Fish Community Structure and Diet Responses to Newbury Weirs in a Low-Gradient River
Restoration projects are often implemented to address specific issues in the environment. Consequences of a restoration project, if any are measured, typically focus on direct changes to the projects focus. However, changing habitat structure likely results in changes to the environment that affect...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Environmental management (New York) 2018-06, Vol.61 (6), p.928-938 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 938 |
---|---|
container_issue | 6 |
container_start_page | 928 |
container_title | Environmental management (New York) |
container_volume | 61 |
creator | Bonjour, Sophia M. Rantala, Heidi M. Bennett, Micah G. Whiles, Matt R. |
description | Restoration projects are often implemented to address specific issues in the environment. Consequences of a restoration project, if any are measured, typically focus on direct changes to the projects focus. However, changing habitat structure likely results in changes to the environment that affect the communities living there. Rock weirs have been used for channel stabilization in many midwestern rivers. Previous research in a southern Illinois river found that weirs benefitted aquatic macroinvertebrate and riparian bird communities by enhancing habitat heterogeneity and insect emergence production. We hypothesized that fishes would also benefit from weirs through enhanced habitat and food availability. We collected fishes in the Cache River in southern Illinois using hand nets, seines, and electroshocking at sites where weirs had been installed and at non-weir sites. Gut contents were identified and individual food items measured. Fish species richness, but not diversity, was higher at weir sites. Fish communities also differed between site types, with benthic feeders characterizing weir sites. Gut content biomass and abundance differed among fish guilds but not between weir and non-weir sites. Fishes from both site types selected for prey taxa predominately found at weirs. Differences between site types were not always captured by univariate metrics, but connecting fish prey to habitat suggests a reach-scale benefit for fishes through increased abundance of favored prey and enhanced prey diversity. Additionally, given the paucity of rocky substrata in the river as a whole, rock weirs enhance fish species richness by providing habitat for less common benthic species. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s00267-018-1022-9 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2019475881</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2019475881</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c324t-fe6c5e712a91cd45a94432c83713018d29c53905d0e9f8ab01c9399c19c0f7e23</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kE1LAzEQhoMoWqs_wIsEvHhZnSS73eQoVatQFPxAbyHNzmpKd7cmu5b-e1PrBwiehmGe952Zl5ADBicMID8NAHyQJ8BkwoDzRG2QHksFjx2oTdIDMUgTlvHnHbIbwhQAhJTZNtnhKpOKCdUjD5cuvNJhU1Vd7dolvW99Z9vOIzV1Qc8dtvQOw7ypAwbaNvQGF5POL-kTOh-oq6mh42aRjLwpHNYRdu_o98hWaWYB979qnzxeXjwMr5Lx7eh6eDZOrOBpm5Q4sBnmjBvFbJFmRqXxeCtFzkT8qeDKZkJBVgCqUpoJMKuEUpYpC2WOXPTJ8dp37pu3DkOrKxcszmamxqYLmgNTaZ5JySJ69AedNp2v43UrSso8H3xSbE1Z34TgsdRz7yrjl5qBXkWu15HrKNGryLWKmsMv525SYfGj-M44AnwNhDiqX9D_rv7f9QPj_on5</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2018877681</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Fish Community Structure and Diet Responses to Newbury Weirs in a Low-Gradient River</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>SpringerNature Journals</source><creator>Bonjour, Sophia M. ; Rantala, Heidi M. ; Bennett, Micah G. ; Whiles, Matt R.</creator><creatorcontrib>Bonjour, Sophia M. ; Rantala, Heidi M. ; Bennett, Micah G. ; Whiles, Matt R.</creatorcontrib><description>Restoration projects are often implemented to address specific issues in the environment. Consequences of a restoration project, if any are measured, typically focus on direct changes to the projects focus. However, changing habitat structure likely results in changes to the environment that affect the communities living there. Rock weirs have been used for channel stabilization in many midwestern rivers. Previous research in a southern Illinois river found that weirs benefitted aquatic macroinvertebrate and riparian bird communities by enhancing habitat heterogeneity and insect emergence production. We hypothesized that fishes would also benefit from weirs through enhanced habitat and food availability. We collected fishes in the Cache River in southern Illinois using hand nets, seines, and electroshocking at sites where weirs had been installed and at non-weir sites. Gut contents were identified and individual food items measured. Fish species richness, but not diversity, was higher at weir sites. Fish communities also differed between site types, with benthic feeders characterizing weir sites. Gut content biomass and abundance differed among fish guilds but not between weir and non-weir sites. Fishes from both site types selected for prey taxa predominately found at weirs. Differences between site types were not always captured by univariate metrics, but connecting fish prey to habitat suggests a reach-scale benefit for fishes through increased abundance of favored prey and enhanced prey diversity. Additionally, given the paucity of rocky substrata in the river as a whole, rock weirs enhance fish species richness by providing habitat for less common benthic species.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0364-152X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1432-1009</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s00267-018-1022-9</identifier><identifier>PMID: 29589139</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York: Springer US</publisher><subject>Abundance ; Animals ; Aquatic Pollution ; Atmospheric Protection/Air Quality Control/Air Pollution ; Biodiversity ; Biomass ; Communities ; Community structure ; Diet ; Earth and Environmental Science ; Ecology ; Ecosystem ; Environment ; Environmental Management ; Environmental restoration ; Feeders ; Fish ; Fishes - classification ; Fishes - growth & development ; Food availability ; Forestry Management ; Habitat changes ; Habitats ; Heterogeneity ; Illinois ; Macroinvertebrates ; Nature Conservation ; Prey ; Restoration ; Rivers ; Rivers - chemistry ; Rocks ; Seines ; Species diversity ; Species richness ; Waste Water Technology ; Water Management ; Water Movements ; Water Pollution Control ; Weirs</subject><ispartof>Environmental management (New York), 2018-06, Vol.61 (6), p.928-938</ispartof><rights>Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2018</rights><rights>Environmental Management is a copyright of Springer, (2018). All Rights Reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c324t-fe6c5e712a91cd45a94432c83713018d29c53905d0e9f8ab01c9399c19c0f7e23</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-3614-7023</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s00267-018-1022-9$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s00267-018-1022-9$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>315,782,786,27931,27932,41495,42564,51326</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29589139$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Bonjour, Sophia M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rantala, Heidi M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bennett, Micah G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Whiles, Matt R.</creatorcontrib><title>Fish Community Structure and Diet Responses to Newbury Weirs in a Low-Gradient River</title><title>Environmental management (New York)</title><addtitle>Environmental Management</addtitle><addtitle>Environ Manage</addtitle><description>Restoration projects are often implemented to address specific issues in the environment. Consequences of a restoration project, if any are measured, typically focus on direct changes to the projects focus. However, changing habitat structure likely results in changes to the environment that affect the communities living there. Rock weirs have been used for channel stabilization in many midwestern rivers. Previous research in a southern Illinois river found that weirs benefitted aquatic macroinvertebrate and riparian bird communities by enhancing habitat heterogeneity and insect emergence production. We hypothesized that fishes would also benefit from weirs through enhanced habitat and food availability. We collected fishes in the Cache River in southern Illinois using hand nets, seines, and electroshocking at sites where weirs had been installed and at non-weir sites. Gut contents were identified and individual food items measured. Fish species richness, but not diversity, was higher at weir sites. Fish communities also differed between site types, with benthic feeders characterizing weir sites. Gut content biomass and abundance differed among fish guilds but not between weir and non-weir sites. Fishes from both site types selected for prey taxa predominately found at weirs. Differences between site types were not always captured by univariate metrics, but connecting fish prey to habitat suggests a reach-scale benefit for fishes through increased abundance of favored prey and enhanced prey diversity. Additionally, given the paucity of rocky substrata in the river as a whole, rock weirs enhance fish species richness by providing habitat for less common benthic species.</description><subject>Abundance</subject><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Aquatic Pollution</subject><subject>Atmospheric Protection/Air Quality Control/Air Pollution</subject><subject>Biodiversity</subject><subject>Biomass</subject><subject>Communities</subject><subject>Community structure</subject><subject>Diet</subject><subject>Earth and Environmental Science</subject><subject>Ecology</subject><subject>Ecosystem</subject><subject>Environment</subject><subject>Environmental Management</subject><subject>Environmental restoration</subject><subject>Feeders</subject><subject>Fish</subject><subject>Fishes - classification</subject><subject>Fishes - growth & development</subject><subject>Food availability</subject><subject>Forestry Management</subject><subject>Habitat changes</subject><subject>Habitats</subject><subject>Heterogeneity</subject><subject>Illinois</subject><subject>Macroinvertebrates</subject><subject>Nature Conservation</subject><subject>Prey</subject><subject>Restoration</subject><subject>Rivers</subject><subject>Rivers - chemistry</subject><subject>Rocks</subject><subject>Seines</subject><subject>Species diversity</subject><subject>Species richness</subject><subject>Waste Water Technology</subject><subject>Water Management</subject><subject>Water Movements</subject><subject>Water Pollution Control</subject><subject>Weirs</subject><issn>0364-152X</issn><issn>1432-1009</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kE1LAzEQhoMoWqs_wIsEvHhZnSS73eQoVatQFPxAbyHNzmpKd7cmu5b-e1PrBwiehmGe952Zl5ADBicMID8NAHyQJ8BkwoDzRG2QHksFjx2oTdIDMUgTlvHnHbIbwhQAhJTZNtnhKpOKCdUjD5cuvNJhU1Vd7dolvW99Z9vOIzV1Qc8dtvQOw7ypAwbaNvQGF5POL-kTOh-oq6mh42aRjLwpHNYRdu_o98hWaWYB979qnzxeXjwMr5Lx7eh6eDZOrOBpm5Q4sBnmjBvFbJFmRqXxeCtFzkT8qeDKZkJBVgCqUpoJMKuEUpYpC2WOXPTJ8dp37pu3DkOrKxcszmamxqYLmgNTaZ5JySJ69AedNp2v43UrSso8H3xSbE1Z34TgsdRz7yrjl5qBXkWu15HrKNGryLWKmsMv525SYfGj-M44AnwNhDiqX9D_rv7f9QPj_on5</recordid><startdate>20180601</startdate><enddate>20180601</enddate><creator>Bonjour, Sophia M.</creator><creator>Rantala, Heidi M.</creator><creator>Bennett, Micah G.</creator><creator>Whiles, Matt R.</creator><general>Springer US</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>87Z</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>SOI</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3614-7023</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20180601</creationdate><title>Fish Community Structure and Diet Responses to Newbury Weirs in a Low-Gradient River</title><author>Bonjour, Sophia M. ; Rantala, Heidi M. ; Bennett, Micah G. ; Whiles, Matt R.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c324t-fe6c5e712a91cd45a94432c83713018d29c53905d0e9f8ab01c9399c19c0f7e23</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Abundance</topic><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Aquatic Pollution</topic><topic>Atmospheric Protection/Air Quality Control/Air Pollution</topic><topic>Biodiversity</topic><topic>Biomass</topic><topic>Communities</topic><topic>Community structure</topic><topic>Diet</topic><topic>Earth and Environmental Science</topic><topic>Ecology</topic><topic>Ecosystem</topic><topic>Environment</topic><topic>Environmental Management</topic><topic>Environmental restoration</topic><topic>Feeders</topic><topic>Fish</topic><topic>Fishes - classification</topic><topic>Fishes - growth & development</topic><topic>Food availability</topic><topic>Forestry Management</topic><topic>Habitat changes</topic><topic>Habitats</topic><topic>Heterogeneity</topic><topic>Illinois</topic><topic>Macroinvertebrates</topic><topic>Nature Conservation</topic><topic>Prey</topic><topic>Restoration</topic><topic>Rivers</topic><topic>Rivers - chemistry</topic><topic>Rocks</topic><topic>Seines</topic><topic>Species diversity</topic><topic>Species richness</topic><topic>Waste Water Technology</topic><topic>Water Management</topic><topic>Water Movements</topic><topic>Water Pollution Control</topic><topic>Weirs</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Bonjour, Sophia M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rantala, Heidi M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bennett, Micah G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Whiles, Matt R.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Access via ABI/INFORM (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Environmental management (New York)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Bonjour, Sophia M.</au><au>Rantala, Heidi M.</au><au>Bennett, Micah G.</au><au>Whiles, Matt R.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Fish Community Structure and Diet Responses to Newbury Weirs in a Low-Gradient River</atitle><jtitle>Environmental management (New York)</jtitle><stitle>Environmental Management</stitle><addtitle>Environ Manage</addtitle><date>2018-06-01</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>61</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>928</spage><epage>938</epage><pages>928-938</pages><issn>0364-152X</issn><eissn>1432-1009</eissn><abstract>Restoration projects are often implemented to address specific issues in the environment. Consequences of a restoration project, if any are measured, typically focus on direct changes to the projects focus. However, changing habitat structure likely results in changes to the environment that affect the communities living there. Rock weirs have been used for channel stabilization in many midwestern rivers. Previous research in a southern Illinois river found that weirs benefitted aquatic macroinvertebrate and riparian bird communities by enhancing habitat heterogeneity and insect emergence production. We hypothesized that fishes would also benefit from weirs through enhanced habitat and food availability. We collected fishes in the Cache River in southern Illinois using hand nets, seines, and electroshocking at sites where weirs had been installed and at non-weir sites. Gut contents were identified and individual food items measured. Fish species richness, but not diversity, was higher at weir sites. Fish communities also differed between site types, with benthic feeders characterizing weir sites. Gut content biomass and abundance differed among fish guilds but not between weir and non-weir sites. Fishes from both site types selected for prey taxa predominately found at weirs. Differences between site types were not always captured by univariate metrics, but connecting fish prey to habitat suggests a reach-scale benefit for fishes through increased abundance of favored prey and enhanced prey diversity. Additionally, given the paucity of rocky substrata in the river as a whole, rock weirs enhance fish species richness by providing habitat for less common benthic species.</abstract><cop>New York</cop><pub>Springer US</pub><pmid>29589139</pmid><doi>10.1007/s00267-018-1022-9</doi><tpages>11</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3614-7023</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0364-152X |
ispartof | Environmental management (New York), 2018-06, Vol.61 (6), p.928-938 |
issn | 0364-152X 1432-1009 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2019475881 |
source | MEDLINE; SpringerNature Journals |
subjects | Abundance Animals Aquatic Pollution Atmospheric Protection/Air Quality Control/Air Pollution Biodiversity Biomass Communities Community structure Diet Earth and Environmental Science Ecology Ecosystem Environment Environmental Management Environmental restoration Feeders Fish Fishes - classification Fishes - growth & development Food availability Forestry Management Habitat changes Habitats Heterogeneity Illinois Macroinvertebrates Nature Conservation Prey Restoration Rivers Rivers - chemistry Rocks Seines Species diversity Species richness Waste Water Technology Water Management Water Movements Water Pollution Control Weirs |
title | Fish Community Structure and Diet Responses to Newbury Weirs in a Low-Gradient River |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-05T16%3A39%3A36IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Fish%20Community%20Structure%20and%20Diet%20Responses%20to%20Newbury%20Weirs%20in%20a%20Low-Gradient%20River&rft.jtitle=Environmental%20management%20(New%20York)&rft.au=Bonjour,%20Sophia%20M.&rft.date=2018-06-01&rft.volume=61&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=928&rft.epage=938&rft.pages=928-938&rft.issn=0364-152X&rft.eissn=1432-1009&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s00267-018-1022-9&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2019475881%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2018877681&rft_id=info:pmid/29589139&rfr_iscdi=true |