Axillary Accessory Breast: Optimal Time for Operation

Background Accessory breasts are usually located in the axilla. Symptoms associated with an axillary accessory breast (AAB) may newly develop or worsen after pregnancy. After childbirth, AAB engorgement and hyperplasia may occur due to milk formation. We evaluated the optimal time for AAB excision a...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Aesthetic plastic surgery 2018-10, Vol.42 (5), p.1231-1243
Hauptverfasser: Lee, Sung Ryul, Lee, Seung Geun, Byun, Geon Young, Kim, Myoung Jin, Koo, Bum Hwan
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1243
container_issue 5
container_start_page 1231
container_title Aesthetic plastic surgery
container_volume 42
creator Lee, Sung Ryul
Lee, Seung Geun
Byun, Geon Young
Kim, Myoung Jin
Koo, Bum Hwan
description Background Accessory breasts are usually located in the axilla. Symptoms associated with an axillary accessory breast (AAB) may newly develop or worsen after pregnancy. After childbirth, AAB engorgement and hyperplasia may occur due to milk formation. We evaluated the optimal time for AAB excision and assessed variations in clinical presentations and surgical outcomes associated with pregnancy. Methods In total, 540 women whose symptoms began from puberty and underwent AAB excision were retrospectively analyzed. Group 1 comprised 416 patients who underwent operations before pregnancy, and Group 2 comprised 124 patients who underwent operations after childbirth. AABs were classified according to the Damsoyu–Lee (DL) classification. Satisfaction was measured by pain and cosmesis 3 months postoperatively. Results Group 2 had more patients with severe symptoms [DL class II ( n  = 8, 6.5%) and III ( n  = 15, 12.1%)] than Group 1 ( p  = 0.049). The specimen weight and liposuction volume were greater in Group 2. The reoperation rate was also higher in Group 2 [loosening skin excision ( n  = 4, 3.2%) and remnant gland excision ( n  = 3, 2.4%)] ( p  = 0.032). In Group 2, 31 (25%) patients had AAB engorgement after childbirth and 7 (5.6%) had milk secretion from the accessory nipple after childbirth. The overall satisfaction score was lower in Group 2 than 1. Conclusions Pregnancy may cause accessory breast gland hyperplasia. After childbirth, symptoms such as AAB engorgement and milk secretion from the accessory nipple may occur. The optimal timing for operation for AAB appears to be before the onset of pregnancy because of lower reoperation rates and greater patient satisfaction. Level of Evidence IV This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s00266-018-1128-8
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2022981284</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2022456611</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c372t-ef4fe0c00777cc6082f47f5963d88a7089671994c1596fbbe61e1d864e72f0343</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kE1LAzEQhoMotlZ_gBdZ8OIlmpnNJllvtfgFhV4qeAvbNJEt-1GTLdh_b-pWBcHTDJNn3rzzEnIO7BoYkzeBMRSCMlAUABVVB2QIPEWaIYdDMmSp4BRBvA7ISQgrxgCl5MdkgLlAgSCHJBt_lFVV-G0yNsaG0MbuztsidLfJbN2VdVEl87K2iWt9HFhfdGXbnJIjV1TBnu3riLw83M8nT3Q6e3yejKfUpBI7ah13lploVUpjBFPouHRZLtKlUoVkKhcS8pwbiDO3WFgBFpZKcCvRsZSnI3LV6659-76xodN1GYyNhhvbboJGhpirePoOvfyDrtqNb6K7L4pnQgBECnrK-DYEb51e-3ij32pgepep7jPVMVO9y1SruHOxV94sarv82fgOMQLYAyE-NW_W_379v-on2QV-lA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2022456611</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Axillary Accessory Breast: Optimal Time for Operation</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings</source><creator>Lee, Sung Ryul ; Lee, Seung Geun ; Byun, Geon Young ; Kim, Myoung Jin ; Koo, Bum Hwan</creator><creatorcontrib>Lee, Sung Ryul ; Lee, Seung Geun ; Byun, Geon Young ; Kim, Myoung Jin ; Koo, Bum Hwan</creatorcontrib><description>Background Accessory breasts are usually located in the axilla. Symptoms associated with an axillary accessory breast (AAB) may newly develop or worsen after pregnancy. After childbirth, AAB engorgement and hyperplasia may occur due to milk formation. We evaluated the optimal time for AAB excision and assessed variations in clinical presentations and surgical outcomes associated with pregnancy. Methods In total, 540 women whose symptoms began from puberty and underwent AAB excision were retrospectively analyzed. Group 1 comprised 416 patients who underwent operations before pregnancy, and Group 2 comprised 124 patients who underwent operations after childbirth. AABs were classified according to the Damsoyu–Lee (DL) classification. Satisfaction was measured by pain and cosmesis 3 months postoperatively. Results Group 2 had more patients with severe symptoms [DL class II ( n  = 8, 6.5%) and III ( n  = 15, 12.1%)] than Group 1 ( p  = 0.049). The specimen weight and liposuction volume were greater in Group 2. The reoperation rate was also higher in Group 2 [loosening skin excision ( n  = 4, 3.2%) and remnant gland excision ( n  = 3, 2.4%)] ( p  = 0.032). In Group 2, 31 (25%) patients had AAB engorgement after childbirth and 7 (5.6%) had milk secretion from the accessory nipple after childbirth. The overall satisfaction score was lower in Group 2 than 1. Conclusions Pregnancy may cause accessory breast gland hyperplasia. After childbirth, symptoms such as AAB engorgement and milk secretion from the accessory nipple may occur. The optimal timing for operation for AAB appears to be before the onset of pregnancy because of lower reoperation rates and greater patient satisfaction. Level of Evidence IV This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .</description><identifier>ISSN: 0364-216X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1432-5241</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s00266-018-1128-8</identifier><identifier>PMID: 29626217</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York: Springer US</publisher><subject>Adolescent ; Adult ; Age Factors ; Axilla - surgery ; Breast ; Breast Diseases - diagnosis ; Breast Diseases - surgery ; Breasts ; Childbirth &amp; labor ; Choristoma - surgery ; Cohort Studies ; Esthetics ; Female ; Humans ; Hyperplasia ; Logistic Models ; Mammaplasty - methods ; Medicine ; Medicine &amp; Public Health ; Middle Aged ; Multivariate Analysis ; Nipples - abnormalities ; Nipples - surgery ; Original Article ; Otorhinolaryngology ; Patient satisfaction ; Patient Satisfaction - statistics &amp; numerical data ; Plastic Surgery ; Pregnancy ; Retrospective Studies ; Risk Assessment ; Severity of Illness Index ; Time Factors ; Treatment Outcome ; Young Adult</subject><ispartof>Aesthetic plastic surgery, 2018-10, Vol.42 (5), p.1231-1243</ispartof><rights>Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature and International Society of Aesthetic Plastic Surgery 2018</rights><rights>Aesthetic Plastic Surgery is a copyright of Springer, (2018). All Rights Reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c372t-ef4fe0c00777cc6082f47f5963d88a7089671994c1596fbbe61e1d864e72f0343</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c372t-ef4fe0c00777cc6082f47f5963d88a7089671994c1596fbbe61e1d864e72f0343</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-0201-0627</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s00266-018-1128-8$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s00266-018-1128-8$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,27905,27906,41469,42538,51300</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29626217$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Lee, Sung Ryul</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lee, Seung Geun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Byun, Geon Young</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kim, Myoung Jin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Koo, Bum Hwan</creatorcontrib><title>Axillary Accessory Breast: Optimal Time for Operation</title><title>Aesthetic plastic surgery</title><addtitle>Aesth Plast Surg</addtitle><addtitle>Aesthetic Plast Surg</addtitle><description>Background Accessory breasts are usually located in the axilla. Symptoms associated with an axillary accessory breast (AAB) may newly develop or worsen after pregnancy. After childbirth, AAB engorgement and hyperplasia may occur due to milk formation. We evaluated the optimal time for AAB excision and assessed variations in clinical presentations and surgical outcomes associated with pregnancy. Methods In total, 540 women whose symptoms began from puberty and underwent AAB excision were retrospectively analyzed. Group 1 comprised 416 patients who underwent operations before pregnancy, and Group 2 comprised 124 patients who underwent operations after childbirth. AABs were classified according to the Damsoyu–Lee (DL) classification. Satisfaction was measured by pain and cosmesis 3 months postoperatively. Results Group 2 had more patients with severe symptoms [DL class II ( n  = 8, 6.5%) and III ( n  = 15, 12.1%)] than Group 1 ( p  = 0.049). The specimen weight and liposuction volume were greater in Group 2. The reoperation rate was also higher in Group 2 [loosening skin excision ( n  = 4, 3.2%) and remnant gland excision ( n  = 3, 2.4%)] ( p  = 0.032). In Group 2, 31 (25%) patients had AAB engorgement after childbirth and 7 (5.6%) had milk secretion from the accessory nipple after childbirth. The overall satisfaction score was lower in Group 2 than 1. Conclusions Pregnancy may cause accessory breast gland hyperplasia. After childbirth, symptoms such as AAB engorgement and milk secretion from the accessory nipple may occur. The optimal timing for operation for AAB appears to be before the onset of pregnancy because of lower reoperation rates and greater patient satisfaction. Level of Evidence IV This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .</description><subject>Adolescent</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Age Factors</subject><subject>Axilla - surgery</subject><subject>Breast</subject><subject>Breast Diseases - diagnosis</subject><subject>Breast Diseases - surgery</subject><subject>Breasts</subject><subject>Childbirth &amp; labor</subject><subject>Choristoma - surgery</subject><subject>Cohort Studies</subject><subject>Esthetics</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Hyperplasia</subject><subject>Logistic Models</subject><subject>Mammaplasty - methods</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Medicine &amp; Public Health</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Multivariate Analysis</subject><subject>Nipples - abnormalities</subject><subject>Nipples - surgery</subject><subject>Original Article</subject><subject>Otorhinolaryngology</subject><subject>Patient satisfaction</subject><subject>Patient Satisfaction - statistics &amp; numerical data</subject><subject>Plastic Surgery</subject><subject>Pregnancy</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><subject>Risk Assessment</subject><subject>Severity of Illness Index</subject><subject>Time Factors</subject><subject>Treatment Outcome</subject><subject>Young Adult</subject><issn>0364-216X</issn><issn>1432-5241</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kE1LAzEQhoMotlZ_gBdZ8OIlmpnNJllvtfgFhV4qeAvbNJEt-1GTLdh_b-pWBcHTDJNn3rzzEnIO7BoYkzeBMRSCMlAUABVVB2QIPEWaIYdDMmSp4BRBvA7ISQgrxgCl5MdkgLlAgSCHJBt_lFVV-G0yNsaG0MbuztsidLfJbN2VdVEl87K2iWt9HFhfdGXbnJIjV1TBnu3riLw83M8nT3Q6e3yejKfUpBI7ah13lploVUpjBFPouHRZLtKlUoVkKhcS8pwbiDO3WFgBFpZKcCvRsZSnI3LV6659-76xodN1GYyNhhvbboJGhpirePoOvfyDrtqNb6K7L4pnQgBECnrK-DYEb51e-3ij32pgepep7jPVMVO9y1SruHOxV94sarv82fgOMQLYAyE-NW_W_379v-on2QV-lA</recordid><startdate>20181001</startdate><enddate>20181001</enddate><creator>Lee, Sung Ryul</creator><creator>Lee, Seung Geun</creator><creator>Byun, Geon Young</creator><creator>Kim, Myoung Jin</creator><creator>Koo, Bum Hwan</creator><general>Springer US</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0201-0627</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20181001</creationdate><title>Axillary Accessory Breast: Optimal Time for Operation</title><author>Lee, Sung Ryul ; Lee, Seung Geun ; Byun, Geon Young ; Kim, Myoung Jin ; Koo, Bum Hwan</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c372t-ef4fe0c00777cc6082f47f5963d88a7089671994c1596fbbe61e1d864e72f0343</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Adolescent</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Age Factors</topic><topic>Axilla - surgery</topic><topic>Breast</topic><topic>Breast Diseases - diagnosis</topic><topic>Breast Diseases - surgery</topic><topic>Breasts</topic><topic>Childbirth &amp; labor</topic><topic>Choristoma - surgery</topic><topic>Cohort Studies</topic><topic>Esthetics</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Hyperplasia</topic><topic>Logistic Models</topic><topic>Mammaplasty - methods</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Medicine &amp; Public Health</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Multivariate Analysis</topic><topic>Nipples - abnormalities</topic><topic>Nipples - surgery</topic><topic>Original Article</topic><topic>Otorhinolaryngology</topic><topic>Patient satisfaction</topic><topic>Patient Satisfaction - statistics &amp; numerical data</topic><topic>Plastic Surgery</topic><topic>Pregnancy</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><topic>Risk Assessment</topic><topic>Severity of Illness Index</topic><topic>Time Factors</topic><topic>Treatment Outcome</topic><topic>Young Adult</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Lee, Sung Ryul</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lee, Seung Geun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Byun, Geon Young</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kim, Myoung Jin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Koo, Bum Hwan</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health Medical collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Aesthetic plastic surgery</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Lee, Sung Ryul</au><au>Lee, Seung Geun</au><au>Byun, Geon Young</au><au>Kim, Myoung Jin</au><au>Koo, Bum Hwan</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Axillary Accessory Breast: Optimal Time for Operation</atitle><jtitle>Aesthetic plastic surgery</jtitle><stitle>Aesth Plast Surg</stitle><addtitle>Aesthetic Plast Surg</addtitle><date>2018-10-01</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>42</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>1231</spage><epage>1243</epage><pages>1231-1243</pages><issn>0364-216X</issn><eissn>1432-5241</eissn><abstract>Background Accessory breasts are usually located in the axilla. Symptoms associated with an axillary accessory breast (AAB) may newly develop or worsen after pregnancy. After childbirth, AAB engorgement and hyperplasia may occur due to milk formation. We evaluated the optimal time for AAB excision and assessed variations in clinical presentations and surgical outcomes associated with pregnancy. Methods In total, 540 women whose symptoms began from puberty and underwent AAB excision were retrospectively analyzed. Group 1 comprised 416 patients who underwent operations before pregnancy, and Group 2 comprised 124 patients who underwent operations after childbirth. AABs were classified according to the Damsoyu–Lee (DL) classification. Satisfaction was measured by pain and cosmesis 3 months postoperatively. Results Group 2 had more patients with severe symptoms [DL class II ( n  = 8, 6.5%) and III ( n  = 15, 12.1%)] than Group 1 ( p  = 0.049). The specimen weight and liposuction volume were greater in Group 2. The reoperation rate was also higher in Group 2 [loosening skin excision ( n  = 4, 3.2%) and remnant gland excision ( n  = 3, 2.4%)] ( p  = 0.032). In Group 2, 31 (25%) patients had AAB engorgement after childbirth and 7 (5.6%) had milk secretion from the accessory nipple after childbirth. The overall satisfaction score was lower in Group 2 than 1. Conclusions Pregnancy may cause accessory breast gland hyperplasia. After childbirth, symptoms such as AAB engorgement and milk secretion from the accessory nipple may occur. The optimal timing for operation for AAB appears to be before the onset of pregnancy because of lower reoperation rates and greater patient satisfaction. Level of Evidence IV This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .</abstract><cop>New York</cop><pub>Springer US</pub><pmid>29626217</pmid><doi>10.1007/s00266-018-1128-8</doi><tpages>13</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0201-0627</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0364-216X
ispartof Aesthetic plastic surgery, 2018-10, Vol.42 (5), p.1231-1243
issn 0364-216X
1432-5241
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2022981284
source MEDLINE; SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings
subjects Adolescent
Adult
Age Factors
Axilla - surgery
Breast
Breast Diseases - diagnosis
Breast Diseases - surgery
Breasts
Childbirth & labor
Choristoma - surgery
Cohort Studies
Esthetics
Female
Humans
Hyperplasia
Logistic Models
Mammaplasty - methods
Medicine
Medicine & Public Health
Middle Aged
Multivariate Analysis
Nipples - abnormalities
Nipples - surgery
Original Article
Otorhinolaryngology
Patient satisfaction
Patient Satisfaction - statistics & numerical data
Plastic Surgery
Pregnancy
Retrospective Studies
Risk Assessment
Severity of Illness Index
Time Factors
Treatment Outcome
Young Adult
title Axillary Accessory Breast: Optimal Time for Operation
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-17T18%3A13%3A15IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Axillary%20Accessory%20Breast:%20Optimal%20Time%20for%20Operation&rft.jtitle=Aesthetic%20plastic%20surgery&rft.au=Lee,%20Sung%20Ryul&rft.date=2018-10-01&rft.volume=42&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=1231&rft.epage=1243&rft.pages=1231-1243&rft.issn=0364-216X&rft.eissn=1432-5241&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s00266-018-1128-8&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2022456611%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2022456611&rft_id=info:pmid/29626217&rfr_iscdi=true