Estimates of Tibial Shock Magnitude in Men and Women at the Start and End of a Military Drill Training Program

Foot drill is a key component of military training and is characterized by frequent heel stamping, likely resulting in high tibial shock magnitudes. Higher tibial shock during running has previously been associated with risk of lower limb stress fractures, which are prevalent among military populati...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Military medicine 2018-09, Vol.183 (9-10), p.e392-e398
Hauptverfasser: Rice, Hannah M, Saunders, Samantha C, McGuire, Stephen J, O'Leary, Thomas J, Izard, Rachel M
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page e398
container_issue 9-10
container_start_page e392
container_title Military medicine
container_volume 183
creator Rice, Hannah M
Saunders, Samantha C
McGuire, Stephen J
O'Leary, Thomas J
Izard, Rachel M
description Foot drill is a key component of military training and is characterized by frequent heel stamping, likely resulting in high tibial shock magnitudes. Higher tibial shock during running has previously been associated with risk of lower limb stress fractures, which are prevalent among military populations. Quantification of tibial shock during drill training is, therefore, warranted. This study aimed to provide estimates of tibial shock during military drill in British Army Basic training. The study also aimed to compare values between men and women, and to identify any differences between the first and final sessions of training. Tibial accelerometers were secured on the right medial, distal shank of 10 British Army recruits (n = 5 men; n = 5 women) throughout a scheduled drill training session in week 1 and week 12 of basic military training. Peak positive accelerations, the average magnitude above given thresholds, and the rate at which each threshold was exceeded were quantified. Mean (SD) peak positive acceleration was 20.8 (2.2) g across all sessions, which is considerably higher than values typically observed during high impact physical activity. Magnitudes of tibial shock were higher in men than women, and higher in week 12 compared with week 1 of training. This study provides the first estimates of tibial shock magnitude during military drill training in the field. The high values suggest that military drill is a demanding activity and this should be considered when developing and evaluating military training programs. Further exploration is required to understand the response of the lower limb to military drill training and the etiology of these responses in the development of lower limb stress fractures.
doi_str_mv 10.1093/milmed/usy037
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2019813293</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2168971031</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c388t-2879c8494dfe6e5ba3093cede29cf1f9ea437d846414ddb8ee4a69c6de8e055a3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kT1PwzAQhi0EoqUwsiJLLCyhduwk9ohK-ZCoQKIItsiNL8UlcYrtDP33uBQWBobTnV49d7q7F6FTSi4pkWzcmqYFPe79hrBiDw2pZCTJKXvbR0NC0jzhpMgG6Mj7FSGUS0EP0SCVmSQ8y4bITn0wrQrgcVfjuVkY1eDn9676wDO1tCb0GrCxeAYWK6vxa9duq4DDO-DnoFz4lqcxYr_CM9OYqG7wtTNNg-dOGWvsEj-5bulUe4wOatV4OPnJI_RyM51P7pKHx9v7ydVDUjEhQpKKQlaCS65ryCFbKBZPrUBDKqua1hIUZ4UWPOeUa70QAFzlsso1CCBZptgIXezmrl332YMPZWt8BU2jLHS9L1NC4ydYKllEz_-gq653Nm5XppwRIoWM-T-K5kIWlDAaqWRHVa7z3kFdrl38rtuUlJRbu8qdXeXOrsif_UztF1v5l_71h30BEaCRbQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2168971031</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Estimates of Tibial Shock Magnitude in Men and Women at the Start and End of a Military Drill Training Program</title><source>Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current)</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><creator>Rice, Hannah M ; Saunders, Samantha C ; McGuire, Stephen J ; O'Leary, Thomas J ; Izard, Rachel M</creator><creatorcontrib>Rice, Hannah M ; Saunders, Samantha C ; McGuire, Stephen J ; O'Leary, Thomas J ; Izard, Rachel M</creatorcontrib><description>Foot drill is a key component of military training and is characterized by frequent heel stamping, likely resulting in high tibial shock magnitudes. Higher tibial shock during running has previously been associated with risk of lower limb stress fractures, which are prevalent among military populations. Quantification of tibial shock during drill training is, therefore, warranted. This study aimed to provide estimates of tibial shock during military drill in British Army Basic training. The study also aimed to compare values between men and women, and to identify any differences between the first and final sessions of training. Tibial accelerometers were secured on the right medial, distal shank of 10 British Army recruits (n = 5 men; n = 5 women) throughout a scheduled drill training session in week 1 and week 12 of basic military training. Peak positive accelerations, the average magnitude above given thresholds, and the rate at which each threshold was exceeded were quantified. Mean (SD) peak positive acceleration was 20.8 (2.2) g across all sessions, which is considerably higher than values typically observed during high impact physical activity. Magnitudes of tibial shock were higher in men than women, and higher in week 12 compared with week 1 of training. This study provides the first estimates of tibial shock magnitude during military drill training in the field. The high values suggest that military drill is a demanding activity and this should be considered when developing and evaluating military training programs. Further exploration is required to understand the response of the lower limb to military drill training and the etiology of these responses in the development of lower limb stress fractures.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0026-4075</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1930-613X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1093/milmed/usy037</identifier><identifier>PMID: 29590455</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Oxford University Press</publisher><subject>Accelerometers ; Estimates ; Females ; Fractures ; Gender differences ; Injuries ; Males ; Military training ; Shear strength ; Shear tests ; Studies ; Women</subject><ispartof>Military medicine, 2018-09, Vol.183 (9-10), p.e392-e398</ispartof><rights>Association of Military Surgeons of the United States 2018. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.</rights><rights>Copyright Oxford University Press Sep/Oct 2018</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c388t-2879c8494dfe6e5ba3093cede29cf1f9ea437d846414ddb8ee4a69c6de8e055a3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c388t-2879c8494dfe6e5ba3093cede29cf1f9ea437d846414ddb8ee4a69c6de8e055a3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29590455$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Rice, Hannah M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Saunders, Samantha C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McGuire, Stephen J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>O'Leary, Thomas J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Izard, Rachel M</creatorcontrib><title>Estimates of Tibial Shock Magnitude in Men and Women at the Start and End of a Military Drill Training Program</title><title>Military medicine</title><addtitle>Mil Med</addtitle><description>Foot drill is a key component of military training and is characterized by frequent heel stamping, likely resulting in high tibial shock magnitudes. Higher tibial shock during running has previously been associated with risk of lower limb stress fractures, which are prevalent among military populations. Quantification of tibial shock during drill training is, therefore, warranted. This study aimed to provide estimates of tibial shock during military drill in British Army Basic training. The study also aimed to compare values between men and women, and to identify any differences between the first and final sessions of training. Tibial accelerometers were secured on the right medial, distal shank of 10 British Army recruits (n = 5 men; n = 5 women) throughout a scheduled drill training session in week 1 and week 12 of basic military training. Peak positive accelerations, the average magnitude above given thresholds, and the rate at which each threshold was exceeded were quantified. Mean (SD) peak positive acceleration was 20.8 (2.2) g across all sessions, which is considerably higher than values typically observed during high impact physical activity. Magnitudes of tibial shock were higher in men than women, and higher in week 12 compared with week 1 of training. This study provides the first estimates of tibial shock magnitude during military drill training in the field. The high values suggest that military drill is a demanding activity and this should be considered when developing and evaluating military training programs. Further exploration is required to understand the response of the lower limb to military drill training and the etiology of these responses in the development of lower limb stress fractures.</description><subject>Accelerometers</subject><subject>Estimates</subject><subject>Females</subject><subject>Fractures</subject><subject>Gender differences</subject><subject>Injuries</subject><subject>Males</subject><subject>Military training</subject><subject>Shear strength</subject><subject>Shear tests</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Women</subject><issn>0026-4075</issn><issn>1930-613X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kT1PwzAQhi0EoqUwsiJLLCyhduwk9ohK-ZCoQKIItsiNL8UlcYrtDP33uBQWBobTnV49d7q7F6FTSi4pkWzcmqYFPe79hrBiDw2pZCTJKXvbR0NC0jzhpMgG6Mj7FSGUS0EP0SCVmSQ8y4bITn0wrQrgcVfjuVkY1eDn9676wDO1tCb0GrCxeAYWK6vxa9duq4DDO-DnoFz4lqcxYr_CM9OYqG7wtTNNg-dOGWvsEj-5bulUe4wOatV4OPnJI_RyM51P7pKHx9v7ydVDUjEhQpKKQlaCS65ryCFbKBZPrUBDKqua1hIUZ4UWPOeUa70QAFzlsso1CCBZptgIXezmrl332YMPZWt8BU2jLHS9L1NC4ydYKllEz_-gq653Nm5XppwRIoWM-T-K5kIWlDAaqWRHVa7z3kFdrl38rtuUlJRbu8qdXeXOrsif_UztF1v5l_71h30BEaCRbQ</recordid><startdate>20180901</startdate><enddate>20180901</enddate><creator>Rice, Hannah M</creator><creator>Saunders, Samantha C</creator><creator>McGuire, Stephen J</creator><creator>O'Leary, Thomas J</creator><creator>Izard, Rachel M</creator><general>Oxford University Press</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>4T-</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20180901</creationdate><title>Estimates of Tibial Shock Magnitude in Men and Women at the Start and End of a Military Drill Training Program</title><author>Rice, Hannah M ; Saunders, Samantha C ; McGuire, Stephen J ; O'Leary, Thomas J ; Izard, Rachel M</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c388t-2879c8494dfe6e5ba3093cede29cf1f9ea437d846414ddb8ee4a69c6de8e055a3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Accelerometers</topic><topic>Estimates</topic><topic>Females</topic><topic>Fractures</topic><topic>Gender differences</topic><topic>Injuries</topic><topic>Males</topic><topic>Military training</topic><topic>Shear strength</topic><topic>Shear tests</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Women</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Rice, Hannah M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Saunders, Samantha C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McGuire, Stephen J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>O'Leary, Thomas J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Izard, Rachel M</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Docstoc</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Military medicine</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Rice, Hannah M</au><au>Saunders, Samantha C</au><au>McGuire, Stephen J</au><au>O'Leary, Thomas J</au><au>Izard, Rachel M</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Estimates of Tibial Shock Magnitude in Men and Women at the Start and End of a Military Drill Training Program</atitle><jtitle>Military medicine</jtitle><addtitle>Mil Med</addtitle><date>2018-09-01</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>183</volume><issue>9-10</issue><spage>e392</spage><epage>e398</epage><pages>e392-e398</pages><issn>0026-4075</issn><eissn>1930-613X</eissn><abstract>Foot drill is a key component of military training and is characterized by frequent heel stamping, likely resulting in high tibial shock magnitudes. Higher tibial shock during running has previously been associated with risk of lower limb stress fractures, which are prevalent among military populations. Quantification of tibial shock during drill training is, therefore, warranted. This study aimed to provide estimates of tibial shock during military drill in British Army Basic training. The study also aimed to compare values between men and women, and to identify any differences between the first and final sessions of training. Tibial accelerometers were secured on the right medial, distal shank of 10 British Army recruits (n = 5 men; n = 5 women) throughout a scheduled drill training session in week 1 and week 12 of basic military training. Peak positive accelerations, the average magnitude above given thresholds, and the rate at which each threshold was exceeded were quantified. Mean (SD) peak positive acceleration was 20.8 (2.2) g across all sessions, which is considerably higher than values typically observed during high impact physical activity. Magnitudes of tibial shock were higher in men than women, and higher in week 12 compared with week 1 of training. This study provides the first estimates of tibial shock magnitude during military drill training in the field. The high values suggest that military drill is a demanding activity and this should be considered when developing and evaluating military training programs. Further exploration is required to understand the response of the lower limb to military drill training and the etiology of these responses in the development of lower limb stress fractures.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Oxford University Press</pub><pmid>29590455</pmid><doi>10.1093/milmed/usy037</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0026-4075
ispartof Military medicine, 2018-09, Vol.183 (9-10), p.e392-e398
issn 0026-4075
1930-613X
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2019813293
source Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current); EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals
subjects Accelerometers
Estimates
Females
Fractures
Gender differences
Injuries
Males
Military training
Shear strength
Shear tests
Studies
Women
title Estimates of Tibial Shock Magnitude in Men and Women at the Start and End of a Military Drill Training Program
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-21T12%3A08%3A57IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Estimates%20of%20Tibial%20Shock%20Magnitude%20in%20Men%20and%20Women%20at%20the%20Start%20and%20End%20of%20a%20Military%20Drill%20Training%20Program&rft.jtitle=Military%20medicine&rft.au=Rice,%20Hannah%20M&rft.date=2018-09-01&rft.volume=183&rft.issue=9-10&rft.spage=e392&rft.epage=e398&rft.pages=e392-e398&rft.issn=0026-4075&rft.eissn=1930-613X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1093/milmed/usy037&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2168971031%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2168971031&rft_id=info:pmid/29590455&rfr_iscdi=true