Elucidating Environmental Fingerprinting Mechanisms of Unconventional Gas Development through Hydrocarbon Analysis
Hydraulic fracturing is an increasingly common technique for the extraction of natural gas entrapped in shale formations. This technique has been highly criticized due to the possibility of environmental contamination, underscoring the need for method development to identify chemical factors that co...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Analytical chemistry (Washington) 2018-04, Vol.90 (8), p.5466-5473 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 5473 |
---|---|
container_issue | 8 |
container_start_page | 5466 |
container_title | Analytical chemistry (Washington) |
container_volume | 90 |
creator | Piotrowski, Paulina K Weggler, Benedikt A Yoxtheimer, David A Kelly, Christina N Barth-Naftilan, Erica Saiers, James E Dorman, Frank L |
description | Hydraulic fracturing is an increasingly common technique for the extraction of natural gas entrapped in shale formations. This technique has been highly criticized due to the possibility of environmental contamination, underscoring the need for method development to identify chemical factors that could be utilized in point-source identification of environmental contamination events. Here, we utilize comprehensive two-dimensional gas chromatography (GC × GC) coupled to high-resolution time-of-flight (HRT) mass spectrometry, which offers a unique instrumental combination allowing for petroleomics hydrocarbon fingerprinting. Four flowback fluids from Marcellus shale gas wells in geographic proximity were analyzed for differentiating factors that could be exploited in environmental forensics investigations of shale gas impacts. Kendrick mass defect (KMD) plots of these flowback fluids illustrated well-to-well differences in heteroatomic substituted hydrocarbons, while GC × GC separations showed variance in cyclic hydrocarbons and polyaromatic hydrocarbons among the four wells. Additionally, generating plots that combine GC × GC separation with KMD established a novel data-rich visualization technique that further differentiated the samples. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1021/acs.analchem.8b00822 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2019039802</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2019039802</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a413t-19410eb73bc6cbc947e4233f544f85c3dee1c37e5ded39cacaa7db62f577bded3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kclOwzAURS0EgjL8AUKW2LBJeR4yLRF0QAKxgXXkOC9tqsQudlKpf49LCwsWrCw9n3v95EPINYMxA87ulfZjZVSrl9iNsxIg4_yIjFjMIUqyjB-TEQCIiKcAZ-Tc-xUAY8CSU3LG8zgDkNmIuEk76KZSfWMWdGI2jbOmQ9Orlk7DCN3aNeb78hX1UpnGd57amn4Ybc0mgI0NO9CZ8vQJN9ja9S5N-6Wzw2JJ59vKWa1caQ19CODWN_6SnNSq9Xh1OC_Ix3Ty_jiPXt5mz48PL5GSTPQRyyUDLFNR6kSXOpcpSi5EHUtZZ7EWFSLTIsW4wkrkWmml0qpMeB2nabmbXZC7fe_a2c8BfV90jdfYtsqgHXzBgeUg8gx4QG__oCs7uLBvoBhIlnKIk0DJPaWd9d5hXYTP6ZTbFgyKnZMiOCl-nBQHJyF2cygfyg6r39CPhADAHtjFfx_-t_MLAxqeeg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2104172056</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Elucidating Environmental Fingerprinting Mechanisms of Unconventional Gas Development through Hydrocarbon Analysis</title><source>ACS Publications</source><creator>Piotrowski, Paulina K ; Weggler, Benedikt A ; Yoxtheimer, David A ; Kelly, Christina N ; Barth-Naftilan, Erica ; Saiers, James E ; Dorman, Frank L</creator><creatorcontrib>Piotrowski, Paulina K ; Weggler, Benedikt A ; Yoxtheimer, David A ; Kelly, Christina N ; Barth-Naftilan, Erica ; Saiers, James E ; Dorman, Frank L</creatorcontrib><description>Hydraulic fracturing is an increasingly common technique for the extraction of natural gas entrapped in shale formations. This technique has been highly criticized due to the possibility of environmental contamination, underscoring the need for method development to identify chemical factors that could be utilized in point-source identification of environmental contamination events. Here, we utilize comprehensive two-dimensional gas chromatography (GC × GC) coupled to high-resolution time-of-flight (HRT) mass spectrometry, which offers a unique instrumental combination allowing for petroleomics hydrocarbon fingerprinting. Four flowback fluids from Marcellus shale gas wells in geographic proximity were analyzed for differentiating factors that could be exploited in environmental forensics investigations of shale gas impacts. Kendrick mass defect (KMD) plots of these flowback fluids illustrated well-to-well differences in heteroatomic substituted hydrocarbons, while GC × GC separations showed variance in cyclic hydrocarbons and polyaromatic hydrocarbons among the four wells. Additionally, generating plots that combine GC × GC separation with KMD established a novel data-rich visualization technique that further differentiated the samples.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0003-2700</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1520-6882</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1021/acs.analchem.8b00822</identifier><identifier>PMID: 29580048</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: American Chemical Society</publisher><subject>Analytical chemistry ; Chemistry ; Contamination ; Cyclic hydrocarbons ; Extraction processes ; Fingerprinting ; Gas chromatography ; Gas wells ; Gases ; Hydraulic fracturing ; Hydrocarbons ; Mass spectrometry ; Natural gas ; Organic chemistry ; Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons ; Shale gas</subject><ispartof>Analytical chemistry (Washington), 2018-04, Vol.90 (8), p.5466-5473</ispartof><rights>Copyright American Chemical Society Apr 17, 2018</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a413t-19410eb73bc6cbc947e4233f544f85c3dee1c37e5ded39cacaa7db62f577bded3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-a413t-19410eb73bc6cbc947e4233f544f85c3dee1c37e5ded39cacaa7db62f577bded3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-8039-7911</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://pubs.acs.org/doi/pdf/10.1021/acs.analchem.8b00822$$EPDF$$P50$$Gacs$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acs.analchem.8b00822$$EHTML$$P50$$Gacs$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>315,781,785,2766,27081,27929,27930,56743,56793</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29580048$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Piotrowski, Paulina K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Weggler, Benedikt A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yoxtheimer, David A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kelly, Christina N</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Barth-Naftilan, Erica</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Saiers, James E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dorman, Frank L</creatorcontrib><title>Elucidating Environmental Fingerprinting Mechanisms of Unconventional Gas Development through Hydrocarbon Analysis</title><title>Analytical chemistry (Washington)</title><addtitle>Anal. Chem</addtitle><description>Hydraulic fracturing is an increasingly common technique for the extraction of natural gas entrapped in shale formations. This technique has been highly criticized due to the possibility of environmental contamination, underscoring the need for method development to identify chemical factors that could be utilized in point-source identification of environmental contamination events. Here, we utilize comprehensive two-dimensional gas chromatography (GC × GC) coupled to high-resolution time-of-flight (HRT) mass spectrometry, which offers a unique instrumental combination allowing for petroleomics hydrocarbon fingerprinting. Four flowback fluids from Marcellus shale gas wells in geographic proximity were analyzed for differentiating factors that could be exploited in environmental forensics investigations of shale gas impacts. Kendrick mass defect (KMD) plots of these flowback fluids illustrated well-to-well differences in heteroatomic substituted hydrocarbons, while GC × GC separations showed variance in cyclic hydrocarbons and polyaromatic hydrocarbons among the four wells. Additionally, generating plots that combine GC × GC separation with KMD established a novel data-rich visualization technique that further differentiated the samples.</description><subject>Analytical chemistry</subject><subject>Chemistry</subject><subject>Contamination</subject><subject>Cyclic hydrocarbons</subject><subject>Extraction processes</subject><subject>Fingerprinting</subject><subject>Gas chromatography</subject><subject>Gas wells</subject><subject>Gases</subject><subject>Hydraulic fracturing</subject><subject>Hydrocarbons</subject><subject>Mass spectrometry</subject><subject>Natural gas</subject><subject>Organic chemistry</subject><subject>Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons</subject><subject>Shale gas</subject><issn>0003-2700</issn><issn>1520-6882</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kclOwzAURS0EgjL8AUKW2LBJeR4yLRF0QAKxgXXkOC9tqsQudlKpf49LCwsWrCw9n3v95EPINYMxA87ulfZjZVSrl9iNsxIg4_yIjFjMIUqyjB-TEQCIiKcAZ-Tc-xUAY8CSU3LG8zgDkNmIuEk76KZSfWMWdGI2jbOmQ9Orlk7DCN3aNeb78hX1UpnGd57amn4Ybc0mgI0NO9CZ8vQJN9ja9S5N-6Wzw2JJ59vKWa1caQ19CODWN_6SnNSq9Xh1OC_Ix3Ty_jiPXt5mz48PL5GSTPQRyyUDLFNR6kSXOpcpSi5EHUtZZ7EWFSLTIsW4wkrkWmml0qpMeB2nabmbXZC7fe_a2c8BfV90jdfYtsqgHXzBgeUg8gx4QG__oCs7uLBvoBhIlnKIk0DJPaWd9d5hXYTP6ZTbFgyKnZMiOCl-nBQHJyF2cygfyg6r39CPhADAHtjFfx_-t_MLAxqeeg</recordid><startdate>20180417</startdate><enddate>20180417</enddate><creator>Piotrowski, Paulina K</creator><creator>Weggler, Benedikt A</creator><creator>Yoxtheimer, David A</creator><creator>Kelly, Christina N</creator><creator>Barth-Naftilan, Erica</creator><creator>Saiers, James E</creator><creator>Dorman, Frank L</creator><general>American Chemical Society</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QF</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7QQ</scope><scope>7SC</scope><scope>7SE</scope><scope>7SP</scope><scope>7SR</scope><scope>7TA</scope><scope>7TB</scope><scope>7TM</scope><scope>7U5</scope><scope>7U7</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>8BQ</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F28</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H8D</scope><scope>H8G</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>JG9</scope><scope>JQ2</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>L~C</scope><scope>L~D</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8039-7911</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20180417</creationdate><title>Elucidating Environmental Fingerprinting Mechanisms of Unconventional Gas Development through Hydrocarbon Analysis</title><author>Piotrowski, Paulina K ; Weggler, Benedikt A ; Yoxtheimer, David A ; Kelly, Christina N ; Barth-Naftilan, Erica ; Saiers, James E ; Dorman, Frank L</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a413t-19410eb73bc6cbc947e4233f544f85c3dee1c37e5ded39cacaa7db62f577bded3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Analytical chemistry</topic><topic>Chemistry</topic><topic>Contamination</topic><topic>Cyclic hydrocarbons</topic><topic>Extraction processes</topic><topic>Fingerprinting</topic><topic>Gas chromatography</topic><topic>Gas wells</topic><topic>Gases</topic><topic>Hydraulic fracturing</topic><topic>Hydrocarbons</topic><topic>Mass spectrometry</topic><topic>Natural gas</topic><topic>Organic chemistry</topic><topic>Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons</topic><topic>Shale gas</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Piotrowski, Paulina K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Weggler, Benedikt A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yoxtheimer, David A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kelly, Christina N</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Barth-Naftilan, Erica</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Saiers, James E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dorman, Frank L</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Aluminium Industry Abstracts</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Ceramic Abstracts</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts</collection><collection>Corrosion Abstracts</collection><collection>Electronics & Communications Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineered Materials Abstracts</collection><collection>Materials Business File</collection><collection>Mechanical & Transportation Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Nucleic Acids Abstracts</collection><collection>Solid State and Superconductivity Abstracts</collection><collection>Toxicology Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>METADEX</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ANTE: Abstracts in New Technology & Engineering</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Aerospace Database</collection><collection>Copper Technical Reference Library</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Materials Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Computer Science Collection</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts Academic</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts Professional</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Analytical chemistry (Washington)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Piotrowski, Paulina K</au><au>Weggler, Benedikt A</au><au>Yoxtheimer, David A</au><au>Kelly, Christina N</au><au>Barth-Naftilan, Erica</au><au>Saiers, James E</au><au>Dorman, Frank L</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Elucidating Environmental Fingerprinting Mechanisms of Unconventional Gas Development through Hydrocarbon Analysis</atitle><jtitle>Analytical chemistry (Washington)</jtitle><addtitle>Anal. Chem</addtitle><date>2018-04-17</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>90</volume><issue>8</issue><spage>5466</spage><epage>5473</epage><pages>5466-5473</pages><issn>0003-2700</issn><eissn>1520-6882</eissn><abstract>Hydraulic fracturing is an increasingly common technique for the extraction of natural gas entrapped in shale formations. This technique has been highly criticized due to the possibility of environmental contamination, underscoring the need for method development to identify chemical factors that could be utilized in point-source identification of environmental contamination events. Here, we utilize comprehensive two-dimensional gas chromatography (GC × GC) coupled to high-resolution time-of-flight (HRT) mass spectrometry, which offers a unique instrumental combination allowing for petroleomics hydrocarbon fingerprinting. Four flowback fluids from Marcellus shale gas wells in geographic proximity were analyzed for differentiating factors that could be exploited in environmental forensics investigations of shale gas impacts. Kendrick mass defect (KMD) plots of these flowback fluids illustrated well-to-well differences in heteroatomic substituted hydrocarbons, while GC × GC separations showed variance in cyclic hydrocarbons and polyaromatic hydrocarbons among the four wells. Additionally, generating plots that combine GC × GC separation with KMD established a novel data-rich visualization technique that further differentiated the samples.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>American Chemical Society</pub><pmid>29580048</pmid><doi>10.1021/acs.analchem.8b00822</doi><tpages>8</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8039-7911</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0003-2700 |
ispartof | Analytical chemistry (Washington), 2018-04, Vol.90 (8), p.5466-5473 |
issn | 0003-2700 1520-6882 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2019039802 |
source | ACS Publications |
subjects | Analytical chemistry Chemistry Contamination Cyclic hydrocarbons Extraction processes Fingerprinting Gas chromatography Gas wells Gases Hydraulic fracturing Hydrocarbons Mass spectrometry Natural gas Organic chemistry Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons Shale gas |
title | Elucidating Environmental Fingerprinting Mechanisms of Unconventional Gas Development through Hydrocarbon Analysis |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-12T08%3A02%3A45IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Elucidating%20Environmental%20Fingerprinting%20Mechanisms%20of%20Unconventional%20Gas%20Development%20through%20Hydrocarbon%20Analysis&rft.jtitle=Analytical%20chemistry%20(Washington)&rft.au=Piotrowski,%20Paulina%20K&rft.date=2018-04-17&rft.volume=90&rft.issue=8&rft.spage=5466&rft.epage=5473&rft.pages=5466-5473&rft.issn=0003-2700&rft.eissn=1520-6882&rft_id=info:doi/10.1021/acs.analchem.8b00822&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2019039802%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2104172056&rft_id=info:pmid/29580048&rfr_iscdi=true |