Pelvic Artery Calcification Score Is a Marker of Vascular Calcification in Male Hemodialysis Patients

Patients who undergo hemodialysis often suffer from cardiovascular disease (CVD), and evaluation of coronary artery calcification is extremely important. These evaluations are typically conducted using a noninvasive method including electron beam computed tomography (CT) or multi‐detector CT, and th...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Therapeutic apheresis and dialysis 2018-10, Vol.22 (5), p.509-513
Hauptverfasser: Matsuura, Tomohiko, Abe, Takaya, Onoda, Mitsutaka, Ikarashi, Daiki, Sugimura, Jun, Komaki, Toshiaki, Sasaki, Nariyuki, Takasawa, Yumiko, Kato, Tetsuo, Yoshioka, Kunihiro, Ehara, Shigeru, Obara, Wataru
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 513
container_issue 5
container_start_page 509
container_title Therapeutic apheresis and dialysis
container_volume 22
creator Matsuura, Tomohiko
Abe, Takaya
Onoda, Mitsutaka
Ikarashi, Daiki
Sugimura, Jun
Komaki, Toshiaki
Sasaki, Nariyuki
Takasawa, Yumiko
Kato, Tetsuo
Yoshioka, Kunihiro
Ehara, Shigeru
Obara, Wataru
description Patients who undergo hemodialysis often suffer from cardiovascular disease (CVD), and evaluation of coronary artery calcification is extremely important. These evaluations are typically conducted using a noninvasive method including electron beam computed tomography (CT) or multi‐detector CT, and the Agatston method to calculate the coronary artery calcification score (CACS). However, it is difficult to use for patients undergoing dialysis. Because patients undergoing dialysis is too strong in coronary artery calcification, and results become incorrect. Therefore, we were looking for a calcified evaluation place peculiar to a patients undergoing dialysis. We obtained pelvic artery calcification scores (PACS) using a 64‐row multi‐slice CT to assess the presence of calcification within a triangular space bordered by bordered by osseous structure. We used the Agatston method to calculate PACS. We compared male patients undergoing dialysis with male patients with normal renal function. Patients undergoing hemodialysis had a significantly higher incidence of pelvic artery calcification than normal controls (79.7% vs. 5.5%). In the dialysis group, CACS was 1660.2 (0–9056.1), and PACS was 48.8 (0–2943.1). We found a correlation between PACS and CACS and between PACS and dialysis period. We found penile artery calcification in male patients undergoing hemodialysis was more than normal controls, and it was possible to quantify PACS using the Agatston method. This study suggested the possibility that PACS became the vascular calcification evaluation method of the hemodialysis patient.
doi_str_mv 10.1111/1744-9987.12668
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2020486800</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2020486800</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4088-6825224cb6eb8fd3415e59b1dac14b9a3df0d38439cb1c0f3c7eb5b604938d533</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkDFPwzAQRi0EoqUwsyGPLGnt2EmcsaqAViqiEoXVcpyLZHCSYieg_HtSUjqw4OWsu3efTg-ha0qmtH8zmnAepKlIpjSMY3GCxsfO6fGfpCN04f0bIWHIGTtHozCNCYkJHSPYgP00Gs9dA67DC2W1KYxWjakr_KxrB3jlscKPyr2Dw3WBX5XXrVXuD2uqnrGAl1DWuVG288bjTT-DqvGX6KxQ1sPVoU7Qy_3ddrEM1k8Pq8V8HWhOhAhiEUb9iTqLIRNFzjiNIEozmitNeZYqlhckZ4KzVGdUk4LpBLIoiwlPmcgjxibodsjdufqjBd_I0ngN1qoK6tbLkISEi1gQ0qOzAdWu9t5BIXfOlMp1khK5dyv39uTepPxx22_cHMLbrIT8yP_K7IFoAL6Mhe6_PLmdb4bgb6Msg3M</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2020486800</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Pelvic Artery Calcification Score Is a Marker of Vascular Calcification in Male Hemodialysis Patients</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><creator>Matsuura, Tomohiko ; Abe, Takaya ; Onoda, Mitsutaka ; Ikarashi, Daiki ; Sugimura, Jun ; Komaki, Toshiaki ; Sasaki, Nariyuki ; Takasawa, Yumiko ; Kato, Tetsuo ; Yoshioka, Kunihiro ; Ehara, Shigeru ; Obara, Wataru</creator><creatorcontrib>Matsuura, Tomohiko ; Abe, Takaya ; Onoda, Mitsutaka ; Ikarashi, Daiki ; Sugimura, Jun ; Komaki, Toshiaki ; Sasaki, Nariyuki ; Takasawa, Yumiko ; Kato, Tetsuo ; Yoshioka, Kunihiro ; Ehara, Shigeru ; Obara, Wataru</creatorcontrib><description>Patients who undergo hemodialysis often suffer from cardiovascular disease (CVD), and evaluation of coronary artery calcification is extremely important. These evaluations are typically conducted using a noninvasive method including electron beam computed tomography (CT) or multi‐detector CT, and the Agatston method to calculate the coronary artery calcification score (CACS). However, it is difficult to use for patients undergoing dialysis. Because patients undergoing dialysis is too strong in coronary artery calcification, and results become incorrect. Therefore, we were looking for a calcified evaluation place peculiar to a patients undergoing dialysis. We obtained pelvic artery calcification scores (PACS) using a 64‐row multi‐slice CT to assess the presence of calcification within a triangular space bordered by bordered by osseous structure. We used the Agatston method to calculate PACS. We compared male patients undergoing dialysis with male patients with normal renal function. Patients undergoing hemodialysis had a significantly higher incidence of pelvic artery calcification than normal controls (79.7% vs. 5.5%). In the dialysis group, CACS was 1660.2 (0–9056.1), and PACS was 48.8 (0–2943.1). We found a correlation between PACS and CACS and between PACS and dialysis period. We found penile artery calcification in male patients undergoing hemodialysis was more than normal controls, and it was possible to quantify PACS using the Agatston method. This study suggested the possibility that PACS became the vascular calcification evaluation method of the hemodialysis patient.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1744-9979</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1744-9987</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/1744-9987.12668</identifier><identifier>PMID: 29600601</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Kyoto, Japan: John Wiley &amp; Sons Australia, Ltd</publisher><subject>Adult ; Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Calcification ; Cardiovascular disease ; Case-Control Studies ; Coronary artery calcification ; Erectile dysfunction ; Hemodialysis patients ; Humans ; Iliac Artery - diagnostic imaging ; Iliac Artery - pathology ; Incidence ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Multidetector Computed Tomography - methods ; Pelvic artery calcification ; Pelvis - diagnostic imaging ; Renal Dialysis - adverse effects ; Retrospective Studies ; Tomography, X-Ray Computed - methods ; Vascular Calcification - diagnostic imaging ; Vascular Calcification - epidemiology ; Vascular Calcification - etiology</subject><ispartof>Therapeutic apheresis and dialysis, 2018-10, Vol.22 (5), p.509-513</ispartof><rights>2018 International Society for Apheresis, Japanese Society for Apheresis, and Japanese Society for Dialysis Therapy</rights><rights>2018 International Society for Apheresis, Japanese Society for Apheresis, and Japanese Society for Dialysis Therapy.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4088-6825224cb6eb8fd3415e59b1dac14b9a3df0d38439cb1c0f3c7eb5b604938d533</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4088-6825224cb6eb8fd3415e59b1dac14b9a3df0d38439cb1c0f3c7eb5b604938d533</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-5360-1027 ; 0000-0001-9867-8300</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2F1744-9987.12668$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2F1744-9987.12668$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,27902,27903,45552,45553</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29600601$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Matsuura, Tomohiko</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Abe, Takaya</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Onoda, Mitsutaka</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ikarashi, Daiki</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sugimura, Jun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Komaki, Toshiaki</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sasaki, Nariyuki</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Takasawa, Yumiko</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kato, Tetsuo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yoshioka, Kunihiro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ehara, Shigeru</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Obara, Wataru</creatorcontrib><title>Pelvic Artery Calcification Score Is a Marker of Vascular Calcification in Male Hemodialysis Patients</title><title>Therapeutic apheresis and dialysis</title><addtitle>Ther Apher Dial</addtitle><description>Patients who undergo hemodialysis often suffer from cardiovascular disease (CVD), and evaluation of coronary artery calcification is extremely important. These evaluations are typically conducted using a noninvasive method including electron beam computed tomography (CT) or multi‐detector CT, and the Agatston method to calculate the coronary artery calcification score (CACS). However, it is difficult to use for patients undergoing dialysis. Because patients undergoing dialysis is too strong in coronary artery calcification, and results become incorrect. Therefore, we were looking for a calcified evaluation place peculiar to a patients undergoing dialysis. We obtained pelvic artery calcification scores (PACS) using a 64‐row multi‐slice CT to assess the presence of calcification within a triangular space bordered by bordered by osseous structure. We used the Agatston method to calculate PACS. We compared male patients undergoing dialysis with male patients with normal renal function. Patients undergoing hemodialysis had a significantly higher incidence of pelvic artery calcification than normal controls (79.7% vs. 5.5%). In the dialysis group, CACS was 1660.2 (0–9056.1), and PACS was 48.8 (0–2943.1). We found a correlation between PACS and CACS and between PACS and dialysis period. We found penile artery calcification in male patients undergoing hemodialysis was more than normal controls, and it was possible to quantify PACS using the Agatston method. This study suggested the possibility that PACS became the vascular calcification evaluation method of the hemodialysis patient.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Aged, 80 and over</subject><subject>Calcification</subject><subject>Cardiovascular disease</subject><subject>Case-Control Studies</subject><subject>Coronary artery calcification</subject><subject>Erectile dysfunction</subject><subject>Hemodialysis patients</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Iliac Artery - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Iliac Artery - pathology</subject><subject>Incidence</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Multidetector Computed Tomography - methods</subject><subject>Pelvic artery calcification</subject><subject>Pelvis - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Renal Dialysis - adverse effects</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><subject>Tomography, X-Ray Computed - methods</subject><subject>Vascular Calcification - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Vascular Calcification - epidemiology</subject><subject>Vascular Calcification - etiology</subject><issn>1744-9979</issn><issn>1744-9987</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkDFPwzAQRi0EoqUwsyGPLGnt2EmcsaqAViqiEoXVcpyLZHCSYieg_HtSUjqw4OWsu3efTg-ha0qmtH8zmnAepKlIpjSMY3GCxsfO6fGfpCN04f0bIWHIGTtHozCNCYkJHSPYgP00Gs9dA67DC2W1KYxWjakr_KxrB3jlscKPyr2Dw3WBX5XXrVXuD2uqnrGAl1DWuVG288bjTT-DqvGX6KxQ1sPVoU7Qy_3ddrEM1k8Pq8V8HWhOhAhiEUb9iTqLIRNFzjiNIEozmitNeZYqlhckZ4KzVGdUk4LpBLIoiwlPmcgjxibodsjdufqjBd_I0ngN1qoK6tbLkISEi1gQ0qOzAdWu9t5BIXfOlMp1khK5dyv39uTepPxx22_cHMLbrIT8yP_K7IFoAL6Mhe6_PLmdb4bgb6Msg3M</recordid><startdate>201810</startdate><enddate>201810</enddate><creator>Matsuura, Tomohiko</creator><creator>Abe, Takaya</creator><creator>Onoda, Mitsutaka</creator><creator>Ikarashi, Daiki</creator><creator>Sugimura, Jun</creator><creator>Komaki, Toshiaki</creator><creator>Sasaki, Nariyuki</creator><creator>Takasawa, Yumiko</creator><creator>Kato, Tetsuo</creator><creator>Yoshioka, Kunihiro</creator><creator>Ehara, Shigeru</creator><creator>Obara, Wataru</creator><general>John Wiley &amp; Sons Australia, Ltd</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5360-1027</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9867-8300</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>201810</creationdate><title>Pelvic Artery Calcification Score Is a Marker of Vascular Calcification in Male Hemodialysis Patients</title><author>Matsuura, Tomohiko ; Abe, Takaya ; Onoda, Mitsutaka ; Ikarashi, Daiki ; Sugimura, Jun ; Komaki, Toshiaki ; Sasaki, Nariyuki ; Takasawa, Yumiko ; Kato, Tetsuo ; Yoshioka, Kunihiro ; Ehara, Shigeru ; Obara, Wataru</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4088-6825224cb6eb8fd3415e59b1dac14b9a3df0d38439cb1c0f3c7eb5b604938d533</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Aged, 80 and over</topic><topic>Calcification</topic><topic>Cardiovascular disease</topic><topic>Case-Control Studies</topic><topic>Coronary artery calcification</topic><topic>Erectile dysfunction</topic><topic>Hemodialysis patients</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Iliac Artery - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Iliac Artery - pathology</topic><topic>Incidence</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Multidetector Computed Tomography - methods</topic><topic>Pelvic artery calcification</topic><topic>Pelvis - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Renal Dialysis - adverse effects</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><topic>Tomography, X-Ray Computed - methods</topic><topic>Vascular Calcification - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Vascular Calcification - epidemiology</topic><topic>Vascular Calcification - etiology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Matsuura, Tomohiko</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Abe, Takaya</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Onoda, Mitsutaka</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ikarashi, Daiki</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sugimura, Jun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Komaki, Toshiaki</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sasaki, Nariyuki</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Takasawa, Yumiko</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kato, Tetsuo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yoshioka, Kunihiro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ehara, Shigeru</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Obara, Wataru</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Therapeutic apheresis and dialysis</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Matsuura, Tomohiko</au><au>Abe, Takaya</au><au>Onoda, Mitsutaka</au><au>Ikarashi, Daiki</au><au>Sugimura, Jun</au><au>Komaki, Toshiaki</au><au>Sasaki, Nariyuki</au><au>Takasawa, Yumiko</au><au>Kato, Tetsuo</au><au>Yoshioka, Kunihiro</au><au>Ehara, Shigeru</au><au>Obara, Wataru</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Pelvic Artery Calcification Score Is a Marker of Vascular Calcification in Male Hemodialysis Patients</atitle><jtitle>Therapeutic apheresis and dialysis</jtitle><addtitle>Ther Apher Dial</addtitle><date>2018-10</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>22</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>509</spage><epage>513</epage><pages>509-513</pages><issn>1744-9979</issn><eissn>1744-9987</eissn><abstract>Patients who undergo hemodialysis often suffer from cardiovascular disease (CVD), and evaluation of coronary artery calcification is extremely important. These evaluations are typically conducted using a noninvasive method including electron beam computed tomography (CT) or multi‐detector CT, and the Agatston method to calculate the coronary artery calcification score (CACS). However, it is difficult to use for patients undergoing dialysis. Because patients undergoing dialysis is too strong in coronary artery calcification, and results become incorrect. Therefore, we were looking for a calcified evaluation place peculiar to a patients undergoing dialysis. We obtained pelvic artery calcification scores (PACS) using a 64‐row multi‐slice CT to assess the presence of calcification within a triangular space bordered by bordered by osseous structure. We used the Agatston method to calculate PACS. We compared male patients undergoing dialysis with male patients with normal renal function. Patients undergoing hemodialysis had a significantly higher incidence of pelvic artery calcification than normal controls (79.7% vs. 5.5%). In the dialysis group, CACS was 1660.2 (0–9056.1), and PACS was 48.8 (0–2943.1). We found a correlation between PACS and CACS and between PACS and dialysis period. We found penile artery calcification in male patients undergoing hemodialysis was more than normal controls, and it was possible to quantify PACS using the Agatston method. This study suggested the possibility that PACS became the vascular calcification evaluation method of the hemodialysis patient.</abstract><cop>Kyoto, Japan</cop><pub>John Wiley &amp; Sons Australia, Ltd</pub><pmid>29600601</pmid><doi>10.1111/1744-9987.12668</doi><tpages>5</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5360-1027</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9867-8300</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1744-9979
ispartof Therapeutic apheresis and dialysis, 2018-10, Vol.22 (5), p.509-513
issn 1744-9979
1744-9987
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2020486800
source MEDLINE; Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete
subjects Adult
Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Calcification
Cardiovascular disease
Case-Control Studies
Coronary artery calcification
Erectile dysfunction
Hemodialysis patients
Humans
Iliac Artery - diagnostic imaging
Iliac Artery - pathology
Incidence
Male
Middle Aged
Multidetector Computed Tomography - methods
Pelvic artery calcification
Pelvis - diagnostic imaging
Renal Dialysis - adverse effects
Retrospective Studies
Tomography, X-Ray Computed - methods
Vascular Calcification - diagnostic imaging
Vascular Calcification - epidemiology
Vascular Calcification - etiology
title Pelvic Artery Calcification Score Is a Marker of Vascular Calcification in Male Hemodialysis Patients
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-27T09%3A20%3A47IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Pelvic%20Artery%20Calcification%20Score%20Is%20a%20Marker%20of%20Vascular%20Calcification%20in%20Male%20Hemodialysis%20Patients&rft.jtitle=Therapeutic%20apheresis%20and%20dialysis&rft.au=Matsuura,%20Tomohiko&rft.date=2018-10&rft.volume=22&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=509&rft.epage=513&rft.pages=509-513&rft.issn=1744-9979&rft.eissn=1744-9987&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/1744-9987.12668&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2020486800%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2020486800&rft_id=info:pmid/29600601&rfr_iscdi=true