Accounting for scattering directivity and fish behaviour in multibeam-echosounder surveys
Cutter, G. R. Jr and Demer, D. A. 2007. Accounting for scattering directivity and fish behaviour in multibeam-echosounder surveys. – ICES Journal of Marine Science, 64. Multibeam echosounders can improve the efficiency and the precision of acoustic-survey estimates by providing greater sampling volu...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | ICES journal of marine science 2007-12, Vol.64 (9), p.1664-1674 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext bestellen |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 1674 |
---|---|
container_issue | 9 |
container_start_page | 1664 |
container_title | ICES journal of marine science |
container_volume | 64 |
creator | Cutter, George R. Demer, David A. |
description | Cutter, G. R. Jr and Demer, D. A. 2007. Accounting for scattering directivity and fish behaviour in multibeam-echosounder surveys. – ICES Journal of Marine Science, 64. Multibeam echosounders can improve the efficiency and the precision of acoustic-survey estimates by providing greater sampling volumes than single-beam echosounders. For a multibeam echosounder, the target strength of fish can vary with its pitch, roll, and yaw. Here, normalized, acoustic backscatter patterns from fish schools are modelled by beam-incidence angle,0–180°, considering the scattering-directivity patterns of each fish. Variation of pitch angle causes a decrease in the mean and an increase in the variance of the backscatter in the vertical beam, but has no effect on the backscatter in the outer beams. Conversely, variation of the yaw causes a decrease in the mean and an increase in the variance of the backscatter in only the outer beams. Because the fish-scattering model predicts different backscatter at dorsal- vs. lateral-incidence angles, backscatter did vary with roll angle. In the hypothetical case of fish avoiding a vessel, the backscatter decreases strongly the outer beams. The results of the model were compared with multibeam measurements of fish schools. In general, the measured mean backscatter vs. beam-incidence angle was nearly uniform. The methods described here provide an approach to accounting for scattering directivity and fish behaviour in multibeam-echosounder surveys. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1093/icesjms/fsm151 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_TOX</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_20161520</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><oup_id>10.1093/icesjms/fsm151</oup_id><sourcerecordid>20161520</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c382t-8cecb7c90e4ea74dad3cfd49a6b0dca169a14f78a8cf3ede8e5d087d79d5a0123</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkDtPwzAURi0EEqWwMmdCYkhrx0kcj1V5FFSJgSIBi-XY19Qlj2I7Ff33pApiZboPne8MH0KXBE8I5nRqFfhN7afG1yQjR2jUf7OYJwU_PuxZGlNC-Sk6836DMWZpjkfobaZU2zXBNh-RaV3klQwB3OHU1oEKdmfDPpKNjoz166iEtdzZtnORbaK6q4ItQdYxqHXre4-GXtG5Hez9OToxsvJw8TvH6OXudjVfxMun-4f5bBkrWiQhLhSokimOIQXJUi01VUanXOYl1kqSnEuSGlbIQhkKGgrINC6YZlxnEpOEjtHV4N269qsDH0RtvYKqkg20nRcJJjnJEtyDkwFUrvXegRFbZ2vp9oJgcWhQ_DYohgb7wPUQaLvt_2w8sNYH-P6jpfsUOaMsE4vXd_H4vKJzym4Eoz_I04fX</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>20161520</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Accounting for scattering directivity and fish behaviour in multibeam-echosounder surveys</title><source>Oxford Journals Open Access Collection</source><creator>Cutter, George R. ; Demer, David A.</creator><creatorcontrib>Cutter, George R. ; Demer, David A.</creatorcontrib><description>Cutter, G. R. Jr and Demer, D. A. 2007. Accounting for scattering directivity and fish behaviour in multibeam-echosounder surveys. – ICES Journal of Marine Science, 64. Multibeam echosounders can improve the efficiency and the precision of acoustic-survey estimates by providing greater sampling volumes than single-beam echosounders. For a multibeam echosounder, the target strength of fish can vary with its pitch, roll, and yaw. Here, normalized, acoustic backscatter patterns from fish schools are modelled by beam-incidence angle,0–180°, considering the scattering-directivity patterns of each fish. Variation of pitch angle causes a decrease in the mean and an increase in the variance of the backscatter in the vertical beam, but has no effect on the backscatter in the outer beams. Conversely, variation of the yaw causes a decrease in the mean and an increase in the variance of the backscatter in only the outer beams. Because the fish-scattering model predicts different backscatter at dorsal- vs. lateral-incidence angles, backscatter did vary with roll angle. In the hypothetical case of fish avoiding a vessel, the backscatter decreases strongly the outer beams. The results of the model were compared with multibeam measurements of fish schools. In general, the measured mean backscatter vs. beam-incidence angle was nearly uniform. The methods described here provide an approach to accounting for scattering directivity and fish behaviour in multibeam-echosounder surveys.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1054-3139</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1095-9289</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1093/icesjms/fsm151</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford University Press</publisher><subject>acoustic scattering ; directivity ; echo integration ; fish ; fish-scattering model ; incidence angle ; Marine ; multibeam echosounder ; target strength ; volume backscatter</subject><ispartof>ICES journal of marine science, 2007-12, Vol.64 (9), p.1664-1674</ispartof><rights>2007 International Council for the Exploration of the Sea. Published by Oxford Journals. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org 2007</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c382t-8cecb7c90e4ea74dad3cfd49a6b0dca169a14f78a8cf3ede8e5d087d79d5a0123</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c382t-8cecb7c90e4ea74dad3cfd49a6b0dca169a14f78a8cf3ede8e5d087d79d5a0123</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1604,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><linktorsrc>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1093/icesjms/fsm151$$EView_record_in_Oxford_University_Press$$FView_record_in_$$GOxford_University_Press</linktorsrc></links><search><creatorcontrib>Cutter, George R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Demer, David A.</creatorcontrib><title>Accounting for scattering directivity and fish behaviour in multibeam-echosounder surveys</title><title>ICES journal of marine science</title><description>Cutter, G. R. Jr and Demer, D. A. 2007. Accounting for scattering directivity and fish behaviour in multibeam-echosounder surveys. – ICES Journal of Marine Science, 64. Multibeam echosounders can improve the efficiency and the precision of acoustic-survey estimates by providing greater sampling volumes than single-beam echosounders. For a multibeam echosounder, the target strength of fish can vary with its pitch, roll, and yaw. Here, normalized, acoustic backscatter patterns from fish schools are modelled by beam-incidence angle,0–180°, considering the scattering-directivity patterns of each fish. Variation of pitch angle causes a decrease in the mean and an increase in the variance of the backscatter in the vertical beam, but has no effect on the backscatter in the outer beams. Conversely, variation of the yaw causes a decrease in the mean and an increase in the variance of the backscatter in only the outer beams. Because the fish-scattering model predicts different backscatter at dorsal- vs. lateral-incidence angles, backscatter did vary with roll angle. In the hypothetical case of fish avoiding a vessel, the backscatter decreases strongly the outer beams. The results of the model were compared with multibeam measurements of fish schools. In general, the measured mean backscatter vs. beam-incidence angle was nearly uniform. The methods described here provide an approach to accounting for scattering directivity and fish behaviour in multibeam-echosounder surveys.</description><subject>acoustic scattering</subject><subject>directivity</subject><subject>echo integration</subject><subject>fish</subject><subject>fish-scattering model</subject><subject>incidence angle</subject><subject>Marine</subject><subject>multibeam echosounder</subject><subject>target strength</subject><subject>volume backscatter</subject><issn>1054-3139</issn><issn>1095-9289</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2007</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkDtPwzAURi0EEqWwMmdCYkhrx0kcj1V5FFSJgSIBi-XY19Qlj2I7Ff33pApiZboPne8MH0KXBE8I5nRqFfhN7afG1yQjR2jUf7OYJwU_PuxZGlNC-Sk6836DMWZpjkfobaZU2zXBNh-RaV3klQwB3OHU1oEKdmfDPpKNjoz166iEtdzZtnORbaK6q4ItQdYxqHXre4-GXtG5Hez9OToxsvJw8TvH6OXudjVfxMun-4f5bBkrWiQhLhSokimOIQXJUi01VUanXOYl1kqSnEuSGlbIQhkKGgrINC6YZlxnEpOEjtHV4N269qsDH0RtvYKqkg20nRcJJjnJEtyDkwFUrvXegRFbZ2vp9oJgcWhQ_DYohgb7wPUQaLvt_2w8sNYH-P6jpfsUOaMsE4vXd_H4vKJzym4Eoz_I04fX</recordid><startdate>200712</startdate><enddate>200712</enddate><creator>Cutter, George R.</creator><creator>Demer, David A.</creator><general>Oxford University Press</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TN</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>H95</scope><scope>H96</scope><scope>L.G</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200712</creationdate><title>Accounting for scattering directivity and fish behaviour in multibeam-echosounder surveys</title><author>Cutter, George R. ; Demer, David A.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c382t-8cecb7c90e4ea74dad3cfd49a6b0dca169a14f78a8cf3ede8e5d087d79d5a0123</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2007</creationdate><topic>acoustic scattering</topic><topic>directivity</topic><topic>echo integration</topic><topic>fish</topic><topic>fish-scattering model</topic><topic>incidence angle</topic><topic>Marine</topic><topic>multibeam echosounder</topic><topic>target strength</topic><topic>volume backscatter</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Cutter, George R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Demer, David A.</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Oceanic Abstracts</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 1: Biological Sciences & Living Resources</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 2: Ocean Technology, Policy & Non-Living Resources</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><jtitle>ICES journal of marine science</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext_linktorsrc</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Cutter, George R.</au><au>Demer, David A.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Accounting for scattering directivity and fish behaviour in multibeam-echosounder surveys</atitle><jtitle>ICES journal of marine science</jtitle><date>2007-12</date><risdate>2007</risdate><volume>64</volume><issue>9</issue><spage>1664</spage><epage>1674</epage><pages>1664-1674</pages><issn>1054-3139</issn><eissn>1095-9289</eissn><abstract>Cutter, G. R. Jr and Demer, D. A. 2007. Accounting for scattering directivity and fish behaviour in multibeam-echosounder surveys. – ICES Journal of Marine Science, 64. Multibeam echosounders can improve the efficiency and the precision of acoustic-survey estimates by providing greater sampling volumes than single-beam echosounders. For a multibeam echosounder, the target strength of fish can vary with its pitch, roll, and yaw. Here, normalized, acoustic backscatter patterns from fish schools are modelled by beam-incidence angle,0–180°, considering the scattering-directivity patterns of each fish. Variation of pitch angle causes a decrease in the mean and an increase in the variance of the backscatter in the vertical beam, but has no effect on the backscatter in the outer beams. Conversely, variation of the yaw causes a decrease in the mean and an increase in the variance of the backscatter in only the outer beams. Because the fish-scattering model predicts different backscatter at dorsal- vs. lateral-incidence angles, backscatter did vary with roll angle. In the hypothetical case of fish avoiding a vessel, the backscatter decreases strongly the outer beams. The results of the model were compared with multibeam measurements of fish schools. In general, the measured mean backscatter vs. beam-incidence angle was nearly uniform. The methods described here provide an approach to accounting for scattering directivity and fish behaviour in multibeam-echosounder surveys.</abstract><pub>Oxford University Press</pub><doi>10.1093/icesjms/fsm151</doi><tpages>11</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext_linktorsrc |
identifier | ISSN: 1054-3139 |
ispartof | ICES journal of marine science, 2007-12, Vol.64 (9), p.1664-1674 |
issn | 1054-3139 1095-9289 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_20161520 |
source | Oxford Journals Open Access Collection |
subjects | acoustic scattering directivity echo integration fish fish-scattering model incidence angle Marine multibeam echosounder target strength volume backscatter |
title | Accounting for scattering directivity and fish behaviour in multibeam-echosounder surveys |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-06T14%3A42%3A43IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_TOX&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Accounting%20for%20scattering%20directivity%20and%20fish%20behaviour%20in%20multibeam-echosounder%20surveys&rft.jtitle=ICES%20journal%20of%20marine%20science&rft.au=Cutter,%20George%20R.&rft.date=2007-12&rft.volume=64&rft.issue=9&rft.spage=1664&rft.epage=1674&rft.pages=1664-1674&rft.issn=1054-3139&rft.eissn=1095-9289&rft_id=info:doi/10.1093/icesjms/fsm151&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_TOX%3E20161520%3C/proquest_TOX%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=20161520&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_oup_id=10.1093/icesjms/fsm151&rfr_iscdi=true |