F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Grazioli, R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tudisco, R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lombardi, P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cutrignelli, M. I.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of animal physiology and animal nutrition</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Musco, N.</au><au>Calabrò, S.</au><au>Roberti, F.</au><au>Grazioli, R.</au><au>Tudisco, R.</au><au>Lombardi, P.</au><au>Cutrignelli, M. I.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>In vitro evaluation of Saccharomyces cerevisiae cell wall fermentability using a dog model</atitle><jtitle>Journal of animal physiology and animal nutrition</jtitle><addtitle>J Anim Physiol Anim Nutr (Berl)</addtitle><date>2018-04</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>102</volume><issue>S1</issue><spage>24</spage><epage>30</epage><pages>24-30</pages><issn>0931-2439</issn><eissn>1439-0396</eissn><abstract>Summary Six Saccharomyces cerevisiae cell wall samples were tested by the in vitro gas production technique using dog faeces as inoculum. In particular, the substrates resulted from three different production processes (alcoholic_A, bakers_BA and brewers_BR) and were characterized by two different carbohydrates (mannans + glucans) concentrations nitrogen‐free extract (NFE high and low). Gas production of fermenting cultures was recorded for 72 hr to estimate the fermentation profiles. The organic matter degradability (OMD), fermentation liquor pH, short‐chain fatty acids (SCFA) and ammonia (NH3) productions were also measured. All substrates presented a high percentage of OMD (&gt;92%) and moderate fermentability in terms of cumulative volume of gas related to incubated OM (OMCV &gt;50 ml/g) and short‐chain fatty acids production (&gt;25 mmol/g), proving their functional properties. Comparing the substrates, it seems evident that the production process affects the chemical composition of the yeast cell wall in terms of crude protein, ether extract and ash content. Consequently, the in vitro fermentation process was significantly different among substrates for volume of gas, SCFA and ammonia production. Regarding the fermentation rate profiles, the production process influenced mainly the curve shape, whereas the NFE concentration affected the quantity of gas produced per hour. In particular, both S. cerevisiae_BR showed very high percentage of OM degradability, gas and SCFA productions and a fast fermentation process due to their high content of fermentable carbohydrates. On the contrary, both S. cerevisiae_BA yeast cell walls appeared to be less degradable and fermentable, probably due to their high content of ether extract. Regarding both S. cerevisiae_A, the high protein content of these substrates could explain the contrasting in vitro results (high degradability with low gas and SCFA production).</abstract><cop>Germany</cop><pub>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</pub><pmid>29623689</pmid><doi>10.1111/jpn.12864</doi><tpages>7</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0758-1472</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0931-2439
ispartof Journal of animal physiology and animal nutrition, 2018-04, Vol.102 (S1), p.24-30
issn 0931-2439
1439-0396
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2022994668
source MEDLINE; Wiley Online Library All Journals
subjects Ammonia
Animals
Baking yeast
Carbohydrates
Cell Wall - physiology
Cell walls
Chains
Degradability
Degradation
Dogs - physiology
Fatty acids
Feces - microbiology
Fermentation
Gas production
Gastrointestinal Tract - physiology
Glucans
Inoculum
Organic matter
pre‐biotic
Saccharomyces cerevisiae
Saccharomyces cerevisiae - classification
Saccharomyces cerevisiae - physiology
short‐chain fatty acids
Substrates
Yeast
title In vitro evaluation of Saccharomyces cerevisiae cell wall fermentability using a dog model
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-08T06%3A12%3A31IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=In%20vitro%20evaluation%20of%20Saccharomyces%20cerevisiae%20cell%20wall%20fermentability%20using%20a%20dog%20model&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20animal%20physiology%20and%20animal%20nutrition&rft.au=Musco,%20N.&rft.date=2018-04&rft.volume=102&rft.issue=S1&rft.spage=24&rft.epage=30&rft.pages=24-30&rft.issn=0931-2439&rft.eissn=1439-0396&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/jpn.12864&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2022994668%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2022055686&rft_id=info:pmid/29623689&rfr_iscdi=true