Simultaneous Recruitment of Drug Users and Men Who Have Sex with Men in the United States and Russia Using Respondent-Driven Sampling: Sampling Methods and Implications

The Sexual Acquisition and Transmission of HIV Cooperative Agreement Program (SATHCAP) examined the role of drug use in the sexual transmission of the human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) from traditional high-risk groups, such as men who have sex with men (MSM) and drug users (DU), to lower risk grou...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of urban health 2009-07, Vol.86 (Suppl 1), p.5-31
Hauptverfasser: Iguchi, Martin Y., Ober, Allison J., Berry, Sandra H., Fain, Terry, Heckathorn, Douglas D., Gorbach, Pamina M., Heimer, Robert, Kozlov, Andrei, Ouellet, Lawrence J., Shoptaw, Steven, Zule, William A.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 31
container_issue Suppl 1
container_start_page 5
container_title Journal of urban health
container_volume 86
creator Iguchi, Martin Y.
Ober, Allison J.
Berry, Sandra H.
Fain, Terry
Heckathorn, Douglas D.
Gorbach, Pamina M.
Heimer, Robert
Kozlov, Andrei
Ouellet, Lawrence J.
Shoptaw, Steven
Zule, William A.
description The Sexual Acquisition and Transmission of HIV Cooperative Agreement Program (SATHCAP) examined the role of drug use in the sexual transmission of the human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) from traditional high-risk groups, such as men who have sex with men (MSM) and drug users (DU), to lower risk groups in three US cities and in St. Petersburg, Russia. SATHCAP employed respondent-driven sampling (RDS) and a dual high-risk group sampling approach that relied on peer recruitment for a combined, overlapping sample of MSM and DU. The goal of the sampling approach was to recruit an RDS sample of MSM, DU, and individuals who were both MSM and DU (MSM/DU), as well as a sample of sex partners of MSM, DU, and MSM/DU and sex partners of sex partners. The approach efficiently yielded a sample of 8,355 participants, including sex partners, across all four sites. At the US sites—Los Angeles, Chicago, and Raleigh–Durham—the sample consisted of older (mean age = 41 years), primarily black MSM and DU (both injecting and non-injecting); in St. Petersburg, the sample consisted of primarily younger (mean age = 28 years) MSM and DU (injecting). The US sites recruited a large proportion of men who have sex with men and with women, an important group with high potential for establishing a generalized HIV epidemic involving women. The advantage of using the dual high-risk group approach and RDS was, for the most part, the large, efficiently recruited samples of MSM, DU, and MSM/DU. The disadvantages were a recruitment bias by race/ethnicity and income status (at the US sites) and under-enrollment of MSM samples because of short recruitment chains (at the Russian site).
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s11524-009-9365-4
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_20161150</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1891770231</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c443t-750631ee50a98be988c38d4eff2a5ab482ae12960b28cde06d7dbcc1cbaf4d883</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kcGOFCEQhonRuOvqA3gxxIM3FGi6B7yZXXU3WWOy48QjoaF6hk03jECv-kY-pow9cRMTT1Wp-v8PUj9Czxl9zShdvcmMtVwQShVRTdcS8QCdMtFJwmWnHtaeKkUa0dET9CTnW0pZJ1b8MTphqlbaylP0a-2neSwmQJwzvgGbZl8mCAXHAV-keYs3GVLGJjj8CQL-uov40twBXsMP_N2X3Z-pD7jsAG-CL-DwupgCi-VmztmbyvBhW-l5H4OrcHKR_F31rc20H-vq7d-u4souusV9dZhZU3wM-Sl6NJgxw7NjPUObD--_nF-S688fr87fXRMrRFPIqqVdwwBaapTsQUlpG-kEDAM3remF5AYYVx3tubQOaOdWrreW2d4MwknZnKFXC3ef4rcZctGTzxbGcTmR5vWI9ey0Cl_-I7yNcwr1b5pz2UjGeVNFbBHZFHNOMOh98pNJPzWj-pChXjLUNUN9yFCL6nlxBM_9BO7ecQytCvgiyHUVtpDuX_4_9TfHWqlx</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>228381223</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Simultaneous Recruitment of Drug Users and Men Who Have Sex with Men in the United States and Russia Using Respondent-Driven Sampling: Sampling Methods and Implications</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Springer Nature - Complete Springer Journals</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Iguchi, Martin Y. ; Ober, Allison J. ; Berry, Sandra H. ; Fain, Terry ; Heckathorn, Douglas D. ; Gorbach, Pamina M. ; Heimer, Robert ; Kozlov, Andrei ; Ouellet, Lawrence J. ; Shoptaw, Steven ; Zule, William A.</creator><creatorcontrib>Iguchi, Martin Y. ; Ober, Allison J. ; Berry, Sandra H. ; Fain, Terry ; Heckathorn, Douglas D. ; Gorbach, Pamina M. ; Heimer, Robert ; Kozlov, Andrei ; Ouellet, Lawrence J. ; Shoptaw, Steven ; Zule, William A.</creatorcontrib><description>The Sexual Acquisition and Transmission of HIV Cooperative Agreement Program (SATHCAP) examined the role of drug use in the sexual transmission of the human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) from traditional high-risk groups, such as men who have sex with men (MSM) and drug users (DU), to lower risk groups in three US cities and in St. Petersburg, Russia. SATHCAP employed respondent-driven sampling (RDS) and a dual high-risk group sampling approach that relied on peer recruitment for a combined, overlapping sample of MSM and DU. The goal of the sampling approach was to recruit an RDS sample of MSM, DU, and individuals who were both MSM and DU (MSM/DU), as well as a sample of sex partners of MSM, DU, and MSM/DU and sex partners of sex partners. The approach efficiently yielded a sample of 8,355 participants, including sex partners, across all four sites. At the US sites—Los Angeles, Chicago, and Raleigh–Durham—the sample consisted of older (mean age = 41 years), primarily black MSM and DU (both injecting and non-injecting); in St. Petersburg, the sample consisted of primarily younger (mean age = 28 years) MSM and DU (injecting). The US sites recruited a large proportion of men who have sex with men and with women, an important group with high potential for establishing a generalized HIV epidemic involving women. The advantage of using the dual high-risk group approach and RDS was, for the most part, the large, efficiently recruited samples of MSM, DU, and MSM/DU. The disadvantages were a recruitment bias by race/ethnicity and income status (at the US sites) and under-enrollment of MSM samples because of short recruitment chains (at the Russian site).</description><identifier>ISSN: 1099-3460</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1468-2869</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s11524-009-9365-4</identifier><identifier>PMID: 19472058</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Boston: Springer US</publisher><subject>Adult ; Cross-Sectional Studies ; Disease transmission ; Drug abuse ; Epidemiology ; Female ; Gays &amp; lesbians ; Health Informatics ; HIV ; HIV Infections - transmission ; Homosexuality, Male ; Human immunodeficiency virus ; Humans ; Male ; Medicine ; Medicine &amp; Public Health ; Middle Aged ; Patient Selection ; Public Health ; Risk-Taking ; Russia ; Sampling methods ; Sampling Studies ; Sampling techniques ; Selection Bias ; Sexual behavior ; Sexually transmitted diseases ; STD ; Studies ; Substance-Related Disorders ; United States</subject><ispartof>Journal of urban health, 2009-07, Vol.86 (Suppl 1), p.5-31</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2009</rights><rights>The New York Academy of Medicine 2009</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c443t-750631ee50a98be988c38d4eff2a5ab482ae12960b28cde06d7dbcc1cbaf4d883</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c443t-750631ee50a98be988c38d4eff2a5ab482ae12960b28cde06d7dbcc1cbaf4d883</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s11524-009-9365-4$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11524-009-9365-4$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902,41464,42533,51294</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19472058$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Iguchi, Martin Y.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ober, Allison J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Berry, Sandra H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fain, Terry</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Heckathorn, Douglas D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gorbach, Pamina M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Heimer, Robert</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kozlov, Andrei</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ouellet, Lawrence J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shoptaw, Steven</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zule, William A.</creatorcontrib><title>Simultaneous Recruitment of Drug Users and Men Who Have Sex with Men in the United States and Russia Using Respondent-Driven Sampling: Sampling Methods and Implications</title><title>Journal of urban health</title><addtitle>J Urban Health</addtitle><addtitle>J Urban Health</addtitle><description>The Sexual Acquisition and Transmission of HIV Cooperative Agreement Program (SATHCAP) examined the role of drug use in the sexual transmission of the human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) from traditional high-risk groups, such as men who have sex with men (MSM) and drug users (DU), to lower risk groups in three US cities and in St. Petersburg, Russia. SATHCAP employed respondent-driven sampling (RDS) and a dual high-risk group sampling approach that relied on peer recruitment for a combined, overlapping sample of MSM and DU. The goal of the sampling approach was to recruit an RDS sample of MSM, DU, and individuals who were both MSM and DU (MSM/DU), as well as a sample of sex partners of MSM, DU, and MSM/DU and sex partners of sex partners. The approach efficiently yielded a sample of 8,355 participants, including sex partners, across all four sites. At the US sites—Los Angeles, Chicago, and Raleigh–Durham—the sample consisted of older (mean age = 41 years), primarily black MSM and DU (both injecting and non-injecting); in St. Petersburg, the sample consisted of primarily younger (mean age = 28 years) MSM and DU (injecting). The US sites recruited a large proportion of men who have sex with men and with women, an important group with high potential for establishing a generalized HIV epidemic involving women. The advantage of using the dual high-risk group approach and RDS was, for the most part, the large, efficiently recruited samples of MSM, DU, and MSM/DU. The disadvantages were a recruitment bias by race/ethnicity and income status (at the US sites) and under-enrollment of MSM samples because of short recruitment chains (at the Russian site).</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Cross-Sectional Studies</subject><subject>Disease transmission</subject><subject>Drug abuse</subject><subject>Epidemiology</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Gays &amp; lesbians</subject><subject>Health Informatics</subject><subject>HIV</subject><subject>HIV Infections - transmission</subject><subject>Homosexuality, Male</subject><subject>Human immunodeficiency virus</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Medicine &amp; Public Health</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Patient Selection</subject><subject>Public Health</subject><subject>Risk-Taking</subject><subject>Russia</subject><subject>Sampling methods</subject><subject>Sampling Studies</subject><subject>Sampling techniques</subject><subject>Selection Bias</subject><subject>Sexual behavior</subject><subject>Sexually transmitted diseases</subject><subject>STD</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Substance-Related Disorders</subject><subject>United States</subject><issn>1099-3460</issn><issn>1468-2869</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2009</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>C6C</sourceid><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kcGOFCEQhonRuOvqA3gxxIM3FGi6B7yZXXU3WWOy48QjoaF6hk03jECv-kY-pow9cRMTT1Wp-v8PUj9Czxl9zShdvcmMtVwQShVRTdcS8QCdMtFJwmWnHtaeKkUa0dET9CTnW0pZJ1b8MTphqlbaylP0a-2neSwmQJwzvgGbZl8mCAXHAV-keYs3GVLGJjj8CQL-uov40twBXsMP_N2X3Z-pD7jsAG-CL-DwupgCi-VmztmbyvBhW-l5H4OrcHKR_F31rc20H-vq7d-u4souusV9dZhZU3wM-Sl6NJgxw7NjPUObD--_nF-S688fr87fXRMrRFPIqqVdwwBaapTsQUlpG-kEDAM3remF5AYYVx3tubQOaOdWrreW2d4MwknZnKFXC3ef4rcZctGTzxbGcTmR5vWI9ey0Cl_-I7yNcwr1b5pz2UjGeVNFbBHZFHNOMOh98pNJPzWj-pChXjLUNUN9yFCL6nlxBM_9BO7ecQytCvgiyHUVtpDuX_4_9TfHWqlx</recordid><startdate>20090701</startdate><enddate>20090701</enddate><creator>Iguchi, Martin Y.</creator><creator>Ober, Allison J.</creator><creator>Berry, Sandra H.</creator><creator>Fain, Terry</creator><creator>Heckathorn, Douglas D.</creator><creator>Gorbach, Pamina M.</creator><creator>Heimer, Robert</creator><creator>Kozlov, Andrei</creator><creator>Ouellet, Lawrence J.</creator><creator>Shoptaw, Steven</creator><creator>Zule, William A.</creator><general>Springer US</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>C6C</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7T2</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88J</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2R</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7U1</scope><scope>7U2</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>H94</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20090701</creationdate><title>Simultaneous Recruitment of Drug Users and Men Who Have Sex with Men in the United States and Russia Using Respondent-Driven Sampling: Sampling Methods and Implications</title><author>Iguchi, Martin Y. ; Ober, Allison J. ; Berry, Sandra H. ; Fain, Terry ; Heckathorn, Douglas D. ; Gorbach, Pamina M. ; Heimer, Robert ; Kozlov, Andrei ; Ouellet, Lawrence J. ; Shoptaw, Steven ; Zule, William A.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c443t-750631ee50a98be988c38d4eff2a5ab482ae12960b28cde06d7dbcc1cbaf4d883</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2009</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Cross-Sectional Studies</topic><topic>Disease transmission</topic><topic>Drug abuse</topic><topic>Epidemiology</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Gays &amp; lesbians</topic><topic>Health Informatics</topic><topic>HIV</topic><topic>HIV Infections - transmission</topic><topic>Homosexuality, Male</topic><topic>Human immunodeficiency virus</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Medicine &amp; Public Health</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Patient Selection</topic><topic>Public Health</topic><topic>Risk-Taking</topic><topic>Russia</topic><topic>Sampling methods</topic><topic>Sampling Studies</topic><topic>Sampling techniques</topic><topic>Selection Bias</topic><topic>Sexual behavior</topic><topic>Sexually transmitted diseases</topic><topic>STD</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Substance-Related Disorders</topic><topic>United States</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Iguchi, Martin Y.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ober, Allison J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Berry, Sandra H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fain, Terry</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Heckathorn, Douglas D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gorbach, Pamina M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Heimer, Robert</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kozlov, Andrei</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ouellet, Lawrence J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shoptaw, Steven</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zule, William A.</creatorcontrib><collection>Springer Nature OA Free Journals</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health and Safety Science Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Social Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Social Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>Risk Abstracts</collection><collection>Safety Science and Risk</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Journal of urban health</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Iguchi, Martin Y.</au><au>Ober, Allison J.</au><au>Berry, Sandra H.</au><au>Fain, Terry</au><au>Heckathorn, Douglas D.</au><au>Gorbach, Pamina M.</au><au>Heimer, Robert</au><au>Kozlov, Andrei</au><au>Ouellet, Lawrence J.</au><au>Shoptaw, Steven</au><au>Zule, William A.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Simultaneous Recruitment of Drug Users and Men Who Have Sex with Men in the United States and Russia Using Respondent-Driven Sampling: Sampling Methods and Implications</atitle><jtitle>Journal of urban health</jtitle><stitle>J Urban Health</stitle><addtitle>J Urban Health</addtitle><date>2009-07-01</date><risdate>2009</risdate><volume>86</volume><issue>Suppl 1</issue><spage>5</spage><epage>31</epage><pages>5-31</pages><issn>1099-3460</issn><eissn>1468-2869</eissn><abstract>The Sexual Acquisition and Transmission of HIV Cooperative Agreement Program (SATHCAP) examined the role of drug use in the sexual transmission of the human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) from traditional high-risk groups, such as men who have sex with men (MSM) and drug users (DU), to lower risk groups in three US cities and in St. Petersburg, Russia. SATHCAP employed respondent-driven sampling (RDS) and a dual high-risk group sampling approach that relied on peer recruitment for a combined, overlapping sample of MSM and DU. The goal of the sampling approach was to recruit an RDS sample of MSM, DU, and individuals who were both MSM and DU (MSM/DU), as well as a sample of sex partners of MSM, DU, and MSM/DU and sex partners of sex partners. The approach efficiently yielded a sample of 8,355 participants, including sex partners, across all four sites. At the US sites—Los Angeles, Chicago, and Raleigh–Durham—the sample consisted of older (mean age = 41 years), primarily black MSM and DU (both injecting and non-injecting); in St. Petersburg, the sample consisted of primarily younger (mean age = 28 years) MSM and DU (injecting). The US sites recruited a large proportion of men who have sex with men and with women, an important group with high potential for establishing a generalized HIV epidemic involving women. The advantage of using the dual high-risk group approach and RDS was, for the most part, the large, efficiently recruited samples of MSM, DU, and MSM/DU. The disadvantages were a recruitment bias by race/ethnicity and income status (at the US sites) and under-enrollment of MSM samples because of short recruitment chains (at the Russian site).</abstract><cop>Boston</cop><pub>Springer US</pub><pmid>19472058</pmid><doi>10.1007/s11524-009-9365-4</doi><tpages>27</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1099-3460
ispartof Journal of urban health, 2009-07, Vol.86 (Suppl 1), p.5-31
issn 1099-3460
1468-2869
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_20161150
source MEDLINE; Springer Nature - Complete Springer Journals; Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects Adult
Cross-Sectional Studies
Disease transmission
Drug abuse
Epidemiology
Female
Gays & lesbians
Health Informatics
HIV
HIV Infections - transmission
Homosexuality, Male
Human immunodeficiency virus
Humans
Male
Medicine
Medicine & Public Health
Middle Aged
Patient Selection
Public Health
Risk-Taking
Russia
Sampling methods
Sampling Studies
Sampling techniques
Selection Bias
Sexual behavior
Sexually transmitted diseases
STD
Studies
Substance-Related Disorders
United States
title Simultaneous Recruitment of Drug Users and Men Who Have Sex with Men in the United States and Russia Using Respondent-Driven Sampling: Sampling Methods and Implications
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-02T12%3A49%3A59IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Simultaneous%20Recruitment%20of%20Drug%20Users%20and%20Men%20Who%20Have%20Sex%20with%20Men%20in%20the%20United%20States%20and%20Russia%20Using%20Respondent-Driven%20Sampling:%20Sampling%20Methods%20and%20Implications&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20urban%20health&rft.au=Iguchi,%20Martin%20Y.&rft.date=2009-07-01&rft.volume=86&rft.issue=Suppl%201&rft.spage=5&rft.epage=31&rft.pages=5-31&rft.issn=1099-3460&rft.eissn=1468-2869&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s11524-009-9365-4&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1891770231%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=228381223&rft_id=info:pmid/19472058&rfr_iscdi=true