The Influence of Vegetation in Riparian Filterstrips on Coliform Bacteria: I. Movement and Survival in Water
Swine (Sus scrofa) wastewater was applied to three separate 4 m wide × 30 m long riparian filterstrips consisting of 20 m grass and 10 m forest, 10 m grass and 20 m forest, and 10 m grass and 20 m maidencane (Panicum hemitomon Schult.) in Southern Georgia during each season. Total and fecal coliform...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of environmental quality 2000-07, Vol.29 (4), p.1206-1214 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 1214 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 4 |
| container_start_page | 1206 |
| container_title | Journal of environmental quality |
| container_volume | 29 |
| creator | Entry, James A. Hubbard, Robert K. Thies, Janice E. Fuhrmann, Jeffry J. |
| description | Swine (Sus scrofa) wastewater was applied to three separate 4 m wide × 30 m long riparian filterstrips consisting of 20 m grass and 10 m forest, 10 m grass and 20 m forest, and 10 m grass and 20 m maidencane (Panicum hemitomon Schult.) in Southern Georgia during each season. Total and fecal coliform numbers in the applied wastewater pulse did not decline as water moved downslope regardless of vegetation type or season. The pulse of applied wastewater did not move beyond 15 m in any treatment in autumn or summer (dry seasons) and only moved beyond 7.5 m in the 20 m grass‐10 m forest treatment in the summer. Total and fecal coliform numbers in soil water and shallow ground water declined by approximately 10‐fold every 7 d for the first 14 d regardless of vegetative treatment or season. Soil temperature and soil moisture correlated with total coliform bacteria in both 1.5 m wells (r2 = 0.89) and 2.0 m wells (r2 = 0.89), and with fecal coliform bacteria in 1.5 (r2 = 0.82) and 2.0 m (r2 = 0.76) wells. Animal production operations may need to locate in warm‐dry climates so animal waste can be applied to lands to help ensure enteric bacteria input to surface and ground water will not occur. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.2134/jeq2000.00472425002900040026x |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_20159310</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>20159310</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c523X-8c99c578909edd31ed9bd9e6acd5765a4204a41dc87589c45aa5ba33f246ecf23</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqV0V9rFDEQAPBFFDyr3yEo-rbX_N1cBB_s0epJRdSqBR-WaXZWc-SSa7J72m_fLHf4oIIYSIYwv8wQpqqeMjrnTMjjNV5zSumcUqm55IpSbspdltj8vFPNmBK65uW4W80mU0_ofvUg5zWljFPdzCp_8R3JKvR-xGCRxJ58xm84wOBiIC6QD24LyUEgZ84PmPKQ3DaTkltG7_qYNuQEbEk4eE5Wc_I27nCDYSAQOvJxTDu3Az_V-QIFPazu9eAzPjrEo-rT2enF8nV9_u7VavnyvLaKi8t6YY2xSi8MNdh1gmFnrjqDDdhO6UaB5FSCZJ1daLUwVioAdQVC9Fw2aHsujqpn-7rbFK9HzEO7cdmi9xAwjrnllCkjGP0nZFLJppGqwMe_wXUcUyifaJnRwmjJZUEv9simmHPCvt0mt4F00zLaThNrDxNr_zqx8v7JoQlkC75PEKzLv4poI4zURX3dqx_O483_tWjfnL7n06bT-hNcilt75K7w</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>197397424</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The Influence of Vegetation in Riparian Filterstrips on Coliform Bacteria: I. Movement and Survival in Water</title><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><creator>Entry, James A. ; Hubbard, Robert K. ; Thies, Janice E. ; Fuhrmann, Jeffry J.</creator><creatorcontrib>Entry, James A. ; Hubbard, Robert K. ; Thies, Janice E. ; Fuhrmann, Jeffry J.</creatorcontrib><description>Swine (Sus scrofa) wastewater was applied to three separate 4 m wide × 30 m long riparian filterstrips consisting of 20 m grass and 10 m forest, 10 m grass and 20 m forest, and 10 m grass and 20 m maidencane (Panicum hemitomon Schult.) in Southern Georgia during each season. Total and fecal coliform numbers in the applied wastewater pulse did not decline as water moved downslope regardless of vegetation type or season. The pulse of applied wastewater did not move beyond 15 m in any treatment in autumn or summer (dry seasons) and only moved beyond 7.5 m in the 20 m grass‐10 m forest treatment in the summer. Total and fecal coliform numbers in soil water and shallow ground water declined by approximately 10‐fold every 7 d for the first 14 d regardless of vegetative treatment or season. Soil temperature and soil moisture correlated with total coliform bacteria in both 1.5 m wells (r2 = 0.89) and 2.0 m wells (r2 = 0.89), and with fecal coliform bacteria in 1.5 (r2 = 0.82) and 2.0 m (r2 = 0.76) wells. Animal production operations may need to locate in warm‐dry climates so animal waste can be applied to lands to help ensure enteric bacteria input to surface and ground water will not occur.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0047-2425</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1537-2537</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.2134/jeq2000.00472425002900040026x</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JEVQAA</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Madison, WI: American Society of Agronomy, Crop Science Society of America, and Soil Science Society of America</publisher><subject>Agronomy. Soil science and plant productions ; Applied sciences ; Biological and medical sciences ; Continental surface waters ; Earth sciences ; Earth, ocean, space ; Engineering and environment geology. Geothermics ; Exact sciences and technology ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; Groundwaters ; Natural water pollution ; Panicum hemitomon ; Pollution ; Pollution, environment geology ; Riparian vegetation ; Soil and water pollution ; Soil science ; Sus scrofa ; USA, Georgia ; Water treatment and pollution</subject><ispartof>Journal of environmental quality, 2000-07, Vol.29 (4), p.1206-1214</ispartof><rights>2000 American Society of Agronomy, Crop Science Society of America, and Soil Science Society of America</rights><rights>2001 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright American Society of Agronomy, Inc. Jul/Aug 2000</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c523X-8c99c578909edd31ed9bd9e6acd5765a4204a41dc87589c45aa5ba33f246ecf23</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.2134%2Fjeq2000.00472425002900040026x$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.2134%2Fjeq2000.00472425002900040026x$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,27901,27902,45550,45551</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=793947$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Entry, James A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hubbard, Robert K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Thies, Janice E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fuhrmann, Jeffry J.</creatorcontrib><title>The Influence of Vegetation in Riparian Filterstrips on Coliform Bacteria: I. Movement and Survival in Water</title><title>Journal of environmental quality</title><description>Swine (Sus scrofa) wastewater was applied to three separate 4 m wide × 30 m long riparian filterstrips consisting of 20 m grass and 10 m forest, 10 m grass and 20 m forest, and 10 m grass and 20 m maidencane (Panicum hemitomon Schult.) in Southern Georgia during each season. Total and fecal coliform numbers in the applied wastewater pulse did not decline as water moved downslope regardless of vegetation type or season. The pulse of applied wastewater did not move beyond 15 m in any treatment in autumn or summer (dry seasons) and only moved beyond 7.5 m in the 20 m grass‐10 m forest treatment in the summer. Total and fecal coliform numbers in soil water and shallow ground water declined by approximately 10‐fold every 7 d for the first 14 d regardless of vegetative treatment or season. Soil temperature and soil moisture correlated with total coliform bacteria in both 1.5 m wells (r2 = 0.89) and 2.0 m wells (r2 = 0.89), and with fecal coliform bacteria in 1.5 (r2 = 0.82) and 2.0 m (r2 = 0.76) wells. Animal production operations may need to locate in warm‐dry climates so animal waste can be applied to lands to help ensure enteric bacteria input to surface and ground water will not occur.</description><subject>Agronomy. Soil science and plant productions</subject><subject>Applied sciences</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Continental surface waters</subject><subject>Earth sciences</subject><subject>Earth, ocean, space</subject><subject>Engineering and environment geology. Geothermics</subject><subject>Exact sciences and technology</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>Groundwaters</subject><subject>Natural water pollution</subject><subject>Panicum hemitomon</subject><subject>Pollution</subject><subject>Pollution, environment geology</subject><subject>Riparian vegetation</subject><subject>Soil and water pollution</subject><subject>Soil science</subject><subject>Sus scrofa</subject><subject>USA, Georgia</subject><subject>Water treatment and pollution</subject><issn>0047-2425</issn><issn>1537-2537</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2000</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>BEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNqV0V9rFDEQAPBFFDyr3yEo-rbX_N1cBB_s0epJRdSqBR-WaXZWc-SSa7J72m_fLHf4oIIYSIYwv8wQpqqeMjrnTMjjNV5zSumcUqm55IpSbspdltj8vFPNmBK65uW4W80mU0_ofvUg5zWljFPdzCp_8R3JKvR-xGCRxJ58xm84wOBiIC6QD24LyUEgZ84PmPKQ3DaTkltG7_qYNuQEbEk4eE5Wc_I27nCDYSAQOvJxTDu3Az_V-QIFPazu9eAzPjrEo-rT2enF8nV9_u7VavnyvLaKi8t6YY2xSi8MNdh1gmFnrjqDDdhO6UaB5FSCZJ1daLUwVioAdQVC9Fw2aHsujqpn-7rbFK9HzEO7cdmi9xAwjrnllCkjGP0nZFLJppGqwMe_wXUcUyifaJnRwmjJZUEv9simmHPCvt0mt4F00zLaThNrDxNr_zqx8v7JoQlkC75PEKzLv4poI4zURX3dqx_O483_tWjfnL7n06bT-hNcilt75K7w</recordid><startdate>200007</startdate><enddate>200007</enddate><creator>Entry, James A.</creator><creator>Hubbard, Robert K.</creator><creator>Thies, Janice E.</creator><creator>Fuhrmann, Jeffry J.</creator><general>American Society of Agronomy, Crop Science Society of America, and Soil Science Society of America</general><general>Crop Science Society of America</general><general>American Society of Agronomy</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8AF</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>S0X</scope><scope>SOI</scope><scope>7QH</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7TV</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>H97</scope><scope>L.G</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200007</creationdate><title>The Influence of Vegetation in Riparian Filterstrips on Coliform Bacteria: I. Movement and Survival in Water</title><author>Entry, James A. ; Hubbard, Robert K. ; Thies, Janice E. ; Fuhrmann, Jeffry J.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c523X-8c99c578909edd31ed9bd9e6acd5765a4204a41dc87589c45aa5ba33f246ecf23</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2000</creationdate><topic>Agronomy. Soil science and plant productions</topic><topic>Applied sciences</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Continental surface waters</topic><topic>Earth sciences</topic><topic>Earth, ocean, space</topic><topic>Engineering and environment geology. Geothermics</topic><topic>Exact sciences and technology</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>Groundwaters</topic><topic>Natural water pollution</topic><topic>Panicum hemitomon</topic><topic>Pollution</topic><topic>Pollution, environment geology</topic><topic>Riparian vegetation</topic><topic>Soil and water pollution</topic><topic>Soil science</topic><topic>Sus scrofa</topic><topic>USA, Georgia</topic><topic>Water treatment and pollution</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Entry, James A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hubbard, Robert K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Thies, Janice E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fuhrmann, Jeffry J.</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>STEM Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Public Health Database</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Materials Science & Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>eLibrary</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Database</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>SIRS Editorial</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Aqualine</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Pollution Abstracts</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 3: Aquatic Pollution & Environmental Quality</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><jtitle>Journal of environmental quality</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Entry, James A.</au><au>Hubbard, Robert K.</au><au>Thies, Janice E.</au><au>Fuhrmann, Jeffry J.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The Influence of Vegetation in Riparian Filterstrips on Coliform Bacteria: I. Movement and Survival in Water</atitle><jtitle>Journal of environmental quality</jtitle><date>2000-07</date><risdate>2000</risdate><volume>29</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>1206</spage><epage>1214</epage><pages>1206-1214</pages><issn>0047-2425</issn><eissn>1537-2537</eissn><coden>JEVQAA</coden><abstract>Swine (Sus scrofa) wastewater was applied to three separate 4 m wide × 30 m long riparian filterstrips consisting of 20 m grass and 10 m forest, 10 m grass and 20 m forest, and 10 m grass and 20 m maidencane (Panicum hemitomon Schult.) in Southern Georgia during each season. Total and fecal coliform numbers in the applied wastewater pulse did not decline as water moved downslope regardless of vegetation type or season. The pulse of applied wastewater did not move beyond 15 m in any treatment in autumn or summer (dry seasons) and only moved beyond 7.5 m in the 20 m grass‐10 m forest treatment in the summer. Total and fecal coliform numbers in soil water and shallow ground water declined by approximately 10‐fold every 7 d for the first 14 d regardless of vegetative treatment or season. Soil temperature and soil moisture correlated with total coliform bacteria in both 1.5 m wells (r2 = 0.89) and 2.0 m wells (r2 = 0.89), and with fecal coliform bacteria in 1.5 (r2 = 0.82) and 2.0 m (r2 = 0.76) wells. Animal production operations may need to locate in warm‐dry climates so animal waste can be applied to lands to help ensure enteric bacteria input to surface and ground water will not occur.</abstract><cop>Madison, WI</cop><pub>American Society of Agronomy, Crop Science Society of America, and Soil Science Society of America</pub><doi>10.2134/jeq2000.00472425002900040026x</doi><tpages>9</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0047-2425 |
| ispartof | Journal of environmental quality, 2000-07, Vol.29 (4), p.1206-1214 |
| issn | 0047-2425 1537-2537 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_20159310 |
| source | Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete |
| subjects | Agronomy. Soil science and plant productions Applied sciences Biological and medical sciences Continental surface waters Earth sciences Earth, ocean, space Engineering and environment geology. Geothermics Exact sciences and technology Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology Groundwaters Natural water pollution Panicum hemitomon Pollution Pollution, environment geology Riparian vegetation Soil and water pollution Soil science Sus scrofa USA, Georgia Water treatment and pollution |
| title | The Influence of Vegetation in Riparian Filterstrips on Coliform Bacteria: I. Movement and Survival in Water |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-03T18%3A40%3A27IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20Influence%20of%20Vegetation%20in%20Riparian%20Filterstrips%20on%20Coliform%20Bacteria:%20I.%20Movement%20and%20Survival%20in%20Water&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20environmental%20quality&rft.au=Entry,%20James%20A.&rft.date=2000-07&rft.volume=29&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=1206&rft.epage=1214&rft.pages=1206-1214&rft.issn=0047-2425&rft.eissn=1537-2537&rft.coden=JEVQAA&rft_id=info:doi/10.2134/jeq2000.00472425002900040026x&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E20159310%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=197397424&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |