Sediment dynamics modulated by burrowing crab activities in contrasting SW Atlantic intertidal habitats
Biogenic bottom features, animal burrows and biological activities interact with the hydrodynamics of the sediment–water interface to produce altered patterns of sediment erosion, transport and deposition which have consequences for large-scale geomorphologic features. It has been suggested that dep...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Estuarine, coastal and shelf science coastal and shelf science, 2008-11, Vol.80 (3), p.365-373 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 373 |
---|---|
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 365 |
container_title | Estuarine, coastal and shelf science |
container_volume | 80 |
creator | Escapa, Mauricio Perillo, Gerardo M.E. Iribarne, Oscar |
description | Biogenic bottom features, animal burrows and biological activities interact with the hydrodynamics of the sediment–water interface to produce altered patterns of sediment erosion, transport and deposition which have consequences for large-scale geomorphologic features. It has been suggested that depending on the hydrodynamic status of the habitat, the biological activity on the bottom may have a variety of effects. In some cases, different bioturbation activities by the same organism can result in different consequences. The burrowing crab
Neohelice granulata is the most important bioturbator at SW Atlantic saltmarshes and tidal plains. Because of the great variety of habitats that this species may inhabit, it is possible to compare its bioturbation effects between zones dominated by different hydrodynamic conditions. Internal marsh microhabitats, tidal creeks bottoms and basins, and open mudflats were selected as contrasting zones for the comparison on a large saltmarsh at Bahía Blanca Estuary (Argentina). Crab burrows act as passive traps of sediment in all zones, because their entrances remain open during inundation periods at high tide. Mounds are generated when crabs remove sediments from the burrows to the surface and become distinctive features in all the zones. Two different mechanisms of sediment transport utilizing mounds as sediment sources were registered. In the first one, parts of fresh mound sediments were transported when exposed to water flow during flooding and ebbing tide, with higher mound erosion where currents were higher as compared to internal marsh habitats and open mudflats. In the second mechanism, mounds exposed to atmospheric influence during low tide became desiccated and cracked forming ellipsoidal blocks, which were then transported by currents in zones of intense water flow in the saltmarsh edge. Sedimentary dynamics varied between zones; crabs were promoting trapping of sediments in the internal saltmarsh (380
g
m
−2
day
−1) and open mudflats (1.2
kg
m
−2
day
−1), but were enhancing sediment removal in the saltmarsh edge (between 10 and 500
g
m
−2
day
−1 in summer). The implication is that biologically mediated sedimentological changes could be different among microhabitats, potentially leading to contrasting geomorphologic effects within a particular ecosystem. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.ecss.2008.08.020 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_20185381</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0272771408003375</els_id><sourcerecordid>14028911</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a459t-5cf896156a000e9d9ce8e149d175cdaaae5caeca82e28bfe1f17b0f84d5b444e3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkU1LHEEQhptgIKvxD-TUl3ibtbp3eqYHchFJVBA8mOCxqamuMb3Mh3b3KvvvM8OKxwgFBfU-9cFbQnxTsFagqvPtmimltQaw6yU0fBIrBU1VAChzJFaga13UtSq_iOOUtnNVmY1eicd79mHgMUu_H3EIlOQw-V2Pmb1s97LdxTi9hvFRUsRWIuXwEnLgJMMoaRpzxJQX-f5BXuQexxxoljLHHDz28i-2IWNOX8XnDvvEp2_5RPz59fP35XVxe3d1c3lxW2BpmlwY6mxTKVMhAHDjG2LLqmy8qg15RGRDyIRWs7Ztx6pTdQudLb1py7LkzYk4O8x9itPzjlN2Q0jE_XwZT7vkNChrNlZ9CKoStG3UAuoDSHFKKXLnnmIYMO6dAreY77ZuMd8t5rslNMxN39-mYyLsu4gjhfTeqcHWlbH1zP04cDx78hI4ukSBR5qfEpmy81P435p_-mCdNg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>14028911</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Sediment dynamics modulated by burrowing crab activities in contrasting SW Atlantic intertidal habitats</title><source>Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)</source><creator>Escapa, Mauricio ; Perillo, Gerardo M.E. ; Iribarne, Oscar</creator><creatorcontrib>Escapa, Mauricio ; Perillo, Gerardo M.E. ; Iribarne, Oscar</creatorcontrib><description>Biogenic bottom features, animal burrows and biological activities interact with the hydrodynamics of the sediment–water interface to produce altered patterns of sediment erosion, transport and deposition which have consequences for large-scale geomorphologic features. It has been suggested that depending on the hydrodynamic status of the habitat, the biological activity on the bottom may have a variety of effects. In some cases, different bioturbation activities by the same organism can result in different consequences. The burrowing crab
Neohelice granulata is the most important bioturbator at SW Atlantic saltmarshes and tidal plains. Because of the great variety of habitats that this species may inhabit, it is possible to compare its bioturbation effects between zones dominated by different hydrodynamic conditions. Internal marsh microhabitats, tidal creeks bottoms and basins, and open mudflats were selected as contrasting zones for the comparison on a large saltmarsh at Bahía Blanca Estuary (Argentina). Crab burrows act as passive traps of sediment in all zones, because their entrances remain open during inundation periods at high tide. Mounds are generated when crabs remove sediments from the burrows to the surface and become distinctive features in all the zones. Two different mechanisms of sediment transport utilizing mounds as sediment sources were registered. In the first one, parts of fresh mound sediments were transported when exposed to water flow during flooding and ebbing tide, with higher mound erosion where currents were higher as compared to internal marsh habitats and open mudflats. In the second mechanism, mounds exposed to atmospheric influence during low tide became desiccated and cracked forming ellipsoidal blocks, which were then transported by currents in zones of intense water flow in the saltmarsh edge. Sedimentary dynamics varied between zones; crabs were promoting trapping of sediments in the internal saltmarsh (380
g
m
−2
day
−1) and open mudflats (1.2
kg
m
−2
day
−1), but were enhancing sediment removal in the saltmarsh edge (between 10 and 500
g
m
−2
day
−1 in summer). The implication is that biologically mediated sedimentological changes could be different among microhabitats, potentially leading to contrasting geomorphologic effects within a particular ecosystem.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0272-7714</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1096-0015</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.ecss.2008.08.020</identifier><identifier>CODEN: ECSSD3</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Kidlington: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Animal and plant ecology ; Animal, plant and microbial ecology ; Bahía Blanca ; Biological and medical sciences ; bioturbation ; Brackish water ecosystems ; Crustacea ; Decapoda ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; Invertebrates ; mud flats ; Neohelice granulata ; saltmarshes ; sedimentation ; Synecology</subject><ispartof>Estuarine, coastal and shelf science, 2008-11, Vol.80 (3), p.365-373</ispartof><rights>2008 Elsevier Ltd</rights><rights>2009 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a459t-5cf896156a000e9d9ce8e149d175cdaaae5caeca82e28bfe1f17b0f84d5b444e3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-a459t-5cf896156a000e9d9ce8e149d175cdaaae5caeca82e28bfe1f17b0f84d5b444e3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ecss.2008.08.020$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3550,27924,27925,45995</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=20876587$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Escapa, Mauricio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Perillo, Gerardo M.E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Iribarne, Oscar</creatorcontrib><title>Sediment dynamics modulated by burrowing crab activities in contrasting SW Atlantic intertidal habitats</title><title>Estuarine, coastal and shelf science</title><description>Biogenic bottom features, animal burrows and biological activities interact with the hydrodynamics of the sediment–water interface to produce altered patterns of sediment erosion, transport and deposition which have consequences for large-scale geomorphologic features. It has been suggested that depending on the hydrodynamic status of the habitat, the biological activity on the bottom may have a variety of effects. In some cases, different bioturbation activities by the same organism can result in different consequences. The burrowing crab
Neohelice granulata is the most important bioturbator at SW Atlantic saltmarshes and tidal plains. Because of the great variety of habitats that this species may inhabit, it is possible to compare its bioturbation effects between zones dominated by different hydrodynamic conditions. Internal marsh microhabitats, tidal creeks bottoms and basins, and open mudflats were selected as contrasting zones for the comparison on a large saltmarsh at Bahía Blanca Estuary (Argentina). Crab burrows act as passive traps of sediment in all zones, because their entrances remain open during inundation periods at high tide. Mounds are generated when crabs remove sediments from the burrows to the surface and become distinctive features in all the zones. Two different mechanisms of sediment transport utilizing mounds as sediment sources were registered. In the first one, parts of fresh mound sediments were transported when exposed to water flow during flooding and ebbing tide, with higher mound erosion where currents were higher as compared to internal marsh habitats and open mudflats. In the second mechanism, mounds exposed to atmospheric influence during low tide became desiccated and cracked forming ellipsoidal blocks, which were then transported by currents in zones of intense water flow in the saltmarsh edge. Sedimentary dynamics varied between zones; crabs were promoting trapping of sediments in the internal saltmarsh (380
g
m
−2
day
−1) and open mudflats (1.2
kg
m
−2
day
−1), but were enhancing sediment removal in the saltmarsh edge (between 10 and 500
g
m
−2
day
−1 in summer). The implication is that biologically mediated sedimentological changes could be different among microhabitats, potentially leading to contrasting geomorphologic effects within a particular ecosystem.</description><subject>Animal and plant ecology</subject><subject>Animal, plant and microbial ecology</subject><subject>Bahía Blanca</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>bioturbation</subject><subject>Brackish water ecosystems</subject><subject>Crustacea</subject><subject>Decapoda</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>Invertebrates</subject><subject>mud flats</subject><subject>Neohelice granulata</subject><subject>saltmarshes</subject><subject>sedimentation</subject><subject>Synecology</subject><issn>0272-7714</issn><issn>1096-0015</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2008</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkU1LHEEQhptgIKvxD-TUl3ibtbp3eqYHchFJVBA8mOCxqamuMb3Mh3b3KvvvM8OKxwgFBfU-9cFbQnxTsFagqvPtmimltQaw6yU0fBIrBU1VAChzJFaga13UtSq_iOOUtnNVmY1eicd79mHgMUu_H3EIlOQw-V2Pmb1s97LdxTi9hvFRUsRWIuXwEnLgJMMoaRpzxJQX-f5BXuQexxxoljLHHDz28i-2IWNOX8XnDvvEp2_5RPz59fP35XVxe3d1c3lxW2BpmlwY6mxTKVMhAHDjG2LLqmy8qg15RGRDyIRWs7Ztx6pTdQudLb1py7LkzYk4O8x9itPzjlN2Q0jE_XwZT7vkNChrNlZ9CKoStG3UAuoDSHFKKXLnnmIYMO6dAreY77ZuMd8t5rslNMxN39-mYyLsu4gjhfTeqcHWlbH1zP04cDx78hI4ukSBR5qfEpmy81P435p_-mCdNg</recordid><startdate>20081130</startdate><enddate>20081130</enddate><creator>Escapa, Mauricio</creator><creator>Perillo, Gerardo M.E.</creator><creator>Iribarne, Oscar</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Elsevier</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>SOI</scope><scope>7QH</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7TN</scope><scope>7TV</scope><scope>7U6</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>H95</scope><scope>H96</scope><scope>L.G</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20081130</creationdate><title>Sediment dynamics modulated by burrowing crab activities in contrasting SW Atlantic intertidal habitats</title><author>Escapa, Mauricio ; Perillo, Gerardo M.E. ; Iribarne, Oscar</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a459t-5cf896156a000e9d9ce8e149d175cdaaae5caeca82e28bfe1f17b0f84d5b444e3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2008</creationdate><topic>Animal and plant ecology</topic><topic>Animal, plant and microbial ecology</topic><topic>Bahía Blanca</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>bioturbation</topic><topic>Brackish water ecosystems</topic><topic>Crustacea</topic><topic>Decapoda</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>Invertebrates</topic><topic>mud flats</topic><topic>Neohelice granulata</topic><topic>saltmarshes</topic><topic>sedimentation</topic><topic>Synecology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Escapa, Mauricio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Perillo, Gerardo M.E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Iribarne, Oscar</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Aqualine</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Oceanic Abstracts</collection><collection>Pollution Abstracts</collection><collection>Sustainability Science Abstracts</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 1: Biological Sciences & Living Resources</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 2: Ocean Technology, Policy & Non-Living Resources</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><jtitle>Estuarine, coastal and shelf science</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Escapa, Mauricio</au><au>Perillo, Gerardo M.E.</au><au>Iribarne, Oscar</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Sediment dynamics modulated by burrowing crab activities in contrasting SW Atlantic intertidal habitats</atitle><jtitle>Estuarine, coastal and shelf science</jtitle><date>2008-11-30</date><risdate>2008</risdate><volume>80</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>365</spage><epage>373</epage><pages>365-373</pages><issn>0272-7714</issn><eissn>1096-0015</eissn><coden>ECSSD3</coden><abstract>Biogenic bottom features, animal burrows and biological activities interact with the hydrodynamics of the sediment–water interface to produce altered patterns of sediment erosion, transport and deposition which have consequences for large-scale geomorphologic features. It has been suggested that depending on the hydrodynamic status of the habitat, the biological activity on the bottom may have a variety of effects. In some cases, different bioturbation activities by the same organism can result in different consequences. The burrowing crab
Neohelice granulata is the most important bioturbator at SW Atlantic saltmarshes and tidal plains. Because of the great variety of habitats that this species may inhabit, it is possible to compare its bioturbation effects between zones dominated by different hydrodynamic conditions. Internal marsh microhabitats, tidal creeks bottoms and basins, and open mudflats were selected as contrasting zones for the comparison on a large saltmarsh at Bahía Blanca Estuary (Argentina). Crab burrows act as passive traps of sediment in all zones, because their entrances remain open during inundation periods at high tide. Mounds are generated when crabs remove sediments from the burrows to the surface and become distinctive features in all the zones. Two different mechanisms of sediment transport utilizing mounds as sediment sources were registered. In the first one, parts of fresh mound sediments were transported when exposed to water flow during flooding and ebbing tide, with higher mound erosion where currents were higher as compared to internal marsh habitats and open mudflats. In the second mechanism, mounds exposed to atmospheric influence during low tide became desiccated and cracked forming ellipsoidal blocks, which were then transported by currents in zones of intense water flow in the saltmarsh edge. Sedimentary dynamics varied between zones; crabs were promoting trapping of sediments in the internal saltmarsh (380
g
m
−2
day
−1) and open mudflats (1.2
kg
m
−2
day
−1), but were enhancing sediment removal in the saltmarsh edge (between 10 and 500
g
m
−2
day
−1 in summer). The implication is that biologically mediated sedimentological changes could be different among microhabitats, potentially leading to contrasting geomorphologic effects within a particular ecosystem.</abstract><cop>Kidlington</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><doi>10.1016/j.ecss.2008.08.020</doi><tpages>9</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0272-7714 |
ispartof | Estuarine, coastal and shelf science, 2008-11, Vol.80 (3), p.365-373 |
issn | 0272-7714 1096-0015 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_20185381 |
source | Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier) |
subjects | Animal and plant ecology Animal, plant and microbial ecology Bahía Blanca Biological and medical sciences bioturbation Brackish water ecosystems Crustacea Decapoda Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology Invertebrates mud flats Neohelice granulata saltmarshes sedimentation Synecology |
title | Sediment dynamics modulated by burrowing crab activities in contrasting SW Atlantic intertidal habitats |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-23T18%3A23%3A04IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Sediment%20dynamics%20modulated%20by%20burrowing%20crab%20activities%20in%20contrasting%20SW%20Atlantic%20intertidal%20habitats&rft.jtitle=Estuarine,%20coastal%20and%20shelf%20science&rft.au=Escapa,%20Mauricio&rft.date=2008-11-30&rft.volume=80&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=365&rft.epage=373&rft.pages=365-373&rft.issn=0272-7714&rft.eissn=1096-0015&rft.coden=ECSSD3&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.ecss.2008.08.020&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E14028911%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=14028911&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=S0272771408003375&rfr_iscdi=true |