Elucidating Environmental Fingerprinting Mechanisms of Unconventional Gas Development through Hydrocarbon Analysis

Hydraulic fracturing is an increasingly common technique for the extraction of natural gas entrapped in shale formations. This technique has been highly criticized due to the possibility of environmental contamination, underscoring the need for method development to identify chemical factors that co...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Analytical chemistry (Washington) 2018-04, Vol.90 (8), p.5466-5473
Hauptverfasser: Piotrowski, Paulina K, Weggler, Benedikt A, Yoxtheimer, David A, Kelly, Christina N, Barth-Naftilan, Erica, Saiers, James E, Dorman, Frank L
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 5473
container_issue 8
container_start_page 5466
container_title Analytical chemistry (Washington)
container_volume 90
creator Piotrowski, Paulina K
Weggler, Benedikt A
Yoxtheimer, David A
Kelly, Christina N
Barth-Naftilan, Erica
Saiers, James E
Dorman, Frank L
description Hydraulic fracturing is an increasingly common technique for the extraction of natural gas entrapped in shale formations. This technique has been highly criticized due to the possibility of environmental contamination, underscoring the need for method development to identify chemical factors that could be utilized in point-source identification of environmental contamination events. Here, we utilize comprehensive two-dimensional gas chromatography (GC × GC) coupled to high-resolution time-of-flight (HRT) mass spectrometry, which offers a unique instrumental combination allowing for petroleomics hydrocarbon fingerprinting. Four flowback fluids from Marcellus shale gas wells in geographic proximity were analyzed for differentiating factors that could be exploited in environmental forensics investigations of shale gas impacts. Kendrick mass defect (KMD) plots of these flowback fluids illustrated well-to-well differences in heteroatomic substituted hydrocarbons, while GC × GC separations showed variance in cyclic hydrocarbons and polyaromatic hydrocarbons among the four wells. Additionally, generating plots that combine GC × GC separation with KMD established a novel data-rich visualization technique that further differentiated the samples.
doi_str_mv 10.1021/acs.analchem.8b00822
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2019039802</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2019039802</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a413t-19410eb73bc6cbc947e4233f544f85c3dee1c37e5ded39cacaa7db62f577bded3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kclOwzAURS0EgjL8AUKW2LBJeR4yLRF0QAKxgXXkOC9tqsQudlKpf49LCwsWrCw9n3v95EPINYMxA87ulfZjZVSrl9iNsxIg4_yIjFjMIUqyjB-TEQCIiKcAZ-Tc-xUAY8CSU3LG8zgDkNmIuEk76KZSfWMWdGI2jbOmQ9Orlk7DCN3aNeb78hX1UpnGd57amn4Ybc0mgI0NO9CZ8vQJN9ja9S5N-6Wzw2JJ59vKWa1caQ19CODWN_6SnNSq9Xh1OC_Ix3Ty_jiPXt5mz48PL5GSTPQRyyUDLFNR6kSXOpcpSi5EHUtZZ7EWFSLTIsW4wkrkWmml0qpMeB2nabmbXZC7fe_a2c8BfV90jdfYtsqgHXzBgeUg8gx4QG__oCs7uLBvoBhIlnKIk0DJPaWd9d5hXYTP6ZTbFgyKnZMiOCl-nBQHJyF2cygfyg6r39CPhADAHtjFfx_-t_MLAxqeeg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2104172056</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Elucidating Environmental Fingerprinting Mechanisms of Unconventional Gas Development through Hydrocarbon Analysis</title><source>ACS Publications</source><creator>Piotrowski, Paulina K ; Weggler, Benedikt A ; Yoxtheimer, David A ; Kelly, Christina N ; Barth-Naftilan, Erica ; Saiers, James E ; Dorman, Frank L</creator><creatorcontrib>Piotrowski, Paulina K ; Weggler, Benedikt A ; Yoxtheimer, David A ; Kelly, Christina N ; Barth-Naftilan, Erica ; Saiers, James E ; Dorman, Frank L</creatorcontrib><description>Hydraulic fracturing is an increasingly common technique for the extraction of natural gas entrapped in shale formations. This technique has been highly criticized due to the possibility of environmental contamination, underscoring the need for method development to identify chemical factors that could be utilized in point-source identification of environmental contamination events. Here, we utilize comprehensive two-dimensional gas chromatography (GC × GC) coupled to high-resolution time-of-flight (HRT) mass spectrometry, which offers a unique instrumental combination allowing for petroleomics hydrocarbon fingerprinting. Four flowback fluids from Marcellus shale gas wells in geographic proximity were analyzed for differentiating factors that could be exploited in environmental forensics investigations of shale gas impacts. Kendrick mass defect (KMD) plots of these flowback fluids illustrated well-to-well differences in heteroatomic substituted hydrocarbons, while GC × GC separations showed variance in cyclic hydrocarbons and polyaromatic hydrocarbons among the four wells. Additionally, generating plots that combine GC × GC separation with KMD established a novel data-rich visualization technique that further differentiated the samples.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0003-2700</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1520-6882</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1021/acs.analchem.8b00822</identifier><identifier>PMID: 29580048</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: American Chemical Society</publisher><subject>Analytical chemistry ; Chemistry ; Contamination ; Cyclic hydrocarbons ; Extraction processes ; Fingerprinting ; Gas chromatography ; Gas wells ; Gases ; Hydraulic fracturing ; Hydrocarbons ; Mass spectrometry ; Natural gas ; Organic chemistry ; Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons ; Shale gas</subject><ispartof>Analytical chemistry (Washington), 2018-04, Vol.90 (8), p.5466-5473</ispartof><rights>Copyright American Chemical Society Apr 17, 2018</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a413t-19410eb73bc6cbc947e4233f544f85c3dee1c37e5ded39cacaa7db62f577bded3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-a413t-19410eb73bc6cbc947e4233f544f85c3dee1c37e5ded39cacaa7db62f577bded3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-8039-7911</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://pubs.acs.org/doi/pdf/10.1021/acs.analchem.8b00822$$EPDF$$P50$$Gacs$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acs.analchem.8b00822$$EHTML$$P50$$Gacs$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>315,781,785,2766,27081,27929,27930,56743,56793</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29580048$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Piotrowski, Paulina K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Weggler, Benedikt A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yoxtheimer, David A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kelly, Christina N</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Barth-Naftilan, Erica</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Saiers, James E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dorman, Frank L</creatorcontrib><title>Elucidating Environmental Fingerprinting Mechanisms of Unconventional Gas Development through Hydrocarbon Analysis</title><title>Analytical chemistry (Washington)</title><addtitle>Anal. Chem</addtitle><description>Hydraulic fracturing is an increasingly common technique for the extraction of natural gas entrapped in shale formations. This technique has been highly criticized due to the possibility of environmental contamination, underscoring the need for method development to identify chemical factors that could be utilized in point-source identification of environmental contamination events. Here, we utilize comprehensive two-dimensional gas chromatography (GC × GC) coupled to high-resolution time-of-flight (HRT) mass spectrometry, which offers a unique instrumental combination allowing for petroleomics hydrocarbon fingerprinting. Four flowback fluids from Marcellus shale gas wells in geographic proximity were analyzed for differentiating factors that could be exploited in environmental forensics investigations of shale gas impacts. Kendrick mass defect (KMD) plots of these flowback fluids illustrated well-to-well differences in heteroatomic substituted hydrocarbons, while GC × GC separations showed variance in cyclic hydrocarbons and polyaromatic hydrocarbons among the four wells. Additionally, generating plots that combine GC × GC separation with KMD established a novel data-rich visualization technique that further differentiated the samples.</description><subject>Analytical chemistry</subject><subject>Chemistry</subject><subject>Contamination</subject><subject>Cyclic hydrocarbons</subject><subject>Extraction processes</subject><subject>Fingerprinting</subject><subject>Gas chromatography</subject><subject>Gas wells</subject><subject>Gases</subject><subject>Hydraulic fracturing</subject><subject>Hydrocarbons</subject><subject>Mass spectrometry</subject><subject>Natural gas</subject><subject>Organic chemistry</subject><subject>Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons</subject><subject>Shale gas</subject><issn>0003-2700</issn><issn>1520-6882</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kclOwzAURS0EgjL8AUKW2LBJeR4yLRF0QAKxgXXkOC9tqsQudlKpf49LCwsWrCw9n3v95EPINYMxA87ulfZjZVSrl9iNsxIg4_yIjFjMIUqyjB-TEQCIiKcAZ-Tc-xUAY8CSU3LG8zgDkNmIuEk76KZSfWMWdGI2jbOmQ9Orlk7DCN3aNeb78hX1UpnGd57amn4Ybc0mgI0NO9CZ8vQJN9ja9S5N-6Wzw2JJ59vKWa1caQ19CODWN_6SnNSq9Xh1OC_Ix3Ty_jiPXt5mz48PL5GSTPQRyyUDLFNR6kSXOpcpSi5EHUtZZ7EWFSLTIsW4wkrkWmml0qpMeB2nabmbXZC7fe_a2c8BfV90jdfYtsqgHXzBgeUg8gx4QG__oCs7uLBvoBhIlnKIk0DJPaWd9d5hXYTP6ZTbFgyKnZMiOCl-nBQHJyF2cygfyg6r39CPhADAHtjFfx_-t_MLAxqeeg</recordid><startdate>20180417</startdate><enddate>20180417</enddate><creator>Piotrowski, Paulina K</creator><creator>Weggler, Benedikt A</creator><creator>Yoxtheimer, David A</creator><creator>Kelly, Christina N</creator><creator>Barth-Naftilan, Erica</creator><creator>Saiers, James E</creator><creator>Dorman, Frank L</creator><general>American Chemical Society</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QF</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7QQ</scope><scope>7SC</scope><scope>7SE</scope><scope>7SP</scope><scope>7SR</scope><scope>7TA</scope><scope>7TB</scope><scope>7TM</scope><scope>7U5</scope><scope>7U7</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>8BQ</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F28</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H8D</scope><scope>H8G</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>JG9</scope><scope>JQ2</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>L~C</scope><scope>L~D</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8039-7911</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20180417</creationdate><title>Elucidating Environmental Fingerprinting Mechanisms of Unconventional Gas Development through Hydrocarbon Analysis</title><author>Piotrowski, Paulina K ; Weggler, Benedikt A ; Yoxtheimer, David A ; Kelly, Christina N ; Barth-Naftilan, Erica ; Saiers, James E ; Dorman, Frank L</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a413t-19410eb73bc6cbc947e4233f544f85c3dee1c37e5ded39cacaa7db62f577bded3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Analytical chemistry</topic><topic>Chemistry</topic><topic>Contamination</topic><topic>Cyclic hydrocarbons</topic><topic>Extraction processes</topic><topic>Fingerprinting</topic><topic>Gas chromatography</topic><topic>Gas wells</topic><topic>Gases</topic><topic>Hydraulic fracturing</topic><topic>Hydrocarbons</topic><topic>Mass spectrometry</topic><topic>Natural gas</topic><topic>Organic chemistry</topic><topic>Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons</topic><topic>Shale gas</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Piotrowski, Paulina K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Weggler, Benedikt A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yoxtheimer, David A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kelly, Christina N</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Barth-Naftilan, Erica</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Saiers, James E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dorman, Frank L</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Aluminium Industry Abstracts</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Ceramic Abstracts</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts</collection><collection>Corrosion Abstracts</collection><collection>Electronics &amp; Communications Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineered Materials Abstracts</collection><collection>Materials Business File</collection><collection>Mechanical &amp; Transportation Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Nucleic Acids Abstracts</collection><collection>Solid State and Superconductivity Abstracts</collection><collection>Toxicology Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>METADEX</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ANTE: Abstracts in New Technology &amp; Engineering</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Aerospace Database</collection><collection>Copper Technical Reference Library</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Materials Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Computer Science Collection</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts – Academic</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts Professional</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Analytical chemistry (Washington)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Piotrowski, Paulina K</au><au>Weggler, Benedikt A</au><au>Yoxtheimer, David A</au><au>Kelly, Christina N</au><au>Barth-Naftilan, Erica</au><au>Saiers, James E</au><au>Dorman, Frank L</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Elucidating Environmental Fingerprinting Mechanisms of Unconventional Gas Development through Hydrocarbon Analysis</atitle><jtitle>Analytical chemistry (Washington)</jtitle><addtitle>Anal. Chem</addtitle><date>2018-04-17</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>90</volume><issue>8</issue><spage>5466</spage><epage>5473</epage><pages>5466-5473</pages><issn>0003-2700</issn><eissn>1520-6882</eissn><abstract>Hydraulic fracturing is an increasingly common technique for the extraction of natural gas entrapped in shale formations. This technique has been highly criticized due to the possibility of environmental contamination, underscoring the need for method development to identify chemical factors that could be utilized in point-source identification of environmental contamination events. Here, we utilize comprehensive two-dimensional gas chromatography (GC × GC) coupled to high-resolution time-of-flight (HRT) mass spectrometry, which offers a unique instrumental combination allowing for petroleomics hydrocarbon fingerprinting. Four flowback fluids from Marcellus shale gas wells in geographic proximity were analyzed for differentiating factors that could be exploited in environmental forensics investigations of shale gas impacts. Kendrick mass defect (KMD) plots of these flowback fluids illustrated well-to-well differences in heteroatomic substituted hydrocarbons, while GC × GC separations showed variance in cyclic hydrocarbons and polyaromatic hydrocarbons among the four wells. Additionally, generating plots that combine GC × GC separation with KMD established a novel data-rich visualization technique that further differentiated the samples.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>American Chemical Society</pub><pmid>29580048</pmid><doi>10.1021/acs.analchem.8b00822</doi><tpages>8</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8039-7911</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0003-2700
ispartof Analytical chemistry (Washington), 2018-04, Vol.90 (8), p.5466-5473
issn 0003-2700
1520-6882
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2019039802
source ACS Publications
subjects Analytical chemistry
Chemistry
Contamination
Cyclic hydrocarbons
Extraction processes
Fingerprinting
Gas chromatography
Gas wells
Gases
Hydraulic fracturing
Hydrocarbons
Mass spectrometry
Natural gas
Organic chemistry
Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons
Shale gas
title Elucidating Environmental Fingerprinting Mechanisms of Unconventional Gas Development through Hydrocarbon Analysis
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-12T08%3A02%3A45IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Elucidating%20Environmental%20Fingerprinting%20Mechanisms%20of%20Unconventional%20Gas%20Development%20through%20Hydrocarbon%20Analysis&rft.jtitle=Analytical%20chemistry%20(Washington)&rft.au=Piotrowski,%20Paulina%20K&rft.date=2018-04-17&rft.volume=90&rft.issue=8&rft.spage=5466&rft.epage=5473&rft.pages=5466-5473&rft.issn=0003-2700&rft.eissn=1520-6882&rft_id=info:doi/10.1021/acs.analchem.8b00822&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2019039802%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2104172056&rft_id=info:pmid/29580048&rfr_iscdi=true