Risk Assessment after Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Luminal Breast Cancer Using a Clinicomolecular Predictor

This study aimed to evaluate a modified EPclin test (mEPclin), a combination of EndoPredict (EP) score, post-neoadjuvant pathologic tumor size and nodal status, for predicting the risk of distance recurrence after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) in patients with residual estrogen receptor (ER)-posit...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Clinical cancer research 2018-07, Vol.24 (14), p.3358-3365
Hauptverfasser: Loibl, Sibylle, Weber, Karsten, Huober, Jens, Krappmann, Kristin, Marmé, Frederik, Schem, Christian, Engels, Knut, Pfitzner, Berit Maria, Kümmel, Sherko, Furlanetto, Jenny, Hartmann, Arndt, Darb-Esfahani, Silvia, Müller, Volkmar, Staebler, Annette, von Minckwitz, Gunter, Kronenwett, Ralf, Denkert, Carsten
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 3365
container_issue 14
container_start_page 3358
container_title Clinical cancer research
container_volume 24
creator Loibl, Sibylle
Weber, Karsten
Huober, Jens
Krappmann, Kristin
Marmé, Frederik
Schem, Christian
Engels, Knut
Pfitzner, Berit Maria
Kümmel, Sherko
Furlanetto, Jenny
Hartmann, Arndt
Darb-Esfahani, Silvia
Müller, Volkmar
Staebler, Annette
von Minckwitz, Gunter
Kronenwett, Ralf
Denkert, Carsten
description This study aimed to evaluate a modified EPclin test (mEPclin), a combination of EndoPredict (EP) score, post-neoadjuvant pathologic tumor size and nodal status, for predicting the risk of distance recurrence after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) in patients with residual estrogen receptor (ER)-positive/HER2-negative breast cancer. We also compared the prognostic power of the mEPclin with that of the CPS-EG score. A total of 428 formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tumor samples from GeparTrio and GeparQuattro studies were evaluated for mRNA expression of eight cancer-related and three reference genes. The mEPclin score was computed using a modified algorithm and predefined cut-off values were used to classify each patient at low or high risk. Primary endpoint was disease-free survival (DFS). A higher continuous mEPclin score was significantly associated with increased risk of relapse [HR, 2.16; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.86-2.51; < 0.001] and death (HR, 2.28; 95% CI, 1.90-2.75; < 0.001). Similarly, patients classified at high risk by dichotomous mEPclin showed significantly poorer DFS and overall survival compared with those at low risk. In contrast with CPS-EG, the mEPclin remained significantly prognostic for DFS in multivariate analysis (HR, 2.13; 95% CI, 1.73-2.63; < 0.001). Combining CPS-EG and other clinicopathological variables with mEPclin yielded a significant improvement of the prognostic power for DFS versus without mEPclin (c-indices: 0.748 vs. 0.660; < 0.001). The mEPclin score independently predicted the risk of distance recurrence and provided additional prognostic information to the CPS-EG score to assess more accurately the prognosis after NACT in the luminal non-pCR patient population. Therefore, this approach can be used to select patients for additional post-neoadjuvant therapies. .
doi_str_mv 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-17-2947
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2022128012</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2022128012</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c384t-1f534f9dd256ca81b8684e00e91fb71cfeef87b2e6826a1ac23cce18411aed373</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdkUFP3DAQhS0EArrwE1pZ4tJLwOM4sXOkES2VVoBWcLa8zqTrbRJv7QRp_z2OYDn0NKOZ74007xHyFdg1QKFugEmVMZHz67peZSAzXgl5RM6hKGSW87I4Tv2BOSNfYtwyBgKYOCVnvCpBlSDPyXbl4l96GyPG2OMwUtOOGOgDetNsp1eTJvUGez9uMJjdnrqBLqfeDaajPwKamNZmsEnxEt3whxpad25w1ve-Qzt1JtCngI2zow8X5KQ1XcTLj7ogLz_vnuv7bPn463d9u8xsrsSYQVvkoq2ahhelNQrWqlQCGcMK2rUE2yK2Sq45loqXBozlubUISgAYbHKZL8j397u74P9NGEfdu2ix68yAfoqaM86BKwY8oVf_oVs_hfTcTEnGhISqSFTxTtngYwzY6l1wvQl7DUzPYejZaD0brVMYGqSew0i6bx_Xp3WPzafq4H7-BsxIhgE</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2070047195</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Risk Assessment after Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Luminal Breast Cancer Using a Clinicomolecular Predictor</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>American Association for Cancer Research</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Loibl, Sibylle ; Weber, Karsten ; Huober, Jens ; Krappmann, Kristin ; Marmé, Frederik ; Schem, Christian ; Engels, Knut ; Pfitzner, Berit Maria ; Kümmel, Sherko ; Furlanetto, Jenny ; Hartmann, Arndt ; Darb-Esfahani, Silvia ; Müller, Volkmar ; Staebler, Annette ; von Minckwitz, Gunter ; Kronenwett, Ralf ; Denkert, Carsten</creator><creatorcontrib>Loibl, Sibylle ; Weber, Karsten ; Huober, Jens ; Krappmann, Kristin ; Marmé, Frederik ; Schem, Christian ; Engels, Knut ; Pfitzner, Berit Maria ; Kümmel, Sherko ; Furlanetto, Jenny ; Hartmann, Arndt ; Darb-Esfahani, Silvia ; Müller, Volkmar ; Staebler, Annette ; von Minckwitz, Gunter ; Kronenwett, Ralf ; Denkert, Carsten</creatorcontrib><description>This study aimed to evaluate a modified EPclin test (mEPclin), a combination of EndoPredict (EP) score, post-neoadjuvant pathologic tumor size and nodal status, for predicting the risk of distance recurrence after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) in patients with residual estrogen receptor (ER)-positive/HER2-negative breast cancer. We also compared the prognostic power of the mEPclin with that of the CPS-EG score. A total of 428 formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tumor samples from GeparTrio and GeparQuattro studies were evaluated for mRNA expression of eight cancer-related and three reference genes. The mEPclin score was computed using a modified algorithm and predefined cut-off values were used to classify each patient at low or high risk. Primary endpoint was disease-free survival (DFS). A higher continuous mEPclin score was significantly associated with increased risk of relapse [HR, 2.16; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.86-2.51; &lt; 0.001] and death (HR, 2.28; 95% CI, 1.90-2.75; &lt; 0.001). Similarly, patients classified at high risk by dichotomous mEPclin showed significantly poorer DFS and overall survival compared with those at low risk. In contrast with CPS-EG, the mEPclin remained significantly prognostic for DFS in multivariate analysis (HR, 2.13; 95% CI, 1.73-2.63; &lt; 0.001). Combining CPS-EG and other clinicopathological variables with mEPclin yielded a significant improvement of the prognostic power for DFS versus without mEPclin (c-indices: 0.748 vs. 0.660; &lt; 0.001). The mEPclin score independently predicted the risk of distance recurrence and provided additional prognostic information to the CPS-EG score to assess more accurately the prognosis after NACT in the luminal non-pCR patient population. Therefore, this approach can be used to select patients for additional post-neoadjuvant therapies. .</description><identifier>ISSN: 1078-0432</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1557-3265</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-17-2947</identifier><identifier>PMID: 29618617</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: American Association for Cancer Research Inc</publisher><subject>Adult ; Aged ; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols - therapeutic use ; Biomarkers, Tumor ; Breast cancer ; Breast Neoplasms - drug therapy ; Breast Neoplasms - etiology ; Breast Neoplasms - metabolism ; Breast Neoplasms - pathology ; Cancer ; Chemotherapy ; Chemotherapy, Adjuvant ; Clinical Trials, Phase III as Topic ; Combined Modality Therapy ; Confidence intervals ; ErbB-2 protein ; Estrogen receptors ; Estrogens ; Experimental design ; Female ; Gene expression ; Gene Expression Profiling ; Health risks ; Humans ; Kaplan-Meier Estimate ; Medical prognosis ; Middle Aged ; Multivariate analysis ; Neoadjuvant Therapy ; Neoplasm Grading ; Neoplasm Staging ; Paraffin ; Paraffins ; Patients ; Prognosis ; Risk Assessment ; Survival ; Treatment Outcome ; Tumors</subject><ispartof>Clinical cancer research, 2018-07, Vol.24 (14), p.3358-3365</ispartof><rights>2018 American Association for Cancer Research.</rights><rights>Copyright American Association for Cancer Research Inc Jul 15, 2018</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c384t-1f534f9dd256ca81b8684e00e91fb71cfeef87b2e6826a1ac23cce18411aed373</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c384t-1f534f9dd256ca81b8684e00e91fb71cfeef87b2e6826a1ac23cce18411aed373</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-6591-3367</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3343,27903,27904</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29618617$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Loibl, Sibylle</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Weber, Karsten</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Huober, Jens</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Krappmann, Kristin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Marmé, Frederik</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schem, Christian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Engels, Knut</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pfitzner, Berit Maria</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kümmel, Sherko</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Furlanetto, Jenny</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hartmann, Arndt</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Darb-Esfahani, Silvia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Müller, Volkmar</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Staebler, Annette</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>von Minckwitz, Gunter</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kronenwett, Ralf</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Denkert, Carsten</creatorcontrib><title>Risk Assessment after Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Luminal Breast Cancer Using a Clinicomolecular Predictor</title><title>Clinical cancer research</title><addtitle>Clin Cancer Res</addtitle><description>This study aimed to evaluate a modified EPclin test (mEPclin), a combination of EndoPredict (EP) score, post-neoadjuvant pathologic tumor size and nodal status, for predicting the risk of distance recurrence after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) in patients with residual estrogen receptor (ER)-positive/HER2-negative breast cancer. We also compared the prognostic power of the mEPclin with that of the CPS-EG score. A total of 428 formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tumor samples from GeparTrio and GeparQuattro studies were evaluated for mRNA expression of eight cancer-related and three reference genes. The mEPclin score was computed using a modified algorithm and predefined cut-off values were used to classify each patient at low or high risk. Primary endpoint was disease-free survival (DFS). A higher continuous mEPclin score was significantly associated with increased risk of relapse [HR, 2.16; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.86-2.51; &lt; 0.001] and death (HR, 2.28; 95% CI, 1.90-2.75; &lt; 0.001). Similarly, patients classified at high risk by dichotomous mEPclin showed significantly poorer DFS and overall survival compared with those at low risk. In contrast with CPS-EG, the mEPclin remained significantly prognostic for DFS in multivariate analysis (HR, 2.13; 95% CI, 1.73-2.63; &lt; 0.001). Combining CPS-EG and other clinicopathological variables with mEPclin yielded a significant improvement of the prognostic power for DFS versus without mEPclin (c-indices: 0.748 vs. 0.660; &lt; 0.001). The mEPclin score independently predicted the risk of distance recurrence and provided additional prognostic information to the CPS-EG score to assess more accurately the prognosis after NACT in the luminal non-pCR patient population. Therefore, this approach can be used to select patients for additional post-neoadjuvant therapies. .</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Biomarkers, Tumor</subject><subject>Breast cancer</subject><subject>Breast Neoplasms - drug therapy</subject><subject>Breast Neoplasms - etiology</subject><subject>Breast Neoplasms - metabolism</subject><subject>Breast Neoplasms - pathology</subject><subject>Cancer</subject><subject>Chemotherapy</subject><subject>Chemotherapy, Adjuvant</subject><subject>Clinical Trials, Phase III as Topic</subject><subject>Combined Modality Therapy</subject><subject>Confidence intervals</subject><subject>ErbB-2 protein</subject><subject>Estrogen receptors</subject><subject>Estrogens</subject><subject>Experimental design</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Gene expression</subject><subject>Gene Expression Profiling</subject><subject>Health risks</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Kaplan-Meier Estimate</subject><subject>Medical prognosis</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Multivariate analysis</subject><subject>Neoadjuvant Therapy</subject><subject>Neoplasm Grading</subject><subject>Neoplasm Staging</subject><subject>Paraffin</subject><subject>Paraffins</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>Prognosis</subject><subject>Risk Assessment</subject><subject>Survival</subject><subject>Treatment Outcome</subject><subject>Tumors</subject><issn>1078-0432</issn><issn>1557-3265</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNpdkUFP3DAQhS0EArrwE1pZ4tJLwOM4sXOkES2VVoBWcLa8zqTrbRJv7QRp_z2OYDn0NKOZ74007xHyFdg1QKFugEmVMZHz67peZSAzXgl5RM6hKGSW87I4Tv2BOSNfYtwyBgKYOCVnvCpBlSDPyXbl4l96GyPG2OMwUtOOGOgDetNsp1eTJvUGez9uMJjdnrqBLqfeDaajPwKamNZmsEnxEt3whxpad25w1ve-Qzt1JtCngI2zow8X5KQ1XcTLj7ogLz_vnuv7bPn463d9u8xsrsSYQVvkoq2ahhelNQrWqlQCGcMK2rUE2yK2Sq45loqXBozlubUISgAYbHKZL8j397u74P9NGEfdu2ix68yAfoqaM86BKwY8oVf_oVs_hfTcTEnGhISqSFTxTtngYwzY6l1wvQl7DUzPYejZaD0brVMYGqSew0i6bx_Xp3WPzafq4H7-BsxIhgE</recordid><startdate>20180715</startdate><enddate>20180715</enddate><creator>Loibl, Sibylle</creator><creator>Weber, Karsten</creator><creator>Huober, Jens</creator><creator>Krappmann, Kristin</creator><creator>Marmé, Frederik</creator><creator>Schem, Christian</creator><creator>Engels, Knut</creator><creator>Pfitzner, Berit Maria</creator><creator>Kümmel, Sherko</creator><creator>Furlanetto, Jenny</creator><creator>Hartmann, Arndt</creator><creator>Darb-Esfahani, Silvia</creator><creator>Müller, Volkmar</creator><creator>Staebler, Annette</creator><creator>von Minckwitz, Gunter</creator><creator>Kronenwett, Ralf</creator><creator>Denkert, Carsten</creator><general>American Association for Cancer Research Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>7TO</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6591-3367</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20180715</creationdate><title>Risk Assessment after Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Luminal Breast Cancer Using a Clinicomolecular Predictor</title><author>Loibl, Sibylle ; Weber, Karsten ; Huober, Jens ; Krappmann, Kristin ; Marmé, Frederik ; Schem, Christian ; Engels, Knut ; Pfitzner, Berit Maria ; Kümmel, Sherko ; Furlanetto, Jenny ; Hartmann, Arndt ; Darb-Esfahani, Silvia ; Müller, Volkmar ; Staebler, Annette ; von Minckwitz, Gunter ; Kronenwett, Ralf ; Denkert, Carsten</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c384t-1f534f9dd256ca81b8684e00e91fb71cfeef87b2e6826a1ac23cce18411aed373</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Biomarkers, Tumor</topic><topic>Breast cancer</topic><topic>Breast Neoplasms - drug therapy</topic><topic>Breast Neoplasms - etiology</topic><topic>Breast Neoplasms - metabolism</topic><topic>Breast Neoplasms - pathology</topic><topic>Cancer</topic><topic>Chemotherapy</topic><topic>Chemotherapy, Adjuvant</topic><topic>Clinical Trials, Phase III as Topic</topic><topic>Combined Modality Therapy</topic><topic>Confidence intervals</topic><topic>ErbB-2 protein</topic><topic>Estrogen receptors</topic><topic>Estrogens</topic><topic>Experimental design</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Gene expression</topic><topic>Gene Expression Profiling</topic><topic>Health risks</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Kaplan-Meier Estimate</topic><topic>Medical prognosis</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Multivariate analysis</topic><topic>Neoadjuvant Therapy</topic><topic>Neoplasm Grading</topic><topic>Neoplasm Staging</topic><topic>Paraffin</topic><topic>Paraffins</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>Prognosis</topic><topic>Risk Assessment</topic><topic>Survival</topic><topic>Treatment Outcome</topic><topic>Tumors</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Loibl, Sibylle</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Weber, Karsten</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Huober, Jens</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Krappmann, Kristin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Marmé, Frederik</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schem, Christian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Engels, Knut</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pfitzner, Berit Maria</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kümmel, Sherko</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Furlanetto, Jenny</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hartmann, Arndt</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Darb-Esfahani, Silvia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Müller, Volkmar</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Staebler, Annette</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>von Minckwitz, Gunter</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kronenwett, Ralf</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Denkert, Carsten</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>Oncogenes and Growth Factors Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Clinical cancer research</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Loibl, Sibylle</au><au>Weber, Karsten</au><au>Huober, Jens</au><au>Krappmann, Kristin</au><au>Marmé, Frederik</au><au>Schem, Christian</au><au>Engels, Knut</au><au>Pfitzner, Berit Maria</au><au>Kümmel, Sherko</au><au>Furlanetto, Jenny</au><au>Hartmann, Arndt</au><au>Darb-Esfahani, Silvia</au><au>Müller, Volkmar</au><au>Staebler, Annette</au><au>von Minckwitz, Gunter</au><au>Kronenwett, Ralf</au><au>Denkert, Carsten</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Risk Assessment after Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Luminal Breast Cancer Using a Clinicomolecular Predictor</atitle><jtitle>Clinical cancer research</jtitle><addtitle>Clin Cancer Res</addtitle><date>2018-07-15</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>24</volume><issue>14</issue><spage>3358</spage><epage>3365</epage><pages>3358-3365</pages><issn>1078-0432</issn><eissn>1557-3265</eissn><abstract>This study aimed to evaluate a modified EPclin test (mEPclin), a combination of EndoPredict (EP) score, post-neoadjuvant pathologic tumor size and nodal status, for predicting the risk of distance recurrence after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) in patients with residual estrogen receptor (ER)-positive/HER2-negative breast cancer. We also compared the prognostic power of the mEPclin with that of the CPS-EG score. A total of 428 formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tumor samples from GeparTrio and GeparQuattro studies were evaluated for mRNA expression of eight cancer-related and three reference genes. The mEPclin score was computed using a modified algorithm and predefined cut-off values were used to classify each patient at low or high risk. Primary endpoint was disease-free survival (DFS). A higher continuous mEPclin score was significantly associated with increased risk of relapse [HR, 2.16; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.86-2.51; &lt; 0.001] and death (HR, 2.28; 95% CI, 1.90-2.75; &lt; 0.001). Similarly, patients classified at high risk by dichotomous mEPclin showed significantly poorer DFS and overall survival compared with those at low risk. In contrast with CPS-EG, the mEPclin remained significantly prognostic for DFS in multivariate analysis (HR, 2.13; 95% CI, 1.73-2.63; &lt; 0.001). Combining CPS-EG and other clinicopathological variables with mEPclin yielded a significant improvement of the prognostic power for DFS versus without mEPclin (c-indices: 0.748 vs. 0.660; &lt; 0.001). The mEPclin score independently predicted the risk of distance recurrence and provided additional prognostic information to the CPS-EG score to assess more accurately the prognosis after NACT in the luminal non-pCR patient population. Therefore, this approach can be used to select patients for additional post-neoadjuvant therapies. .</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>American Association for Cancer Research Inc</pub><pmid>29618617</pmid><doi>10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-17-2947</doi><tpages>8</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6591-3367</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1078-0432
ispartof Clinical cancer research, 2018-07, Vol.24 (14), p.3358-3365
issn 1078-0432
1557-3265
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2022128012
source MEDLINE; American Association for Cancer Research; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects Adult
Aged
Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols - therapeutic use
Biomarkers, Tumor
Breast cancer
Breast Neoplasms - drug therapy
Breast Neoplasms - etiology
Breast Neoplasms - metabolism
Breast Neoplasms - pathology
Cancer
Chemotherapy
Chemotherapy, Adjuvant
Clinical Trials, Phase III as Topic
Combined Modality Therapy
Confidence intervals
ErbB-2 protein
Estrogen receptors
Estrogens
Experimental design
Female
Gene expression
Gene Expression Profiling
Health risks
Humans
Kaplan-Meier Estimate
Medical prognosis
Middle Aged
Multivariate analysis
Neoadjuvant Therapy
Neoplasm Grading
Neoplasm Staging
Paraffin
Paraffins
Patients
Prognosis
Risk Assessment
Survival
Treatment Outcome
Tumors
title Risk Assessment after Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Luminal Breast Cancer Using a Clinicomolecular Predictor
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-27T22%3A33%3A10IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Risk%20Assessment%20after%20Neoadjuvant%20Chemotherapy%20in%20Luminal%20Breast%20Cancer%20Using%20a%20Clinicomolecular%20Predictor&rft.jtitle=Clinical%20cancer%20research&rft.au=Loibl,%20Sibylle&rft.date=2018-07-15&rft.volume=24&rft.issue=14&rft.spage=3358&rft.epage=3365&rft.pages=3358-3365&rft.issn=1078-0432&rft.eissn=1557-3265&rft_id=info:doi/10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-17-2947&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2022128012%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2070047195&rft_id=info:pmid/29618617&rfr_iscdi=true