Paradoxical choice in rats: Subjective valuation and mechanism of choice

•Rats sacrifice potential rewards by preferring an option that signals outcomes.•Results match the predictions of the Sequential Choice Model (SCM).•Latencies in single-option trials predict preferences in choice trials.•Latencies in choice trials are the same or shorter than in single-option trials...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Behavioural processes 2018-07, Vol.152, p.73-80
Hauptverfasser: Ojeda, Andrés, Murphy, Robin A., Kacelnik, Alex
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 80
container_issue
container_start_page 73
container_title Behavioural processes
container_volume 152
creator Ojeda, Andrés
Murphy, Robin A.
Kacelnik, Alex
description •Rats sacrifice potential rewards by preferring an option that signals outcomes.•Results match the predictions of the Sequential Choice Model (SCM).•Latencies in single-option trials predict preferences in choice trials.•Latencies in choice trials are the same or shorter than in single-option trials. Decision-makers benefit from information only when they can use it to guide behavior. However, recent experiments found that pigeons and starlings value information that they cannot use. Here we show that this paradox is also present in rats, and explore the underlying decision process. Subjects chose between two options that delivered food probabilistically after a fixed delay. In one option (“info”), outcomes (food/no-food) were signaled immediately after choice, whereas in the alternative (“non-info”) the outcome was uncertain until the delay lapsed. Rats sacrificed up to 20% potential rewards by preferring the info option, but reversed preference when the cost was 60%. This reversal contrasts with the results found with pigeons and starlings and may reflect species’ differences worth of further investigation. Results are consistent with predictions of the Sequential Choice Model (SCM), that proposes that choices are driven by the mechanisms that control action in sequential encounters. As expected from the SCM, latencies to respond in single-option trials predicted preferences in choice trials, and latencies in choice trials were the same or shorter than in single-option trials. We argue that the congruence of results in distant vertebrates probably reflects evolved adaptations to shared fundamental challenges in nature, and that the apparently paradoxical overvaluing of information is not sub-optimal as has been claimed, even though its functional significance is not yet understood.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.beproc.2018.03.024
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2021320888</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0376635717306083</els_id><sourcerecordid>2021320888</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c436t-11a203749f9599f8158daf488c61be7b4e70cf36bb930ef825bc6af7edbf54043</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kM1u1TAQRi1ERS-FN0AoEhs2Scc_cRwWSKgCilSplQpry3bGqqMkLnZyBW9fV_fCoouuZnO-b2YOIe8oNBSoPB8bi_cpuoYBVQ3wBph4QXZUdaxWHNRLsgPeyVrytjslr3MeAQoJ8hU5Zb0E1Qu2I5c3Jpkh_gnOTJW7i8FhFZYqmTV_qm43O6Jbwx6rvZk2s4a4VGYZqhndnVlCnqvoj6k35MSbKePb4zwjv759_XlxWV9df_9x8eWqdoLLtabUsHKW6H3f9r1XtFWD8UIpJ6nFzgrswHkure05oFestU4a3-FgfStA8DPy8dBbfv-9YV71HLLDaTILxi1rBoxyBkqpgn54go5xS0u5rlCKK-hEywslDpRLMeeEXt-nMJv0V1PQj6b1qA-m9aNpDVwX0yX2_li-2RmH_6F_agvw-QBgsbEPmHR2AReHQ0hFqh5ieH7DA5tEj_M</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2083807453</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Paradoxical choice in rats: Subjective valuation and mechanism of choice</title><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Ojeda, Andrés ; Murphy, Robin A. ; Kacelnik, Alex</creator><creatorcontrib>Ojeda, Andrés ; Murphy, Robin A. ; Kacelnik, Alex</creatorcontrib><description>•Rats sacrifice potential rewards by preferring an option that signals outcomes.•Results match the predictions of the Sequential Choice Model (SCM).•Latencies in single-option trials predict preferences in choice trials.•Latencies in choice trials are the same or shorter than in single-option trials. Decision-makers benefit from information only when they can use it to guide behavior. However, recent experiments found that pigeons and starlings value information that they cannot use. Here we show that this paradox is also present in rats, and explore the underlying decision process. Subjects chose between two options that delivered food probabilistically after a fixed delay. In one option (“info”), outcomes (food/no-food) were signaled immediately after choice, whereas in the alternative (“non-info”) the outcome was uncertain until the delay lapsed. Rats sacrificed up to 20% potential rewards by preferring the info option, but reversed preference when the cost was 60%. This reversal contrasts with the results found with pigeons and starlings and may reflect species’ differences worth of further investigation. Results are consistent with predictions of the Sequential Choice Model (SCM), that proposes that choices are driven by the mechanisms that control action in sequential encounters. As expected from the SCM, latencies to respond in single-option trials predicted preferences in choice trials, and latencies in choice trials were the same or shorter than in single-option trials. We argue that the congruence of results in distant vertebrates probably reflects evolved adaptations to shared fundamental challenges in nature, and that the apparently paradoxical overvaluing of information is not sub-optimal as has been claimed, even though its functional significance is not yet understood.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0376-6357</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1872-8308</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.beproc.2018.03.024</identifier><identifier>PMID: 29608942</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Netherlands: Elsevier B.V</publisher><subject>Adaptation ; Animal behavior ; Behavior ; Decision making ; Food ; Foraging ; Laboratory animals ; Manipulation ; Personality traits ; Reaction time ; Sequential choice model ; Suboptimal choice</subject><ispartof>Behavioural processes, 2018-07, Vol.152, p.73-80</ispartof><rights>2018 Elsevier B.V.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2018 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.</rights><rights>Copyright Elsevier Science Ltd. Jul 2018</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c436t-11a203749f9599f8158daf488c61be7b4e70cf36bb930ef825bc6af7edbf54043</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c436t-11a203749f9599f8158daf488c61be7b4e70cf36bb930ef825bc6af7edbf54043</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0376635717306083$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3536,27903,27904,65309</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29608942$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Ojeda, Andrés</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Murphy, Robin A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kacelnik, Alex</creatorcontrib><title>Paradoxical choice in rats: Subjective valuation and mechanism of choice</title><title>Behavioural processes</title><addtitle>Behav Processes</addtitle><description>•Rats sacrifice potential rewards by preferring an option that signals outcomes.•Results match the predictions of the Sequential Choice Model (SCM).•Latencies in single-option trials predict preferences in choice trials.•Latencies in choice trials are the same or shorter than in single-option trials. Decision-makers benefit from information only when they can use it to guide behavior. However, recent experiments found that pigeons and starlings value information that they cannot use. Here we show that this paradox is also present in rats, and explore the underlying decision process. Subjects chose between two options that delivered food probabilistically after a fixed delay. In one option (“info”), outcomes (food/no-food) were signaled immediately after choice, whereas in the alternative (“non-info”) the outcome was uncertain until the delay lapsed. Rats sacrificed up to 20% potential rewards by preferring the info option, but reversed preference when the cost was 60%. This reversal contrasts with the results found with pigeons and starlings and may reflect species’ differences worth of further investigation. Results are consistent with predictions of the Sequential Choice Model (SCM), that proposes that choices are driven by the mechanisms that control action in sequential encounters. As expected from the SCM, latencies to respond in single-option trials predicted preferences in choice trials, and latencies in choice trials were the same or shorter than in single-option trials. We argue that the congruence of results in distant vertebrates probably reflects evolved adaptations to shared fundamental challenges in nature, and that the apparently paradoxical overvaluing of information is not sub-optimal as has been claimed, even though its functional significance is not yet understood.</description><subject>Adaptation</subject><subject>Animal behavior</subject><subject>Behavior</subject><subject>Decision making</subject><subject>Food</subject><subject>Foraging</subject><subject>Laboratory animals</subject><subject>Manipulation</subject><subject>Personality traits</subject><subject>Reaction time</subject><subject>Sequential choice model</subject><subject>Suboptimal choice</subject><issn>0376-6357</issn><issn>1872-8308</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kM1u1TAQRi1ERS-FN0AoEhs2Scc_cRwWSKgCilSplQpry3bGqqMkLnZyBW9fV_fCoouuZnO-b2YOIe8oNBSoPB8bi_cpuoYBVQ3wBph4QXZUdaxWHNRLsgPeyVrytjslr3MeAQoJ8hU5Zb0E1Qu2I5c3Jpkh_gnOTJW7i8FhFZYqmTV_qm43O6Jbwx6rvZk2s4a4VGYZqhndnVlCnqvoj6k35MSbKePb4zwjv759_XlxWV9df_9x8eWqdoLLtabUsHKW6H3f9r1XtFWD8UIpJ6nFzgrswHkure05oFestU4a3-FgfStA8DPy8dBbfv-9YV71HLLDaTILxi1rBoxyBkqpgn54go5xS0u5rlCKK-hEywslDpRLMeeEXt-nMJv0V1PQj6b1qA-m9aNpDVwX0yX2_li-2RmH_6F_agvw-QBgsbEPmHR2AReHQ0hFqh5ieH7DA5tEj_M</recordid><startdate>20180701</startdate><enddate>20180701</enddate><creator>Ojeda, Andrés</creator><creator>Murphy, Robin A.</creator><creator>Kacelnik, Alex</creator><general>Elsevier B.V</general><general>Elsevier Science Ltd</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20180701</creationdate><title>Paradoxical choice in rats: Subjective valuation and mechanism of choice</title><author>Ojeda, Andrés ; Murphy, Robin A. ; Kacelnik, Alex</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c436t-11a203749f9599f8158daf488c61be7b4e70cf36bb930ef825bc6af7edbf54043</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Adaptation</topic><topic>Animal behavior</topic><topic>Behavior</topic><topic>Decision making</topic><topic>Food</topic><topic>Foraging</topic><topic>Laboratory animals</topic><topic>Manipulation</topic><topic>Personality traits</topic><topic>Reaction time</topic><topic>Sequential choice model</topic><topic>Suboptimal choice</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Ojeda, Andrés</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Murphy, Robin A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kacelnik, Alex</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Behavioural processes</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Ojeda, Andrés</au><au>Murphy, Robin A.</au><au>Kacelnik, Alex</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Paradoxical choice in rats: Subjective valuation and mechanism of choice</atitle><jtitle>Behavioural processes</jtitle><addtitle>Behav Processes</addtitle><date>2018-07-01</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>152</volume><spage>73</spage><epage>80</epage><pages>73-80</pages><issn>0376-6357</issn><eissn>1872-8308</eissn><abstract>•Rats sacrifice potential rewards by preferring an option that signals outcomes.•Results match the predictions of the Sequential Choice Model (SCM).•Latencies in single-option trials predict preferences in choice trials.•Latencies in choice trials are the same or shorter than in single-option trials. Decision-makers benefit from information only when they can use it to guide behavior. However, recent experiments found that pigeons and starlings value information that they cannot use. Here we show that this paradox is also present in rats, and explore the underlying decision process. Subjects chose between two options that delivered food probabilistically after a fixed delay. In one option (“info”), outcomes (food/no-food) were signaled immediately after choice, whereas in the alternative (“non-info”) the outcome was uncertain until the delay lapsed. Rats sacrificed up to 20% potential rewards by preferring the info option, but reversed preference when the cost was 60%. This reversal contrasts with the results found with pigeons and starlings and may reflect species’ differences worth of further investigation. Results are consistent with predictions of the Sequential Choice Model (SCM), that proposes that choices are driven by the mechanisms that control action in sequential encounters. As expected from the SCM, latencies to respond in single-option trials predicted preferences in choice trials, and latencies in choice trials were the same or shorter than in single-option trials. We argue that the congruence of results in distant vertebrates probably reflects evolved adaptations to shared fundamental challenges in nature, and that the apparently paradoxical overvaluing of information is not sub-optimal as has been claimed, even though its functional significance is not yet understood.</abstract><cop>Netherlands</cop><pub>Elsevier B.V</pub><pmid>29608942</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.beproc.2018.03.024</doi><tpages>8</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0376-6357
ispartof Behavioural processes, 2018-07, Vol.152, p.73-80
issn 0376-6357
1872-8308
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2021320888
source Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals
subjects Adaptation
Animal behavior
Behavior
Decision making
Food
Foraging
Laboratory animals
Manipulation
Personality traits
Reaction time
Sequential choice model
Suboptimal choice
title Paradoxical choice in rats: Subjective valuation and mechanism of choice
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-25T03%3A03%3A10IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Paradoxical%20choice%20in%20rats:%20Subjective%20valuation%20and%20mechanism%20of%20choice&rft.jtitle=Behavioural%20processes&rft.au=Ojeda,%20Andr%C3%A9s&rft.date=2018-07-01&rft.volume=152&rft.spage=73&rft.epage=80&rft.pages=73-80&rft.issn=0376-6357&rft.eissn=1872-8308&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.beproc.2018.03.024&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2021320888%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2083807453&rft_id=info:pmid/29608942&rft_els_id=S0376635717306083&rfr_iscdi=true