24-Hour Proteinuria Versus Spot Protein-Creatinine Ratio for Kidney Transplant Management in Clinical Practice

24-hour proteinuria (24h-P) has been the most widespread test for clinical follow-up of proteinuria after kidney transplantation (KT), but urine collection is often not properly collected. Spot protein-creatinine ratio (P/Cr) has become the alternative to 24h-P for proteinuria evaluation in many KT...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Transplantation proceedings 2018-03, Vol.50 (2), p.560-564
Hauptverfasser: Rodelo-Haad, C., Esquivias-Motta, E., Agüera, M.L., Aljama, P., Rodríguez-Benot, A.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 564
container_issue 2
container_start_page 560
container_title Transplantation proceedings
container_volume 50
creator Rodelo-Haad, C.
Esquivias-Motta, E.
Agüera, M.L.
Aljama, P.
Rodríguez-Benot, A.
description 24-hour proteinuria (24h-P) has been the most widespread test for clinical follow-up of proteinuria after kidney transplantation (KT), but urine collection is often not properly collected. Spot protein-creatinine ratio (P/Cr) has become the alternative to 24h-P for proteinuria evaluation in many KT units. However, its reliability, equivalence to 24h-P, and prognostic value regarding allograft outcome remain unknown. Therefore, the aim of this study was to evaluate the correlation and agreement between both methods for assessing proteinuria and to analyze which of them is a better predictor of graft survival. We collected proteinuria measurements from KT patients in our center. 24h-P was adjusted for body surface area. Pearson correlation test and the Bland-Altman method were used to analyze correlation and agreement. Survival analysis was performed with the use of the Kaplan-Meier method and multivariate Cox proportional hazard model. A total of 8,549 urine samples were analyzed from 472 patients in whom 24h-P and P/Cr were simultaneously measured. A significant correlation was observed between 24h-P and P/Cr (r = .76; P < .001); however, the agreement between methods showed that P/Cr overestimated proteinuria compared with 24h-P, particularly when the latter was >1 g/24 h. The Cox regression multivariate model showed an increased risk of graft loss associated with proteinuria when assessed by either 24h-P (hazard ratio [HR] 6.53, 95% confidence interval [CI] 2.49–17.1) or P/Cr (HR 3.34, 95% CI 1.04–10.7). P/Cr is an method interchangeable with 24h-P for detecting proteinuria after KT. When proteinuria increases, the P/Cr overestimates 24h-P, even though it also has a significant and similar prognostic value for predicting graft survival. •24-hour proteinuria collection is cumbersome, even for highly motivated patients.•Spot protein-creatinine ratio is a reliable method to evaluate protein excretion.•The agreement between 24-hour proteinuria and protein-creatinine ratio decreases as proteinuria rises to >1 g/24 h.•The ability of each method to predict graft loss may be clinically interchangeable.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.transproceed.2017.09.071
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2019039625</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0041134517309429</els_id><sourcerecordid>2019039625</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c380t-33d6344fdeef27f2242d60ef4d542eff3dab831fb2ed4a3472f757cfe2a437a83</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkE1P3DAQhi3UChboX0BWT70k9VfipLdqgVJBBaK0V8trj5FXWXtrO5X49zUsK3HsaT78vjPjB6GPlLSU0P7zui1Jh7xN0QDYlhEqWzK2RNIDtKCD5A3rGX-HFoQI2lAuuiN0nPOa1JoJfoiO2NjJcejYAgUmmqs4J3yXYgEf5uQ1_g0pzxn_3May7zfLBLr44APg-5pE7GLC194GeMIPL-dMOhT8Qwf9CBuoqQ94OVWH0VOdok3xBk7Re6enDB9e4wn6dXnxsLxqbm6_fV9-vWkMH0hpOLc9F8JZAMekY0ww2xNwwnaCgXPc6tXAqVsxsEJzIZmTnTQOmBZc6oGfoE-7uRXSnxlyURufDUz1RohzVpXZSPjYs65Kv-ykJsWcEzi1TX6j05OiRD3zVmv1lvezVyoyqsq7ms9e98yrTX3bW_eAq-B8J4D6278eksrGQzBgfQJTlI3-f_b8A4tqmlI</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2019039625</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>24-Hour Proteinuria Versus Spot Protein-Creatinine Ratio for Kidney Transplant Management in Clinical Practice</title><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Rodelo-Haad, C. ; Esquivias-Motta, E. ; Agüera, M.L. ; Aljama, P. ; Rodríguez-Benot, A.</creator><creatorcontrib>Rodelo-Haad, C. ; Esquivias-Motta, E. ; Agüera, M.L. ; Aljama, P. ; Rodríguez-Benot, A.</creatorcontrib><description>24-hour proteinuria (24h-P) has been the most widespread test for clinical follow-up of proteinuria after kidney transplantation (KT), but urine collection is often not properly collected. Spot protein-creatinine ratio (P/Cr) has become the alternative to 24h-P for proteinuria evaluation in many KT units. However, its reliability, equivalence to 24h-P, and prognostic value regarding allograft outcome remain unknown. Therefore, the aim of this study was to evaluate the correlation and agreement between both methods for assessing proteinuria and to analyze which of them is a better predictor of graft survival. We collected proteinuria measurements from KT patients in our center. 24h-P was adjusted for body surface area. Pearson correlation test and the Bland-Altman method were used to analyze correlation and agreement. Survival analysis was performed with the use of the Kaplan-Meier method and multivariate Cox proportional hazard model. A total of 8,549 urine samples were analyzed from 472 patients in whom 24h-P and P/Cr were simultaneously measured. A significant correlation was observed between 24h-P and P/Cr (r = .76; P &lt; .001); however, the agreement between methods showed that P/Cr overestimated proteinuria compared with 24h-P, particularly when the latter was &gt;1 g/24 h. The Cox regression multivariate model showed an increased risk of graft loss associated with proteinuria when assessed by either 24h-P (hazard ratio [HR] 6.53, 95% confidence interval [CI] 2.49–17.1) or P/Cr (HR 3.34, 95% CI 1.04–10.7). P/Cr is an method interchangeable with 24h-P for detecting proteinuria after KT. When proteinuria increases, the P/Cr overestimates 24h-P, even though it also has a significant and similar prognostic value for predicting graft survival. •24-hour proteinuria collection is cumbersome, even for highly motivated patients.•Spot protein-creatinine ratio is a reliable method to evaluate protein excretion.•The agreement between 24-hour proteinuria and protein-creatinine ratio decreases as proteinuria rises to &gt;1 g/24 h.•The ability of each method to predict graft loss may be clinically interchangeable.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0041-1345</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-2623</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2017.09.071</identifier><identifier>PMID: 29579852</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Inc</publisher><ispartof>Transplantation proceedings, 2018-03, Vol.50 (2), p.560-564</ispartof><rights>2017 Elsevier Inc.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c380t-33d6344fdeef27f2242d60ef4d542eff3dab831fb2ed4a3472f757cfe2a437a83</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c380t-33d6344fdeef27f2242d60ef4d542eff3dab831fb2ed4a3472f757cfe2a437a83</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.transproceed.2017.09.071$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,3537,27905,27906,45976</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29579852$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Rodelo-Haad, C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Esquivias-Motta, E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Agüera, M.L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Aljama, P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rodríguez-Benot, A.</creatorcontrib><title>24-Hour Proteinuria Versus Spot Protein-Creatinine Ratio for Kidney Transplant Management in Clinical Practice</title><title>Transplantation proceedings</title><addtitle>Transplant Proc</addtitle><description>24-hour proteinuria (24h-P) has been the most widespread test for clinical follow-up of proteinuria after kidney transplantation (KT), but urine collection is often not properly collected. Spot protein-creatinine ratio (P/Cr) has become the alternative to 24h-P for proteinuria evaluation in many KT units. However, its reliability, equivalence to 24h-P, and prognostic value regarding allograft outcome remain unknown. Therefore, the aim of this study was to evaluate the correlation and agreement between both methods for assessing proteinuria and to analyze which of them is a better predictor of graft survival. We collected proteinuria measurements from KT patients in our center. 24h-P was adjusted for body surface area. Pearson correlation test and the Bland-Altman method were used to analyze correlation and agreement. Survival analysis was performed with the use of the Kaplan-Meier method and multivariate Cox proportional hazard model. A total of 8,549 urine samples were analyzed from 472 patients in whom 24h-P and P/Cr were simultaneously measured. A significant correlation was observed between 24h-P and P/Cr (r = .76; P &lt; .001); however, the agreement between methods showed that P/Cr overestimated proteinuria compared with 24h-P, particularly when the latter was &gt;1 g/24 h. The Cox regression multivariate model showed an increased risk of graft loss associated with proteinuria when assessed by either 24h-P (hazard ratio [HR] 6.53, 95% confidence interval [CI] 2.49–17.1) or P/Cr (HR 3.34, 95% CI 1.04–10.7). P/Cr is an method interchangeable with 24h-P for detecting proteinuria after KT. When proteinuria increases, the P/Cr overestimates 24h-P, even though it also has a significant and similar prognostic value for predicting graft survival. •24-hour proteinuria collection is cumbersome, even for highly motivated patients.•Spot protein-creatinine ratio is a reliable method to evaluate protein excretion.•The agreement between 24-hour proteinuria and protein-creatinine ratio decreases as proteinuria rises to &gt;1 g/24 h.•The ability of each method to predict graft loss may be clinically interchangeable.</description><issn>0041-1345</issn><issn>1873-2623</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqNkE1P3DAQhi3UChboX0BWT70k9VfipLdqgVJBBaK0V8trj5FXWXtrO5X49zUsK3HsaT78vjPjB6GPlLSU0P7zui1Jh7xN0QDYlhEqWzK2RNIDtKCD5A3rGX-HFoQI2lAuuiN0nPOa1JoJfoiO2NjJcejYAgUmmqs4J3yXYgEf5uQ1_g0pzxn_3May7zfLBLr44APg-5pE7GLC194GeMIPL-dMOhT8Qwf9CBuoqQ94OVWH0VOdok3xBk7Re6enDB9e4wn6dXnxsLxqbm6_fV9-vWkMH0hpOLc9F8JZAMekY0ww2xNwwnaCgXPc6tXAqVsxsEJzIZmTnTQOmBZc6oGfoE-7uRXSnxlyURufDUz1RohzVpXZSPjYs65Kv-ykJsWcEzi1TX6j05OiRD3zVmv1lvezVyoyqsq7ms9e98yrTX3bW_eAq-B8J4D6278eksrGQzBgfQJTlI3-f_b8A4tqmlI</recordid><startdate>201803</startdate><enddate>201803</enddate><creator>Rodelo-Haad, C.</creator><creator>Esquivias-Motta, E.</creator><creator>Agüera, M.L.</creator><creator>Aljama, P.</creator><creator>Rodríguez-Benot, A.</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201803</creationdate><title>24-Hour Proteinuria Versus Spot Protein-Creatinine Ratio for Kidney Transplant Management in Clinical Practice</title><author>Rodelo-Haad, C. ; Esquivias-Motta, E. ; Agüera, M.L. ; Aljama, P. ; Rodríguez-Benot, A.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c380t-33d6344fdeef27f2242d60ef4d542eff3dab831fb2ed4a3472f757cfe2a437a83</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Rodelo-Haad, C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Esquivias-Motta, E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Agüera, M.L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Aljama, P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rodríguez-Benot, A.</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Transplantation proceedings</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Rodelo-Haad, C.</au><au>Esquivias-Motta, E.</au><au>Agüera, M.L.</au><au>Aljama, P.</au><au>Rodríguez-Benot, A.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>24-Hour Proteinuria Versus Spot Protein-Creatinine Ratio for Kidney Transplant Management in Clinical Practice</atitle><jtitle>Transplantation proceedings</jtitle><addtitle>Transplant Proc</addtitle><date>2018-03</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>50</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>560</spage><epage>564</epage><pages>560-564</pages><issn>0041-1345</issn><eissn>1873-2623</eissn><abstract>24-hour proteinuria (24h-P) has been the most widespread test for clinical follow-up of proteinuria after kidney transplantation (KT), but urine collection is often not properly collected. Spot protein-creatinine ratio (P/Cr) has become the alternative to 24h-P for proteinuria evaluation in many KT units. However, its reliability, equivalence to 24h-P, and prognostic value regarding allograft outcome remain unknown. Therefore, the aim of this study was to evaluate the correlation and agreement between both methods for assessing proteinuria and to analyze which of them is a better predictor of graft survival. We collected proteinuria measurements from KT patients in our center. 24h-P was adjusted for body surface area. Pearson correlation test and the Bland-Altman method were used to analyze correlation and agreement. Survival analysis was performed with the use of the Kaplan-Meier method and multivariate Cox proportional hazard model. A total of 8,549 urine samples were analyzed from 472 patients in whom 24h-P and P/Cr were simultaneously measured. A significant correlation was observed between 24h-P and P/Cr (r = .76; P &lt; .001); however, the agreement between methods showed that P/Cr overestimated proteinuria compared with 24h-P, particularly when the latter was &gt;1 g/24 h. The Cox regression multivariate model showed an increased risk of graft loss associated with proteinuria when assessed by either 24h-P (hazard ratio [HR] 6.53, 95% confidence interval [CI] 2.49–17.1) or P/Cr (HR 3.34, 95% CI 1.04–10.7). P/Cr is an method interchangeable with 24h-P for detecting proteinuria after KT. When proteinuria increases, the P/Cr overestimates 24h-P, even though it also has a significant and similar prognostic value for predicting graft survival. •24-hour proteinuria collection is cumbersome, even for highly motivated patients.•Spot protein-creatinine ratio is a reliable method to evaluate protein excretion.•The agreement between 24-hour proteinuria and protein-creatinine ratio decreases as proteinuria rises to &gt;1 g/24 h.•The ability of each method to predict graft loss may be clinically interchangeable.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>29579852</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.transproceed.2017.09.071</doi><tpages>5</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0041-1345
ispartof Transplantation proceedings, 2018-03, Vol.50 (2), p.560-564
issn 0041-1345
1873-2623
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2019039625
source Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals
title 24-Hour Proteinuria Versus Spot Protein-Creatinine Ratio for Kidney Transplant Management in Clinical Practice
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-20T04%3A54%3A38IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=24-Hour%20Proteinuria%20Versus%20Spot%20Protein-Creatinine%20Ratio%20for%20Kidney%20Transplant%20Management%20in%20Clinical%20Practice&rft.jtitle=Transplantation%20proceedings&rft.au=Rodelo-Haad,%20C.&rft.date=2018-03&rft.volume=50&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=560&rft.epage=564&rft.pages=560-564&rft.issn=0041-1345&rft.eissn=1873-2623&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.transproceed.2017.09.071&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2019039625%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2019039625&rft_id=info:pmid/29579852&rft_els_id=S0041134517309429&rfr_iscdi=true