Cost-effectiveness analysis for the implementation of the EU Water Framework Directive
The EU Water Framework Directive (WFD) prescribes cost-effectiveness analysis (CEA) as an economic tool for the minimisation of costs when formulating programmes of measures to be implemented in the European river basins by the year 2009. The WFD does not specify, however, which approach to CEA has...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Water policy 2008-01, Vol.10 (3), p.207-220 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 220 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 3 |
| container_start_page | 207 |
| container_title | Water policy |
| container_volume | 10 |
| creator | VAN ENGELEN, Donné SEIDELIN, Christian VAN DER VEEREN, Rob BARTON, David N QUEB, Kabir |
| description | The EU Water Framework Directive (WFD) prescribes cost-effectiveness analysis (CEA) as an economic tool for the minimisation of costs when formulating programmes of measures to be implemented in the European river basins by the year 2009. The WFD does not specify, however, which approach to CEA has to be taken by the EU member states. In this paper the lack of a standardised approach to CEA for the implementation of the WFD is taken as the point of departure. The aim of the paper is to discuss and evaluate two pragmatic approaches to CEA based on case studies recently performed in The Netherlands and Denmark. The case studies allow for the comparison of a quantitative and a qualitative approach to CEA at the water body and river basin level and for an evaluation of the approaches in terms of their practical applicability, their transparency and the extent to which they render sound results for decision-making. Conclusions are drawn with regard to the suitability of the two approaches for the implementation of the EU WFD. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.2166/wp.2008.041 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_20227576</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>20227576</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c359t-4d085a016e7eebb3ca39e548c019a3e849fdf9b63eb47917735db373e0f545583</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdkE1LAzEQhoMoWD9O_oGA6EW2JpuvzVGqVaHgxeoxZLcT3Lq7WZPU0n_v1hYPnmYYnveFeRC6oGScUylv1_04J6QYE04P0IhqLTOthD4cdiZlpghVx-gkxiUZqCExQm8TH1MGzkGV6m_oIEZsO9tsYh2x8wGnD8B12zfQQpdsqn2Hvfu9Pszxu00Q8DTYFtY-fOL7Oux6ztCRs02E8_08RfPpw-vkKZu9PD5P7mZZxYROGV-QQlhCJSiAsmSVZRoELypCtWVQcO0WTpeSQcmVpkoxsSiZYkCc4EIU7BRd73r74L9WEJNp61hB09gO_CqanOS5EkoO4OU_cOlXYXg0Gqo5I7KgXAzUzY6qgo8xgDN9qFsbNoYSszVs1r3ZGjaD4YG-2nfaWNnGBdtVdfyL5ITxnAvOfgCVQXrR</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1943068145</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Cost-effectiveness analysis for the implementation of the EU Water Framework Directive</title><source>PAIS Index</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><creator>VAN ENGELEN, Donné ; SEIDELIN, Christian ; VAN DER VEEREN, Rob ; BARTON, David N ; QUEB, Kabir</creator><creatorcontrib>VAN ENGELEN, Donné ; SEIDELIN, Christian ; VAN DER VEEREN, Rob ; BARTON, David N ; QUEB, Kabir</creatorcontrib><description>The EU Water Framework Directive (WFD) prescribes cost-effectiveness analysis (CEA) as an economic tool for the minimisation of costs when formulating programmes of measures to be implemented in the European river basins by the year 2009. The WFD does not specify, however, which approach to CEA has to be taken by the EU member states. In this paper the lack of a standardised approach to CEA for the implementation of the WFD is taken as the point of departure. The aim of the paper is to discuss and evaluate two pragmatic approaches to CEA based on case studies recently performed in The Netherlands and Denmark. The case studies allow for the comparison of a quantitative and a qualitative approach to CEA at the water body and river basin level and for an evaluation of the approaches in terms of their practical applicability, their transparency and the extent to which they render sound results for decision-making. Conclusions are drawn with regard to the suitability of the two approaches for the implementation of the EU WFD.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1366-7017</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1996-9759</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.2166/wp.2008.041</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London: IWA</publisher><subject>Applied sciences ; Building economics. Cost ; Buildings. Public works ; Case studies ; Cost analysis ; Decision making ; Earth sciences ; Earth, ocean, space ; Economic analysis ; Evaluation ; Exact sciences and technology ; Frameworks ; Hydrology. Hydrogeology ; Implementation ; Quantitative analysis ; River basins ; Rivers ; Suitability ; Transparency ; Transparency (optical) ; Water ; Water bodies ; Water management ; Water resources ; Water supply. Pipings. Water treatment</subject><ispartof>Water policy, 2008-01, Vol.10 (3), p.207-220</ispartof><rights>2008 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright IWA Publishing Jun 2008</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c359t-4d085a016e7eebb3ca39e548c019a3e849fdf9b63eb47917735db373e0f545583</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,27847,27905,27906</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=20342454$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>VAN ENGELEN, Donné</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>SEIDELIN, Christian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>VAN DER VEEREN, Rob</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>BARTON, David N</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>QUEB, Kabir</creatorcontrib><title>Cost-effectiveness analysis for the implementation of the EU Water Framework Directive</title><title>Water policy</title><description>The EU Water Framework Directive (WFD) prescribes cost-effectiveness analysis (CEA) as an economic tool for the minimisation of costs when formulating programmes of measures to be implemented in the European river basins by the year 2009. The WFD does not specify, however, which approach to CEA has to be taken by the EU member states. In this paper the lack of a standardised approach to CEA for the implementation of the WFD is taken as the point of departure. The aim of the paper is to discuss and evaluate two pragmatic approaches to CEA based on case studies recently performed in The Netherlands and Denmark. The case studies allow for the comparison of a quantitative and a qualitative approach to CEA at the water body and river basin level and for an evaluation of the approaches in terms of their practical applicability, their transparency and the extent to which they render sound results for decision-making. Conclusions are drawn with regard to the suitability of the two approaches for the implementation of the EU WFD.</description><subject>Applied sciences</subject><subject>Building economics. Cost</subject><subject>Buildings. Public works</subject><subject>Case studies</subject><subject>Cost analysis</subject><subject>Decision making</subject><subject>Earth sciences</subject><subject>Earth, ocean, space</subject><subject>Economic analysis</subject><subject>Evaluation</subject><subject>Exact sciences and technology</subject><subject>Frameworks</subject><subject>Hydrology. Hydrogeology</subject><subject>Implementation</subject><subject>Quantitative analysis</subject><subject>River basins</subject><subject>Rivers</subject><subject>Suitability</subject><subject>Transparency</subject><subject>Transparency (optical)</subject><subject>Water</subject><subject>Water bodies</subject><subject>Water management</subject><subject>Water resources</subject><subject>Water supply. Pipings. Water treatment</subject><issn>1366-7017</issn><issn>1996-9759</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2008</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7TQ</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNpdkE1LAzEQhoMoWD9O_oGA6EW2JpuvzVGqVaHgxeoxZLcT3Lq7WZPU0n_v1hYPnmYYnveFeRC6oGScUylv1_04J6QYE04P0IhqLTOthD4cdiZlpghVx-gkxiUZqCExQm8TH1MGzkGV6m_oIEZsO9tsYh2x8wGnD8B12zfQQpdsqn2Hvfu9Pszxu00Q8DTYFtY-fOL7Oux6ztCRs02E8_08RfPpw-vkKZu9PD5P7mZZxYROGV-QQlhCJSiAsmSVZRoELypCtWVQcO0WTpeSQcmVpkoxsSiZYkCc4EIU7BRd73r74L9WEJNp61hB09gO_CqanOS5EkoO4OU_cOlXYXg0Gqo5I7KgXAzUzY6qgo8xgDN9qFsbNoYSszVs1r3ZGjaD4YG-2nfaWNnGBdtVdfyL5ITxnAvOfgCVQXrR</recordid><startdate>20080101</startdate><enddate>20080101</enddate><creator>VAN ENGELEN, Donné</creator><creator>SEIDELIN, Christian</creator><creator>VAN DER VEEREN, Rob</creator><creator>BARTON, David N</creator><creator>QUEB, Kabir</creator><general>IWA</general><general>IWA Publishing</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QH</scope><scope>7TQ</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>883</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>BKSAR</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DHY</scope><scope>DON</scope><scope>DPSOV</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H96</scope><scope>H97</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>KC-</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>M0F</scope><scope>M2L</scope><scope>M2R</scope><scope>PCBAR</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7U6</scope><scope>SOI</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20080101</creationdate><title>Cost-effectiveness analysis for the implementation of the EU Water Framework Directive</title><author>VAN ENGELEN, Donné ; SEIDELIN, Christian ; VAN DER VEEREN, Rob ; BARTON, David N ; QUEB, Kabir</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c359t-4d085a016e7eebb3ca39e548c019a3e849fdf9b63eb47917735db373e0f545583</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2008</creationdate><topic>Applied sciences</topic><topic>Building economics. Cost</topic><topic>Buildings. Public works</topic><topic>Case studies</topic><topic>Cost analysis</topic><topic>Decision making</topic><topic>Earth sciences</topic><topic>Earth, ocean, space</topic><topic>Economic analysis</topic><topic>Evaluation</topic><topic>Exact sciences and technology</topic><topic>Frameworks</topic><topic>Hydrology. Hydrogeology</topic><topic>Implementation</topic><topic>Quantitative analysis</topic><topic>River basins</topic><topic>Rivers</topic><topic>Suitability</topic><topic>Transparency</topic><topic>Transparency (optical)</topic><topic>Water</topic><topic>Water bodies</topic><topic>Water management</topic><topic>Water resources</topic><topic>Water supply. Pipings. Water treatment</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>VAN ENGELEN, Donné</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>SEIDELIN, Christian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>VAN DER VEEREN, Rob</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>BARTON, David N</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>QUEB, Kabir</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Aqualine</collection><collection>PAIS Index</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Trade & Industry (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric & Aquatic Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>PAIS International</collection><collection>PAIS International (Ovid)</collection><collection>Politics Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 2: Ocean Technology, Policy & Non-Living Resources</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 3: Aquatic Pollution & Environmental Quality</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Politics Collection</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Trade & Industry</collection><collection>Political Science Database</collection><collection>Social Science Database</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric & Aquatic Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Sustainability Science Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Water policy</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>VAN ENGELEN, Donné</au><au>SEIDELIN, Christian</au><au>VAN DER VEEREN, Rob</au><au>BARTON, David N</au><au>QUEB, Kabir</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Cost-effectiveness analysis for the implementation of the EU Water Framework Directive</atitle><jtitle>Water policy</jtitle><date>2008-01-01</date><risdate>2008</risdate><volume>10</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>207</spage><epage>220</epage><pages>207-220</pages><issn>1366-7017</issn><eissn>1996-9759</eissn><abstract>The EU Water Framework Directive (WFD) prescribes cost-effectiveness analysis (CEA) as an economic tool for the minimisation of costs when formulating programmes of measures to be implemented in the European river basins by the year 2009. The WFD does not specify, however, which approach to CEA has to be taken by the EU member states. In this paper the lack of a standardised approach to CEA for the implementation of the WFD is taken as the point of departure. The aim of the paper is to discuss and evaluate two pragmatic approaches to CEA based on case studies recently performed in The Netherlands and Denmark. The case studies allow for the comparison of a quantitative and a qualitative approach to CEA at the water body and river basin level and for an evaluation of the approaches in terms of their practical applicability, their transparency and the extent to which they render sound results for decision-making. Conclusions are drawn with regard to the suitability of the two approaches for the implementation of the EU WFD.</abstract><cop>London</cop><pub>IWA</pub><doi>10.2166/wp.2008.041</doi><tpages>14</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 1366-7017 |
| ispartof | Water policy, 2008-01, Vol.10 (3), p.207-220 |
| issn | 1366-7017 1996-9759 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_20227576 |
| source | PAIS Index; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals |
| subjects | Applied sciences Building economics. Cost Buildings. Public works Case studies Cost analysis Decision making Earth sciences Earth, ocean, space Economic analysis Evaluation Exact sciences and technology Frameworks Hydrology. Hydrogeology Implementation Quantitative analysis River basins Rivers Suitability Transparency Transparency (optical) Water Water bodies Water management Water resources Water supply. Pipings. Water treatment |
| title | Cost-effectiveness analysis for the implementation of the EU Water Framework Directive |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-20T21%3A58%3A56IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Cost-effectiveness%20analysis%20for%20the%20implementation%20of%20the%20EU%20Water%20Framework%20Directive&rft.jtitle=Water%20policy&rft.au=VAN%20ENGELEN,%20Donn%C3%A9&rft.date=2008-01-01&rft.volume=10&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=207&rft.epage=220&rft.pages=207-220&rft.issn=1366-7017&rft.eissn=1996-9759&rft_id=info:doi/10.2166/wp.2008.041&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E20227576%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1943068145&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |