Segregation of temporal and spatial distribution between kleptoparasites and parasitoids of the eusocial sweat bee, Lasioglossum malachurum (Hymenoptera: Halictidae, Mutillidae)

Cuckoo bees and velvet ants use different resources of their shared host bees, the former laying eggs on the host pollen stores and the latter on immature stages. We studied the activity patterns of the cuckoo bee Sphecodes monilicornis and the velvet ant Myrmilla capitata at two nesting sites of th...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Entomological science 2009-06, Vol.12 (2), p.116-129
Hauptverfasser: POLIDORI, Carlo, BORRUSO, Luigimaria, BOESI, Roberto, ANDRIETTI, Francesco
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 129
container_issue 2
container_start_page 116
container_title Entomological science
container_volume 12
creator POLIDORI, Carlo
BORRUSO, Luigimaria
BOESI, Roberto
ANDRIETTI, Francesco
description Cuckoo bees and velvet ants use different resources of their shared host bees, the former laying eggs on the host pollen stores and the latter on immature stages. We studied the activity patterns of the cuckoo bee Sphecodes monilicornis and the velvet ant Myrmilla capitata at two nesting sites of their host, the social digger bee Lasioglossum malachurum, over a 3 year period. Due to the difference in host exploitation, we expected different temporal patterns of the two natural enemies as well as a positive spatial association with host nest density for both species. At a daily level, S. monilicornis was more abundant between 10.00 and 15.00 h, while M. capitata was most active in the early morning and late afternoon; both species activities were independent from host provisioning activity. The activity of cuckoo bees was in general positively correlated with the density of open host nests (but not with the total number of nests), while that of velvet ants was rarely correlated with this factor. Sphecodes monilicornis was seen both attacking the guard bees and directly entering into the host nests or digging close to nest entrances, while M. capitata only gained access to host nests through digging. We conclude that the temporal and spatial segregation between the two species may be, at least partially, explained both by the different resources exploited and by the different dynamics of host interactions.
doi_str_mv 10.1111/j.1479-8298.2009.00311.x
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_20193049</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1769162421</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4611-f9bb40d12338b7f1f4b4958dc19fb8a72548bd3931b2913b2620910dc42c60143</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkU9v0zAYhyMEEmPwGYg4IJBI8L8mNtoFVVsLKuPQTRwtJ3nTuXPiYDtq-7H2Dee00w6c8CU_x8_zJtYvSVKMchzX122OWSkyTgTPCUIiR4hinO9fJGfPBy9jpoxmvOTF6-SN91uECGFEnCUPa9g42KigbZ_aNg3QDdYpk6q-Sf0Q38fcaB-crsYjVEHYAfTpvYEh2EE55XUAfxSedlY3_jjsDlIYva2nIX4HKkQbvqSrCNmNsd6PXdopo-q70cX4aXnooLdDAKe-pUtldB10o6LxK37bmCl_fpu8apXx8O7peZ7cXl3ezJfZ6vfix_z7KqtZgXHWiqpiqMGEUl6VLW5ZxcSMNzUWbcVVSWaMVw0VFFdEYFqRgiCBUVMzUhcIM3qefDzNHZz9O4IPstO-BmNUD3b0kiAsKGIigh_-Abd2dH38N0mwECUmJY8QP0G1i9d20MrB6U65g8RITkXKrZz6klNfcipSHouU-6henNSdNnD4b09eXq9jiHp20mOJsH_WlbuXRUnLmfxzvZDz1Q1b_FxfSRL59ye-VVaqjdNe3q7jZSnCBStEQekjsOe_nA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>219971278</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Segregation of temporal and spatial distribution between kleptoparasites and parasitoids of the eusocial sweat bee, Lasioglossum malachurum (Hymenoptera: Halictidae, Mutillidae)</title><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><creator>POLIDORI, Carlo ; BORRUSO, Luigimaria ; BOESI, Roberto ; ANDRIETTI, Francesco</creator><creatorcontrib>POLIDORI, Carlo ; BORRUSO, Luigimaria ; BOESI, Roberto ; ANDRIETTI, Francesco</creatorcontrib><description>Cuckoo bees and velvet ants use different resources of their shared host bees, the former laying eggs on the host pollen stores and the latter on immature stages. We studied the activity patterns of the cuckoo bee Sphecodes monilicornis and the velvet ant Myrmilla capitata at two nesting sites of their host, the social digger bee Lasioglossum malachurum, over a 3 year period. Due to the difference in host exploitation, we expected different temporal patterns of the two natural enemies as well as a positive spatial association with host nest density for both species. At a daily level, S. monilicornis was more abundant between 10.00 and 15.00 h, while M. capitata was most active in the early morning and late afternoon; both species activities were independent from host provisioning activity. The activity of cuckoo bees was in general positively correlated with the density of open host nests (but not with the total number of nests), while that of velvet ants was rarely correlated with this factor. Sphecodes monilicornis was seen both attacking the guard bees and directly entering into the host nests or digging close to nest entrances, while M. capitata only gained access to host nests through digging. We conclude that the temporal and spatial segregation between the two species may be, at least partially, explained both by the different resources exploited and by the different dynamics of host interactions.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1343-8786</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1479-8298</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/j.1479-8298.2009.00311.x</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Melbourne, Australia: Melbourne, Australia : Blackwell Publishing Asia</publisher><subject>Animal populations ; Animal reproduction ; Bees ; Entomology ; Formicidae ; Halictidae ; host-searching activity ; Hymenoptera ; Insects ; kleptoparasite ; Lasioglossum ; Mutillidae ; Myrmilla ; optimal foraging theory ; Parasites ; parasitoid ; Sphecodes</subject><ispartof>Entomological science, 2009-06, Vol.12 (2), p.116-129</ispartof><rights>2009 The Entomological Society of Japan</rights><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4611-f9bb40d12338b7f1f4b4958dc19fb8a72548bd3931b2913b2620910dc42c60143</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4611-f9bb40d12338b7f1f4b4958dc19fb8a72548bd3931b2913b2620910dc42c60143</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fj.1479-8298.2009.00311.x$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fj.1479-8298.2009.00311.x$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,27901,27902,45550,45551</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>POLIDORI, Carlo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>BORRUSO, Luigimaria</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>BOESI, Roberto</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>ANDRIETTI, Francesco</creatorcontrib><title>Segregation of temporal and spatial distribution between kleptoparasites and parasitoids of the eusocial sweat bee, Lasioglossum malachurum (Hymenoptera: Halictidae, Mutillidae)</title><title>Entomological science</title><description>Cuckoo bees and velvet ants use different resources of their shared host bees, the former laying eggs on the host pollen stores and the latter on immature stages. We studied the activity patterns of the cuckoo bee Sphecodes monilicornis and the velvet ant Myrmilla capitata at two nesting sites of their host, the social digger bee Lasioglossum malachurum, over a 3 year period. Due to the difference in host exploitation, we expected different temporal patterns of the two natural enemies as well as a positive spatial association with host nest density for both species. At a daily level, S. monilicornis was more abundant between 10.00 and 15.00 h, while M. capitata was most active in the early morning and late afternoon; both species activities were independent from host provisioning activity. The activity of cuckoo bees was in general positively correlated with the density of open host nests (but not with the total number of nests), while that of velvet ants was rarely correlated with this factor. Sphecodes monilicornis was seen both attacking the guard bees and directly entering into the host nests or digging close to nest entrances, while M. capitata only gained access to host nests through digging. We conclude that the temporal and spatial segregation between the two species may be, at least partially, explained both by the different resources exploited and by the different dynamics of host interactions.</description><subject>Animal populations</subject><subject>Animal reproduction</subject><subject>Bees</subject><subject>Entomology</subject><subject>Formicidae</subject><subject>Halictidae</subject><subject>host-searching activity</subject><subject>Hymenoptera</subject><subject>Insects</subject><subject>kleptoparasite</subject><subject>Lasioglossum</subject><subject>Mutillidae</subject><subject>Myrmilla</subject><subject>optimal foraging theory</subject><subject>Parasites</subject><subject>parasitoid</subject><subject>Sphecodes</subject><issn>1343-8786</issn><issn>1479-8298</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2009</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqNkU9v0zAYhyMEEmPwGYg4IJBI8L8mNtoFVVsLKuPQTRwtJ3nTuXPiYDtq-7H2Dee00w6c8CU_x8_zJtYvSVKMchzX122OWSkyTgTPCUIiR4hinO9fJGfPBy9jpoxmvOTF6-SN91uECGFEnCUPa9g42KigbZ_aNg3QDdYpk6q-Sf0Q38fcaB-crsYjVEHYAfTpvYEh2EE55XUAfxSedlY3_jjsDlIYva2nIX4HKkQbvqSrCNmNsd6PXdopo-q70cX4aXnooLdDAKe-pUtldB10o6LxK37bmCl_fpu8apXx8O7peZ7cXl3ezJfZ6vfix_z7KqtZgXHWiqpiqMGEUl6VLW5ZxcSMNzUWbcVVSWaMVw0VFFdEYFqRgiCBUVMzUhcIM3qefDzNHZz9O4IPstO-BmNUD3b0kiAsKGIigh_-Abd2dH38N0mwECUmJY8QP0G1i9d20MrB6U65g8RITkXKrZz6klNfcipSHouU-6henNSdNnD4b09eXq9jiHp20mOJsH_WlbuXRUnLmfxzvZDz1Q1b_FxfSRL59ye-VVaqjdNe3q7jZSnCBStEQekjsOe_nA</recordid><startdate>200906</startdate><enddate>200906</enddate><creator>POLIDORI, Carlo</creator><creator>BORRUSO, Luigimaria</creator><creator>BOESI, Roberto</creator><creator>ANDRIETTI, Francesco</creator><general>Melbourne, Australia : Blackwell Publishing Asia</general><general>Blackwell Publishing Asia</general><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>FBQ</scope><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>H95</scope><scope>L.G</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200906</creationdate><title>Segregation of temporal and spatial distribution between kleptoparasites and parasitoids of the eusocial sweat bee, Lasioglossum malachurum (Hymenoptera: Halictidae, Mutillidae)</title><author>POLIDORI, Carlo ; BORRUSO, Luigimaria ; BOESI, Roberto ; ANDRIETTI, Francesco</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4611-f9bb40d12338b7f1f4b4958dc19fb8a72548bd3931b2913b2620910dc42c60143</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2009</creationdate><topic>Animal populations</topic><topic>Animal reproduction</topic><topic>Bees</topic><topic>Entomology</topic><topic>Formicidae</topic><topic>Halictidae</topic><topic>host-searching activity</topic><topic>Hymenoptera</topic><topic>Insects</topic><topic>kleptoparasite</topic><topic>Lasioglossum</topic><topic>Mutillidae</topic><topic>Myrmilla</topic><topic>optimal foraging theory</topic><topic>Parasites</topic><topic>parasitoid</topic><topic>Sphecodes</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>POLIDORI, Carlo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>BORRUSO, Luigimaria</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>BOESI, Roberto</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>ANDRIETTI, Francesco</creatorcontrib><collection>AGRIS</collection><collection>Istex</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 1: Biological Sciences &amp; Living Resources</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><jtitle>Entomological science</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>POLIDORI, Carlo</au><au>BORRUSO, Luigimaria</au><au>BOESI, Roberto</au><au>ANDRIETTI, Francesco</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Segregation of temporal and spatial distribution between kleptoparasites and parasitoids of the eusocial sweat bee, Lasioglossum malachurum (Hymenoptera: Halictidae, Mutillidae)</atitle><jtitle>Entomological science</jtitle><date>2009-06</date><risdate>2009</risdate><volume>12</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>116</spage><epage>129</epage><pages>116-129</pages><issn>1343-8786</issn><eissn>1479-8298</eissn><abstract>Cuckoo bees and velvet ants use different resources of their shared host bees, the former laying eggs on the host pollen stores and the latter on immature stages. We studied the activity patterns of the cuckoo bee Sphecodes monilicornis and the velvet ant Myrmilla capitata at two nesting sites of their host, the social digger bee Lasioglossum malachurum, over a 3 year period. Due to the difference in host exploitation, we expected different temporal patterns of the two natural enemies as well as a positive spatial association with host nest density for both species. At a daily level, S. monilicornis was more abundant between 10.00 and 15.00 h, while M. capitata was most active in the early morning and late afternoon; both species activities were independent from host provisioning activity. The activity of cuckoo bees was in general positively correlated with the density of open host nests (but not with the total number of nests), while that of velvet ants was rarely correlated with this factor. Sphecodes monilicornis was seen both attacking the guard bees and directly entering into the host nests or digging close to nest entrances, while M. capitata only gained access to host nests through digging. We conclude that the temporal and spatial segregation between the two species may be, at least partially, explained both by the different resources exploited and by the different dynamics of host interactions.</abstract><cop>Melbourne, Australia</cop><pub>Melbourne, Australia : Blackwell Publishing Asia</pub><doi>10.1111/j.1479-8298.2009.00311.x</doi><tpages>14</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1343-8786
ispartof Entomological science, 2009-06, Vol.12 (2), p.116-129
issn 1343-8786
1479-8298
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_20193049
source Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete
subjects Animal populations
Animal reproduction
Bees
Entomology
Formicidae
Halictidae
host-searching activity
Hymenoptera
Insects
kleptoparasite
Lasioglossum
Mutillidae
Myrmilla
optimal foraging theory
Parasites
parasitoid
Sphecodes
title Segregation of temporal and spatial distribution between kleptoparasites and parasitoids of the eusocial sweat bee, Lasioglossum malachurum (Hymenoptera: Halictidae, Mutillidae)
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-28T20%3A29%3A33IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Segregation%20of%20temporal%20and%20spatial%20distribution%20between%20kleptoparasites%20and%20parasitoids%20of%20the%20eusocial%20sweat%20bee,%20Lasioglossum%20malachurum%20(Hymenoptera:%20Halictidae,%20Mutillidae)&rft.jtitle=Entomological%20science&rft.au=POLIDORI,%20Carlo&rft.date=2009-06&rft.volume=12&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=116&rft.epage=129&rft.pages=116-129&rft.issn=1343-8786&rft.eissn=1479-8298&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/j.1479-8298.2009.00311.x&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1769162421%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=219971278&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true