Axillary Accessory Breast: Optimal Time for Operation
Background Accessory breasts are usually located in the axilla. Symptoms associated with an axillary accessory breast (AAB) may newly develop or worsen after pregnancy. After childbirth, AAB engorgement and hyperplasia may occur due to milk formation. We evaluated the optimal time for AAB excision a...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Aesthetic plastic surgery 2018-10, Vol.42 (5), p.1231-1243 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 1243 |
---|---|
container_issue | 5 |
container_start_page | 1231 |
container_title | Aesthetic plastic surgery |
container_volume | 42 |
creator | Lee, Sung Ryul Lee, Seung Geun Byun, Geon Young Kim, Myoung Jin Koo, Bum Hwan |
description | Background
Accessory breasts are usually located in the axilla. Symptoms associated with an axillary accessory breast (AAB) may newly develop or worsen after pregnancy. After childbirth, AAB engorgement and hyperplasia may occur due to milk formation. We evaluated the optimal time for AAB excision and assessed variations in clinical presentations and surgical outcomes associated with pregnancy.
Methods
In total, 540 women whose symptoms began from puberty and underwent AAB excision were retrospectively analyzed. Group 1 comprised 416 patients who underwent operations before pregnancy, and Group 2 comprised 124 patients who underwent operations after childbirth. AABs were classified according to the Damsoyu–Lee (DL) classification. Satisfaction was measured by pain and cosmesis 3 months postoperatively.
Results
Group 2 had more patients with severe symptoms [DL class II (
n
= 8, 6.5%) and III (
n
= 15, 12.1%)] than Group 1 (
p
= 0.049). The specimen weight and liposuction volume were greater in Group 2. The reoperation rate was also higher in Group 2 [loosening skin excision (
n
= 4, 3.2%) and remnant gland excision (
n
= 3, 2.4%)] (
p
= 0.032). In Group 2, 31 (25%) patients had AAB engorgement after childbirth and 7 (5.6%) had milk secretion from the accessory nipple after childbirth. The overall satisfaction score was lower in Group 2 than 1.
Conclusions
Pregnancy may cause accessory breast gland hyperplasia. After childbirth, symptoms such as AAB engorgement and milk secretion from the accessory nipple may occur. The optimal timing for operation for AAB appears to be before the onset of pregnancy because of lower reoperation rates and greater patient satisfaction.
Level of Evidence IV
This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors
www.springer.com/00266
. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s00266-018-1128-8 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2022981284</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2022456611</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c372t-ef4fe0c00777cc6082f47f5963d88a7089671994c1596fbbe61e1d864e72f0343</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kE1LAzEQhoMotlZ_gBdZ8OIlmpnNJllvtfgFhV4qeAvbNJEt-1GTLdh_b-pWBcHTDJNn3rzzEnIO7BoYkzeBMRSCMlAUABVVB2QIPEWaIYdDMmSp4BRBvA7ISQgrxgCl5MdkgLlAgSCHJBt_lFVV-G0yNsaG0MbuztsidLfJbN2VdVEl87K2iWt9HFhfdGXbnJIjV1TBnu3riLw83M8nT3Q6e3yejKfUpBI7ah13lploVUpjBFPouHRZLtKlUoVkKhcS8pwbiDO3WFgBFpZKcCvRsZSnI3LV6659-76xodN1GYyNhhvbboJGhpirePoOvfyDrtqNb6K7L4pnQgBECnrK-DYEb51e-3ij32pgepep7jPVMVO9y1SruHOxV94sarv82fgOMQLYAyE-NW_W_379v-on2QV-lA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2022456611</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Axillary Accessory Breast: Optimal Time for Operation</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings</source><creator>Lee, Sung Ryul ; Lee, Seung Geun ; Byun, Geon Young ; Kim, Myoung Jin ; Koo, Bum Hwan</creator><creatorcontrib>Lee, Sung Ryul ; Lee, Seung Geun ; Byun, Geon Young ; Kim, Myoung Jin ; Koo, Bum Hwan</creatorcontrib><description>Background
Accessory breasts are usually located in the axilla. Symptoms associated with an axillary accessory breast (AAB) may newly develop or worsen after pregnancy. After childbirth, AAB engorgement and hyperplasia may occur due to milk formation. We evaluated the optimal time for AAB excision and assessed variations in clinical presentations and surgical outcomes associated with pregnancy.
Methods
In total, 540 women whose symptoms began from puberty and underwent AAB excision were retrospectively analyzed. Group 1 comprised 416 patients who underwent operations before pregnancy, and Group 2 comprised 124 patients who underwent operations after childbirth. AABs were classified according to the Damsoyu–Lee (DL) classification. Satisfaction was measured by pain and cosmesis 3 months postoperatively.
Results
Group 2 had more patients with severe symptoms [DL class II (
n
= 8, 6.5%) and III (
n
= 15, 12.1%)] than Group 1 (
p
= 0.049). The specimen weight and liposuction volume were greater in Group 2. The reoperation rate was also higher in Group 2 [loosening skin excision (
n
= 4, 3.2%) and remnant gland excision (
n
= 3, 2.4%)] (
p
= 0.032). In Group 2, 31 (25%) patients had AAB engorgement after childbirth and 7 (5.6%) had milk secretion from the accessory nipple after childbirth. The overall satisfaction score was lower in Group 2 than 1.
Conclusions
Pregnancy may cause accessory breast gland hyperplasia. After childbirth, symptoms such as AAB engorgement and milk secretion from the accessory nipple may occur. The optimal timing for operation for AAB appears to be before the onset of pregnancy because of lower reoperation rates and greater patient satisfaction.
Level of Evidence IV
This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors
www.springer.com/00266
.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0364-216X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1432-5241</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s00266-018-1128-8</identifier><identifier>PMID: 29626217</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York: Springer US</publisher><subject>Adolescent ; Adult ; Age Factors ; Axilla - surgery ; Breast ; Breast Diseases - diagnosis ; Breast Diseases - surgery ; Breasts ; Childbirth & labor ; Choristoma - surgery ; Cohort Studies ; Esthetics ; Female ; Humans ; Hyperplasia ; Logistic Models ; Mammaplasty - methods ; Medicine ; Medicine & Public Health ; Middle Aged ; Multivariate Analysis ; Nipples - abnormalities ; Nipples - surgery ; Original Article ; Otorhinolaryngology ; Patient satisfaction ; Patient Satisfaction - statistics & numerical data ; Plastic Surgery ; Pregnancy ; Retrospective Studies ; Risk Assessment ; Severity of Illness Index ; Time Factors ; Treatment Outcome ; Young Adult</subject><ispartof>Aesthetic plastic surgery, 2018-10, Vol.42 (5), p.1231-1243</ispartof><rights>Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature and International Society of Aesthetic Plastic Surgery 2018</rights><rights>Aesthetic Plastic Surgery is a copyright of Springer, (2018). All Rights Reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c372t-ef4fe0c00777cc6082f47f5963d88a7089671994c1596fbbe61e1d864e72f0343</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c372t-ef4fe0c00777cc6082f47f5963d88a7089671994c1596fbbe61e1d864e72f0343</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-0201-0627</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s00266-018-1128-8$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s00266-018-1128-8$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,27905,27906,41469,42538,51300</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29626217$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Lee, Sung Ryul</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lee, Seung Geun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Byun, Geon Young</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kim, Myoung Jin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Koo, Bum Hwan</creatorcontrib><title>Axillary Accessory Breast: Optimal Time for Operation</title><title>Aesthetic plastic surgery</title><addtitle>Aesth Plast Surg</addtitle><addtitle>Aesthetic Plast Surg</addtitle><description>Background
Accessory breasts are usually located in the axilla. Symptoms associated with an axillary accessory breast (AAB) may newly develop or worsen after pregnancy. After childbirth, AAB engorgement and hyperplasia may occur due to milk formation. We evaluated the optimal time for AAB excision and assessed variations in clinical presentations and surgical outcomes associated with pregnancy.
Methods
In total, 540 women whose symptoms began from puberty and underwent AAB excision were retrospectively analyzed. Group 1 comprised 416 patients who underwent operations before pregnancy, and Group 2 comprised 124 patients who underwent operations after childbirth. AABs were classified according to the Damsoyu–Lee (DL) classification. Satisfaction was measured by pain and cosmesis 3 months postoperatively.
Results
Group 2 had more patients with severe symptoms [DL class II (
n
= 8, 6.5%) and III (
n
= 15, 12.1%)] than Group 1 (
p
= 0.049). The specimen weight and liposuction volume were greater in Group 2. The reoperation rate was also higher in Group 2 [loosening skin excision (
n
= 4, 3.2%) and remnant gland excision (
n
= 3, 2.4%)] (
p
= 0.032). In Group 2, 31 (25%) patients had AAB engorgement after childbirth and 7 (5.6%) had milk secretion from the accessory nipple after childbirth. The overall satisfaction score was lower in Group 2 than 1.
Conclusions
Pregnancy may cause accessory breast gland hyperplasia. After childbirth, symptoms such as AAB engorgement and milk secretion from the accessory nipple may occur. The optimal timing for operation for AAB appears to be before the onset of pregnancy because of lower reoperation rates and greater patient satisfaction.
Level of Evidence IV
This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors
www.springer.com/00266
.</description><subject>Adolescent</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Age Factors</subject><subject>Axilla - surgery</subject><subject>Breast</subject><subject>Breast Diseases - diagnosis</subject><subject>Breast Diseases - surgery</subject><subject>Breasts</subject><subject>Childbirth & labor</subject><subject>Choristoma - surgery</subject><subject>Cohort Studies</subject><subject>Esthetics</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Hyperplasia</subject><subject>Logistic Models</subject><subject>Mammaplasty - methods</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Medicine & Public Health</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Multivariate Analysis</subject><subject>Nipples - abnormalities</subject><subject>Nipples - surgery</subject><subject>Original Article</subject><subject>Otorhinolaryngology</subject><subject>Patient satisfaction</subject><subject>Patient Satisfaction - statistics & numerical data</subject><subject>Plastic Surgery</subject><subject>Pregnancy</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><subject>Risk Assessment</subject><subject>Severity of Illness Index</subject><subject>Time Factors</subject><subject>Treatment Outcome</subject><subject>Young Adult</subject><issn>0364-216X</issn><issn>1432-5241</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kE1LAzEQhoMotlZ_gBdZ8OIlmpnNJllvtfgFhV4qeAvbNJEt-1GTLdh_b-pWBcHTDJNn3rzzEnIO7BoYkzeBMRSCMlAUABVVB2QIPEWaIYdDMmSp4BRBvA7ISQgrxgCl5MdkgLlAgSCHJBt_lFVV-G0yNsaG0MbuztsidLfJbN2VdVEl87K2iWt9HFhfdGXbnJIjV1TBnu3riLw83M8nT3Q6e3yejKfUpBI7ah13lploVUpjBFPouHRZLtKlUoVkKhcS8pwbiDO3WFgBFpZKcCvRsZSnI3LV6659-76xodN1GYyNhhvbboJGhpirePoOvfyDrtqNb6K7L4pnQgBECnrK-DYEb51e-3ij32pgepep7jPVMVO9y1SruHOxV94sarv82fgOMQLYAyE-NW_W_379v-on2QV-lA</recordid><startdate>20181001</startdate><enddate>20181001</enddate><creator>Lee, Sung Ryul</creator><creator>Lee, Seung Geun</creator><creator>Byun, Geon Young</creator><creator>Kim, Myoung Jin</creator><creator>Koo, Bum Hwan</creator><general>Springer US</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0201-0627</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20181001</creationdate><title>Axillary Accessory Breast: Optimal Time for Operation</title><author>Lee, Sung Ryul ; Lee, Seung Geun ; Byun, Geon Young ; Kim, Myoung Jin ; Koo, Bum Hwan</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c372t-ef4fe0c00777cc6082f47f5963d88a7089671994c1596fbbe61e1d864e72f0343</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Adolescent</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Age Factors</topic><topic>Axilla - surgery</topic><topic>Breast</topic><topic>Breast Diseases - diagnosis</topic><topic>Breast Diseases - surgery</topic><topic>Breasts</topic><topic>Childbirth & labor</topic><topic>Choristoma - surgery</topic><topic>Cohort Studies</topic><topic>Esthetics</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Hyperplasia</topic><topic>Logistic Models</topic><topic>Mammaplasty - methods</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Medicine & Public Health</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Multivariate Analysis</topic><topic>Nipples - abnormalities</topic><topic>Nipples - surgery</topic><topic>Original Article</topic><topic>Otorhinolaryngology</topic><topic>Patient satisfaction</topic><topic>Patient Satisfaction - statistics & numerical data</topic><topic>Plastic Surgery</topic><topic>Pregnancy</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><topic>Risk Assessment</topic><topic>Severity of Illness Index</topic><topic>Time Factors</topic><topic>Treatment Outcome</topic><topic>Young Adult</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Lee, Sung Ryul</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lee, Seung Geun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Byun, Geon Young</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kim, Myoung Jin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Koo, Bum Hwan</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health Medical collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Aesthetic plastic surgery</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Lee, Sung Ryul</au><au>Lee, Seung Geun</au><au>Byun, Geon Young</au><au>Kim, Myoung Jin</au><au>Koo, Bum Hwan</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Axillary Accessory Breast: Optimal Time for Operation</atitle><jtitle>Aesthetic plastic surgery</jtitle><stitle>Aesth Plast Surg</stitle><addtitle>Aesthetic Plast Surg</addtitle><date>2018-10-01</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>42</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>1231</spage><epage>1243</epage><pages>1231-1243</pages><issn>0364-216X</issn><eissn>1432-5241</eissn><abstract>Background
Accessory breasts are usually located in the axilla. Symptoms associated with an axillary accessory breast (AAB) may newly develop or worsen after pregnancy. After childbirth, AAB engorgement and hyperplasia may occur due to milk formation. We evaluated the optimal time for AAB excision and assessed variations in clinical presentations and surgical outcomes associated with pregnancy.
Methods
In total, 540 women whose symptoms began from puberty and underwent AAB excision were retrospectively analyzed. Group 1 comprised 416 patients who underwent operations before pregnancy, and Group 2 comprised 124 patients who underwent operations after childbirth. AABs were classified according to the Damsoyu–Lee (DL) classification. Satisfaction was measured by pain and cosmesis 3 months postoperatively.
Results
Group 2 had more patients with severe symptoms [DL class II (
n
= 8, 6.5%) and III (
n
= 15, 12.1%)] than Group 1 (
p
= 0.049). The specimen weight and liposuction volume were greater in Group 2. The reoperation rate was also higher in Group 2 [loosening skin excision (
n
= 4, 3.2%) and remnant gland excision (
n
= 3, 2.4%)] (
p
= 0.032). In Group 2, 31 (25%) patients had AAB engorgement after childbirth and 7 (5.6%) had milk secretion from the accessory nipple after childbirth. The overall satisfaction score was lower in Group 2 than 1.
Conclusions
Pregnancy may cause accessory breast gland hyperplasia. After childbirth, symptoms such as AAB engorgement and milk secretion from the accessory nipple may occur. The optimal timing for operation for AAB appears to be before the onset of pregnancy because of lower reoperation rates and greater patient satisfaction.
Level of Evidence IV
This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors
www.springer.com/00266
.</abstract><cop>New York</cop><pub>Springer US</pub><pmid>29626217</pmid><doi>10.1007/s00266-018-1128-8</doi><tpages>13</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0201-0627</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0364-216X |
ispartof | Aesthetic plastic surgery, 2018-10, Vol.42 (5), p.1231-1243 |
issn | 0364-216X 1432-5241 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2022981284 |
source | MEDLINE; SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings |
subjects | Adolescent Adult Age Factors Axilla - surgery Breast Breast Diseases - diagnosis Breast Diseases - surgery Breasts Childbirth & labor Choristoma - surgery Cohort Studies Esthetics Female Humans Hyperplasia Logistic Models Mammaplasty - methods Medicine Medicine & Public Health Middle Aged Multivariate Analysis Nipples - abnormalities Nipples - surgery Original Article Otorhinolaryngology Patient satisfaction Patient Satisfaction - statistics & numerical data Plastic Surgery Pregnancy Retrospective Studies Risk Assessment Severity of Illness Index Time Factors Treatment Outcome Young Adult |
title | Axillary Accessory Breast: Optimal Time for Operation |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-17T18%3A13%3A15IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Axillary%20Accessory%20Breast:%20Optimal%20Time%20for%20Operation&rft.jtitle=Aesthetic%20plastic%20surgery&rft.au=Lee,%20Sung%20Ryul&rft.date=2018-10-01&rft.volume=42&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=1231&rft.epage=1243&rft.pages=1231-1243&rft.issn=0364-216X&rft.eissn=1432-5241&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s00266-018-1128-8&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2022456611%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2022456611&rft_id=info:pmid/29626217&rfr_iscdi=true |