Risk Assessment after Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Luminal Breast Cancer Using a Clinicomolecular Predictor
This study aimed to evaluate a modified EPclin test (mEPclin), a combination of EndoPredict (EP) score, post-neoadjuvant pathologic tumor size and nodal status, for predicting the risk of distance recurrence after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) in patients with residual estrogen receptor (ER)-posit...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Clinical cancer research 2018-07, Vol.24 (14), p.3358-3365 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 3365 |
---|---|
container_issue | 14 |
container_start_page | 3358 |
container_title | Clinical cancer research |
container_volume | 24 |
creator | Loibl, Sibylle Weber, Karsten Huober, Jens Krappmann, Kristin Marmé, Frederik Schem, Christian Engels, Knut Pfitzner, Berit Maria Kümmel, Sherko Furlanetto, Jenny Hartmann, Arndt Darb-Esfahani, Silvia Müller, Volkmar Staebler, Annette von Minckwitz, Gunter Kronenwett, Ralf Denkert, Carsten |
description | This study aimed to evaluate a modified EPclin test (mEPclin), a combination of EndoPredict (EP) score, post-neoadjuvant pathologic tumor size and nodal status, for predicting the risk of distance recurrence after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) in patients with residual estrogen receptor (ER)-positive/HER2-negative breast cancer. We also compared the prognostic power of the mEPclin with that of the CPS-EG score.
A total of 428 formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tumor samples from GeparTrio and GeparQuattro studies were evaluated for mRNA expression of eight cancer-related and three reference genes. The mEPclin score was computed using a modified algorithm and predefined cut-off values were used to classify each patient at low or high risk. Primary endpoint was disease-free survival (DFS).
A higher continuous mEPclin score was significantly associated with increased risk of relapse [HR, 2.16; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.86-2.51;
< 0.001] and death (HR, 2.28; 95% CI, 1.90-2.75;
< 0.001). Similarly, patients classified at high risk by dichotomous mEPclin showed significantly poorer DFS and overall survival compared with those at low risk. In contrast with CPS-EG, the mEPclin remained significantly prognostic for DFS in multivariate analysis (HR, 2.13; 95% CI, 1.73-2.63;
< 0.001). Combining CPS-EG and other clinicopathological variables with mEPclin yielded a significant improvement of the prognostic power for DFS versus without mEPclin (c-indices: 0.748 vs. 0.660;
< 0.001).
The mEPclin score independently predicted the risk of distance recurrence and provided additional prognostic information to the CPS-EG score to assess more accurately the prognosis after NACT in the luminal non-pCR patient population. Therefore, this approach can be used to select patients for additional post-neoadjuvant therapies.
. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-17-2947 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2022128012</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2022128012</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c384t-1f534f9dd256ca81b8684e00e91fb71cfeef87b2e6826a1ac23cce18411aed373</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdkUFP3DAQhS0EArrwE1pZ4tJLwOM4sXOkES2VVoBWcLa8zqTrbRJv7QRp_z2OYDn0NKOZ74007xHyFdg1QKFugEmVMZHz67peZSAzXgl5RM6hKGSW87I4Tv2BOSNfYtwyBgKYOCVnvCpBlSDPyXbl4l96GyPG2OMwUtOOGOgDetNsp1eTJvUGez9uMJjdnrqBLqfeDaajPwKamNZmsEnxEt3whxpad25w1ve-Qzt1JtCngI2zow8X5KQ1XcTLj7ogLz_vnuv7bPn463d9u8xsrsSYQVvkoq2ahhelNQrWqlQCGcMK2rUE2yK2Sq45loqXBozlubUISgAYbHKZL8j397u74P9NGEfdu2ix68yAfoqaM86BKwY8oVf_oVs_hfTcTEnGhISqSFTxTtngYwzY6l1wvQl7DUzPYejZaD0brVMYGqSew0i6bx_Xp3WPzafq4H7-BsxIhgE</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2070047195</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Risk Assessment after Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Luminal Breast Cancer Using a Clinicomolecular Predictor</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>American Association for Cancer Research</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Loibl, Sibylle ; Weber, Karsten ; Huober, Jens ; Krappmann, Kristin ; Marmé, Frederik ; Schem, Christian ; Engels, Knut ; Pfitzner, Berit Maria ; Kümmel, Sherko ; Furlanetto, Jenny ; Hartmann, Arndt ; Darb-Esfahani, Silvia ; Müller, Volkmar ; Staebler, Annette ; von Minckwitz, Gunter ; Kronenwett, Ralf ; Denkert, Carsten</creator><creatorcontrib>Loibl, Sibylle ; Weber, Karsten ; Huober, Jens ; Krappmann, Kristin ; Marmé, Frederik ; Schem, Christian ; Engels, Knut ; Pfitzner, Berit Maria ; Kümmel, Sherko ; Furlanetto, Jenny ; Hartmann, Arndt ; Darb-Esfahani, Silvia ; Müller, Volkmar ; Staebler, Annette ; von Minckwitz, Gunter ; Kronenwett, Ralf ; Denkert, Carsten</creatorcontrib><description>This study aimed to evaluate a modified EPclin test (mEPclin), a combination of EndoPredict (EP) score, post-neoadjuvant pathologic tumor size and nodal status, for predicting the risk of distance recurrence after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) in patients with residual estrogen receptor (ER)-positive/HER2-negative breast cancer. We also compared the prognostic power of the mEPclin with that of the CPS-EG score.
A total of 428 formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tumor samples from GeparTrio and GeparQuattro studies were evaluated for mRNA expression of eight cancer-related and three reference genes. The mEPclin score was computed using a modified algorithm and predefined cut-off values were used to classify each patient at low or high risk. Primary endpoint was disease-free survival (DFS).
A higher continuous mEPclin score was significantly associated with increased risk of relapse [HR, 2.16; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.86-2.51;
< 0.001] and death (HR, 2.28; 95% CI, 1.90-2.75;
< 0.001). Similarly, patients classified at high risk by dichotomous mEPclin showed significantly poorer DFS and overall survival compared with those at low risk. In contrast with CPS-EG, the mEPclin remained significantly prognostic for DFS in multivariate analysis (HR, 2.13; 95% CI, 1.73-2.63;
< 0.001). Combining CPS-EG and other clinicopathological variables with mEPclin yielded a significant improvement of the prognostic power for DFS versus without mEPclin (c-indices: 0.748 vs. 0.660;
< 0.001).
The mEPclin score independently predicted the risk of distance recurrence and provided additional prognostic information to the CPS-EG score to assess more accurately the prognosis after NACT in the luminal non-pCR patient population. Therefore, this approach can be used to select patients for additional post-neoadjuvant therapies.
.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1078-0432</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1557-3265</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-17-2947</identifier><identifier>PMID: 29618617</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: American Association for Cancer Research Inc</publisher><subject>Adult ; Aged ; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols - therapeutic use ; Biomarkers, Tumor ; Breast cancer ; Breast Neoplasms - drug therapy ; Breast Neoplasms - etiology ; Breast Neoplasms - metabolism ; Breast Neoplasms - pathology ; Cancer ; Chemotherapy ; Chemotherapy, Adjuvant ; Clinical Trials, Phase III as Topic ; Combined Modality Therapy ; Confidence intervals ; ErbB-2 protein ; Estrogen receptors ; Estrogens ; Experimental design ; Female ; Gene expression ; Gene Expression Profiling ; Health risks ; Humans ; Kaplan-Meier Estimate ; Medical prognosis ; Middle Aged ; Multivariate analysis ; Neoadjuvant Therapy ; Neoplasm Grading ; Neoplasm Staging ; Paraffin ; Paraffins ; Patients ; Prognosis ; Risk Assessment ; Survival ; Treatment Outcome ; Tumors</subject><ispartof>Clinical cancer research, 2018-07, Vol.24 (14), p.3358-3365</ispartof><rights>2018 American Association for Cancer Research.</rights><rights>Copyright American Association for Cancer Research Inc Jul 15, 2018</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c384t-1f534f9dd256ca81b8684e00e91fb71cfeef87b2e6826a1ac23cce18411aed373</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c384t-1f534f9dd256ca81b8684e00e91fb71cfeef87b2e6826a1ac23cce18411aed373</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-6591-3367</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3343,27903,27904</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29618617$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Loibl, Sibylle</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Weber, Karsten</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Huober, Jens</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Krappmann, Kristin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Marmé, Frederik</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schem, Christian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Engels, Knut</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pfitzner, Berit Maria</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kümmel, Sherko</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Furlanetto, Jenny</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hartmann, Arndt</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Darb-Esfahani, Silvia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Müller, Volkmar</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Staebler, Annette</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>von Minckwitz, Gunter</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kronenwett, Ralf</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Denkert, Carsten</creatorcontrib><title>Risk Assessment after Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Luminal Breast Cancer Using a Clinicomolecular Predictor</title><title>Clinical cancer research</title><addtitle>Clin Cancer Res</addtitle><description>This study aimed to evaluate a modified EPclin test (mEPclin), a combination of EndoPredict (EP) score, post-neoadjuvant pathologic tumor size and nodal status, for predicting the risk of distance recurrence after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) in patients with residual estrogen receptor (ER)-positive/HER2-negative breast cancer. We also compared the prognostic power of the mEPclin with that of the CPS-EG score.
A total of 428 formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tumor samples from GeparTrio and GeparQuattro studies were evaluated for mRNA expression of eight cancer-related and three reference genes. The mEPclin score was computed using a modified algorithm and predefined cut-off values were used to classify each patient at low or high risk. Primary endpoint was disease-free survival (DFS).
A higher continuous mEPclin score was significantly associated with increased risk of relapse [HR, 2.16; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.86-2.51;
< 0.001] and death (HR, 2.28; 95% CI, 1.90-2.75;
< 0.001). Similarly, patients classified at high risk by dichotomous mEPclin showed significantly poorer DFS and overall survival compared with those at low risk. In contrast with CPS-EG, the mEPclin remained significantly prognostic for DFS in multivariate analysis (HR, 2.13; 95% CI, 1.73-2.63;
< 0.001). Combining CPS-EG and other clinicopathological variables with mEPclin yielded a significant improvement of the prognostic power for DFS versus without mEPclin (c-indices: 0.748 vs. 0.660;
< 0.001).
The mEPclin score independently predicted the risk of distance recurrence and provided additional prognostic information to the CPS-EG score to assess more accurately the prognosis after NACT in the luminal non-pCR patient population. Therefore, this approach can be used to select patients for additional post-neoadjuvant therapies.
.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Biomarkers, Tumor</subject><subject>Breast cancer</subject><subject>Breast Neoplasms - drug therapy</subject><subject>Breast Neoplasms - etiology</subject><subject>Breast Neoplasms - metabolism</subject><subject>Breast Neoplasms - pathology</subject><subject>Cancer</subject><subject>Chemotherapy</subject><subject>Chemotherapy, Adjuvant</subject><subject>Clinical Trials, Phase III as Topic</subject><subject>Combined Modality Therapy</subject><subject>Confidence intervals</subject><subject>ErbB-2 protein</subject><subject>Estrogen receptors</subject><subject>Estrogens</subject><subject>Experimental design</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Gene expression</subject><subject>Gene Expression Profiling</subject><subject>Health risks</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Kaplan-Meier Estimate</subject><subject>Medical prognosis</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Multivariate analysis</subject><subject>Neoadjuvant Therapy</subject><subject>Neoplasm Grading</subject><subject>Neoplasm Staging</subject><subject>Paraffin</subject><subject>Paraffins</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>Prognosis</subject><subject>Risk Assessment</subject><subject>Survival</subject><subject>Treatment Outcome</subject><subject>Tumors</subject><issn>1078-0432</issn><issn>1557-3265</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNpdkUFP3DAQhS0EArrwE1pZ4tJLwOM4sXOkES2VVoBWcLa8zqTrbRJv7QRp_z2OYDn0NKOZ74007xHyFdg1QKFugEmVMZHz67peZSAzXgl5RM6hKGSW87I4Tv2BOSNfYtwyBgKYOCVnvCpBlSDPyXbl4l96GyPG2OMwUtOOGOgDetNsp1eTJvUGez9uMJjdnrqBLqfeDaajPwKamNZmsEnxEt3whxpad25w1ve-Qzt1JtCngI2zow8X5KQ1XcTLj7ogLz_vnuv7bPn463d9u8xsrsSYQVvkoq2ahhelNQrWqlQCGcMK2rUE2yK2Sq45loqXBozlubUISgAYbHKZL8j397u74P9NGEfdu2ix68yAfoqaM86BKwY8oVf_oVs_hfTcTEnGhISqSFTxTtngYwzY6l1wvQl7DUzPYejZaD0brVMYGqSew0i6bx_Xp3WPzafq4H7-BsxIhgE</recordid><startdate>20180715</startdate><enddate>20180715</enddate><creator>Loibl, Sibylle</creator><creator>Weber, Karsten</creator><creator>Huober, Jens</creator><creator>Krappmann, Kristin</creator><creator>Marmé, Frederik</creator><creator>Schem, Christian</creator><creator>Engels, Knut</creator><creator>Pfitzner, Berit Maria</creator><creator>Kümmel, Sherko</creator><creator>Furlanetto, Jenny</creator><creator>Hartmann, Arndt</creator><creator>Darb-Esfahani, Silvia</creator><creator>Müller, Volkmar</creator><creator>Staebler, Annette</creator><creator>von Minckwitz, Gunter</creator><creator>Kronenwett, Ralf</creator><creator>Denkert, Carsten</creator><general>American Association for Cancer Research Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>7TO</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6591-3367</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20180715</creationdate><title>Risk Assessment after Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Luminal Breast Cancer Using a Clinicomolecular Predictor</title><author>Loibl, Sibylle ; Weber, Karsten ; Huober, Jens ; Krappmann, Kristin ; Marmé, Frederik ; Schem, Christian ; Engels, Knut ; Pfitzner, Berit Maria ; Kümmel, Sherko ; Furlanetto, Jenny ; Hartmann, Arndt ; Darb-Esfahani, Silvia ; Müller, Volkmar ; Staebler, Annette ; von Minckwitz, Gunter ; Kronenwett, Ralf ; Denkert, Carsten</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c384t-1f534f9dd256ca81b8684e00e91fb71cfeef87b2e6826a1ac23cce18411aed373</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Biomarkers, Tumor</topic><topic>Breast cancer</topic><topic>Breast Neoplasms - drug therapy</topic><topic>Breast Neoplasms - etiology</topic><topic>Breast Neoplasms - metabolism</topic><topic>Breast Neoplasms - pathology</topic><topic>Cancer</topic><topic>Chemotherapy</topic><topic>Chemotherapy, Adjuvant</topic><topic>Clinical Trials, Phase III as Topic</topic><topic>Combined Modality Therapy</topic><topic>Confidence intervals</topic><topic>ErbB-2 protein</topic><topic>Estrogen receptors</topic><topic>Estrogens</topic><topic>Experimental design</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Gene expression</topic><topic>Gene Expression Profiling</topic><topic>Health risks</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Kaplan-Meier Estimate</topic><topic>Medical prognosis</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Multivariate analysis</topic><topic>Neoadjuvant Therapy</topic><topic>Neoplasm Grading</topic><topic>Neoplasm Staging</topic><topic>Paraffin</topic><topic>Paraffins</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>Prognosis</topic><topic>Risk Assessment</topic><topic>Survival</topic><topic>Treatment Outcome</topic><topic>Tumors</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Loibl, Sibylle</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Weber, Karsten</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Huober, Jens</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Krappmann, Kristin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Marmé, Frederik</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schem, Christian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Engels, Knut</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pfitzner, Berit Maria</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kümmel, Sherko</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Furlanetto, Jenny</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hartmann, Arndt</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Darb-Esfahani, Silvia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Müller, Volkmar</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Staebler, Annette</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>von Minckwitz, Gunter</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kronenwett, Ralf</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Denkert, Carsten</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>Oncogenes and Growth Factors Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Clinical cancer research</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Loibl, Sibylle</au><au>Weber, Karsten</au><au>Huober, Jens</au><au>Krappmann, Kristin</au><au>Marmé, Frederik</au><au>Schem, Christian</au><au>Engels, Knut</au><au>Pfitzner, Berit Maria</au><au>Kümmel, Sherko</au><au>Furlanetto, Jenny</au><au>Hartmann, Arndt</au><au>Darb-Esfahani, Silvia</au><au>Müller, Volkmar</au><au>Staebler, Annette</au><au>von Minckwitz, Gunter</au><au>Kronenwett, Ralf</au><au>Denkert, Carsten</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Risk Assessment after Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Luminal Breast Cancer Using a Clinicomolecular Predictor</atitle><jtitle>Clinical cancer research</jtitle><addtitle>Clin Cancer Res</addtitle><date>2018-07-15</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>24</volume><issue>14</issue><spage>3358</spage><epage>3365</epage><pages>3358-3365</pages><issn>1078-0432</issn><eissn>1557-3265</eissn><abstract>This study aimed to evaluate a modified EPclin test (mEPclin), a combination of EndoPredict (EP) score, post-neoadjuvant pathologic tumor size and nodal status, for predicting the risk of distance recurrence after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) in patients with residual estrogen receptor (ER)-positive/HER2-negative breast cancer. We also compared the prognostic power of the mEPclin with that of the CPS-EG score.
A total of 428 formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tumor samples from GeparTrio and GeparQuattro studies were evaluated for mRNA expression of eight cancer-related and three reference genes. The mEPclin score was computed using a modified algorithm and predefined cut-off values were used to classify each patient at low or high risk. Primary endpoint was disease-free survival (DFS).
A higher continuous mEPclin score was significantly associated with increased risk of relapse [HR, 2.16; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.86-2.51;
< 0.001] and death (HR, 2.28; 95% CI, 1.90-2.75;
< 0.001). Similarly, patients classified at high risk by dichotomous mEPclin showed significantly poorer DFS and overall survival compared with those at low risk. In contrast with CPS-EG, the mEPclin remained significantly prognostic for DFS in multivariate analysis (HR, 2.13; 95% CI, 1.73-2.63;
< 0.001). Combining CPS-EG and other clinicopathological variables with mEPclin yielded a significant improvement of the prognostic power for DFS versus without mEPclin (c-indices: 0.748 vs. 0.660;
< 0.001).
The mEPclin score independently predicted the risk of distance recurrence and provided additional prognostic information to the CPS-EG score to assess more accurately the prognosis after NACT in the luminal non-pCR patient population. Therefore, this approach can be used to select patients for additional post-neoadjuvant therapies.
.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>American Association for Cancer Research Inc</pub><pmid>29618617</pmid><doi>10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-17-2947</doi><tpages>8</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6591-3367</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1078-0432 |
ispartof | Clinical cancer research, 2018-07, Vol.24 (14), p.3358-3365 |
issn | 1078-0432 1557-3265 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2022128012 |
source | MEDLINE; American Association for Cancer Research; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; Alma/SFX Local Collection |
subjects | Adult Aged Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols - therapeutic use Biomarkers, Tumor Breast cancer Breast Neoplasms - drug therapy Breast Neoplasms - etiology Breast Neoplasms - metabolism Breast Neoplasms - pathology Cancer Chemotherapy Chemotherapy, Adjuvant Clinical Trials, Phase III as Topic Combined Modality Therapy Confidence intervals ErbB-2 protein Estrogen receptors Estrogens Experimental design Female Gene expression Gene Expression Profiling Health risks Humans Kaplan-Meier Estimate Medical prognosis Middle Aged Multivariate analysis Neoadjuvant Therapy Neoplasm Grading Neoplasm Staging Paraffin Paraffins Patients Prognosis Risk Assessment Survival Treatment Outcome Tumors |
title | Risk Assessment after Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Luminal Breast Cancer Using a Clinicomolecular Predictor |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-27T22%3A33%3A10IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Risk%20Assessment%20after%20Neoadjuvant%20Chemotherapy%20in%20Luminal%20Breast%20Cancer%20Using%20a%20Clinicomolecular%20Predictor&rft.jtitle=Clinical%20cancer%20research&rft.au=Loibl,%20Sibylle&rft.date=2018-07-15&rft.volume=24&rft.issue=14&rft.spage=3358&rft.epage=3365&rft.pages=3358-3365&rft.issn=1078-0432&rft.eissn=1557-3265&rft_id=info:doi/10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-17-2947&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2022128012%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2070047195&rft_id=info:pmid/29618617&rfr_iscdi=true |