Management of myringitis: Current concepts and review

Objectives This study reviews the proposed mechanisms underlying the development of myringitis and suggests optimal guidelines for the successful treatment and prevention of recurrence through a literature review. Review Methods Studies reporting the treatment outcomes of myringitis were systematica...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The Laryngoscope 2018-09, Vol.128 (9), p.2157-2162
Hauptverfasser: Chung, Juyong, Lee, Doh Young, Kim, Young Ho
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 2162
container_issue 9
container_start_page 2157
container_title The Laryngoscope
container_volume 128
creator Chung, Juyong
Lee, Doh Young
Kim, Young Ho
description Objectives This study reviews the proposed mechanisms underlying the development of myringitis and suggests optimal guidelines for the successful treatment and prevention of recurrence through a literature review. Review Methods Studies reporting the treatment outcomes of myringitis were systematically reviewed by searching the MEDLINE, PubMed, and Embase databases for studies published from 2000 to 2017. The search for myringitis yielded 57 results, and 31 were found to be relevant. Thirteen articles related to bullous myringitis associated with acute otitis media were excluded; the remaining 18 were included in this study. The studies were reviewed with attention to clinical characteristics, treatment options, and results after treatment. Results Among 18 publications, 10 suggested therapeutic options for myringitis: 1) five studies suggested management using topical agents, 2) three studies suggested laser‐assisted treatment, and 3) two studies suggested surgical treatment. Treatments using topical agents or a laser showed highly variable resolution rates (63.6%–100% and 20%–85.7%, respectively). Two studies introducing surgical therapy reported good treatment outcomes (95.8%–100%). Five articles discussed the characteristics or diagnosis of myringitis; however, there was a lack of evidence for the related mechanism. Conclusions No well‐designed randomized studies have assessed optimal treatments. Although surgery showed better treatment results than topical agents and laser‐assisted treatment, the wide range of resolution rates indicates that proper patient selection is needed. Further studies are needed to improve the current understanding and management of myringitis. Laryngoscope, 128:2157–2162, 2018
doi_str_mv 10.1002/lary.27179
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2018024228</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2116599819</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3579-a2638870acfc91d6707a1bd64c6df175e0096615860c18f5358dfb3a1c38d2063</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kMtKAzEUQIMotlY3foAMuBFham7SvNyV4gsqgijoKqSZTJkyj5rMWObvnTrVhQtXF-49HC4HoVPAY8CYXOXGt2MiQKg9NARGIZ4oxfbRsDvSWDLyNkBHIawwBkEZPkQDopiglJMhYo-mNEtXuLKOqjQqWp-Vy6zOwnU0a7zfrm1VWreuQ2TKJPLuM3ObY3SQmjy4k90codfbm5fZfTx_unuYTeexpUyo2BBOpRTY2NQqSLjAwsAi4RPLkxQEcxgrzoFJji3IlFEmk3RBDVgqE4I5HaGL3rv21UfjQq2LLFiX56Z0VRM0wSAxmRAiO_T8D7qqGl9232kCwJlSElRHXfaU9VUI3qV67bOi66cB621MvY2pv2N28NlO2SwKl_yiP_U6AHpgk-Wu_Uel59Pn9176BX1JfRU</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2116599819</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Management of myringitis: Current concepts and review</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><creator>Chung, Juyong ; Lee, Doh Young ; Kim, Young Ho</creator><creatorcontrib>Chung, Juyong ; Lee, Doh Young ; Kim, Young Ho</creatorcontrib><description>Objectives This study reviews the proposed mechanisms underlying the development of myringitis and suggests optimal guidelines for the successful treatment and prevention of recurrence through a literature review. Review Methods Studies reporting the treatment outcomes of myringitis were systematically reviewed by searching the MEDLINE, PubMed, and Embase databases for studies published from 2000 to 2017. The search for myringitis yielded 57 results, and 31 were found to be relevant. Thirteen articles related to bullous myringitis associated with acute otitis media were excluded; the remaining 18 were included in this study. The studies were reviewed with attention to clinical characteristics, treatment options, and results after treatment. Results Among 18 publications, 10 suggested therapeutic options for myringitis: 1) five studies suggested management using topical agents, 2) three studies suggested laser‐assisted treatment, and 3) two studies suggested surgical treatment. Treatments using topical agents or a laser showed highly variable resolution rates (63.6%–100% and 20%–85.7%, respectively). Two studies introducing surgical therapy reported good treatment outcomes (95.8%–100%). Five articles discussed the characteristics or diagnosis of myringitis; however, there was a lack of evidence for the related mechanism. Conclusions No well‐designed randomized studies have assessed optimal treatments. Although surgery showed better treatment results than topical agents and laser‐assisted treatment, the wide range of resolution rates indicates that proper patient selection is needed. Further studies are needed to improve the current understanding and management of myringitis. Laryngoscope, 128:2157–2162, 2018</description><identifier>ISSN: 0023-852X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1531-4995</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/lary.27179</identifier><identifier>PMID: 29573362</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</publisher><subject>Administration, Topical ; Adult ; Anti-Bacterial Agents - administration &amp; dosage ; Child ; Clinical outcomes ; CO2 laser ; Disease Management ; Female ; Humans ; Lasers ; Male ; Middle Ear Ventilation - methods ; Myringitis ; Otitis Media - therapy ; recurrence ; Treatment Outcome</subject><ispartof>The Laryngoscope, 2018-09, Vol.128 (9), p.2157-2162</ispartof><rights>2018 The American Laryngological, Rhinological and Otological Society, Inc.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3579-a2638870acfc91d6707a1bd64c6df175e0096615860c18f5358dfb3a1c38d2063</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3579-a2638870acfc91d6707a1bd64c6df175e0096615860c18f5358dfb3a1c38d2063</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-1590-8559 ; 0000-0002-5642-107X</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2Flary.27179$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2Flary.27179$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,27901,27902,45550,45551</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29573362$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Chung, Juyong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lee, Doh Young</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kim, Young Ho</creatorcontrib><title>Management of myringitis: Current concepts and review</title><title>The Laryngoscope</title><addtitle>Laryngoscope</addtitle><description>Objectives This study reviews the proposed mechanisms underlying the development of myringitis and suggests optimal guidelines for the successful treatment and prevention of recurrence through a literature review. Review Methods Studies reporting the treatment outcomes of myringitis were systematically reviewed by searching the MEDLINE, PubMed, and Embase databases for studies published from 2000 to 2017. The search for myringitis yielded 57 results, and 31 were found to be relevant. Thirteen articles related to bullous myringitis associated with acute otitis media were excluded; the remaining 18 were included in this study. The studies were reviewed with attention to clinical characteristics, treatment options, and results after treatment. Results Among 18 publications, 10 suggested therapeutic options for myringitis: 1) five studies suggested management using topical agents, 2) three studies suggested laser‐assisted treatment, and 3) two studies suggested surgical treatment. Treatments using topical agents or a laser showed highly variable resolution rates (63.6%–100% and 20%–85.7%, respectively). Two studies introducing surgical therapy reported good treatment outcomes (95.8%–100%). Five articles discussed the characteristics or diagnosis of myringitis; however, there was a lack of evidence for the related mechanism. Conclusions No well‐designed randomized studies have assessed optimal treatments. Although surgery showed better treatment results than topical agents and laser‐assisted treatment, the wide range of resolution rates indicates that proper patient selection is needed. Further studies are needed to improve the current understanding and management of myringitis. Laryngoscope, 128:2157–2162, 2018</description><subject>Administration, Topical</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Anti-Bacterial Agents - administration &amp; dosage</subject><subject>Child</subject><subject>Clinical outcomes</subject><subject>CO2 laser</subject><subject>Disease Management</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Lasers</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Ear Ventilation - methods</subject><subject>Myringitis</subject><subject>Otitis Media - therapy</subject><subject>recurrence</subject><subject>Treatment Outcome</subject><issn>0023-852X</issn><issn>1531-4995</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kMtKAzEUQIMotlY3foAMuBFham7SvNyV4gsqgijoKqSZTJkyj5rMWObvnTrVhQtXF-49HC4HoVPAY8CYXOXGt2MiQKg9NARGIZ4oxfbRsDvSWDLyNkBHIawwBkEZPkQDopiglJMhYo-mNEtXuLKOqjQqWp-Vy6zOwnU0a7zfrm1VWreuQ2TKJPLuM3ObY3SQmjy4k90codfbm5fZfTx_unuYTeexpUyo2BBOpRTY2NQqSLjAwsAi4RPLkxQEcxgrzoFJji3IlFEmk3RBDVgqE4I5HaGL3rv21UfjQq2LLFiX56Z0VRM0wSAxmRAiO_T8D7qqGl9232kCwJlSElRHXfaU9VUI3qV67bOi66cB621MvY2pv2N28NlO2SwKl_yiP_U6AHpgk-Wu_Uel59Pn9176BX1JfRU</recordid><startdate>201809</startdate><enddate>201809</enddate><creator>Chung, Juyong</creator><creator>Lee, Doh Young</creator><creator>Kim, Young Ho</creator><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1590-8559</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5642-107X</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>201809</creationdate><title>Management of myringitis: Current concepts and review</title><author>Chung, Juyong ; Lee, Doh Young ; Kim, Young Ho</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3579-a2638870acfc91d6707a1bd64c6df175e0096615860c18f5358dfb3a1c38d2063</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Administration, Topical</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Anti-Bacterial Agents - administration &amp; dosage</topic><topic>Child</topic><topic>Clinical outcomes</topic><topic>CO2 laser</topic><topic>Disease Management</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Lasers</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Ear Ventilation - methods</topic><topic>Myringitis</topic><topic>Otitis Media - therapy</topic><topic>recurrence</topic><topic>Treatment Outcome</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Chung, Juyong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lee, Doh Young</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kim, Young Ho</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>The Laryngoscope</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Chung, Juyong</au><au>Lee, Doh Young</au><au>Kim, Young Ho</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Management of myringitis: Current concepts and review</atitle><jtitle>The Laryngoscope</jtitle><addtitle>Laryngoscope</addtitle><date>2018-09</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>128</volume><issue>9</issue><spage>2157</spage><epage>2162</epage><pages>2157-2162</pages><issn>0023-852X</issn><eissn>1531-4995</eissn><abstract>Objectives This study reviews the proposed mechanisms underlying the development of myringitis and suggests optimal guidelines for the successful treatment and prevention of recurrence through a literature review. Review Methods Studies reporting the treatment outcomes of myringitis were systematically reviewed by searching the MEDLINE, PubMed, and Embase databases for studies published from 2000 to 2017. The search for myringitis yielded 57 results, and 31 were found to be relevant. Thirteen articles related to bullous myringitis associated with acute otitis media were excluded; the remaining 18 were included in this study. The studies were reviewed with attention to clinical characteristics, treatment options, and results after treatment. Results Among 18 publications, 10 suggested therapeutic options for myringitis: 1) five studies suggested management using topical agents, 2) three studies suggested laser‐assisted treatment, and 3) two studies suggested surgical treatment. Treatments using topical agents or a laser showed highly variable resolution rates (63.6%–100% and 20%–85.7%, respectively). Two studies introducing surgical therapy reported good treatment outcomes (95.8%–100%). Five articles discussed the characteristics or diagnosis of myringitis; however, there was a lack of evidence for the related mechanism. Conclusions No well‐designed randomized studies have assessed optimal treatments. Although surgery showed better treatment results than topical agents and laser‐assisted treatment, the wide range of resolution rates indicates that proper patient selection is needed. Further studies are needed to improve the current understanding and management of myringitis. Laryngoscope, 128:2157–2162, 2018</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</pub><pmid>29573362</pmid><doi>10.1002/lary.27179</doi><tpages>6</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1590-8559</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5642-107X</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0023-852X
ispartof The Laryngoscope, 2018-09, Vol.128 (9), p.2157-2162
issn 0023-852X
1531-4995
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2018024228
source MEDLINE; Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete
subjects Administration, Topical
Adult
Anti-Bacterial Agents - administration & dosage
Child
Clinical outcomes
CO2 laser
Disease Management
Female
Humans
Lasers
Male
Middle Ear Ventilation - methods
Myringitis
Otitis Media - therapy
recurrence
Treatment Outcome
title Management of myringitis: Current concepts and review
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-12T20%3A02%3A02IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Management%20of%20myringitis:%20Current%20concepts%20and%20review&rft.jtitle=The%20Laryngoscope&rft.au=Chung,%20Juyong&rft.date=2018-09&rft.volume=128&rft.issue=9&rft.spage=2157&rft.epage=2162&rft.pages=2157-2162&rft.issn=0023-852X&rft.eissn=1531-4995&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/lary.27179&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2116599819%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2116599819&rft_id=info:pmid/29573362&rfr_iscdi=true