Accounting for scattering directivity and fish behaviour in multibeam-echosounder surveys

Cutter, G. R. Jr and Demer, D. A. 2007. Accounting for scattering directivity and fish behaviour in multibeam-echosounder surveys. – ICES Journal of Marine Science, 64. Multibeam echosounders can improve the efficiency and the precision of acoustic-survey estimates by providing greater sampling volu...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:ICES journal of marine science 2007-12, Vol.64 (9), p.1664-1674
Hauptverfasser: Cutter, George R., Demer, David A.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext bestellen
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1674
container_issue 9
container_start_page 1664
container_title ICES journal of marine science
container_volume 64
creator Cutter, George R.
Demer, David A.
description Cutter, G. R. Jr and Demer, D. A. 2007. Accounting for scattering directivity and fish behaviour in multibeam-echosounder surveys. – ICES Journal of Marine Science, 64. Multibeam echosounders can improve the efficiency and the precision of acoustic-survey estimates by providing greater sampling volumes than single-beam echosounders. For a multibeam echosounder, the target strength of fish can vary with its pitch, roll, and yaw. Here, normalized, acoustic backscatter patterns from fish schools are modelled by beam-incidence angle,0–180°, considering the scattering-directivity patterns of each fish. Variation of pitch angle causes a decrease in the mean and an increase in the variance of the backscatter in the vertical beam, but has no effect on the backscatter in the outer beams. Conversely, variation of the yaw causes a decrease in the mean and an increase in the variance of the backscatter in only the outer beams. Because the fish-scattering model predicts different backscatter at dorsal- vs. lateral-incidence angles, backscatter did vary with roll angle. In the hypothetical case of fish avoiding a vessel, the backscatter decreases strongly the outer beams. The results of the model were compared with multibeam measurements of fish schools. In general, the measured mean backscatter vs. beam-incidence angle was nearly uniform. The methods described here provide an approach to accounting for scattering directivity and fish behaviour in multibeam-echosounder surveys.
doi_str_mv 10.1093/icesjms/fsm151
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_TOX</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_20161520</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><oup_id>10.1093/icesjms/fsm151</oup_id><sourcerecordid>20161520</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c382t-8cecb7c90e4ea74dad3cfd49a6b0dca169a14f78a8cf3ede8e5d087d79d5a0123</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkDtPwzAURi0EEqWwMmdCYkhrx0kcj1V5FFSJgSIBi-XY19Qlj2I7Ff33pApiZboPne8MH0KXBE8I5nRqFfhN7afG1yQjR2jUf7OYJwU_PuxZGlNC-Sk6836DMWZpjkfobaZU2zXBNh-RaV3klQwB3OHU1oEKdmfDPpKNjoz166iEtdzZtnORbaK6q4ItQdYxqHXre4-GXtG5Hez9OToxsvJw8TvH6OXudjVfxMun-4f5bBkrWiQhLhSokimOIQXJUi01VUanXOYl1kqSnEuSGlbIQhkKGgrINC6YZlxnEpOEjtHV4N269qsDH0RtvYKqkg20nRcJJjnJEtyDkwFUrvXegRFbZ2vp9oJgcWhQ_DYohgb7wPUQaLvt_2w8sNYH-P6jpfsUOaMsE4vXd_H4vKJzym4Eoz_I04fX</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>20161520</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Accounting for scattering directivity and fish behaviour in multibeam-echosounder surveys</title><source>Oxford Journals Open Access Collection</source><creator>Cutter, George R. ; Demer, David A.</creator><creatorcontrib>Cutter, George R. ; Demer, David A.</creatorcontrib><description>Cutter, G. R. Jr and Demer, D. A. 2007. Accounting for scattering directivity and fish behaviour in multibeam-echosounder surveys. – ICES Journal of Marine Science, 64. Multibeam echosounders can improve the efficiency and the precision of acoustic-survey estimates by providing greater sampling volumes than single-beam echosounders. For a multibeam echosounder, the target strength of fish can vary with its pitch, roll, and yaw. Here, normalized, acoustic backscatter patterns from fish schools are modelled by beam-incidence angle,0–180°, considering the scattering-directivity patterns of each fish. Variation of pitch angle causes a decrease in the mean and an increase in the variance of the backscatter in the vertical beam, but has no effect on the backscatter in the outer beams. Conversely, variation of the yaw causes a decrease in the mean and an increase in the variance of the backscatter in only the outer beams. Because the fish-scattering model predicts different backscatter at dorsal- vs. lateral-incidence angles, backscatter did vary with roll angle. In the hypothetical case of fish avoiding a vessel, the backscatter decreases strongly the outer beams. The results of the model were compared with multibeam measurements of fish schools. In general, the measured mean backscatter vs. beam-incidence angle was nearly uniform. The methods described here provide an approach to accounting for scattering directivity and fish behaviour in multibeam-echosounder surveys.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1054-3139</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1095-9289</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1093/icesjms/fsm151</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford University Press</publisher><subject>acoustic scattering ; directivity ; echo integration ; fish ; fish-scattering model ; incidence angle ; Marine ; multibeam echosounder ; target strength ; volume backscatter</subject><ispartof>ICES journal of marine science, 2007-12, Vol.64 (9), p.1664-1674</ispartof><rights>2007 International Council for the Exploration of the Sea. Published by Oxford Journals. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org 2007</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c382t-8cecb7c90e4ea74dad3cfd49a6b0dca169a14f78a8cf3ede8e5d087d79d5a0123</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c382t-8cecb7c90e4ea74dad3cfd49a6b0dca169a14f78a8cf3ede8e5d087d79d5a0123</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1604,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><linktorsrc>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1093/icesjms/fsm151$$EView_record_in_Oxford_University_Press$$FView_record_in_$$GOxford_University_Press</linktorsrc></links><search><creatorcontrib>Cutter, George R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Demer, David A.</creatorcontrib><title>Accounting for scattering directivity and fish behaviour in multibeam-echosounder surveys</title><title>ICES journal of marine science</title><description>Cutter, G. R. Jr and Demer, D. A. 2007. Accounting for scattering directivity and fish behaviour in multibeam-echosounder surveys. – ICES Journal of Marine Science, 64. Multibeam echosounders can improve the efficiency and the precision of acoustic-survey estimates by providing greater sampling volumes than single-beam echosounders. For a multibeam echosounder, the target strength of fish can vary with its pitch, roll, and yaw. Here, normalized, acoustic backscatter patterns from fish schools are modelled by beam-incidence angle,0–180°, considering the scattering-directivity patterns of each fish. Variation of pitch angle causes a decrease in the mean and an increase in the variance of the backscatter in the vertical beam, but has no effect on the backscatter in the outer beams. Conversely, variation of the yaw causes a decrease in the mean and an increase in the variance of the backscatter in only the outer beams. Because the fish-scattering model predicts different backscatter at dorsal- vs. lateral-incidence angles, backscatter did vary with roll angle. In the hypothetical case of fish avoiding a vessel, the backscatter decreases strongly the outer beams. The results of the model were compared with multibeam measurements of fish schools. In general, the measured mean backscatter vs. beam-incidence angle was nearly uniform. The methods described here provide an approach to accounting for scattering directivity and fish behaviour in multibeam-echosounder surveys.</description><subject>acoustic scattering</subject><subject>directivity</subject><subject>echo integration</subject><subject>fish</subject><subject>fish-scattering model</subject><subject>incidence angle</subject><subject>Marine</subject><subject>multibeam echosounder</subject><subject>target strength</subject><subject>volume backscatter</subject><issn>1054-3139</issn><issn>1095-9289</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2007</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkDtPwzAURi0EEqWwMmdCYkhrx0kcj1V5FFSJgSIBi-XY19Qlj2I7Ff33pApiZboPne8MH0KXBE8I5nRqFfhN7afG1yQjR2jUf7OYJwU_PuxZGlNC-Sk6836DMWZpjkfobaZU2zXBNh-RaV3klQwB3OHU1oEKdmfDPpKNjoz166iEtdzZtnORbaK6q4ItQdYxqHXre4-GXtG5Hez9OToxsvJw8TvH6OXudjVfxMun-4f5bBkrWiQhLhSokimOIQXJUi01VUanXOYl1kqSnEuSGlbIQhkKGgrINC6YZlxnEpOEjtHV4N269qsDH0RtvYKqkg20nRcJJjnJEtyDkwFUrvXegRFbZ2vp9oJgcWhQ_DYohgb7wPUQaLvt_2w8sNYH-P6jpfsUOaMsE4vXd_H4vKJzym4Eoz_I04fX</recordid><startdate>200712</startdate><enddate>200712</enddate><creator>Cutter, George R.</creator><creator>Demer, David A.</creator><general>Oxford University Press</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TN</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>H95</scope><scope>H96</scope><scope>L.G</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200712</creationdate><title>Accounting for scattering directivity and fish behaviour in multibeam-echosounder surveys</title><author>Cutter, George R. ; Demer, David A.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c382t-8cecb7c90e4ea74dad3cfd49a6b0dca169a14f78a8cf3ede8e5d087d79d5a0123</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2007</creationdate><topic>acoustic scattering</topic><topic>directivity</topic><topic>echo integration</topic><topic>fish</topic><topic>fish-scattering model</topic><topic>incidence angle</topic><topic>Marine</topic><topic>multibeam echosounder</topic><topic>target strength</topic><topic>volume backscatter</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Cutter, George R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Demer, David A.</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Oceanic Abstracts</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 1: Biological Sciences &amp; Living Resources</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 2: Ocean Technology, Policy &amp; Non-Living Resources</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><jtitle>ICES journal of marine science</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext_linktorsrc</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Cutter, George R.</au><au>Demer, David A.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Accounting for scattering directivity and fish behaviour in multibeam-echosounder surveys</atitle><jtitle>ICES journal of marine science</jtitle><date>2007-12</date><risdate>2007</risdate><volume>64</volume><issue>9</issue><spage>1664</spage><epage>1674</epage><pages>1664-1674</pages><issn>1054-3139</issn><eissn>1095-9289</eissn><abstract>Cutter, G. R. Jr and Demer, D. A. 2007. Accounting for scattering directivity and fish behaviour in multibeam-echosounder surveys. – ICES Journal of Marine Science, 64. Multibeam echosounders can improve the efficiency and the precision of acoustic-survey estimates by providing greater sampling volumes than single-beam echosounders. For a multibeam echosounder, the target strength of fish can vary with its pitch, roll, and yaw. Here, normalized, acoustic backscatter patterns from fish schools are modelled by beam-incidence angle,0–180°, considering the scattering-directivity patterns of each fish. Variation of pitch angle causes a decrease in the mean and an increase in the variance of the backscatter in the vertical beam, but has no effect on the backscatter in the outer beams. Conversely, variation of the yaw causes a decrease in the mean and an increase in the variance of the backscatter in only the outer beams. Because the fish-scattering model predicts different backscatter at dorsal- vs. lateral-incidence angles, backscatter did vary with roll angle. In the hypothetical case of fish avoiding a vessel, the backscatter decreases strongly the outer beams. The results of the model were compared with multibeam measurements of fish schools. In general, the measured mean backscatter vs. beam-incidence angle was nearly uniform. The methods described here provide an approach to accounting for scattering directivity and fish behaviour in multibeam-echosounder surveys.</abstract><pub>Oxford University Press</pub><doi>10.1093/icesjms/fsm151</doi><tpages>11</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext_linktorsrc
identifier ISSN: 1054-3139
ispartof ICES journal of marine science, 2007-12, Vol.64 (9), p.1664-1674
issn 1054-3139
1095-9289
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_20161520
source Oxford Journals Open Access Collection
subjects acoustic scattering
directivity
echo integration
fish
fish-scattering model
incidence angle
Marine
multibeam echosounder
target strength
volume backscatter
title Accounting for scattering directivity and fish behaviour in multibeam-echosounder surveys
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-06T14%3A42%3A43IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_TOX&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Accounting%20for%20scattering%20directivity%20and%20fish%20behaviour%20in%20multibeam-echosounder%20surveys&rft.jtitle=ICES%20journal%20of%20marine%20science&rft.au=Cutter,%20George%20R.&rft.date=2007-12&rft.volume=64&rft.issue=9&rft.spage=1664&rft.epage=1674&rft.pages=1664-1674&rft.issn=1054-3139&rft.eissn=1095-9289&rft_id=info:doi/10.1093/icesjms/fsm151&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_TOX%3E20161520%3C/proquest_TOX%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=20161520&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_oup_id=10.1093/icesjms/fsm151&rfr_iscdi=true