Representing a large region with few sites: The Quality Index approach for field studies

[Display omitted] Many environmental studies require the characterization of a large geographical region using a range of representative sites amenable to intensive study. A systematic approach to selecting study areas can help ensure that an adequate range of the variables of interest is captured....

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The Science of the total environment 2018-08, Vol.633, p.600-607
Hauptverfasser: Rosamond, Madeline S., Wellen, Christopher, Yousif, Meguel A., Kaltenecker, Georgina, Thomas, Janis L., Joosse, Pamela J., Feisthauer, Natalie C., Taylor, William D., Mohamed, Mohamed N.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 607
container_issue
container_start_page 600
container_title The Science of the total environment
container_volume 633
creator Rosamond, Madeline S.
Wellen, Christopher
Yousif, Meguel A.
Kaltenecker, Georgina
Thomas, Janis L.
Joosse, Pamela J.
Feisthauer, Natalie C.
Taylor, William D.
Mohamed, Mohamed N.
description [Display omitted] Many environmental studies require the characterization of a large geographical region using a range of representative sites amenable to intensive study. A systematic approach to selecting study areas can help ensure that an adequate range of the variables of interest is captured. We present a novel method of selecting study sites representing a larger region, in which the region is divided into subregions, which are characterized with relevant independent variables, and displayed in mathematical variable space. Potential study sites are also displayed this way, and selected to cover the range in variables present in the region. The coverage of sites is assessed with the Quality Index, which compares the range and standard deviation of variables among the sites to that of the larger region, and prioritizes sites that are well-distributed (i.e. not clumped) in variable space. We illustrate the method with a case study examining relationships between agricultural land use, physiography and stream phosphorus (P) export, in which we selected several variables representing agricultural P inputs and landscape susceptibility to P loss. A geographic area of 110,000km2 was represented with 11 study sites with good coverage of four variables representing agricultural P inputs and transport mechanisms taken from commonly-available geospatial datasets. We use a genetic algorithm to select 11 sites with the highest possible QI and compare these, post-hoc, to our sites. This approach reduces subjectivity in site selection, considers practical constraints and easily allows for site reselection if necessary. This site selection approach can easily be adapted to different landscapes and study goals, as we provide an algorithm and computer code to reproduce our approach elsewhere. •We present a novel way to select sites for field studies representing a larger region: the Quality Index.•The Quality Index prioritizes sites that cover the range in variables of interest of a larger region and are well-distributed in variable space.•A genetic algorithm allows for selecting optimal sites by maximizing the QI.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.03.113
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2019463121</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0048969718308696</els_id><sourcerecordid>2019463121</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c420t-c9245017b2c890dfc4468d8d37ac2c3b8519056369b490a517d8e4cba25c3583</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkMlOwzAQhi0EgrK8AvjIJcFLFpsbQmwSEgL1wM1y7EnrKk2K7RR4e1wVemUuc_n-WT6ELijJKaHV1SIPxsUhQr_OGaEiJzynlO-hCRW1zChh1T6aEFKITFayPkLHISxIqlrQQ3TEZClqxuQEvb_BykOAPrp-hjXutJ8B9jBzQ48_XZzjFj5xcBHCNZ7OAb-OunPxGz_1Fr6wXq38oE2iBo9bB53FIY7WQThFB63uApz99hM0vb-b3j5mzy8PT7c3z5kpGImZkawoCa0bZoQktjVFUQkrLK-1YYY3oqSSlBWvZFNIoktaWwGFaTQrDS8FP0GX27Hpjo8RQlRLFwx0ne5hGINKcmRRccpoQustavwQgodWrbxbav-tKFEbq2qhdlY3QaEIV8lqSp7_LhmbJdhd7k9jAm62AKRP1w78ZhD0BqzzYKKyg_t3yQ-j-Y0I</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2019463121</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Representing a large region with few sites: The Quality Index approach for field studies</title><source>ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present)</source><creator>Rosamond, Madeline S. ; Wellen, Christopher ; Yousif, Meguel A. ; Kaltenecker, Georgina ; Thomas, Janis L. ; Joosse, Pamela J. ; Feisthauer, Natalie C. ; Taylor, William D. ; Mohamed, Mohamed N.</creator><creatorcontrib>Rosamond, Madeline S. ; Wellen, Christopher ; Yousif, Meguel A. ; Kaltenecker, Georgina ; Thomas, Janis L. ; Joosse, Pamela J. ; Feisthauer, Natalie C. ; Taylor, William D. ; Mohamed, Mohamed N.</creatorcontrib><description>[Display omitted] Many environmental studies require the characterization of a large geographical region using a range of representative sites amenable to intensive study. A systematic approach to selecting study areas can help ensure that an adequate range of the variables of interest is captured. We present a novel method of selecting study sites representing a larger region, in which the region is divided into subregions, which are characterized with relevant independent variables, and displayed in mathematical variable space. Potential study sites are also displayed this way, and selected to cover the range in variables present in the region. The coverage of sites is assessed with the Quality Index, which compares the range and standard deviation of variables among the sites to that of the larger region, and prioritizes sites that are well-distributed (i.e. not clumped) in variable space. We illustrate the method with a case study examining relationships between agricultural land use, physiography and stream phosphorus (P) export, in which we selected several variables representing agricultural P inputs and landscape susceptibility to P loss. A geographic area of 110,000km2 was represented with 11 study sites with good coverage of four variables representing agricultural P inputs and transport mechanisms taken from commonly-available geospatial datasets. We use a genetic algorithm to select 11 sites with the highest possible QI and compare these, post-hoc, to our sites. This approach reduces subjectivity in site selection, considers practical constraints and easily allows for site reselection if necessary. This site selection approach can easily be adapted to different landscapes and study goals, as we provide an algorithm and computer code to reproduce our approach elsewhere. •We present a novel way to select sites for field studies representing a larger region: the Quality Index.•The Quality Index prioritizes sites that cover the range in variables of interest of a larger region and are well-distributed in variable space.•A genetic algorithm allows for selecting optimal sites by maximizing the QI.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0048-9697</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1879-1026</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.03.113</identifier><identifier>PMID: 29587229</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Netherlands: Elsevier B.V</publisher><subject>Field studies ; Optimization ; Site selection ; Study design</subject><ispartof>The Science of the total environment, 2018-08, Vol.633, p.600-607</ispartof><rights>2018</rights><rights>Crown Copyright © 2018. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c420t-c9245017b2c890dfc4468d8d37ac2c3b8519056369b490a517d8e4cba25c3583</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c420t-c9245017b2c890dfc4468d8d37ac2c3b8519056369b490a517d8e4cba25c3583</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-7163-2190</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.03.113$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3548,27923,27924,45994</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29587229$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Rosamond, Madeline S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wellen, Christopher</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yousif, Meguel A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kaltenecker, Georgina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Thomas, Janis L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Joosse, Pamela J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Feisthauer, Natalie C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Taylor, William D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mohamed, Mohamed N.</creatorcontrib><title>Representing a large region with few sites: The Quality Index approach for field studies</title><title>The Science of the total environment</title><addtitle>Sci Total Environ</addtitle><description>[Display omitted] Many environmental studies require the characterization of a large geographical region using a range of representative sites amenable to intensive study. A systematic approach to selecting study areas can help ensure that an adequate range of the variables of interest is captured. We present a novel method of selecting study sites representing a larger region, in which the region is divided into subregions, which are characterized with relevant independent variables, and displayed in mathematical variable space. Potential study sites are also displayed this way, and selected to cover the range in variables present in the region. The coverage of sites is assessed with the Quality Index, which compares the range and standard deviation of variables among the sites to that of the larger region, and prioritizes sites that are well-distributed (i.e. not clumped) in variable space. We illustrate the method with a case study examining relationships between agricultural land use, physiography and stream phosphorus (P) export, in which we selected several variables representing agricultural P inputs and landscape susceptibility to P loss. A geographic area of 110,000km2 was represented with 11 study sites with good coverage of four variables representing agricultural P inputs and transport mechanisms taken from commonly-available geospatial datasets. We use a genetic algorithm to select 11 sites with the highest possible QI and compare these, post-hoc, to our sites. This approach reduces subjectivity in site selection, considers practical constraints and easily allows for site reselection if necessary. This site selection approach can easily be adapted to different landscapes and study goals, as we provide an algorithm and computer code to reproduce our approach elsewhere. •We present a novel way to select sites for field studies representing a larger region: the Quality Index.•The Quality Index prioritizes sites that cover the range in variables of interest of a larger region and are well-distributed in variable space.•A genetic algorithm allows for selecting optimal sites by maximizing the QI.</description><subject>Field studies</subject><subject>Optimization</subject><subject>Site selection</subject><subject>Study design</subject><issn>0048-9697</issn><issn>1879-1026</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkMlOwzAQhi0EgrK8AvjIJcFLFpsbQmwSEgL1wM1y7EnrKk2K7RR4e1wVemUuc_n-WT6ELijJKaHV1SIPxsUhQr_OGaEiJzynlO-hCRW1zChh1T6aEFKITFayPkLHISxIqlrQQ3TEZClqxuQEvb_BykOAPrp-hjXutJ8B9jBzQ48_XZzjFj5xcBHCNZ7OAb-OunPxGz_1Fr6wXq38oE2iBo9bB53FIY7WQThFB63uApz99hM0vb-b3j5mzy8PT7c3z5kpGImZkawoCa0bZoQktjVFUQkrLK-1YYY3oqSSlBWvZFNIoktaWwGFaTQrDS8FP0GX27Hpjo8RQlRLFwx0ne5hGINKcmRRccpoQustavwQgodWrbxbav-tKFEbq2qhdlY3QaEIV8lqSp7_LhmbJdhd7k9jAm62AKRP1w78ZhD0BqzzYKKyg_t3yQ-j-Y0I</recordid><startdate>20180815</startdate><enddate>20180815</enddate><creator>Rosamond, Madeline S.</creator><creator>Wellen, Christopher</creator><creator>Yousif, Meguel A.</creator><creator>Kaltenecker, Georgina</creator><creator>Thomas, Janis L.</creator><creator>Joosse, Pamela J.</creator><creator>Feisthauer, Natalie C.</creator><creator>Taylor, William D.</creator><creator>Mohamed, Mohamed N.</creator><general>Elsevier B.V</general><scope>6I.</scope><scope>AAFTH</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7163-2190</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20180815</creationdate><title>Representing a large region with few sites: The Quality Index approach for field studies</title><author>Rosamond, Madeline S. ; Wellen, Christopher ; Yousif, Meguel A. ; Kaltenecker, Georgina ; Thomas, Janis L. ; Joosse, Pamela J. ; Feisthauer, Natalie C. ; Taylor, William D. ; Mohamed, Mohamed N.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c420t-c9245017b2c890dfc4468d8d37ac2c3b8519056369b490a517d8e4cba25c3583</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Field studies</topic><topic>Optimization</topic><topic>Site selection</topic><topic>Study design</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Rosamond, Madeline S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wellen, Christopher</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yousif, Meguel A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kaltenecker, Georgina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Thomas, Janis L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Joosse, Pamela J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Feisthauer, Natalie C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Taylor, William D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mohamed, Mohamed N.</creatorcontrib><collection>ScienceDirect Open Access Titles</collection><collection>Elsevier:ScienceDirect:Open Access</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>The Science of the total environment</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Rosamond, Madeline S.</au><au>Wellen, Christopher</au><au>Yousif, Meguel A.</au><au>Kaltenecker, Georgina</au><au>Thomas, Janis L.</au><au>Joosse, Pamela J.</au><au>Feisthauer, Natalie C.</au><au>Taylor, William D.</au><au>Mohamed, Mohamed N.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Representing a large region with few sites: The Quality Index approach for field studies</atitle><jtitle>The Science of the total environment</jtitle><addtitle>Sci Total Environ</addtitle><date>2018-08-15</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>633</volume><spage>600</spage><epage>607</epage><pages>600-607</pages><issn>0048-9697</issn><eissn>1879-1026</eissn><abstract>[Display omitted] Many environmental studies require the characterization of a large geographical region using a range of representative sites amenable to intensive study. A systematic approach to selecting study areas can help ensure that an adequate range of the variables of interest is captured. We present a novel method of selecting study sites representing a larger region, in which the region is divided into subregions, which are characterized with relevant independent variables, and displayed in mathematical variable space. Potential study sites are also displayed this way, and selected to cover the range in variables present in the region. The coverage of sites is assessed with the Quality Index, which compares the range and standard deviation of variables among the sites to that of the larger region, and prioritizes sites that are well-distributed (i.e. not clumped) in variable space. We illustrate the method with a case study examining relationships between agricultural land use, physiography and stream phosphorus (P) export, in which we selected several variables representing agricultural P inputs and landscape susceptibility to P loss. A geographic area of 110,000km2 was represented with 11 study sites with good coverage of four variables representing agricultural P inputs and transport mechanisms taken from commonly-available geospatial datasets. We use a genetic algorithm to select 11 sites with the highest possible QI and compare these, post-hoc, to our sites. This approach reduces subjectivity in site selection, considers practical constraints and easily allows for site reselection if necessary. This site selection approach can easily be adapted to different landscapes and study goals, as we provide an algorithm and computer code to reproduce our approach elsewhere. •We present a novel way to select sites for field studies representing a larger region: the Quality Index.•The Quality Index prioritizes sites that cover the range in variables of interest of a larger region and are well-distributed in variable space.•A genetic algorithm allows for selecting optimal sites by maximizing the QI.</abstract><cop>Netherlands</cop><pub>Elsevier B.V</pub><pmid>29587229</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.03.113</doi><tpages>8</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7163-2190</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0048-9697
ispartof The Science of the total environment, 2018-08, Vol.633, p.600-607
issn 0048-9697
1879-1026
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2019463121
source ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present)
subjects Field studies
Optimization
Site selection
Study design
title Representing a large region with few sites: The Quality Index approach for field studies
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-12T22%3A52%3A12IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Representing%20a%20large%20region%20with%20few%20sites:%20The%20Quality%20Index%20approach%20for%20field%20studies&rft.jtitle=The%20Science%20of%20the%20total%20environment&rft.au=Rosamond,%20Madeline%20S.&rft.date=2018-08-15&rft.volume=633&rft.spage=600&rft.epage=607&rft.pages=600-607&rft.issn=0048-9697&rft.eissn=1879-1026&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.03.113&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2019463121%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2019463121&rft_id=info:pmid/29587229&rft_els_id=S0048969718308696&rfr_iscdi=true